Lakes Of Sylvania, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 163 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 58.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were completed within required timeframes. This affected one (#73) of one resident reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 01/26/26.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed the assessment was initiated on 02/02/26 and was incomplete. Interview on 02/11/2026 at 3:06 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #211 verified she had not completed the admission comprehensive assessment (MDS) within the required 14 days. RN #211 further confirmed today was day 16 and the assessment was not completed. Interview on 02/11/2026 at 4:19 P.M. with RN Clinical Support RN (RNCS) #327 revealed the facility did not have a policy for the completion of MDS assessments.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided to dependent residents. This affected one (#11) resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 01/10/18 with diagnoses of epilepsy, morbid obesity, lymphedema, and anxiety. Review of the significant change comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/15/26, revealed Resident #11 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. Further review revealed Resident #11 required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for bathing.Review of the care plan, initiated 01/26/18, revealed Resident #11 required staff assistance to complete ADL tasks completely and safely. Further review revealed no indication of the level of care required by Resident #11 to perform personal hygiene.Observation on 02/09/26 at 8:16 P.M. revealed Resident #11 sitting up in bed and alert. Further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were implemented. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 59. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 01/10/18 with diagnoses of epilepsy, morbid obesity, lymphedema, and anxiety.Review of the significant change comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/15/26, revealed Resident #11 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, and transitioning from lying to sitting. Further review revealed Resident #11 had a stage three pressure ulcer and did not reject care. Review of Resident #11's care plan, initiated 01/26/18, revealed the resident was at risk for skin breakdown related to impaired mobility, incontinence of bowel and bladder, history of pressure ulcers and obesity. Interventions included encourage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered per physician orders. This affected one (#29) of one resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility identified eight residents (#1, #9, #11, #19, #29, #42, #47, and #84) who received oxygen therapy. The facility census was 59. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 12/10/20 with the diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Review of current physician orders revealed Resident #29 was ordered oxygen to be administered at two liters/minute (l/m).Review of the care plan, revised 02/26/25, revealed Resident #29 had shortness of breath with interventions to administer oxygen per physician orders.Observation on 02/09/26 at 9:54 P.M. revealed Resident #29 had oxygen running via nasal cannula at 2.5 l/m.Observation on 02/10/26 at 8:31 A.M. revealed Resident #29 had oxygen running via nasal cannula at three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for a pressure relieving device. This affected one (#28) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 59.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 11/01/23 with diagnoses of spinal stenosis, intervertebral disc degeneration, paraplegia, and altered mental status. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/16/26, revealed Resident #28 had intact cognition, had upper and lower extremity bilateral impairment, and used a wheelchair for mobility. Further review revealed Resident #28 was at risk for developing pressure injuries and had a pressure reducing device for her bed. Review of a physician order, initiated 10/15/25, revealed Resident #28 should have an air mattress in place. Further review of the order revealed staff should check for proper inflation. The order was discontinued on 02/10/26. Review of the Medication Administration History (MAH) for December 2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received dental services in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #33) of one reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 50. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 01/15/23. Diagnoses included kidney disease, emphysema, bipolar disorder and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 15 and required limited assistance of one staff member and for mobility and transfers. Review of the baseline care plan dated 01/15/23 revealed Resident #33 was noted to have broken teeth with intervention to ensure lighting in resident room was appropriate. Review of the progress notes dated 02/22/23 revealed Resident #33 was seen by the 360 care dentist and was found to need all top teeth (quantity of eight) extracted. The dental group recommended…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2021-08-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to change contaminated gloves before touching food items when serving resident meals. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Resident #7 was identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Observations on 08/09/21 from 11:40 A.M. to 11:55 A.M. of lunch service revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #478 plating resident meals. DA #478 gloved her hands, picked up a plate, touched the serving utensils for the chopped steak, mashed potatoes and California blend vegetables. Then without changing the gloves, picked up a dinner roll with a gloved hand and placed the roll on a plate. DA #478 repeated this process ten times without changing her gloves. In addition, observation of DA #464 revealed she donned gloves and proceeded to touch serving tongs, french fries, a metal pan, opened a refrigerated drawer, and then picked up a hot dog and placed it on the grill. DA #464 then removed her gloves and donned a new pair. DA #464 picked up a loaf…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2021-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of the COVID-19 screening log, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper screening procedures were in place for to assess visitors entering the facility for signs and symptoms of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents residing in the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to properly clean, sanitize and, store bed pans in resident bathrooms. This affected two (#33 and #41) residents, who reside in the same resident room. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/12/21 at 8:15 A.M. revealed the front entrance door was unlocked, allowing outside persons entrance to the building. Once inside, a posted sign indicated visitors are to be screened for signs and symptoms of COVID-19. No staff were available to provide visitor screening for signs and symptoms of COVID-19, allowing visitors to enter building unscreened. Review of the COVID-19 screening log revealed four visitor entries without initials, indicating screening was completed by staff. Interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at resident bedside and failed to maintain a safe environment as care planned for fall prevention. This affected three residents (#11, #13 and #29) who were identified by the facility as being cognitively impaired, independently mobile, and one (#2) of two residents reviewed for fall precautions. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/09/21 at 10:13 A.M. of Resident #9's room revealed a medication cup on the resident's tray table with four pills in the cup. Interview Resident #9 at the time of the observation revealed the pills were prescription medications that were left on her tray table by the nurse. Resident #9 stated the nurse was called away before she was able to take them all. Resident #9 picked up the medications and took them. Interview on 08/09/21 at 10:16 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #449…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-08-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity by hanging signs in resident rooms indicating care needs. This affected two (#13 and #39) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/23/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, spinal stenosis, and dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/07/21, revealed Resident #39 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive two person assistance with bed mobility. Review of the plan of care revealed a resident profile intervention, implemented 08/09/21, to place a sign in the resident room as a reminder to put resident's right hip in straight/neutral alignment when seated in chair and in laying position. Observation on 08/09/21 at 9:58 A.M. of Resident #39's room revealed a sign hanging on the outside of the cabinet door, next to the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH