No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Camp Hill Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ctr

1700 Market Street, Camp Hill, PA 17011 · For profit - Corporation · 123 certified beds · (717) 737-8551 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1900 Chestnut St · (717) 775-5010 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1200 Market St · (717) 761-1995 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1202 Market St · (717) 836-4699 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Little Buffalo State Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2000 Chestnut St · (717) 737-8635

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.1%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.4%10.8%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.6%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.1%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.7%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.3%25.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.9%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine37.3%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.8%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%9.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.231.621.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.411.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 148 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 157 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.4%CMS range 40.4–57.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.5–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.1–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
41.9%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 117.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm as evidenced by fracture of the right hip for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).Review of facility policy, titled OPS 300 Abuse Prohibition with a last revision date of October 24, 2022, revealed Neglect is defined as the failure, indifference, or disregard of the Center, its employees, or service providers to provide care, comfort, safety, goods and services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included history of cerebral infarction (also known as stroke or cerebral vascular accident - sudden loss of blood flow or bleeding into the brain that causes brain cell death), right- above the knee amputation and diabetes mellitus type II (decreased ability of the body to utilize insulin for the transport of glucose from the blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, select facility document review, facility training records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received adequate assistance to prevent falls, which resulted in harm as evidenced by a fracture of the right hip for one of three residents reviewed for falls (Resident 1).Review of facility policy titled, NSG200 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), last revised May 1, 2023, revealed Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were defined as, Hygiene - bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care;.Elimination - toileting. Review of the policy purpose revealed it stated, To ensure ADLs are provided in accordance with accepted standards of practice, the care plan, and the patient's choices and preferences.Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included history of cerebral infarction (also known as stroke or cerebral vascular accident - sudden loss of blood flow or bleeding into the brain that causes brain cell death) above the knee amputation of the right leg and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment in one of three nursing units observed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Safe and Homelike Environment last reviewed January 5, 2026, read, in part, The resident/patient has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment that de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting. The center must provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Observations in Resident 22's room on February 24, 2026, at 10:30 AM and at 2:12 PM, revealed the wall was damaged in a corner of the room, the baseboard was coming away from the wall, four of the ceiling tiles in her room had brown stains on them, and there were holes in the wall above her bed. Observation in Resident 22's room on February 25, 2026, at 9:51 AM, revealed the wall was damaged in a corner of the room, the baseboard was coming away from the wall, four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, review of facility diet extension sheets, review of nutrition facts label, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive and consume foods in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by a physician for six of 36 residents reviewed on a consistent carbohydrate diet (Residents 5, 8, 15, 52, 68, and 106). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Consistency Alterations and Therapeutic Menus last reviewed January 5, 2026, read, in part, The menu is written for a regular/liberalized diet and is extended for a number of therapeutic diets. Purpose: to provide diets as ordered by the physician/advance practice provider (APP). The menu is extended for the following therapeutic diets [including] Consistent Carbohydrate. Review of facility diet extension sheet for the lunch meal on February 25, 2026, revealed the regular/liberalized diet should be served a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and utilize kitchen equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen.Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Storage: Cold Foods last reviewed February 5, 2026, read, in part, All Time/Temperature Control for Safety foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code. Freezer temperatures will be maintained at a temperature of 0 degrees F (Fahrenheit- unit of measure) or below. All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Observation in the dry storage area on February 24, 2026, at 9:28 AM, revealed one open container of ziti pasta not dated with an open date; one open package of fettucine pasta not dated with an open date; one open container of croutons not dated with an open date; three bags of dinner rolls not dated; one package of hot dog buns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an explanation of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications use and obtain consent prior to administering psychotropic medications for one of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medication use (Resident 4). Findings included: Review of facility provided policy, titled NSG206 Behaviors; Management of Symptoms, revised September 25, 2025, revealed, When medication is ordered for behavioral symptoms: Obtain consent. Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a serious, common mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest, and fatigue, lasting at least two weeks and impairing daily life) and dementia (a general term for severe mental function loss). Review of Resident 4's physician orders revealed an order for Zoloft (medication used to treat depression) 25 mg, given by mouth at bedtime for depression, starting on January 29, 2026. Further review revealed an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, document review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents are informed of the items and services that are included in nursing facility services for which the resident may not be charged and those other items and services that the facility offers and for which the resident may be charged, and the amount of charges for those services for three of three residents no longer eligible for Medicare A benefits coverage reviewed (Residents 120, 121, and 122).Findings Include: Review of Resident 120's clinical record revealed an admission date to the facility on November 25, 2025. Review of Resident 120's census information revealed the most recent date of Medicare A coverage that began on December 22, 2025, and ended on December 23, 2025. Review of Resident 120's Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Notification Review form revealed the Resident had not been provided with the required Skilled Nursing Facility-Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage form (SNF-ABN) to be informed of the cost of the items and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure its residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of the 24 residents reviewed (Resident 5).Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Person-Centered Care Plan, recently reviewed January 5, 2026, defined professional standards of Quality as care and all services are provided according to accepted standards of clinical practice. Standards may apply to care provided by a particular clinical discipline or in a specific clinical situation or setting. Review of Resident 5's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included cirrhosis of the liver (a condition in which the liver is scarred and permanently damaged), chronic kidney disease (a long-term, progressive condition where the kidneys are damaged and gradually lose their ability to filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), and dementia (a loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills). Review of Resident 5's census information revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (a nerve disease caused by damage to many nerves) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Observation conducted of Resident 8 on February 24, 2026, at 10:13 AM, revealed the Resident was lying in bed, not wearing a float heel, and did not have any pillows placed under their foot. Interview conducted with Resident 8 on February 25, 2026, at 11:58 AM, revealed that he hardly ever wears a right heel boot as staff do not place it on him. Resident 8 revealed his heel boot was in his closet. Observation conducted of Resident 8 on February 25, 2026, at 11:59 AM, revealed the Resident lying in bed, not wearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 97) for respiratory care. Findings include: Review of facility provided policy, titled Oxygen: Concentrator, revised August 7, 2023, revealed when implementing supplemental oxygen for a resident, step 1. Verify order. Review of Resident 97's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a progressive, incurable, but treatable lung disease) and obstructive sleep apnea (serious, common sleep disorder where throat muscles relax excessively, causing repeated airway collapse and breathing pauses [apnea] during sleep). Observation of Resident 97 on February 24, 2026, at 10:24 AM, revealed Resident 97 lying in bed. Resident 97 was wearing a nasal canula (oxygen delivery device) and receiving supplemental oxygen at 2 liters per minute. Review of Resident 97's care plan revealed a care plan of:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain management is provided in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 86).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Pain Management , last revised on March 24, 2025, revealed, staff will continually observe and monitor patients for comfort and presence of pain and will implement strategies in accordance with professional standards of practice, the patient-centered plan of care, and the patient's choices related to pain management. Review of Resident 86's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland doesn't make enough thyroid hormone) and dementia (a decline in the mental abilities you need for daily living). Review of Resident 86's care plan revealed a focus area that the Resident was at risk for alterations in comfort related to impaired mobility, diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 7).Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care, effective May 1, 2024, revealed, Process: 6. The Center will identify triggers which may re-traumatize patients with a history of trauma. Trigger specific interventions will identify ways to decrease the patient's exposure to triggers which re-traumatize the patient, as well as identify ways to mitigate or decrease the effect of the trigger on the patient and will be added to the patient's care plan. Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews were responded to by the attending physician or prescriber for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Review and Reporting, revised January 2024, revealed, For recommendations that do not require physician intervention, the director of nursing or licensed designee will address the recommendations. Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a serious, common mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest, and fatigue, lasting at least two weeks and impairing daily life) and dementia (a general term for severe mental function loss). Review of Resident 's medical record revealed a recommendation made on September 9, 2025, by the consultant pharmacist to add an parameters for Resident 4's PRN (as needed) pain medication. Further review of the record failed to reveal that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy review, medical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to residents receiving tube feedings for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 8).Findings include:Review of facility policy, NSG213 Enteral Management, revised July 22, 2025, failed to reveal any expectation that tube feeding solution would be labeled with the name of the solution and date/time that the tube feeding was initiated.Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included Acute kidney failure (a sudden and often temporary loss of kidney function) and diabetes (a disease that affects how the body manages blood sugar).Observation of Resident on October 6, 2025, at 1:45 PM, revealed a bottle of beige liquid hanging at Resident 8's bedside in an open tube feeding set-up (bottle and tubing used to administer tube feedings). The bottle was not labeled with what tube feeding was contained inside, the initials of the individual who hung it, or the date and time that it was hung for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff implement infection control policies to prevent the spread of infection for one of eight residents on transmission-based precautions reviewed (Residents 7).Findings Include:Review of facility policy, IC308 Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), revised December 6, 2024, revealed that residents with a wound or indwelling medical device will be placed on EBP if they do not meet criteria to require contact precautions.Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included pressure ulcer of left heel (an injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure) and chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function).Review of Resident 7's care plan revealed a current care plan for skin breakdown related to impaired mobility, Pressure ulcer left heel stage 2, with a revision date of August 20, 2025.Observation of Resident 7's room on October 6, 2025, at 12:30 PM, revealed no sign on Resident 7's door…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal hygiene for three of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 20, 35, and 101). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled NSG200 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) [Activities of daily living or ADLs are routine tasks that each of us must perform every day to care for our bodies and ourselves independently] dated June 1, 1996, with a revision date of May 1, 2023, and a last review date of October 15, 2024, revealed 1. Patients are assessed upon admission, quarterly, and with any significant change to identify their status in all areas of ADL's and 4.2 A patient who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary level of ADL assistance to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of Resident 20's clinical record revealed diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure treatment and services, consistent with professional standards, to promote healing and prevent infection for two of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Residents 16 and 325). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled NSG236 Skin Integrity and Wound Management, with a last reviewed and revised date of October 15, 2024, revealed 6. The licensed nurse will: 6.5 Complete wound evaluation upon admission/readmission, new in-house acquired, weekly, and with any unanticipated decline in wounds. Review of Resident 16's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (heart failure that occurs when the heart does not relax properly between beats causing the heart to be unable to pump an adequate amount of blood to the body), chronic respiratory failure (long term condition in which the respiratory system is unable to adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body), and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for three of five residents reviewed for limited range of motion (Residents 35, 40, and 50). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Restorative Nursing Guidelines, dated April 1, 2024, read, in part, Restorative nursing services (RNP) refer to interventions that promote the patient's ability to adapt & adjust to living as independently & safety as possible. It includes interventions that promote the resident's ability to attain & maintain their maximum functional potential. RNP's include, but are not limited to: Active Range of Motion (AROM) & Passive Range of Motion (PROM). Developing a RNP includes patient need identification, program design, documentation & monitoring outcomes. The program must include documentation of the number of minutes spent per restorative session. Document daily restorative nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and utilize kitchen equipment in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and one of three nourishment areas. Findings include: Based on facility policy, titled Food and Nutrition Services 'Use By' Dating Guidelines, last reviewed October 15, 2024, read, in part, Guidelines apply regardless of storage location (e.g. kitchen, pantries, etc.). Thickened liquids- 'use by' date seven days after opening. Frozen shakes 'use by' date of fourteen days once thawed- use labels for individual items when removed from the carton. Based on facility policy, titled Food Brought in for Patients/Residents, last reviewed October 15, 2024, read, in part, Food brought to residents by family or visitors will be handled and stored in a safe and sanitary manner. Food items that require refrigeration must be labeled with a resident's name and date the food was brought in. Food will be held in refrigerator for up to three days following date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical record review, review of select facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required notices to the resident or their representatives following the end of their Medicare coverage for two of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices (Residents 28 and 108). Findings include: A Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form completed by the facility revealed that Medicare Part A coverage for Resident 28 started on December 9, 2024, and that her last covered day was January 6, 2025. The form indicated that the facility initiated discontinuation from Medicare Part A coverage and that the Resident's benefit days were not exhausted. Further review of the form indicated that a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF-ABN - a notice given to Medicare beneficiaries to convey that Medicare is not likely to provide coverage for a skilled service) was issued telephonically. Review of Resident 28's clinical record revealed that she remained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft for two of three discharged residents reviewed (Residents 105 and 106). Findings include: Review of Resident 105's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged from the facility to the hospital on November 12, 2024. Further review of the closed clinical record revealed no documented inventory of personal effects or accounting for Resident 105's personal effects following discharge. Review of Resident 106's clinical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and passed away at the facility on December 25, 2024. Further review of the closed clinical record revealed no documented inventory of personal effects, or accounting for Resident 106's personal effects following discharge. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on January 16, 2025, at 12:30 PM, she revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, review of incident investigation documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report the results of an abuse investigation within the specified timeframes for one of one abuse incidents reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse Prohibition, revised October 24, 2022, revealed, The Administrator or designee will report findings of all completed investigations within five (5) working days to the Department of Health using the state on-line reporting system or state-approved forms. Review of state form, PB-22 Report Form For Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property, completed by the facility, revealed that an alleged incident of neglect occurred on September 24, 2024. Further review of the form revealed that the facility became aware of the incident and began an abuse investigation on September 25, 2024. The investigation was concluded on September 26, 2024. Review of the form indicated that it was not completed and submitted to the Department of Health until October 7,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 8 and 36). Findings include: Review of Resident 8's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), chronic kidney disease (a condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident 8's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set- assessment tool utilized to identify residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial needs) with ARD (assessment reference date- last day of the assessment period) of December 4, 2024, revealed under Section N. Medications, Resident 8 was marked yes to indicate he received an anticoagulant. Review of Resident 8's Medicare 5 Day MDS with ARD of December 4, 2024, revealed under Section N, Resident 8 was marked yes to indicate he received an anticoagulant. Review of Resident 8's clinical record failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two of 27 resident records reviewed (Residents 29 and 47). Findings Include: Review of Resident 29's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and anxiety disorder (mental health conditions that involve persistent and excessive feelings of fear or worry). Review of Resident 29's current physician orders revealed an order for Buspirone hydrochloride (HCL) tablet 15 milligram (MG) - give one tablet by mouth two times a day for anxiety, with an original active date of July 19, 2024. Review of Resident 29's current physician orders revealed an order for Duloxetine HCL capsule delayed release particles 60 MG -give one capsule by mouth one time a day for depression, with an original active date of July 20, 2024. Review of Resident 29's current physician orders revealed an order for Enoxaparin Sodium Injection Solution Prefilled syringe 40 MG/0.4 milliliter - inject 40 MG intramuscularly every 24 hours for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the residents right to participate in the care planning process for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 19), and failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 50). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS416 Person-Centered Care Plan, dated November 28, 2016, with a revision date of October 24, 2022, and a last review date of October 15, 2024, revealed 7. Care plans will be: 7.2 Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, and as needed to reflect the response to care and changing needs and goals; and 9. The Center has the responsibility to assist patients to participate by: 9.3 Facilitating the inclusion of the patient/ resident representative(s) to attend. Review of Resident 19's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic pain, hypertension…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 71 and 88). Findings include: Review of Resident 71's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Review of Resident 71's December 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record) revealed a physician's order for Blood Glucose before meals - notify MD (Medical Director) if blood sugar less than 80 or blood sugar greater than 250 before meals for Glucose monitoring, with a start date of December 26, 2024. Review of Resident 71's December 2024 MAR revealed the following: On December 26, 2024, at 4:00 PM, Resident 71's blood sugar was 286. On December 31, 2024, at 6:00 AM, Resident 71's blood sugar was 316. On December 31, 2024, at 11:00 AM, Resident 71's blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based clinical record review, hospital record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician provided orders for the resident's immediate care and needs for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 325). Findings include: Review of Resident 325's clinical record on January 13, 2025, revealed diagnoses that included stage two chronic kidney disease (decreased ability of kidneys to filter toxins from the blood), diabetes mellitus type II (decrease in the body's ability to utilize insulin for the transport of glucose from the blood stream into the cells for nourishment), and a stage three pressure ulcer to the sacrum (wound of the skin that can extend to the deeper layers of the skin caused by pressure over a bony prominence). Review of Resident 325's clinical record revealed that Resident 325 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on January 7, 2025. Review of hospital documentation revealed that while Resident 325 was in the hospital, Resident 325 had a foley…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurate accounting of the final disposition of medications upon discharge for two of three closed records reviewed (Residents 105 and 107). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, Disposal of Medication Waste, revised July 1, 2024, revealed, Medications that cannot be returned to the pharmacy, discharged with the patient, or donated will be placed in medication disposal bins labeled .controlled substance waste. Review of facility policy, Collection Receptacles for Disposal of Medications, undated, revealed, When disposing of such controlled substances by transferring those substances into a collection receptacle, such disposal shall occur immediately, but no longer than three business days after the discontinuation of use by the resident/ultimate user. Discontinuation of use includes a permanent discontinuation of use as directed by the prescriber, as a result of the resident's transfer from the long-term care facility, or as a result of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the licensed pharmacist's report of a medication irregularity was reviewed and acted upon timely for two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 29 and 74). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Regimen Review, last reviewed October 15, 2024, read, in part, Medication Regimen Review (MRR) is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. The findings are communicated to the Director of Nursing (DON) or designee and the medical director. These findings are documented and filed with other consultant pharmacist recommendations in the resident's chart. Resident-specific MRR recommendations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy review, review of medication data sheets, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to discard expired medications in one of three medication carts (Arcadia); and failed to properly label drugs and biologics in one of three medication carts (3rd floor short hall cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Storage of Medications, with a last review date of October 15, 2024, revealed, 12. [in part] Note the date on the label for insulin vials and pens when first used; and 14. [in part] Outdated .medications are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures. Review of insulin degludec (a long-acting insulin used to manage diabetes) medication data sheet from Drugs.com revealed that this brand of insulin should be used or discarded within 56 days of opening. Review of insulin aspart (a fast-acting insulin used to lower blood sugar levels) medication data sheet from Drugs.com revealed that this brand of insulin should be used or discarded within 28 days of opening. Review of Medline Liquid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of infectious diseases for one of one treatment cart observed (Third floor treatment cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Description, last reviewed October 15, 2024, revealed it stated, .Implementation of Control Measures and Precautions includes basics such as hand hygiene, Standard and Transmission Based Precautions, cleaning/disinfecting equipment and measures to protect persons [sic] from communicable diseases or infections. Review of Resident 325's clinical record on January 13, 2025, revealed diagnoses that included stage two chronic kidney disease (decreased ability of kidneys to filter toxins from the blood), diabetes mellitus type II (decrease in the body's ability to utilize insulin for the transport of glucose from the blood stream into the cells for nourishment), and a stage three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, laboratory result review, facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program was implemented for one of two residents reviewed for antibiotic use (Resident 98). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled IC402 Antibiotic Stewardship, last revision date of December 16, 2024, revealed the facility policy stated, Centers will implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) as part of the facility's overall infection and control program . The policy's included purpose stated, To reduce inappropriate antibiotic use and prevent the development of antibiotic-resistant organisms. Review of the policy's Process section revealed the program included the following: 1. The Medical Director, [Director of Nursing], and Consultant Pharmacist serve as the leaders of the ASP and receive support from the Administrator and other governing officials of the Center. 1.1 The Medical director .Sets the standards for antibiotic prescribing practices for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for four of 12 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 9, 10, and 12). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Medication Administration Section 7.1 General Guidelines, dated January 2024, revealed Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices; 1. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber .14. medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time. Observation of third floor on July 25, 2024, at 11:30 AM, revealed that Employee 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN]) and Employee 2 (LPN) were administering medications to residents. During an interview with Employee 1 on July 25, 2024, at 11:31 AM, Employee 1 indicated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for three of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 25, 54, and 65). Findings include: Review of Resident 25's clinical record on February 5, 2024, at approximately 1:00 PM, revealed diagnoses that included diabetes type II (decreased ability of the body to utilize insulin for the transport of glucose from the blood stream into the cells for nourishment) and hypertension (elevated/high blood pressure). Review of Resident 25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - standardized assessment tool utilized to identify a resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs), with an assessment reference date of December 17, 2023, revealed that section M - Skin Conditions, subsection M300 - Current Number of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries at Each Stage was coded to reflect Resident 25 had one stage II pressure ulcer (injury of the skin that is caused by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed for three of 25 residents reviewed (Residents 42, 55, and 73). Findings include: Review of Resident 42's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life) and diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood [high blood glucose]). Review of Resident 42's progress notes from January 22, 2024, at 11:09 AM, revealed a progress note written by Employee 3 (Physician), that revealed Resident 42 had dementia and the plan of care was to, continue with supportive care. Review of Resident 42's MDS (Minimum Data Set evaluation), dated December 29, 2023, revealed in section I4800 that Resident 42 has an active diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's dementia, meaning that the condition required and received treatment within the previous seven days. Review of Resident 42's care plan on February 5, 2024, failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services are provided in accordance with professional standards of practice that will meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 51). Findings include: Review of Resident 51's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (ESRD-condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis), dependence on renal dialysis (external filtering of the blood performed by a machine by removing the blood and replacing it), and adult failure to thrive (a past history of weight loss of more than five percent, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and physical inactivity, often associated with dehydration, depression, immune dysfunction). Review of Resident 51's physician orders revealed an order for daily weights, dated April 18, 2023. Review of Resident 51's weights in their electronic health record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication for one of one residents reviewed (Resident 51). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled NSG253 Dialysis: Hemodialysis (HD) - Communication and Documentation, with a last review date of January 17, 2024, indicated, in part, Center staff will communicate with the certified dialysis facility regarding the ongoing assessment of the patient's condition by monitoring for complications before and after hemodialysis (HD) treatments received at a certified dialysis facility. 1. Prior to a patient leaving the Center for HD, a licensed nurse will complete the top portion of the Hemodialysis Communication Record or the state required form and send with the patient to his/her HD facility visit. 2. Following completion of the HD, the dialysis facility nurse should complete and return the form and return it or other communication to the Center with the patient. 3. Upon return of the patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the clinical record accurately reflected the resident preference for code status for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 18). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Health Care Decision Making, last revised [DATE], revealed purpose - to provide patient the opportunity and knowledge necessary to make his/her health care decisions known and to assure that patients' wishes concerning health care decisions are communicated to all staff so that patients' rights will be honored and their wishes will be executed at the appropriate time. Review of Resident 18's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning) and rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue that leads to the release of muscle fiber contents into the blood). Further review of Resident 18's clinical record on February 6, 2024, at 10:04 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to review and revise the resident plan of care for two of 24 residents reviewed (Residents 51 and 65). Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled OPS416 Person-Centered Care Plan, dated November 28, 2016, with a last review date of January 17, 2024, revealed, in part, 7. Care plans will be: .7.2. Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, and as needed to reflect the response to care and changing needs and goals. Review of Resident 51's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (ESRD-condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis), peripheral vascular disease (disease of the vascular system that results in decreased blood flow to the extremities), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 51's care plan revealed a care plan focus for a right heel pressure ulcer, with a last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS PM PA OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/14/2022
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/14/2022
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
ANJUM, RASHIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/14/2025
HOLTRY, RANDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/14/2025
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 18%Other / private 19%

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,466per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$380per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395440. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next