Montgomeryville Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitati
640 Bethlehem Pike, Montgomeryville, PA 18936 · For profit - Corporation · 155 certified beds · (215) 368-4350 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (82%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.3% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.0% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.5% | 20.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.4% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.9% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.3% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 26.9% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.0% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.60 | 1.62 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 18.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.7%CMS range 39.6–57.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.8–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 18.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 31.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 18.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.4%CMS range 2.8–8.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.83 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 57.3 residents a day — about 37% occupied, or roughly 98 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.36 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physicians' orders for two of 12 sampled residents. (Residents 4 and 159) Findings include: In an interview on June 26, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., the Director of Nursing stated that once a medication is administered, it should be recorded onto the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR). If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, or given at an other time other than what is scheduled, the reason should be documented on the MAR. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 4 had diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure). On June 11, 2025, the physician ordered staff to administer a blood pressure medication (hydralazine hydrochloride) three times a day. Staff was not to administer the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the first measurement of blood pressure when the heart beats and the pressure is at its highest) was less than 100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Review of Resident 4's MAR for June 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietary services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: During an interview on June 24, 2025, at 11:45 a.m., the Food Service Director stated the facility did not employ a qualified dietary manager. There was no evidence that the facility had a qualified dietary services manager or a full-time dietitian. In an interview conducted on June 25, 2025, at 1:00 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that there was not a full-time dietitian employed at the facility and that the facility did not employ a qualified dietary manager in the absence of a full-time dietitian. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the baseline care plan summary was provided to the resident and/or resident representative for two of 12 sampled residents. (Residents 5 and 110) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Person-Centered Care Plan, dated June 2, 2025, revealed that a baseline plan of care was to be developed within 48 hours of admission. The baseline care plan was to include healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident and must include initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy orders, social services, and pre-admission screening resident review, if applicable. The baseline care plan was to be updated as needed to meet the resident's needs until the comprehensive care plan was developed. The resident and/or representative were to be provided a written summary of the baseline care plan. Clinical record review revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner on one of one nursing unit. (Rehabilitation unit) Review of the facility policy entitled, Food Brought in for Residents, dated June 2, 2025, revealed that foods that required refrigeration were to be labelled with the resident's name and the date and then discarded after three days upon notification to the resident. Observation of the Rehabilitation unit resident pantry on June 25, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., revealed in the freezer, a container of ice cream in a bag, a bottle of water, and a juice drink that were not labelled or dated. In the refrigerator, there was a cup of coffee dated June 4, 2025, but was not labelled. There was an opened container of nectar thick lemon-flavored water with a use-by date of June 2, 2025, and a yogurt with a use-by date of June 23, 2025. There was a large plastic lid labelled fresh fruit directly touching the shelf, and there was no bottom part of the container in the refrigerator. There was a sandwich, a bagel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-30 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely notice of non-covered Medicare and other expenses for one of three sampled residents who had been discharged from the facility. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled Accounts Receivable Policies and Procedures, last reviewed February 1, 2024, revealed that facility was to conduct a 72 hour financial meeting with all new admissions. The business office was to discuss financial responsibilities of the resident/representative and set financial expectations essential to securing payment for services provided. In addition, the business office was to review the resident's current payer coverage (primary, secondary and tertiary) that included any private liability for co-insurance, co-pays and deductibles. Further review revealed that the first 20 days of Medicare days were 100% covered while in the facility. The next 21-100 days required a monetary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to enhance each resident's quality of life by offering showers as scheduled to two of seven sampled residents. (Residents 1, 7) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, seizures, and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had cognitive impairment and required staff assistance for bathing. According to the task flowsheet, the resident was to receive a shower twice per week, on Monday and Thursday. There was no documented evidence that Resident 1 was showered on July 8 or 18, 2024. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 had diagnoses that included heart failure. The MDS assessment, dated May 10, 2024, indicated that the resident had no cognitive impairment and required staff assistance for bathing. The resident was to receive a shower twice per week, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a change in condition for one of seven sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, seizures, and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set assessment, dated May 13, 2024, indicated that the resident had cognitive impairment. Review of a nurse's note dated June 30, 2024, revealed that Resident 1's right buttock was observed to be red and irritated with new orders from the physician to cleanse the area with normal saline solution, pat dry, and apply barrier cream and a foam border dressing. Review of a wound care progress note dated July 19, 2024, revealed that Resident 1 had a new left-sided anterior neck abrasion with orders to cleanse with wound cleanser and leave open to air. There was no documented evidence that the resident's representative was notified of the changes in condition. In an interview on July 30, 2024, at 12:45 p.m., the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on May 19, 2024, at 9:20 a.m., revealed the following: On a food preparation surface with a microwave, there was an open Pepsi bottle, a staff drink cup, an apron, a mask, crumbs and debris, Styrofoam cups, and plastic lids. The corner of the wall at the entry way was marred and peeling. There was an accumulation of food that remained in the dish machine trap. In an interview, Dietary Aide (DA) 1 stated that the dish machine had not yet been used on that date. On the bottom shelf of a food preparation surface, there was an accumulation of debris that included dust and crumbs on a case of corn starch. There was a rolling cart in the hot food preparation area with a ladle and an open container of powdered potatoes on the cart. In an interview, [NAME] 1 stated that the potatoes had not been used on that date and were left out and uncovered from the previous day. There was an accumulation of a dried,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident environment in a safe, clean and homelike manner for two of three nursing units. (Rehab and Second floor) Findings include: Observations on May 19, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., on the Rehab nursing unit revealed that in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a piece of tile missing next to the door. In resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER], there were chunks of paint missing on the wall. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER], there were two small holes in the wall where the glove rack had been hanging, but the rack was missing. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER], white splatter was observed at the bottom of the door. There were stained ceiling tiles in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and in the hallway near Resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. The central bathing area on the Rehabilitation unit did not have soap in the dispenser by the sink and the toilet tank cover was missing. Observations made during an environmental tour on May 19, 2024, at 10:14 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and assess resident weights and weight changes for five of 14 reviewed residents who were at risk for weight loss. (Residents 36, 73, 84, 95, 122) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Weights and Heights, last reviewed February 1, 2024, revealed that residents were to be weighed upon admission and/or re-admission, then weekly for four weeks and monthly thereafter. Additional weights may be obtained at the discretion of the interdisciplinary care team. In an interview on May 21, 2024, at 1:24 p.m., the Director of Nursing stated that reweighs should be completed the next day. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 36 had diagnoses that included dementia and heart disease. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident had an alteration in nutritional status due to dementia and weight loss with an intervention to review monthly weights and notify the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by providing access to the call bell system for one of 34 sampled residents. (Resident 124) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 124 had diagnoses that included depression. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident was at risk for falls and that staff was to reinforce the need to call for assistance. On May 19, 2024, from 9:52 a.m. through 1:16 p.m., the resident was observed lying in bed. There was no call bell plugged into the system for the resident's side of the room. On May 20, 2023, at 9:53 a.m., the resident was observed lying in bed. There was no call bell plugged into the system for the resident's use. On May 21, 2024, from 9:12 a.m. through 12:08 p.m., the resident was observed lying in bed. The call bell was on the nightstand, out of reach. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for two of 34 sampled residents. (Residents 106, 107) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 106 was transferred to and admitted to the hospital for a change in condition on April 14, 2024. There was no Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed to reflect that the resident was discharged from the facility. In an interview on May 22, 2024, at 9:57 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed an MDS assessment had not been completed for Resident 106's discharge to the hospital. Clinical record review revealed that on March 29, 2024, the physician ordered hospice services for Resident 107. Review of a recent doctor's note dated May 1, 2024, revealed that the resident continued to be on hospice services. There was no MDS assessment completed to reflect the significant change in his status. In an interview on May 22, 2024, at 9:50 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that a significant change MDS had not been completed for Resident 107 when he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet each resident's needs for three of 34 sampled residents. (Residents 121, 124, 296) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 121 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included acute pulmonary edema and congestive heart failure. There was no care plan developed to address Resident 121's needs. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 124 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included bacteremia and benign prostatic hyperplasia (urinary condition). On April 25, 2024, the physician ordered for Resident 124 to have an indwelling urinary catheter. There was no evidence that interventions to address Resident 124's urinary status and catheter were included in the current care plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 296 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for three of 34 sampled residents. (Residents 107, 115, 296) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 107 had diagnoses that included a history of sepsis (infection of the blood) and Alzheimer's disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had been on an antibiotic medication in the last seven days and that he had a primary medical condition of sepsis of an unspecified organism. On March 18, 2024, a physician ordered for staff to administer an antibiotic medication (amoxicillin) twice a day for seven days for a total of 14 doses of the medication. Review of the March 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR), revealed that staff had not administered the first dose of the antibiotic on March 18, 2024. Review of a nursing note dated March 18, 2024, revealed that the antibiotic was not administered because it had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services and treatment to prevent further limitations in range of motion for one of five sampled residents who had limitations in range of motion. (Resident 41) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 41 had a diagnosis of a stroke with hemiplegia, (paralysis), of the non-dominant left side. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident had some memory impairment and had limitations in range of motion on one side of the lower and upper extremities. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident had an activites of daily living deficit due to physician limitations. There was a current intervention for staff to apply a left resting hand splint in the morning and to remove it at night. In addition, there was a current physician order since March 8, 2024, for staff to apply the left resting hand splint every day to prevent contractures.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions to prevent accidents for two of five residents at risk for accidents. (Residents 2, 100). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury and history of falls. Review of Resident 2's care plan revealed he was at risk for falls with interventions for staff to provide music or YouTube videos and to provide a laptop to watch baseball games. On May 19, 2024, at 9:15 a.m. through 10:45 a.m., and 12:08 p.m. through 12:45 p.m., Resident 2 was observed in his wheelchair in the hallway with no music, videos, or laptop. On May 20, 2024, at 10:05 a.m. through 12:35 p.m., Resident 2 was again observed in his wheelchair in the hallway with no music, videos, or laptop. In an interview on May 22, 2024, at 12:13 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that staff should have provided music, YouTube videos, or a laptop to watch baseball games to Resident 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two residents who received dialysis. (Resident 39) Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled, Dialysis: Hemodialysis (HD) Provided by a Certified Dialysis Facility, last reviewed February 1, 2024, revealed that professional standards of practice included ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding HD care and services. The care of the patient who received HD reflected ongoing communication, coordination, and collaboration between the center and dialysis staff. Communication included medication administration and changes, advanced directive and code status, and changes to functional status or falls. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 39 had diagnoses that included hypertension, heart failure, and end stage renal disease. Review of the resident's dialysis communication forms revealed that the pre-treatment report, which included code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a individualized, person-centered plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for one of 34 sampled residents. (Resident 84) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 84 had diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety, aphasia (impaired ability to understand or form language), and PTSD. Further review of the resident's clinical record revealed that there were no resident specific interventions to meet the resident's needs for minimizing triggers or preventing re-traumatization. In an interview on May 22, 2024, at 11:51 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed the resident had a diagnoses of PTSD, and no individualized care plan was developed. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were acted upon by the physician for one of 34 sampled residents. (Resident 111) Findings include: A review of the facility policy entitled, Medication Regimen Review, last reviewed February 1, 2024, revealed that the facility was to ensure that the attending physician, Medical Director, and Director of Nursing (DON) were provided with copies of the medication regimen reviews. The attending physician should document in the resident's record that an irregularity was reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it. The attending physician should have addressed the consultant pharmacist's recommendation on their next scheduled visit to the facility to assess the resident, and no later than 60 days. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 111 had diagnoses that included dementia and insomnia. On October 31, 2023, the physician ordered for staff to administer melatonin (a hormone that assisted with sleep)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's preference at meal times had been accommodated for two of 34 sampled residents. (Residents 49, 126) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 49 had diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and atrial fibrillation. Reivew of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 49's care plan revealed she had a nutritional risk with an intervention for staff to honor food preferences. In an interview on May 19, 2024, at 12:43 p.m., the resident stated that she often didn't receive the food that she ordered. According to the resident's meal selection sheet (a document completed weekly by the resident to select food choices) she requested spinach, egg, and cheese casserole for lunch that day. When her lunch tray was observed at 12:50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a therapeutic diet was provided as recommended by a registered dietician to one of 14 sampled residents who were at risk for weight loss. (Resident 43) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 43 had diagnoses that included rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of muscle tissue), diabetes, and anemia. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was alert and oriented, had weight loss, was not on a prescribed weight loss program, and was on a therapeutic diet. Review of a registered dietician's note dated March 7, 2024, revealed that the resident had a weight loss, had a good appetite, and that the resident stated he feels that breakfast portions can sometimes be too small. At that time, the dietician documented that the resident was to be provided with double portions at meals. Review of the facility master diet guide sheet revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review, observation, and family, resident, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served at regularly scheduled times, in a timely manner, and in accordance with the residents' needs on one of three the nursing units. (Second floor nursing unit) Findings include: Review of the facility meal times schedule revealed that lunch was to arrive on the nursing units between 11:30 a.m. and 1:00 p.m On May 19, 2024, at 12:45 p.m., confidential staff interviews on the second floor nursing unit revealed that the lunch was being served very late today and had been served late on other occasions. In a confidential interview on May 19, 2024, at 1:09 p.m., a family member of a resident on the second floor stated that meals were frequently served late. Observation at that time revealed that the resident of this family member did not receive lunch until 1:15 p.m., 15 minutes after the latest scheduled time for the meals to arrive on the nursing units. In an interview on May 19, 2024, at 1:00 p.m., Residents 32 and 34…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that safety interventions were implemented during a transfer from bed to chair for one of four sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included brain bleed, stroke, and bipolar disorder. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was non-ambulatory, dependent upon staff for care, and required the assistance of two staff with the use of a lift for transfers out of bed. The resident's care plan dated March 23, 2024, directed staff to provided full assistance of two staff members with the use of a lift for all transfers out of bed. Nursing documentation dated March 28, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., indicated that the resident was heard yelling for staff while seated in her wheelchair in her room. The resident stated that her head got bumped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process to prepare residents for discharge for one of three sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Discharge with Medications, dated February 1, 2024, revealed that staff was to review the medication orders and directions for use with the resident before the resident's discharge to home with the medications and to document this review in the resident's medical record. Review of facility policy entitled, Discharge Planning Process, dated February 1, 2024, revealed that staff was to provide a copy of the Discharge Transition Plan and Discharge Packet to all residents discharging to home. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included diabetes, end stage renal disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of three sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record reivew revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included diabetes, anemia, sepsis and chronic pressure ulcers. On January 3, 2024, a physican directed staff to schedule a cardiology consultation for the resident. Clinical record review revealed that as of February 12, 2024, the consultation was not scheduled. In an interview of February 12, 2024, at 12:05 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the consultation was not scheduled as ordered by the physician. 28 Pa. Code 211.12 (d)(1)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party of a change in treatment for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Change in Condition: Notification of, dated February 2023, revealed that the Center must immediately inform the resident's representative when there was a need to alter treatment significantly such as a need to discontinue, change, or commence a treatment. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, seizures, and diabetes. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had memory impairment. On January 4, 2024, based on electrocardiogram results, the physician directed staff to hold the medications, amiodarone and Toprol-XL until the resident was seen by the cardiologist for a scheduled consultation on March 24, 2024.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and assess significant weight loss for one of three sampled residents at risk for weight loss. (Residents 2) Findings Include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included anemia, diabetes mellitus, and [NAME] Syndrome (a genetic disorder that causes physical, mental and behavioral problems, including a constant sense of hunger). Review of a wound assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had multiple pressure wounds. Review of the care plan revealed a potential for nutrition problems. On October 20, 2023, the resident weighed 161.2 pounds (lbs.). On November 17, 2023, the resident weighed 138.2 lbs., which reflected a 14.2 percent significant weight loss. On December 1, 2023, the resident weighed 126.4 lbs., which reflected a further significant weight loss of 8.5 percent. There was no evidence that the dietitian addressed the resident's continued weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the responsible party was notified of a change in condition in medical status and a fall for one of four sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure, diabetes and atrial fibrillation. On October 19, 2023, a physician noted that the resident had a urinary tract infection (UTI) and ordered an antibiotic medication to treat the UTI. There was no documented evidence that the responsible party was notified of this change in medical condition. In addition, review of an incident report dated October 21, 2023, revealed that the resident had experienced a fall and had been found on the floor, lying on her back in her room. Review of nursing documentation dated October 22, 2023, at 12:00 a.m., revealed that nursing staff was to make the day shift nurse aware of the fall and to notify the responsible party of the fall in the morning. There was no documented evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered medications were obtained from the pharmacy for one of four sampled residents. ( Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. with diagnoses that included metastatic cancer and intractable nausea and vomiting. On May 21, 2023 the physician ordered staff to administer a medication to lessen anxiety (Ativan) every twelve hours sublingually (under the tongue). Review of nursing documentation revealed that as of May 23, 2023, the medication had not yet been delivered by the pharmacy. In an interview on August 9, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. , the Director of Nursing confirmed that the medication was not provided timely by the pharmacy. 28 Pa. Code 211.19(a)(d) Pharmacy services. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe, clean, and comfortable environment was maintained on three of three nursing units. (Rehabilitation, First and Second floor) Findings include: Observations on the rehabilitation nursing unit on May 30, 2023, at 11:26 a.m., through May 31, 2023, at 10:40 a.m., revealed the following: In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were heavily marred walls and peeling wallpaper by the door. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom floor was heavily stained, the baseboard behind the toilet was missing, the toilet was loose, and the bathroom had a strong pervasive urine odor. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a brown stained ceiling tile over the television. In rooms 14, 15, 23, 27, and 30 the walls were heavily marred and scratched. During tour of the first floor nursing unit on May 30, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. through May 31, 2023, at 1:30 p.m. the following observations were made: In room [ROOM NUMBER], a dried brown substance was observed around the base…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for six of 25 sampled residents. (Residents 50, 65, 97, 114, 115, 116) Findings include:. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 50 had a diagnosis of end-stage kidney disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified that the resident received hospice services and a care plan should have been developed to address the hospice services. Review of the care plan revealed that the facility did not develop interventions to address hospice care. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 65 had a diagnosis that included dementia. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE], identified that the resident received hospice services and a care plan should have been included on the resident's care plan. Review of the care plan revealed that the facility did not develop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis for three of 25 sampled residents. (Residents 41, 97, 115) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 41 had diagnoses that included osteoarthritis and spinal stenosis. There was a physician's order, dated May 1, 2023, for staff to provide the resident with narcotic pain medication (oxycodone) every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the May 2023, medication administration records (MARs) and nursing notes revealed there was a lack of documentation to support that the resident was offered non-pharmacological interventions prior to or in conjunction with the administration of the as needed pain medication on 20 of 39 occurrences. On May 23, 2023, the physician's order changed for staff to administer the as needed narcotic pain medication (oxycodone) every four hours as needed for pain. Review of the May 2023, MARs and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions on the nursing units. (Rehabilitation and Second floor nursing units) Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Food Brought in for Patients/Residents, last reviewed February 14, 2023, revealed that all items would be labeled and dated with the resident's name and date that the food was brought in and that after three days would be discarded. Observation of the refrigerator on the rehabilitation nursing unit on May 31, 2023, at 12:59 p.m. revealed a container of takeout food and lunch bags that were brought into the facility and were not labeled or dated. There were numerous dried liquid stains throughout the refrigerator. Observation of the refrigerator on the second floor nursing unit on May 31, 2023, at 11:45 a.m., revealed a container of mixed vegetables, two unidentified food items wrapped in foil, and a container of salad that were brought into the facility and were not labeled or dated. The shelves of the refrigerator had numerous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to enhance each resident's quality of life by offering showers as scheduled to two of 25 sampled residents. (Residents 119, 384) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 119 had diagnoses that included right arm fracture and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was oriented and required staff assistance for bathing. The resident was to receive a shower twice per week and as needed. During an interview on May 31, 2023, at 11:30 a.m., the resident reported that she preferred to take a shower twice a week and was not offered the opportunity to do so. Review of documentation in the clinical record revealed that the resident was not offered a shower four of nine scheduled times in the past 30 days. There was a lack of documentation to support that Resident 119 was consistently provided the opportunity to have a shower as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently provide treatments for a pressure ulcer for one of 25 sampled residents. (Resident 116) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included a pressure ulcer and anemia. On February 2, 2023, a nurse noted that the resident had a Stage II pressure ulcer to her coccyx and the physician ordered for staff to provide wound care and change the dressing daily. Review of the current care plan revealed that the resident had a pressure ulcer and that staff were to provide treatments as ordered. In an interview on May 31, 2023, at 11:20 a.m., Resident 116 stated that staff do not always provide wound care as ordered. Review of the treatment administration records for February through May 2023, revealed that treatments were not provided as ordered on February 4, 5, 10, and 14, March 2 and 16, April 3 and 20, and May 2,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of nine sampled residents with impairment. (Resident 3) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus and difficulty walking. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was oriented and needed some staff assistance for activities of daily living, such as transferring and walking. A physical therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE], noted that the resident was evaluated for transferring positions, walking, and functional mobility. The discharge recommendations were for Resident 3 to have a home exercise program and to be referred for a restorative nursing program. On June 1, 2023, at 9:15 a.m. Resident 3 stated that staff did not assist her with restorative exercises. There was a lack of documentation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to assess bladder incontinence for two of 25 sampled residents (Residents 116, 119) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Continence Management, last reviewed February 14, 2023, revealed that facility staff was to complete a urinary incontinence assessment upon admission or re-admission and with a change in condition or change in continence status. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection and anemia. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated April 6, 2023, the resident was easily understood, and needed extensive assistance from staff for toileting. The assessment further indicated that the resident was frequently incontinent of urine and was not on a toileting program. There was no documentation in the clinical record to support that the resident's urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one sampled resident reviewed for tracheostomy. (Resident 45) Findings include: The facility policy entitled, Tracheostomy Care, last reviewed on February 14, 2023, revealed that tracheostomy care was to be done at least twice a day and as needed per physician's orders. The policy included a statement to cleanse under the trach holder and to replace the trach holder if soiled. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 45 had diagnoses that include acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy (an opening surgically made through the neck into the windpipe, which a tube/cannula allows the passage of air and supplemental oxygen), and laryngeal (voice box) cancer. Observation of Resident 45 on May 30, 2023, at 11:10 a.m. and May 31, 2023, at 10:40 a.m., revealed that Resident 45's tracheostomy collar was visibly soiled and encrusted with a dry green…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor residents on psychoactive medications for three of 25 sampled residents. (Residents 47, 50, 90) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Assessment Grid, dated February 14, 2023, revealed that staff was to assess and monitor a resident for abnormal involuntary movements and adverse side effects upon a new order for antipsychotic medication and every six months when on an antipsychotic medication. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Since admission, the physician ordered that the resident receive an antipsychotic medication (olanzapine). The care plan revealed that the resident was to be monitored for adverse side effects related to the use of this medication. There was no documentation in the clinical record to support that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, review of facility documentation, observation, and results of a test tray audit, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at acceptable temperatures on three of three nursing units. (Rehab, First floor, and Second floor nursing units) Findings include: During interviews on May 19, 2024, between 10:22 a.m. and 1:10 p.m., Residents 62, 88, and 144, stated that the food was often served cold. In a group interview conducted on May 20, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., Residents 60, 120, 126, and 134, stated that the food was often served cold. During interviews on May 20, 2024, between 11:00 a.m. and 12:45 p.m., Residents 20 and 66 stated that the food was often served cold. Review of the facility's Food and Nutrition Services Test Tray Evaluation, revealed that the temperature range of hot items should be greater than 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F). A test tray conducted on May 21, 2024, at 12:07 p.m., revealed chicken at a temperature of 120 degrees F, rice at a temperature of 119 degrees F, and corn at a temperature of 118 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS PM PA OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/15/2022 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/15/2022 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| WEILAND, JONATHON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/26/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395796. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.