Grandview Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 65.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.33 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.86 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.44 to 1.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-09 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are appealing a discharge from the facility remain or return to the facility pending their appeal for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #2.Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/4/2025, alleged that Resident ID #2 was admitted to the hospital, but Grandview would not accept the resident back. The complainant stated, I have no ramp here and no one to help me. Furthermore, the complaint alleges that an appeal was filed for an eviction notice issued on July 18th to The Executive Office of Health and Human Services, and the family was under the impression that the facility could not discharge the resident while in an active appeal. The complainant alleged that the family did not have the appropriate time to resolve the resident's Medicaid issues because it had only just been cancelled on July 9th. The resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen.Findings are as follows:1) Record review of The Rhode Island Food Code 2022 Edition 4.601.11 reads in part, .(A) equipment food contact surfaces .shall be clean to sight .During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 8/18/2025 at 9:15 AM, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), revealed an ice machine that was noted to have black wipeable matter on the white plastic cover of the ice dispenser, located inside of the ice machine.During a surveyor interview, immediately following the above observation, the FSD acknowledged the black wipeable matter on the ice dispenser and indicated that it is cleaned monthly by the facility and quarterly by an outside company.2) Review of the Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 5-202.13 states in part, An air gap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the PLUMBING FIXTURE .may not be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication refusals, Resident ID #5.Findings are as follows:According to [NAME] (2023), ninth edition, Nursing Procedures, page 745, states in part, If a medication wasn't administered, document the reason why, any interventions taken, practitioner notification, and the patient's response to interventions.Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in July of 2014 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, type two diabetes mellitus, vascular dementia, hypertension (high blood pressure), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD; a chronic condition where stomach acid flows back into the esophagus), and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR; a condition characterized by muscle weakness and stiffness).Record review revealed a physician's order dated 7/22/2024 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic, for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident ID #s 20, 22, and 36. Findings are as follows:According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes states in part, Perform antibiotic 'time outs .Nursing homes should have a process in place for a review of antibiotics by the clinical team two to three days after antibiotics are initiated to answer these key questions: Does this resident have a bacterial infection that will respond to antibiotics? If so, is the resident on the most appropriate antibiotic(s), dose, and route of administration? Can the spectrum of the antibiotic be narrowed or the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, surveyor observation, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing, for 1 of 2 residents observed for wound care, Resident ID #55.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Wound Dressings: Aseptic last revised 2/24/2025 states in part, .Evaluate comfort level/presence of pain and treat as indicated.discard soiled dressing.cleanse or irrigate wound and peri wound gently, as ordered.Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in May of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, a stage IV pressure ulcer (the most severe form of a pressure injury. It's characterized by a deep, open wound that extends through the skin, underlying tissue, muscle, and bone) and type II diabetes.Review of a Wound Evaluation and Summary dated 8/18/2025 revealed the resident has a stage IV…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Lovenox (an anticoagulant; a blood thinning medication), Resident ID #19.Findings are as follows:Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines dated January 2025, states in part, .Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record [MAR] .Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in August of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, the long term use of anticoagulants and stroke.Review of a physician's order dated 8/11/2025 revealed to administer Coumadin (a blood thinning medication) 6 milligrams (mg) once daily for valve replacement with a goal of achieving an international normalized ratio (INR; a blood test that measures how long it takes your blood to clot) of 2.5-3.5.Review of a physician's order dated 8/11/2025 revealed to inject…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality, relative to the use of borrowed medications and inaccurately documenting in the narcotic count book for 2 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 2 and 3. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 2/10/2025, revealed, Resident ID #3 was on hospice and received an order for Lorazepam Intensol 2 milligram (mg)/milliliter (ml) 0.25 ml every four hours and 0.25 ml every hour as needed. Resident ID #3 was presenting with symptoms, and the pharmacy was unable to deliver the Lorazepam Intensol, due to the medication being on back order. Resident ID #2 had an unused bottle of Lorazepam Intensol that was borrowed by the nurses to administer to Resident ID #3. a. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was admitted to the facility in January of 2025 with diagnoses including but not limited to, a malignant neoplasm (a cancerous tumor)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, staff and resident interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and relative to providing assistance to residents who require supervision and/or one-to-one assistance with eating for 3 of 4 residents reviewed, Residents ID #s 16, 54 and 60. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #16 was readmitted to the facility in May of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, osteoarthritis, anemia, and generalized muscle weakness. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating the resident's cognition is intact. Record review of a progress note dated 7/16/2024 revealed a hospice recommendation for one-to-one feeding assistance for all meals related to bilateral hand contractures. Review of a physician's order dated 7/30/2024 revealed one-to-one feeding assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to monitor and assess as outlined by the comprehensive care plan to meet professional standards of quality related to anticoagulant therapy (blood thinner) for 4 of 6 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 9, 10, 41, and 373. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #9 was readmitted to the facility in August of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that can lead to a stroke or other serious complications). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 8/7/2023 for Eliquis (a blood thinner that prevents or reduces the coagulation of blood, prolonging the clotting time) 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day. Review of the care plan last revised on 7/8/2024, states in part, .at risk for injury or complications related to the use of anticoagulation therapy . interventions include, but are not limited to, monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding. Record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0685 — pattern
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, staff and resident representative interviews, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives proper treatment to maintain hearing abilities for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hearing concerns, Resident ID #10. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, diabetes mellitus type 2 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Record review of a care plan dated 6/1/2023 revealed the resident has impaired communication as evidenced by being hard of hearing. Further record review revealed an intervention for an ears, nose, and throat (ENT) specialist or audiologist (a health-care professional who evaluates, diagnoses, treats, and manages hearing loss) consult to evaluate new hearing loss or progression of deteriorating hearing loss. During a surveyor interview on 7/30/2024 at 1:32 PM with the resident's family member, s/he indicated that the resident has difficulty hearing and increased hearing loss which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI