No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Columbia Crest Center

1100 East Nelson Road, Moses Lake, WA 98837 · For profit - Corporation · 111 certified beds · (509) 765-6788 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$163,278 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $163,278 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-30)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1550 S Pioneer Way Ste 150 · (509) 793-9780 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
209 E Nelson Rd · (509) 765-5451 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1108 E St Helens Dr · (509) 764-3805 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.8%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.2%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.6%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.3%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.6%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.7%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.2%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.9%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.411.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.161.521.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 190 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.5%CMS range 50.2–65.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 7.2–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.1–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.40
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
59.7%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 111 beds and averages 57.4 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-09)
26
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 58 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their abuse/neglect policies and procedures to identify, prevent, protect, investigate, and report abuse/neglect allegations for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 2, 38, and 62) who had reported allegations of abuse and neglect by filing out grievance forms. Review of the facility's Grievance/Concern forms, dated 06/01/2024 to 11/14/2024, showed 10 additional allegations of abuse/neglect involving 7 of 7 residents (Residents 226, 228, 227, 2, 54, 11, and 40) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility did not have a process to identify allegations of abuse/neglect, that were written as grievances and required thorough and timely investigations. The facility also failed to report the allegations to the State Complaint Resolution Unit (the section of the Department of Social and Health Services that is responsible for processing and initiating an electronic recording of all resident received reports) as required. This failed practice placed other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for 1 of 11 residents (Resident 35) reviewed for neglect. Resident 35 experienced harm when staff failed to provide Resident 35 water when requested, failed to assess skin excoriation (loss of the top layer of the skin and a portion of the middle layer of the skin due to scratching or an injury) to Resident 35's coccyx (tailbone) and perineum (the area between the thighs that marks the approximate lower boundary of the pelvis and is occupied by the urinary and genital ducts and rectum), and administer pain medications as needed at their end of life per Resident 35's advanced directive (a legal document that outlines preferences for medical care in the event you are unable to communicate your wishes). These failed practices placed the residents at risk for dehydration, additional skin breakdown, and continued pain. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from avoidable accident hazards for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for accidents with injury. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for avoidable accidents when Resident 4 experienced actual harm when their fifth toe on their right foot was broken while being pushed in their wheelchair. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a safe smoking area and storage of smoking paraphernalia (items or equipment associated with a particular activity, hobby, or lifestyle) for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 13, 27, and 45) reviewed for safe smoking. The failure to ensure a safe smoking environment and storage of smoking paraphernalia placed the residents at risk for dissatisfaction with their smoking activity experience and injury. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Accidents/Incidents, revised 03/01/2024, showed an accident was defined as any unexpected or unintentional incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure offloading interventions timely to prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure injuries for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 and 3) reviewed for pressure injuries. Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed a facility acquired pressure injury with infection to their coccyx (tailbone) and placed other residents at risk of new or worsening skin impairments. Findings included . Review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (leading expert in pressure injuries/wounds), September 2016 defines pressure injury stages as follows: Stage 1 Pressure Injury has intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness). Stage 2 Pressure Injury is a partial thickness skin loss with exposed dermis (the top inner layers of skin) . Stage 3 Pressure Injury is a full thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) tissue is visible in the ulcer. Slough (dead tissue) and or eschar (dried blood and tissue) may be visible,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with standards of practice regarding thorough/accurate assessments, obtaining a medical evaluation, and implementing preventative measures to prevent the development or worsening of pressure injuries for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 42, 45, and 15), reviewed for pressure injuries. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm to Resident 42 when avoidable, facility acquired pressure ulcers developed, and placed other residents at risk for worsening of pressure injuries, medical complications, and unmet care needs. Findings included . The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), dated 2016, Pressure Ulcer (Injury) Stages included: • Stage I: Intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. The area may be painful, firm, soft, warmer, or cooler as compared to adjacent tissue. May indicate at risk persons. • Stage II: Partial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy services were implemented to prevent avoidable reduction of range of motion (ROM) and mobility for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 39 and 4) reviewed for restorative therapy. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident 39 who developed, right and left leg contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue that leads to muscle stiffening and loss of range of motion of the effected body part)and placed other residents at risk for contractures, decreased mobility, and pain. Findings included . Record review of the facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing, dated 08/07/2023, showed the facility will provide restorative nursing programs for residents who: • .have restorative needs arise during the course of a longer-term stay . • .will benefit from restorative programs • .to help the patient obtain and maintain optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound care practices were maintained in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for wound care. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving inadequate wound care, delays in healing or potential worsening of wounds.Findings included.Revised Code of [NAME] (RCW) 18.79.040 (1)(e), Registered nursing practice means the performance of acts requiring substantial specialized knowledge, judgment, and skill based on the principles of the biological, physiological, behavioral, and sociological sciences in either:The executing of medical regimen as prescribed by a licensed physician and surgeon, dentist, osteopathic physician and surgeon, podiatric physician and surgeon, physician assistant, or advanced registered nurse practitioner.Review of the facility policy, Skin Integrity and Wound Management revised on 09/15/2025 showed Licensed Nurses (LNs) were to follow specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 4 of 4 staff (Staff C, D, E, F) reviewed for abuse allegations, implemented the facility policy for identifying abuse and reporting to the state agency and administrator of an allegation of abuse involving Resident 1. This failure disallowed the facility administration with the ability to protect residents, report to state survey agency (SSA, State Survey Agency- responsible for oversight of Medicare certified Nursing Homes), investigate, and take corrective action. Further, the failure placed residents at risk for further abuse, injury, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated 10/24/2022, showed the following:- the facility prohibited abuse of residents,- employees were designated as mandated reporters and were obliged to immediately report any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a resident,- abuse was defined as the willful infliction of injury, willful…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for allegations of abuse. This failure placed residents at risk for further abuse, injury, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated 10/24/2022, showed the following:- the facility prohibited abuse of residents,- the definition of abuse as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish and the definition of willful means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm,- Physical Abuse included hitting, slapping, pinching and kicking,- the Administrator was responsible for operationalizing policies and procedures that prohibit abuse,- the employee alleged to have committed the act of abuse would be immediately removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 4 staff (staff C, D, E, F) immediately reported suspected abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA, responsible for oversight of Medicare certified nursing homes) and the facility Administrator according to CFR S483.12(c)(1) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse reporting. This failure placed residents at risk for further abuse, potential for harm, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated 10/24/2022, showed the following:- employees were designated as mandated reporters and were obliged to immediately report any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a resident,- anyone who witnessed an incident of suspected abuse, were to tell the abuser to stop immediately and report the incident to their supervisor immediately, regardless of shift worked and the notified supervisor will report the suspected abuse immediately to the Administrator,- immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the opportunity to formulate advanced directives (AD) nor periodically notified of their right to formulate an AD for 3 of 4 residents (Resident 56, 8 and 61) reviewed for AD. This failure denied residents the right to make an informed decision regarding formulation of an AD and placed residents at risk for losing the right to have their preferences and choices honored regarding emergent/end-of-life care. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Health Care Decision Making, dated 06/05/2025, showed that AD were written instructions, such as a living will (a legal document that specifies an individual preferences regarding medical treatment) or durable power of attorney for health care (a document delegating an person that is authorized to make health care decision for you, if your unable to communicate the decisions yourself). The policy showed that facility residents would be provided with written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review, and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR, an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were correct on admission or corrected and updated for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 50, 7 and 35) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs.Finding included.Resident 50Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and anxiety (a feeling of unease, worry, or fear about something that might happen in the future). The 12/22/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 50's cognition was intact and received anti-anxiety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with food preference/substitute meal choices for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 61, 16 and 47) reviewed for dining. This failed practice put residents at risk for decreased intake and nutritional complications.Findings included .Resident 61Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was alert and oriented. Resident 61's meal order was a regular low salt diet. The 11/10/2025 food preferences interview sheet showed the resident preferred whole milk with meals. Resident 61 meal dislikes included fruit juices, oatmeal, hot cereals and cold cereal.to include any type of melon.During an observation and concurrent interview during the lunch meal on 01/07/2026 at 12:30 PM, Resident 61 stated the food has not met their needs and was not satisfying. They were a meat and potato person and did like cottage cheese which they had ordered with each meal. The resident was served a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff maintained components of an infection prevention control program to prevent the development and transmission of infections for, 1) hand hygiene and glove change for 4 of 10 staff (Staff T, V, L, and Q) observed during resident cares and, 2) use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in an enhanced barrier precaution (EBP, indicated with high contact resident care activities with an infection, a long term wound, central line device or colonization [the presence of a bacteria that has not yet started its infection process] of an multi drug resistant organism) rooms for 2 of 5 staff (Staff L and Q) reviewed for infection control. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and transmission of infectious diseases. Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revised 05/01/2025, showed that hand hygiene was to be implemented by all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were educated on the potential risk versus benefits when offering the pneumococcal and influenza immunization (specific vaccines that protects against pneumococcal bacteria and viruses that can lead to lung, nose and throat infections) nor documentation that indicated vaccinations were accepted or refused for 4 of 5 residents (Resident 61, 2, 72 and 35) residents reviewed for immunizations and infection control. This failure placed residents at risk of exposure to contagious diseases without the knowledge of the risk/benefits in order to make an informed decision.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccination, revised 09/13/2024, and Influenza Immunization, revised 12/16/2024 showed the facility would provide its residents with the opportunity to accept or refuse the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, obtain the immunization history of the residents and then offer the appropriate vaccination. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representative were offered/educated on the COVID-19 (an infectious disease causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death) immunization (a specific vaccine for the COVID-19 virus) benefits/risks and potential side effects associated with the COVID-19 vaccine for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 61, 2, 72, 35 and 56) reviewed for immunization status. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of making an uninformed decision and resident contracting the COVID-19 virus.Findings included .Resident 61Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, anxiety and depression. The 10/17/2025 comprehensive assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 58 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents on psychotropic medications (a collective term used for medication classes that affect brain activities associated with mental processes, emotions and behavior, like antipsychotics or anxiolytics) were being monitored for individualized behaviors prior to administration to reflect the adequate need of the medication for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for psychotropic medication side effects. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for experiencing medication-related adverse side effects, and unmet care needs. Finding included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Behaviors: Management of Symptoms, revised 09/15/2025, showed that residents behavioral symptoms would be individually evaluated to identify the underlying causes that may contribute to the resident's behavior. The policy showed the facility would implement and monitor individualized, person-centered behaviors of residents on psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the resident and their representative with a summary of a baseline care plan that included the initial goals of the residents, a summary of the residents medications and dietary instructions and services and treatments to be administered by the facility staff for 2 of 4 newly admitted residents (Residents 35 and 37) reviewed for baseline care plans. This failure placed the residents and their representatives at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding the initial care plan for delivery of care and services and unmet care needs.Findings included .Resident 35Review of the resident's medical record showed Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a fracture of the left foot, a history of falls, chronic pain and diabetes. Review of Resident 35's comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed they were cognitively intact and required maximum assistance with bed mobility and transfers.During an interview with Resident 35…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (Residents 25) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), received adequate dressing, grooming, nail, and oral care according to the resident's care plan. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet hygiene needs.Findings included.Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include Multiple Sclerosis (MS, a chronic disease where the immune system mistakenly attacks the protective covering of the brain and spinal cord nerve fibers that leads to communication issues between the brain and the rest of the body). The 11/12/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 25's cognition was moderately impaired and required substantial to maximum assistance for their oral and personal hygiene needs and was dependent on staff for dressing. During an interview and a concurrent observation on 01/05/2026 at 12:17 PM, Resident 25 was lying in bed, dressed in a hospital gown, with a black, horseshoe-shaped neck pillow being used as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently offer or provide repositioning for a dependent resident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 25) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed all residents at risk for discomfort, skin breakdown, and negative health outcomes. Findings included.Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include Multiple Sclerosis (MS, a chronic disease where the immune system mistakenly attacks the protective covering of the brain and spinal cord nerve fibers that leads to communication issues between the brain and the rest of the body) and hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of use of one side of the body) to the right side. The 11/12/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 25's cognition was moderately impaired and was dependent on staff for their positioning needs. During an observation and concurrent interview on 01/06/2026 at 9:51 AM, Resident 25 was lying in bed on their back and stated their bottom was hurting. Resident 25 stated they needed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide specialized services for footcare for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 25) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failed practice placed residents at risk of skin breakdown, infections, and discomfort.Findings included.Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted with diagnoses to include Multiple Sclerosis (MS, a chronic disease where the immune system mistakenly attacks the protective covering of the brain and spinal cord nerve fibers that leads to communication issues between the brain and the rest of the body). The 11/12/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 25's cognition was moderately impaired and required staff assistance for personal hygiene. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 12:17 PM, showed Resident 25 lying in bed on their back with a visitor at their bedside. The Collateral Contact (CC) stated they visited Resident 25 often and the Nursing Assistant (NA) staff did not provide Resident 25 with good nail care. The CC stated if they wanted the nails to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was consistently supervised during smoking for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 52) reviewed for smoking. This failure placed the resident at risk for avoidable accidents, injuries, and the potential risk of fire.Findings included.Review of a 02/24/2025 policy titled Smoking showed the staff responsible for supervising smoking would be in the direct area of the smoker, within eye contact and able to respond to emergency situations. The policy showed the resident's smoking materials would be maintained by the nursing staff and kept in the Nurse's station. Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted with diagnoses to include a stroke (a complication when blood supply to the brain is blocked or reduced which can lead to brain damage) and seizure disorder. The 10/23/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 52's cognition was moderately impaired and used a wheelchair independently for their mobility. An observation on 01/07/2026 at 10:07 AM, Resident 52 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement and ensure their system of records for controlled substances (CS, categories of drugs, regulated and classified based on their potential for abuse and potential to cause physical or mental dependence) disposition (the process of returning and/or destroying unused medications) and accurate reconciliation (a system of recordkeeping that ensures an accurate inventory of CS received, administered or destroyed) was completed in sufficient detail to enable the accurate accounting with these types of medications for 1 of 2 medication carts/CS logbooks (West hallway medication cart) reviewed for storage/disposition of controlled medications. This failure placed residents at risk for potential financial loss, uncontrolled pain, and possible drug diversion (the abuse of prescription drugs used for purposes other than intended by the prescriber). Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Medication Storage, dated January of 2025, showed that at each shift change two Licensed nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment by not providing scheduled maintenance services for cleaning for ceiling vents for 1 of 1 kitchen. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for cross contamination, food borne illness, and negative health outcomes.Findings included .During an observation on 01/05/2026 at 10:06 AM, the two 24 by 24 inches air vent in the kitchen located on the overhead in the middle ceiling over the food preparation areas had fuzzy brown substances that were unclean around the 24 by 24 inches square air vent grill. The air vent grill, located on the ceiling over the cook area, had multiple areas of a dark brown and grayish fuzzy substances. The 24 by 24 inches air vent grill, over the staff handwashing sink in the kitchen had accumulated brown fuzzy dust. The ceiling by the wall across the kitchen room had two 24 by 24 inches dirty air vents which had fuzzy gray dust hanging and brown dust located on the air vents.During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 10:20 AM, Staff K, Dietary Manager visualized the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-24 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a valid basis for discharge for 2 or 3 residents (Resident 1 and 2) who were not permitted to return to the facility after hospitalization and/or therapeutic leave. This deficient practice displaced residents from a safe home and placed them at risk for unmet care needs.Findings included.Review of the facility policy, Discharge and Transfer, revised on 06/11/2025, showed residents transferred to a hospital for unplanned, acute reasons must be permitted to return to the Center.Review of the facility policy Leave of Absence/Therapeutic Leave: Patient, revised on 07/15/2025, showed therapeutic leave was described as absences from the facility other than hospitalizations and cannot be a means of involuntarily discharging the patient.Resident 1Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility, on 12/22/2023, with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [(COPD) a progressive lung disease that blocks airflow, making…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms and bedside urinals in a sanitary and homelike manner for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for environment. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for compromised dignity, diminished quality of life and potential infection control issues.Findings included.Review of the facility policy, Nursing Department Infection Control Guidelines: Care of Patient Care Equipment, dated 02/28/2021 showed Personal Care Equipment such as urinals were for single patient use only, to be cleaned and disinfected after each use, discarded if heavily stained or worn, and to be covered when being stored.Resident 1Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [(COPD) a group of lung diseases that cause long-term breathing problems], cachexia (condition that causes significant weight loss and muscle loss), and major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement, monitor effectiveness, modify, and supervise interventions meant to reduce the risk of avoidable accidents related to alcohol consumption for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for accidents and hazards. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for negative outcomes related to over consumption of alcohol including driving a motor vehicle while under the influence.Findings included.Review of the facility policy Alcoholic Beverages, revised on 02/01/2023, showed an order from a medical provider was needed for alcohol consumption, alcohol supplies were to be stored in a secure location, a specified staff member would dispense the alcohol to the resident, and documentation of consumption would be completed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) or Treatment Administration Record (TAR).<Resident 3>Review of the medical record showed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of alcohol dependence,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to use personal possessions in their room, specifically a personal refrigerator, that did not infringe on the rights of other residents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of feeling emotional distress and retaliated against. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, Refrigerators: Patient In-Room, revised 08/07/2023 showed residents could have a small [two cubic feet (unit of measurement) or less] personal refrigerator in their room, and the document In Room Refrigerator Acknowledgment would be provided to inform the resident of their right to store food in the refrigerator and the process to do so. <Resident 2> Review of the medial record showed Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (a disorder in which the body's immune system attacks the protective covering of the nerve cells in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision, monitoring and/or modification of interventions related to safe smoking for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at an increased risk for avoidable smoking accidents, injuries, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled Smoking, revised 02/24/2025, showed residents who smoked would have a care plan outlining the elements needed for supervision and physical assistance while smoking, and facility leadership would consider special accommodations on an individual basis. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiparesis of the right side (paralysis of right side of body) from a stroke and epilepsy (a brain disorder causing repeated seizures). Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 03/05/2025, showed Resident 1 had moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient numbers of competent nursing staff to provide care and services for 12 of 12 residents (Resident 62, 26, 49, 8, 9, 14, 2, 51, 55, 5, 19, and 50) reviewed for resident rights, social services, activities, and restorative nursing programs. These failures placed residents at risk of not having their needs met and potential negative outcomes to their physical and mental health. Findings included . <Resident Rights> <F-550 Exercise Rights> The facility failed to ensure a process was in place to allow residents to exercise their constitutional right as a United States Citizen to vote in the 2024 Presidential Election. <Resident 26> During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 10:33 AM, Resident 26 stated they did not get to vote this year. They stated they had completed their ballot and had asked their nursing assistants and nursing staff to mail their ballot, but no one had mailed it for them. They stated it was important for them to vote, and they were disappointed that their ballot did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-19 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the contracted Dietary Manager (DM) was certified and qualified for that position. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving unsafe dietary services from staff that did not have the required competencies and skills to carry out food and dining services. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Dining Service Department, dated 10/2022, showed the facility and the contracted dietary group would employ sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets. If the qualified dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional was not employed full time, a DM of food and nutrition services who met the necessary qualifications would be employed. During an interview on 11/17/2024 at 12:14 PM, Staff T, DM, stated they had not yet taken the test to become certified as a DM. Staff T stated they took the course a long time ago and just have not gotten around to taking the test. During an interview on 11/17/2024 at 12:53 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated they were made aware Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a process was in place to ensure 4 of 6 residents (Resident 62, 26, 49, and 8) reviewed for resident rights, had the opportunity to exercise their constitutional right to vote as a citizen of United States during the 2024 Presidential election. This failure placed the residents at risk for disappointment, frustration, and psychological distress. Findings included . Review of a document titled, Washington Voting Rights for Residents, undated, showed individuals residing in long term care facilities retain their right to vote. The long-term care facility must work with the residents to ensure they were able to exercise their constitutional right to vote. The long-term care facility must not interfere with the resident exercising their right to vote or coerce them during the voting process. The facility must assist any resident to vote that has expressed the desire to vote and ensure staff did not make determinations about who was eligible to vote. The facility must help the resident register to vote, obtain ballots,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman [(ombudsman) an advocate for resident's rights in long term care) program was reviewed with residents and information was discussed on how to contact the ombudsman for 5 of 5 residents (Resident 31, 9, 11, 8, and 2) reviewed for required notices and contact information. The failure to not provide accessible ombudsman information left residents at risk for not having rightful resources and advocate available to them. Findings included . <Resident 31> Review of the medical record showed Resident 31 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), depression, and anxiety. The 09/05/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 31 was cognitively intact. <Resident 9> Review of the medical record showed Resident 9 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including a stroke and heart disease. The 10/21/2024 comprehensive assessment had a moderately impaired cognition. Resident 9 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse/neglect for 6 of 11 residents (Resident 2, 62, 38, 4, 52, and 49) reviewed for allegations of abuse/neglect. Failure to thoroughly investigate the allegations of abuse/neglect placed the residents at risk for further abuse/neglect. Findings included . According to the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition), all incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property must be thoroughly investigated. A thorough investigation is a systematic collection of review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events to determine what occurred and make necessary changes to resident's plan of care and services to prevent reoccurrence. The investigation should include the who, what, when, where, why and how, of the incident and establish a reasonable cause within 24 hours of the incident. <Resident 2> Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide, individualized, meaningful activities for 5 of 6 residents (Resident 5, 14, 26 ,41, and 51) reviewed for activity participation. This failure placed the residents at risk for boredom, social isolation, and depression. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Rec202 Program Design, dated 08/07/2023, showed the facility ' s recreation (activities) program must provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan of each resident, an ongoing program to support activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. <Resident 5> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted with diagnoses to include Multiple Sclerosis (a chronic often disabling disease that attacks the central nervous system), and cerebellar ataxia (a condition that causes a loss of muscle coordination especially in the hands and legs). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services programs were implemented for 4 of 6 residents (Resident 5, 9, 19, and 50), reviewed for restorative nursing and limited range of motion [(ROM) the extent the joint can move within the expected (normal) range of values]. This failure placed the residents at risk for loss of ROM, deconditioning, pain, and contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen). Findings included . Record review of the facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing, dated 08/07/2023, showed the facility would provide restorative nursing programs for residents who .have restorative needs arise during the course of a longer-term stay .will benefit from restorative programs .to help the patient obtain and maintain optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning . Further review of the policy showed restorative programs were coordinated by nursing and were resident specific based on individual needs. A licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 medication storage rooms (North, East, and [NAME] Hall) ensured proper disposal of expired and/or discharged resident's medications, and 1 of 3 medication carts (East Hall) were locked when left unsupervised by nursing staff. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving expired and/or compromised medications, access to potentially harmful medications, and negative health outcomes. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 01/2024, showed the medication cart was to be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the nurse, and when medications were administered, the medication cart was to be clearly visible when unlocked. Review of the policy titled Medication Storage, dated 01/2024, showed outdated, contaminated, and discontinued medications were to be removed immediately and disposed of. <Medication Cart> An observation and interview on 11/15/2024 at 10:57 AM, showed the East Hall medication cart unlocked and unattended by staff. At 11:03 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility administrative staff failed to effectively manage the facility in compliance with state and federal regulatory requirements. The facility failed to ensure there was active and engaged oversight and monitoring of systems related to recognizing abuse/neglect, accident hazards, activities, restorative therapy programs, and sufficient staffing. These failures placed the residents at risk for continued abuse/neglect, injury, decline in physical function, and dissatisfaction with their quality of life. Findings included . Review of a job description titled, Administrator, dated 01/01/2016, showed the Administrator was responsible for creating an environment where staff were highly engaged and focused on providing the highest level of clinical care and compassion to residents and families. They were responsible and accountable for all activities and departments of the facility to ensure proper healthcare services were provided to the residents, according to regulations put forth by government agencies. The Administrator directs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control interventions intended to mitigate the risk for transmission of infectious diseases for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 320, 35, and 19) reviewed for infection control. This failure placed the residents at risk for cross contamination and transmission of infectious disease. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infections Agents in Healthcare Settings, updated 09/2024, showed contact precautions were intended to prevent transmission of infectious organisms, either by direct or indirect contact with the person or environment. The contact precautions included staff to wear gown and gloves for all interactions with the affected person and environment and wash their hands with soap and water. Review of the facility policy titled Clostridioides Difficile Infection [(CDI) a bacterial infection that can cause diarrhea,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike dining room experience, including the choice to eat meals in the dining room, for 4 of 9 residents (Resident 9, 14, 51, and 2) reviewed for choices. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, isolation and weight loss. Findings included . Multiple observations of the dining room from 11/13/2024 through 11/19/2024 for all meals including breakfast, lunch, and dinner, showed no residents were provided meals in the dining room. <Resident 9> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted with diagnoses including a stroke (when blood flow to the brain is cut off, damaging brain tissue) and diabetes (a chronic disease in which there is too much sugar in the blood). The 10/21/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 9's cognition was moderately impaired and required the assistance of one staff member with set-up for meals. Record review of Resident 9's care plan dated 07/20/2024 showed they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to return the balance of funds to the Office of Financial Recovery [(OFR) responsible for the recovery of financial, medical, social services, and food assistance overpayments from the Department of Social and Health Services clients] for 3 of 4 residents (Resident 232, 60, and 231) reviewed for conveyance (the legal process of transferring property from one owner to another) of personal funds. This failure placed the state department at risk for loss of funds and interest accumulated. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Resident Funds, dated 01/16/2023, showed when a resident expired and had funds remaining in their trust account, refunds must be made via check and include a final accounting of those funds within 30 days of death. Timely processing of the refund check or in the case of death, the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate in accordance with state regulations. <Resident 232> Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy, security, and confidentiality, when a video/audio camera was placed in their room, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 55) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. This failed practice placed residents at risk for the loss of personal privacy. Findings included . Review of the policy titled Use of Audio/Video Devices (Cameras, Recording and/or Broadcasting), revised 05/01/2022, showed the Administrator would review the request for placement of an audio and/or video device for the needs of the resident. The policy further showed after the completed review, the Administrator could authorize use in accordance with state and federal laws. <Resident 55> Review of the medical record showed Resident 55 was admitted with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [(COPD) a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe] with exacerbation (a sudden worsening) and anxiety. The 08/28/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 55 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and homelike environment for 3 of 3 shower rooms (North Hall, [NAME] Hall, and East Hall), 1 of 3 hall kitchenettes (East Hall), and 3 of 6 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environment. These failures place the residents at risk of unpleasant living conditions and diminished self-worth. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Resident Rights Under Federal Law, revised 02/01/2023, showed residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and the facility would provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment. <Shower room> <North hall> An observation on 11/12/2024 at 7:02 PM, showed the North Hall shower room had a trash can that was overflowing with soiled resident briefs. The shower stall had a six inch (unit of measure), by three-inch mound of hard substance along the shower floor and wall. The mound had exposed grey, brown, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review [(PASARR) a federally required form that is used to help ensure individuals were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care] Level II comprehensive evaluation was obtained for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 41) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health care and services. Findings included . Review of the policy titled Pre-admission Screening for Mental Disorder and/or Intellectual Disability Patients, revised 02/16/2024, showed the social worker or designated staff would review resident ' s PASARRs, update per state requirements, and refer to the appropriate state designated authority. <Resident 41> Review of the medical record showed Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), major depressive disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan, within 48 hours of admission, that documented resident-specific goals and treatment plans for 4 of 7 residents (Resident 62, 35, 26, and 55) reviewed for baseline care plans. Failure to develop a baseline care plan placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and possible complications. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Person-Centered Care Plan, revised 10/24/2022, showed a baseline care plan must be developed and implemented within 48 hours of admission/readmission. The baseline care plan must include the instruction needed to provide effective and person-centered care that met professional standards of care. The baseline care plan must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident that included initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, and Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review [(PASARR) a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies were implemented to ensure staff responsible for providing cardiopulmonary resuscitation [(CPR) an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with giving breaths of air] had current CPR certification for 2 of 9 staff (Staff C and G), reviewed for CPR. Additionally, the documentation on the CPR/automated external defibrillator (AED) - a medical device that can help restore a normal heart rhythm in someone experiencing sudden cardiac arrest) Flow Sheet was incomplete/inaccurate. The facility lacked current records of CPR certification status for all staff that responded to an emergent situation requiring CPR. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of staff that were properly trained in CPR, readily available to respond in an emergency. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), revised [DATE], showed CPR certified staff would be on duty at all times. Licensed nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (the kidneys no longer function and require a process to remove waste and excess fluids from the blood stream) services met professional standards of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 27), reviewed for dialysis. The facility did not have an effective or coordinated process for communication between the facility and the offsite dialysis center for continuity of care. This failure placed residents receiving dialysis at risk for complications and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of a policy titled Dialysis: Hemodialysis [(HD) a medical treatment that filters waste/excess fluid from the blood] Provided by a Certified End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Facility, revised 08/07/2023, showed .the care of the patient receiving HD must reflect ongoing communication, coordination, and collaboration between the facility and dialysis staff .communication and responses will be documented in the medical record. <Resident 27> Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care, in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 62), reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility failed to accurately assess, monitor, and care plan Resident 62's experiences and preferences regarding their past trauma and potential triggers (a stimulus that could prompt a recall of a previous traumatic event, even if the stimulus itself was not traumatic or frightening) that may cause re-traumatization (a reliving of the traumatic experience). This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified triggers and re-traumatization. Findings included . <Resident 62> Review of the medical record showed Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a degenerative disease that causes movement problems) with dyskinesia (a side effect of Parkinson's disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain registry verification to ensure staff met competency evaluation requirements before allowing them to serve as a nursing assistant for 2 of 6 staff (Staff N and OO), reviewed for staff qualifications. This failure placed the residents at risk for abuse/neglect and unmet care needs. Findings included . The Washington State Nursing Assistant Registry [(OBRA) Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] is a database that includes the names of all individuals that meet the federal requirements to provide cares to residents of long-term care in Washington State. The OBRA registry also informs long term care facilities of individuals that are ineligible to work in long term care due to findings of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property. <Staff N> Review of Staff N's, Nursing Assistant (NA), personnel file showed their date of hire was 09/23/2024. The file showed no documentation of OBRA registry for Staff N. <Staff OO> Review of Staff OO's, NA, personnel file showed their date of hire was 05/20/2024. The file showed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals that were palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 17, 13, and 19) reviewed for food. These failures resulted in residents expressing dissatisfaction with the food and placed residents at risk for inadequate nutritional intake and weight loss. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Dining Service Department, dated 10/2022, showed food would be palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Hot foods would be held at a minimum of 135 degrees Fahrenheit [(F) a unit of temperature measurement] and cold foods would be held at a maximum of 41 degrees F. <Resident 17> Review of the medical record showed Resident 17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), and cancer. The 10/18/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 17 was dependent on one to two staff members for activities of daily living (ADLs), set up only for eating. The assessment also showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor food preferences for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 17 and 22) reviewed for dietary preferences. This failure placed the residents at risk for dissatisfaction with their dining experience and weight loss. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Dining Service Department, dated 10/2022, showed the Dietary Manager (DM) was to interview each resident for individual food preferences, document them on the Food Preference Interview assessment, upload the assessment into the resident's medical record, and update their plan of care. <Resident 17> Review of the medical record showed Resident 17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), and cancer. The 10/18/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 17 was dependent on one to two staff members for activities of daily living (ADLs), set up only for eating. The assessment also showed the resident had a moderately impaired cognition. During an interview on 11/18/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain a current hospice (a type of care that focuses on comfort and quality of life for people who were terminally ill or near the end of their life) plan of care (POC) in collaboration with contracted hospice services, that identified the provider responsible for performing each or any specific services/functions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 17) reviewed for hospice services. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services. Findings included . Review of a policy titled Hospice, dated 03/01/2018, showed each resident's POC would include both the most recent hospice POC and the facility's POC to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. <Resident 17> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses including esophageal (the muscular tube that moves food from the throat to the stomach) cancer. The 10/18/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 17's cognition was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure residents dependent on staff received assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), related to bathing and grooming, for 5 of 7 residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) reviewed for ADLs. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, impaired skin integrity, and embarrassment. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, revised on 05/01/2023, showed each resident would be assessed to identify the amount of assistance needed to complete their ADLs, and their care plan would address the manner in which the care and services would be provided. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart disease, dementia (a group of neurological conditions that cause a person to lose the ability to think, remember, and reason to the point that it interferes with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess and monitor skin integrity concerns, in accordance with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for skin assessments. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, discomfort, embarrassment, and the potential worsening of skin integrity conditions. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management, revised on 10/15/2024, showed the facility's process for assessment of residents' skin health included documenting identified skin impairments in the residents' record, notifying the medical provider, and obtaining orders for treatment and monitoring. <Resident 2> Review of the medical record showed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of amputation of right great toe, cellulitis (a bacterial infection that affects the skin and underlying tissues) of left leg, and diabetes (a condition that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly and accurately assess pressure related skin impairments, in accordance with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for pressure injuries. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for discomfort and potential worsening of pressure injuries. Findings included . Review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel's (NPIAP, the leading expert in PIs/wounds) guidelines and definitions, dated September 2016, defined pressure injury stages as follows: Stage 1 PI has intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness). Stage 2 PI is a partial thickness skin loss with exposed dermis (the top inner layers of skin). Stage 3 PI is a full thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) tissue is visible in the ulcer. Slough (dead tissue) and or eschar (dried blood and tissue) may be visible, granulation tissue and epibole (rolled or curled under edges) may include with undermining (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide staff in sufficient numbers to ensure residents' nursing and/or care needs were met in a timely manner for 15 of 15 residents (Residents 100, 41, 33, 23, 39, 300, 19, 1, 10, 32, 24, 9, 4, 35, 7 and 42) reviewed for care and services. This failure place residents at risk for unmet care needs and the inability to attain and/or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included . Review of the facility's resident roster, dated 10/10/2023, showed a census of 52, of which more than half of the residents required transfer assistance via a mechanical lift or required assistance of one to two staff. Record review of the Facility Assessment, dated 09/22/2023, showed the facility was licensed for 111 beds and had an average daily census of 52 residents. The assessment showed an average of eight to nine residents were dependent for dressing/bathing and more than half of the residents required one to two staff to complete their activities of daily living (dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an ongoing, effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan program (QAPI, a program that focused on the full range of care and services provided by the facility that included clinical care, quality of life and resident choice). The facility failed to demonstrate evidence of an ongoing QAPI program that was completed on at least a quarterly basis, was documented, included systems and reports demonstrating systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events; and documentation demonstrating the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities for 1 of 1 sampled program (QAPI) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for ongoing unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, [Facility] QAPI Process, Effective Date 02/13/2016, showed the QAPI committee was comprised of: Center Executive Director, Center Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve meals that were palatable, at the proper temperature, or ensure resident satisfaction for 6 of 9 residents (Residents 7, 8, 18, 24, 23, and 300) reviewed for food. The failure to provide palatable and appropriate temperature foods resulted in residents expressing dissatisfaction with the food and placed residents at risk for inadequate nutritional intake. Findings included . <Resident 7> Review of Resident 7's medical record showed, the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a fracture to their left leg. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed, the resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with eating and set-up help with their meals. <Resident 8> Review of Resident 8's medical record showed, the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a stroke with impairment to one side of their body. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed, the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with substitute meal choices for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 4, 24, 32, and 41) reviewed for nutrition. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with food preferences for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 4, 10, and 32) reviewed for dining. This failed practice put residents at risk for decreased intake and nutritional complications. Findings included . <Substitutes> <Resident 4> Review of Resident 4's medical record showed, the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include high blood pressure. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident's cognition was intact and required assistance with meals. Observation on 10/16/2023 at 6:52 PM showed Resident 4's dinner arrived. Staff S, Nursing Assistant (NA), set up Resident 4's dinner which consisted of breaded fish, mashed potato, green beans, white roll, blonde brownie, milk, and tea. Resident 4 told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure implementation of their Respiratory Protection Programs (RPP) annual staff fit testing (a test that verifies specific respirators fit and seal to a staff member's face allowing the respirator to protect against exposure to harmful viruses and bacteria) for 6 of 6 staff (Staff V, W, Y, R, M and N) reviewed for a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) approved (N95) fitted respirator. These failures placed residents and staff at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and transmission of infectious diseases. Findings included . Review of the Washington State Department of Health guidelines titled, Respiratory Protection Program for Long-Term Care Facilities, dated April 2023 showed an N95 respirator was used for respiratory protection, and it needed to be properly fitted to help protect against exposure to airborne (in the air) particles such as viruses and bacteria. Additionally, fit testing of N95 respirators needed to be completed on staff every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment regarding residents and staff for 1 of 1 laundry rooms (LR 1), and 2 of 4 resident care units (West and East) reviewed for a homelike environment. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for not feeling safe and secure with their environment and unmet care needs. Findings included . Observations of the facility LR 1 on 10/16/2023 at 11:57 AM showed a thick, white calcium crusted, metal water pipe that was attached/supplying water to one of the main washing machines utilized for laundering residents' clothes within the facility. It was noted that the pipe was continuously leaking out water. Directly below the leaking pipe was two large mop buckets with standing water placed to collected water from the leaking pipe. One mop bucket was three quarters full and the second was one quarter full of water. Further, the metal piping had a foam insulation (shielding that keep water pipes from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 7) reviewed for choices, was informed in writing, or given appropriate notice of a room change prior to the change. This failed practice placed the resident at risk of not being given the choice to make an informed decision, and placed them at risk for psychosocial decline and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, dated 08/07/2023, titled Room Transfers showed, the facility would provide notification in reasonable, required time frame to meet state regulation and to protect resident health. The policy further showed the resident was to receive an explanation of the reason for the room change and their right to refuse if the room move was not emergent. The policy further showed the resident should receive a copy of the Room Transfer/New Roommate Change Form and one should be kept in the resident's record. <Resident 7> Review of Resident 7's medical record showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor the need for a physical restraint (any physical, mechanical device or equipment that limits a resident's freedom of movement) when applying foam wedges under the resident's bed linen which prevented the resident from getting out of bed, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 23) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed the resident at risk for the inhibition of free movement and/or activity and at an increased risk for injury when attempting to get out of bed. Findings included . <Resident 23> Review of the medical record showed Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of stroke with paralysis and weakness affecting the resident's left side. The 09/01/2023 comprehensive assessment showed that the resident had severe cognitive impairment, and no physical restraints were implemented. Review of Resident 23's care plan showed, .has impaired communication as evidence by language…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of potential abuse and/or neglect to their State Agency, for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 42 and 40), reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse/neglect, and the potential continued exposure to abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedures, dated 02/23/2021, showed that allegations involving abuse or neglect were to be reported to their state agency .no later than (2) hours after the allegation is made if the event results in serious bodily injury .within twenty-four (24) hours if the event does not result in serious bodily injury . <Resident 42> Review of the medical record showed Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fractured right hip and, kidney disease (damage to the kidneys that impairs the filtering of blood). The admission comprehensive assessment, dated 03/13/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation regarding allegations of abuse and/or neglect for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 42 and 40) reviewed abuse/neglect. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified abuse, unmet care needs, and the potential continued exposure to abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedures, dated 02/23/2021, showed that allegations involving abuse and/or neglect were to have an investigation initiated, .only an investigation can rule out abuse, neglect or mistreatment .initiate an investigation within 2 hours of an allegation of abuse that focuses on .whether abuse or neglect occurred and to what extent .interventions to prevent further injury . <Resident 42> Review of the medical record showed Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fractured right hip and, kidney disease (damage to the kidneys that impairs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a screening process for individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] and/or intellectual disability/developmental disability [ID/DD]) assessment was accurately completed upon or prior to admission to the facility or updated during a change in condition for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 15 and 32) reviewed for PASARR. This failed practice placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health and/or developmental disability care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, dated 01/15/2021, titled Pre-admission Screening for Mental Disorder and/or Intellectual Disability Patients showed, all residents will be screeded, prior to admission, for SMI or II/DD indicators. If indicators are identified, residents should have been evaluated to ensure care and services are being provided in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) received assistance with eating, for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 39 and 41), reviewed for ADLs. This failure placed the residents at risk for weight loss, choking, and aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway or lungs) complications. Findings included . <Resident 39> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The 09/30/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required extensive assistance of two persons with repositioning, transferring, and ADL set-up with one person assistance with eating. The resident was assessed to have moderately impaired cognition. Record review of the care plan, dated 08/09/2022, showed Resident 39 was at risk for decreased ability to perform ADLs, which included eating, and they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had an ongoing activity program that met the resident individual needs for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 23 and 39) reviewed for activities. This failure increased the resident's risk to become bored and not being provided with meaningfully engagement throughout the day. Findings included . <Resident 23> Review of the medical records showed that they were admitted on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of stroke with paralysis and weakness affecting the resident's left side. The 09/01/2023 comprehensive assessment showed that the resident had severe cognitive impairment, never/rarely made decisions, was dependent on staff for transferring in/out of their wheelchair and need staff to assistance for moving around in their wheelchair. Also, the assessment showed that Resident 23's activity preferences, showed very important, included going outside to get fresh air when the weather was good and be able to participate in religious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' environment remained free of accident hazards for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 41, 100, and 33) reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to provide supervision, monitoring and/or modification of interventions related to safeguarding residents who had chosen to smoke within the facility's designated smoking area. This failure placed the resident at an increased risk for avoidable smoking accidents, significate injury, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Smoking, dated 08/07/2023, showed that a purpose of the facility's policy was to .ensure that patients who choose to smoke will do so safely . Further, that smoking would only be permitted in the designated area, .oxygen use is prohibited in smoking area ., a smoking evaluation would be completed and residents who smoked would have a care plan that included elements for, .supervision or physical assistance while smoking and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure culturally competent, trauma-informed care related to assessing for trauma and identifying triggers for residents with a history of sexual assault and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental and behavioral disorder that develops from experiencing a traumatic event) for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 7 and 15) reviewed for mood and behavior. This failed practice put residents at risk for re-traumatization, unidentified triggers, and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 7> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar (glucose)) and anxiety (an emotion which is characterized by an unpleasant state of inner turmoil and includes feelings of dread over anticipated events). The comprehensive assessment, dated 08/24/2023, showed the resident's cognition was intact and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state) were not ordered beyond 14 days or had the appropriate evaluation and documentation to extend it greater than the14 days for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to assess pharmacist recommendations timely; and attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of a psychotropic medication. This failed practice increased the risk of medical complications and unneeded medication use. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, titled Psychoactive Drug Management dated 09/20/2022 showed, PRN psychotropic medications needed a 14-day date unless re-evaluated by provider for continued use. The policy further showed non-pharmacological interventions were to be documented. <Resident 32> Review of Resident 32's medical record showed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0848 — isolated
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements provided the selection of a convenient venue (a location that agreed upon and suitable for both the resident or their representative and the facility) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 12), reviewed for arbitration. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for an unfair arbitration proces and the resident or their representative not being able to exercise their rights under the agreement. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated document titled, Voluntary Binding Arbitration Agreement, showed .arbitration shall be conducted at a place that is within 15 miles of the facility . <Resident 12> Review of the medical records showed they were admitted on [DATE] and had signed/accepted the facility's arbitration agreement on 02/02/2023. Further review showed that Resident 12's arbitration agreement document include that the arbitration venue would be conducted within 15 miles of the facility. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that abuse training which included recognizing, reporting, and preventing resident abuse was completed for 4 of 7 staff (Staff K, M, AA, and BB) reviewed for abuse training requirements. This failure placed residents at increased risk for unidentified abuse/neglect, and inadequate care from unqualified staff. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedures, dated 02/23/2021, showed that all staff would have abuse training on recognizing, reporting, and preventing resident abuse. Additionally, that abuse training for all staff was a minimum of annually. Review of Staff K, M, AA, and BB training records from 10/18/2022 to 10/17/2023 showed that none of the staff had completed the required abuse training. During an interview on 10/16/2023 at 2:13 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that Staff K, M, AA, and BB did not have the required abuse training completed. Staff A stated they did not currently have a good process in place and would be fixing it. Reference: WAC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of the required annual 12-hours of in-service training for 1 of 9 sampled Nursing Assistants (Staff O) of reviewed employee files. This failure placed residents at risk of being cared for by inadequately trained staff, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Record review of employee files, on 10/18/2023, showed Staff O, Nursing Assistant (NA), hired on 02/28/2017, did not show documentation of the required annual 12-hours of in-service training. During an interview on 10/18/2023 at 10:11 AM, Staff CC, Human Resources/Payroll, stated that it was unlikely they had NAs annual performance evaluation and training documentation because the system fell apart. During an interview on 10/18/2023 at 12:52 PM, Staff E, Staffing Coordinator/NA, and Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated that there was no system in place to ensure needed annual performance reviews, trainings and competency reviews were completed. Reference: WAC 388-97-1680(2)(a-c)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$163,278 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $37,847 — penalty dated 2024-10-30
  • $44,512 — penalty dated 2024-03-18
  • $80,919 — penalty dated 2023-10-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-01-01 for 34 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/02/2015
FC GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/11/2023
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/07/2023
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
NICKEL, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/12/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$735K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 19%Other / private 17%

This home reported $735K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$410per resident / day
operating cost
$12,458per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$420per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505320. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next