No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hopkins Center

8100 Washington Lane, Wyncote, PA 19095 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (215) 576-8000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations$155,155 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $155,155 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-03)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8101 Washington Ln · (215) 886-0440 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
261 Old York Rd Lbby 212 · (215) 330-4445 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
620 Greenwood Ave · (215) 277-3474 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(610) 555-1212 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.1%16.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.7%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.2%10.8%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.7%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.8%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.1%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.7%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.2%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.0%68.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.1%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.8%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.521.621.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.891.181.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.2%CMS range 34.1–61.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.7%CMS range 8.7–18.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.3–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
52.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 88.5 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-07)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, review of facility policies, observations, resident, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely ensure the location of a resident who went on a leave of absence and failed to provide education on how to monitor blood sugar levels per sliding scale and administration of insulin medication. This failure resulted in an Immediate jeopardy situation for Resident R1 who was provided insulin medication without education of blood sugar management and insulin administration prior to a leave of absence and for the failure to ensure the location of Resident R1 who failed to return to the facility per physician's order for one of 31 residents reviewed. (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Leave of Absence/Therapeutic Leave: Patient revised November 1, 2023, revealed the patient must have a physician's order for a leave of absence (LOA)/ Therapeutic leave Therapeutic leave is described as an absence for the purpose other than required hospitalization. The release of Responsibility for Leave of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident who was at risk for elopement, and failed to secure windows on the unit, for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation as Resident R1 exited the building through a second-floor window and sustained serious injuries, including a laceration to his head requiring sutures and multiple facial fractures. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Elopement of Patient dated revised October 24, 2022, revealed, Patients/Residents will be evaluated for elopement risk upon admission, re-admission, quarterly, and with a change in condition as part of the clinical assessment process. Those determined to be at risk will receive appropriate interventions to reduce risk and minimize injury. Continued review revealed, Elopement is defined as any situation in which a patient leaves the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical records, and interview with staff; it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan and interventions to address Resident R75 diagnosis of alcohol dependency. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R75 who was observed with signs/symptoms of intoxication, transferred to hospital, and diagnosed with alcohol intoxication which required intravenous therapy for one of 38 residents reviewed. (Resident R75) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Person Center Care Plan revised October 24, 2022, revealed the center must develop and implement a baseline person centered care plan within 48 hours of admission for each resident that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional standards of quality care. A comprehensive person-centered care plan must be developed for each patient and must describe the following services that are to be furnished, any service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility documentation, clinical records, hospital records, and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate staff supervision and failed to complete a thorough assessment of the resident environment for Resident R75 with a diagnosis of alcohol dependency. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R75 who was found with symptoms of intoxication, transferred to the hospital, diagnosed with alcohol intoxication with a blood alcohol level of 276 mg/dL and required intravenous therapy for one of 38 residents reviewed. (Resident R75) Findings include: Review of Resident R75's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of alcohol dependence, Bipolar Disorder (condition in which a person has periods of depression, and periods of being extremely happy), history of transient ischemic attack (stroke), alcohol cirrhosis of liver (severe scaring of the liver), generalized anxiety disorder, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to prevent resident neglect by not following safe resident care guidelines which resulted in harm to Resident R1 who sustained fractures of the left humerus, the spine, and contusion to the right shin for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Safe Resident Handling Program dated April 15, 2023, revealed, Transfer assistance, mobility, and other resident handling tasks are to be carried out in accordance with the Lift/Transfer Assessment and care plan. Review of facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition, dated October 24, 2022, revealed, Centers prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident/patient property, and exploitation for all patients. Continued review revealed, Neglect is defined as the failure, indifference or disregard of the Center, its employees, or service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policies and documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident remained free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm with serious injuries, including a laceration requiring sutures and multiple facial fractures to Resident R1, for one of five residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse Prohibition dated revised October 24, 2022, revealed, Neglect is defined as the failure, indifference, or disregard of the Center, its employees, or service providers to provide care, safety, goods and services to a patient that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. This includes the failure to implement an effective communication system across all shifts for communicating necessary care and information between Center, patient, practitioners, and patient representatives. Continued review revealed, Serious bodily injury is an injury involving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident R19's care plan was updated to include one-to-one supervision with all meals after Resident R19 sustained a choking incident. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R19 who experienced a second choking incident, falling to the floor, requiring suctioning and was subsequently transferred to the hospital sustaining a laceration to the left eye which required stitches for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R19). Also, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan related to hospice services for one of 21 residents reviewed. (Resident R88) Findings include: Observation of Resident R19 on [DATE], at 9:43 a.m. revealed that the resident was observed in the hallway in a hospital gown, in her wheelchair, the resident had a laceration to her left eye with yellow bruising. Review of Resident R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment of resident's care needs) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of the facility ' s policy titled Abuse Prohibition revised October 2022 defines abuse as the willful infliction of injury resulting in physical harm injury or mental anguish. The same policy states anyone who witnesses an incident . injuries of unknown origin will report the incident to his/her supervisor immediately . the supervisor will report the suspected abuse immediately to the Administrator. Review of Resident R1's clincial record revealed the resident diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), vascular dementia (a type of dementia caused by damage to the blood vessels in the brain leading to cognitive decline) and documented as severely cognitively impaired. Review of facility documentation and investigation dated October 6, 2025, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Employee E3 noticed a bruise on Resident R1 ' s hand. Nurse Aide (NA), Employee E4 witness statement revealed the NA first noticed the bruising when providing care on the resident on Sunday, October 5,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident council interview, staff interviews, review of facility policy and reviews of the established mealtime schedule, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a nourishing snack was provided when 14 hours are between a substantial evening meal and breakfast on the three of three nursing units. (First, Second, and Third Floors). Findings include:Findings include:A review of facility policy titled Snacks, Revised September 2017, revealed that bedtime snacks will be provided foal l residents. The dining services department will assemble and deliver to each unit the individually planned snack items and bulk snack items to be offered at bedtime. Continued review revealed that Nursing Services is responsible for delivering the individual snacks to the identified residents and for offering evening snacks to all other residents. A review of the established meal schedule for the residents revealed that the supper meal was scheduled for 4:45 p.m. on the first and second-floor nursing units; 5:00 p.m. on the third-floor nursing unit; and 5:15 p.m. on the third-floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, staff interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain personal privacy for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R80).Findings include:On August 4, 2025, at approximately 11:00 a.m., the first-floor conference room began to experience a ceiling leak. Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, and three maintenance staff were notified. Upon arriving at room [ROOM NUMBER], it was observed that the sink was clogged and overflowing onto the bathroom floor. Standing water was present on the floor and leaking into the first-floor conference room. While three maintenance staff were working on the plumbing issue, Resident R80 was receiving morning care. It was observed that Resident R80's privacy curtain only covered a quarter of the resident's bed, failing to provide full privacy.On August 5, 2025, at 12:52 p.m., an interview with Resident R80 revealed that the resident only has half of the privacy curtain in (her/his) room. Resident R80…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean, safe, comfortable and homelike condition in one of two nursing floors (2nd floor nursing unit). Findings include:On August 4, 2025, at approximately 11:00 a.m., the first-floor conference room began to experience a ceiling leak. The surveyor notified the Administrator, Employee E1, and three maintenance staff were sent to investigate the plumbing issue on the second floor. Upon arriving at room [ROOM NUMBER], it was observed that the sink was clogged and overflowing onto the bathroom floor. Standing water was present on the floor and leaking into the first-floor conference room. On August 5, 2025, at 12:52 p.m., an interview with Resident R80 revealed that her bathroom sink had leaking pipes, which caused water to drip onto the floor and resulted in water damage to both the floor and the first-floor conference room ceiling. She reported that this issue had reoccurred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not complete a comprehensive care plan for two of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R42 and R2). Findings include:Review of facility policy Prosthetics and Orthotics dated December 16, 2024 revealed that Nursing will routinely: inspect the prosthesis and/or orthostatic device to determine if it fits correctly and is functioning as intended, or if it is in need for repair. Evaluate skin/mucus membrane that comes in contact with the prosthesis to ensure it is free of abrasion, wounds, or irritation.Review of clinical record for Resident R2 revealed that the resident had diagnosis including acquired absence of right leg below knee, acquired absence of right leg below knee, and peripheral vascular disease.Review of clinical record dated June 27, 2025, revealed that the resident that while giving shower nurse aide noted new skin issue. Resident was noted stage 2 pressure injury to left lateral inner knee. Resident stated it was from his prostheses being too tight and mentioned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the observations, interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications according to professional standards of practice three of three medication administrations observed. (Residents R59, R39 and R50)Findings Include:According National Library of Medicine (Operated by the United States federal government, a biomedical library and a national resource for health professionals, scientists, and the public) five rights of medication use: the right patient, the right drug, the right time, the right dose, and the right route-all of which are generally regarded as a standard for safe medication practices.Observation of the Medication Administration by Employee E13, Licensed Practical Nurse for Resident R59 on August 6, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. revealed that the nurse prepared the medication for Resident R59, walked into resident room and administered the medication. The nurse did not verify the resident's first and last name, date of birth or name at the door prior to entering resident's room to administer the medication.Continued observation revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was revealed that the facility failed to modify protein needs and implement interventions consistent with the resident's assessed needs and current professional standards of practice of nutritional status as it relates to pressure ulcer prevention for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident R82). Findings include:Review of facility policy titled, Estimating Protein Needs dated 2015, revealed that residents at risk for pressure ulcers require 1.2g/kg (grams per kilogram).Review of Resident R82's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Aphasia (affected communication), obesity, dysphasia (impairment in the production of speech), and multiple sclerosis (disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body).Review of Resident R82's Nutrition assessment dated [DATE], revealed a protein factor of 1.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not provide pharmacy services according to professional standards of practice for one of four residents reviewed. (Resident R50) Findings Include:Review of drug information for Fish oil revealed that Omega-3-acid ethyl [NAME] capsules are a prescription medicine used along with a low fat and low cholesterol diet to lower very high triglyceride (fat) levels in adults. Take omega-3-acid ethyl [NAME] capsules whole. Do not break open, crush, dissolve, or chew omega-3-acid ethyl [NAME] capsules before swallowing. If you cannot swallow omega-3-acid ethyl [NAME] capsules whole, tell your healthcare provider. You may need a different medicine.Review of physician order for Resident R50 dated March 8. 2024 revealed an order for Omega-3 Fatty Acids Capsule 1000 MG, give one capsule by mouth one time a day.Observation of the Medication Administration by Employee E14, Licensed Practical Nurse for Resident R50 on August 6, 2025, at 9:32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, professional standards of practice and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater for three of four residents observed during medication administration (Resident R50, Resident R59 and R39). Findings includeObservation of the Medication Administration by Employee E13, Licensed Practical Nurse for Resident R59 on August 6, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. revealed that the nurse gave Resident R59 her eye drops walked to the other side and took vital signs of Resident R39. On her way back to the medication cart she collected the eye drops from Resident R59 and placed it in the medication cart. Employee E13 did not complete Resident R59's medication administration prior to checking Resident R39's vital signs. Employee E13 also did not ensure that the resident was administering the eye drop appropriately as ordered by the physician including the dosage and correct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical record, facility policy, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to exercise proper infection control techniques for one of two nursing units observed (Second Floor Nursing Unit) and two of four medication administration pass observed. (Resident R39 and Resident R59)Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised December 16, 2024, revealed Standard Precautions, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) will be used (when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply) for novel or targeted [NAME]- drug resistant organism (MDROs). To reduce the risk of transmission of epidemiologically important microorganism by direct or indirect contact. On August 4, 2025, at approximately 10:00 a.m., Resident R80 was observed receiving care from Nursing Assistant, Employee E5, who was not wearing any Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), despite EBP signage posted on the resident's door.An observation on August 4, 2025, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, interviews with resident and staff and review of facility documentation, revealed the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for residents for two of eleven resident rooms reviewed (Resident R4 and R7) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Center Operations Policies and Procedures with a revision date of February 1, 2023. The policy states, The resident/patient has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including, but not limited to, receiving treatment and support for daily living safely. Patients have the right to reside and receive services in the center with reasonable accommodation of individual needs and preferences, expect when the health or safety of the individual or other patients would be endangered. Further review of the policy under process states, 1.6 Comfortable and safe temperature levels. Facilities initially certified before October 1, 1990 must maintain a temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that care plans were revised in a timely manner related to discharge planning for one of six records reviewed (Resident R2). Findings include: Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including, but not limited to, bipolar disorder, alcohol dependence, and chronic pain. Further review revealed that the resident had been issued a discharge notice, dated March 4, 2025, which stated we are hereby notifying you that effective April 4, 2025, which is thirty (30) days from the date of this letter, you will be discharged from [the facility]. The documented reason was the resident has failed .to pay for .a stay at the facility. Review of the resident's care plan revealed that she had a care plan developed on January 14, 2025, which stated [Resident R2] plans to remain at [the facility] for LTC (Long Term Care) placement. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for nurse aide staff as required for five of five nurse aide personnel files reviewed (Employees E5, E6, E21, E22 and E23). Findings include: Review of Employee E5's personnel filed revealed that the employee was hired by the facility on June 13, 2023, as a nurse aide. Continued review revealed than an annual performance review had not been completed for the employee. Review of Employee E6's personnel filed revealed that the employee was hired by the facility on July 16, 2004, as a nurse aide. Continued review revealed than an annual performance review had not been completed for the employee. Review of Employee E21's personnel filed revealed that the employee was hired by the facility on October 2, 2006, as a nurse aide. Continued review revealed than an annual performance review had not been completed for the employee. Review of Employee E22's personnel filed revealed that the employee was hired by the facility on April 1, 2020, as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, observations, review of facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement special contact precautions, enhanced barrier precautions and practice infection control practices related to residents reported to be under precautions for care for four of eight residents reviewed. (Resident R15, Resident R7, Resident 69 amd Resident 75) Findings include: Review a facility policy titled Special Contact and Droplet Precautions Revised dated February 24, 2025, revealed special contact and droplet precautions will be used to prevent transmission of infectious organisms that can be spread via pathogens that spread through the air or by direct person to person respiratory transmission. An example of a disease requiring special droplet and contact precaution is SARS / COVID. Further review of this policy revealed anyone entering the room must wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE)including respiratory protection N95 respirator, gowns, and gloves prior to entering the room of those who require special…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of documentation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a Notification of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) and an Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) for three of three residents reviewed (Resident 91, Resident 151, Resident 152). Findings include: Review of facility documentation for three residents revealed a Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was not provided to Resident 91, Resident 151 or Resident 152. Review of facility documentation for three residents revealed Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) was not provided to Resident 91, Resident 151 or Resident 152. Interview with the Administrator in Training, Employee E8, on March 13, 2025 at 1:42 p.m. revealed that the facility could not locate a NOMNC or an ABN notification for Resident 91, Resident 151 or Resident 152. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator on March 13, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. confirmed that the facility could not provide evidence that Resident 91, Resident 151 or Resident 152 received a NOMNC or an ABN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the facility policy and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were available and operable for resident use for two of 38 residents observed residents. (Residents R63 and R39) Findings include: Review of facility policy, Call Lights, revised June 6, 2021, revealed that all Genesis Healthcare patients will have a call light or alternative communication device within their reach at all times when unattended. Interview with Resident R63 in room [ROOM NUMBER], on March 10, 2025, at 11:25 a.m. revealed that he does not use the call bell much and he pointed to the call bell which was wound around the bedrails. It was noted that the other end of the cord was cut off and laying on the floor, and the severed cord attached to the plug was in the wall jack. When the button was pushed it did not activate. Further observation of the light on the ceiling outside her door revealed that it did not light after pressing the button multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and review of facility provided documentation, it was determined facility did not ensure to provide a sanitary, comfortable environment for residents for four out of 11 rooms observed on third floor unit (Room# 300, 302, 304, 305) Findings include: Review of facility provided policy 'Accommodation of Needs,' revised on February 1, 2023, indicates that residents have a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, and housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary , orderly and comfortable interior. Observations on March 10, 2025 at 9:39 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed food crumbs on floor, and a strong urine odor. Further observations on March 10, 2025 at 11:56 a.m., revealed dry yellow substance under chair on floor, urinal on floor. Further observations on March 10, 2025 of room [ROOM NUMBER], at 9:45 a.m., revealed mustard packets on floor under bedside table, empty soda can on floor, sweetener packets, lotion cap on floor, papers and a brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident's responsible party interview and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that advanced notice was provided to the resident and his emergency contact of care plan meetings and failed to ensure that care plan meetings were held in a timely manner for 3 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2 and R3). Findings include: Review of Resident R1's person-centered plan of care indicated that the resident had impaired thought processes related to diagnosis of dementia. Review of a nursing note dated November 22, 2024 at 7:27 a.m. documented that the resident was disoriented and required cues. Review of a nursing note dated November 22, 2024, at 11:33 p.m. documented that the resident was confused and required cues. The note also documented that the resident had a wander guard (a device that is placed on an individual's wrist or ankle, who has been identified as an elopement risk, and alerts staff when the resident is an area that is not safe) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an effective pest control program and a pest free environment. Findings include: Review of the facility's contract with a local pest control company which began May 13, 2024 indicated that the pest control company services will cover mice, ants, all species of roaches, and stinging insects up to 15 ft high. The pest control company indicated that the services in the contract do not include bed bugs, termites and wildlife. Continued review of the pest control contract indicated that the company will provide services to the facility twice monthly, and that the company will inspect, monitor and treat as needed for the above primary targeted pests, in addition to servicing resident rooms by request, check and date the pest log book in kitchen, and all nursing stations, in addition to other listed tasks during their visit. During an interview with the emergency contact for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident's emergency contact interviews, review of faciltiy policy and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that documented room change notifications to the resident and emergency contact were provided for 1 out of 7 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Room Changes, with a revision date of January 25, 2024, indicated that Notification of room change of new roommate will be provided within reasonable/required time when necessary. Continued review of the policy also indicated that social services or designee will process and coordinate all request for room changes in accordance with state and federal guidelines. Continued review of the policy indicated that if the room change is patient initiatived, the facility will discuss the move request with the patient and/or patient representative and appropriate staff. Review of the December 2024 physician orders for Resident R1 indicated that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and review of the clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed for this care area (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Discharge Planning Process, with a revision date of November 15, 2022 indicated that the facility must implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the patient's/resident's/ discharge goals, the preparation of patients to be active partners and effectively discharge them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions. Continued review of the policy indicated that the facility's discharge planning process will include, involving the patient and resident representative in order to establish goals of care and treatment preferences; recommending options for the continuing care of the patient; referring the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation related to an allegation of mental abuse for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of facility policy Abuse Prohibition revised October 24, 2022, revealed mental abuse includes, but is not limited to humiliation, harassment, and threats of punishment or deprivation. Mental abuse may occur through verbal or nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the patient to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation. Further review revealed the facility is to report allegation to the appropriate state and local authority involving neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, suspected criminal activity, and misappropriation of patient property within 24 hours if the event does not result in serious bodily injury. Review of Resident R1's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview with staff and residents and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a functional heating unit for one of eight rooms observed. (room [ROOM NUMBER]) Findings include: Observation completed on November 6, 2024 at 10:15 a.m., on 2nd floor unit, revealed a non-working unit in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Further observations revealed non-working unit was used to hold resident's hygiene supplies, linens and personal belongings. Interview with Resident R1 who resides in room [ROOM NUMBER], on November 6, 2024 at 10:15a.m., revealed that he was told that a portable heating unit was installed temporarily during last week of October 2024 in the unit in room [ROOM NUMBER] but cold air comes out only. Observations and interview with facility's Director of Maintenance, Employee E3, on November 6, 2024 at 10:45 a.m., revealed that broken unit in room [ROOM NUMBER] had temporary air conditioner installed in unit, not a portable heating unit, which was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an effective pest control program and a pest free envioronment. Findings include: Review of the facility's contract with a local pest control company which began May 13, 2024 indicated that the pest control company services will cover mice, ants, all species of roaches, and stinging insects up to 15 ft high. The pest control company indicated that the services in the contract do not include bed bugs, termites and wildlife. Continued review of the pest control contract indicated that the company will provide services to the facility twice monthly, and that the company will inspect, monitor and treat as needed for the above primary targeted pests, in addition to servicing resident rooms by request, check and date the pest log book in kitchen, and all nursing stations, in addition to other listed tasks during their visit. Review of the pest control logs on both 2nd and 3rd floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records, interview with staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to revise a resident's PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) with mental health diagnosis for 3 of 21 resident records reviewed (Resident R37, R63 and R15). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Pre-admission Screening for Mental Disorder and or Intellectual Disability Patients, revised February 16, 2024, revealed the center social worker or designated staff will assure that all patients with mental disorders and or intellectual disability receive appropriate pre-admission screening according to federal and state regulation. The social service will coordinate updates as needed and notify the state mental health authority after any significant change in the mental or physical changes in a resident who has a mental disorder. Review of resident R15's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents) dated August 2, 2024, revealed that Resident R15 was admitted into the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Level 2 PASARR was conducted for residents with mental disorders as required for two of four residents reviewed. (Resident R86 and R13) Findings include: Review of facility policy 'pre-admission screening for mental disorder and/or intellectual disability patients,' revised on February 16, 2024, states the following: To ensure that all individuals are screened for a mental disorder (MD) and/or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission, and To ensure that individuals identified with MD or ID are evaluated and receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Further review of facility policy revealed that social services will review PASRR to determine appropriate care needs and refer to the appropriate state designated authority when a patient is identified as having an evident or possible MD, ID or related condition. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that included a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for seven of seven months reviewed. Finding include: A review of the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) guideline, The core element of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, revealed that improving the use of antibiotic resistance is a national priority. 1. Antibiotic Stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. 2 the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that all acute care hospitals implement an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) and outlined the seven core elements which are necessary for implementing successful ASP's. 2.CDC also recommends that all nursing home take steps to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and reduce inappropriate use. Nursing Homes monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policies and procedures, employee personnel records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an abuse prohibition policy that required a thorough investigation of prospective employees' employment history for one of five newly hired employees reviewed. (Employees 8) Findings include: The policy titled OPS300 Abuse Prohibition revision date October 24, 2022, states centers prohibit abuse, mistreatment, neglect, misappropriation of resident/ patient (hereinafter patient) property, and exploitation for all patients. The center will implement an abuse prohibition program through the following: screening of potential hires. A review of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Employee E8's personnel file revealed that Employee E8 was hired on May 22, 2024, out of state. A continued review of the personnel file revealed no documented evidence that an FBI or fingerprint was completed. Interview conducted on August 15, 2024, at 10:07 a.m. with Administrator, Employee E1 confirmed that Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of documentation, review of clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not complete a thorough investigation of the alleged violation for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R252) Findings include: Review of R252's clinical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnosis of dementia, visual loss in both eyes, difficulty walking, anxiety, tremors, muscle weakness, and type two diabetes. Further review of clinical record revealed on July 23, 2024 at 4:24 PM, resident was seen sitting back in chair after attempting to elope down fire steps. Staff called to resident location and observed a small laceration above left eye and noted swelling to peri orbital area. Nurse practitioner, employee E10 , called and gave instructions to send resident out to emergency room for evaluation of unwitnessed fall and agitation. Progress note completed by licensed nurse, employee E12. Progress note dated July 23, 2024 at 11:13 PM, indicated R252 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interview with resident and staff it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans to address resident care needs related to restorative nursing program, antipsychotic use, and refusal of care for three of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R92, R89, and R70). Findings Include: Review of facility policy 'Person Centered Care Plan,' revised October 24, 2022, indicates that A comprehensive person-centered care plan must be developed for each patient and must describe the following: any services that would otherwise be required but are not provided due to the patient's exercise of rights, including the right to refuse treatment . Review of Resident R92's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated June 3, 2024, revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses of dementia (symptoms affecting memory,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement resident-directed care and treatment consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and care plan, physician orders, and professional standards of practice for two of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R22 and R29). Findings Include: Review of facility policy 'Enhanced Patient Supervision: Continuous 1:1,' revised on September 1, 2022, indicates that the designated staff will only be involved with the delivery of care to this patient and no other ; the designated staff must be with the patient at all times; must obtain coverage for breaks; and will provide positive interaction in conjunction with therapeutic interventions. Review of Resident R22's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated May 23, 2024, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident R22's clinical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received treatment and services to maintain or improve range of motion/mobility for one of one resident reviewed for limited range of motion (Resident R89). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Restorative Nursing revised August 7, 2023, revealed restorative programs are coordinated by nursing or in collaboration with rehabilitative and are patient specific based on individual patient needs. A licensed nurse must supervise the activities in a restorative nursing program. Review of Resident R89's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated May 8, 2024, revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and had diagnoses of stroke (when part of the brain does not have enough blood flow), and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of clinical records it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to assure the acquiring and administering of medications to meet the needs of each resident for one of 21 residents reviewed (Resident R95). Findings Include: Review of Resident R95's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated July 23, 2024, revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked due to the enlargement of the prostate gland). Review of Resident R95's August 2024 medication administration record revealed a physician order with a start date of August 9, 2024, for Cephalexin (antibiotic that fights bacteria in your body) 500 milligrams (mg) four times a day (scheduled at 6:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., 4:00 p.m., and 9:00 p.m.) for urinary tract infection. Per a review of the medication administration record, the Cephalexin was not signed out as administered for the 4:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. doses on August 9, 2024.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing failed to effectively manage the facility resulting in an immediate jeopardy situation regarding the safety of a resident who was on a leave of absence relating to the failure to located resident after not returning and not properly educating the resident on medication administration prior to leave of absence For one resident (Resident R 81 ) . Findings include: Review of the job description of the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) revealed that, the primary responsibility is accountable for all activities and departments of the Center subject to rules and regulations promulgated by government agencies to ensure proper health care services to residents. The Administrator administers, directs, and coordinates all activities of the Center to assure that the highest degree of quality of care is consistently provided to residents. The job description of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan related to intravenous (IV) therapy for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Observation on July 9, 2024, at 9:25 a.m. revealed that Resident R1 had a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter - a thin soft tube inserted in a vein in the arm with the tip of the tube positioned in a large vein that carries blood to the heart) line in his left upper arm. Review of Resident R1's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated June 27, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses including pneumonia (lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection) and septicemia (a life-threatening infection that occurs when bacteria enter the bloodstream). Continued review revealed that the resident received IV medications (intravenous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer intravenous (IV) medications in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents reviewed related to IV therapy (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Central Venous Access Device (CVAD) Dressing Change dated June 1, 2021, revealed, Central vascular access devices (CVADs) include: Peripherally inserted central catheter [PICC - a thin soft tube inserted in a vein in the arm with the tip of the tube positioned in a large vein that carries blood to the heart]. Continued review revealed that the length of the external catheter should be measured during dressing changes by measuring from the insertion site to where the catheter meets the hub to assess for line migration and to measure the arm circumference ten centimeters above the antecubital (inside of the elbow) and compare to baseline measurements to assess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of review of personnel files, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the specific competencies and skills sets necessary to care for residents' needs related to medication administration and infusion therapy, which resulted in a significant medication error for Resident R1, for two of two personnel files reviewed (Employees E3 and E4). Findings include: Review of the Pennsylvania Nurse Practice Act, 49 Pa Code 21.145(f)(g) Functions of the LPN (licensed practical nurse), revealed, An LPN may perform only the IV therapy functions for which the LPN posses the knowledge, skill and ability to perform in a safe manner. Continued review revealed, Prior to the initiation of IV therapy, an LPN shall: Verify the order and identity of the patient. Further review revealed, An LPN who had met the education and training requirements . may perform the following IV functions . Administration of IV fluids and medications;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, facility documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents remained free from significant medication errors for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration dated April 30, 2024, revealed, Prior to administration of medication, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including, but not limited to the following: Verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose, at the correct route, at the correct rate, at the correct time, for the correct resident. Continued review revealed, During medication administration, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including, but not limited to the following: Verify resident identification per facility policy (e.g.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices related to hand hygiene and wound care for one of 8 residents reviewed (Resident R8). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Wound Dressings: Aseptic, revised on December 1, 2021, revealed that if gloves become contaminated, remove gloves, cleans hands, and apply clean gloves. Review of the Pennsylvania Department of Health document titled Wound Care Observation Checklist for Infection Control, dated April 2018, revealed that gloves should be changed and hand hygiene performed when moving from dirty to clean wound care activities. Review of clinical documentation revealed that Resident R8 was admitted on [DATE], and had diagnoses including unstageable pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of left heel, pressure ulcer of sacral region (end of the spine in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policies and documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse and a nurse aide maintained professional standards of quality of care for one of five residents reviewed (Resident R1). This failure resulted in Resident R1 eloping from the building through a second floor window due to lack of supervision and sustaining serious injuries. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Elopement of Patient dated revised October 24, 2022, revealed, For patients identified as at risk, an interdisciplinary elopement prevention patient-centered care plan will be developed with patient participation and patient representative when applicable. Review of facility policy, Nursing Documentation dated revised June 1, 2021, revealed, Nursing staff will not falsify or improperly correct nursing documentation. Continued review revealed, Nurses will not: Document services that were not performed; Document services before they are performed; Alter the nursing documentation of a coworker.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator and the Director of Nursing failed to effectively mange the facility related to the elopement of one resident (Resident R1) who sustained serious injuries and resulted in a Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of the job description for the Nursing Home Administrator revealed, Responsible for assuring that the center operates in full compliance with Federal and State regulations. Review of the job description for the Director of Nursing revealed, Overall accountability for providing leadership, direction, and administration of day-to-day operations associated with direct patient care activities, nursing practice, and clinical education and development, including continuous improvement of nursing services and staff to meet patients/residents and their families' needs and expectations. Review of Resident R1's care plan, dated initiated August 8, 2022, revealed that the resident was at risk for elopement related to the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility's documentation, interview with staff, and interview with residents, it was determined facility failed to ensure that smoking paraphernalia was not in resident possession and that resident were supervised during the smoking period in the designated smoking area for two out of two residents reviewed. (Resident R1 and R2) Findings include: Review of facility' 'Smoking' policy, revised on March 1st, 2022, 2.6.1 if the patient is cognitively and physically able to secure all smoking materials, the Center may allow him/her to maintain his/her own tobacco products in a locked compartment. 2.6.2 Patients will not be allowed to maintain their own lighter fluid or matches. Review of facility's 'smoke break schedule,' smoking is allowed on weekdays and weekends at 10AM and 4:00PM; smoking takes place on 3rd Fl (floor) patio. Review of R1's 'Smoking Evaluation', completed on August 24, 2023, revealed that resident was to be supervised during smoking times. Under section D1. Considerations: resident has a history of sharing/selling cigarettes or smoking material;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$155,155 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

  • $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-03-03
  • $53,966 — penalty dated 2025-03-03
  • $36,589 — penalty dated 2024-08-16
  • $7,796 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
  • $7,797 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
  • $38,649 — penalty dated 2023-08-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS PA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2011
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2012
SAMAI, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2023
KIMMEL, BRIANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 5%Other / private 13%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$321per resident / day
operating cost
$9,756per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$311per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395342. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next