Woodmont Center
11 Dairy Lane, Fredericksburg, VA 22405 · For profit - Corporation · 118 certified beds · (540) 371-9414 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (75) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $75,712 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-27)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.4% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 1.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.7% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 3.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.7% | 15.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.3% | 20.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.4% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.3% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.0% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.1% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.8% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.2% | 22.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.7% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.02 | 1.52 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.53 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 198 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.2%CMS range 43.4–58.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.2%CMS range 10.2–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.8–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 94.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.90 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.06 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
75 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 64 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions for the prevention of falls for two of 10 residents in the survey sample, Resident #3 and Resident #9. Resident #3 was assisted by one staff member on 9/24/23 at 2:00 a.m. Resident #3 was turned over in bed and rolled off the bed, suffering a right distal femoral fracture on the leg with a below the knee amputation, thus causing harm to the resident. The findings include: 1. For Resident #3 (R3), the facility staff failed to use two people to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care, per the care plan and CNA (certified nursing assistant) Kardex, resulting in the resident falling out of bed and suffering a right distal femoral fracture on the leg with a below the knee amputation. Additionally, the facility staff failed to provide evidence that a thorough investigation of the fall with serious injury. Resident #3 (R3) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for nine of 50 residents in the survey sample, Residents #6, #18, #4, #2, #5, #43, #67, #77 and #96. The findings include: 1. For Resident #6 (R6), facility staff failed to follow the comprehensive care plan for the use of non-pharmacological interventions. R6 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but not limited to lower back pain. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 04/05/2026, R6 scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R6 was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section J Health Conditions coded R6 as having frequent pain with a pain level of eight out of ten, with ten being the worse pain. The physician's orders for R6 documented in part, Acetaminophen (1) Tablet 325 MG…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and responsible party interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care to dependent residents for five of 50 residents in the survey sample, Residents #96, #77, #5, #43 and #105.The findings include:1. For Resident #96 (R96), the facility staff failed to provide showers twice a week during 6/1/2025-6/30/2025, and 7/1/2025-7/31/2025. On the most recent minimum data set (MDS), a significant change assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/2/2025, the resident was assessed as being severely impaired for making daily decisions and requiring partial/moderate assistance for shower/bathing. Review of the ADL documentation for R96 from 6/1/2025-6/30/2025, and 7/1/2025-7/31/2025 documented R96 receiving one shower in June 2025, and five showers in July 2025. The resident census documentation showed R96 out of the facility on 7/8/2025 only. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety on one of six hallways, the Cardinal hallway and in one of one kitchen.The findings include: 1. On 4/21/26 at 11:30 a.m. an observation was conducted in the kitchen with the following findings: a single 9x12 cutting board with dried red colored debris on the edge, two large ladles with draining holes in them with yellow debris and a partial noodle stuck on one of them, two 16x24 baking sheets with white thick debris. On one sheet, the debris was stuck to the front and on the other to the back of the sheet. There were a cake mixer guard and its stand with white debris and the electrical cord was stored inside the mixing bowl. On one four-tiered metal rack where dry dishes were stored there were 3 steam pans stacked varying in size that were wet on the top shelf. The MIT(manager in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) for one of 50 residents, Resident #11.The findings include:For R11, the facility staff failed to offer showers or bed baths.R11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to muscle weakness.On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/19/2026, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating R11 was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Under Section GG Functional Abilities R11 was coded as requiring Partial/moderate assistance for Showering/bathe self.The facility's 200 Wing Shower List revealed R11 was scheduled for showers on Mondays and Thursdays during the 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. shift.The ADL (activities of daily living) sheet for R11 dated March 2026 revealed the following: 03/06/2026 was coded 09 (zero-nine) on the day shift (7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.) 88 on the evening shift (3:00 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a safe environment for one of 50 residents, Residents #49The findings include:The facility failed to provide a safe environment for Resident #49 (R49).Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to DM (diabetes mellitus), Parkinsons Disease, dementia and Adult FTT (failure to thrive). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/25/26, coded the resident as scoring a 04 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section GG-functional abilities and goals coded the resident as being dependent for bed mobility, transfer, hygiene and bathing; supervision for eating.A review of the comprehensive care plan dated 7/23/25, revised on 3/17/26 revealed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for three of ten residents in the survey sample, Resident #3, Resident #1, and Resident #8. The findings include: 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan to utilize two persons for bed mobility, resulting in the resident falling out of the bed and suffering a fracture of the distal right femur of the right below the knee amputation. The comprehensive care plan dated, 9/15/23, and with a readmission date of 9/23/23, documented in part, “Focus: Resident/Patient requires assistance/is dependent for ADL care in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting) related to: Amputation of R (right) BKA (below the knee amputation).” The interventions documented in part, “8/17/23 - Provide resident/patient with extensive assist of 2 for bed mobility.” The CNA Kardex…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for four of ten residents, Residents #5, # 9, #1, and #10. The findings include: 1. For Resident #5 (R5), the facility staff failed to review and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan regarding a fall on 12/13/24. A review of R5's clinical record revealed a nurse's note dated 12/13/24 that documented the resident was observed lying on the floor in the bedroom. Further review of R5's clinical record failed to reveal the resident's comprehensive care plan dated 10/10/23 was reviewed and revised regarding the 12/13/24 fall. On 8/26/25 at 1:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3. LPN #3 stated the purpose of the care plan is to maintain each resident's well-being and safety. LPN #3 stated a resident's care plan should be updated when a resident falls. On 8/26/25 at 4:08 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the administrator) and ASM #2 (the interim director of nursing) were made aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for dependent residents to two of 10 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #2.The findings include:1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care/toileting assistance on multiple dates in December 2024, January 2025 and February 2025. On the most recent MDS, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/9/2025, the resident was assessed as being severely impaired for making daily decisions. R1 was assessed as always being incontinent of bowel and bladder and being dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. Review of the ADL (activities of daily living) documentation for R1 from 12/1/2024-12/31/2024 failed to evidence incontinence care provided on day shift on 12/20/24, 12/23/24, and 12/31/24, on evening shift on 12/12/24, 12/18/24, 12/20/24, and 12/23/24 and on night shift on 12/15/24 and 12/31/24. The dates were blank or documented with “-97”…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens. The findings include:On 08/25/2025 at approximately 1;30 p.m. an observation of the facility's dish room located in the kitchen was conducted with OSM (other staff member) 32, dietary manager. The observation revealed a 17-inch floor fan. Observation of the fan revealed it was sitting on the floor blowing air across the floor on to a rack of clean plate bases and covers. Further observation of the fan revealed the back fan guard with pieces of debris and greasy to the touch. When the observation of the fan as described above was pointed out to OSM #2, he agreed the fan was dirty immediately removed the fan from the dish room. On 08/25/0225 at approximately 4:30 p.m. an observation in the facility's kitchen revealed OSM #3 plating pureed cake into bowls for the resident's desert. Observation of OSM #3 revealed he sported a mustache and a tuff of hair under his lower lip. Further observation failed to evidence a covering over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to promote resident's dignity for one of 10 residents in the survey sample, Resident #8 (R8). The findings include:For R8, the facility staff failed to provide privacy for the catheter collection bag. R8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to urinary retention (1). The admission MDS (minimum data set) was not due at the time of the survey. The facility's Clinical Admission assessment for R8 dated 08/14/2025 documented in part, Level of cognitive impairment: b. alert (some forgetfulness). On 08/25/2025 at approximately 3:47 p.m. observation of the catheter collection bag hanging on lower portion of bed uncovered. Further observation revealed the contents of the collection bag could clearly be seen. On 08/27/2025 at approximately 7:45 p.m. observation of the catheter collection bag hanging on lower portion of bed uncovered. Further observation revealed the contents of the collection bag could clearly be seen. The physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 64 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide accommodation of needs for one of ten residents in the survey sample, Resident #6 (R6). The findings include:For Resident #6 (R6), the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's call bell within reach. On 8/25/25 at 3:37 p.m., R6 was observed lying in bed. The resident stated staff answer the call bell, but this can only happen when the call bell is within reach. R6 further stated the call bell is not always within her reach. At this time, R6's call bell was observed on the floor, out of the resident's reach. On 8/25/25 at 3:41 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1. LPN #1 stated that when a resident is in bed, the call bell should be placed next to him or her or clipped on him or her, so the call bell is within the resident's reach. R6's call bell was observed with LPN #1. LPN #1 stated the call bell was not within R6's reach. On 8/26/25 at 4:08 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the administrator) and ASM #2 (the interim director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party as required for one of 10 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #8 (R8). The findings include:The findings include: For R8, facility staff failed to notify the responsible party (RP) that medication, Daptomycin (1), was not available for administration on 08/15/2025. R8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to left foot infection. The admission MDS (minimum data set) was not due at the time of the survey. The facility's Clinical Admission assessment for R8 dated 08/14/2025 documented in part, Level of cognitive impairment: b. alert (some forgetfulness). The physician's order for R8 documented in part, Daptomycin Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 500 MG (milligram) (Daptomycin). Use 10 ml (milliliter) intravenously (into a vein) one time a day every other day for left foot gangreen [sic] (2) for 23 Days. Order Date Date:8/15/2025. The EMAR (electronic medication administration record) for R8 dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain a clean and comfortable environment for one of ten residents in the survey sample, Resident #4 The findings include: For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's fall mats and floors in a clean and comfortable environment. Observation was made of R4's room on 8/25/25 at 4:02 p.m. The resident was in bed; there were fall mats on both sides of the bed. The fall mats had evidence of liquids having been spilled and the surveyor's shoes stuck to the fall mats. There were bits of paper on both sides of the bed. There were dirt and debris behind the bed and nightstand. On 8/26/25 at 10:59 a.m., an interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #5 (the director of environmental services). OSM #5 stated all resident rooms are cleaned every day. OSM #5 stated that in the morning, the cleaning consists of pulling the trash, cleaning surfaces, sweeping, moping, cleaning the bathroom, and replacing toiletries. OSM #5 stated that later in the day, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence efforts to resolve a grievance for one of ten residents in the survey sample, Resident #1.The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to evidence efforts to resolve a written grievance sent to the former administrator by R1's responsible party in November 2024. This is cited as past non-compliance with a date of compliance of 5/10/2025.A review of the facility grievances from 1/1/2024 to the present documented one grievance dated 4/13/2024 for care concerns. The grievances failed to evidence any concerns from November 2024.On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/9/2025 the resident was assessed as being severely impaired for making daily decisions. The resident was assessed as being dependent on staff for ADLs (activities of daily living).The resident demographic information documented a family member as the responsible party and health care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to submit an MDS (minimum data set) assessment in the required timeframe for one of ten residents in the survey sample, Resident #7.The findings include:For Resident #7 (R7), the facility staff failed to submit the admission MDS assessment within fourteen days of admission.Review of the facesheet for R7 documented an admission date of 8/9/2025.Review of the MDS assessments for R7 documented an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/15/25 in progress. The assessment failed to show a completion or submission date.On 8/26/2025 at 2:33 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #8, MDS coordinator. LPN #8 stated that the admission MDS was completed and submitted before the fourteenth day after admission. She stated that some of the MDS assessments had gotten behind due to staffing issues.According to the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.1 October 2024, documented in part,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff/resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of nine residents in the survey sample, Resident 105 (R105).The findings include: R105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to muscle wasting/atrophy, sacral pressure ulcer and atrial fibrillation. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare 5-day assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/8/25, coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the MDS Section GG-functional abilities and goals coded the resident as requiring max assist for bathing/transfer/dressing/toileting and supervision for eating; Section H-Bladder and Bowel, H0100. Appliances- A. Indwelling catheter was coded as 'yes'. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for two of 10 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2 (R2) and R7. The findings include:1. For R2, facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for oral hygiene. R2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to muscle weakness. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a 5 (five)-Day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 02/12/2024, R2 scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The baseline care plan for R2 dated 02/09/2024 documented, “Focus: Resident has COVID 19 (coronavirus disease 2019) infection. Date Initiated: 02/09/2024. Created on: 02/09/2024.; Resident/Patient requires assistance/is dependent for mobility related to: Date Initiated: 02/09/2024. Created on: 02/09/2024.” On 08/27/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services to promote healing of a pressure injury for two of 10 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #7.The findings include:1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to provide pressure injury (1) treatment as ordered for dates in January and February 2025.On the most recent MDS, a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/9/2025, the resident was assessed as being severely impaired for making daily decisions. R1 was assessed as having one Stage II pressure injury and two unstageable pressure injuries.The physician orders for R1 documented in part,- Venelex External Ointment (Balsam Peru Castor Oil) Apply to sacrum topically every day and evening shift for wound to sacrum. Start Date: 11/22/2024.- Calcium Alginate-Silver External Pad 4 (Calcium Alginate-Silver) Apply to Left Gluteus topically every day shift for Wound.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and clinical record review, facility staff failed to provide care and services for an indwelling catheter for one of ten residents in the survey sample, Resident #8 (R8). The findings include:For R8, the facility staff failed to keep the catheter collection bag (1) off the floor. R8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to urinary retention (2). The admission MDS (minimum data set) was not due at the time of the survey. The facility's Clinical Admission assessment for R8 dated 08/14/2025 documented in part, Level of cognitive impairment: b. alert (some forgetfulness). On 08/26/2025 at approximately 8:18 a.m. observation of R8's catheter collection bag revealed it was lying flat on the floor next to R8's bed. The physician's order for R8 documented, Indwelling catheter (3)16FR (French) with 10cc (cubic centimeter) balloon to bedside straight drainage for diagnosis/Hx (history) of urinary retention. Order Date Date:8/14/2025. The comprehensive care plan for R8 dated 08/19/2025 documented in part, Focus. Resident requires…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one of ten residents in the survey sample, Resident #1.The findings include:For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate medical record.Review of R1's clinical record documented a discharge date of [DATE].The progress notes for R1 documented in part,- [DATE] 07:40 Note : Significant change to reflect hospice closed due to resident death on 2/21.- [DATE] 20:15 (8:15 p.m.) Date of Service: 2025-03-12, Visit Type: Advanced care planning, Details: Chief complaint: ACP (advanced care planning) discussion w/ RP (responsible party), daughter in presence of DON (director of nursing) as res (resident) continues to decline. Res is seen for overall decline in condition and has been hospitalized 5 times this year for various issues of PVD (peripheral vascular disease), anemia, AMS (altered mental status), wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store, prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner in one of one facility kitchens and two of two facility unit pantries. The findings include: On 1/23/23 at 10:45 AM the kitchen tour was conducted with OSM #1 (Other Staff Member), the dietary manager. The following items were identified: 1. In the dry storage area: trash was on the floor, a plastic cup was on the floor, the floor was sticky, a dry cereal bag was open and exposed. 2. In the refrigerator: A facility generic plastic storage container of fudge was observed and expired on 1/13/23. A block of cheese in a plastic bag, was not sealed. 3. Equipment: The large standing mixer was clean and ready for use, and covered by a plastic bag, however crumbs were in the mixer bowl. 4. In the 2 facility unit pantries: The refrigerators and freezers were dirty, with dripped, sticky food residue. On 1/24/23 at 8:24 AM, an interview was conducted with OSM #1. She stated that the dietary staff are going to clean the unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for 4 of 29 residents in the survey sample; Residents #47, #43, #4, and #51. The findings include: 1. For Resident #47, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan to ensure that physician-ordered fall mat(s) were in place. A review of the physician's orders revealed one dated 5/11/22 for Floor mat while in bed. A review of the comprehensive care plan revealed one dated 3/7/22 for Resident has had actual fall and is at risk for further falls r/t (related to) cognitive loss, lack of safety awareness, Impaired mobility, impulsivity. This care plan included an intervention dated 3/7/22 for Fall mat(s) Indicate Number/side(s). Observations of Resident #47 on 1/23/23 at 12:29 PM and 2:04 PM and on 1/24/23 at 11:15 AM, all revealed Resident #47 in the bed. There were no fall mats down and no evidence of fall mats present in the room for Resident #47. On 1/24/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for three of 29 residents in the survey sample, Residents #49, #11 and #78. The findings include: 1. a. For Resident #49 (R49), the facility staff failed to review and revise the resident's comprehensive care plan after R49 inappropriate touched a female resident's breast. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change in status assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/5/22, the resident scored 10 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A nurse's note dated 9/25/22 documented a CNA (certified nursing assistant) observed R49 inappropriately touch a female resident's breast. R49's comprehensive care plan dated 11/11/19 failed to reveal documentation that the care plan was reviewed and revised regarding the event. On 1/24/23 at 3:36 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to periodically review advance directives for two of 29 residents in the survey sample, Residents #51 (R51) and #2 (R2). The findings include: 1. For R51, the facility staff failed to review information for formulating an advance directive with the resident and/or responsible party. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 12/25/2022, the resident was coded being moderately impaired for making daily decisions. The physician order dated, 12/21/2022, documented, Full Code. The Social Services Assessment and Documentation dated, 11/02/2021, 2/2/2022, 4/29/2022, 5/13/2022, 7/17/2022, and 8/4/2022, documented the following: Patient/resident responsible for self - yes Power of Attorney - Financial - no Conservatorship - no Court-appointed Guardian - no Advance Directives (Living Will, Healthcare Power of Attorney or Healthcare Proxy) in place? - no Additional Conversation regarding advance care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a significant change in health for one of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #49. The findings include: For Resident #49 (R49), the facility staff failed to notify the resident's physician of a significant weight loss in December 2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change in status assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/5/22, the resident scored 10 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A review of R49's clinical record revealed the resident weighed 173.2 pounds on 11/5/22 and 163 pounds on 12/2/22 which indicated a 5.89% loss. An assessment signed by the former RD (registered dietitian) on 12/2/22 documented, Resident triggered for -5.8% weight loss x1 month. Per unit manager, last month resident was not getting out of bed or eating very much. Resident is now at baseline, getting out of bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the facility abuse policy for reporting the final results of an allegation of abuse to the State Agency (SA) for one of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #11. The findings include: For Resident #11, the facility staff failed to implement the facility abuse policy for reporting the final results of an allegation of sexual abuse by another resident on 9/24/22. The facility abuse policy documented, 8.2 Report findings of all completed investigations within five (5) working days to the Department of Health . On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/7/22, the resident scored 5 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A nurse's note dated 9/24/22 documented a CNA (certified nursing assistant) observed a male resident inappropriately touching R11's body. An initial report regarding this event…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to report the final results of an allegation of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within 5 working days, for one of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #11. The findings include: For Resident #11, the facility staff failed to report the final results of an allegation of sexual abuse by another resident on 9/24/22 to the State Agency. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/7/22, the resident scored 5 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A nurse's note dated 9/24/22 documented a CNA (certified nursing assistant) observed a male resident inappropriately touching R11's body. An initial report regarding this event was submitted to the SA on 9/24/22. The report documented a CNA observed a male resident touching R11's breast area. On 1/24/23 at 12:29 p.m., ASM (administrative staff member) #1 (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence that bed hold notification was provided when two out of 29 residents in the survey sample were transferred to the hospital; Resident #18 and Resident #11. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence provision of bed hold notification at the time of discharge for Resident #18. Resident #18 was transferred to the hospital on 9/29/22 and 11/12/22. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/1/22, coded the resident as scoring a 11 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. There was no evidence of bed hold documentation provided to the resident or the resident's responsible party (RP) when the resident was sent to the hospital on 9/29/22 or 11/12/22. On 1/24/23 at 2:30 PM, LPN (licensed practical nurse) #3, the unit manager, stated there were no bed holds for this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for an indwelling urinary catheter (1) for one of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #245 (R245). The findings include: For (R245) the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan to address the care and service for an indwelling urinary catheter. (R245) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to benign prostatic hyperplasia (2). The most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment was not due at the time of the survey. The facility's nurse's note for (R245) dated 12/27/2022 documented in part, .admitted from (Name of Hospital) .Resident has an indwelling foley catheter 20 fr (French). On 01/23/23 at approximately 1:52 p.m., an observation of (R245) revealed they that they were lying in bed and had an indwelling urinary catheter in place. 01/24/23 at approximately 8:31 a.m., an observation of (R245) revealed they that they were lying in bed and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain weights as ordered for one of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #11. The findings include: The facility staff failed to follow physician orders for a weights to be obtained on admission [DATE]), for Resident #11. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: pulmonary edema, congestive heart failure and dementia. A review of the comprehensive care plan with a revision date of 1/10/23, revealed, FOCUS: Resident exhibits or is at risk for cardiovascular symptoms or complications related to CVA (cerebrovascular disease), CAD (coronary artery disease), HTN (hypertension), MI (myocardial infarction). Needs stents for blocked artery. INTERVENTIONS: Monitor weight as ordered. A review of the physician orders dated 1/10/23, revealed, Weigh on admission, the next day, then on Mondays for 4 weeks,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement physician-ordered fall interventions per the plan of care for one of 29 residents in the survey sample; Resident #47. The findings include: For Resident #47, the facility staff failed to ensure fall mat(s) were in place per the physician's order. A review of the physician's orders revealed one dated 5/11/22 for Floor mat while in bed. Observations of Resident #47 on 1/23/23 at 12:29 PM and 2:04 PM and on 1/24/23 at 11:15 AM, all revealed Resident #47 in the bed. There were no fall mats down and no evidence of fall mats present in the room for Resident #47. A review of the comprehensive care plan revealed one dated 3/7/22 for Resident has had actual fall and is at risk for further falls r/t (related to) cognitive loss, lack of safety awareness, Impaired mobility, impulsivity. This care plan included an intervention dated 3/7/22 for Fall mat(s) Indicate Number/side(s). On 1/24/23 at 11:15 AM an interview was conducted with LPN #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services for an indwelling urinary catheter (1) for one of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #245 (R245). The findings include: For (R245) the facility staff failed to the facility staff failed to keep the catheter collection bag (2) off the floor and failed to place the catheter collection bag below the level of the bladder. (R245) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses included but were not limited to benign prostatic hyperplasia (3). The most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment was not due at the time of the survey. The facility's nurse's note for (R245) dated 12/27/2022 documented in part, .admitted from (Name of Hospital) .Resident has an indwelling foley catheter 20 fr (French). On 01/23/23 at approximately 1:52 p.m., an observation of (R245's) catheter collection bag revealed that it was resting on the floor. On 01/24/23 at approximately 8:31 a.m., an observation revealed (R245) lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services per physician's order, for one of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. The findings include: For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff failed to administer oxygen at the physician prescribed rate of four liters per minute. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change in status assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/25/22, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. R4's comprehensive care plan dated 10/20/22 documented, Resident exhibits or is at risk for respiratory complications related to hx (history) of acute hypoxic respiratory failure. O2 (Oxygen) as ordered via nasal cannula . Further review of R4's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 12/23/22 for continuous oxygen at four liters per minute via nasal cannula. On 1/23/23 at 11:38 a.m. and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide food to accommodate a resident's preferences for one of 29 residents in the survey sample, Resident #43. The findings include: For Resident #43 (R43), the facility staff failed to provide an egg salad sandwich as listed on the resident's meal ticket during lunch on 1/23/23. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/17/22, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. On 1/23/23 at 11:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with R43. R43 stated they are served items like red meat that they are not supposed to have due to a diagnosis of pancreatitis, and are not served the items listed on the meal ticket that is served with the meal tray. On 1/23/23 at 12:33 p.m., R43's meal tray was observed. The meal ticket documented an egg salad sandwich was to be on the tray; however,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, facility document review and employee record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence maintenance of required certification for one of 25 employee record reviews. The facility staff failed to provide the evidence of required certification for one CNA (certified nursing assistant) that was hired within the last two years, CNA #2. The findings include: On 1/24/23 at 1:10 PM a review of nursing staff licenses and certifications was conducted an revealed that CNA #2 with a date of hire of 3/1/22 did not have their certification verified through the Department of Health Professions (DHP) until 1/23/23. OSM (other staff member) #2, the workforce manager stated there was no other certification pulled in her file until yesterday, when it was pulled [verified]. On 1/24/23 at 4:35 PM, ASM (administrative staff member) #1, the administrator, ASM #2, the director of nursing and ASM #3, the market clinical lead was made aware of the findings. According to the facility's Licensure and Certification of Personnel policy revised 7/1/22, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 29 residents in the survey sample; Resident #78. The findings include: For Resident #78, the facility staff failed to document the event details (where, how, why) of a fall on 12/14/22. A review of the clinical record revealed the following notes: 12/14/22: An SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) note documented that the resident had a fall. The form documented the resident had no pain and no changes in skin (for possible injuries) by checking off a box next to pain (no) and a box under skin next to no skin changes. However, there was no documentation that described the events of the fall (where, how, why). The section for Appearance: Summarize your observations and evaluation was left blank. In addition, the section Nursing Notes was left blank. On 1/24/23 at 2:15 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN #2 (Licensed Practical Nurse) She stated that a note should be documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide written notification to the resident and/or resident representative and ombudsman, upon transfer to the hospital for eight of 31 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #29, Resident #38, Resident #26, Resident #25, Resident #43, Resident #71, Resident #91 and Resident #81). The facility staff failed to evidence that a written notification was provided to the resident and or the resident representative and ombudsman upon hospital transfers for Resident #29, Resident #38, Resident #26, Resident #25, Resident #43, Resident #71, Resident #91 and Resident #81 The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide Resident # 29 and Resident # 29's representative and the ombudsman written notification of a facility-initiated transfer on 04/05/2021 for Resident # 29. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29's diagnoses included but were not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-18 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a written bed hold notice prior to an or upon a facility initiated transfer for eight of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #29, Resident #38, Resident #26, Resident #25, Resident #43, Resident #71, Resident #91 and Resident #81. The findings include: 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29's diagnoses included but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus (inability of insulin to function normally in the body) (1), end stage renal disease (end stage of renal failure-inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes and function in the maintenance of electrolyte balance) (2) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic, non-reversible lung disease) (3). Resident #29's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 6/4/21, coded the resident as scoring 07 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for four of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 68, #252, #250 and # 92. The findings include: 1. The facility staff implemented bed rails for Resident #68 without a documented need and failed to obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: fracture of hip, high blood pressure and diabetes. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/16/2021, coded Resident #68 as scoring a 12 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately impaired to make daily cognitive decisions. In Section G the resident was coded for bed mobility as the activity did occur but only once or twice with the assistance of two or more staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store food in a sanitary manner. The facility staff failed to discard two (five pound) plastic containers of low fat cottage cheese with a manufacturer's best if used by date of 7/31/21, failed to cover and label a metal pan of mixed vegetables with broccoli, cauliflower and carrots, and failed to ensure a scoop was not stored in a bin of flour. The findings include: On 8/16/21 at 10:35 a.m., a tour of the facility kitchen was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #1 (dietary manager. The following was observed: -In the walk in refrigerator: two (five pound) plastic containers of low fat cottage cheese with a manufacturer's best if used by date of 7/31/21. -In the walk in freezer: a metal pan of mixed vegetables with broccoli, cauliflower and carrots that was not covered or labeled. -In the dry storage room: a scoop sitting in flour within the flour bin. In regards to the cottage cheese, OSM #1 stated he follows manufacturers' best if used by dates and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance program. The findings include: On 08/17/2021 at approximately 8:00 a.m., a review of the facility's QAPI [quality assurance performance improving] Committee Meeting Sign-In Sheets dated October 2020 through December 2020, January 2021 through March 2021 and April 2021 through June 2021 were reviewed. The QAPI sign-in sheets listed above failed to evidence the signature of the facility's medical director. On 08/17/2021 at approximately 9:09 a.m., an interview was conducted with ASM [administrative staff member] # 1, center executive director regarding the missing signature of the medical director for the dates listed above. When asked how the members of the QAPI committee were notified of the meet times and dates, ASM # 1 stated they send out a Zoom invitation [allows you to send invites by email, contact or phone number] to all members. When asked about the missing signature of the medical director, ASM # 1 stated that the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement the facility policies for advanced directives one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #251. The facility staff failed to evidence documentation Resident #251 was provided an opportunity formulate an advance directive and failed to verify the residents wishes with the regards to the residents code status (full code [the decision if the resident would like to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event their heart stops or they stop breathing), or DNR [do not resuscitate]) upon admission. The findings include: Resident #251 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: encephalopathy (any brain disease or disorder.) (1), alcohol use, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (chronic disease condition of the liver in which fibrous tissue and modules replace normal tissue, interfering with blood flow and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan to address physician ordered antianxiety medication for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #252. The findings include: Resident #252 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - general term for chronic, nonreversible lung disease that is usually a combination of emphysema and chronic bronchitis) (1), lung cancer, high blood pressure and diabetes. A MDS (minimum data set) assessment had not yet been completed prior to and during the time of survey. The Nursing Documentation dated 8/10/2021 at 9:17 p.m. documented in part, Reason for note: admission/readmission. Under question 3. Additional details about the note, the following was documented, Pt (patient) is A&O (alert and oriented) X4 (person, place time and situation). The form further documented,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for three of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents #81, #250 and #252. The facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive pain care plans for Residents #81, #250 and #252. The facility staff failed to assess the pain location, intensity and pain level rating and failed to attempt/ provide non-pharmacological pain interventions prior to administering physician prescribed as needed pain medications to Residents: #81, #250 and #252. The findings include: 1. Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: anemia (condition in which the hemoglobin content of the blood is below normal limits) (1), diabetes, high blood pressure, congestive heart failure (abnormal condition characterized by circulatory congestion and retention of salt and water by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents #30 and #87. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #30's comprehensive care plan when the resident fell on 6/8/21, 7/17/21 and 8/3/21. The findings include: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #30's diagnoses included but were not limited to high blood pressure, major depressive disorder and muscle weakness. Resident #30's quarterly minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/2/21, coded the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making as severely impaired. Review of Resident #30's clinical record revealed the resident sustained falls without injury on 6/8/21, 7/17/21 and 8/3/21. Interventions were implemented to prevent future falls. Review of Resident #30's comprehensive care plan initiated on 2/1/21 failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, and during the course of a complaint investigation it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure the provision of care per professional standards for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #81. The facility staff failed obtain physician orders for treatment of Resident #81's left ankle pressure injury for prior to performing the treatment. The findings include: Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: anemia (1), diabetes, high blood pressure, congestive heart failure (2), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (3), and leukemia (4). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 8/7/2021, coded the resident as scoring a 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was capable of making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection of pressure injuries for one of 31 residents in the survey sample, Resident #81. A. The facility staff failed to administer treatment to Resident #81's pressure injuries in a manner to prevent infection, and performed dressing changes to a pressure injury without a physician order. B. The facility staff failed to administer treatments per the physician order for Resident #81. The findings include: A. Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: anemia (1), diabetes, high blood pressure, congestive heart failure (2), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (3), and leukemia (4). The most recent MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for three of 31 residents, Resident #19, Resident #25 and Resident #252. The facility staff failed to store Resident #19 and Resident #25's nasal cannula oxygen tubing in a sanitary manner when not in use, Resident #19's and #25's nasal cannula oxygen tubing laying over the oxygen concentrators uncovered when not in use and the facility staff administered oxygen to Resident #252 without a physician's order. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #19's nasal cannula tubing was stored in a sanitary manner when not in use. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #19's diagnoses included but were not limited to: congestive heart failure (circulatory congestion characterized by circulatory congestion and retention of salt and water by the kidneys) (1),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure implementation of a complete pain management program for three of 31 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 252, # 81, and # 250. The facility staff failed to assess the location of pain, pain level/intensity and failed to attempting/ offering non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering as needed narcotic pain medications to Resident #252, #81 and #250 on multiple dates in August 2021. The findings include: 1. Resident #252 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - general term for chronic, nonreversible lung disease that is usually a combination of emphysema and chronic bronchitis) (1), lung cancer, high blood pressure and diabetes. There was no MDS (minimum data set) assessment completed during the time of survey. The Nursing Documentation dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide dialysis services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of 31 residents, Resident #29 and Resident #38. The facility staff failed to evidence of ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for eight dialysis dates during May, June, and July 2021, for Resident #29 and for six dialysis dates during May and June 2021, for Resident #38. The findings include: 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29's diagnoses included but were not limited to: diabetes mellitus (inability of insulin to function normally in the body) (1), end stage renal disease (end stage of renal failure-inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes and function in the maintenance of electrolyte balance) (2) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic, non-reversible lung disease) (3). Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure one of 31 residents was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications, Resident #252. There was no documentation as to why the medication Ativan was administered and no documentation any non-pharmacological interventions were attempted or provided prior to the administration of the medication to Resident #252. The findings include: Resident #252 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - general term for chronic, nonreversible lung disease that is usually a combination of emphysema and chronic bronchitis) (1), lung cancer, high blood pressure and diabetes. A MDS (minimum data set) assessment had not yet been completed during the time of survey. The Nursing Documentation dated 8/10/2021 at 9:17 p.m. documented in part, Reason for note: admission/readmission. Under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-02-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the dumpster area in a sanitary manner. The facility staff failed to close the sliding doors on the facility's two dumpsters and maintain the area behind the dumpsters free of trash. The findings include: On 02/05/19 at 2:27 p.m., an observation of the facility's dumpsters was conducted with OSM (other staff member) # 7, dining services manager and OSM # 1, director of environmental services. The facility had two dumpsters located behind the facility on a concrete pad. Behind the dumpsters was a lawn area with small shrubs. Observation of both dumpsters revealed one sliding door located on the side was open on each dumpster. Further observation of the lawn area behind the two dumpsters revealed the following: approximately three old clear plastic trash bags, approximately four soda cans and bottles, a clear old plastic trash bag hanging from a branch in one of the shrubs. Approximately 24 plastic bowl covers, numerous pieces of paper, several Styrofoam cups, several plastic spoons…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a dignified dining experience for fifteen of 55 residents in the survey sample; Residents #74, #13, #34, #62, #500, #36, #59, #49, #48, #55, #33, #24, #8, #40, and #61. 1. The facility staff failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Residents #74, #13, #34, #62, #500, #36, #59, #49, #48, #55, and #33. Residents were observed sitting at three tables in the small café dining room without food while another resident at the table was served their meal and eating. 2. The facility staff failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Resident #8 and Resident #24. The facility staff failed to address Resident #97's loud cursing at staff for approximately 29 minutes, during which time Resident #8 and #24 both expressed a dislike of Resident #97's cursing. 3. The facility staff failed to serve Resident #40 lunch on 2/5/19 at the same time her roommate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and implement the comprehensive care plan for eight of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #50, #52, #97, #7, #99, #309, #71, and #29. 1. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan regarding Resident #50's mail delivery. 2. The facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for the administration of oxygen for Resident #52. 3. The facility staff failed to develop a behavior care plan for Resident #97 to address the residents cursing. 4. The facility staff failed to follow Resident # 7's comprehensive care plan for the placement of the call bell. 5. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident # 99's tube feeding and tracheostomy care. 6. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident # 309's oxygen. 7. The facility staff failed to implement Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and/or revise the comprehensive care plan for six out of 55 residents in the survey sample; Residents #39, #31, #15, #35, #1, and #309. 1. The facility staff failed to evidence that Resident #39's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and/or revised after a fall on 11/8/18, 12/24/18, 1/1/19, 1/6/19, and 2/3/19. 2. The facility staff failed to evidence that Resident #31's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and/or revised after a fall on 1/18/19. 3. The facility staff failed to evidence that Resident #15's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and/or revised after a fall on 1/28/19. 4. The facility staff failed to evidence that Resident #35's comprehensive care plan was updated to include the resident's behaviors of going on leave of absences from the facility unsupervised, and his non-compliance with returning within the specified 4-hour window as ordered. 5. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders and professional standards of practice for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #71. The facility staff failed to administer the medication Advair to Resident #71 per physician's order on multiple dates in November 2018 and January 2019. The findings include: The facility staff failed to administer the medication Advair (1) to Resident #71 per physician's order on multiple dates in November 2018 and January 2019. Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #71's diagnoses included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2), low back pain and anxiety disorder. Resident #71's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/8/19, coded the resident as being cognitively intact. Review of Resident #71's clinical record revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services for the treatment of a pressure injury for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #29. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #29's pressure injury treatment as prescribed by the physician on multiple dates in October 2018 and November 2018. The findings include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #29's diagnoses included but were not limited to urinary tract infection, arthritis and abnormal posture. Resident #29's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a 30 day Medicare assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/21/18, coded the resident's cognition as moderately impaired. Section G coded Resident #29 as requiring extensive assistance of one staff with bed mobility, toilet use and personal hygiene. Section M coded Resident #29 as having one stage three pressure injury (1) that was present upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that four of 55 residents in the survey sample (Resident #35, 31, #15 and #39) were provided a safe enviorment and adequate supervision to prevent potential accidents, injuries, or harm. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #35 was assessed to determine if the resident was able to go out into the community unsupervised safely, and allowed the resident to have unsupervised, unmonitored leaves of absences, alone, without a friend of family with him, putting him at risk of potential accidents, injuries. Resident #35 was documented as being excessively late returning to the facility at times and did not have a cell phone so the facility could contact him to check on his safety, and was documented as contacting the facility on 2 occasions in which he did not have a ride or money to return to the facility late at night. 2. Resident #31 sustained a fall on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services according to physician's order for four of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1, #51, #52 and #309. 1. The facility staff failed to administer oxygen to Resident #1 at two liters per minute, per physician's order. 2. The staff failed to discontinue Resident #51's oxygen per physician's order. 3. The facility staff failed to provide respiratory services according to the physicians order for Resident #52. 4. The facility staff failed to administer Resident # 309's oxygen according to the physician's orders. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to administer oxygen to Resident #1 at two liters per minute, per physician's order. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included but were not limited to low back pain, bladder cancer and high blood pressure. Resident #1's most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-07 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct annual performance reviews for 10 of 23 CNAs (certified nursing assistants) who were employed for at least one year. The facility staff failed to complete annual performance reviews for CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, CNA #4, CNA #5, CNA #6, CNA #7, CNA #8. CNA #9, and CNA #10. The findings include: On 2/6/19 at approximately 9:00a.m., a request for the annual performance reviews and associated training's for the CNAs was made to ASM (administrative staff member) #2, the nurse executive. On 2/6/19 at 5:30 p.m., a second request made for the annual performance reviews and associated training's for the CNAs to ASM #2, ASM #1, the executive director, and ASM #3, the clinical quality specialist. On 2/7/19 at 9:41 a.m., ASM #2 informed this surveyor that the facility could not find any performance reviews. When asked where they would be located, ASM #2 stated in the HR (human resources) files. ASM #2 stated, We searched the files last night and can't find anything. CNA #1 was hired on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review it was determined that the facility staff failed to store, prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner. 1. The facility staff failed to label containers of tartar sauce and sour cream with a use-by date. 2. The facility staff failed to maintain a mixer and meat slicer in a clean and sanitary manner. 3. The facility staff failed to keep used alcohol swabs off the food-preparation sheet pan and place clean soup bowls on a clean surface before serving. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to label containers of tartar sauce and sour cream with a use-by date. On 02/05/19 at 9:15 a.m., an observation of the kitchen was conducted with OSM (other staff member) # 7, dining services manager. Observation of the inside of the reach-in refrigerator revealed a tray with 12 small plastic containers with approximately two ounces of tartar sauce in each container and three plastic containers with approximately two ounces of sour cream in each one. Further observation of the tray of containers failed to evidence a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for four of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #312, # 35, #39 and #31. 1. The facility staff inaccurately documented Resident 312's comprehensive care plan with a diagnosis of dementia. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for the administration of medications to Resident #35. The facility staff documented two medications were administered to Resident #35 at 8:00 p.m., on 8/30/18 and 10/3/18, when the clinical record documented the resident was out of the facility. 3. The facility staff failed to evidence that the clinical record documented the details of Resident #39's fall on 11/8/18, 12/24/18, 1/1/19, 1/6/19, and 2/3/19. 4. The facility staff failed to evidence that the clinical record documented the details of Resident #31's falls on 12/7/18 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide the required annual in-service training's for 10 CNAs (certified nursing assistants) who were employed for at least one year. The facility staff failed to provide the required annual 12 hours and/or dementia management training's for CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, CNA #4, CNA #5, CNA #6, CNA #7, CNA #8, CNA #9, and CNA #10. The findings include: On 2/6/19 at approximately 9:00 a.m., a request was made to administrative staff member (ASM) #2, the nurse executive, for the training transcripts, for all CNAs who were employed at the facility for at least one year. For six of the above listed CNAs, an In-service Record was provided. The following was documented: CNA #2 - last training's completed - 1/5/18 CNA # 3 - last training's completed - 1/5/18 CNA # 1 - last training's completed - 1/8/18 CNA #6 - last training's completed - 1/5/18 CNA # 7 - last training's completed - 1/8/18 CNA # 9 - last training's completed - 1/8/18. There were no training records for CNA #4, CNA #5, CNA #8 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide accommodation of resident needs for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 7. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #7's call bell (a device with a button that can be pushed to alert staff when assistance is needed), was within the resident's reach. The findings include: Resident # 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to lack of coordination, rheumatoid arthritis (1), Alzheimer's disease (2), gastroesophageal reflux disease (3) and hypertension (4). Resident # 7's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 10/20/18, coded Resident # 7 as scoring an eight on the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, eight - being moderately impaired of cognition for making daily decisions. Resident # 7 was coded as requiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to clarify a physician's order for code status for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #26. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #26's current active physician's order form signed by the physician on 2/5/19 contained the resident's code status (whether or not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac arrest). The findings include: Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #26's diagnoses included but were not limited to fractured vertebra, acute kidney failure and urinary tract infection. Resident #26's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a 30 day Medicare assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/25/18, coded the resident's cognition as severely impaired. Review of Resident #26's clinical record revealed a Virginia Department of Health Durable Do Not Resuscitate Order form dated 2/5/18. Resident #26's comprehensive care plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify and consult with the physician regarding a possible need to alter treatment for two of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #71, and #35. 1. The facility staff failed to notify Resident #71's physician when the resident's medication Advair was not administered on multiple dates in November 2018 and January 2019. 2. The facility staff failed to evidence the physician was notified, consulted regarding, the need to administer prescribed medications to Resident #35 late, when the resident returned to the facility late, over an hour past the scheduled time for the 8:00 p.m., administration of two medications on 8/30/18 and 10/3/18. The findings include: 1. Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #71's diagnoses included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2), low back pain and anxiety disorder. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility policy review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure resident mail was received unopened for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #50. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #50 received unopened mail. The findings include: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to: high blood pressure, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (1) and obstructive sleep apnea (2). The most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment, with an assessment reference date of 7/24/18, coded the resident as having a score of 15 of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) indicating the resident was cognitively intact to make daily decisions. On 02/05/19 at approximately 11:09 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #50. Resident #50 was asked if he felt the facility offered him privacy. Resident #50 replied, For the most part. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the facility abuse policy for three of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #3, #261 and #262. 1. The facility staff failed to implement the facility abuse policy for reporting Resident #3's allegation of abuse to the state agency within the required two-hour timeframe. 2. The facility staff failed to implement the facility abuse policy for reporting Resident #261's and Resident #262's allegations of abuse to the SA (state agency) within the required two-hour timeframe. On 9/23/18, Resident #261 reported an allegation of abuse to RN (registered nurse) #11. The allegation was not reported to the SA until 9/24/18. On 9/22/18, Resident #262 reported an allegation of abuse to CNA (certified nursing assistant) #9. The allegation was not reported to the SA until 9/24/18. Both allegations were submitted to the SA in one FRI (facility reported incident) on 9/24/18. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse to the SA (state agency) within a timely manner for three of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #3, #261 and #262. 1. The facility staff failed to report Resident #3's allegation of abuse to the SA within the two-hour timeframe. Resident #3's allegation of abuse was reported to staff on 1/17/19 and was not reported to the SA until 1/18/19. 2. The facility staff failed to report Resident #261's and Resident #262's allegations of abuse to the SA within the two-hour timeframe. Resident #261's allegation of abuse was reported to staff on 9/23/18 and was not reported to the SA until 9/24/18. Resident #262's allegation of abuse was reported to staff on 9/22/18 and was not reported to the SA until 9/24/18. Both allegations were submitted to the SA in one FRI (facility reported incident) on 9/24/18. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to evidence that required documentation was sent with residents to the Hospital at the time of transfer, for three of 55 residents, Residents #208, #90, and #51. 1. The facility staff failed to evidence that Resident #208's comprehensive care plan goals were sent with the resident to the hospital at the time of the facility-initiated transfer on 05/25/2018. 2. The facility staff failed provide required documentation to a receiving provider for Resident #90's facility initiated hospital transfer dated 11/28/18 and 1/5/18. 3. The facility staff failed to provide evidence that all required information (including physician contact information, resident representative contact information, special instructions for ongoing care, advance directives and comprehensive care plan goals) was provided to the hospital staff when Resident #51 was transferred to the hospital on 1/24/19. The Findings Included: 1. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure professional standards for the administration of medications for one resident (Resident #35) in the survey sample of 55 residents. The facility staff failed to evidence the physician was notified, consulted and that orders were obtained to administer two medications late to Resident #35, when the resident returned to the facility late, over an hour past the scheduled time for administering two prescribed medications. The facility staff initialed/documented two 8:00 p.m., schedule medications as administered when the clinical record documented the resident was out of the facility on 8/30 and 10/3/18. The findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to hip fracture, atrial fibrillation, high blood pressure, falls, inguinal hernia, and cardiomyopathy. The most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident, Resident #61, was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications. Resident #61 had a PRN (as-needed) order for Lorazepam (1) more than 14 days old and with no stop date. The Findings Included: Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat/cholesterol in the blood), Anxiety, Alzheimer's disease (2), and Dementia. Resident #61's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was a 14-Day Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/01/2019. Resident #61 was scored as a 5 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severe impairment. Resident #61 was coded as requiring total assistance of two or more people for transfers and toileting; total assistance of one person for ambulation; extensive assistance of two or more people for dressing, and as requiring extensive assistance of one person for eating, bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-02-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to post the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. The facility staff failed to post the total number and the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff each day. The finding include: Observation was made during the initial tour on 2/5/19 at approximately 8:30 a.m., of the staff posting in the lobby of the facility. The form documented the facility name, the census of the building -103, the date - 2/5/19. The form further documented the following: Shift - Day, Evening, Night Licensed nursing staff - Day - 5, Evening - 5, Night - 3. Unlicensed nursing staff - Day - 9, Evening - 8, Night - 5. Observation was made of the staff posting on 2/6/19 at 3:41 p.m. of the staff posting in the lobby of the facility. The form documented the facility name, the census of the building -104, the date - 2/6/19. The form further documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-02-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure food was palatable on one of four units during the lunch meal on 2/5/19. On 2/5/19, the facility staff failed to serve food at a palatable taste and temperature on the [NAME] Unit. The findings include: On 02/05/19 at 11:00 a.m., a group interview was conducted with four residents. Three residents voiced complaints that the food is not always hot. On 02/05/19 at 11:55 a.m., observation was made of the tray line in the kitchen based on a complaint investigation that the food is not always hot. At approximately 1:35 p.m., a test tray consisting of a grilled cheese sandwich, tater tots, mash potatoes, tomato soup and pureed grilled cheese sandwich was placed in the food cart with the lunch trays for residents' and was sent to the [NAME] Unit. This surveyor and OSM (other staff member) #7, dining services manager, followed the food cart. At approximately 1:55 p.m., the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$75,712 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $75,712 — penalty dated 2025-08-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- HCCF MANAGEMENT GROUP XI LLC — investment firm · 10.80% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS VA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC. (PUBLICLY TRADED) | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/29/2025 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2015 |
| THREATT, NICOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/29/2025 |
| TOMPKINS, PAUL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/29/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495246. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-01-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.