Crestview Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 149 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 164.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, facility documentation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one of four residents reviewed was free from sexual abuse, resulting in psychosocial harm including being diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (Resident R1). This deficiency was identified as past noncompliance. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition revised 2025, revealed abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, injury, or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods and services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental or psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all patients, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-03-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to timely identify and implement interventions to ensure that Resident R1 did not develop pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who developed an unstageable sacral pressure ulcer requiring hospitalization for one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Skin Integrity and Wound Management, revised 2025, revealed staff are to perform comprehensive initial and ongoing assessments of factors affecting skin integrity, develop care plans reflective of assessment findings, and implement as well as revise interventions as needed to prevent skin breakdown. The policy further revealed staff are responsible for identifying residents at risk and implementing appropriate prevention and treatment interventions. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident R1 was free from neglect related to failing to provide wound treatment in accordance with physician orders. This failure resulted in actual harm for Resident R1 who developed an infection of the left foot surgical site, for one of nine residents reviewed. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition, revised November 14, 2025, indicates Neglect is defined as the failure, indifference, or disregard of the center, its employees, or service providers to provide care, comfort, safety, goods and services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. This includes the failure to implement an effective communication system across all shifts for communicating necessary care and information between center, patient, practitioner and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Resident R1 was providing wound treatment in accordance with physician orders. This failure resulted in actual harm for Resident R1 who developed a wound infection of the left foot surgical site for one of nine residents reviewed. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance. (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Skin integrity and wound management revised September 15, 2025, indicates the A comprehensive initial and ongoing nursing assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence skin health, skin/ wound impairment, and the ability of a wound to heal will be performed. The plan of care for the patient will be reflective of assessment findings from the comprehensive patient assessment and wound evaluation. Staff will continually observe and monitor patients for changes and implement revisions to the plan of care as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records an interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who have a change in clinical status were evaluated by a provider. For one of ten residents observed (Resident R1)Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of but not limited to Centrilobular Emphysema (chronic lung disease). Review of progress note dated November 30, 2025, at 10:00 p.m. written by licensed nurse Employee E3 revealed a change in condition. At the time of evaluation resident/patient vital signs, weight and blood sugar were: Blood Pressure 92/43 (normal blood pressure 110/80) , Pulse: 90 (normal pulse 60 per 100 beats per minute) - RR (respiration rate):18.0 (normal 30 to 60 breath per minute)-Temperature: T 99.5 (normal body temperature 97.-95.5 degrees Fahrenheit), Weight: 91.2 pounds, Pulse Oximetry: O2 89.0 % ([NAME] oxygen level 95%-100%) - Method: Room Air. Outcomes of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records an interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order was in place before administering oxygen for one of ten residents observed (Resident R1).Findings include: Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of but not limited to Centrilobular Emphysema (chronic lung disease). Review of progress note dated November 30, 2025, at 10:00 p.m. written by licensed nurse Employee E3 revealed a change in condition. At the time of evaluation resident/patient vital signs, weight and blood sugar were: Blood Pressure 92/43 (normal blood pressure 110/80) , Pulse: 90 (normal pulse 60 per 100 beats per minute) - RR (respiration rate):18.0 (normal 30 to 60 breath per minute)-Temperature: T 99.5 (normal body temperature 97.-95.5 degrees Fahrenheit), Weight: 91.2 pounds, Pulse Oximetry: O2 89.0 % ([NAME] oxygen level 95%-100%) - Method: Room Air. Outcomes of Physical Assessment:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely assessment, identification, and documentation of a change in condition related to skin integrity for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R1).Review of facility policy Skin Integrity and Wound Management, revised 2025, revealed the nursing assistant will observe skin daily and report any changes or concerns to the nurse. The licensed nurse will:- Evaluate any reported or suspected skin changes or wounds;- Document newly identified skin/wound impairments as a change in condition; -Document skin/wound findings on the 24-hour Report;-Perform and document skin inspection on all newly admitted /readmitted patients weekly thereafter and with any significant change of condition.Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of brain neoplasm (brain tumor), epilepsy (brain condition that causes recurring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident assessments accurately reflected resident diagnoses for one of nine residents reviewed. (Resident R148) Finding includes:Review of facility policy titled Social Service Assessment revised March 15, 2024, revealed residents will have a social service assessment completed upon admission, quarterly, annually and with a significant change in condition.Review of Resident R148's clinical record revealed that on October 21, 2024, resident was given the diagnosis of anorexia. Review of Resident R148's care plan last revised on May 28, 2025, revealed that this resident has potential for nutrition hydration risk due to advanced age currently stable nutritionally.Interview with DON Employee E2 on July 3, 2025, at 09:40 a.m. revealed that the diagnosis of anorexia for Resident R148 was not accurate. It is believed that the diagnosis of Anorexia was used for that practitioners visit for the purpose of a billing code and transcribed into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a person center care plan related to elopement for one out of 33 residents reviewed. (Resident R77) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Center Operations Policies and Procedures dated October 24, 2022, revealed A comprehensive, individualized care plan will be developed within seven days after completion of the comprehensive assessment (admission, annual or significant change in status) and review and revise the care plan after each assessment. Review of review of Resident R 77's was admitted into the facility February 2, 2023, with diagnosis' including autistic disorder (significant language delays, social and communication challenges, unusual behaviors and interests) anxiety disorder, personal history of traumatic brain injury, dementia severity with agitation, depression and psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federal mandated assessment tool for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical record, observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for two of 33 residents reviewed. (Resident R90 and Resident 136). Findings:Review of facility policy titled Safe Resident Handling/Transfer Equipment, revised 2024, revealed Safe Resident Handling involves the use of assistive devices to ensure that patients can be transferred safely and that care providers avoid performing high risk patient handling tasks. The purpose is to optimize staff safety and the safety, comfort, and function of patients during transfers, ambulation, and/or repositioning. Clinical record review revealed Resident R90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (condition that prevents airflow to the lungs, causing breathing problems), chronic kidney disease (condition where kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood properly), and polyneuropathy (type of nerve…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of clinical record, facility policy, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to exercise proper infection control techniques for one of three nursing units observed (East wing).Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 2025, revealed personal protective equipment (PPE) should be readily accessible and located outside of the patient's room. Before exiting room, remove and place PPE (e.g., gowns and gloves) in the trash and perform hand hygiene upon exiting room. Observation on June 30, 2025 at 10:10 a.m. on east wing (rooms 300-330) revealed 17 resident rooms (rooms 301, 302, 304, 306, 307, 308, 309, 311, 312, 314, 316, 318, 319, 321, 322, 323, 328) with enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) signage on door and no appropriate disposal container available in the resident room to allow for removal of PPE inside the room. Further observation on June 30, 2025 at 10:20 p.m. revealed 10 of 17 resident rooms on EBP (rooms 304, 306, 309, 311, 312, 314, 316, 319, 323, 328) did not have an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a tour of resident care areas, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received the necessary services to maintain persona hygiene for two of four residents reviewed (Resident R1 and Resident R2). Findings Include: Review of documentation submitted by the facility on January 20, 2025, to the State Survey Agency via the Event Reporting System (electronic database that collects reports of resident events from healthcare facilities), revealed on January 18, 2025, it was reported that there was no hot water available on the nursing units. Maintenance was contacted and was able to successfully restore one of two hot water heaters. The facility reported being unable to maintain comfortable water temperatures during times of peak water demand due to only one hot water heater supplying hot water to the entire center. Continued review of facility documentation submitted to the Event…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to assess, monitor and notify the physician regarding an injury of unknown origin for one of two residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of facility policy on Assessment revealed that under section POLICY: The Center will conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, standardized, reproducible assessment of each patient's functional capacity. The assessment must accurately reflect the patient's status at the time of assessment. Routine and focused assessments will be performed on an ongoing basis as needed. The assessment process must include direct observation and communication with the patient, as well as communication with licensed and non-licensed direct care staff members on all shifts. Under section PURPOSE: To determine patient's condition and clinical needs. Under section PRACTICE STANDARDS 4. Conduct a change in condition assessment as needed using…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of resident council minutes, resident and group interviews and interviews with staff, and facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered a private group meeting during resident council for 6 of 6 residents interviewed (Resident R9, R47, R82, R120, R133, and R145) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Recreation Services Policies and Procedures revised on 8/7/23 states the facility will promote and support self-governing and decision-making Resident Councils to provide an opportunity to meet regularly and without interference. The same policy states to provide appropriate accommodations and a meeting place that is private. During Resident Group with 6 alert and oriented residents on September 4, 2024, at approximately 11:00 a.m. Resident R82 indicated during resident council some of the members did not like to use their name if there was a concern or problem so the facility doesn't get told. Members of the resident council were asked, during the time they meet in private would it be more comfortable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA