Mifflin Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 136 beds and averages 130.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered medications were available from the pharmacy for one of four sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included adrenocortical insufficiency and peripheral vascular disease. A review of the care plan revealed interventions for staff to administer medications as ordered by the physician. On January 17, 2026, the physician ordered for staff to administer hydrocortisone (steroid used to treat adrenal insufficiency and swelling) every eight hours and oxycodone (a pain medication) every six hours as needed. On January 17, 2026, at 6:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., a nurse documented the hydrocortisone was not administered because it was unavailable from pharmacy. On January 17, 2026, at 1:32 p.m. a nurse noted that she was unable to administer the oxycodone medication at that time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the responsible party was notified in a timely manner of a scheduled appointment for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included fracture of the left lower leg, muscle weakness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was able to communicate needs to staff and required extensive assistance from staff for transfers. Review of a nurse's note dated January 23, 2026, revealed that the resident had returned from an orthopedic appointment. In an interview on January 27, 2026, at 12:30 p.m., Resident 1 stated that she would have liked if someone would have called her daughter about the appointment so that she could have made plans to attend. There was no documentation to support that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to address bowel incontinence in the resident's comprehensive care plan for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included fracture left lower leg, hypertension (high blood pressure), and muscles weakness. The Minimum Data Set assessment and Care Area Assessment summary dated January 15, 2026, noted that the resident had bowel incontinence and it was to be addressed in the care plan. There was no evidence that interventions to address Resident 1's bowel incontinence were included in the care plan. In an interview on January 27, 2026, at 3:10 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no documented evidence that interventions for bowel incontinence were included in Resident 1's care plan. 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(5) Nursing services.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order was implemented for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and muscle weakness. On January 23, 2026, a physician gave a verbal order that directed staff to collect a stool sample to rule out Clostridium difficile (an inflammation of the colon). There was no documented evidence that the stool sample was collected as ordered. In an interview on January 27, 2026, at 3:15 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the stool sample was not collected as ordered. CFR 483.25 Quality of CarePreviously cited 12/19/25 28 Pa. Code 211.12(d)(1)(3)(5) Nursing services.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physicians' orders were implemented for one of 25 sampled residents. (Residents 11) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 11 had diagnoses that included constipation, a history of a paralytic ileus (when the intestines failed to contract properly that could lead to a blockage), and diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was alert and oriented, was always incontinent of bowel, and required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene. Physicians' orders dated June 18, 2025, directed staff to administer a laxative (polyethylene glycol) as needed if there was no bowel movement in three days, a second medication (milk of magnesia) was to be given at bedtime on the third day since a bowel movement, a bisacodyl suppository was to be given for constipation on the shift after the milk of magnesia was given, and a saline laxative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess indwelling urinary catheters in accordance with facility policy for one of two sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. (Resident 11) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Catheter: Indwelling Urinary-Care of, last revised March 14, 2025, revealed that staff was to provide catheter care twice per day and as needed. Catheter care included performing inspection, assessment for signs or symptoms of infection or trauma, and routinely cleaning the catheter tubing. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 11 had diagnoses that included a blockage in his bladder, an enlarged prostate, diabetes, and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident was alert and oriented and required the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. On June 19, 2025, a physician's order directed staff to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to properly serve food and maintain sanitary conditions in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Food: Preparation, last reviewed April 8, 2024, revealed that all staff were to practice proper hand hygiene and glove use. Dining Services staff were responsible for food preparation procedures and using serving utensils appropriately to prevent cross contamination. Observation of the tray line service on November 13, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., revealed the following: Dietary Employee 1 (DE 1) was wearing gloves and operating the tray line. DE 1 grabbed a smothered chicken breast without a serving utensil. DE 1 then walked away from the tray line to open a bag of hot dog buns, she then opened and closed a drawer of utensils, and wiped food substance off her apron without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene between each task. DE 1 then placed a small metal container of food from the steam table directly top of the cooked meat. CFR 483.60(i) Food Safety Requirement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive care plan and/or interventions that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for three of 27 sampled residents. (Resident's 15, 17, 21) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 15 had diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of prostate and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the current care plan revealed Resident 15 was at risk for skin breakdown with an intervention for staff to apply Geri-Sleeves (sleeves to protect skin from damage caused by friction and shearing) to bilateral arms in the morning and remove during provision of care. Multiple observations on November 12, 13, and 14, 2024, between 9:30 a.m. and 1:45 p.m., revealed Resident 15 sitting in a wheelchair, in the day room, shirt sleeves pushed up, and Geri-Sleeves not applied. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 17 was admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility documentation, resident interview, results of a test tray, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature in the main dining room. Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Dining Service Operations: Test Trays, last reviewed April 8, 2024, revealed that food would be palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Review of Dining Council Minutes from September 30, 2024, and October 6 and 14, 2024, revealed that residents had stated that their food gets served cold and was not palatable. In a group interview on November 13, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., Residents 54 and 62 reported that food served in the main dining room was often served cold and not palatable. Results of a test tray audit conducted on November 13, 2024, at 11:33 a.m., after the last resident meal tray was served in the main dining room from the main kitchen, revealed a smothered chicken breast was served at a temperature of 110.0 degrees Fahrenheit, mashed potatoes at 115.1 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department and on one of four nursing units. (Cherry Tree Lane) Findings include: Observations during the kitchen tour on December 5, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., revealed that inside the Ice Cream Freezer, there were multiple areas of dried food debris on the wall and on the bottom. There was a leaf on the bottom of the freezer. There were two utensil drawers containing clean utensils. One drawer had a food scoop with dried food debris in it. The other drawer had dried food debris in it. When that drawer was open, there was long strand of hair sticking out from the inside track of the drawer, close to the clean utensils. On the pot and pan rack, there was a long strand of hair where the clean items were stored. Review of the facility's policy entitled, Safe Handling for Foods from Visitors, last reviewed April 24, 2023, revealed when food was brought into the facility for the residents by visitors that staff should label foods with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA