Sinking Spring Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 158 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 34.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 214 beds and averages 192.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from physical and mental abuse for one of seven sampled residents. (Resident 1) This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation.Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed April 17, 2025, revealed that the facility prohibited abuse, mistreatment, and neglect for all residents. The policy further defined abuse as willful infliction, meaning the individual acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Review of the facility policy entitled, Treatment: Considerate and Respectful, reviewed, February 21, 2025, revealed that residents were to be groomed as they wished to be groomed, which included maintaining the resident's personal preference regarding hair style and length. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that respected each resident's dignity and preferences to promote quality of life, resulting in psychosocial harm for one of seven sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Treatment: Considerate and Respectful, reviewed February 21, 2025, revealed that residents were to be groomed as they wished to be groomed, which included maintaining the resident's personal preference regarding hair style and length. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, a periodic evaluation of resident care needs) dated November 6, 2025, revealed the resident was alert and oriented, reported feeling down, depressed or hopeless several days per week, and was dependent on staff for assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident 1's care plan revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from mental and/or physical abuse for two residents (Residents 1 and 2), which resulted in psychosocial harm for one of seven residents reviewed. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed February 21, 2025, revealed that instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It included a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side), anxiety, depression, and heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a periodic assessment of resident care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders were implemented for one of seven sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated February 12, 2026, revealed that medications were to be administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber and that medications to be given at bedtime were to be scheduled for administration up to one hour prior to the resident's scheduled bedtime. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Hodgkin's lymphoma (cancer of the lymph nodes) and anxiety. A physician's order, dated October 27, 2025, directed staff to administer lorazepam tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg), three tablets at bedtime. Review of nursing progress notes and the Individual Patient Narcotic Dispensing Record (a record kept to keep count of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of seven sampled residents. (Resident 1)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. According to the Minimum Data Set assessment (a periodic evaluation of resident care needs), dated November 6, 2025, the resident was alert and oriented, reported feeling down, depressed or hopeless several days per week, and was dependent on staff for assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident 1's care plan revealed that she often refused care due to her personal preference and staff was to postpone the activity if refused. In an interview on January 8, 2026, at 10:20 a.m., Resident 1 stated that staff cut her hair and took her for a shower, even though she refused. In an interview on January 8, 2026, at 12:14 p.m., the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen.Findings include:Observation during the environmental tour on September 23, 2025, at 10:10 a.m. revealed a black substance on ceiling tiles in the kitchen around the exhaust vents. Several ceiling tiles were missing, and a central air vent was dripping water onto the floor.CFR 483.60(i) Food Safety RequirementPreviously cited 8/27/2428 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code 201.18(e)(2.1) Management.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene for three of 37 sampled residents. (Residents 9, 10, 11)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 9 had diagnoses that included cerebral palsy and a seizure disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Resident 9 required maximum assistance with hygiene and self care and had no cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan dated July 22, 2025, revealed that staff were to assist the resident with hygiene and self care, including nail care on bath day and as necessary. On September 23, 2025, at 2:58 p.m., the resident was observed in his room. His nails were long and dirty. He stated that he preferred short nails and that staff had not offered to provide nail care recently. On September 25, 2025, at 10:49 a.m., the resident was observed in bed. His nails remained long. He stated that staff had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff on one of four toured nursing units. (Station 2) Findings include:Observations on September 23, 2025, from 9:45 a.m. through 1:00 p.m. and on September 24, 2025, from 9:00 a.m. through 1:00 p.m. revealed the following:Peeling wallpaper was observed on all four walls in the Chapel.The wall to the left of the door was damaged in room [ROOM NUMBER].The wall behind the bathroom sink and toilet, and linoleum below the sink were damaged in room [ROOM NUMBER].In an interview on September 25, 2025, at 1:11 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that the environmental problems should have been addressed.28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code 201.18 (b) (1) Management.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident fund accounts, clinical record, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to convey resident funds and provide a final accounting of funds within 30 days of death to the individual/probate jurisdiction for the resident's estate for one of four residents (Resident 1). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's account managed by the facility revealed that the account was closed on [DATE], with a balance of $2,961.70. There was no documented evidence that the facility provided a final accounting to the individual/probate jurisdiction for the resident's estate within 30 days of the resident's death. On [DATE], a check was made out to the Social Security Administration and not Resident 1's estate. In an interview on [DATE], at 1:30 p.m. the Administrator confirmed that there was no evidence that the facility provided a final accounting to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for one of seven sampled residents. (Resident 1) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed February 21, 2025, revealed that the Administrator or designee would report allegations of abuse to the appropriate state and local authority within two hours. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 (R1) had diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis on one side), anxiety, depression, and heart disease. Review of a grievance form dated March 17, 2025, revealed that in the morning during the day shift (7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.), R1 reported to staff that Resident 2 (R2) had been sexually harassing him by making threats if he didn't provide food and money and would hit his arm. Additional documentation indicated that on the same day and shift, R1 reported to the psychologist that R2 had been threatening and sexually harassing him with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess wounds or implement interventions to prevent new or worsened pressure ulcers for two of five sampled residents with wounds. (Residents 1 and 3) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Skin Integrity and Wound Management, last reviewed October 15, 2024, revealed that staff was to assess and document wound status weekly. The nursing assistant would observe skin daily and report any changes or concerns to the nurse. The licensed nurse would perform daily monitoring of wounds or dressings for the presence of complications or decline. Documentation was to include daily monitoring of the ulcer/wound site with or without a dressing, status of the dressing, status of the tissue surrounding the dressing, adequate control of wound associated pain, and signs of decline in wound status. Pressure injury prevention was to be implemented for identified, modifiable risk factors. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with dining in a manner that promoted and maintained dignity for one resident on one of five nursing units. (Station 2, Resident 87) In addition, the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was answered in a timely manner for one of 35 sampled residents. (Resident 112) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 87 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated August 14, 2024, revealed that the resident had cognitive impairment and needed staff assistance with eating. Review of Resident 87's care plan revealed that staff was to provide total assistance with feeding, feed the resident slowly, and provide verbal cueing with meals. On August 25, 2024, from 12:16 p.m. through 12:35 p.m., nurse aide (NA) 1 was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on three of five nursing units. (Medbridge, Station 2, and Arcadia) Findings include: Observations during the environmental tour on the Medbridge unit on August 25, 2024, at 12:30 p.m., revealed that in room [ROOM NUMBER], there was a large brown stain in the bathoom sink. There was also a black substance around and inside of the drain plug in the bathroom sink. Observation on August 25 and 26, 2024, in the morning and in the early afternoon at various times, revealed that there was a box outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] that contained a new toilet. In addition, observation on August 26, 2024, at 10:00 a.m, revealed there were two large garbage cans outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] that were uncovered. The one can was overflowing with trash. The box with the new toilet in it, and the two large garbage cans were cluttering this area near the nursing station and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observations during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,342 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $17,342 — penalty dated 2025-03-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA