No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westwood Center

20 Westwood Medical Park, Bluefield, VA 24605 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (276) 322-5439 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited May 2021Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$159,612 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $159,612 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-27)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1033 Westwood Cmns · (276) 322-3947 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4001 College Ave · (276) 322-3551 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food City0.2 mi
1000 Leatherwood Ln · (276) 322-2515 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Stadium Dr · (304) 327-2448 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.6%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.4%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.5%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.3%18.7%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.9%15.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.0%20.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.2%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.6%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.8%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.3%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.0%73.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.8%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit24.9%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.881.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.431.481.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
35.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.59U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 35.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.6%CMS range 26.7–45.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.5%CMS range 10.5–17.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge35.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge30.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.1–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.301.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
1.25
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.80
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
61.7%
Total nursing turnover
88.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-21)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff follow physician's orders for 2 of 22 residents, Resident #9 and Resident #63. The findings included: 1. For Resident #9 the facility staff failed to administer the medication carvedilol per the physician's order. Resident #9's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to hypotension, anemia, and anxiety. Resident #9's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 08/08/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #9's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for Resident exhibits or is at risk for cardiovascular symptoms or complications related to hypertension. Interventions for this care plan include Administer meds as ordered . Resident #9's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, Carvedilol Tablet 12.5 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation to one of 57, residents, Resident #2. The findings included: For Resident #2, an agency-contracted staff failed to check code status and failed to initiate basic life support, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation for Resident #2. Resident #2 expired at the facility. Resident #2's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease with heart failure, and diabetes mellitus-type II. Resident #2's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of [DATE] assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #2's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, family interview, clinical record review, facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide wound management as evidenced by the absence of assessments, monitoring, and/or treatment for of 5 out 33 residents. This resulted in wound infections and/or wound deterioration for Resident #10, Resident #4, Resident #42, Resident #36, and Resident #149. The facility also failed to implement provider orders at the time they were ordered for 1 of 33 residents reviewed, Resident #199. On 3/15/23 at 3:50 PM, the surveyors notified the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy determination, Level IV Pattern. The facility staff implemented an abatement plan that was verified by the survey team through additional observations, interviews, and document reviews. The facility staff was notified that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 3/17/23 at 4:09 PM. The findings included: 1. For Resident #10 the facility staff failed to provide wound management resulting in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent an accident for 1 of 2 resident records reviewed. (Resident #1) The findings were: For Resident #1, facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent a tissue injury to the bottom of the resident's feet resulting in admission to an acute care hospital and eventually admission to a burn center. Resident #1's medical diagnoses included but were not limited to, dementia, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, second degree burn left foot, second degree burn of right foot, local infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, difficulty walking, and diabetes mellitus. Resident #1's minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/30/25 was signed as completed on 02/01/25. Within Section C (cognitive patterns) Resident #1 was assigned a brief interview for mental status summary score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. Section M (skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 6 closed record reviews, Resident #55 and Resident #209. This resulted in actual harm for resident #55 cited at past non-compliance. For resident #209, the facility failed to implement safety measures resulting in an elopement. The findings included: 1. For resident # 55 the facility staff failed to provide supervision as ordered by the physician and based on a recommendation by speech therapy, during meal times. Resident # 55's diagnoses included but were not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, history of a stroke, history of a traumatic brain injury and paranoid schizophrenia. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 7/17/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Under Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals, resident # 55 was coded as being independent for eating. Under section K…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to promote wound healing and prevent infection for four of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #37, 42, 299, 199. Resident #37 experienced harm due to the development of osteomyelitis and the subsequent invasive treatment procedures that were required. The findings include: 1. For resident #37, the facility failed to provide treatment as ordered to the resident's left heel pressure ulcer leading to osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone caused by infection). In the course of treating the infection, resident #37 received a surgical wound debridement, insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line) for intravenous (IV) antibiotics and two wound cultures. Each of these procedures were invasive and placed the resident at risk for further discomfort and stress. Resident #37's diagnoses included but were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure proper disposal and/or containment of the facility's garbage/waste. The findings included: On 8/19/24 at approximately 2:30 PM, this surveyor and other employee # 4 made observations of the facility's garbage disposal area located outside the facility but on the campus. There were two dumpsters noted. All of the doors on the dumpsters were closed, however there was scattered debris noted around each one. Surveyor noted 7 gloves, 4 Styrofoam cups, a large black trash bag with unknown contents, the bag was tied. There were 4 large pieces of brown wood lying on the ground between the dumpsters. The surveyor asked the employee if they knew what the wood was and they stated, It looks like something maintenance would have put there. It looks like it was a cabinet or something. On 8/20/21 at 4:15 PM the survey team met with the Administrator, Director of Nursing and Regional Nurse Consultant. Surveyor requested and received the policy entitled, Waste Management with a review date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide written notification of reasons for transfer or discharge to the resident and the resident's representative(s) and failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for four (4) or 22 sampled residents and/or residents' representatives, (Resident #30, Resident #17, Resident #5, and Resident #35). The findings include: 1. For Resident #30, the facility staff failed to provide the resident or the resident's representative written notice of the reason(s) of transfer/discharge to the hospital on 7/6/24 and failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the transfer/discharge. Resident #30's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Acute Kidney Failure, Encephalopathy, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Alzheimer's Disease, Weakness, Anemia, Bradycardia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Anxiety Disorder. The most recent minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide residents and/or residents' representatives with the facility bed hold policy upon transfer for four (4) of 22 sampled residents, (Resident #30, Resident #17, Resident #5, and Resident #35). The findings include: 1. For Resident #30, the facility staff failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative with the facility bed-hold policy upon transfer on 7/6/24. Resident #30's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Acute Kidney Failure, Encephalopathy, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Alzheimer's Disease, Weakness, Anemia, Bradycardia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Anxiety Disorder. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/15/24, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 5 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating Resident #30 was severely impaired in cognition. A review of the clinical record indicated Resident #30 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents and/or resident representatives had the opportunity to develop an advanced directive for 3 of 22 residents in the survey sample, residents # 32, # 44 and # 39. The findings included: 1. For resident # 32, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident had the opportunity to develop an advanced directive. Resident # 32's diagnoses included but were not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, sepsis, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, type II diabetes, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage 3. The minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/2/24, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating they were cognitively intact. During a review of the clinical record, a physician's order with a revision date of 6/26/24 that read, Full Code was noted. Under the Assessment tab, a document entitled, Social Services Assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set for 1 of 6 closed record reviews, Resident #56. The findings included: For Resident #56 the facility staff coded the minimum data set (MDS) as discharged to critical access hospital, when the resident discharged to the community. Resident #56's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to urinary tract infection, sepsis, and dementia. Resident #56's discharge MDS with an assessment reference date of 06/21/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Section A, subsection A 2105, Discharge Status coded the resident as being discharged to a critical access hospital. Resident #56's clinical record was reviewed and contained a Discharge Plan Documentation dated 06/20/24 which read in part, O. Discharge 1. Estimated/Scheduled discharge date and Time: 06/21/2024 4:00. A. 3. Discharge Destination: Home with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) was completed for 2 of 22 residents, Resident #21 and Resident #32. The findings included: 1. For Resident #21 the facility staff failed to ensure a level 1 PASARR was completed. Resident #21's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and bipolar disorder. Resident #21's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 06/18/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #21's clinical record was reviewed, and surveyor could not locate a level 1 PASARR. Surveyor requested from the director of nursing information regarding Resident #21's PASARR. On 08/21/24 at 9:35 am, the regional nurse consultant (RNC) informed the surveyor that they did not have the PASARR. RNC stated, We don't have that, we are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 6 closed record reviews, Resident #55. The findings included: Resident # 55's diagnoses included but were not limited to Alzheimer's, history of stroke, history of traumatic brain injury and paranoid schizophrenia. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 7/17/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 5 out of 15 indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS did not indicate that resident had any swallowing difficulty. During a review of resident # 55's clinical record, an order dated 5/27/24 was noted that read, Regular/liberalized diet Dysphasia Advanced texture for Pt requires feeding assistance. The order was put in by the Speech Therapist. A progress note 5/20/24 at 8:00 PM read in part, Resident was walking down the hallway pushing bedside table CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team for one (1) of 22 sampled residents, (Resident #5). The findings included: For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to reassess the effectiveness of the interventions and review and revise the resident's activity care plan to meet the resident's needs. Resident #5's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Anxiety Disorder, Cirrhosis of Liver, Chronic Embolism and Thrombosis of Unspecified Deep Veins of Lower Extremity-Bilateral (both sides), Depression, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, End Stage Renal Disease, Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Liver Transplant, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Generalized Edema. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/25/24, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 12 out of 15 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for 2 of 22 residents, Resident #39 and Resident #7. The findings included: 1. For Resident #7 the facility staff failed to provide nail care. Resident #7's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus, anxiety and depression. Resident #7's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 05/30/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 9 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. Section GG, functional goals and abilities, coded the resident as dependent for personal hygiene. Resident #7's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for Resident requires assistance/is dependent for ADL care related to HF (heart failure), DM (diabetes mellitus), resp. (respiratory) failure. Interventions for this care plan include Provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review facility staff failed to provide treatment and services to prevent and/or heal pressure ulcers for 1 of 22 residents in the survey sample, Resident #44. The findings included: Resident # 44's diagnoses included but were not limited to pressure ulcer of the sacral region, stage IV, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/12/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 which indicates a mild cognitive impairment. The MDS was coded to reflect a stage IV pressure area that was present on admission. The care plan for resident # 44 was reviewed. A problem statement that read, Documented pressure ulcer was noted. Under interventions the care plan read in part, Wound care per treatment order. There was an order dated 6/13/24 that read, Cleanse stage IV to sacrum with wound wash, pat dry, apply honey to wound bed, apply dry dressing, change daily and prn (as needed). This order was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide adequate respiratory care for 1 of 22 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #63). The findings include: For Resident #63 the facility staff failed to label and date each component of the oxygen extension tubing and failed to provide a new pre-filled humidifier bottle for resident upon utilization of the oxygen concentrator. Resident #63's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Streptococcal Arthritis to Right Knee, Sepsis, UTI (urinary tract infection), Acute Kidney Failure, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease-Stage 4, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, and Osteoarthritis. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of, 8/19/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating Resident #63 was cognitively intact. On 8/18/24 at 3:45 PM, surveyor interviewed Resident #63…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and during a medication pass and pour observation the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 1 of 22 residents, Resident #43. The findings included: For Resident #43 the facility staff failed to ensure the medication Diltiazem was available for administration. Resident #43's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to hypertension, congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Resident #43's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 08/13/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #43's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for Resident exhibits or is at risk for cardiovascular symptoms or complications related to hypertension, A FIb (atrial fibrillation), CHF (congestive heart failure). Interventions for this care plan included Administer medications as ordered . On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. For Resident #29 the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 was free of an unnecessary medication, Novolin. (Novolin is a medication used to treat diabetes.) Resident #29's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Lung Cancer, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Atrial Fibrillation, Fibromyalgia, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, and Chronic Kidney Disease-Stage 2. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/14/24, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating Resident #29 was cognitively intact. Resident #29's clinical record included a Nursing Report, that read in part, Includes the following Classifications: MRR (medication regimen review) For Recommendations Created Between 7/25/2024 And 7/25/2024 Includes Routings for: Nursing, IDT (interdisciplinary team) .Consultant Pharmacist .The resident has an order for NovoLIN R (regular) Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (milliliters) (Insulin Regular (Human)) Inject 22 (twenty-two) unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 22 residents was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, Resident # 43. The findings included: The facility staff failed to monitor resident # 43 for behaviors or side effects related to psychotropic medications. Resident # 43's diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified dementia without behavior disturbance, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, insomnia and chronic pain syndrome. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/13/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating they were cognitively intact. The MDS indicated the resident admitted to the presence of several mood indicators in the look back period. Resident # 43 reported little interest or pleasure in doing things, feeling down, depressed or hopeless, feeling tired or having little energy, and feeling bad about themselves. The medication administration record (MAR) was reviewed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 22 residents was free from significant medication errors. The findings included: For Resident #9 the facility staff failed to administer the medication, Meropenem per the physician's orders. Meropenem is an antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections. Resident #9's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to sepsis, severe sepsis with septic shock, necrotizing fasciitis, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) resistance, and pseudomonas. Resident #9's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 08/08/24 assigned the resident brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #9's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for Patient has a suspected/actual infection and is at risk for sepsis, has history of or risk factors for sepsis related to Septic Left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to appropriately store, prepare and/or serve resident food items. The findings included: On 8/18/24 at 2:12 PM during the initial tour of the dietary department, this surveyor and other employee # 4 entered the walk-in cooler. Employee # 4 had identified themselves as a cook/aide and stated, I'm second in command. They indicated they were in charge when the dietary manager is off. A plastic jug approximately 1/4 full, labeled peeled garlic was noted on the shelf. There were three dates written on the lid as follows, OP 3/20/24 underneath that 3/15/24 and underneath that was a date of 5/20, but the year was not legible, it had been smeared. Surveyor asked employee # 4 what each date means. They stated, This is the day it was opened pointing to the OP 3/20/24 date, and this would be the date that it came in because it's earlier pointing to the 3/15/24 date. When asked about the 5/20 date, they stated, I think that is 5/20/24. I think I need to throw it away. When surveyor asked what the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-20 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, the facility staff failed to obtain physician ordered labs for 4 of 33 residents, Resident #4, Resident #42, Resident #11, and Resident#199. The findings included: 1. For Resident #4 the facility staff failed to obtain physician ordered wound cultures. Resident #4's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to multiple sclerosis, depression, anxiety, and contractures of muscles. The most recent MDS with an assessment reference date of 02/06/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Section M, skin conditions, coded the resident as having one stage one pressure ulcer that was present upon admission. Section M, subsection M1040, other ulcers, wounds and skin problems coded the resident as none of the above present. This subsection includes surgical wounds. Resident #4's comprehensive care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and document review, the facility staff failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) notification for one (1) of three (3) residents selected for SNF Beneficiary Notification Review (BNR) (Resident #2). The findings include: Three (3) residents were selected for SNF Beneficiary Notification Review. These three (3) residents were selected from the list of Medicare beneficiaries who were discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the past 6 months prior to the survey; this list was provided by facility staff members. Resident #2 was marked as not being provided a SNF ABN due to resident no longer required skilled services (and) switched to Medicaid services. On 3/13/23 at 1:13 p.m., the facility's Business Office Manager (BOM) stated Resident #2 was discharged from Part A with three (3) skilled benefit days remaining; the BOM stayed Resident #2 stayed in the facility. The BOM acknowledged Resident #2 should have received a SNF ABN. On 3/13/13 at 3:35 p.m., the BOM provided an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure one (1) of 33 residents had orders, at the time of admission, to guide care (Resident #46). The findings include: Resident #46 was documented as being readmitted to the facility on [DATE] at 4:35 p.m. Resident #46 was transported via ambulance to a local emergency department on 2/16/23 at 11:56 a.m. The facility staff failed to promptly obtain wound care and medication orders, for Resident #46, at the time of the readmission. Resident #46's minimum data assessment (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/15/22, was dated as being completed on 12/29/22. Resident #46 was documented as never or rarely able to understand others and as never or rarely able to make self understood. Resident #46 was documented as being totally dependent on others for eating, bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #46's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: hemiplegia/hemiparesis, seizure disorder, irregular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 33 residents, Resident #4. The findings included: For Resident #4 the facility staff failed to properly code a wound on the MDS. Resident #4's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to multiple sclerosis, depression, anxiety, and contractures of muscles. The most recent MDS with an assessment reference date of 02/06/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Section M, skin conditions, subsection M1040, other ulcers, wounds and skin problems coded the resident as none of the above present. This subsection includes surgical wounds. Resident #4's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained care plans for Resident at nutrition risk r/t (related to) . Wounds: Surgical PI Open wound to R (right) hip skin fold, healing .and . is at risk for continuing impaired skin integrity related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to initiate a care plan within 48 hours that addressed the resident's clinical needs for 2 of 33 residents, Resident #36 and #149 1. For Resident #36, facility staff failed to implement a baseline care plan to address the resident's needs as evidenced by failure to address surgical wounds on the care plan within 48 hours of admission. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including (by listed date of diagnosis) type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, morbid obesity, obstructive sleep apnea,muscle weakness, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, atrial fibrillation, sepsis due to escherichia coli, and bacteremia. On the minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, family interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to initiate interventions to address the resident's wound care needs for 1 of 33 residents reviewed (Resident #149). Resident #149 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic nephropathy, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, asthma, infection following a procedure-superficial incisional surgical site-subsequent encounter, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. The minimum data set assessment (MDS) with the assessment reference date 1/19/2023 was reviewed. The resident scored 13/15 on the brief interview for mental status, and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. The MDS also documented the resident had surgery during the prior 100 days, recent surgery requiring SNF care, infection of the foot, surgical wounds, and surgical wound care. The resident's comprehensive care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered plan of care for 1 of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #299. The findings included: For Resident #299, the facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive person-centered plan of care following the development of a pressure injury. This was a closed record review. Resident #299's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Metabolic Encephalopathy, Aftercare following Joint Replacement Surgery, Dislocation of Internal Right Hip Prosthesis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unspecified Dementia, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The admission minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/25/22 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 9 out of 15 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident was coded as being at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for the notification and assessment of critical laboratory test results for 2 of 33 Residents, Resident #10, and Resident #14 The findings included: 1. For Resident #10 the facility staff failed to notify the provider, assess and/or treat the resident for a critical potassium (K) level and a critical glucose level. Resident #10's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to anemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, basal cell carcinoma of skin, and hypertension. Resident #10's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 02/07/23 coded the resident as 6 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #10's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for Resident is at nutrition risk r/t (related to) need for altered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that admission orders included nutrition and fluid orders for one (1) of 33 residents, Resident #46. Resident #46 received their nutrition and fluids via enteral means. Resident #46 was not able to intake nutrition and/or fluids orally. (Enteral nutrition is a way of providing nutrition, via tube, directly to an individual's stomach or small intestine.) The findings include: Resident #46 was documented as being readmitted to the facility on [DATE] at 4:35 p.m. Resident #46 was transported via ambulance to a local emergency department on 2/16/23 at 11:56 a.m. The facility staff failed to obtain tube feeding orders for Resident #46 during the aforementioned stay at the facility. Resident #46's minimum data assessment (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/15/22, was dated as being completed on 12/29/22. Resident #46 was documented as never or rarely able to understand others and as never or rarely able to make self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and physician's orders for 1 of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #38. The findings included: For Resident #38, the facility staff failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician and according to the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan. Resident #38's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Asthma, and Bipolar Disorder. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/24/22 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 8 out of 15 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #38 was coded as requiring extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident was also coded as receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and document review, the facility staff failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were addressed by a medical provider for three (3) of five (5) residents selected for unnecessary medication review (Resident #14, Resident #17, and Resident #26). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure three (3) of Resident #14's Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were documented and addressed by a medical provider. Resident #14's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/16/22, was dated as being completed on 12/29/22. Resident #14 was assessed as sometimes able to make self understood and as sometimes able to understand others. Resident #14 was assessed as having problems with short-term and long-term memory. Resident #14 was assessed as requiring assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #14's clinical documentation included the same note on the following three (3) dates: (a) 10/25/22; (b) 11/21/22; and (c) 1/26/23. The note read as A medication regimen review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure one out of 21 residents were free from medication errors, Resident #104. The findings included: For Resident #104 the facility staff administered the medications enalapril and metoprolol outside the physician ordered parameters on separate occasions. Enalapril and metoprolol are both medications used to treat high blood pressure. Resident #104's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure). The most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 02/07/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 6 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #104's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for Resident exhibits or is at risk for cardiovascular symptoms or complications related to HTN (hypertension), edema, increasing risk of CVA (cerebrovascular accident [stroke])/kidney disease.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility staff failed to promptly notify a medical provider of Resident #14's critically low blood glucose level. A blood glucose test is a blood test that measures the level of sugar (glucose) in the blood. Low blood sugar (also called hypoglycemia) has many causes, including missing a meal, taking too much insulin, taking other diabetes medicines, exercising more than normal, and drinking alcohol. Blood sugar below 70 mg/dL is considered low . Low blood sugar can be dangerous and should be treated as soon as possible. (Downloaded from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/managing/manage-blood-sugar.html on 3/16/23) Resident #14's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/16/22, was dated as being completed on 12/29/22. Resident #14 was assessed as sometimes able to make self understood and as sometimes able to understand others. Resident #14 was assessed as having problems with short-term and long-term memory. Resident #14 was assessed as requiring assistance with bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility staff failed to discard an out-of-date food item and failed to label opened food items in the refrigerator. The findings include: The facility staff failed to label a bag of shredded cheese that had been opened and failed to discard an opened bottle of Worcestershire Sauce with a use by date of 9/13/22. On 3/12/23 at 2:30 P.M. during the initial tour of the kitchen, surveyor observed an opened, clear bag of shredded cheese with no label or date on it in the walk-in cooler. Other staff member # 3 stated, they just opened that the other day, we go through cheese fast. Surveyor asked if the bag should have a label on it and they stated that it should have a date on it when it was opened. Surveyor then observed a large, opened bottle of Worcestershire Sauce with a use by date of 9/13/22. Other staff #3 stated, I didn't even know that was in here, I'll throw it away. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain complete and/or accurate clinical record/documentation for four of 21 sampled residents, Resident #103, Resident #108, Resident #117, and Resident #106. The findings were: 1. The facility staff failed to document Resident #103's dressing changes accurately. Resident #103's minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 02/01/2023 coded the resident as a 14 out of 15 in the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score in Section C - cognitive patterns. Resident #103 required assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene as coded in Section G (Functional Status). Resident #103's clinical record contained a provider order dated 05/04/23 for wound care/surgical incision right below knee amputation (BKA): cleanse with inhouse wound cleanser (IHWC), pat dry, cover small open area with xeroform, then with non-stick telfa and ABD pad. Secure with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a Quality Assurance and Performance (QAPI) Program to meet the needs of the facility as evidenced by repeated deficiencies in the area of Quality of Care related to wound management. The findings included: Quality of Care was previously cited with the 2/21/20 and 5/20/21 Medicare/Medicaid standard surveys for failing to follow physician's orders in regard to treatment administration and/or wound care. On 3/20/23 at 12:29 pm, surveyor met with the administrator and discussed the facility QAPI Program. The administrator stated the QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) Committee met monthly and consisted of the administrator, director of nursing, interdisciplinary team members, the infection preventionist, and the medical director. The administrator stated the medical director attended at least quarterly and often additional staff members attended. The administrator stated QAA Committee information was entered into a computer system and accessible by the facility governing body. Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene after cleaning the wound and placing a clean dressing for 1 of 33 residents in the survey sample, Resident #36. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including (by listed date of diagnosis) type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy,peripheral vascular disease, morbid obesity, obstructive sleep apnea,muscle weakness, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, atrial fibrillation, sepsis due to escherichia coli, bacteremia. On the minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 2/1/23, the resident scored 14/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. The surveyor interviewed the resident on 3/12/23 concerning life in the facility. The resident had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, employee record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to obtain verification of licensure from the Department of Health Professions prior to hire for 2 (Employees # 15 and # 24) of 5 Registered Nurses, for 1 (Employee # 13) of 5 Licensed Practical Nurses and the facility staff failed to ensure a criminal background check was obtained timely for 1 (Employee # 26) of 27 employees in the Employee Records Check sample. The Findings included: 1. For Employee # 15, the facility staff failed to obtain licensure verification prior to hire. On 5/19/2021- 5/20/2021, review of employee records was conducted. Review of the personnel file for Employee # 15 was conducted and revealed Employee # 15 was hired on 9/28/2020 as a Registered Nurse, Unit Manager. Employee # 15's Registered Nurse license was not verified by the facility staff with the Department of Health Professions until 5/19/2021 at 13:23 (1:23 p.m.), during the survey. . On 5/20/2021 at 3:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Human Resources Director who confirmed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    19. For Resident 196, the facility staff failed to administer a PPD per the physicians orders. A (PPD) purified protein derivative skin test is a test that determines if you have (TB) tuberculosis. The face sheet in Resident 196 clinical record included the diagnosis degenerative diseases of basal ganglia, hemiplegia, epilepsy, and hypertension. Resident 196 was a new admit and had no completed MDS assessment. Resident 196 was unable to communicate with the surveyor. Resident 196's (EHR) electronic health record included an order dated 05/06/2021 for tuberculin PPD solution inject 0.1 ml intradermally one time only for screening. This was a verbal order that had been confirmed by the (DON) director of nursing. 05/08/2021 the nursing staff documented that they would obtain information regarding the residents previous PPD from another nursing facility. This information was not obtained and the PPD was not administered. The facility staff administered the PPD on 05/10/2021. The facility nursing staff failed to read the results. The facility policy titled, 20.2 Tuberculosis Screening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, and during the course of a complaint investigation, facility staff failed to inform the resident's responsible party and physician of a change in skin status for 1 complaint resident (Resident #246). The findings were: 1. For Resident #246, facility staff failed to immediately notify the resident's responsible party (RP) and physician when there was a change in the resident's mid back skin integrity. Resident #246 diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbance, transient ischemic attack (TIA - mini stroke) and cerebral infarction (stroke), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), and hemiplegia (severe loss of strength on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (mild or partial weakness of one side of the body). On the minimum data set assessment (MDS) with assessment reference date (ARD) 12/02/2020, Section G (Functional Status) noted the resident was totally dependent and required two + person physical assist for transfers. For bed mobility, the resident required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, and clinical record review, facility staff failed to determine that an assessment needed to completed for a significant change regarding the development of what was stated to be a deep tissue injury for 1 of 12 residents in the survey sample (Resident #6). The findings were: 1. For Resident #6, Facility staff failed to assess skin condition and to treat what was stated to be a deep tissue injury at a pressure point on the resident's left heel. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Type 1 diabetes mellitus, traumatic brain injury, history of falls, major depression, convulsions, polyneuropathy, pain in knee and hip, and hypertension. During the initial contact on 5/18/21, the surveyor asked the resident if there were any wounds or skin injuries. The resident showed the surveyor a blackened place on the left side of the left heel that was nickel-sized blackened skin with a distinct reddened border. It was the size and in the location where the resident's foot rested on the mattress. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, and clinical record review during review of a complaint, facility staff failed to provide necessary care and services for prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers for 1 of 12 residents in the survey sample (Resident #246). The findings were: 1. The facility staff failed to prevent Resident #246 from developing a pressure ulcer to his mid back. Resident #246 diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbance, transient ischemic attack (TIA - mini stroke) and cerebral infarction (stroke), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), and hemiplegia (severe loss of strength on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (mild or partial weakness of one side of the body). On the minimum data set assessment (MDS) with assessment reference date (ARD) 12/02/2020, Section G (Functional Status) documented the resident was totally dependent and required two + person physical assist for transfers. For bed mobility, the resident required extensive assistance by two + persons physical assist. This MDS did not have a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and the review of documents, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's respiratory/oxygen equipment was appropriately changed for one (1) of 15 sampled residents (Resident #40). The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #40's tracheostomy oxygen collar and oxygen humidification device was appropriately changed. Resident #40 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/5/21, was signed as completed on 5/12/21. Resident #40 was assessed as being usually able to make self understood and as being usually able to understand others. Resident #40's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score was documented as five (5) out of 15. Resident #40 was documented as requiring assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #40's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: heart failure, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, dementia, kidney disease, and lung disease. On the afternoon of 5/18/21, Resident #40's oxygen administration equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the review of documents, and during the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure the competition of orientation was documented for a staff member (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #21) prior to the staff member being scheduled to work independently. The findings include: The facility staff failed to have documentation to show LPN #21's completion of the facility's orientation process prior to LPN #21 being scheduled to work independently. The facility's administrative team was asked for policies and procedures for new LPN orientation. On 5/20/21 at 9:21 a.m., the Administrator provided a document titled NURSING ORIENTATION ROADMAP. This document indicated a nurse would receive between 40 - 120 ours of orientation time depending on their amount of previous long-term care experience. This document did not address how completion of LPN orientation would be documented. The Administrator reported no additional policies and/or procedures related to orientation was found. On 5/20/21 at 9:25 a.m., the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$159,612 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $12,698 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
  • $133,517 — penalty dated 2024-08-21
  • $13,397 — penalty dated 2023-10-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.5-2.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS VA HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/30/2025
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
SANDERS, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2025
TOMPKINS, PAULIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 20%Other / private 24%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$373per resident / day
operating cost
$11,329per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$339per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495200. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next