Quakertown Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 137 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 125.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department and on one of two nursing units. (North unit)Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Food Storage: Cold Foods, dated December 18, 2025, revealed that staff were to label food items with the date prepared or opened. Observations during the kitchen tour on March 15, 2026, at 9:30 a.m., revealed the following:There was a thick layer of dust and debris on top of the dish machine. In the walk-in cooler, there were two boxes of cooked diced chicken on top of milk crates with milk stored in them. The bottom box of chicken, that was in contact with the milk crates, had a red stain on it. There was a box of raw chicken fillets touching the floor. On a shelf, there was an opened butter package with a brown substance on the bottom, and both were in contact with the shelf. There was a container of sweet and sour sauce labelled with a use by date of March 10, 2026. There were two large containers of sour cream…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the resident environment in a sanitary and homelike manner in the main lobby and on one of two nursing units. (North Nursing Unit)Findings include: Observation on March 15, 2026, from 9:45 a.m. to 2:15 p.m., and March 17, 2026, from 9:15 a.m. to 12:45 p.m., revealed the following: Two chairs in the lobby had torn cushions; one with a dark liquid stain on the seat cushion. The lobby wall adjacent to the reception desk had chipped paint and black marks. There were also black marks on the walls across from the reception desk. There were missing floor tiles in front of resident laundry. On the North Nursing unit, the hallway walls between resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were stained with brown streaks under the chair rail molding and there were red stains on the baseboard between resident rooms 101 and103. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a yellow stain on the floor. In resident room [ROOM NUMBER], the privacy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physicians' orders were implemented for two of 25 sampled residents. (Residents 12 and 14)Findings include:Review of the policy entitled, Medication Administration, General Guidelines, last reviewed December 18, 2025, revealed that staff were to obtain vital signs if necessary, and document necessary medication administration information. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 12 had diagnoses that included hypotension (low blood pressure). A physician's order dated March 1, 2026, directed staff to administer a medication (midodrine) once a day for hypotension. Staff were not to administer the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the first measurement of blood pressure when the heart beats and the pressure is at its highest) was more than 130 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). Review of Resident 12's medication administration record (MAR) for March 2026 revealed that staff administered the medication 16 times with no evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform a skin treatment as ordered by the physician for one of three sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included a history of an infection of the toes. Since November 4, 2025, the physician ordered that staff clean both great toes and apply an antibacterial ointment (bacitracin). In an interview on January 30, 2026, Resident 1 stated that three days prior on January 27, 2026, the nurse did not perform this treatment. Review of the Treatment Administration Records revealed no documented evidence that nursing staff performed the treatment on January 27, 2026, as ordered by the physician.28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(5) Nursing services.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, resident interview, results of a test tray audit, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was at an appetizing temperature on one of two nursing units. (North Unit) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Food Prep, dated December 18, 2025, revealed that hot food served to residents should be greater than 135 degrees Fahrenheit, and cold food items no greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). In interviews on January 10, 2026, at 11:40 a.m. through 12:00 p.m., Residents 1, 2 and 3 stated that food was often served cold. Results of a test tray audit conducted on January 10, 2026, at 12:33 p.m., after the last resident meal tray was served from the dining cart, revealed the crunchy buttermilk chicken was served at a temperature of 126.5 degrees F and the green beans were served at a temperature of 132 degrees F. Both food items were cool to taste. In an interview during this observation period, the Dietary Manager stated that the hot food should have achieved a temperature of 135 degrees F or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to record food temperatures at the time of service in the main kitchen.Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Food Prep, dated December 18, 2025, revealed that food temperature would be recorded at the time of service and monitored periodically during meal service. A review of the facility's food temperature log on January 10, 2026, at 12:15 p.m., revealed that there was no documented evidence that the holding food temperatures were obtained at the time of or during service for breakfast and lunch to ensure that the food maintained safe internal temperatures. In an interview during this observation period, the Dietary Manager stated that the food temperatures should have been recorded for breakfast and lunch at the time of service. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee. 28 Pa, Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for residents on two of two nursing units. (South Wing and North Wing) Findings include: Observation from February 4, 2025, between 9:45 a.m. and 1:35 p.m., February 5, 2025, between 8:20 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., and 12:15 p.m. and 2:21 p.m., and February 7, 2025, between 9:10 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. revealed the following: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were heavily marred. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were marred and the closet was missing both doors. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the closet was missing both doors. In room [ROOM NUMBER] bed H, the fan had a heavy accumulation of dust and dirt. In room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, there was a broken floor tile in front of the toilet and a water-stained ceiling tile. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were heavily marred. In room [ROOM NUMBER], the walls were heavily marred. In the bathroom, there was a large hole in the drywall on the right side of the wall.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed to accurately reflect the current status of one of 26 sampled residents. (Resident 7) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 7 had diagnoses that included bipolar disorder and heart failure. On May 17, 2024, the resident weighed 152.4 pounds. On November 1, 2024, the resident weighed 173.6 pounds, which reflected a significant weight gain of 13.9% in the last six months. Review of the physician's orders revealed that Resident 7 had been receiving an antipsychotic medication, olanzapine (a medication that affected brain activities) since May 17, 2024. Review of the November 2024 medication administration record revealed that Resident 7 received olanzapine during the MDS review period. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], incorrectly indicated in section K that Resident 7's weight was 146 pounds, which was not a weight reflected in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of 26 sampled residents. (Residents 112, 115) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included chronic kidney failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Care Area Assessment (CAA) summary dated August 24, 2024, noted that the resident's urinary incontinence was to be addressed in the care plan. The quarterly MDS summary dated November 7, 2024, indicated the resident was frequently incontinent of urine. There was no evidence that interventions to address Resident 112's urinary incontinence were included in the current care plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes seizures) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide person-centered pain management consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 26 sampled residents. (Resident 20) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Pain Management Policy, last reviewed October 15, 2024, revealed that the physician ordered PRN (as needed) pain medications were to have defined parameters for use. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 20 had diagnoses that included chronic venous insufficiency (a condition in which the veins have problems sending blood from the legs back to the heart), lymphedema (tissue swelling caused by an accumulation of protein-rich fluid drained through the lymphatic system), and Parkinson's disease. There were physician's orders dated November 27, 2024, for the resident to receive the narcotic pain medication tramadol every eight hours as needed for pain (failed to identify pain parameters), ibuprofen every eight hours as needed for pain (failed to identify pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA