No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wallingford Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Cen

115 South Providence Road, Wallingford, PA 19086 · For profit - Corporation · 193 certified beds · (610) 565-3232 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$282,733 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $282,733 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-24)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
101 Chesley Dr · (484) 621-0082 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
627 S Chester Rd · (833) 338-0966 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
730 S Chester Rd · (610) 543-8814 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3 Kelly Ln · (267) 601-6848 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased31.3%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.8%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.5%17.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.8%20.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.9%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.0%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table28.7%17.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine31.1%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.6%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.631.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.181.181.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.1%CMS range 32.7–53.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.1%CMS range 10.1–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified83.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 3.9–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
62.8%
Total nursing turnover
55.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 193 beds and averages 173.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-12)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and procedure review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess and identify a newly admitted resident as a fall risk and develop interventions to prevent falls causing actual harm to Resident 263 who fell causing injuries that required hospitalization for one of 3 residents reviewed (Resident 263) Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Assessment: Nursing last revised March 2022, revealed A nursing assessment will be performed by a licensed nurse for all patients within 24 hours of admission. Routine and focused assessments will be performed on an ongoing basis as needed. Assessments will be reviewed and certified as completed by an RN within 24 hours and all individuals who complete a portion of the assessment will sign and certify to the accuracy of the portion of the assessment, he/she completed. Review of Resident 263's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse by Resident 88 who previously demonstrated physical aggression towards other residents, which resulted in harm requiring emergency medical treatment of Resident 141. The facility failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for 42 additional residents (Residents 15,18, 22, 23, 24, 29, 33, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 45, 47, 60, 65, 66, 73, 75, 76, 77, 81, 89, 94, 99, 105, 110, 112, 115, 119, 120, 121, 127, 131, 135, 138, 139, 141, 146, 150, 154, and Resident 157) who resided on the same unit as Resident 88. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition with revision date of October 24, 2022 revealed in section 6.3 If the suspected abuse is patient-to-patient, the patient who has in any way threatened or attacked another will be removed from the setting or situation, and an investigation will be completed. Further review of facility policy revealed in subsection 6.3.1 the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility policy review, clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate and safe supervision for a resident who demonstrated physical aggression, which resulted in harm to Resident 141 as evidenced by laceration to the forehead requiring emergency hospital treatment. The facility failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for 42 additional residents (Residents 15,18, 22, 23, 24, 29, 33, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 45, 47, 60, 65, 66, 73, 75, 76, 77, 81, 89, 94, 99, 105, 110, 112, 115, 119, 120, 121, 127, 131, 135, 138, 139, 141, 146, 150, 154, and Resident 157) who resided on the same unit as Resident 88. The facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent falls for two residents (Residents 67 and 68) reviewed resulting in actual harm to Resident 68 who sustained a fracture. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition with revision date of October 24, 2022 revealed in section 6.3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the wound care physician's order for one of two residents reviewed (Resident CL1). Findings: A review of Resident CL1's wound physician's notes dated January 15, 2026, revealed residents had a right heel DTI (Tissue Pressure Injury- Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration) measuring 2.5 x 3.5 cm (centimeters), and a left heel DTI measuring 2.5 x 2.3 cm. An order was made to cleanse both heels with soap and water, apply skin prep, and leave them open to air daily. A review of Resident CL1's January 2026 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that the skin prep order for both heels was followed. A review of Resident CL1's wound physician's notes dated January 22, 2026, revealed that the right heel DTI had worsened with a measurement of 3.7 x 6.0 cm. The left-heel DTI had a measurement of 0.3 x 0.3 cm. A new wound treatment was made to apply Betadine (brownish solution used to prevent infections)-soaked gauze to the right heel and cover with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make sure that medical supplies and medications were properly stored and/or disposed of in two of two medication rooms (Two South and Two North) and two of four medication carts (Two South Long Hall and Two South Short Hall). Review the facility policy, Storage of Medications dated, indicated, Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration. Outdated, contaminated, discontinued or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy, if a current order exists. Review of the U.S. FDA approved prescribing information for Lantus (a type of insulin, an injectable medication to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility documents, policy review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly restrain hair and failed to properly store food items to prevent possible cross-contamination in the Main Kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility dietary policy, Personal Hygiene dated 5/1/25, indicated Hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings, or nets are worn to effectively keep hair from contacting exposed food. Facial hair coverings are used to cover all facial hair. Review of the facility policy, Refrigerated/Frozen Storage dated 5/21/25, indicated that food stored under refrigeration/freezer storage is maintained in a safe and sanitary manner. All foods are labeled with the name of product and the date received and use by date once opened. Prepared foods are labeled and dated with the name of the product, date opened, and use by date. During an observation of the Main kitchen on 7/31/25, at approximately 4:05 p.m., the following was observed: Dietary Employee E5 admitted the surveyor to the kitchen. When the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to document grievance resolutions for four of six residents (Resident R4, R5, R6, and R7). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Grievances/Concern dated 1/8/25, stated The Administrator will serve as the Grievance Officer who is responsible for overseeing the grievance process, including Civil Rights grievances/concerns, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion, leading any necessary investigations by the facility, maintaining the confidentiality of all information associated with grievances, for example, the identity of the patient for those grievances submitted anonymously, issuing written grievance decisions to the patient. Review of facility grievance forms revealed that the form section titled Resolution of Grievance/Concern included areas to document the following:If the grievance was resolved.Date of resolution.Date that written resolution was provided, if necessary.Method used to notify resident or representative of grievance resolution, if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of state laws, facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to report allegations of neglect for failing to implement policies and procedures to report allegations of abuse and/or neglect for six of ten residents (Resident R4, R5, R7, R8, R9, and R10). Findings include: Review of the Older Adult Protective Services Act of 11/6/87, amended by Act 1997-13, Chapter 7, Section 701, requires any employee or administrator of a facility who suspects abuse is mandated to report the abuse. All reports of abuse should be reported to the local area agency on aging and licensing agencies. Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prohibition dated 5/21/25, indicated that immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment, or neglect, the facility will perform the following. -Report allegations to the appropriate state and local authority(s) involving neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of state laws, facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to fully investigate allegations of neglect for four of six residents (Resident R4, R5, R8, and R9).Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prohibition dated 5/21/25, defined indicated the facility will Initiate an investigation within 24 hours of an allegation of abuse that focuses on:- whether abuse or neglect occurred and to what extent;- clinical examination for signs of injuries, if indicated;- causative factors; and- interventions to prevent further injury. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual effective October 2024, indicated that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a screening test that aides in detecting cognitive impairment. The BIMS total score suggests the following distributions: 13-15: cognitively intact8-12: moderately impaired0-7: severe impairment Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R4 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy, observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of pest control documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program on two of four nursing units (One North and Two South nursing units). Findings include: Review of the facility preventive maintenance policy, Infection Control Practices dated 5/21/25, indicated the facility will provide a pest free environment. During an interview on 7/31/25, at approximately at approximately 1:30 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed that there had been a bat in the facility, but it had been disposed of by staff. During an interview on 8/1/25, at approximately 11:54 a.m., Resident R11 stated that she had seen mice in her room. During an observation on 8/1/25, at approximately 11:58 a.m., of Resident R12, R13, and R14's room, fruit flies were observed. During an interview on 8/1/25, at approximately 12:00 p.m., Resident R18 stated that he has seen mice in his room. During an interview on 8/1/25, at approximately 12:04 p.m., Resident R16 stated that she has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to protect residents from abuse for one of six residents (Resident R10).Review of the facility policy, Abuse Prohibition dated 5/21/25, defined verbal abuse as any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to patients or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include but are not limited to: threats of harm; saying things to frighten a patient, such as telling a patient that they will never be able to see their family again. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], included diagnoses of schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech and behavior), autism disorder, and excoriation (skin-picking) disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain the required dental services for three of five residents. (Resident R1, R2, and R3)Findings include: Review of the facility policy, titled Dental Services dated May 21, 2025, revealed the facility will provide, or obtain from an outside resource, routine and emergency dental services to meet the needs of each patient. Review of the clinical record indicated that Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated June 4, 2025, included diagnoses of Anemia (too little iron in the body causing fatigue) and Dementia (group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Review of Section L: Oral/Dental Status revealed Resident R1 had experienced, Mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty with chewing within the lookback period (5/28/25 through 6/4/25). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Findings include: Review the facility policy, Storage of Medications dated, indicated, Medications should be stored so that various routes of administration are separated. Internally administered medications are stored separately from medications used extremally such as lotions, creams, ointments, and suppositories. During an observation on 7/31/25, at approximately 5:37 p.m., the treatment cart stored in the Two North Medication room was observed. Upon opening the top drawer, it was noted that the treatment supplies were placed haphazardly in the drawer, with no separation of medications/biologicals based on resident or route of administration. A partial list of what was noted in the cart:Santyl ointmentsCollagenase ointmentsZinc oxide paste.Voltaren cream.Multiple types of gauze and dressing suppliesWound measuring tools.Anti-dandruff shampoo.Medi-honey.Antifungal sprays.Prescription antifungal powder.Multiple rolls of tape.Iodosorb.Vashe wound cleanser.A non-functional thermometer.A watch. Disposable shavers. Upon opening the second drawer, it was noted that the treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-21 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and interviews with residents and staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain personal dignity for two of six residents observed (Resident R1, R2) Findings Include: Facility policy titled Residents Rights Under Federal Law , revised 2023, revealed the facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. Clinical record revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included fracture of upper end of left humerus, schizophrenia (mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave), and muscle weakness. Review of Resident R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs), dated June 06, 2025, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of select facility policies and procedures, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for four out of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 11, Resident 59, Resident 64, and Resident 164). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revision date January 8, 2024, states Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) is based on the Centers of Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) guidance, Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use in nursing homes to prevent spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted [DATE], with an admitting diagnosis of sepsis (occurs when your immune system has a dangerous reaction to an infection, resulting in tissue damage and organ failure). Additional review of Resident 11's clinical record revealed an active order for indwelling foley catheter due to:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's policy, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight change for one of the 35 residents reviewed (Resident 114). Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Weights and Heights, last revised on February 1, 2023, revealed, that if the body weight is not expected, re-weigh the patient. A significant weight change is defined as 5% in one month and 10% in six months. Significant weight changes will be reviewed by the licensed nurse for assessment. The physician and Dietitian will be notified, and notification of the physician and Dietitian will be documented in the Weight Change Progress Note. Clinical records review revealed Resident 114 had a diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other organs). A review of Resident 114's weights and vitals revealed a weight of 131.2 pounds on November 4, 2024, and 150.2 pounds on December 5, 2024, a 19 pounds (14.48%)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and employee interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 19). Findings include: Review of Resident 19's physician's orders revealed an order dated October 3, 2023, for oxygen 2 liters via nasal cannula (tubing that wraps around the ears that supplies oxygen via the nose). Further review of Resident 19's physician's orders revealed an order dated March 7, 2024, to maintain ear protectors on oxygen tubing at all times. Review of Resident 19's Treatment Administration Records revealed staff were signing off that the ear protectors were maintained on the oxygen tubing. Review of Resident 19's progress notes revealed a practitioner note dated August 28, 2024, which stated: this is [an acute] visit per nurse request. Patient has [significant] redness and swelling behind left ear. Patient has oxygen and per nurse she injures area with oxygen tubing. The practitioner prescribed doxycycline (antibiotic) 100 milligrams twice daily for seven days, hydrocortisone cream…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical records review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance was provided to prevent a fall for one of the 35 residents reviewed (Resident 156). Findings include: A review of Resident 156's diagnosis list includes cerebral infarction (a condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked, resulting in brain tissue death), contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, and ligaments that prevents normal movement of a joint or body part), falls, and intellectual disabilities. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- A standardized assessment tool that measures health status in long-term care residents) dated November 8, 2025, revealed Resident 156 had a moderate cognitive impairment. The same MDS revealed that the resident had impairment to one side of the upper and lower extremities. The resident was dependent on toileting and personal hygiene. State MDS dated [DATE], revealed that the resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility procedure, observation, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide documented evidence that consistent, adequate catheter care was provided to one of five residents reviewed for catheters (Resident 167). Findings include: Review of facility procedure, Catheter: Indwelling Urinary - Care of, last revised February 1, 2023, revealed that catheter care is to be performed twice daily and as needed, and the catheter care is to be documented in the clinical record. Observation of Resident 167 on December 10, 2024, at approximately 9:00 a.m. revealed the resident had a Foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube placed in the bladder through the urethra to drain urine). Review of Resident 167's physician's orders, Medication Administrator Records, Treatment Administration Record, and care plan failed to reveal evidence that the resident was receiving routine catheter care. The above findings were discussed and confirmed with the Nursing Home Administrator on December 12, 2024, at approximately 9:50 a.m. 28 Pa Code 211.12(d)(5)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility procedure and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately monitor and address significant weight loss in one of nine residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 130). Findings include: Review of facility procedure Weights and Heights, last revised February 1, 2023, revealed: If the body weight is not as expected, re-weigh the patient. The policy further stated: Significant weight changes will be reviewed by the licensed nurse for assessment. The licensed nurse would then notify the provider and dietitian of significant weight changes, document notification, and notify the physician of recommendations made by the dietitian. Review of Resident 130's weights revealed on September 6, 2024, the resident was documented as weighing 131.5 pounds (lbs.) On October 3, 2024, the resident was documented as weighing 123.8 lbs., a 5.86% loss in one month. The next documented weight in Resident 130's clinical record was not obtained until November 8. 2024, where the resident was documented as weighing 117.4 lbs., a 5.45% loss in one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medication to treat Diabetes (A group of metabolic disorders characterized by a high blood sugar level over a prolonged period of time) was made available for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident 13). Findings include: A review of Resident 13's physician order dated August 28, 2024, revealed an order for Trulicity (A medication used to help lower blood sugar levels in people with type 2 diabetes) 4.5mg/0.5ml Inject 4.5 mg subcutaneously one time a day every Wednesday for Diabetes. A review of the October and November 2024, Medication Administration Record revealed Trulicity was not administered on October 9, 30, and November 13, 2024. Nursing progress notes dated October 9, 2024, October 30, 2024, and November 13, 2024, all indicated medication Trulicity (not administered), pharmacy notified. A review of the laboratory report dated April 10, 2024, revealed an HbA1c (A hemoglobin A1C test is a blood test that shows what your average blood sugar level was over the past two to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a consistent non-pharmacological intervention (NPI) and failed to provide an appropriate indication for the use of as-needed psychotropic medication for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 164). Findings include: A review of Resident 164's physician's order dated October 21, 2024, revealed an order for Lorazepam (A medication used to treat Anxiety) 0.5 mg one tablet two times daily. An order for Lorazepam 0.5 mg one tablet by mouth every six hours PRN (as needed) for Anxiety was also made on the same day. A review of the December 2024, Medication Administration Record revealed that from [DATE], until December 12, 2024, aside from the schedule two times daily Lorazepam order, Resident 164 was administered with PRN Lorazepam order six times in 12 days. Clinical records review revealed that from December 1, 2024, until December 12, 2024, Resident 164 was administered with PRN Lorazepam four times with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility's policy, observations, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled for one of the two units observed (1 North). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage undated, revealed medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturers' or provider pharmacy recommendations to keep their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration. The provider pharmacy dispenses medications in containers that meet state and federal labeling requirements. Medications are to remain in these containers and stored in a controlled environment. An observation on the 1 North short hall med cart was conducted on December 10, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., with the presence of licensed Employee E6. Observation of the top drawer of the medication cart revealed the following: five white tablets in a medication cup; 12 loose Allegra tablets (A medication used to treat allergies) tablets; and five loose Famotidine tablets (A medication used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medication irregularities were acted upon by a physician for four of five residents reviewed (Resident 16, 29, 77, and 137). Findings include: Review of Resident 16's Consultation Report for the Medication Regimen Review completed on September 1, 2023, revealed a recommendation to consider a trial dose reduction of Aripiprazole (anti-psychotic medication) to 2 mg at night. Review of Resident 16's clinical record failed to reveal that the above recommendation was addressed by the physician. Interview with the Director of Nursing on June 25, 2024, at 1:00 p.m., confirmed that the pharmacy recommendation made on September 1, 2024, was not addressed by the physician. Review of Resident 29's Consultation Report for the Medication Regimen Review completed on February 1, 2024, revealed a recommendation for a dose reduction evaluation for the medications Clonazepam (Anti-anxiety medication), Haloperidol (Anti-psychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications by attempted dosage reductions and periodical reevaluation of psychotropic drug usage for three of five residents reviewed (Residents 16, 29, and 137). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated December 1, 2007, revealed the facility should ensure that the ordering physician reviews the medication plan and considers a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of psychotropic medications to find the lowest effective dose unless a GDR is clinically contraindicated. The physician should document the clinical rationale for why any additional attempted dose reduction at that time would be likely to impair the resident's function or increase distressed behavior. Review of Resident 16's physician order dated September 1, 2023, revealed an order for Aripiprazole (anti-psychotic medication) 5 mg (milligram) given by mouth at bedtime for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on job description reviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility of ensuring that the beverage temperature policy/guidelines included parameters identifying safe beverage temperatures for hot liquids and failed to protect residents from potentially suffering a medical emergency related to hot beverage burns. Findings include: Review of the Nursing Home Administrator's (NHA) job description includes the following responsibilities: Managing all business-related activity to achieve the facility's vision and supporting strategies and assures ethical and high-quality provider of health services is maintained; Knowing and respecting resident rights; Safety-follows established safety policies, ensures potential safety/health hazards are eliminated, and demonstrate job-specific knowledge of disaster procedures; Staff development-participates in QAA program communicates new policy and regulations to staff to ensure compliance; Administration Provision and Services Responsibilities-drives quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the clinical records review interview with staff and physician, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of an abnormal blood result for one of the three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: A review of Resident 1's physician order dated July 31, 2024, revealed an order for Coumadin 5 mg one tablet one time a day on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday for A-Fib (Irregular heartbeat). Clinical records review revealed a blood work for INR (International Normalized Ratio- A standardized measurement of prothrombin time, which is the test that measures how long it takes blood to clot. An INR for healthy people is between 0.8 and 1.2.) was done on August 13, 2024t, with a result of 4.1 indicating a critical high result. The laboratory result revealed that the result was reported on August 13, 2024. Clinical records review failed to reveal that the physician was notified of the critical high INR result. A review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record revealed that the resident was administered with Coumadin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy and procedure, clinical record, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 264) Findings include: Review of Facility policy and procedure titled Accidents/Incidents, last revised on March 1, 2024 revealed, When conducting an investigation the Administrator, DON, or designee will make every effort to ascertain the cause of the accident/incident .Conduct witness interviews from all staff and visitors who may have knowledge of the accident/incident. Review of Resident 264 progress notes revealed a nursing entry dated February 21, 2024 at 1:44 p.m. stating, during rounds resident grimacing and moaning when left lower extremity moved, resident have limited to no movement of left leg, NP (Nurse Practitioner) seen and examined and resident with new order for stat (immediate) x-ray of the left hip, pelvis, and femur and knee. Further review of Resident 264 progress notes revealed a nursing entry on February 21, 2024 at 4:48 p.m. stating x-ray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medication ordered by the physician was followed for one of the 33 residents reviewed (Resident 70). Findings include: Review of Resident 70's diagnosis list includes Chronic Kidney Failure and Dependence on Hemodialysis (A process of purifying the blood of a person whose kidneys are not working normally). Review of Resident 70's clinical record revealed the resident goes for dialysis services every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday at 10:00 a.m. Review of the Resident 70's blood work dated June 4, 2024, revealed a Phosphorus level of 6.8 mg/dl (normal range 2.5- 4.5) Review of Resident 70's physician's orders dated June 2, 2024, and June 13, 2024, revealed an order for Calcium Acetate (Phosphate binder) 667 mg one tablet by mouth with meals for elevated phosphorus. The medication was scheduled for 8:30 a.m., 12:30 p.m., and 5:00 p.m. Review of Resident 70's medication administration record revealed that the medication was not administered on June 4, 6, 15, 18, and 20, 2024, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and address significant weight changes in a timely manner for two of six residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents 54 and 60). Findings include: Review of Resident 54's weights revealed the resident had not been weighed since April 24, 2024. Review of Resident 54's progress notes revealed a dietitian entry dated May 20, 2024 stating No updated weight this month. Rt refused to be weighed Attempted to get weight again today but sit to stand scale is broken. Review of Resident 54's clinical record revealed there was no other documentation of resident refusing to be weighed and there was no care plan developed for the resident related to refusals. Interview with the Director of Nursing confirmed Resident 54 had not been weighed since April 24, 2024 and there was no other documented evidence Resident 54 had refused weights. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on June 24, 2024 at 1:15 p.m. revealed the maintenance director had inspected the scale used for Resident 54 and it was in working…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide enteral nutrition (feeding delivered through a feeding tube) as ordered by the physician for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident 54) Findings include: Review of Resident 54's clinical record revealed the resident returned from the hospital on February 28, 2024 with a PEG tube (feeding tube- tube surgically inserted into the stomach when oral intake is not adequate). Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated April 24, 2024 for Jevity 1.5 (tube feeding) running at 65 ml per hour starting at 5 p.m. and ending at 9 a.m. for a total of 1040 ml per day. Review of resident 54's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the months of April, May and June 2024 revealed there were no days where it was documented the resident received a total of 1040 ml per day as ordered by the physician. Interview with the Director of Nursing on June 24, 2024 at 11:15 a.m. confirmed there was no documented evidence Resident 54 had received the amount of tube feeding as ordered by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure non-pharmalogical interventions (NPIs) were attempted prior to the administration of as-needed narcotic pain medication for one of thirty-three residents reviewed (Resident 98). Findings include: Review of Resident 98's physician's orders revealed an order dated October 25, 2023, for oxycodone (narcotic pain reliever) 5 milligrams (mg) give every 4 hours as needed, and document all NPIs prior to administering the medication. Review of Resident 98's April 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident received as-needed oxycodone 5 mg a total of 21 times. Review of Resident 98's May 2024 MAR revealed the resident received as-needed oxycodone 5 mg a total of 20 times. Review of Resident 98's June 2024 revealed the resident received as-needed oxycodone 5 mg a total of 26 times as of June 21, 2024. Further review of Resident 98's April 2024, May 2024, and June 2024 MARs and progress notes failed to reveal NPIs were documented prior to administering the resident's oxycodone 5mg.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform laboratory services for one of the 33 residents reviewed (Resident 29). Findings include: Review of Resident 29's clinical records revealed Resident 29 had a diagnosis of Epilepsy (disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures). Review of Resident 29's physician order dated August 26, 2022, revealed an order for Depakote 750 mg in the morning and 500 mg at bedtime. Review of Resident 29's physician's notes dated April 29, 2024, at 9:30 a.m., revealed Today's order: TSH, CBC, CMP, and Depakote level for May 1, 2024. Review of Resident 29's physician's notes dated May 22, 2023, at 3:49 p.m., revealed the Depakote level was ordered but not completed on May 1, 2024, then reorder for May 2023. Clinical records review failed to reveal that Depakote level was completed on May 1, 2024, and/or May 23, 2024. An interview conducted with the Director of Nursing on June 24, 2024, at 1:00 p.m., confirmed Depakote level was not completed until June 22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the radiological diagnostic studies were done in a timely manner for one of thirty-three residents reviewed (Resident 101). Findings include: Review of Resident 101's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated April 2, 2024, which stated: Resident return from schedule [doctor] appointment. Per [doctor] recommendation to check vitamin D level, increased vitamin D to 2000, Calcium 600 mg, Prolia [(medication used to treat bone loss)] injection [every] six months. Next office visit May 2024 for Dexa scan [(low-dose x-ray that measures bone density and risk for osteoporosis and fractures.)] Further review of Resident 101's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated May 20, 2024, which stated: Resident was supposed to go out on appointment this afternoon, transport did not show- up. Further review of Resident 101's progress notes revealed a late entry nurse's note effective date May 20, 2024, which stated: Resident was scheduled for a dexascan today. The order was placed for stretcher transport,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy and facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one of three residents reviewed was free from abuse (Resident CL1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed [DATE], revealed that Centers prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident/patient property, and exploitation for all patients. Review of Resident CL1's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of lung cancer with metastasis to the brain and expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident CL1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - periodic assessment of resident care needs) dated [DATE], revealed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident CL1's roommate's clinical record, Resident CL2, revealed a comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], with a BIMS score of 15, indicating that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that [NAME] Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center failed to ensure that residents were assessed and monitored to prevent pressure ulcers for one of one residents reviewed (Resident R72). Findings include: Review of Resident R72's clinical record revealed resident was admitted on [DATE]. Further review of clinical record revealed Resident 72's diagnoses include; Diabetes Mellitus (failure of the body to produce insulin to enable sugar to pass from the blood stream to cells for nourishment), Vascular Dementia (lack of blood carrying oxygen and nutrient to a part of the brain, causing problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, and memory); Malnutrition; and Abnormalities of gait. Review of Resident R72's clinical record revealed most recent Braden Scale (assessment of risk of developing pressure ulcers) dated June 15, 2023 which indicated resident was considered High Risk to develop pressure ulcer/wound. Review of Resident R72's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set assessments for five of 24 residents reviewed. (Residents 4, 72, 78, 85, 92,) Findings Include: Review of Resident 4's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of resident needs) dated June 6, 2023 revealed sections C Cognitive Patterns and D Mood were all dashed indicating they were not completed at the time of submission of the MDS. Review of Resident 72's Modification of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of resident needs) dated May 11, 2023 revealed sections C Cognitive Patterns and D Mood were all dashed indicating they were not completed at the time of submission of the MDS. Review of Resident 78's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of resident needs) dated July 20, 2023 revealed sections C Cognitive Patterns and D Mood were all dashed indicating they were not completed at the time of submission of the MDS. Review of Resident 85's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon review of facility policy and procedure and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for the administration of medication for two of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 69 and Resident 142). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, revised January 1, 2022, revealed Facility staff should comply with Facility policy, Applicable Law and the State Operations Manual when administering medications. Further review of the facility policy revealed Facility staff should verify that the medication name and dose are correct when compared to the medication order on the medication administration record. Further review of the facility policy revealed Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident, as set forth in facility's medication administration schedule. Clinical records review revealed Resident 69's diagnosis list includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to have a consultant pharmacist provided a monthly medication review or a physician respond to the recommendations made by the pharmacist during the monthly medications review for five of 5 residents reviewed (30, 33, 35, 68, 92) Findings include: Review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed diagnoses including but not limited to Vascular Dementia with psychosis (Memory loss with loss of reality in higher brain functions) Review of Resident 30's clinical record revealed a physician's orders for various medications including antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, opioids, antidepressant, and antianxiety medications. Review of Resident 30's pharmacy monthly consultation report dated February 22, 2023, and July 4, 2023, revealed that irregularities were found by the pharmacist, but the irregularities were not documented. Interview with the DON on August 3, 2023, at 11AM confirmed that pharmacy irregularity reports were not received by the facility and was therefore not provided to the attending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, a review of medication manufacturer's guidelines, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled and stored in two of six medication carts observed (1 North long hall and 1 North short hall medication cart). Findings include: Review of the manufacturer's storage guidelines for Insulin Lispro (Humalog-fast-acting insulin), revealed that the medication must be stored at room temperature and must be discarded within 28 days after opening. Review of manufacturers' storage guidelines for Insulin Gargline (long-acting insulin) revealed that the medication may be stored at room temperature and must be discarded within 28 days after opening. Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for Basaglar Insulin Kwikpen (a long-acting insulin) revealed that the medicine should be discarded 28 days after opening or removal from refrigeration. Review of the manufacturer's storage guidelines for Levemir FlexTouch (long-acting insulin), revealed in-use Levemir insulin must be discarded 42 days after opening. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on job description reviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility by implementing monitoring, supervision, and effective safety measures to for a resident who demonstrated physical aggression, which resulted in harm to Resident 141 as evidenced by laceration needing emergency medical treatment. The Administration failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation for 42 additional residents who resided on the same unit as Resident 88. Findings include: Review of the Nursing Home Administrator's (NHA) job description includes the following responsibilities: Managing all business-related activity to achieve the facility's vision and supporting strategies and assures ethical and high-quality provider of health services is maintained; Knowing and respecting resident rights; Safety-follows established safety policies, ensures potential safety/health hazards are eliminated, and demonstrate job-specific knowledge of disaster procedures; Staff development-participates in QAA program communicates new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the dignity of resident for two of 24 resident reviewed. (Residents 68 and 78) Findings Include: Review of resident 68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- periodic assessment of resident needs), dated July 5, 2023 revealed the resident had cognitive impairment. Observation of resident 68's room on July 31, 2023 at 9:45 a.m. and August 1, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. revealed a sign on the wall above the bed with instructions on how to use the resident's palm guard, ensure items are within resident's reach, and provide a scoop dish and handled mug at each meal. The sign was dated June 2023 and was signed by an occupational therapist. Review of Resident 78's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had cognitive impairment. Observation of resident 68's room on July 31, 2023 at 9:45 a.m. and August 1, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. revealed a sign on the outside of the door and observable from the hallway with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was initiated for a resident receiving hospice services for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: Review of Resident 4's clinical record revealed an order for hospice (end of life care) dated June 5, 2023. Review of Resident 4's care plan failed to reveal evidence of a care plan related to hospice or end of life care. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 3, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. confirmed there was no care plan addressing Resident 4's hospice needs. 28 Pa. Code 211.11(a)(b)(c)(d) Resident care plan

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon review of facility documentation and clinical record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised and updated after falls and an episode of aggression for two of 31 residents reviewed.(Resident 88 and Resident 100). Findings include: Review of Resident 88's clinical record revealed an admission date of November 1, 2018, which includes, but is not limited to schizophrenia, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident 88's clinical record revealed that on May 30, 2023, the resident struck another resident with a cane causing a laceration to the scalp. Review of Residents 88's current plan of care failed to reveal a revised and updated interventions to address the aggression displayed on May 20, 2023. Review of Resident 100's diagnosis list revealed diagnoses including seizure disorder. Review of Resident 100's clinical record and facility documentation revealed Resident 100 had sustained falls on May 4, 2023, May 11, 2023, May 18, 2023, and July 31, 2023. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon review of facility policy and procedure, clinical record review, and interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain weights upon admission and failed to obtain weekly weights for nutrition maintenance for two of 31 residents reviewed. (Resident 68 and Resident 153). Findings include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Weights and Heights, revised June 15, 2022 revealed Patients are weighed upon admission and/or re-admission, then weekly for four weeks and monthly thereafter. Additional weights may be obtained at the discretion of the interdisciplinary care team. Hospital weight will not serve as admission or re-admission weight. Review of Resident 68's demographic sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 68's weights revealed the first weight was not obtained until May 18, 2023. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing on August 3, 2023 at 12:30 p.m. confirmed there was no admission weights and weekly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that the medications ordered were available and administered by the acceptable standards of care for one of the 31 residents reviewed (Resident 20). Findings include: Clinical records review revealed Resident 20's had a diagnosis of Chronic Pain Syndrome. Review of Resident 20's Physician's order sheet (POS) revealed an order for Oxycodone HCL (A medication to treat moderate to severe pain) 10mg tablet Give one tab every six hours for pain. Review of Resident 20's July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the Oxycodone was not administered on the following dates/times: July 9, 2023, at midnight, July 10, 2023, at noon, July 11, 2023, at 12:00 a.m., 6:00 a.m., and 12 noon, and July 12, 2023, at midnight. Resident 20 did not received her/his ordered Oxycodone medication six times on July 2023. Review of the nursing progress notes dated July 9, 2023, revealed that at midnight, the nurse called the pharmacy because Oxycodone 10mg was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an appropriate indication was present and non-drug interventions were attempted before administering an as-needed anti-anxiety medication for two of the 31 residents reviewed (Resident 35 and Resident 69). Findings include: Clinical record review revealed Resident 35's diagnosis list includes Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of Resident 35's physician's order revealed Xanax (anti-anxiety medication) 0.25 milligrams by mouth every six hours as needed for anxiety. Review of Resident 35's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident's behaviors and refusals should be documented every shift daily. Further review of Resident 35's MAR revealed that the resident's behaviors were only documented on the Medication Administration Record for three shifts from July 1,2023, until July 31, 2023. Interview with the Director of Nursing on August 3, 2023 at 11:00 a.m. confirmed that staff was not documenting the resident's behaviors because the system did not prompt them to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Based on observation of the first-floor pantry refrigerator and cabinets on August 1, 2023, at 9:23 a.m. it was determined that there were six unlabeled 4 oz milk cartons that expired on June 26, 2023. Additional observation of the refrigerator showed four peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, two open loaves of bread, a pizza box, a container of macaroni and cheese and four bags of take-out food all of which were unlabeled and undated. Further observation of the refrigerator showed and an open 16 oz ginger ale soda that was unlabeled. Observation of the facility's Food from Outside Sources policy stated that food must be labeled with the resident's name and date it was brought to the facility. The policy further states that the nursing and dietary department is assigned responsibility for monitoring the designated refrigerator and discarding outdated foods once a day. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview with staff and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records related to medications and treatments for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 35). Findings include: Review of facility policy Medication Pass Policy dated last revised June 14, 2017, revealed that After you have finished assisting with medication, it is very important that you immediately write in the MAR and record the following information: the vital signs if and required for the medication, your initials in the appropriate box, your name and title in the appropriate space, the resident refusal to take the medication if applicable. Clinical record review for Resident 35 revealed a physician's order for Paliperidone ER (antipsychotic medication used to treat Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective disorder) 3 milligrams every night at bedtime. Per the resident's notes dated July 15, 2023, the medication was on order. Per the resident's progress notes dated July 23, 2023, the medication was on order, progress notes for July 24, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-08-25 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman of resident transfers in writing for four of five residents reviewed Resident (69, 100, 127, and 412) Findings include: A review of Resident 69's nursing progress notes dated July 7, 2023, at 5:54 a.m., revealed resident was transferred and admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection. A written letter with the required content was not provided to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman after transfer to the acute care facility occurred. Review of Resident 100's clinical record revealed Resident 100 was transferred to an acute care facility on March 5, 2023. The facility failed to provide documentation that the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified of Resident 100's transfer to an acute care facility. Review of Resident 127's clinical record revealed that they were transferred to the hospital on April 13, 2023. A written letter with the required content was not provided to the Office of the State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$282,733 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-06-24
  • $124,479 — penalty dated 2024-06-24
  • $141,453 — penalty dated 2023-08-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.5-2.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS PM PA OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/15/2022
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2002
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/14/2022
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/15/2022
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
PRESSEY, JEANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2025
ZIRKER, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/14/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.9M
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 4%Other / private 9%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$350per resident / day
operating cost
$10,636per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$319per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395685. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next