Abbeyville Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Cent
100 Abbeyville Road, Lancaster, PA 17603 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 172 certified beds · (717) 397-4261 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.1% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.2% | 10.8% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.8% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.1% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.8% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.9% | 17.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.7% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.2% | 9.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.68 | 1.62 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.41 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 231 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.9%CMS range 46.1–57.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.6–12.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 5.5–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 155.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the office of the state long term care ombudsman of emergency transfers for 10 of 31 residents reviewed (Residents 1, 10, 14, 20, 46, 84, 91, 126, 134, and 165).Findings include:Finding include Review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital on March 11, 2026, due to abnormal vitals. Further review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's clinical record and facility documentation failed to reveal evidence that the State Ombudsman's office was notified of Resident 1's transfer and admission to the hospital. Review of Resident 10's progress note of December 27, 2025, revealed that resident's power of attorney requested that resident be sent to the hospital for respiratory distress. Further review of the clinical record revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a baseline care plan meeting for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 4).Findings include:Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of vascular dementia (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain, resulting in loss of reality contact and functioning ability).Interview with Resident 4's representative on March 30, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. revealed that Resident 4 and Resident 4's representative had not had a care plan meeting to establish a baseline care plan since admission.Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed a social services progress note dated March 11, 2026, which revealed an attempt had been made to schedule a meeting with Resident 4 but Resident 4 was sleeping. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 3, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. confirmed that no further contact had been made with Resident 4 or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a resident interview and review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident or resident's representative was included in the resident's comprehensive care plan for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 3).Findings include:Interview with Resident 3 on March 30, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. revealed that the resident had not been invited to a care plan conference. Review of Resident 3's clinical record revealed that a quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident needs) had been completed on February 17, 2026. Further review of the clinical record revealed no evidence that a care plan meeting was held or that the resident was invited to the meeting. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 2, 2025, at 10:37 a.m. confirmed that there was no evidence that a care plan meeting was held or that the resident was invited. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(3)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physicians' orders in regard to weights and medication administration for two of 31 residents review (Resident 95 and Resident 133).Findings include:Review of Resident 95 face sheet revealed medical diagnoses that includes but not limited to; HEART FAILURE (a chronic condition where the heart is unable to pump enough blood), HYPOMAGNESEMIA (a low concentration of magnesium in the blood), UNSPECIFIED SEVERE PROTEIN-CALORIE MALNUTRITION (insufficient intake of both protein and calories), and ADULT FAILURE TO THRIVE (significant decline in physical mental and functional health).Review of Resident 95's physician order revealed an order for weekly weights dated February 23, 2026 noting Weekly weight. Please obtain a weekly weight EVERY Wednesday. Weigh every day shift every Wednesday for Weekly weight. Start date: February 25, 2026Review of Resident 95's weight summary revealed on February 25, 2026, March 11, 2026, March 18, 2026, and March 25, 2026, Resident 95's weight was not obtained.Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MMR) were completed as required for two of seven residents reviewed (Resident 6 and Resident 12).Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review (DRR) indicated that the MMR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolved medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. The MMR also involves collaborating with other members of the interdisciplinary team (IDT), including the resident, their family, and/or resident representative. Review of Resident 6's Medication Regimen Reviews between March 29, 2025 and March 8, 2026, revealed pharmacist recommendations documented in the progress notes tab of the resident's clinical chart under Medication Regimen Review on the following dates: March 29, 2025, May 29, 2025, June 28, 2025, July 26, 2025, September 29, 2025, October 25, 2025, November 17, 2025, and December 17, 2025. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record was determined that the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan related to discharge for five of five residents (Residents R1, R6, R7, R8, and R15).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Discharge Planning Process dated 10/20/24, indicated the facility must develop and implement an effective discharge planning process. Discharge planning will begin upon admission and be completed as part of the Person-Centered Care Plan process. Review of the facility policy, Person Centered Care Plan dated 10/20/24, indicated, Care plan includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a patient's medical, nursing, nutrition, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessments for newly admitted patients. The interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the patient and or patient representatives as appropriate, will establish the expected goals and outcomes of care, the type, amount, frequency and duration of care, and any other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide prescribed treatment and services related to the wounds for four of six residents (Resident R2, R3, R4, and R5).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Skin Integrity and Wound Management dated 10/20/24, indicated the facility will provide safe and effective care to promote optimal skin health. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated 7/24/25, included diagnoses of high blood pressure, presence of a hip fracture, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a progress note dated 7/17/25, at 3:35 p.m. indicated, Res (resident) admitted to room - res arrived to the facility on a litter- res transferred from litter to bed with 4 assist- res has 2 drains (a tube placed near a surgical incision or wound to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a fully functioning resident call bell system that allows residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area in four of five nursing units (Arcadia, [NAME], Roosevelt, and [NAME] nursing units).Findings include: Review of the facility policy Call Lights dated 10/20/24, indicated, Patients will have a call light or alternative communication device at each patient's bedside, toilet, and bathing room to allow patients to call for assistance when unattended. Staff will respond to call lights and communication devices promptly. During an observation on 8/4/25, at 9:49 a.m. the call light was activated for room [ROOM NUMBER]. The light above the door illuminated, but the panel at the nurses' station ([NAME]) did not activate. During an interview on 8/4/25, at 9:49 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide in a timely manner, notice of Medicare non coverage (payment) for two of seven residents (Resident R1 and R14). Findings include: Review of CMS guidelines, Medicare provider or health plan must deliver a completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to beneficiaries/enrollees receiving covered skilled nursing, home health (including psychiatric home health), comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, and hospice services. The NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end or the second to last day of service if care is not being provided daily. The Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage, (SNF ABN) must be issued to Medicare Fee -for-Service (original Medicare) beneficiaries who are receiving care in a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) when: Medicare is expected to deny coverage and when the SNF wants to charge the beneficiary for the non-covered services. Review of the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide in a timely manner, notice of Medicare non coverage (payment) for two of seven residents (Resident R1 and R14).Findings include: Review of CMS guidelines, Medicare provider or health plan must deliver a completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to beneficiaries/enrollees receiving covered skilled nursing, home health (including psychiatric home health), comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, and hospice services. The NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end or the second to last day of service if care is not being provided daily. The Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage, (SNF ABN) must be issued to Medicare Fee -for-Service (original Medicare) beneficiaries who are receiving care in a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) when: Medicare is expected to deny coverage and when the SNF wants to charge the beneficiary for the non-covered services. Review of the clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of the facility documents and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to permit a resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility for one of six residents (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Discharge Planning Process dated 10/20/24, indicated the facility must develop and implement an effective discharge planning process. Included in the process description was, Include regular evaluation of patients to identify changes that require modifications of the discharge plan' the discharge plan must be updated to reflect these changes. Review of the American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics document, Physician Responsibilities for Safe Patient Discharge from Healthcare Facilities indicated, To facilitate a patient's safe discharge from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon review of facility policy and procedure, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a weight gain for two of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 76 and Resident 147). Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Weights and Heights, revised 2023, revealed the facility is to notify the physician and dietitian of significant weight changes; document notification of physician and dietitian in the Weight Change Progress Note and the licensed nurse will notify the physician of the dietitian recommendations. Review of Resident 76's physician orders revealed an order stating weigh - daily. Notify MD with weight gain of 1 pound in 1 day or 3 pounds in one week. Review of Resident 76's Weight Summary revealed on January 21, 2025 Resident 76 weighed 226.5 pounds. Further review of Resident 76's Weight Summary revealed on January 22, 2025 Resident 76 weighed 230 pounds indicating a 3.5 pound weight gain in one day. Review of Resident 76's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of an incident involving suspected abuse for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 78). Findings include: Review of facilities Abuse Prohibition policy, revision date October 24, 2022, states employees are designated as mandated reports and are obligated to immediately report any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a patient. Review of minimum data set (MDS, standardized assessment tool to evaluate residents) dated October 1, 2024, revealed Resident 78 possessed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15 (cognition intact). Clinical record review for Resident 78 revealed nursing documentation dated October 6, 2024, at 8:21 PM that indicated that staff were notified by Resident 78 that she/he was hit multiple times by a staff member during the evening shift (3pm-11pm) on October 6, 2024. Further review of nursing documentation revealed the following [Resident 78] made false accusations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was not appropriately completed for two of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 60 and Resident 92). Findings include: The PASRR (Preadmission Screening Resident Review) was created in 1987 through language in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) and it has three goals: to identify individuals with mental illness and/or intellectual disability, to ensure they are placed appropriately, whether in the community or in a nursing facility, and to ensure they receive the services they require for their mental illness or intellectual disability. The PASRR Level 1 must be completed on all persons who are considering admission to a Medicaid certified nursing facility. Review of Resident 60's clinical record revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on August, 2025. Subsequent review of Resident 60's clinical record failed to produce a copy of a completed PASRR. A request for a copy of a completed PASRR was request from the Nursing Home Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based upon clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was in place for a Foley catheter (rubber tube placed into bladder to drain urine out of the body) upon admission for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 84). Findings include: Review of Resident 84's clinical record revealed Resident 84 was admitted to the facility with a Foley catheter on January 14, 2025. Review of Resident 84's care plan failed to reveal evidence of a care plan for Resident 84's Foley catheter. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on February 6, 2025 at 11:07 a.m. confirmed that there was no baseline care plan completed from admission regarding Resident 84's Foley catheter. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing Services 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical Records
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure interventions were provided timely for a resident at risk for developing a pressure ulcer and that wound monitoring was done timely for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident CL1). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management, revised on October 15, 2024, revealed, that the plan of care for the patient will reflect assessment findings from the comprehensive patient assessment and wound evaluation. Staff will continually observe and monitor patients for changes and implement revisions to the plan as needed. The same policy revealed the identification of the patient's skin integrity status and the need for prevention or treatment intervention through a review of all appropriate assessments and information. Implement pressure injury prevention for identified modifiable risk factors. A review of Resident CL1's admission assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's policy, Pennsylvania Department of Health (DOH) 2023-PAHAN-694 review, clinical records review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that infection control prevention and management were implemented on two of four units observed ([NAME] and [NAME]) as well as within reception and Rehab department. Findings include: Review of the Pennsylvania Department of Health 2023-PA HAN-694-5-11- UPD (updated) titled Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendation for COVID-19 in Healthcare Settings, updated on May 11, 2023, revealed Department of Health (DOH) recommends using the following additional infection control prevention and control practices related to COVID-19 (An infectious respiratory illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus), along with standard practice recommended as a part of routine healthcare delivery to patients. The same PA HAN revealed source control options for HCP (healthcare personnel): A NIOSH-approved particulate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, pharmacy delivery report, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the physician's medication order was followed for one of the three residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of Resident CL1's physician order dated November 23, 2024, revealed an order for Rytary Oral Capsule Extended Release 23.75-95 MG (Carbidopa-Levodopa) Give 3 capsules by mouth three times a day for Parkinson's (A disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often include tremors). Review of the November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that from November 24, 2024, until November 30, 2024, Resident CL1 was not administered with medication Rytary nine times. Nursing progress notes review dated November 24, 2024, at 9:23 a.m., 11:56 a.m., and 7:00 p.m., November 28, 2024, at 9:17 p.m., November 29, 2024, at 10:22 p.m., November 30, 2024, at 1:12 p.m., all indicated that medication was not administered pending/awaiting delivery from the pharmacy. Review of the pharmacy medication delivery report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to establish a baseline care plan upon admission for a surgical wound for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Resident 1's clinical record review revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for short term rehabilitation from surgery. Review of Resident 1's care plan failed to reveal evidence that a baseline care plan was established upon admission for the presence and care of a surgical wound. Interview with Licensed Employee E1 on August 13, 2024, at 10:24 a.m. confirmed Resident 1 did not have a baseline care plan established upon admission for the presence and care of a surgical wound. Interview with the Interim Director of Nursing on August 13, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. confirmed Resident 1 did not have a baseline care plan established upon admission for the presence and care of a surgical wound. 28 Pa. Code 211.11(c)(d) Resident Care Plan
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide bathing/showering services for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Resident 1's clinical record review revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for short term rehabilitation from surgery. Review of Resident 1's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that Resident 1 received a shower from admission through August 13, 2024. Interview with Licensed Employee E1 on August 13, 2024, at 10:24 a.m. confirmed Resident 1 had not had a shower since admission on [DATE]. This interview further confirmed that there was no clinical reason for Resident 1 not to have received a shower. Interview with the Interim Director of Nursing on August 13, 2024 at 12:30 p.m. confirmed Resident 1 had not received a shower since admission. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(1)(5) Nursing Services Previously cited 8/16/2023, 3/8/2024, 4/30/2024, 6/11/2024
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to assess a surgical wound for signs and symptoms of infection for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Resident 1's clinical record review revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], for short term rehabilitation from surgery. Further review of Resident 1's clinical record revealed Resident 1 had a surgical wound located mid-back. Review of Resident 1's physician orders upon admission revealed an order indicating, Surgical incision on back - cleanse incision with NSS [normal saline], dry well and leave OTA [open to air] every day shift for incision care. Review of Resident 1's June 2024 Treatment Administration Record revealed the above-mentioned treatment did not occur on June 22, 2024, and June 23, 2024. Review of Resident 1's progress notes dated July 1, 2024, revealed Pt [patient] seen for c/o [complaints of] infection to surgical back incision. [resident] has reported an increase…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based review of the facility's policy, clinical records facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly and timely investigate an allegation of being mishandled with roughness by a resident who verbalized feeling of not being safe in the facility for one of two residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition, review date October 24, 2022, revealed that immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment, or neglect, initiate an investigation within 24 hours of an alleged of abuse that focuses on whether abuse or neglect occurred and to what extent; clinical examination for signs of injuries if indicated; causative factor; and interventions to prevent further injury. The investigation will be thoroughly documented within the Risk Management Portal. Ensure that documentation of witnessed interviews is located. Review of Resident CL1's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for one of the two units observed ([NAME]) Findings include: Observation in Resident R1's room conducted on June 11, 2024, at 10:45 a.m., revealed a multiple black pellet-looking object approximately 20 plus on the bottom wall vent and approximately 50 on the floor below the resident ' s television. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] bathroom conducted on June 12, 2024, at 10:50 a.m., revealed three tiles were broken exposing a hole in the bottom wall of the bathroom. Interview with licensed nurse, Employee E3 was conducted with the above observations on June 11, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. Employee E3 confirmed that the multiple black pellets-looking objects in resident 1's room were mouse droppings. Observation conducted on June 11, 2024, at 1:30 p.m., revealed the mouse droppings observed earlier were still present in the resident's room. Interview conducted with the maintenance director on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's admission progress note of April 3, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted with a surgical wound to the right lower leg with a wound VAC (vacuum assisted closure - therapeutic technique using a suction pump, tubing, and a dressing to remove excess exudate [fluid] and promote healing in acute or chronic wounds) in place. Review of a physician's order dated April 3, 2024, indicated wound vac - do not change dressing - monitor dressing and machine - res [resident] sees trauma and acute care for wound vac changes - notify trauma and acute changes if any issues every shift for wound care. Review of Resident R1's progress note of April 24, 2024, revealed that resident tested positive for Flu A and Flu A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective pest control system on the facility's dementia unit (Arcadia). Findings include: Interview with Employee E4 on April 10, 2024, at 12:00 p.m. revealed mice were a big issue on the dementia unit, and that seeing mice running around day and night was a common occurrence. Tour of the Arcadia unit on April 10, 2024, at 12:00 p.m. revealed mouse droppings on the nightstand next to Resident 1's bed. Interview with Resident 2 on April 10, 2024, at approximately 12:15 p.m. revealed that the resident frequently sees mice running around the unit and the room, and the last time the resident saw a mouse was the prior night running around the resident's room. Review of pest control logs revealed the facility's pest control company last came to the facility on March 29, 2024. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on April 10, 2024, at approximately 2:30 p.m. confirmed the facility was aware of an ongoing mice problem. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(a)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that written notices of emergency transfers to the hospital were provided to the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman for 6 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident 78, 111, 112, 119, 126 and 146). Findings include: Review of Resident 78's clinical record revealed Resident 78 was hospitalized on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. No documentation was provided indicating the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified. Review of Resident 111's clinical record revealed Resident 111 was hospitalized on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. No documentation was provided indicating the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified. Review of Resident 112's progress note of October 28, 2023, revealed that the resident wanted to go to the hospital. The on-call physician was notified and ordered that the resident be sent to the hospital. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices related to proper ice handling on 3 of 4 units ([NAME], [NAME], and Roosevelt). Findings include: Observation on March 5, 2024, at 11:25 a.m. on [NAME] unit revealed that the ice scoop was in a covered plastic container. The container had a washcloth placed in the bottom with the ice scoop resting directly on the washcloth which was wet. Observations on March 8, 2024 between 10:05 a.m. and 10:07 a.m on the [NAME] unit and Roosevelt unit, respectively, revealed that the ice scoops were in covered plastic containers. The containers had a washcloth in the bottom with the ice scoop resting directly on the washcloth in approximately one inch of water. Interview with the DON and Employee E4, Infection Preventionist, on March 8, 2024, at 1:30 p.m., confirmed that the washcloth should not be in the container with the ice scoop. 28 Pa Code 201.18(b)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 32 residents reviewed (Resident 79). Findings include: Review of Resident 79's clinical record revealed a quarterly Minimmal Data Set (MDS- a tool used to identify plan of care) dated December 1, 2023, identified a new pressure ulcer. Further review of Resident 79's clinical record revealed no further documentation of the pressure ulcer. An interview with the licensed employee E3, on March 8, 2024, at 9:49 a.m., revealed that the resident did not have a pressure ulcer during the review for the MDS, and it was incorrectly coded. 28 Pa. Code 211.5(f) Clinical records 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c) Nursing services 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents with an order for fluids restrictions were monitored for their fluid intake for three of the 32 residents reviewed (Residents 76, 108, and 124). Findings include: Review of Resident 76's physician orders revealed an order for Fluid restriction 1800 ml daily [milliliters] Further review of Resident 76's clinical records failed to reveal documented evidence that Resident 76's fluid restrictions were monitored according to physician's orders. Clinical records review revealed Resident 108 was readmitted from the hospital on January 16, 2024, with a diagnosis of Hyponatremia (low sodium level). Review of the physician order dated January 18, 2024, revealed an order for Fluid restriction 1800/24 hrs. Review of Resident 108's clinical records failed to reveal Resident 108's fluid intake was monitored from January 18, 2024, until February 1, 2024. Review of Resident 124's physician orders revealed an order for Fluid restriction 2000 ml [milliliters] daily.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical records review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory service and treatment for one of the 32 residents reviewed (Resident 42). Findings include: Review of Resident 42's diagnosis list includes Obstructive sleep apnea (Which means breathing stops for short periods during sleep due to a blocked/partially blocked airway). Observation conducted on March 6, 2024, revealed a CPAP (Continuous positive airway pressure - A machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) machine on Resident 42's bedside table. Review of Resident 42's physician's order sheet dated November 21, 2022, revealed an order for CPAP @ pressure 15cm H2O every night shift for Sleep Apnea. Review of Resident 42's clinical records revealed Resident 42 was hospitalized on [DATE], due to Acute Encephalopathy (An acute/subacute functional alteration of mental status due to systemic factors) and returned to the facility on January 4, 2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, pharmacy record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were available for residents for two of the 32 residents reviewed (Resident 42, and 85). Findings include: Review of Resident 42's physician order dated September 3, 2023, revealed an order for Linezolid Oral Tablet (antibiotic) 600mg one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). Review of Resident 42's September 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Linezolid ordered on September 3, 2023, was not administered to the resident until the evening of September 5, 2023. Review of the pharmacy delivery report revealed Resident 42's Linezolid medication ordered on September 3, 2023, was not delivered to the facility until September 5, 2023. Review of Resident 85's nursing progress notes dated January 19, 2024, revealed resident was observed with redness and swelling to the left eye, the NP (nurse practitioner) was notified and ordered Erythromycin ointment (eye antibiotic) to the left eye and Prednisone tablet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, a review of medication manufacturer's guidelines, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled for two of the three units observed ([NAME] and [NAME]). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, dated January 2022, revealed that once a medication or biological package is opened, the facility should follow manufacturer/supplier guidelines concerning the expiration date for opened medication. Facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container when the medication has a shortened expiration date once opened. The same policy also revealed that the facility should ensure that the medications are stored in the containers in which they were originally received. Review of the manufacturer's storage guidelines for Insulin Lispro (Humalog-fast-acting insulin), revealed that the medication must be stored at room temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for residents unable to carry out activities of daily living for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings include: Interview with Resident 1 on August 14, 2023, at 1:20 p.m. revealed that resident does not receive a bed bath as scheduled. Review of Resident 6's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - periodic assessment of resident needs) dated June 21, 2023, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and resident is totally dependent on one person for assistance with bathing. Review of facility documentation revealed that resident is to receive a shower/bath on Wednesdays and Saturdays. Review of documentation from July 14, 2023, to July 14, 2023, revealed that the resident did not receive a shower/bath. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on August 15, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. indicated that the resident had received bed baths, but sometimes refuses.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a written notice regarding emergency transfer to the hospital was provided to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for four of five residents reviewed (Residents 12, 29, 78, 130). Findings include: Review of Resident 29's progress note of October 20, 2024, revealed resident tested positive for pneumonia and an order was received to send the resident to the hospital. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 78, dated October 1, 2024, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, was usually understood, and could usually understand others. A nursing note for Resident 78, dated October 31, 2024, at 1:27 p.m., indicated that Resident 78 was transferred to [NAME] General Hospital for abnormal other lab value or study. Further review revealed Resident 78 was admitted to the hospital due to critical potassium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS PM PA OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/15/2022 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2020 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/15/2022 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| CANLAD, STEPHANIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/10/2022 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395199. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.