No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ansted Center

96 Tyree Street, Ansted, WV 25812 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (304) 658-5271 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (304) 658-5271 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2024Resident-funds citations (F0568, F0569)2 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,448 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,448 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-03)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
211 Maple Ave W · (304) 574-0120 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.3 mi
111 Main St · (304) 658-4426 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
East Main St, Ansted, West Virginia · (304) 658-4954 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.7%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%7.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%4.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.8%15.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication38.6%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.6%22.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.4%13.4%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.0%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.0%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.9%11.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.211.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.081.841.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.8%CMS range 25.0–48.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.7–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge29.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.3–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.301.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.07
RN hours/ resident / day
0.39
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.52
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
53.2%
Total nursing turnover
38.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 58.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.98 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.52 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the residents with an environment free from abuse from other residents. Resident #9 was physically abused by Resident#159. Resident #159 slapped Resident #9in the face. This was determined as Past Non-Compliance immediate jeopardy. Immediate jeopardy was determined to begin on 06/22/24 and was abated on 07/11/24. Resident identifiers: #159, #9. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #159 During a medical record review on 09/30/24 at approximately 10:30 AM, it was found that Resident #159 was admitted on [DATE]. Admitting diagnoses included encephalopathy, altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, and Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, and anxiety disorder. It was further identified that the resident did not have the capacity to make medical decisions and had a score of six (6) for a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). 05/22/247:34 PM a behavioral status evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to identify risk factors and provide care and services that are resident centered to prevent falls with injury and to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This was true for 3 (three) of 6 (six) residents reviewed for the Long Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 60. Resident identifiers: Resident #162, Findings include: a) Resident #162 On 10/01/24 at approximately 03:30 PM, a record review was started for Resident #162 which reveal that Resident #162 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] status post hospitalization for an unwitnessed fall that occurred at home. Resident #162 was admitted with the following past medical history: A further review of Resident #162 admitting orders revealed that an order for non-skid footwear for safety was entered upon admission with an active date of 12/11/23. Resident #162 was deemed incapacitated with long term duration due to a dx of Alzheimer's Disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-07-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, policy review, family interview, staff interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who received nutrition through a Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) received sufficient caloric intake daily to prevent weight loss. Harm occurred when the resident experienced a significant weight loss and G-tube feedings were held. The G-tube feedings were held to encourage the resident to eat by mouth, but the facility failed to have a plan in place to ensure caloric intake would be maintained if the resident did not eat by mouth. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed who receive nutrition via a G-tube. Resident #55. Facility Census: 57. Findings included: a) Resident #55 Resident #55 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. The resident had suffered a recent stroke and was admitted to the with a Gastrostomy tube (g-tube). The g-tube allowed the resident to receive nutrition directly through the stomach. b) Facility policy Facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed as posted in the facility and as printed on resident tray cards. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #15, #21, #25, #30, #37, and #54. Facility Census: 59. Findings included: a) The Lunch Menu posted for 03/23/2026 included: -Salisbury Steaks w/Gravy-Scalloped Potatoes-California Blend Vegetables-Dinner Roll-Brown Sugar Glazed Angel Food Cakeor-Kielbasa-Scalloped Potatoes-California Blend Vegetables-Dinner Roll On 03/23/26 at 12:00 PM, the posted menu, tray cards, and food service errors were reviewed with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) viewed posted menu, tray card and food errors and the DON stated, I understand. Resident #37 received California Blend Vegetables, but the tray card stated [NAME] Peas - 1/2 Cup. Resident # 37 stated, They're never right. Nursing Assistant #31 confirmed resident #37's tray and stated, Let me go see about that. No further information was provided.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and in a manner that prevents foodborne illness to the residents. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census: 59. Findings included: a) On 03/23/2026 at 10:30 AM, an initial kitchen investigation was initiated with Account Manager #69. The following items were identified: Dry Storage -Yellow Cake Mix leaking out of a bag onto the shelf.-Hotdog and hamburger buns - no use by date.-Imperial pumpkin - dented can.-Gehls Mild Cheddar Cheese - dented can.-Lasagna Noodles - not labeled in a plastic zipper bag Freezer - -Bakers' Source Southern Style Biscuits - opened in the delivery, brown box, not sealed and no use by date.-Two (2) Angel Food Cakes - no use by date. b) On 03/24/2026 at 8:50 AM, the nourishment center in the main dining room was investigated. The following items were identified: - Sterile Water -opened and dated 1/22 - water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. The facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment, creating potential health and safety risks for all residents of the facility. Facility census #59. Findings included: a) 03/24/26 at 1:20 PM during the tour of the exterior garbage dumpster area, loose trash was observed scattered around the dumpster. Items included multiple gloves, plastic spoons, plastic lids, plastic bags, Styrofoam bowls, a Pringles container, soda bottles, and loose tissue. This was confirmed with DON at 1:30 PM. 03/24/26.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure three (3) of six (6) residents received a written notification whenever their account reached within $200 of the asset level allowed for Medicaid. Resident identifiers: #55, #27, and #10. Facility census: 59. Findings included:a) A record review conducted on 03/25/26 identified the following balances in resident accounts: - Resident #55: $2,795.17- Resident #27: $2,835.00- Resident #10: $1,990.00 On 03/25/26 at 1:00 PM, Business Office Advisor (BOA) #82 stated that the required notices regarding assets being over or within $200 of the $2,000 Medicaid limit had not been sent. Admissions Director #52 confirmed this information on 03/26/26 at 1:30 PM.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for the residents. There were issues with caulking around the base of the toilets, and with base moulding as well as an issue with a bug zapper in the hallway. Room identifiers: #212, #215, Facility census: 59. a) room [ROOM NUMBER]Observation revealed missing or disrepaired caulking around the base of toilets in room [ROOM NUMBER].b) room [ROOM NUMBER]The floor molding near the sink was torn and in disrepair.The surveyor reviewed and confirmed these findings with the facility Administrator at approximately 3:20 PM.Further observation during the facility walkthrough revealed that insect control devices (bug lights) in the 100 and 200 hallways contained multiple dead insects adhered to visible sticky paper, indicating a lack of routine maintenance. The condition of these devices was inconsistent with a clean and homelike environment. The surveyor observed this on 3/24/26 at approximately 12:45 PM and confirmed it with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident or the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing; send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman; and provide the resident and the resident representative written notice which specified the duration of the bed-hold policy. This was found to be true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #64, #10. Facility census: 59. Findings included:a) Resident #64 Resident #64 had the capacity to make their own medical decisions. Resident #64 had an emergency transfer to an acute care facility on 03/13/26, following a fall at the facility. The resident returned to the facility on [DATE] following surgery for a left femur fracture resulting from the fall. The facility provided an electronic eInteract Communication Form with resident medical information to the hospital.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) of residents upon admission to the facility. This was found to be true for three (3) of seven (7) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #18, #8, and #64. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #8 On 03/23/2026 at 12:43 PM, record review for Resident #8 included a review of the resident's diagnoses. The resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Upon further review, the Pre-admission Screening (PAS) dated 02/20/26 did not include the diagnosis of schizophrenia. On 03/25/2026 at 2:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the PAS dated 02/20/26 was incorrect. Also, the DON stated, We are aware of the issues with the PASARR. b) Resident #18 On 3/23/2026 at 2:32 PM a review of the latest Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR) for Resident #18 (dated 2/1/24), provided by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to provide nail care to dependent residents to ensure nails were short, and smooth to avoid injury. Resident identifiers: #53. Facility census: 59.a) Resident #2 On 03/24/26 at 9:53 AM observation revealed Resident #2 had long, jagged unkept fingernails. The resident said she would like to have the nails shorter. On 03/24/26 at 2:00 PM Registered Nurse #4 was told what the residen [NAME] said regarding her fingernails. b) Resident #39 On 03/25/26 at 12:49 PM an observation of Resident #39 revealed this residen [NAME] long, jagged unkept fingernails. He said he would like to have them trimmed but was not sure who would do it. c) Resident #42 On 03/24/26 during the lunch meal observation revealed Resident #42 had long, jagged unkept fingernails. He said he would like to have them shorter. d) Resident #57 On 03/25/26 at 9:00 AM observation revealed this resident had long, jagged unkept fingernails. He said he would like to have them trimmed. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete. This was true for three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of unnecessary medications. One relating to a Physicians Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, one for a vaccination witness and one for medical diagnoses. Resident Identifiers: #8, #18 and #64. Facility Census: #59.Findings included: a) Resident #8 On 03/23/2026 at 3:59 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #8. The review found the informed consents for the COVID-19 vaccination and for the chicken pox, shingles, respiratory syncytial virus, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, tetanus, diptheria and pertussis vaccinations were signed by the resident. However, there were no witness signatures by staff on the document. On 03/23/26 at 4:10 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed both consents did not have witness signatures. b) Resident #64 Upon initial review of the resident's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, medical records, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow established disease control and prevention protocols. The following issues were identified: A staff member was observed carrying linens against their clothing. A staff member failed to wear a gown while providing incontinence care to a resident on enhanced barrier precautions.Signage on a resident's door failed to identify which specific bed required enhanced barrier precautions. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 59. b) Resident #4 On 03/24/26 at approximately 9:45 AM, it was observed that Nurse Aide (NA) #46 was providing incontinence care to Resident #4 behind a closed divider curtain. NA #46 was subsequently seen exiting the curtained area with bagged linens and incontinence products while not wearing a gown. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) staff members providing care to residents should gown and glove during during high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs for Resident #39. This was found true for one (1) of 29 residents reviewed. Resident identifier: #39. Facility census: 59. Findings included:a) Resident #39. During an interview with Resident #39 on 03/27/26 at 10:45 AM, the resident reported that his reclining chair, in which he slept, did not function properly. Observation and interview revealed the leg/foot rest of the recliner did not deploy. The resident stated he elevates his legs in a wheelchair at night due to the malfunctioning recliner.This concern was brought to the attention of the Director of Nursing (DON). Documentation provided by the on 03/23/26 at 3:55 PM. DON confirmed that a new reclining chair was ordered for the resident following surveyor intervention.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure two (2) of two (2) residents were provided quarterly statements. Resident identifiers: #41, and #24. Facility census: 59.Findings included: a) Resident #41 On 03/23/26 at 2:00 PM during an interview with Resident #41 and the resident's daughter they mentioned they had not received a quarterly statement to show the amount in the resident's account. During an interview with Business Office Advisor (BOA) #82 on 03/25/26 at 11:00 AM the BOA said the former business office manager had left the job and she did not think she could verify the quarterly statements had been provided. On 03/26/26 at 1:00 PM a letter dated 07/23/25 was provided to the surveyor by Admissions Director (AD) #52. The letter verified that a quarterly statement was provided for the quarter ending June 2025. No additional statements could be provided. b) Resident #24 During an interview with Resident #24 on 03/23/26 at 11:15 AM the resident stated she had not received a quarterly statement to show the amount of money in her account. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a new Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed when three (3) of seven (7) residents developed a new mental disorder. Resident identifiers: #7, #22, #53. Facility census: 59.Findings included: a) Resident #53 The most recent PASARR was completed at an acute care facility on 12/17/24. Under Section III, Question 30, Current Diagnosis (Check all that apply). (a) none was checked, and (n) Other related conditions (Specify below) bipolar disorder was typed in. Question 37 is Diagnosis - Other medical conditions requiring services. Included in the typed list are altered mental status, visual hallucinations, bipolar illness, Dementia with behavioral problem. Question 47: The individual has a primary diagnosis of: Dementia was checked. Resident #53 was admiitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident does not have capacity to make own medical decisions. The resident had the following diagnoses related to mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was provided at the correct setting per the physician's order and the resident's care plan. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #37. Facility Census: 59. Findings include: a) Resident #37On 03/23/2026, during the initial interview process, Resident #37's oxygen concentrator setting was on two (2) liters. The resident reported she was on four (4) liters of oxygen. Resident #37 reported difficulty breathing. At 11:27 AM, Corporate Registered Nurse #81 reported the oxygen concentrator was set between two (2) and three (3) liters. Corporate Registered Nurse #81 reported the resident's order stated three (3) liters, confirmed the oxygen setting was between two (2) to three (3) liters, and stated they were giving the unit to maintenance to fix. At 11:27 AM, Unit Manager #10 reported the concentrator would not go above two and a half liters so they were replacing it and giving the unit to maintenance to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow the Bed Safety Evaluation and Bed Safety Evaluation Follow-up for bed rails in order to avoid risks including entrapment due to the use of bed rails. This was true for one (1) of two (2) assessments for bed rails. Resident Identifier: #44. Facility Census: #59a) Resident #44 On 03/23/26 at 3:11 PM, Resident #44 was observed with bilateral bed rails in use. A subsequent review of the bed safety evaluation dated 01/25/26 indicated that bed rails should not be used for this resident. According to the evaluation's Step 2 guidance, if a No was recorded for any of the eight mobility questions, staff were instructed to attempt alternatives. The assessment dated [DATE] recorded No for all seven mobility questions. The Bed Safety Evaluation Follow-up dated 01/26/26 noted that alternatives, including elevating the head of the bed and a PT/OT screen, were attempted. The results confirmed these alternatives were successful, concluding that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital staff and facility staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #63 was permitted to return to the facility following a hospitalization for behavioral evaluation. The facility's refusal to readmit the resident was based on behaviors that occurred prior to the hospitalization. Resident Identifier: #63. Facility Census: 60.a) Resident #63 Record review revealed Resident #63 was transferred to the local emergency room on [DATE] due to aggressive behavior. Progress notes from [DATE] documented the resident exhibited increased agitation and verbal aggression and was sent to the local emergency room for further evaluation per physician order.Interview with Hospital Care Manager (HCM) (#75) on [DATE] revealed the facility refused to take the resident back. HCM #75 was told the resident could not return to the building or to any facility owned/operated by the same company. HCM #75 further stated the facility did not inform the hospital at the time of transfer that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide required written notice to the resident, resident representative, and the long-term care ombudsman prior to discharging Resident #63 and refusing readmission following hospitalization. The facility's failure to issue appropriate notice deprived the resident and representative of their right to appeal and participate in discharge planning. Resident Identifier: #63 Facility Census: 60Findings included:a) Resident #63Record review showed Resident #63 was transferred to the on 09/04/25 and remained hospitalized beyond the bed-hold period. Despite hospital documentation showing the resident was ready for return, the facility declined readmission.Interview with the Hospital Care Manager confirmed the resident and representative were not notified in writing of the facility's decision to refuse the resident's return. There was no evidence that:A written discharge notice was provided to the resident and representative;The notice contained the reason for discharge, effective date, and appeal rights;The state long-term care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure they served food at palatable temperatures. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents during the complaint survey process. Resident identifiers #2, #44, and #3. Facility census: 59. Findings include: a) A review on 05/27/25 at 1:00 PM, of the recorded food temperatures before meal service from 01/25 to present revealed the following dates with missing food temperatures: -01/18/25: No temperatures taken on the chicken, rice, or mashed potatoes at the lunch meal. -01/24/25: No temperatures taken on the lunch meal. -01/31/25: No temperatures taken on the fish at the supper meal. -02/08/25: No temperatures taken on the chicken, potatoes, or green beans at the lunch meal. -02/27/25: No temperatures taken on the supper meal. -03/02/25: No temperatures taken on the supper meal. -03/09/25: No temperatures taken on the supper meal. -04/23/25: No temperatures taken on the western omelet, and eggs at the breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure they implemented written policies and procedures that prohibited physical abuse, and investigated allegations of physical abuse. Resident #9 was physically abused by Resident#159. Resident #159 slapped Resident #9in the face. This was determined as Past Non-Compliance. Resident identifiers: #159, #9. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #159 During a medical record review on 09/30/24 at approximately 10:30 AM, it was found that Resident #159 was admitted on [DATE]. Admitting diagnoses included encephalopathy, altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, and Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, and anxiety disorder. It was further identified that the resident did not have the capacity to make medical decisions and had a score of six (6) for a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). 05/22/247:34 PM a behavioral status evaluation revealed the resident had physical aggression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, medical record review, staff interview and the facility abuse prohibition policy review, the facility failed to report abuse. Resident #9 was verbally abused and then physically abused. Resident identifiers: 159, #9. Facility Census: 60. Findings Included: a) On 09/30/24 at approximately 12:15 PM during a record review revealed Resident #159 had slapped Resident #9 in the face on 07/11/24 at 4:56 PM. Resident #9 was noted to have redness to the left side of face. During a review of the investigation and the staff interviews obtained at the time of the incident, the staff interview for Nurse Assistant (NA) #20's statement began with After first incident . During an interview with NA #20 at 3:15 PM on 09/30/24. NA #20 stated that Resident #159 was yelling and screaming. NA #20 said, It was the first time I saw him hit someone. NA #20 had seen the resident pushing the victim's wheelchair trying to aggravate her. NA #20 further stated Resident #159 was yelling at the victim (Resident #9) at this time. NA #20 stated, I think there are times he has hit other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure they had evidence that allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. Resident #9 was physically and verbally abused by Resident#159. Resident #159 slapped Resident #9in the face. Prior to this Resident #159 threatned harm to Resident #9. The facility did not identify this verbal abuse nor did they investigate it. This was determined as Past Non-Compliance. Resident identifiers: #159, #9. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #159 During a medical record review on 09/30/24 at approximately 10:30 AM, it was found that Resident #159 was admitted on [DATE]. Admitting diagnoses included encephalopathy, altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, and Unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, and anxiety disorder. It was further identified that the resident did not have the capacity to make medical decisions and had a score of six (6) for a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of assessment for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for dental status. Resident identifier: #37. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #37 A record review on 10/01/24 at 3:11 PM revealed the last dental assessment from a dentist was greater than one year ago. Visual observation of Resident #37, revealed the resident had two missing teeth. During an interview the Social Worker stated the resident's two front teeth were missing upon admission to the facility. However, MDS completed on 7/20/24 (post admission) had no indications of missing teeth. MDS assessments on 04/14/23, 08/21/24 and 09/14/24 further indicated no dental issues. Registered Nurse (RN) #11 was interviewed and she acknowledged she missed entering missing natural teeth on assessment. Further record review revealed that on 09/25/24 a dentist from 360 Care was set to see the resident, but the resident refused treatment. The resident had an appointment with a dentist from 360 Care on 4/10/24 but was not seen because the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to update Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR)with new qualifying diagnosis of . This was a random opportunity of discovery during the long-term care survey process. This had the ability to affect a minimum number of residents. Resident identifier: #159. Facility Census: 60. Findings Included: a) Resident #159 During a medical record review on 09/30/24 at approximately 10:30 AM it was identified that Resident #159 admitted on [DATE]. It is further identified that the resident did not have capacity with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of six (6) and was admitted with the following diagnoses dated 02/10/24: * Encephalopathy * Dysphagia, * Gastroesophageal reflux disorder * Hypertension * Unspecified voice and resonance disorder * Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris * Hypothyroidism * Other disorders of the pituitary gland, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility * Other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to update Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after one resident's behaviors intensified. This was a random opportunity of discovery during a long-term care survey process. This had the ability to affect a minimum number of residents. Resident Identifier: Resident #159. Facility Census: 60. Findings Included: a) Resident #159 During a medical record review on 09/30/24 at approximately 10:30 AM it is identified that Resident #159 was admitted on [DATE]. It is further identified that the resident did not have capacity with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of six (6) and was admitted with the diagnosis; During a review of the PASSR completed prior to the resident's admission, the PASSR was completed accurately and did not require Level II. With further medical record review for Resident #159 an exacerbation of behaviors was identified in the following residents progress notes: 03/08/24 at 10:14 AM Resident does not obey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to identify risk factors and provide care and services that are resident centered to prevent falls with injury by failing to develop and implement a resident centered fall risk care plan. This was true for 1 (one) of 6 (six) residents reviewed. Resident identifier: #162. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident #162 Findings include: a) Resident #162 On 10/01/24 at approximately 03:30 PM, a record review was started for Resident #162 which reveal that Resident #162 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] status post hospitalization for an unwitnessed fall that occurred at home. Resident #162 was admitted with the following past medical history: -Alzheimer's Disease -Hypothyroidism -Essential Hypertension -Repeated Falls -Cognitive Communication Deficit -Parkinson's Disease -Insomnia -Depression -Tremors Resident #162 was receiving the following medications upon admission: -Carbidopa-Levodopa-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide resident centered activities. A resident was not provided individual activities. This is idenified as Past Non Compliance. Resident identifiers: #159, #9. Facility Census: 60. Findings Included: a) Resident #159 On 09/30/24 at approximately 12:15 PM during a record review of a an incident it was identified that Resident #159 had slapped Resident #9 in the face at 07/11/24 at 4:56 PM and Resident #9 face was noted to have redness to the left side. During a review of the investigation the Nurse Assistant (NA) #20's statement began with After first incident . During an interview with NA #20 at 3:15 PM on 09/30/24 NA #20 stated that on 07/11/24 Resident #159 was yelling and screaming but it was the first time she saw him hit someone. NA #20 said she saw Resident #159 pushing Resident #9's wheelchair trying to aggravate her. NA #20 further stated Resident #159 was yelling at the victim (Resident #9) at this time. NA #20 stated, I think there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #27 and to ensure a mechanical lift was used, per company policy, to assist Resident #159 out of the floor following a fall. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for accidents during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #27, 159. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident #27 Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Dementia, Unspecified severity with psychotic disturbance. Muscle Weakness (generalized) Weakness Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility Other specified fracture of right pubis, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing. Resident #27 suffered falls at the facility on 05/02/24, 05/07/24, 06/09/24, and 07/03/24. As a result of the fall on 05/07/24, Resident #27 suffered a fractured left hip. This was confirmed by an x-ray on 05/09/24. Resident #27 received the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility Medical Director (MD) failed to sign orders in a timely manner to ensure Resident #37 did not miss doses of a controlled pain medication. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pain management during the survey process. Resident identifier: 37. Facility census: 60. Findings included: A) Resident #37 At approximately 1:40 PM on 09/29/2024 during an interview with Resident #37, she stated she was in constant pain a majority of the time, and had missed her pain medication on occasions because the doctor didn't sign the orders for them so the nurses couldn't get them. Resident #37 was asked how she was aware the missing doses were due to the doctor not signing the orders, she stated, The nurses came to give me my medicines and told me they couldn't give me my pain medication because they were out of it and couldn't get any more of it because the doctor hadn't signed for it. At approximately 9:00 AM on 09/30/2024, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to to ensure two (2) residents was supplied with working call light. and/or accessible call lights. Resident #2's call light was not working and#55's call light was not within reach. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #2 09/29/24 an observation of Resident #2's call light revealed it was not functioning. On 09/30/24 at 2:56 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility was not aware the call light was not functioning prior to yesterday upon the surveyor finding it. Per an interview with the resident at this time, she states she does not know if anyone knew it was not working. She did not specifically tell anyone that she could recall. b) Resident #55 During interview and observation on on 09/29/24 it was determined that Resident #55's call light cord was pressed between the bed and the wall and then draped over the overhead lights. The cord would not move due to being stuck between the bed and wall. A Nurse Aide (NA) was summoned to the room and she moved the bed away from the wall, moved the cord and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to keep the kitchen equipment in sanitary conditions. The ice machine in the kitchen contained black substance in the ice bin. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen. Facility census: 57 Findings Included: a) The improper sanitization of the Ice Machine During the initial tour of the kitchen on 07/10/23 The Food Service Director (FSD) was not present upon entering the facility. [NAME] #63 was in charge of the building. During an observation of the Ice Machine in the kitchen, it contained a black substance inside the ice bin. [NAME] #63 stated the Maintenance department was in charge of cleaning the cleaning machine monthly. An observation of the ice machine cleaning log on the outside of the ice machine stated inside the ice bin cleaned dated 06/22/23. During an interview on 07/10/22 at 10:22 AM Maintenance Director 49 observed the black substance inside the ice machine ice bin. Maintenance Director #49 took a paper towel and wiped the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete record for . This was true for five (5) residents reviewed. Resident identifiers: #12, #52, #3, #23, #55. Facility Census: 57. Findings included: a) Resident #12 A record review for unnecessary medications revealed Resident #12's Physician orders for medication management: Zyprexa Oral Tablet 7.5 MG (Olanzapine) Give 0.5 tablet by mouth one time a day for Dementia yells out, sexually inappropriate NPI: re-direct, offer food/drink. monitor for side effects: dry mouth, sedation with a start date 07/05/23. Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Lorazepam) *Controlled Drug* Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for anxiety document behaviors: yells out, sexually inappropriate NPI: re-direct, offer food/drink. monitor for side effects: dry mouth, sedation with a start date 03/03/23. A continued review of Resident #12 medical record revealed a diagnosis: UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITHOUT BEHAVIORAL DISTURBANCE, PSYCHOTIC DISTURBANCE, MOOD DISTURBANCE, AND ANXIETY During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating conditions. The ice machine in the kitchen did not have a one inch air gap for drainage. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility kitchen. Facility census: 57 Findings included: a) Ice Machine drain During the initial tour of the kitchen on 07/10/23 The Food Service Director (FSD) was not present upon entering the facility. [NAME] #63 was in charge of the building. During an observation of the Ice Machine in the kitchen the ice machine water drain was touching the floor drain without a one (1) inch gap allowing for the potential for contaminants to enter the line and travel to the ice machine. During an interview on 07/10/22 at 10:22 AM the Maintenance #49 acknowledged there was not a one (1) inch air gap and the drain was touching the floor.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one (1) resident had the right to participate in the development of their care plan. Resident identifier: #52. Facility census: 57. Findings included: a) Resident #52 During an interview, on 07/10/23 at 10:47 AM, Resident # 52 stated, I have never been invited to attend a care plan meeting. During a record review on 07/11/23 at 1:43 PM Resident # 52 medical record revealed a care plan note dated Type as written 5/23/2023 10:00 Care Plan Meeting 1. Attendance (list all in attendance): (Social Services #35 name), (Registered Nurse #40 name)CRC/Nursing, (Account Manager #55 name)-Dietary, (Activities #12 name) -Activities, (Therapist #65 name )-Therapy. 2. Family/resident in attendance (Yes/No, who): Daughter in law-(name) attended. 3. Summary of meeting (Brief summary. Details are on care plan): Nursing-began Buspar 05-16-2023 for anxiety, and on 05-19-2023 levothyroxine for thyroid. No weights. No wounds. Awaiting new eye glasses. Appt August 2023 (a local physician name). Social Services-Post Form on file and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The walls in Resident #52's room were not in good repair. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents that currently reside in the facility. Resident Identifier: #52. Facility Census: 57. Findings Included: a) Resident #52 During the initial tour, on 07/10/23 at 10:47 AM, an observation of Resident #52's room walls revealed several screw holes, and several places with missing paint around the television area. There were also several scuff marks and missing paint on the walls near the floor and near the bathroom door. There was a doorknob-size hole in the wall behind the room door. During an interview, on 07/11/23 at 2:46 PM, the Administrator acknowledged the holes in the wall, the missing paint and the scuff marks. The Administrator stated this room definitely needed painting. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his/her other preferences and goals, and addressed the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This practice affected one (1) of (16) resident's care plans reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). The failure to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed for the resident's highest practicable well-being placed the resident at risk of not receiving services that would meet their desires or wants and a decreased quality of life. Resident Identifiers: #42. Facility census: 56. Findings included: a) Resident #42 Review of unnecessary medications for Resident #42 revealed: --Vistaril Capsule 25 MG (hydroxyzine pamoate) Give 1 capsule by mouth at bedtime for anxiety document behaviors: withdrawn, anxious, restlessness. NPI: attempt to calm, listen, re-direct. monitor for side effects: sedation, dry mouth with start date 02/04/23. --Buspirone HCl Tablet 15 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they revised a care plan after fall occurred. This was true for one (1) out of 15 reviewed for care plans. Resident identifier: #1. Facility Census: 57 Findings included: a) Resident #1 A review of the medical record found Resident #1 had a fall with a major injury on 06/16/23. The nursing note stated Resident #1 was ambulating per usual routine when she stumbled and fell against the back exit door on unit one (1). Resident #1 was unable to bear weight on her left leg. Upon further evaluation, the resident was guarding and striking out with left hip manipulation. Resident #1 pointed to left hip and states that's where its hurt. Resident #1 was transferred to a local hospital for further Evaluation. Tylenol 650 mg was given for pain. Upon further research it was revealed that Resident #1 did not have a history of falling. An interview with administrator on 07/11/23 at 11:45 AM, also revealed Resident #1 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated upon opening and disposed of when expired in accordance with accepted standards of care. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 57. Findings included: a) Medication cart On [DATE] at 8:35 AM, the medication cart was reviewed. The review found a Toujeo Kwik pen not dated upon the initial administration for Resident #35. Manufacturers instructions recommend discarding pen 56 days after first use even if the pen still containts insulin. A Humulin R Kwik pen for Resident #35 was found dated [DATE] upon the initial administration. The Humulin R Kwik pen was noted to be expired after 28 days. On [DATE] at 8:38 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #10 verified the Toujeo Kwik pen was not dated upon the initial administration and the Humulin R Kwik pen expired 28 days after the day of the initial administration. On [DATE] at 8:40 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) #44 was notified. DON #44…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-12 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure all handrails were securely affixed to the walls. This was a random opportunity for discovery and the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who currently reside in the facility. Facility census 57. Findings included: a) 100 hundred hall During the first phase of the survey process, it was discovered that multiple handrails on both sides of the hallway were very loose. This was verified with Nurse Aide #21 on 07/10/23 at 10:31 AM. On 07/10/23 at 10:43 AM Director of Maintenance (DM) #49. was shown the loose handrails. DM # 49 said he would check them all and fix them.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,448 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,448 — penalty dated 2024-10-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2011
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2012
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
ANTOLINI, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
CRIST, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$686K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 14%Other / private 7%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $686K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$410per resident / day
operating cost
$12,464per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$426per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515133. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next