No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Willow Ridge Center

215 Richardson Way, Maynardville, TN 37807 · For profit - Corporation · 77 certified beds · (865) 992-5816 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (865) 992-5816 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
147 Oakland Ln · (865) 992-9977 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4344 Maynardville Hwy · (865) 992-9991 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food City0.9 mi
4344 Maynardville Hwy · (865) 992-9991 · Call to confirm hours
Park
115 Wilson Ln · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.2%14.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%6.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.2%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.7%13.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.1%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication44.1%31.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.2%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.3%16.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.5%79.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.4%22.6%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%11.2%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.881.671.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.171.561.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
28.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 28.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.1%CMS range 24.3–60.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 6.9–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge28.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge21.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.401.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
41.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 62.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-06-01)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2021-12-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention for 1 resident (#20) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans of 19 sampled residents. The facility's failure resulted in actual harm to Resident #20. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Falls Management, revised on 3/15/19 revealed .will receive appropriate interventions to reduce risk and minimize injury .PURPOSE .reduce risk for falls and minimize the actual occurrence of falls .PRACTICE STANDARDS .Develop individualized care plan . Medical record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Attention and Concentration Deficit Following Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease, Repeated Falls, Muscle Weakness, Reduced Mobility, General Anxiety Disorder, Memory Deficit, and Vascular Dementia. Medical record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 scored a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent falls by ensuring fall interventions were in place for 1 Resident (#20) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents of 19 sampled residents. The facility's failure resulted in harm for Resident #20. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Falls Management, revised on 3/15/19, revealed .Patients experiencing a fall will receive appropriate care and investigation of the cause .PURPOSE .reduce risk for falls and minimize the actual occurrence of falls .PRACTICE STANDARDS .Develop individualized care plan .Review and revise care plan regularly .Update care plan to reflect new interventions . Medical record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Attention and Concentration Deficit Following Unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease, Repeated Falls, Muscle Weakness, Reduced Mobility, General Anxiety Disorder, and Vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen, with the potential to affect 72 of 74 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Equipment revised 9/2018, showed .All foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order .All equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance with manufacturer's directions and training materials .All staff members will be properly trained in the cleaning and maintenance of all equipment .All food contact equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after every use .All non-food contact equipment will be clean and free of debris . During the initial kitchen tour observation on 5/30/2023 at 10:35 AM, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the stove was found with splashed brown food debris build up on both doors and the right handle of the oven. Observation of the convection oven had dried spattered brown food debris present on the right front of the oven adjacent to the control panel, a copious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for 1 Resident (#55) of 39 residents reviewed, failed to maintain the upkeep of painted walls in 2 of 4 hallways, failed to maintain the integrity and cleanliness of 2 speciality chairs of the 30 speciality chairs in the facility, failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for 1 of 1 shower rooms, and failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for 1 of 1 dining rooms. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Accommodation of Needs revised 2/1/2023, showed .The resident .has the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment .The Center must provide: A safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment . Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Viral Hepatitis C, and Osteomyelitis of Vertebra. Review of Resident 55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for 1 Resident (#53) to include pressure ulcer interventions of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Person-Centered Care Plan revised 10/24/2022, showed .Care plans will be .revised by the interdisciplinary team .as needed to reflect .care and changing needs . Review of the facility policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management revised 2/1/2023, showed .Staff will continuously observe and .implement revisions to the plan of care as needed . Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Intertrochanteric Fracture of Left Femur, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Muscle Weakness, Type 2 Diabetes, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Need for assistance with Personal Care and History of Falling. Review of a physician's telephone order dated 5/2/2023, showed .Apply sure-prep [a fast drying skin protectant] to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate a fall for 1 Resident (#53) of 3 falls reviewed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Falls: Care During and After dated 12/01/2006, showed .All residents who experience a fall will receive .investigation of the cause .Complete Resident Fall Investigation Form . Review of the facility policy titled Falls Management revised 6/15/2022, showed .A fall is defined as .coming to rest on the .floor .a fall is considered to have occurred when a patient is found on the floor . Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Intertrochanteric Fracture of Left Femur, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Muscle Weakness, Type 2 Diabetes, Mild Cognitive Impairment, History of falling, and Frontal Lobe and Executive Function Deficit. Review of a nursing note dated 3/4/2023, showed Resident #53 was observed sitting on the floor in the resident's room, .when asked resident what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to follow the facility policy to obtain a physician's order for an indwelling urinary catheter to include catheter care for 1 resident (#46) and failed to obtain a physician's order for the bulb size of an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 resident (#71) of 3 residents reviewed for catheter use. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Catheter: Indwelling Urinary [a tube placed in the bladder to allow urine to drain freely] -Insertion Of reviewed 9/24/2012, showed .Urinary catheters will be inserted in accordance with a physician's order .Verify physician's order .Attach the pre-filled, sterile syringe to the balloon port of the catheter .gently instill the appropriate amount of sterile water/solution (e.g. [for example] 5 cc [cubic centimeter] for 5 cc balloon] .Document: Catheter size, type, and amount of solution used to inflate balloon . Review of the facility policy titled Catheter:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for wound management, for 1 resident (#214) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled ,Person-Centered Care Plan, dated 7/1/2019, showed .A comprehensive, individualized care plan will be developed for each patient that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a patient's medical, nursing, nutrition, and mental and psychosocial needs . Resident #214 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Sepsis, Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb, Hypertension, Muscle Weakness, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of a physician's order dated 11/15/2021, showed .Clean non viable tissue to L [left] calf with wound cleanser. Apply xeroform gauze [a petrolatum based gauze]. Secure with kerlix [bandage roll] and ace [an elastic bandage] daily . Review of a nurse practitioner's progress note dated 11/17/2021, showed .On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and administered safely for 1 resident (Resident #33) of 7 residents observed and reviewed for medication administration when a nurse left the resident's medication at the bedside unattended. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration: General, revised 6/1/2021 showed .provide a safe, effective medication administration process .Remain with patient until administration is complete. Do not leave medications at the patient's bedside . Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Shortness of Breath, Major Depressive Disorder, Muscle Wasting, and Contractures of Right and Left Knee. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 5 day assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, job description, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for 1 of 38 resident rooms observed. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Preventive Maintenance, dated 6/2007 showed .Perform preventive maintenance on .physical plant on a schedule which factors in operational activity and complies with applicable code requirements . Review of the Maintenance Director's job description dated 10/6/2016, showed .The Maintenance Director is responsible for overall maintenance operation of the center .he is responsible for performing repairs .performing regular daily, weekly, and monthly maintenance checks, as shown on 'Preventive Maintenance Calendar' .Maintains the building in good repair .free of hazards .Maintains the building .in compliance with Federal, State, and local laws . Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]b on 12/5/2021 at 11:56 AM, showed a large hole in the wallboard behind the bed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to store clean pans and kitchen equipment under dry sanitary conditions; failed to ensure an expired food additive, expired food items and expired emergency water supply was not available for resident use in 1 of 1 kitchen observed. The findings include: Review of the facility Food and Nutrition Services Policy and Procedures entitled Receiving, with a revised date of 5/2014, revealed .It is the center policy that safe food handling procedures .will be practiced in the .storage of all food items .All food items will be stored in a manner that [insures] appropriate and timely utilization .Foods considered unsafe for consumption or beyond the expiration date will be discarded by staff . Observation and interview with [NAME] #1 on 5/19/19 at 9:00 AM, in the kitchen, revealed 4 of the 8 inch by 12 inch pans, and 2 of the 4 inch by 12 inch pans were stored wet. Continued observation revealed the meat slicer with dry debris; 75 (1) gallon jugs of the emergency water supply with a use by date of 4/22/19 and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-05-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility documentation, review of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) records, resident, family, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain adequate staffing levels to meet the care needs of 2 residents (#5, #39) of 19 sampled residents and failed to ensure medications were administered timely for 1 resident (#47) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), revision date 11/28/16, revealed .Activities of daily living (ADLs) include .Hygiene-bathing . grooming .To attain or maintain the patient's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being .receives necessary services to maintain good .grooming, and personal .hygiene . Medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Quadriplegia, Muscle Wasting, Acquired Absence of Unspecified Foot, Acute Kidney Failure and Major Depressive Disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living Record (ADL), observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide scheduled showers for 2 dependent residents (#5, #39) of 13 residents reviewed for ADLs of 19 sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs),with a revision date of 11/28/16, revealed .Activities of daily living (ADLs) include .Hygiene-bathing . grooming .To attain or maintain the patient's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being .receives necessary services to maintain good .grooming, and personal .hygiene . Medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Quadriplegia, Muscle Wasting, Acquired Absence of Unspecified Foot, Acute Kidney Failure and Major Depressive Disorder. Medical record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to administer oxygen therapy as ordered for 1 resident (#47) of 6 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy of 19 residents sampled. The findings include: Review of the facility policy Oxygen revised 12/1/18 revealed .Set liter flow per order .Attach prescribed oxygen delivery device. Apply oxygen delivery to the resident . Medical record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Encounter for Palliative Care, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Peripheral Vascular Disease, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. Medical record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored a 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed the resident required extensive assistance of 1 staff bed mobility, transfers, and supervision set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 medications were administered per Physician's Orders of 31 opportunities observed for 1 resident (#47) of 4 residents observed for medication administration resulting in an 6.45% medication error rate. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration: General, revised date 7/24/18 revealed .A licensed nurse .will administer medications to patients. Accepted standards of practice will be followed. Further review revealed .Practice Standards .Doses will be administered within one hour of the prescribed time unless otherwise indicated by the prescriber . Medical record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Essential Hypertension, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder and Encounter for Palliative Care. Medical record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
REGENCY HEALTH SERVICES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/02/2015
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2012
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2012
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2012
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2012
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2012
SUNBRIDGE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2012
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTORNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/01/2012
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2012
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
CUPP, STEVENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+14.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$860K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 80%Medicare 6%Other / private 13%

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $860K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$279per resident / day
operating cost
$8,485per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$326per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445284. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-06-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next