King Of Prussia Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation
600 West Valley Forge Road, King of Prussia, PA 19406 · For profit - Corporation · 170 certified beds · (610) 337-1775 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $3,145 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 37% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.5% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.8% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.9% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.3% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.3% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.7% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.3% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 35.0% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.0% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.9% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.57 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.44 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.3%CMS range 46.4–60.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.8%CMS range 6.4–12.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 80.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 85.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.4%CMS range 7.5–14.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 140.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility's policy, facility documentation, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow wound physician's treatment orders/recommendations and provide consistent and appropriate treatment for an Unstageable Pressure Ulcer on the right heel (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss), resulting in wound deterioration and actual harm for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident 1)Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management, reviewed September 15, 2025, revealed Staff will continually observe and monitor patients for changes and implement revisions to the plan of care as needed. Review of Resident 1's diagnosis list includes Dementia (term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities severely enough to interfere with daily life), Anemia (lower than normal amount of healthy red blood cells) and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility (person exhibits irregularities in walking and movement but the exact cause cannot be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors, resulting in actual harm when Resident R1 required transfer to the hospital with the need for intubation and admission to the Intensive Care Unit, this was found to be a past noncompliance incident for one of 15 residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration, dated January 2025, revealed that prior to medication administration, staff are required to review and confirm medication orders for each resident on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and compare the medication label with the MAR.Review of Rights of Medication Administration, revealed the following:Right patient: you must have 2 resident identifiers prior to administering medications (examples: photo, name band, name/DOB verification)Right drug: this requires a triple check to ensure accuracyRight dose: this requires a triple check to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the physician's order for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).Findings: A review of Resident 1's nursing progress notes dated February 4, 2026, at 8:06 p.m., revealed Resident 1 had a rash on the right front axilla (armpit). A review of Resident 1's physician's order dated February 4, 2026, revealed an order for Permethrin External Cream (A medication used primarily to treat scabies, a contagious skin infestation caused by mites) 5% apply to the body, neck to feet topically one time only for a dermatological rash for one day. Leave for eight hours and shower, repeat in seven days (February 12, 2026). A review of Resident 1's February 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the medication Permethrin was not administered to the resident on February 4, 2026, and February 12, 2026. A review of Resident 1's nursing progress notes dated February 5, 2026, at 10:21 a.m., revealed medication Permethrin not administered. No further reason was documented. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observations and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to properly store medications for one resident reviewed. (Resident R6) Findings include:Review of facility policy storage of Medication dated January 2025. Revealed The provider pharmacy dispenses medications in containers that meet state and federal labeling requirements, including those established by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP). Medications are to remain in these containers and stored in a controlled environment. This may include such containers as medication carts, medication rooms, medication cabinets, or other suitable containers.During an onsite investigation conducted on January 29, 2026, at approximately 10:15 a.m., an unidentified pill on the floor outside the entrance of Resident R6's room.The pill was not labeled, packaged, or stored in a secure medication container.Interview with licensed employee E13 conducted on January 29, 2026, at 12:20 p.m. revealed staff were unable to identify the pill and could not determine which resident, if any, the medication was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, policy reviews, and clinical closed record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure ombudsman notification procedures were followed for one of one resident reviewed. (Resident 6), and to document return of personal items upon discharge or death for two of three residents reviewed (Resident 139 and 140).Findings Include: Review of Resident 6’s clinical record revealed diagnoses including pulmonary embolism. (A pulmonary embolism (PE) is a blood clot in one of the blood vessels in your lung.) Interview with Director of Nursing on [DATE] at 10:02 AM confirmed no notification was sent to ombudsman Review of facility policy titled Personal Property: Patient's revealed, personnel will identify and record the resident's belongings upon admission to the facility. Return of any personal property remaining in the facility must be made within 30 days after discharge or death. Review of nursing notes for Resident 139, dated [DATE], documents the resident was discharged to [NAME] Hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly follow physician orders for two of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 6 and 29).Finding include: Review of Resident 6’s clinical record revealed diagnoses including essential hypertension. (Primary (essential) hypertension is high blood pressure that is multi-factorial and doesn’t have one distinct cause.) Review of Resident 6’s physician's orders revealed Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 MG (Metoprolol Tartrate) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for HTN Hold for SBP < 130 Review of Resident 6’s medication administration record (MAR) for the month of May 2025, June 2025, and July 2025 revealed the facility administered the above medication eight times outside of parameters. The facility failed to ensure Resident 6’s medication order Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 25 MG was administered as ordered. The above information was conveyed to the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing on July 17, 2025 at 11:32 am. Review of the facility’s “Pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon review of facility policy and procedure and review of clinical records, it was determined the facility failed to ensure weight loss and weight gain was adequately monitored for two of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 8, Resident 60). Finding include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Weights and heights, revised July 15, 2025, revealed Based on patients’ comprehensive assessment, the center will ensure that all patients maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight, unless the patient clinical condition demonstrates that is not possible for the patients' preferences to indicate otherwise Review of Resident 8’s diagnosis list revealed diagnoses including Gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. (Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) happens when acidic stomach contents flow back into the esophagus.) Review of Resident 8’s physician orders dated July seventh, 2025, revealed an order for weights every Monday. Review of Resident 8's Weight Summary revealed July 1, 2025; Resident 8 weighed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and policy and procedures review, it was determined the facility failed to follow a physician's order for oxygen therapy for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 10). Findings include:Review of facility policy, titled Procedure: OXYGEN: NASAL CANNULA revision date 08/07/2023 revealed place oxygen source in room according to equipment specific procedure.Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed there was a current physician's order for the resident to be receiving oxygen therapy via a nasal cannula. The cannula was to be used continuously.Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed the following nursing statement. The resident also is on continuous oxygen, however O2 was not in use during ambulation. Staff and therapist were re-educated on ensuring oxygen is maintained during all mobility activities, including with portable tanks when appropriate.Interview conducted with the Director of Physical therapy, Employee E3, at 07/18/2025 12:51 PM, when they were informed of the above information and deficient practice was identified.The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to document medication disposition for one of three discharged residents. (Resident 139). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Disposal of Medication Waste, documents all medications will be disposed of in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations for the disposal of chemical and potentially dangerous or hazardous pharmaceuticals. Medication for disposal includes medications which are not taken with the resident upon discharge. Medications that cannot be returned to the pharmacy, discharged with the resident, or donated will be placed in medication disposal bins labeled controlled substance waste. A licensed pharmaceutical waste disposal company will remove medication waste.Review of resident 139's clinical records revealed physician orders that included Morphine Sulfate Oral Tablet 15 MG (for pain).Review of Resident 139's clinical records revealed a progress note dated April…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment (dishwasher and sink faucet) in safe, operating condition. Findings include:Observation of the facility's main kitchen on 7/14/2025, between 6:13p.m. and 6:25 p.m., revealed a puddle of water on the floor by the dishwasher. During an interview at the time of the observation, Employee 6 indicated that the puddle of water was due to a drain issue and that maintenance was made aware three month ago. Observations of the use of the sink faucet by the dishwasher on 7/15/2025 at 9:25am revealed a puddle of water on the floor and leak in the faucet. Interview with the Maintenance Director on 7/15/2025 at 9:36am confirmed that there was a leaking faucet and were made aware of it a month ago (June 2025) and stated that there was an issue with the water line.Review of work orders provided revealed a work order for faucet repair was put in on 7/15/2025.Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on 7/16/2025 at 2:11pm confirmed the above findings. 28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and clinical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to report one resident's hospital transfer due to consumption of a liquid soap product. (Resident 2) Findings include: Review of resident's clinical records revealed medical diagnoses that include Dementia (loss of cognitive functions), Heart Failure (heart can't pump enough blood to meet body's needs), Hypertension (pressure in blood vessels are to high), Stage 3 Kidney Disease (mild to moderate kidney damage), Anxiety (overwhelming sense of apprehension or fear), and Major Depressive Disorder (persistent low or depressed mood, loss of interest). Review of facility records revealed an incident report dated December 31, 2024, documenting Certified Nursing Employee E3 reported to Licensed Nursing Employee E4 that a Resident 2 was observed with a bottle of soap up to his/her mouth. Resident 2 was found by Licensed Nursing Employee E4 lying in bed, cringing with eyes closed and clammy to touch. The physician was notified, and orders were given to send Resident 2 to the hospital. Resident 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, facility personnel records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for new hires and existing staff. Findings include: Interview conducted with the Staff Educator Employee (E7) on August 15, 2024, at 12:45 p.m. reported she was unable to provide a facility policy regarding an effective training program for all new and existing staff. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on August 15, 2024, at 1:05 p.m. confirmed the facility failed to develop a training program for all new and existing staff. 28 Pa Code: 201.14 (a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa Code: 201.18 (b)(1) Management. 28 Pa Code: 201.20 (a)(c) Staff development.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on effective communication for four out of five staff members (Employee E3, Employee E4, Employee E5, Employee E6,). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff member did not have documented training on effective communication. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E3 had a hire date of July 9, 2024, failed to have effective communication training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E4 had a hire date of June 25, 2024, failed to have effective communication training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E5 had a hire date of July 9, 2024, failed to have effective communication training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Dietary Aid Employee E6 had a hire date of July 29, 2024, failed to have effective communication training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. During an interview on August 15, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0942 — widespreadEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of new hire personnel records and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Resident Rights for four out of five staff members (Employee E3, Employee E4, Employee E5, Employee E6, Employee E7). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff member did not have documented training on Resident Rights. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E3 had a hire date of July 9, 2024, failed to have Resident Rights training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E4 had a hire date of June 25, 2024, failed to have Resident Rights training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E5 had a hire date of July 9, 2024, failed to have Resident Rights training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Dietary Aid Employee E6 had a hire date of July 29, 2024, failed to have Resident Rights training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Interview conducted with the Staff Educator Employee E7 on August 15, 2024, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and a review of facility training and orientation records, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on the facility's abuse prohibition policy and facility specific procedures for one out of five new hires (Employee E6). Findings include: Review of Dietary Aid Employee E6's personnel record revealed he/she had a hire date of July 29, 2024. Further review of the personnel record failed to provide evidence that Dietary Aid E6 received training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Interview conducted with the Staff Educator Employee E7 on August 15, 2024, at 12:45 p.m. reported she was unable to provide evidence the employees above received training regarding abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Interview on August 15, 2024 at 1:05 p.m. conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed the above. 28 Pa Code 201.20(b) Staff Development 28 Pa Code 201.18(e)(1) Management 28 Pa Code 201.29(a)(c) Resident Rights
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review personnel records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on Infection Control for four out of five new hires (Employee E3, Employee E4, Employee E5, and Employee E6). Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff member did not have documented training on Infection Control. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E3 had a hire date of July 9, 2024, failed to have Infection Control training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E4 had a hire date of June 25, 2024, failed to have Infection Control training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E5 had a hire date of July 9, 2024, failed to have Infection Control training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Dietary Aid Employee E6 had a hire date of July 29, 2024, failed to have Infection Control training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Interview conducted with the Staff Educator Employee E7 on August 15, 2024, at 12:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel file for nursing assistants employed by the facility, it was determined the facility failed to ensure consistent in-service training and competencies were completed as required for one of five personnel files reviewed. (Employee E13) Findings include: Review of documentation of annual performance evaluations and logs of regular in-service training and competencies for Employee E13 failed to reveal ongoing training or annual evaluation. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, and Director of Nursing at 1:30 p.m., on August 15, 2024, confirmed that Employee E13 was the only nursing assistant employed with the facility for over twelve consecutive months. Further interview with the Nursing Home Administrator revealed that there was no documentation of nurse aide in-services at least twelve hours in a year, including dementia training, abuse prevention training, areas of weakness as determined in the nursing aide's performance review, facility assessment, special needs of residents and care of cognitively impaired residents for Employee E13. 28 Pa.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespreadProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents, employee education records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training on behavioral health for four out of five staff members (Employee E3, Employee E4, Employee E5, and Employee E6) Findings include: Review of facility provided documents and training records revealed the following staff member did not have documented training on Behavioral Health. Nurse Aide (NA) Employee E3 had a hire date of July 9, 2024, failed to have Behavioral Health training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Employee E4 had a hire date of June 25, 2024, failed to have Behavioral Health training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Registered Nurse (RN) Employee E5 had a hire date of July 9, 2024, failed to have Behavioral Health training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Dietary Aid Employee E6 had a hire date of July 29, 2024, failed to have Behavioral Health training between August 16, 2023, and August 15, 2024. Interview conducted with the Staff Educator Employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse for one of the 29 residents reviewed (Resident 54). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition with review date of February 23, 2021, revealed the center will implement an abuse prohibition program through the identification of possible incidents or allegations that need investigations. The same policy revealed that upon receiving a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment, or neglect, the designee will initiate an investigation that focuses on whether abuse or neglect occurred and to what extent. The investigation will be thoroughly documented, ensure that documentation of witnessed interviews will be included. Review of Resident 54's diagnosis list includes Cerebrovascular Disease (stroke), and Anxiety disorder. Review of Resident 54's plan of care revealed resident was resistive and non-compliant with care. Review of Resident 54's Minimum Data Set (MDS- A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer to the hospital for four of eight residents reviewed (Residents 17, 96, 332, and 333). Findings include: Rview of Resident 17's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on May 4, 2024, due to two episodes of vomiting and weakness. There was no documented evidence to indicate the facility provided a written notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman regarding the resident's hospitalization. Review of Resident 96's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on August 10, 2024, due to a fall with laceration to the forehead. There was no documented evidence to indicate the facility provided a written notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman regarding the resident's hospitalization. Review of Resident 332's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on April 5, 2024, for a clogged feeding tube and shoulder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set assessments for one of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 25). Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which gives instructions for completing Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), revealed that Section O0110 was to be completed with the resident's special treatments, procedures, and programs, and Section O0110 was to be coded for the use of Tracheostomy(a medical procedure that involves creating an opening in the neck in order to place a tube into a person's trachea, or windpipe) Care. Column (2) was to be checked if Tracheostomy Care was used while a resident of the facility within the last 14 days. Review of Resident 25's care plan, revised on July 11, 2024, indicated that the resident at risk for respiratory impairment related to tracheostomy. Physician's orders for Resident 25, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the minimum information necessary to properly care for a resident, for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 333). Findings include: Review of Resident 333's clinical records revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on July 9, 2024, with medical diagnoses that include Seizures, Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (bleeding into the brain), Acute Respiratory Failure, Gastrostomy (creation of an artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support), Hepatic Encephalopathy (loss of brain function), Cirrhosis of Liver with Ascites (fluid in abdomen), and Rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of skeletal muscle). Review of Resident 333's physician orders dates July 9, 2024, to cleanse sacral wound with spray, apply calcium alginate and cover with foam dressing, Review of Resident 333's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it as determined the facility failed to administer medications as ordered to one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 20) Findings Include: Review of Resident 20's physician orders revealed an order for Midodrine (increases blood pressure) 5 milligrams (mg) three times a day (TID) for hypotension (low blood pressure) hold for systolic blood pressure greater than 140. Review of Resident 20's Medications Administration Record (MAR) from August 1-13 2024 revealed the resident received the midodrine four times when the systolic blood pressure was above 140. Review of Resident 20's MAR for the entire month of July 2024 revealed the resident received the midodrine 13 times when the systolic blood pressure was above 140. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 15, 2024 at 11:30 a.m. confirmed the medication was not administered as ordered by the physician. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for two of the 29 residents reviewed (Resident 54 and 127). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management with a revised date of May 1, 2024, revealed that the licensed nurse will perform daily monitoring of wound dressing for the presence of complications and declines, implement skin/wound care guidelines, and implement special wound care treatments as indicated and ordered. Review of Resident 54's wound consult report dated July 29, 2024, revealed that the resident had a Stage 4 Pressure Ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) to the sacrum (tail bone) measuring 1.8 x 0.6 x 0.1 cm. The wound order recommendation was to cleanse the sacral wound with a normal saline solution and apply Calcium Alginate (wound dressing that absorbs excess moisture and promotes healing), and Puracol (wound product that contains collagen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Facility policy and procedure review, clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent a potential elopement for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident 101) Findings Include: Review of Facility policy and procedure titled Wandering, last revised May 1, 2022, revealed wandering behavior symptoms will be documented on the Behavior Monitoring and Intervention Flow Record or Behavior Tracking Form. Forms will be reviewed to determine triggers associated with the behavior and effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions. Behavior symptoms will be addressed in the care/service plan. Review of Resident 101's progress notes revealed a social service entry dated July 26, 2024 at 2:17 p.m. stating, resident also reported that she tried to escape this joint and admitted to going into the staircase and attempt to walk upstairs. Further review of Resident 101's clinical record revealed there were no assessments completed to determine the residents risk for elopement and no care plan developed with interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and procedure review, observations, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services for foley catheters for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident 20) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Catheter: Urinary-Justification for Use, last revised August 7, 2023, revealed Patients who have urinary catheters upon admission or subsequently receive one will be assessed for removal of the catheter as soon as possible unless the patients clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization is necessary. If the patients condition meets any of the indwelling catheter criteria, obtain a physician order, include in care plan. Observation of Resident 20 on August 12, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. revealed the resdient had a Foley Catheter (tube placed into the bladder to drain urine). Review of Resident 20's progress notes revealed a Nursing Clinical admission Notes dated June 19, 2024 at 2:46 p.m. stating the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to appropriately monitor, provide appropriate interventions, and timely notify the physician of a significant weight change for two of 29 residents reviewed (Residents 85 and 127). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weights and Heights last reviewed on June 15, 2022, revealed that patients are weighed upon admission and/or re-admission, then weekly for four weeks and monthly thereafter. The purpose was to obtain baseline weight and identify significant weight changes. Review of Resident 85's dietary notes dated June 24, 2024, revealed the resident with a diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Ophthalmoplegia (movement disorder that occurs from damage to certain nerve cells in the brain). The same note revealed resident was on NPO (nothing per mouth), had a gastrostomy tube (medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition (feeding delivered through a feeding tube) as ordered by the physician for one of eight residents reviewed. (Resident 332) Findings include: Review of Resident 332's clinical record revealed the resident admitted from the hospital on March 13, 2024, with medical diagnoses that include history of Traumatic Brain Injury, Gastrostomy (artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support), Epilepsy (recurring seizures), and Encephalopathy (disease of the brain). Review of Resident 332's physician orders revealed an order dated July 19, 2024, for Osmolite 1.5 @100 ml/hr. X 16 hrs. for TV (total volume) of 1600, FWF (amount of liquid that is water) 70 ml x 16 hrs for 1120 TV TF +FWF=2340 water total. Review of Resident 332's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months of July and August 2024 revealed there were no days where it was documented the resident received a total of 1600 ml per day as ordered by the physician. Interview with the Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy and procedure review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications for two of six residents reviewed. (Residents 65 and 101) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Behaviors: Management of Symptoms last reviewed July 1, 2024 revealed, when medication sis ordered for behavior symptoms completed the Psychotropic/Therapeutic Medication use evaluation when a patient is newly prescribed psychotherapeutic medication and then quarterly. Complete the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) per nursing schedule for patient receiving antipsychotic medications. Review of Resident 65's progress notes revealed a psychiatrist entry dated July 5, 2024 with a plan for the residents current Depakote (mood stabilizer) 250 milligrams twice a day to be discontinued and a new order to increase the Depakote 250 milligrams to three times a day. Review of Resident 65's current physician orders revealed the resident was still receiving Depakote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy and procedure review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to date and label insulin pens on two medications carts and reconcile medications on discharge for one of three residents. (Resident: 131) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure Insulin Pens, last reviewed July 1, 2024, revealed Insulin Pens will be clearly labeled with the patient name, physician name, date used; a new pen must be ordered from the pharmacy. Observations of the medication cart 1 on the skilled nursing unit on August 15, 2024 at 9:15 a.m. revealed four insulin pens that were opened and being used but had no date of when they were opened or when they were to be discarded. Interview with Licensed Nursing Employee E10 at the time of the observation confirmed that these pens were opened and in use and should have been dated with the date they were first used. Observations of the medication cart 2 on the skilled nursing unit on August 15, 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain laboratory studies as ordered for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 20) Findings Include: Review of Resident 20's physician orders revealed an order dated August 1, 2024 for a CBC (comprehensive blood count- count of all the cells in the blood) and a CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel- a routine blood test that measures 14 different substances in a sample of your blood). Review of resident 20's Results for laboratory studies revealed these lab studies were not completed as ordered. Review of Resident 20's physician orders revealed an order dated July 5, 2024 for a CBC and a CMP and a tacrolimus level (measures the amount of drug in the blood to determine whether concentrations have reached therapeutic levels). Review of resident 20's Results for laboratory studies revealed these lab studies were not completed as ordered. Review of Resident 20's physician orders revealed an order dated June 24, 2024 for a CBC and a CMP and a tacrolimus level. Review of resident 20's Results for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility performed laboratory studies without a physician order for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 24) Findings Include: Review of Resident 20's laboratory results revealed the results for a Magnesium level (blood test to determine the amount of magnesium in the blood), BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel- a test that measures eight different substances in your blood) and a CBC (comprehensive blood count- count of all the cells in the blood) completed on August 12, 2024. Review of resident 20's physician orders revealed there was no order for these laboratory studies. Review of Resident 20's laboratory results revealed the results for a CBC completed on June 24, 2024. Review of resident 20's physician orders revealed there was no order for this laboratory study. Review of Resident 20's laboratory results revealed the results for CMP (a routine blood test that measures 14 different substances in a sample of your blood) and a CBC completed on June 21, 2024. Review of resident 20's physician orders revealed there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed ensure infection control management was implemented during a tracheostomy care and failed to follow policy related transmissions-based precautions and use of personal protective equipment for two of 32 sampled residents. (Resident 4 and Resident 85). Findings include: Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed an active order for indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into a bladder to drain urine) with a start date of January 15, 2024. Observations conducted of the Resident 4 on August 12, 2024, confirmed Resident 4 had an indwelling catheter. Additional observations of Resident 4 revealed an absences of Enhanced Barrier Precaution signs located in Resident 4's room or outside his room. Additional review of Resident 4's clinical record failed to reveal an order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on August 13, 2024, at 1:55 a.m. confirmed the facility failed to place Resident 4 on Enhanced Barrier Precautions related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment with dignity and respect for one of five residents observed (Resident R1) Findings include the following: Review of Resident R1's clinical record including medical diagnoses revealed diagnoses including but not limited to Dementia, Diabetes II, Peripheral Vascular Disease, muscle disorder, Peripheral Vascular Angioplasty status, Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, and Anemia. Review of Resident R1's clinical record including MDS assessments revealed resident's BIMs score was 99 which indicates severe impaired cognitive function. Observation conducted on April 16, 2024, at 10:56 am, revealed Resident observed from the hallway laying without clothes on in bed. Resident R1's door and privacy curtain were both open, revealing Resident R1's body to anyone who walked past the room. A female housekeeper was mopping the room at the time of observation. This surveyor inquired if the resident was naked, the housekeeper stated that she was. As this surveyor turned to get staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to provide hot water for all residents residing in the facility for two of two days observed, April 16, 2024, and April 17, 2024. Findings include the following: Tour of facility on April 16, 2024, at 11:45 am., revealed the shower rooms and bathrooms were not receiving sufficient hot water for comfort. Interview with Maintenance staff, Employee E confirmed the hot water temperatures were approximately 98 degrees in the shower rooms, bathrooms, and kitchen. Employee E6 indicated the hot water temperatures will be increased but the temperatures may take a few hours to circulate throughout the facility. Tour of the facility of April 17, 2024, at 1:00 pm., revealed no water in the shower rooms and low flowing water in the bathrooms. Interview conducted with maintenance staff, Employee E6, revealed a recent water pipe burst caused the need to turn the water off. Employee E6 provided documenation from the repair company indicating their estimated time of arrival was April 17, 2024, at 3:30 pm.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed ensure three medication carts were locked and secured out of six medication carts observed. Findings include: Observations conducted within the facility on [DATE], at 11:16 am., revealed three medication carts were unlocked. Observations of medication cart located behind the nurses' station and contained various creams, ointments, bandages, gauge, and powders. Observation conducted within the faccility of two other medication carts located adjacent to the nurses' station, revealed one contained bottles of medications, which was later established to be expired house medications, the other was labeled emergency cart and contained medical supplies but no medications. Observations conducted on [DATE], at 11:35 pm., accompanied by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the Director of Nursing was unaware of the unlocked medication carts. Interview and observations with the DON confirmed the house medications were expired and should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of Resident R1's physician orders revealed an order dated January 20, 2024 for Oxycodone (narcotic pain reliever) 10mg, give one tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for severe pain. Review of Resident R1's Medication Administration Record for January 2024 revealed Resident R1 received a dose on January 27, 2024 at 4:29 p.m. and the next dose administered was on January 28, 2024 at 8:30 p.m. Review of Resident R1's Progress Notes revealed a nursing entry on January 29, 2024 at 9:26 a.m. stating Resident insisted that he wanted his pain medication and charge nurse told him that he could offer him Tylenol extra strength as ordered but was waiting on pharmacy to deliver his oxycodone medication in an hour or so. Review of a list of medications the facility has in the PYXIS drug dispensing system revealed nine tablets of Oxycodone 5mg. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 29, 2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment on one of four nursing units. Findings included: Observations of the Arcadia unit on September 27, 2023, at 10:14 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that the over-the-bed table by the door was covered with a coating of what looked like dried milk and the laminate on the table had peeled off in some spots exposing the particle board underneath. The wall at the foot of the beds had a large area of wall paper (approximately twenty-four inches tall by twelve inches wide) that was torn away and hanging loose. The room had an odor of urine, and the floor was dirty with a build up of grime, food and paper debris. The entire end wall of the resident's closet, approximately twenty-four inches wide, extending upward approximately eighteen inches, had signs of water damage. The wall was warped and the base board had pulled away from the wall in several spots exposing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided with showers as scheduled for 13 of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 18, 24, 27, 32, 33, 54, 64, 71, 84, 95, 101, 103, 112). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 18, dated August 8, 2023, indicated that the resident was understood and able to understand others, required supervision with personal hygiene needs, assist of one with transfers, bathing did not occur, and it was very important for the resident to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. Bathing documentation for August 1 through September 26, 2023, indicated that Resident 18 was to receive a shower/bath during the day shift on Monday and Thursdays. There was no documented evidence that the resident received a shower during the month of August. Documentation also revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were followed for four of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 29, 88, 96). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 23, dated August 16, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance from staff for daily care needs. Physician's orders for Resident 23, dated February 16, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 25 milligrams (mg) Hydralazine (blood pressure medication) if her systolic (top number) blood pressure is greater than 180 two hours after her Lisinopril (blood pressure medication) was administered. Resident 23's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August 2023 revealed that the resident's blood pressure was 181/95 on August 12, 190/62 on August 16, and 189/73 on August 27. However, there was no indication that the staff rechecked the resident's blood pressure two hours after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that there was timely physician notification and intervention for a significant weight loss for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 27). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 27, dated July 13, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance from staff for her daily care needs. The resident's weight records revealed that she experienced a 12.08 percent (31.6 pound) (significant) weight loss in one month when his weight dropped from 261.6 pounds on May 20, 2023, to 230.0 pounds on June 28, 2023. There was no documented evidence that the physician was notified about the resident's significant weight loss. A dietary note for Resident 27, dated June 28, 2023, revealed that the resident was ordered daily weights to trend weight loss. There was no documented evidence that Resident 27's daily weights were obtained since ordered on June…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who were receiving tube feedings received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 79). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 79, dated August 27, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance for daily care needs, and had a feeding tube. Physician's orders for Resident 79, dated August 22, 2023, included an order for the resident's feeding tube to be checked for placement every day and that she receives 1150 milliliters (ml) of Jevity 1.5 (type of liquid feeding given through a tube) formula every day. A care plan for Resident 79, dated August 21, 2023, indicated that the resident had a need for a feeding tube related to a swallowing impairment and that it should be checked for placement and residuals (amount of fluid/contents in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided as ordered for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 29, dated August, 18 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had a tracheostomy (surgically-created airway in the windpipe), received tracheostomy care, and had diagnoses that included cancer of the tongue. Physician's orders, dated December 10, 2018, included an order for the staff to provide tracheostomy care every shift. A care plan, dated October 9, 2020, indicated that trach care was to be provided per the protocol. Resident 29's Treatment Administration Record (MAR) for July, August, and September 2023 revealed that tracheostomy care was not provided every shift as ordered on July 9, 13, 14, 17, 18, and 19; August 3, 6, 11, 14-17, 20, 21, 23, 25, 28, 30, 31; and September 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11-13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24-26, 2023. Observations of Resident 29 on September 27, 2023, at 10:30 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, by failing to ensure that non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions were attempted prior to the administration of as needed antianxiety medications for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 101). Findings include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 101, dated August 14, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact, had no behavior symptoms, and required assistance from staff for her daily care needs. The resident's care plan, dated August 20, 2023, revealed that staff were to keep her busy with desirable activities. There were no interventions listed to attempt prior to administering antianxiety or antidepressant/sedative medication. Physician's orders for Resident 101, dated August 9, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 0.5 milligrams (mg) of Ativan (an antianxiety medication) every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures. Findings include: The facility's food handling policy, dated May 1, 2023, revealed that cold foods are to be maintained at 40 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below. If the food temperature rises above 40 degrees F, return to refrigerator and re-chill to 40 degrees F. Hot beverages, such as coffee, tea and hot chocolate are brewed and held at temperatures of 160-185 degrees F. Interview with Resident 11 on September 27, 2023, at 11:22 a.m. revealed that the food was terrible and the coffee was never hot. Interview with Resident 27 on September 27, 2023, at 12:32 p.m. revealed that the food was not good and the meat was hard to chew. Interview with Resident 42 on September 27, 2023, at 10:15 a.m. revealed that the food was terrible. Interview with Resident 50 on September 27, 2023, at 12:30 p.m. revealed that the food is always cold, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety by failing to properly label and date stored foods and maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding food storage, dated May 1, 2023, revealed that foods in dry storage are to be in closed, labeled and dated containers; no open boxes or bags. For products that have been opened but not fully used, a use by date is included on the label. An initial tour of the kitchen on September 27, 2023, at 8:22 a.m. with Food Service Director 11 revealed that the floor was dirty with a build up of grime, the coffee machine drip tray had build up of dried coffee as well as dried splashes on the machine, a large bin of flour and sugar with a build up of grease and grime as well as drip stains on the lids and outsides of the containers, and a rack containing two large trays of bananas that were dark brown/black. Observations in the dry storage room on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 64). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 64, dated August 21, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with daily care needs, and had diagnosis that included muscle weakness and abnormal posture. Physician's orders for Resident 64, dated August 15, 2023, included an order for the resident's left elbow to be cleansed with normal saline, a small amount of thera-honey (medical grade honey used in the treatment of wounds) applied to it, and then a foam dressing applied daily. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for Resident 64, dated September 2023, revealed documentation that the resident was receiving the ordered treatment to her left elbow daily on September 2-3, 5-9, and 11-27, 2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies and staff training records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide annual abuse training for two of five employees (Licensed Practical Nurse 15, Registered Nurse 16). Findings include: The facility's abuse policy, undated, indicated that each resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. All facility staff were to be educated through orientation and a minimum of annually. A list of staff provided by the facility revealed that Licensed Practical Nurse 15 was hired on February 13, 2019. However, there was no documented evidence that Licensed Practical Nurse 15 received annual abuse training from February 13, 2022, through February 13, 2023. Registered Nurse 16 was hired on June 29, 2019. However, there was no documented evidence that Registered Nurse 16 received annual abuse training from June 29, 2022, through June 29, 2023. Interview with the Payroll Director (covering for the Human Resource Director) on September 29, 2023, at 4:13 p.m. confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and employee files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement its written abuse prevention policies, by failing to ensure that reference checks were obtained prior to hire for one of five employee files reviewed (Nurse Aide 12). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding abuse prohibition, undated, indicated that the facility would screen potential employees for a history of abuse, neglect, or mistreating residents, including attempting to obtain information from previous employers and/or current employers and checking with appropriate licensing boards and registries. The personnel file for Nurse Aide 12 revealed a hire date of July 13, 2023. There was no documented evidence that reference checks from previous or current employers were obtained prior to the employees' start date. Interview with the Payroll Director (covering for the Human Resource Director) on September 29, 2023, at 4:13 p.m. confirmed that they were not able to provide any evidence that employment reference checks were obtained prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set assessments were completed within the required time frame for nine of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 8, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 49, 50, 51). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, which provides instructions and guidelines for completing required Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments (mandated assessments of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated October 2019, indicated that the assessment reference date (ARD - the last day of the assessment's look-back period) of a quarterly MDS assessment must be no more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent assessment of any type, and the assessment was to have a completion date (Section Z0500B) that was no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. A quarterly MDS assessment for Resident 8 had an ARD of July 13, 2023. There was no previous quarterly or comprehensive MDS assessment in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed and implemented for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 106). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding baseline care plans, undated, revealed that the center must develop and implement a baseline person-centered care plan with 48 hours of admission/readmission for each patient/resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional standards of quality care. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 106, dated September 20, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted from the hospital on September 14, 2023, was understood, could understand, and required extensive assistance from staff for his daily care tasks. Physician's orders for Resident 106, dated September 14, 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs for two of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 88, 95). Findings include: The facility's current policy for Person-Centered Care Plans indicated that a comprehensive, individualized care plan for each resident will be developed within seven days of the completion of the required comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) and the care plan will be reviewed and revised after each assessment. An annual MDS assessment for Resident 88, dated, August 2, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was independent with personal care needs, and had diagnoses that included diabetes, renal (kidney) failure, and deep vein thrombosis (blood clot). Physician orders for Resident 88, dated July 28, 2023, included for the resident to receive sliding scale (insulin dose varies based on blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 84). Findings include: The facility's current policy for person-centered care plans indicated that care plans would be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments, and as needed to reflect the response to care and changing needs and goals. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 84, dated August 7, 2023, indicated that the resident was usually understood and could usually understand others, required extensive assistance for personal hygiene needs, had diagnoses that included dementia and generalized muscle weakness, and was receiving hospice care. A review of care plans for Resident 84, dated October 21, 2022, included that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that treatments for pressure ulcers were provided as ordered by the physician for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 81, dated August, 24 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance to total dependence on staff for daily care needs, and had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle). Physician's orders, dated August 7, 2023, included an order for the sacrum (area at the lower end of the spine) to be cleansed with normal saline solution (mixture of salt and water), packed with gauze soaked in Vashe (wound cleanser), and covered with a foam dressing daily and as needed. Physician's orders, dated September 18, 2023, included an order for gauze-soaked acetic acid (used to prevent wound infections) applied to the wound bed of the sacrum and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident received assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 41). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 23, dated August 16, 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired and required assistance from staff for daily care needs, including mobility on and off the unit. Observation of Resident 23 on September 28, 2023, at 12:21 p.m. revealed that the resident was sitting in a wheelchair while being transported to her room by Licensed Practical Nurse 4. There were no footrests on her wheelchair to prevent her feet from dragging during the transport. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse 4 on September 28, 2023, at 12:27 p.m. revealed that the facility does not keep foot rests on Resident 23's wheelchair and she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician performed the initial comprehensive visit with the resident and was seen by the physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 102). Findings included: A nursing note for Resident 102, dated March 18, 2023, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility. Resident 102's clinical record revealed that he was sent out to the hospital and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], and that he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 102's clinical record revealed that his initial physician visit was completed by the Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP - a registered nurse who has advanced education and clinical training in a health care specialty area) and not by the attending physician. Resident 102's clinical record revealed that he was seen by the CRNP again on March 31, 2023, and April 5 and 7,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aide performance evaluations were completed annually based on hire dates for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 6, 7, 8). Findings include: A list of nurse aides provided by the facility revealed that based on their months and days of hire, annual performance evaluations for Nurse Aides 6, 7 and 8 were due between March 27 and May 11, 2023. As of September 29, 2023, there was no documented evidence that annual performance evaluations were completed as required for Nurse Aides 6, 7 and 8. Interview with the Payroll Director (covering for the Human Resource Director) on September 29, 2023, at 4:13 p.m. confirmed that he could not provide evidence that annual performance evaluations were completed as required for Nurse Aides 6, 7 and 8. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(3)(e)(1) Management. 28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(c) Staff development.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 84). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 84, dated August 7, 2023, indicated that the resident was usually understood and could usually understand others, required extensive assistance for personal hygiene needs, had diagnosis that included dementia and generalized muscle weakness, and was receiving hospice care. Physician's orders for Resident 84, dated August 4, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 25 milligrams (mg) of Tramadol (a controlled pain medication) every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the controlled drug record (a form that accounts for each tablet/pill/dose of a controlled drug) for Resident 84 for August and September 2023 indicated that a dose of Tramadol was signed out on August 4 at 10:30 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary drugs that were used for a longer duration than what was ordered by the physician for one of 56 residents reviewed (Resident 81). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 81, dated August, 24 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, had a pressure ulcer, and received an antibiotic medication. A nursing note for Resident 81, dated August 17, 2023, at 3:11 p.m. revealed that the resident had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer to her sacrum (area located at the end of the spine) that had a copious (large) amount of sero-purulent (watery drainage containing pus) drainage and a strong, foul odor. The Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP-registered nurse with specialized training) was notified and an order was received for Keflex (antibiotic). Physician's orders, dated August 17, 2023, included an order for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the physician, resulting in significant medication errors for two of 56 residents reviewed (Residents 29, 88). Findings include: A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 29, dated August, 18 2023, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received an anti-psychotic medication, and had diagnoses that included schizophrenia (disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). Physician's orders for Resident 29, dated May 24, 2023, included an order for the resident to receive 1 milliliter (mL) of 100 milligrams/mL of haldol decanoate (used to treat schizophrenia) one time a day every 21 days. The resident's care plan, dated May 17, 2021, indicated that the resident had diagnoses that included schizophrenia and his medications were to be administered as ordered by the physician. Resident 29's Medication Administration Records (MAR's)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Facility Assessment was completed, and reviewed and revised, as needed, at least annually. Findings include: Review of facility documents revealed that there was no documented evidence that a Facility Assessment was completed or reviewed and revised, as needed, at least annually. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on September 29, 2023, at 3:25 p.m. confirmed that there was no evidence of a completed Facility Assessment. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e) Management.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for three of 56 residents reviewed who were receiving hospice services (Residents 40, 84, 95). Findings include: An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 40, dated August 3, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene needs, had a diagnosis of dementia, and was receiving hospice care (end-of-life services). Physician's orders for Resident 40, dated September 2, 2022, included an order for the resident to be evaluated and treated by hospice. Care plan for Resident 40, dated September 6, 2022, indicated that the resident was receiving hospice services with Heartland Hospice. A quarterly annual MDS assessment for Resident 84, dated August 7, 2023, indicated that the resident was usually understood and could usually…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies. Findings include: The facility's deficiencies and plans of corrections for a State Survey and Certification (Department of Health) survey ending November 9, 2022, and a complaint investigation survey ending April 5, 2023, revealed that the facility developed plans of correction that included quality assurance systems to ensure that the facility maintained compliance with cited nursing home regulations. The results of the current survey, ending September 29, 2023, identified repeated deficiencies related to Medicaid/Medicare liability notices, care plan timing and revision, the failure to provide quality of care, treatment and services to prevent pressure ulcers, free from accident hazards, nutrition and hydration, and records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee met quarterly for two of three quarters reviewed (first and second quarter 2023). Findings include: Review of Quality Assurance Committee sign-in sheets revealed no evidence that the facility held quarterly meetings in 2023 prior to September 27, 2023. Interview with the Director of Nursing on September 28, 2023, at 4:00 p.m. confirmed that there was no documented evidence of quarterly quality assurance meetings being held in the first and second quarter of 2023. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the water management policy was implemented for the detection and/or prevention of Legionella within the facility's water systems. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding Legionnaires' Disease (a severe form of pneumonia), undated, revealed that appropriate infection control, environmental decontamination, and prevention measures will be followed for the prevention and management of legionella (Legionnaires' Disease). However, there was no documented evidence that the facility conducted a facility risk assessment to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility's water system; implemented a water management program that considered the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE - an American professional association seeking to advance heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration systems design and construction)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel files and staff interviews, it was determined that based on nurse aides' hire dates, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides completed at least 12 hours of inservice education annually for three of three nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aides 6, 7, 8). Findings include: Nurse aide education records revealed that based on their hire dates, Nurse Aides 6, 7, and 8 did not have at least 12 hours of education annually as follows: Nurse Aide 6's hire date was April 19, 2022, and inservice records revealed that she had 0.0 hours of education between April of 2022 and April of 2023. Nurse Aide 7's hire date was May 11, 2022, and inservice records revealed that she had 0.0 hours of education between May of 2022 and May of 2023. Nurse Aide 8's hire date was March 27, 2006, and inservice records revealed that she had 0.00 hours of education between March of 2022 and March of 2023. Interview with the Payroll Director (covering for the Human Resource Director) on September 29, 2023, at 4:13 p.m. confirmed that the above-listed nurse aides did not have evidence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents received prescribed insulin timely for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of resident R1's clinical record revealed the following diagnosis: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications (condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar). Interview with Resident R1 on September 1, 2023 at approximately 10:45 a.m. revealed resident retires for the evening around 8:00 p.m. Resident R1 stated that he/she receives the insulin medication later in the evening but is to be given the medication at bedtime. Review of R1's clinical record revealed a physician's order as follows; Levemir Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Detemir) Inject 18 unit subcutaneously at bedtime for DM. Review of R1's eMAR (electronic medication administration record) revealed R1 insulin medication was scheduled for administration at 8 p.m. Additional review of the eMAR revealed R1 received his/her insulin medication was administered on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-09-29 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the required notice to the resident or the resident's representative following the end of their Medicare coverage, or failed to provide 48-hour advanced notice, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 122). Findings include: Resident 122's medical record revealed that he began Medicare A services on June 15, 2023, and her last covered day was July 7, 2023. The medical record indicated that the facility initiated discontinuation from Medicare Part A coverage and that the resident's benefit days were not exhausted. The facility had no documented evidence that the resident was issued a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form or an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) as required. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on September 28, 2023, at 4:08 p.m. revealed that Resident 122 was not issued a SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form or an ABN and that she should have been. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(1) Management.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$3,145 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $3,145 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS PM PA OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/15/2022 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2023 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/15/2022 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| BAMBA, MIATA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/21/2025 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| YARMARK, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/21/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 37% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395834. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.