West Reading Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ce

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 152.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain activities of daily living (showering) for five of 11 sampled residents. (Residents 2, 5, 8, 9, 11)Findings include:Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had no cognitive impairment, and required assistance from staff for showers and personal hygiene. Review of facility documentation revealed that the resident was to receive a shower on Tuesdays and Fridays. In an interview on May 2, 2026, at 10:03 a.m., Resident 2 denied refusing any showers and stated that he was told that there aren't enough aides to provide showers. A review of the clinical record for the past 30 days revealed no documented evidence that Resident 2 received, was offered, or refused a shower on April 3, 7, or 28, 2026.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with dining in a manner that promoted and maintained dignity for one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 3) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 3 had diagnoses that included muscle wasting, dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), protein-calorie malnutrition, and history of a traumatic brain injury. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated December 19, 2025, revealed that the resident had significant cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with eating. Review of Resident 3's care plan revealed that staff was to assist the resident with meals as needed, encourage the resident to take small bites, provide verbal cues to take frequent drinks, and check for food in the mouth after swallowing. On January 28, 2026, from 12:25 p.m. through 12:40 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN) 1 was observed standing while assisting Resident 3 with lunch. In an interview on January 29, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed to accurately reflect the current status of three of 31 sampled residents. (Residents 1, 10, 13)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 received oxygen therapy starting on September 25, 2025. The MDS assessment dated [DATE], incorrectly indicated in Section O (Special treatments, Procedures, Programs) that the resident was not receiving oxygen therapy during the previous seven days. In an interview on January 29, 2026, at 10:50 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident 1's MDS assessment was inaccurate. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 10 had diagnoses that included hepatic (liver) failure and asthma. Review of Resident 10's MDS dated [DATE], indicated that Resident 10 received an anticoagulant medication. Review of Resident 10's clinical record revealed no physician's orders for an anticoagulant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physicians' orders for two of 31 sampled residents. (Residents 1 and 30)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and renal dialysis. A physician's order dated December 12, 2025, directed staff to administer a blood pressure medication (midodrine) three times a day on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday and two times a day on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The physician ordered that staff were not to administer the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the first measurement of blood pressure when the heart beats and the pressure is at its highest) was greater than 130 millimeters of mercury (mm/Hg). Review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Records (MARs) for December 2025 and January 2026, revealed that staff administered midodrine three times in December and four times in January when Resident 1's SBP was greater than 130mm/Hg. Clinical record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow policies and procedures to prevent the spread of infection for one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 113)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, (EBP) last reviewed November 14, 2025, revealed that enhanced barrier precautions were to be used with any resident with an indwelling medical device when contact is expected. Precautions included the use of protective gowns during the high risk activities and staff were to be trained on what was considered high risk activity. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 113 had diagnoses that included a stroke and dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), and had a gastrostomy tube (a tube to deliver nutrition, fluids, or medication directly into the stomach) in place. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated November 3, 2025, revealed that the resident had significant cognitive impairment and had a feeding tube. Review of Resident 113's care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a fully functioning resident call bell system for one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 30).Findings include:Review of the facility policy NSG Call Lights, dated November 15, 2025, revealed the statement, Patients will have a call light or alternative communication device at each patient's bedside, toilet, and bathing room to allow patients to call for assistance when unattended. Observation on January 27, 2026, at 11:27 a.m., revealed the call light failed to light and the signal failed to sound at the nurse's station when the button on the cord at Resident 30's bed was pressed. During an interview at 11:45 a.m., Nurse Aide 1 (NA 1) confirmed the cord was damaged and required replacement.During an interview on January 28, 2026, at 1:30 p.m., the Administrator confirmed that the facility failed to maintain a fully functioning resident call bell system in one room.28 PA Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa Code 205.28 (c)(1) Nurses' station.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained each resident's dignity and preferences to promote quality of care for four of seven sampled residents. (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 1 had diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and hyperlipidemia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the care plan revealed that the resident had an activities of daily living, (ADL), care deficit related to cognitive deficits and the intervention was for staff to assist with hygiene and grooming. Review of the shower/bathing documentation revealed that the preferred shower schedule was on Mondays and Thursdays during the day shift. Review of the shower documentation between January 2, 2025, through February 17, 2025, revealed that there were twelve…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department and on one of three nursing units. (Nursing unit 2) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Food Handling, dated November 15, 2024, revealed that staff were to label food items with the date prepared or opened. At the beginning of each meal service, staff were to obtain tray line holding food temperatures and record them onto the Production Worksheet. Observations during the kitchen tour on December 8, 2024, at 9:23 a.m., revealed the following: In reach-in cooler #1, there were two chef salads, three opened bags of cheddar cheese, lettuce, shredded carrots, and an opened container of diced tomatoes that were not dated. There was dried food debris on the bottom of the cooler. In reach-in cooler #2, there was an opened bag of diced potatoes and parmesan cheese that were not dated. In reach-in cooler #3, there were three cups of dished crushed pineapple that were not dated. In reach-in cooler #6,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietary services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian. Findings include: During an interview on December 8, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., the dietary manager stated the facility did not employ a certified dietary manager. In an interview conducted on December 10, 2024, at 11:30 a.m., the Administrator confirmed that there was not a full-time dietitian employed onsite at the facility and that the facility did not employ a qualified certified dietary manager in the absence of a full-time dietitian. 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(3) Management.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, review of facility documentation, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the pre-approved menus. (Residents 16, 22, 208) Findings include: During the Resident Council interview conducted on December 9, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., four of four residents stated that food items at meals were often substituted without notice. Review of the facility menus revealed the lunch meal on December 8, 2024, was to include roasted potatoes, dinner roll, and fruit pie. The lunch meal on December 9, 2024, was to include fruit ambrosia salad. Observation of Resident 16 and Resident 208's lunch meal ticket on December 8, 2024, at 1:10 p.m., revealed that the meal should have included roasted potatoes, a dinner roll, and fruit pie. The residents received mashed potatoes, fruit ambrosia salad, and no dinner roll. On December 9, 2024, at 12:55 p.m., Resident 16 and Resident 22's meal ticket revealed that the meal should have included fruit ambrosia salad and the residents received applesauce. In an interview on December 10, 2024, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA