Norriton Square Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
1700 Pine Street, Norristown, PA 19401 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (610) 239-7100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Sep 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.5% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.9% | 17.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.2% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.9% | 17.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.8% | 68.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.7% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.8% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.33 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.81 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.7%CMS range 45.3–68.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.1–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 27.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 14.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.8–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 91.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices related to care and maintenance of bedside commode in one of two nursing floors. (Second floor) Findings include: Observations on March 16, 2026, at 11:35 a.m. on the Second floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the nurse aide, Employee E4 demonstrated how to empty the bedside commode. Employee E4 lifted out the urine collection basin and removed an unlabeled grey plastic bag from the commode which was dripping a reddish colored liquid. Employee E4 put the bag into the urine collection basin and went into the resident's bathroom. Nurse aide, Employee E4 took the bag out of the basin and put it into the resident's trash can in the bathroom and dumped the liquid into the toilet. Employee E4 then went to the hand sink in the bathroom and put the basin under the faucet and turned on the water filling the basin about halfway. Employee E4 then went back to the toilet and dumped this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reviews of the established meal delivery schedule, interviews with dietary staff, observations of the food and nutrition services on the nursing units and a review of the dietary staffing schedules for the kitchen, it was determined that the facility failed to employ sufficient staff to carry out the functions of the dietary services department. Findings include: During the sanitation inspection of the main kitchen at 10:00 a.m., on January 20, 2026, the director of dietary services, Employee E7, reported that there were two dietary staff members that had called out of work on January 20, 2026. The only dietary staff working on January 20, 2026, were the director of dietary services, Employee E7, the cook, Employee E20 and a dietary aide, Employee E9. A review of the established meal delivery schedule from the food and nutrition services revealed that the third floor was to receive a meal cart at 11:40 a.m., and 11:50 a.m., daily and the dining room was to receive a food cart between noon and 1:00 p.m. A review of the established meal delivery schedule from the food and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater for one of four residents observed during medication administration (Resident R65).On January 21, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., review of physician orders for Resident R74 indicated orders for the following among other medications:Lisinopril Oral Tablet 20 MG (Lisinopril), Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN (Ordered on July 25, 2025)Venlafaxine HCl ER Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 Hour (Venlafaxine HCl), give 150 mg by mouth one time a day for depression (Ordered on July 25, 2025)Aspercreme Lidocaine External Cream 4 % (Lidocaine HCl), Apply to neck topically two times a day for pain (Ordered on August 11, 2025)Pataday Ophthalmic Solution 0.2 % (Olopatadine HCl), Instill 1 drop in both eyes one time a day for eye irritation (Ordered on September 5, 2025)Meloxicam Tablet 7.5 MG, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for OA (Ordered on October 3, 2025).On January 21, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to correctly administer medications in accordance with physician orders for one of four residents observed during medication administration observation, resulting in significant medication error (Residents R65).Findings Include:On January 21, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., review of physician orders for Resident R74 indicated orders for the following among other medications:Lisinopril Oral Tablet 20 MG (Lisinopril), Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HTN (Ordered on July 25, 2025)Venlafaxine HCl ER Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 Hour (Venlafaxine HCl), give 150 mg by mouth one time a day for depression (Ordered on July 25, 2025)Aspercreme Lidocaine External Cream 4 % (Lidocaine HCl), Apply to neck topically two times a day for pain (Ordered on August 11, 2025)Pataday Ophthalmic Solution 0.2 % (Olopatadine HCl), Instill 1 drop in both eyes one time a day for eye irritation (Ordered on September 5, 2025)Meloxicam Tablet 7.5 MG, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for OA (Ordered on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 32 Residents reviewed (R44).Findings Include: Review of Resident R44's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Encephalopathy (Encephalopathy is a term for any diffuse disease of the brain that alters brain function or structure), Anxiety disorder (Anxiety disorders are a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation), Bipolar disorder (Bipolar disorder is a mental illness that causes clear shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), Chronic Pain Syndrome (A condition where pain persists for 3-6 months or longer, typically extending beyond the expected healing time of an initial injury or illness) , and Depression (Depression is a common,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to acceptable standards of nursing practice related to medication administration for one of four residents observed during medication administration (Resident R65). Findings include:The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.11(b), General Functions of the Registered Nurse (RN), and 21.14(a), Administration of Drugs, indicated that the RN is fully responsible for all actions as a licensed nurse and is accountable to patients for the quality of care delivered, and administers medication ordered for the patient in the dosage and manner prescribed. The Pennsylvania Code, Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, State Board of Nursing, 21.145(a)(b), Functions of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), indicated that the LPN functions as a member of the health-care team by exercising sound nursing judgement based on preparation, knowledge, experience in nursing and competency,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based reviews of policies and procedures, clinical record reviews, observations of care and services, interviews with residents, staff and family members, it was determined that for one of four residents reviewed for emotional behavior, sensory, communication and dignity, the facility failed to ensure a fully functioning hearing device was available and used according to audiology assessment and care planning. (Resident R86)A review of the facility policy titled consultant agreements and responsibilities revealed that the facility was responsible for making arrangements for care and services for the residents that the facility does not employ as staff through a qualified professional outside service. According to the contract the consulting services were to be timely and the service was to be reported to the administrator through dated signed reports, implementation of plans and continued assessment of the resident. Observations of Resident R86 during the days of the survey, January 20, 2026, and January 22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon review of clinical records, interviews with staff and residents and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined the facility did not ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to follow the physician's orders for daily weights for one of twenty-two residents reviewed. (Resident R35)Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Weights and Heights with a revision date of June February 1, 2023 states, Obtaining and Documenting Weight- 1.1.4 If the body weight is not as expected, re-weigh the patient. Resident R35 was admitted to the facility July 1, 2025 with the following diagnosis: Hypertension (a chronic condition where blood forces against artery walls is consistently too high), Pressure Ulcer Stage 2 (a partial-thickness skin loss involving the epidermis and dermis), Anemia (a condition where your blood lacks enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to your body's tissues), Heart Failure (a chronic, manageable condition where the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews with staff, and review of facility policies it was determined that the facility failed to ensure prevention of accidents and hazards related to medications found at bedside for one of twenty-two residents reviewed. (Resident R3) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Medication Administration with a date of 2007 states, Policy- Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication. Further review of the Medication Administration policy revealed, Medication Administration. 4. Medications are administered at the time they are prepared. 5. The person who prepares the dose for administration is the person who administers the dose. On January 20, 2026, at 12:05 p.m. Resident R3's room was observed and Resident R3's father was interviewed due to the resident sleeping. During the interview the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication for one of one Dialysis-Residents reviewed (Residents R9).Review of Resident 9's clinical records indicated that R9 was admitted in the facility on May 10, 2025, with Diagnoses including Dependence on Renal Dialysis (refers to the mandatory, long-term use of artificial filtration (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) to replace lost kidney function).Review of physician order for R9, dated June 2, 2025, August 28, 2025, and January 16, 2026, revealed; Dialysis days: Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Time for Pick up: 5;30 a.m.Review of Resident R9 's Hemodialysis Communication Record revealed that it lacked the following information as required per the communication log:The portion on the Hemodialysis Communication Record marked to be completed by Center Licensed Nurse for Dialysis patient prior to hemodialysis treatment, on August 14, 2025; September 20, 2025; October 11, 2025; October 28, 2025; and November…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation related to missing medication for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse Prohibition dated October 24, 2022, revealed, Centers prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident/patient property, and exploitation for all residents. Continued review revealed, Misappropriation of patient property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a patient's belongings or money without the patient's consent. Review of Resident R1's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated June 4, 2025, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including cancer and chronic pain. Continued review revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for two of three residents reviewed (Residents R1 and R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Management of Controlled Drugs dated January 31, 2025, reveled, A complete count of all Schedule II-IV controlled substances is required at the change of shifts per state regulation or at any time in which the narcotic keys are surrendered from one licensed nursing staff to another. The count must be performed by two licensed nurses. Review of Resident R1's physician orders revealed an order, dated August 29, 2025, for oxycodone (opioid pain medication) 5 m.g (milligrams) give one tablet two times a day for chronic pain. Review of Controlled Substance Inventory Count Sheets revealed that Employee E7, licensed nurse, worked on the 3A medication cart on August 29, 2025, from 3:00 p.m. through August 30, 2025, at 7:00 a.m. During the 11:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, review of personnel files and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff received training on abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property as required for two of three nursing staff reviewed (Employees E4 and E8). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse Prohibition dated October 24, 2022, revealed, Training and reporting obligations will be provided to all employees through orientation, code of conduct training and a minimum of annually. Interview on September 4, 2025, at 10:19 a.m. Employee E4, agency licensed nurse, stated that it was her first day working at the facility. Employee E4, agency licensed nurse, stated that when she arrived for her shift, she was given report from the night nurse and showed around the nursing unit. Employee E4, agency licensed nurse, stated that she completed some online training prior to working at the facility but was unable to specify what topics were reviewed. Review of facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was maintained in safe and operating conditions related to the refrigerators in dining rooms for two of two floors reviewed. (Second and Third Floors). Findings Include: An initial tour of the third floor Dining Room was made on 11:55 a.m. on July 2, 2025. Observation of the dining service area for the third floor revealed the ice machine was leaking and had a towel on floor that was saturated as well as visible water around the area, this was confirmed by the Dietary staff, Employee E4. When asked what happens when there is a leak, Employee E4 stated, well, I do not know, that is a different department. Further review of the service area revealed two refrigerators not currently operable. One refrigerator underneath the counter had a Do Not Use sign on it and it had wet condensation on the outside of it. The other clear display refrigerator was in the front of the service area. Employee E4 stated they have not been working. An initial tour of the second floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to store food, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings Include: Review of facility Policy titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods, last revised February 2023 states, Policy Statement- All Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TSC) foods, frozen and refrigerated, will be appropriately stored in accordance with guidelines of the FDA Food Code. Procedures- 5. All foods will be stored wrapped or covered in containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. A tour of the facility kitchen area was conducted on July 2, 2025, at 10:05 a.m. with the Director of Dining Employee E3. During observation several items were observed in the walk-in refrigerator undated or labeled improperly. The first item was a container of prepared shredded carrots that had a labeled date of June 10, 2025 but no Use By date. When asked if the food is supposed to be labeled Employee E3 stated, I was told that we didn't need to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, interview staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of neglect related to provision of incontinence care for one of twelve residents reviewed. (Resident R12) Findings: Based on review of facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition dated October 24, 2022, revealed the center prohibits abuse mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, exploitation for all patients this is includes but not limited to freedom from corporal punishment and voluntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint, potential hires, training of employees, prevention of occurrences, identification of possible incidents or allegations which need investigation. Review of facility policy titled Neglect and Abuse revealed neglect is defined as a failure, in difference, or disregard of the center, its employees or service providers to provide care, comfort, safety, goods and services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, interview with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate number of nurse aides to meets the needs of residents on one of two nursing floors (2nd Floor) one of twelve residents reviewed. (Resident R12) Findings: Review of Resident R12's clinical record revealed the resident had diagnosis of non-displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (minimal displacement of the upper part of the left thigh bone), chronic embolism and thrombosis of vein (blood clot in the veins) diabetes with neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes), personal history of TIA (transient ischemic attack temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain, minor stroke). Review of Resident R12's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident's needs) dated February 14, 2025 revealed that the resident was assessed with a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 6, which indicated that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident R12's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs relating to a bariatric bed and a functioning heater for two of 31 residents reviewed.(Residents R251 and R248) Findings include: Review of Resident R251's Minimum Data Set (MDS-federal mandated assessment for all residents) dated February 12, 2025 revealed that Resident R251 was admitted into the facility on February 6, 2025 with diagnosis' including respiratory failure (respiratory system cannot maintain normal levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body), chronic congestive heart failure(long term condition , the heart is unable to pump blood effectively), type 2 diabetes(condition that occurs when blood glucose is too high) and morbid (severe) obesity (health condition that results from abnormally high body mass that is diagnoses by having a body mass index(BMI) greater then 40). Review Resident R251's lift transfer evaluations dated February 6, 2025, revealed Resident R251's weight dated February 6,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders related to diabetes management for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R24). Findings include: Review of Resident R24's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated January 20, 2025, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including diabetes (ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose). Review of physician orders for Resident R24 revealed an order, dated May 23, 2023, to check the resident's blood glucose level and notify the physician if greater that 400. Review of Resident R24's blood glucose levels revealed the following: On January 24, 2025, at 4:36 p.m. blood glucose level was 416; On January 1, 2025, at 8:32 p.m. blood glucose level was 416; On December 29, 2025, at 4:18 p.m. blood glucose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weekly weights were obtained for two out of twenty-four residents reviewed with a history of weight loss (Resident R39 and Resident R74). Findings include: Review of Resident R39's clinical record revealed that Resident R39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident R31's clinical record revealed the diagnoses of Huntington's Disease (neurogenerative disease), Dysarthria following Non-traumatic Sub-arachnoid Hemorrhage (cranial bleed), Dysphagia (inability/difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident R39's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated August 21, 2023 for the resident to be weight monthly every day shift starting on the 1st and ending on the 5th every month. Review of Resident R39's weight record revealed the following weight values in pounds (lbs.): May 1, 2024 - 150.4 lbs., June 19, 2024 - 135 lbs., July 2024 - no values recorded, August 6, 2024 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not maintain respiratory equipment according to professional standards of practice for two of twenty-four residents reviewed. (Resident R17 and Resident R56) Findings: Review of facility policy entitled Oxygen: Concentrator revealed that An Oxygen concentrator extracts oxygen molecules from room air. It can be used for low oxygen flows rates (i.e. 1-4 L/min). #9. Label, date, and attach pre-filled humidifier bottle, if applicable. Review of Resident R17's clinical record revealed that Resident R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with most recent readmission of February 2, 2025. Further review of Resident R17's clinical record revealed the following diagnoses Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure (excessive body fluid caused by a weakened heart muscle) and Atrial Fibrillation (irregular and rapid heart beat). Review of Resident R17's physician's orders revealed an order for: Oxygen at 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policies and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a medication cart was kept locked when not in use and that medications were properly stored for two of two carts. (Medication Cart A and Medication Cart B) Findings include: Review of facility documentation titled Medication Storage dated January 2025 revealed that medication storage and biologicals are stored properly to support safe effective drug administration. The pharmacy dispenses medication that meets state and federal labeling requirements, medications are to remain in containers and stored in a controlled environment this may include such containers as medication carts, medication rooms, and medication cabinets. Licensed nurses, pharmacy staff and those lawfully authorized to medications are to have access the medication carts. Medication should remain locked with not in the use or attended to by persons with authorized access. The medication supply shall be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel pharmacy personnel or staff members…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility did not provide foods in accordance with resident preferences for three of 24 residents reviewed (Residents R43, R42 and R19). Findings include: Review of resident R 43's quarterly minimum data set (MDS- a federal mandated assessment of all residents) December 24, 2025, revealed resident r 43 was admitted into the facility August 14, 202 with diagnosis' including coronary artery disease(CAD-Plaque buildup in the hearts arteries), heart failure, anxiety(disorder of episodes of intense anxiety and fear), schizophrenia(mental disorder characterized hallucinations, delusions and disorganized thinking and behavior). Resident 43 requires setup and cleanup assistance for dining. Review of resident R43's physician orders dated October 23, 2024, revealed an order for lacto- ovo vegetarian diet (a diet that excludes meat, poultry, and fish, but allows eggs and dairy products) Review of resident R 43 care plan revealed that resident R 43 is at nutritional risk related to underweight bmi(body mass…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to store food, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of facility Policy entitled Receiving revealed that under Policy Statement: Safe food handling procedures for time and temperature control will be practiced in transportation, delivery and subsequent storage of all food items. Under section Procedures: #5. All food items will be appropriately labelled and dated either through manufacturer packaging or staff notation. #7. All non-perishable foods and supplies will be stored appropriately Observation of the general kitchen area during the tour of the kitchen conducted on February 9, 2025, at 8:59 am revealed two metal shelving units against the wall of the kitchen. Observation of one of the shelving units revealed that the middle shelf of the metal shelving unit had a plastic bin with white powder. Further, the plastic bin was labelled breadcrumbs with label indicating opened 12/19/24 and use by 1.19.25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of personnel files and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that staff were licensed and registered in accordance with State laws for three of 11 personnel files reviewed (Employees E21, E17 and E16). Findings include: Review of facility documentation submitted to the Pennsylvania Department of Health on [DATE], at 4:33 p.m. revealed that on [DATE], the facility discovered that Employee E21, RN (registered nurse), was working with an expired nursing license and that the license had expired on [DATE]. The facility provided education to Employee E21, RN, including its policy that it is the responsibility of the employee to maintain an active nursing license at all times and that if the license is not current that the employee may not work until the license is active. Employee E21, RN, subsequently reactivated her nursing license on [DATE]. In response to the above incident, that facility conducted an audit of all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interviews and review of clinical records and facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) transmission for one of 31 residents reviewed. (Resident R35) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised December 16, 2024, revealed enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of novel or multidrug resistant organisms. It employs targeted personal protective equipment (PPE) during high contact resident activities. This includes all residents with any other following infection or colonization with targeted MDRO, chronic wounds, indwelling medical devices (eg: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheotomy). The use of personal protective equipment (PPE)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides received at least 12 hours of in-service education per year as required for one of six nurse aide personnel files reviewed (Employee E9). Findings include: Review of Employee E9's personnel file revealed that the employee was hired on June 20, 2019, as a nurse aide. Continued review revealed that from February 11, 2024, through February 10, 2025, Employee E9, nurse aide, completed only two courses of annual education: hand hygiene and personal protective equipment. Interview on February 10, 2025, at 12:52 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that Employee E9, nurse aide, had not completed 12 hours of annual in-service education as required. 28 Pa Code 201.19(7) Personnel policies and procedures 28 Pa Code 201.20(a) Staff development
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and the review of facility documentation, it was determined that the pharmacy failed to timely respond to the facility inquiry of a possible error in the dispensing of a medication for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Provider Pharmacy Requirements, with a date of January 2023 indicated that the provider pharmacy agrees to perform pharmaceutical services that include providing medications packaged in accordance with the nursing care center's need and equipment requirements and accurately dispensing prescriptions based on authorized prescriber orders. Review of the September 2024 physician orders indicated that Resident R1 had diagnosis that included cerebral infarction (a stroke); dysphasia (difficulty swallowing); aphasia (brain disorder that affects speaking and understanding language); heart disease, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Continued review of the September 2024 physician orders included a physician's order dated January 5, 2024, and monthly thereafter, for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview with residents and staff and review of facility documentation, it was determined that facility did not ensure residents were treated with dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes the enhancement of their quality of life related to fresh air breaks for thirteen of 19 residents reviewed (R6, R37, R45, R70, R36, R25, R54, R81, R26, R17, R64, R87, R10) Findings include: On April 3, 2024, at 10:30 a resident council meeting was held with 12 alert and oriented residents (R37, R45, R70, R36, R25, R54, R81, R26, R17, R64, R87, R10) all reported that they have a strong desire to have fresh air brakes during the day. All residents could not recall when they were allowed to go outside besides the leave of absence (LOA) visits upon approval. Three months of Resident Council minute notes were reviewed, and it was noted that on February 29, 2024, that residents requested to have fresh airtime. Four months of activity calendar was reviewed and there were no outside activities noted. On April 3, 2024, at 11:28 a.m. an interview was held with the activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of clinical records, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staff levels to provide nursing care and services for five of 19 residents reviewed (Residents R80, R78, R90, R73, R198 ). Findings include: On April 2, 2024, at 11:39 a.m. observation was taken place with Resident R80 who was in bed sleeping and there was a strong odor of fecees. On April 2, 2024, at 12:02 p.m. an family interview was held with a Resident R78 who is non-verbal. Family member was observed doing morning care to the resident due to lack of staffing. It was additionally noted that a family member visits 2-3 times a week, and there was an expectation from the staff for her to assist with morning care. On April 2, 2024, at 12:12 p.m. Resident R90 reported facility is short on staffing and need more people. On April 2, 2024, at 12:24 p.m. Resident R73 reported that she did not get a shower for a week and half due to lack insufficient staffing. I returned form leave of absence (LOA) from Easter holiday and did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of a resident's medical information on one of two nursing units (third floor). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) Compliance, reviewed and revised May 1, 2022 revealed, Policy: The Company has a long standing committment to protecting the privacy of Protected Health Information. The Company also has a further obligationto be compliant with the privacy standards contained in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA). The Company has developed policies and procedures to meet the following HIPPA requirements to: 4. Secure patient records containing protected health information such that they are not readily accessible by unauthorized parties. Observation on April 4, 2024 at 9:10 a.m. during Medication Administration revealed Employee E10 picking up the medication cup and proceeding to enter Resident R74's room to deliver medication. Employee E10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility's policies, review of clinical record and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one resident was free from misappropriation of medication for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R74). Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedure: Abuse Prohibition, reviewed and revised October 24, 2022, revealed, Centers prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for all patients. Misappropriation of patient property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a patient's belongings or money without the patient's consent. Physician orders for Resident R23 included an order for the resident to receive Eliquis (a blood thinner) 5 milligrams twice per day. Observation of medication administration on April 4, 2024 at 9:40 a.m with Employee E10, licensed nurse, revealed Employee E10 preparing medication for Resident R23 and determining that there was no Eliquis 5 mg available in his drawer. Employee E10 stated, I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, a review of select facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure ongoing evaluation of a resident's need and use of restraints, including evaluation of the least restrictive measure needed to treat the resident's medical symptom for one resident out of 19 sampled residents. (Resident R6) Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled Restraints -Use of, revised on June/15/2022 revealed Patients have the right to be free from any physical or chemical restrains imposed for purposes of discipline or convince, and not required to treat the patient's medical symptoms. Physical Restrain is defined as any manual method, physical or mechanical devise, equipment, or material that meets all of the following criteria: Is attached or adjacent to the patient's body, Cannot be removed easily by the patient, and restricts the patient's freedom of movement or normal access to their body, It further states Patients with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 'Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for three of 19 residents reviewed (Residents R6, R83, R86). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of encounter for surgical after care following surgery on the digestive system, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, parkinsonism, dysphagia, restlessness and agitation, age related physical debility, abnormal weight loss. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated March 11, 2024, revealed Resident 6's BIMS score was 99 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool to assess cognitive function; a score of 99 indicates that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a physician order was followed related to unplanned weight loss for one of 19 residents with weight loss reviewed (Resident R6). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of encounter for surgical after care following surgery on the digestive system, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, age related physical debility, abnormal weight loss. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment process conducted periodically to plan resident care) dated March 11, 2024, revealed Resident 6's BIMS score was 99 (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool to assess cognitive function; a score of 99 indicates that the resident was unable to provide or did not provide answers to complete this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free from hazards related to an unlocked medication cart and medication unsecured on the cart for one of two nursing units. Findings include: Observation of medication administration on April 4, 2024 at 9:15 a.m. revealed that the medication cart assigned to Employee E10, licensed nurse, was left on the second floor hallway unattended and unlocked. The cart was observed to have two medications left on top of the cart (Furosemide: a diuretic used to treat fluid retention and Ampicillin: an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections). Further observation revealed Employee E10 exiting a resident's room and walking down the second floor hallway to the unattended and unlocked medication cart. This observation was confirmed by Employee E10 when she returned to the cart at 9:17 a.m. Continued observation of medication pass revealed Employee E10 preparing medication for Resident R23. Employee E10 pushed medications through several blister packs and turned the blister…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide oxygen as ordered for two of 19 residents (Resident R43, R86). Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that Resident R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (excessive carbon dioxide in the bloodstream, typically caused by inadequate respiration) and hypoxia (deficiency in the amount of oxygen reaching the tissues) Review of Resident R43's physician's order dated March 5, 2024, indicated to administer three liters of oxygen via nasal cannula continuously. During an observation on April 2, 2024, at 10:15 a.m. Resident R43 observed having oxygen level at 3.5 liter. Then on April 3, 2024, at 4, 2024 at 10:15 a.m. observation was made having oxygen level at 2.5 liter. During the second observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of 19 residents reviewed (Resident R 47). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Reheating Resident Food and Beverages, revised June 2012, revealed Policy: to reduce the risk of Resident burns related to hot beverages, liquids and food, and to provide guidance on reheaing resident food and/or liquids. Staff members only are to reheat resident food and or liquids in the microwave to temperatures that are safe and palatable for residents. Procedure: 2. Items to be reheated are to be covered in the microwave. 4. Locate the dial thermometer available in the reheating area and wash with soap and running water to ensure thermometer is clean. 5. When item reheating is completed, staff member is to use a clean utensil to stir the item or liqid to ensure even heating throughout. The staff member is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documents and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to report a reportable incident via Event Reporting System to the local Department of Health DOH) for one of the 19 residents reviewed within the required and appropriate time frames. (Resident R83) Findings include: A review of a clinical record indicated that Resident R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnosis of anxiety disorder, dementia unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, disorientation. A further review of the progress notes dated, December 23, 2023, indicated resident visualized w/bed remote at neck, attempting to wrap cord around his neck. Verbalized he wanted to kill himself several times. Staff safety removed, cord, wires, and other self-harm items from within resident's reach .new order to send resident to nearest emergency room for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS PA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/02/2015 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| FULLER, REAUCHEAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2023 |
| GINSBERG, SUSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2023 |
| GENESIS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| POWERBACK REHABILITATION LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 396009. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.