Chambersburg Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ce

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 198 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 168 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 175.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.547 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident abuse by a resident with a history of abuse (Resident 1). This resulted in actual physical harm by Resident 1, as evidenced by multiple skin tears and bruising of a resident (Resident 2). Effective interventions were not put into place to protect residents from physical and psychosocial abuse. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation.Findings include: Facility policy, titled Abuse Prohibition, revised November 15, 2025, read in part, 5. Actions to prevent abuse.will include: 5.2 identifying, correcting, and interviewing in situations in which abuse.is more likely to occur. 6. Staff will identify events - such as suspicious bruising, occurrences, patterns, and trends that may constitute abuse - and determine the direction of the investigation. This also includes patient-to-patient abuse.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice for three of 38 residents reviewed (Residents 2, 23, and 163).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Medication Administration - General Guidelines last reviewed March 2026, stated, The client (resident) is always observed after administration to ensure that the dose was completely ingested. Review of facility policy, titled Procedure: Wound Dressings: Aseptic, last reviewed March 2026, read, in part, Document: Treatment on Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Review of Resident 2's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a condition characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform everyday activities) and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident 2's physician orders revealed the following: Order 1: Vashe Wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility assessment, clinical record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a member of the Food and Nutrition Services staff participates on the interdisciplinary team as required for two of 38 residents reviewed (Residents 7 and 105). Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment (a comprehensive evaluation that determines the resources and capabilities needed to provide quality care to residents, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards), read, in part, Nutrition/Hydration: Dining: Discuss dining to ensure systems are in place to provide an enjoyable, dignified, and sanitary dining experience.Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (a condition where the protective cartilage that cushions the ends of the bones wears down over time) and need for assistance with personal care. During an interview with Resident 7 on May 6, 2026, at 2:14 PM, she revealed she didn't care for what she was served for breakfast that morning, and that she had concerns…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor freezer temperatures in four of four (Station 1, Station 2, Station 3, and Arcadia) nourishment pantries; failed to maintain clean refrigerators in four nourishment pantries (Station 1, Station 2, Station 3, and Arcadia); and failed to discard food items brought in for residents in one of four nourishment areas (Station 3).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled FNS402 Refrigeration/Freezer Temperature Standards, last reviewed March 2026, revealed, The Director of Dining Services/Director of Culinary Services or designee observes and records the temperatures of refrigerators and freezers on a daily basis using the Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log. Temperatures are not taken during the defrost cycle. Review of Station 1, Station 2, Station 3, and Arcadia Refrigerator/Freezer logs on May 4, 2026, from 10:27 AM to 10:45 AM, with Employee 4 (Dietary Manager), failed to reveal that any freezer temperatures had been checked or recorded for the month of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident status for three of 38 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 15, and 18). Findings include: Review of Resident 7's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (a condition where the protective cartilage that cushions the ends of the bones wears down over time) and need for assistance with personal care. During an interview with Resident 7 on May 5, 2026, at 10:15 AM, she revealed her right foot was impaired and she was unable to walk on it. Review of Resident 7's Physical Therapy Evaluation from March 26, 2026, noted that her right lower extremity was impaired at her ankle. Review of Resident 7's Quarterly MDS assessment (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool to review all care areas specific to the resident such as a resident's physical, mental or psychosocial needs) with ARD (assessment reference date- last day of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, and do not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and to promote healing and prevent infection of a pressure ulcer for two of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Residents 17 and 23).Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Procedure: Wound Dressings: Aseptic, last reviewed March 2026, read, in part, Document: Treatment on Treatment Administration Record (TAR). Review of Resident 17's clinical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease stage 3B (moderate to severe loss of kidney function) and protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein and calories, leading to reduced body weight, muscle atrophy, and impaired function). Review of Resident 17's physician orders revealed the following orders, bilateral buttocks:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment that supports infection prevention and control during the medication administration for one of five residents observed (Resident 186).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Hand Hygiene last reviewed March 2026, it stated, Perform hand hygiene: Before patient/resident (hereinafter 'patient') care and after contact with the patient's environment. Review of the facility policy, titled Medication Administration - General Guidelines last reviewed March 2026, stated, Hands are washed with soap and water and gloves applied before administration of topical (skin), ophthalmic (eye), otic (ear), parenteral (intravenous, intramuscular, subcutaneous, intradermal), enteral (by mouth, nasogastric or gastric tube), rectal, and vaginal medications. Hands are washed with soap and water again after administration with any client (resident) contact. Antimicrobial sanitizer may be used in place of soap and water as allowed per state nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy and procedure review, clinical record reviews, facility provided documentation reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled NSG 204 Neurological Evaluation, with a last revised date of January 15, 2026, revealed, in part, The evaluation shall include: Vital signs; General condition and appearance; Neurological evaluation for changes in: Physical functioning, Behavior, Cognition, Level of consciousness, Dizziness, Nausea, Irritability, Slurred speech or slow to answer questions, Changes in vision, hearing, or smelling. Review of facility procedure, titled Neurological Evaluation, with a last revised date of April 22, 2026, revealed, in part, 11. Document: 11.1 LOC, orientation, ability to follow commands, response to sensation and/or pain, pupil reaction, motor function, temperature, pulse, respiration, and blood pressure on Neurological Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and select guidelines, it was determined that the facility failed to discontinue/alter medication dosage and/or to ensure the risks were known with refusal of monitoring to prevent hyperkalemia (elevated potassium level) for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: A review of Food and Drug Administration guideline, last approved October 27, 2025, for use of Potassium Chloride ER (extended release) tablets stated, the use of potassium salts in patients with chronic renal disease, or any other condition which impairs potassium excretion, requires particularly careful monitoring of the serum potassium concentration and appropriate dosage adjustment. Based on National Institutes of Health guidelines, dated October 5, 2024, severe hypokalemia (<3mEq/L): For oral administration initiate at 40 mEq (milliequivalents- a unit of measure for concentration of electrolytes in body) 3 to 4 times daily or 20 mEq every 2 to 3 hours. The dose should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, product label, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food and beverages in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and three of four nourishment areas. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Food Brought in for Patients/Residents last revised January 26, 2024, read, in part, Food brought to residents by family or visitors will be handled and stored in a safe and sanitary manner. Food items that require refrigeration must be labeled with the resident's name and date the food was brought in. Food will be held in refrigerator for three days following the date on the label and will be discarded by staff upon notification to resident. Observation in Reach-in Refrigerator 1 on April 27, 2025, at 9:52 AM, revealed one container of thickened lemon water open and not dated with an open date; and one container of thickened lemon water open with an open date of April 2, 2025. Further observation of the thickened beverage containers read After opening, may…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, review of select facility documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and home-like environment in one of 35 resident rooms reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Resident Rights Under Federal Law last revised February 1, 2023, read, in part, The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility must provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Interview with Resident 368 on April 27, 2025, at 12:29 PM, revealed he was disappointed about the condition of the wallpaper in his bathroom, and it had been that was since he was admitted to the room on April 21, 2025. Observation in Resident 368's bathroom on April 27, 2025, at 12:32 PM, revealed the wallpaper was coming away from the wall in several areas, rippling under the sink, and torn behind the toilet. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on April 29, 2025, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA