Belvedere Center, Genesis Healthcare, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 131.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's policy, facility documentation, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor resident's skin condition and follow wound physician's treatment orders/recommendations resulting in harm to Resident CL1 of discovering the wound at an advanced Stage 3 (full thickness loss of skin that extends into the subcutaneous tissue but does not cross the fascia beneath), wound deterioration, and unnecessary pain/discomfort for one of two residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management, reviewed May 1, 2024, revealed that nursing assistants will observe skin daily and report any changes or concerns to the nurse. The licensed nurse will evaluate any reported or suspected skin change or wounds and perform daily monitoring of wounds or dressing for the presence of complications or declines. Implement wound care treatments/techniques as indicated and ordered. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-10-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility investigative documentation, clinical and hospital records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of 24 residents was free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm to Resident 120, through Employee E3's failure to report a fall to registered nurse, the resident experienced a delay in assessment, treatment, and subsequent hospitalization for intracranial hemorrhage (brain bleed) resulting in death. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse Prohibition, last revised [DATE], revealed: Neglect is defined as the failure, indifference, or disregard of the Center, its employees, or service providers to provide care, comfort, safety, goods and services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. This includes the failure to implement an effective communication system across all shifts for communicating necessary care and information between Center, patient, practitioners, and patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's policy, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and provide wound treatment timely and consistently resulting in harm of a new pressure ulcer discovered at an advanced stage (Stage 3- Full-thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue) for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 54). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management, dated February 1, 2023, revealed the purpose is to provide safe and effective care to promote optimal skin health, prevent pressure injuries, and promote healing within the context of what matters most to all patients. Further review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management, dated February 1, 2023, revealed residents will be observed by the NA (nurse aide) daily. Changes or concerns will be reported to the licensed nurse, who will evaluate any reported or suspected skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based upon observation, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled with open and expiration dates for three of four medication carts observed (North Back Hall Cart, North Front Cart and South Middle Cart).Findings include:Review of package insert instructions for Humalog (Lispro) Insulin Pens revealed unopened Humalog pens should be stored in the refrigerator.Further review of package insert instructions for Humalog Insulin Pens revealed that once opened, Humalog can be kept at room temperature for up to 28 days. Review of package insert instruction for Lantus Insulin revealed Lantus Insulin should be used within 28 days after opening. Review of package insert instruction for Lantus (glargine) Insulin revealed Lantus Insulin should be used within 28 days after opening.Observation of the North Back Hall Medication Cart on August 15, 2025, at 9:12 a.m. revealed one open Lispro Insulin Pen with no open or expiration date; three open Lantus Insulin Pens with no open or expiration date; one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital for 1 of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 134). Findings include: Review of facility records revealed a policy titled Discharge and Transfer dated June 11, 2025, noting for patients transferred to a hospital for unplanned, acute transfers, the patient must be permitted to return to the facility. Prior to the transfer, the patient and patient representative will be notified verbally followed by written notification using the Notice of Hospital Transfer or state specific transfer form. Copies of notices for emergency transfers must also be sent to the Ombudsman, but they may be sent when practicable, such as in a list of patients on a monthly basis or per state requirement. A review of Resident 134's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on July 21, 2025, due to change of condition and decline in activities of daily living. There was no documented evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within 14 days after a significant change in the resident's condition for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 90).Findings include:Review of Resident 90's physician's orders revealed an order on June 19, 2025, for Compassus Hospice for evaluation and treatment. Review of the resident's progress note of June 20, 2025, revealed resident assessed by Compassus Hospice and has been admitted to their services. Further review of clinical record revealed that a significant change MDS (Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident needs) was completed on June 20, 2025; however, Section O0110 - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs indicated that the resident was not receiving hospice care. Review of Resident 90's progress note of June 23, 2025, revealed that Compassus Hospice nurse stated that resident's admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 95 and 113).Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for two of 26 residents reviewed (Residents 95 and 113). Findings include: Review of Resident 95's clinical record revealed the resident was receiving dialysis. Review of Resident 95's quarterly MDS assessment (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated July 3, 2025, Section O0110 – Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs indicated that the resident was not receiving dialysis. Interview with licensed staff Employee E3 on August 15, 2025, at 11:50 a.m. confirmed Resident 95 was receiving dialysis and the resident's MDS was coded incorrectly. Review of Resident 113's clinical record revealed the resident was receiving hospice care. Review of Resident 113's admissions MDS assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on policy review, and clinical records review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding administration of medications for one of 26 resident (Resident 3) Findings include: Review of medication administration general guidelines section 7.1 dated 01/25-page three of six Medication Administration section 1. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed there was a current physician's order for the resident to be receiving Midodrine HCl Oral Tablet 10 MG (Midodrine HCl) (Midodrine is used to treat low blood pressure), Give 1 tablet via PEG-Tube (Peg tube A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a surgery to place a feeding tube. Feeding tubes, or PEG tubes, allow you to receive nutrition through your stomach.) three times a day for Hypotension Hold for SBP (Systolic blood pressure also known as SBP is the top number in a blood pressure reading, indicating the pressure in your arteries when your…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based upon observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked when a staff member was not in attendance for one of four medication carts observed (North Hall Front Cart).Findings include:Observation on August 15, 2025, at 9:16 a.m. revealed the North Hall Front Medication Cart to be open and unlocked with no staff members in attendance. Four residents were observed in the hallway at the time of the observation.During the observation, the cart was able to be opened, and medications were able to be viewed and examined by a surveyor. Licensed employee was observed in a resident room with employee's back to the cart and not able to observe the cart that was left unattended and unlocked.The above information was conveyed to the Director of Nursing on August 15, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing ServicesPreviously cited 7/18/2024, 8/23/2024

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain resident dignity for one of one residents (Resident 80). Findings include: Review of Resident 80's Minimum Data Set (MDS, Standardized assessment used to collect information about a resident for quality measure) with a date of completion of May 9, 2024, revealed Resident 80 possesses a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 8 (indicating moderate cognitive impairment). Additional review of Resident 80's MDS revealed under section 8 (Hearing, Speech, and Vision) that Resident 80 has difficulty understanding others and difficulty communicating with others. Review of Resident 80's medical diagnosis revealed an active diagnosis of Other Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (brain bleed caused from a stroke that caused memory loss, difficulty speaking and understanding .). Observations conducted on July 15, 2024, at 9:45 a.m. revealed a sign on Resident 80 [NAME] indicating, Resident 80 FALL RISK. Observations conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the advanced directives were accurately reflected in residents' records for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident 79). Findings include: Review of Resident 79's clinical records revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and review of clinical record revealed diagnoses including Chronic Kidney Disease, Malignant Neoplasm of Prostate (prostate cancer), Bradycardia (slow heart rate), Cardiac Arrhythmia (irregular heartbeat), Urethral Stricture (narrowing of the urethra), Obstructive and Reflex Uropathy (blockage in urinary tract), Urine Retention, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (enlarged prostate), Hypertension (high blood pressure) and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility (changes in walking pattern). Continued review of Resident 79's clinical record revealed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) scored of five which indicating the resident was severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for one of the 30 residents reviewed (Resident 110). Findings include: Review of Resident 110's clinical record revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Acute Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Absence of Left Leg Above Knee. Review of Resident 110's clinical records revealed physician orders dated July 3, 2024, documenting the following orders: Pulse Oxygen every shift to keep oxygen sats greater than or equal to 90%. Clean external filter on oxygen concentrator. Oxygen tube change weekly, label each component with date and initials. Oxygen at 2L/min via Nasal Cannula, continuously. Review of Resident 110's clinical records revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documenting the resident required oxygen therapy on admission and while in the facility. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents had comprehensive care plans for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 113). Findings include: Review of Resident 113's admission elopement assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident scored a 6, indicating the resident was an elopement risk. Review of Resident 113's elopement assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident scored a 1, indicating the resident was an elopement risk. Review of Resident 113's care plan failed to reveal a plan of care addressing the resident's risk for elopement. The above findings were discussed with and confirmed with the Director of Nursing on July 18, 2024, at 10:05 a.m. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$89,766 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $37,902 — penalty dated 2024-07-18
• $51,864 — penalty dated 2023-10-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA