Laureldale Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Cent

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 156 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 198 beds and averages 170.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.550 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to keep one of three sampled residents free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm of a head injury. (Resident 1) Findings include. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included muscle wasting, hypertension (high blood pressure), history of transient ischemic attacks (temporary interruptions of blood supply to the brain), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (a condition of increased plaque in the arteries of the heart, potentially causing heart attacks), and chronic respiratory failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a periodic evaluation of resident care needs) dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had a history of falls and required maximum assistance to use the toilet. The care plan identified that Resident 1 was at risk for falls and required assistance with activities of daily living (basic self-care tasks such as personal hygiene…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions to prevent accidents related to falls for one of three sampled residents which resulted in actual harm of a head injury. (Resident 1) Findings include. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included muscle wasting, hypertension (high blood pressure), history of transient ischemic attacks (temporary interruptions of blood supply to the brain), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (a condition of increased plaque in the arteries of the heart, potentially causing heart attacks), and chronic respiratory failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a periodic evaluation of resident care needs) dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had a history of falls and required maximum assistance to use the toilet. The care plan identified that Resident 1 was at risk for falls and required assistance with activities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner in the kitchen.Findings include: Observations during the kitchen tour on June 7, 2026, at 9:30 a.m., revealed the following: In the walk-in refrigerator, there was a container of prepared meatballs labeled with a use by date of June 4, 2026. There were four, two-pound packages of smoked deli turkey breast labeled use or freeze by May 30, 2026. In the food preparation coolers, there was a gallon of chocolate milk without a lid, a Chef's salad without a name or date, and a container of eggs for room [ROOM NUMBER]-B with no date. There was an uncovered container with garbage near a clean rack of pitchers. On the second shelf of a wire rack, there was an undated container of cereal. In the dry storage area, there was a box of tea bags in an open plastic bag. During an interview on June 7, 2026, at 12:10 p.m., the Dietary Director confirmed that the items observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe, clean, and comfortable environment was maintained on two of four nursing units. (Second and Third Floors)Findings include: Observation on June 7, 2026, from 11:03 a.m. through 1:53 p.m., June 8, 2026, from 11:00 a.m. through 2:36 p.m., and June 9, 2026, from 9:15 a.m. 11:21 a.m. revealed the following: On the second-floor unit, there was a pervasive urine odor in the corridor. In the shower room on unit two, the left shower stall had debris on the floor and there was a wet washcloth tied around the hose of the shower sprayer. There was rust on the metal ceiling tile separators in the left shower. There was peeling wallpaper above the bathroom door, and a brown stain on the wallpaper behind the door. The screws holding the metal toilet paper holder in the wall were loose and it was hanging down, and there was a rusty outlet cover near the sink. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a strong, pervasive, odor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet each resident's needs for three of 33 sampled residents. (Residents 1, 73, 149)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, dementia, and wasting muscles. Review of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) section of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 1 was to have a care plan developed for fall prevention. Review of the clinical record revealed no evidence that a care plan was developed for interventions to prevent falls. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cellulitis of left lower limb, pressure ulcer of right ankle, and pressure induced deep tissue damage. On May 21, 2026, the physician ordered for staff to provide wound treatments to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain activities of daily living (grooming and hygiene) for two of 33 sampled residents. (Residents 8, 10)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 8 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a right-side dominant stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus, polyneuropathy (damage to multiple peripheral nerves throughout the body resulting in symmetrical numbness), and need for assistance with personal care. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 8 and was dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), including personal hygiene (including daily skin checks), bathing, and dressing. Review of the care plan revealed that staff were to assist the resident with hygiene, bathing and dressing, and his preference was to be awake daily between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physicians' orders for three of 33 sampled residents. (Residents 3, 33, 87) Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included severe chronic kidney disease and heart failure. A physician's order dated March 9, 2026, directed staff to weigh Resident 3 every seven days and call the cardiologist if weight gain was more than three pounds. Review of Resident 3's 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April, May, and June, revealed no evidence that weekly weight checks were completed on five of seven occasions from April 14, 2026, through June 5, 2026. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 33 had diagnoses that included hypotension (low blood pressure) and chronic kidney disease. A physician's order dated April 14, 2026, directed staff to administer 10 milligrams (mg) of a blood pressure medication (midodrine) three times daily. The physician ordered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent new or worsened pressure ulcers for one of five sampled residents with wounds. (Resident 3)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Skin Integrity and Wound Management, last reviewed March 1, 2026, revealed that a licensed nurse was to perform and document skin inspections on residents weekly and with any significant change of condition. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included a muscle disorder and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident 3 was cognitively impaired, was dependent on assistance from staff for activities of daily living, and had a stage three pressure wound on her left heel. Review of the care plan revealed the resident had actual skin breakdown on her left heel, was at risk for further skin impairment, and included an intervention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and assess the nutritional status for two of 33 sampled residents. (Residents 2, 80) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Weights and Heights, last reviewed March 1, 2026, revealed that residents would be weighed upon admission and/or readmission, then weekly for four weeks and monthly thereafter, and staff would enter the weight into the electronic health record.Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes, gastrostomy malfunction, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). On May 12, 2026, the physician ordered for staff to obtain a weight every Monday for four weeks then monthly on the first of the month. Review of Resident 2's care plan revealed the resident was at risk for a nutritional problem and dehydration with an intervention to monitor the resident's weight per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications/biologicals were properly stored per facility policy on one of four nursing units. (Third Floor) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Medication Administration, last reviewed March 1, 2026, revealed medications were to be administered at the time they were prepared. Observations during the medication pass on June 7, 2026, at 9:35 a.m., revealed that two uncovered medication cups labeled with black marker in a medication cart on the third floor contained two residents' medications. In an interview at that time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 confirmed she had poured the medications into medication cups earlier but did not administer them at that time. In an interview on June 9, 2026, at 1:47 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed the medications should not have been stored in cups in the medication cart prior to administration. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on a review of employee personnel and education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each nurse aide (NA) received 12 hours of in-service training annually, including training for dementia management, resident abuse prevention, and identified performance weaknesses for one of five nurse aides reviewed. (NA 1)Findings include:Review of NA 1's personnel record revealed that they had been employed by the facility since November 2, 2015.Review of facility training records dated July 1, 2024, to June 8, 2026, revealed that NA 1 completed only nine hours and 29 minutes of in-service education.In an interview on June 9, 2026, at 10:39 a.m., the Administrator confirmed that NA 1 had not completed the required annual in-service training.28 Pa. Code 201.19(7) Personnel policies and procedures.28 Pa. Code 201.20(a)(6)(d) Staff development.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on two of three nursing units. (Second and Third floors)Findings include: Observations on July 15, 2025, from 7:30 a.m. through 2:30 p.m. revealed the following environmental issues: Roof shingles were missing over the Heritage Wing of the first floor. Ceiling tiles and wallpaper were peeling in bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Ceiling tiles were peeling in bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The wallpaper below the sink and above the window was damaged in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A wall was damaged in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Wallpaper was peeling behind the bed in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The wall near the door of the second floor lounge was damaged. Ceiling tiles in the second floor dining room near the storage door were damaged. Wallpaper was peeling in the activity room by the office door. Ceiling tiles in the second floor in the lounge with the vending machines were damaged. The vent hose for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,036 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-08-16
• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-08-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA