Shenandoah Center
50 Mulberry Tree Street, Charles Town, WV 25414 · For profit - Corporation · 78 certified beds · (304) 724-1101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $48,469 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-26)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.6% | 14.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 7.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.2% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 32.0% | 15.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.1% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.7% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.4% | 22.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.8% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.5% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.9% | 79.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.7% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.3% | 11.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.61 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.76 | 1.84 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 164 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.3%CMS range 54.6–66.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 8.7–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.4–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 74.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #9 who requires dialysis received such services, in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident #9 had an arteriovenous (AV) fistula in their left arm. The facility on multiple occurrences documented they were obtaining the residents blood pressure in their left arm. Obtaining blood pressure in the arm where the AV fistula is located may result in clots, clots that can dislodge, loss of use of the fistula and could cause a stroke. All of these things put the resident in an immediate risk of serious injury and/or death. The state agency (SA) determined this failure to be an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation. The facility was notified of the IJ on 07/25/24 at 11:09 am. The SA accepted the facility's plan of correction (POC) on 07/25/24 at 1:15 PM. After observation of implementation of the POC the IJ was abated at 3:30 PM on 07/26/24. After the immediacy was removed a deficient practice remained for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free from abuse and/or neglect from staff or other residents. Resident #123 was physically abused by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #91. This created an immediate jeopardy situation. The LPN admitted to losing her temper and backhanding a combative resident. The facility took all appropriate steps after the situation including terminating the LPN. This issue is being cited as past noncompliance. Resident #23 was neglected by Nurse Aide (NA) #94. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #123, and #23. Facility Census: 71. Findings included: a) Resident #123 A record review on 07/25/24 at 12:30 PM of a Complaint #29751 revealed an incident where a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #91 had struck Resident #123 in the face on 11/09/23 at approximately 11:30 PM. Further record review revealed at the time of this incident Nurse Aides (NA) #45 and #55 were attempting to provide incontinence care to Resident #123. During care Resident #123 became combative with the NA. At this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #65 was free from significant medication errors. Resident #65 was administered an injection of 25 units of insulin on 04/19/24 when the resident was not ordered any insulin nor was he a diabetic. Giving a resident an insulin injection when they are not ordered the medication, nor a diabetic can cause serious consequences including serious harm and or death. The state agency (SA) determined this to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. The facility was notified of the IJ on 07/22/24 at 6:49 PM. The SA accepted the facility's Plan of Correction (POC) on 07/22/24 at 7:40 PM. After completing observations, record reviews, and staff interviews regarding the implementation of the POC the IJ was abated at 07/23/24 at 2:30 pm. This failed practice was a random discovery and was true for Resident #65, but due to the systemic failures the failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: 65. Facility Census: 71. Findings include: a) Resident #65…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident and staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers and/or bed baths in accordance with the residents' preference and/or plan of care. Residents stated the staff preferred to give them bed/sponge baths, rather than a shower, because it is less work. This was true for three (3) of six (6) residents reviewed for the care area of choices and for five (5) of seven (7) residents reviewed for the care area of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) during the long-term care survey process. For Resident #42 the facility failed to provide a timely transfer from her chair to her bed causing the resident to become agitated and cry out for a period of 30 minutes. This resulted in actual psychosocial harm for Resident #42. Resident # 42 was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #48, #40, #3, #51, #65, #22, #60, #63 and #42. Facility census: 71. Findings Include: a) Resident #42 During a night observation on 07/23/24 at 11:22 PM, Resident #42 was crying and saying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible in regard to resident's rooms and vanity drawers, to be free of razors, scissors, and inedible care items in the 300 hall, mounted wall heater and broken inwall receded night light in resident bathroom, also resident's bedside table with a straw in her lotion bottle. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #'s 3, 44, 50, 56 , and 88. Facility Census: 76.Findings Included: a) room [ROOM NUMBER] -During facility walk through and resident interviews on 03/05/26 at 10:56AM, 4 cans of shaving cream and 2 opened packages of razors, among other bathing products such as body lotions, shampoo, and mouthwash were found in the top 2 (two) drawers of the resident's shared sink/vanity area in room [ROOM NUMBER]. These drawers were easily accessible to any resident that may wander into the room. During an interview with Resident #3 he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to properly store food in accordance with professional standards. issues with food storage were found in the facility kitchen freezer This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census: 76On 03/09/26 at 11:10 AM, during the 2nd kitchen visit, with the Corporate Dietary Manager (CDM) revealed the CDM acknowledged the following in the freezer : -1(one) opened box of frozen ground beef with inner plastic unsealed and left open to air -1(one) opened box of fish filet's with inner plastic unsealed and left open to air Interview with Kitchen Manager on 3/9/26 at 11:10 AM, He acknowledged the frozen ground beef and frozen fish filets were left open to air and stated the staff were supposed to tie the plastic to reseal once they have been opened. -On 03/10/25 at 2:35 PM a review facility policy labeled HCSG (Health Care Services Group) Policy 019, Food Storage: Cold Foods. Procedures, number 5 stated All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Several issues were identified related to staff response times to call lights. Facility census: 76.Findings Included:a) Resident #11On 03/05/26 at 2:50 PM after completing a representative Interview with Resident #11's family member outside his room, it was observed his call light was on. Upon walking into his room, he stated he was trying to call for staff. At 3:17PM two Nurse Aide (NA) #68 and #72 came in and asked if they could help him. Resident #11 asked for a glass of water and the bed pan. One NA stated she would get the water for him and the other stated she would get him someone to help him with his bed pan and the NA left the room. At 3:25 PM Nurse Aide #45 came in to assist him with the bed pan. On 03/05/26 at 3:35 PM during an interview with NA #45 the NA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure a dignified existence for residents. Resident #16 Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure resident #16 had a right to a dignified existence Inside the facility.This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident #16. Facility Census 76.Findings Included:On 03/04/2026 at 11:46 AM during a facility walk through on the 100 hall it was observed that Resident#16's private areas and brief was exposed with the room door wide open. Three staff members were observed present in the hall with visuals into the room and did not offer privacy for the resident prior to surveyor staff bringing it to Employee #36's attention. Employee #36 then stepped into the room and pulled the curtain for privacy. In an interview with the Director of Nursing on 03/04/26 at 12:15 PM, she acknowledged the door was open while Resident #16's son was changing her but staff members in the hall did not provide privacy for resident until surveyor staff brought it to their attention.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF-ABN) form to one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the facility's beneficiary protection notification practice during an annual survey. This failure placed the resident at risk of not being informed of his rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifier: #31. Facility census: 76.Findings included: a) Resident #31On 03/10/26 at 11:02 AM, a beneficiary notification record review was completed.Resident #31 remained in the facility after his last covered Medicare Part A day on 11/11/25. There was no evidence that the SNF-ABN was ever reviewed with the resident. During an interview on 03/10/26 at 12:24 PM, the Business Office Manager reported that a SNF-ABN had not been issued.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a written Bed Hold Notice for one (1) of three residents. Resident #45 was discharged to an acute care setting. Resident Identifier: #45. Facility Census: 76.Findings included: a) Resident #45An electronic medical record review was completed on 03/10/2026 at 9:56 PM. Resident #45 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence in resident's medical record to reflect that a bed hold notice had been provided to the resident or the resident's representative. During an interview, on 03/11/26 at 8:30 AM, the Administrator acknowledged the facility could not provide evidence that a written bed hold notice had been given.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received trauma-informed care which accounted for the resident's experiences and preferences in order to mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization. Resident identifier: #62. Facility census: 76. Findings included:a) Resident #62 During an interview, on 03/05/26 at 9:18 AM, Resident #62 revealed she had a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder diagnosis stemming from a marriage involving severe domestic violence. The resident reported that loud voices directed towards her, closed doors, and any rough handling would be potential triggers for her experiencing re-traumatization. A medical record review, completed on 03/10/2026 at 10:08 PM, revealed a Social Services Assessment which reflected the PTSD diagnosis and the potential trigger of yelling. However, review of Resident #62's care plan did not find the PTSD diagnosis and potential triggers for experiencing re-traumatization addressed in any fashion. On 03/11/2026 at 9:50 AM, the Social Worker confirmed resident's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections . This failed practice was a random opportunity of discovery. Resident identifiers: #94, #9, #55, #12. Facility census: 76.- 03/04/26 at 12:04 PM: It was observed that Employee #7 handled Resident #94's hamburger buns without gloves.- 03/04/26 at 12:06 PM: During an interview, Employee #7 acknowledged the incident and stated she returned the plate to the kitchen for a replacement. - 03/04/26 at 9:55 AM: In room [ROOM NUMBER], the wheelchairs for Resident #9 and #55 had rips and tears on both armrests, exposing the inner padding.- 03/04/26 at 10:00 AM: Resident #12's wheelchair was observed to have holes and tears in the right armrest with exposed inner padding.- 03/04/26 at 2:50 PM: During an interview, the Facility DON and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Tag F657 care plan timing and revision.Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility FAILED to ensure accurate and up to date information was reflected in the residents care plan for Resident #48. This was found to be true for one of three resident record reviewed. This has the ability to effect more then one resident.resident effected #48Residents reviewed #48, #72 and #60Census: 75 Findings include:A) Resident #48Resident #48 was seen wandering into other residents' rooms drinking from their cups, eating other residents' food and getting ice out of the ice chest with bare hands. Resident #48 is not care planned for behaviors mentioned in a complaint (entering other rooms, public urination or displaying privates, using other residents' items eating from common food sources)Interview with Admin #10 stated that resident #48 that we have tried to find a more suitable place for resident #48 long term due to all his needs. Interview with RN #56 stated resident #48 had a hard time when he first got here. The resident needed and still needs a lot of re-queuing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an appropriate infection control program for disposal of soiled linen, not wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE) in enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) rooms, storage of used bedpans, placing a dirty dinner tray on the cart of clean trays and disposal of soiled gloves. These were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 71. Findings included: a) Soiled Linen On 07/23/24 at 11:09 PM, an observation was made of linen laying on the PPE cart and soiled linen on the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Registered Nurse (RN) #48 was notified and removed the soiled linen immediately. On 07/24/24 at 9:55 AM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed soiled linen should be disposed of in the appropriate container. b) Enhanced Barrier Precautions On 07/23/24 at 11:55 PM, an observation was made of RN #48 and Nurse Aide (NA) #39 transferring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to honor residents' preference for bed bath/showers. This failed practice was found true for five (5) of (7) seven residents reviewed for the care area of choices during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #60, #63, #40, #3 and #48. Facility Census: 71. Findings included: a) Resident #60 During the initial interview, on 07/22/24 at 1:22PM, Resident #60 stated, I don't get showers often. Heck, I would be happy with at least a bed bath once a week. I was in an actual shower probably over a month ago. I have asked for showers, and they say they will get to me as soon as they can and then end up doing a bed bath or not a bath at all. A record review on 07/24/24 at 12:10 PM, revealed the following care plan: Focus: I need assistance with my ADL's due to my physical limitations and history of electrolyte imbalance and weakness. Intervention: - Shower/bed bath scheduled per my preference. Monitor and document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to keep residents' medical information confidential. Facility staff left a laptop open with resident information which was visible to the public. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents residing in the Long-Term Care facility. Facility census :71 Findings include: On 07/23/24 at 11:04 PM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #48 was observed setting at the nurses' station on the computer. On 07/23/24 at 11:08 PM a computer was observed sitting on top of the medication cart unattended by staff. On the screen was resident identifiable information. During an interview on 07/23/24 at 11:12 PM, LPN #48 returned to the medication cart and locked the computer screen. He stated he was aware it was unlocked. During an interview with the Director of Nursing(DON) on 07/24/24 at 10:00 AM, The DON stated the computer and med (Medication) cart should have been locked.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, homelike environment for residents residing in room [ROOM NUMBER], #202, #203, #303, #306, #309, #310, #312, #402, #404, #407, #408, #409, #410 and the slats of the packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) in Resident #60's room. These were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 71. Findings included: a) Resident Doors On 07/23/24 at 11:25 PM, a tour of the facility was complete. The tour found the following resident doors had putty applied to the visible cracks and door frames with rough edges of wood: --201 --202 --203 --303 --306 --309 --310 --312 --402 --404 --407 --408 --409 --410 On 07/24/24 at 9:55 AM, the Administrator was notified of issues found with the resident doors. The Administrator stated, I'll have maintenance check those. b) Resident #60 During the initial observation on 07/22/24 at 1:40 PM, it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans related to Dementia, Anxiety, Dialysis and showers. This failed practice was found true for seven (7) of 34 residents reviewed for care plan accuracy and implementation during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #54, #22, #65, #51, #61, #9 and #71. Facility Census 71. Findings included: a) Resident #54 A record review on 07/23/24 at 12:30PM, of Resident #54's medial record revealed a diagnosis of Dementia with an onset date of 10/04/23. Further record review showed no diagnosis of Dementia within the care plan. During an interview on 07/24/23 at 1:30PM, The Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed the diagnosis of Dementia was not in Resident #54's care plan. b) Resident #61 On 07/24/24 at 9:00 AM, a record review was completed of Resident #61's medical record. The review found the care plan had not been developed regarding the diagnosis of anxiety disorder. The resident was seen on two (2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing at the facility. Facility Census: 71. Findings Include: a) Treatment Cart On 07/22/24 at 12:50 PM, an observation found an unlocked, unattended treatment cart in the resident tv room. The cart was in a place which was easily accessible allowing access to these medication/treatment supplies by residents, unauthorized persons, or visitors. On 07/22/24 at 1:42 PM, during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #21, it was confirmand the Treatment cart was unlocked. RN #21 verified the treatment cart should not be unlocked when unattended. She closed and locked the cart at this time. b) Resident #57 An observation on 07/22/24 at 1:23 PM found nystatin powder generic myconustatin 60 gm, at Resident #57's bed side, unsecured and unattended and allowing access to this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct yearly performance evaluations for each Nurse Aide. This was true for three (3) out of five (5) Nurse Aides reviewed during the survey process. Staff identifiers: NA #34, NA #63, NA# 61. Facility census: 71. Findings included: A) Record review At approximately 2:45 PM on 07/23/24 a review of yearly performance evaluations and educations were conducted for randomly selected Nurse Aides (NA). During review, it was discovered the facility was missing yearly performance evaluations for NA #34, NA #63, and NA #61. B) Staff interviews At approximately 3:30 PM on 07/23/24 an interview was conducted with the Administrator. During the interview, the administrator confirmed the absence of performance evaluations for the three (3) NAs. The administrator stated We knew there were some missing and we are aware of it. We are trying to get caught up on them.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to do behavior and side effect monitoring for psychotropic medications. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (5) five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #54. Facility Census 71. Findings include: a) Resident #54 Record review, on 07/24/24 at 4:00 PM, of Resident #54's orders revealed Resident #54 was ordered Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 Milligrams (MG) on 12/22/23. It further read, (1) one tablet by mouth at bedtime for Anxiety. Monitor for Sedation, morning hangover, ataxia, nausea and report side effects to physician. Further record review of Resident #54's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for behavior and side effect monitoring showed no monitoring for 12/2023, 01/2024, 02/2024, 03/2024, 04/2024, and 05/2024. During an interview on 07/25/24 at 10:00 AM, The Director of Nursing (DON) stated, We did identify a problem and are now working on it. She later confirmed the behavior and side effect monitoring was not being done.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to record temperatures for the medication refrigerator. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 71. Findings Include: On 07/25/24 at 9:25 AM, the medication room was observed. The observation found the medication refrigerator temperatures were not completed for March 2024 through July 2024. The following dates were not completed: --03/16/24 PM --03/17/24 PM --03/18/24 PM --03/19/24 PM --03/20/24 PM --03/21/24 PM --03/22/24 PM --03/23/24 AM --03/25/24 PM --03/26/24 PM --03/28/24 PM --03/29/24 AM --03/29/24 PM --03/30/24 PM --03/31/24 AM --04/01/24 PM --04/02/24 PM --04/04/24 PM --04/05/24 PM --04/06/24 PM --04/08/24 PM --04/09/24 PM --04/10/24 PM --04/11/24 PM --04/12/24 AM --04/13/24 PM --04/14/24 PM --04/15/24 AM --04/15/24 PM --04/16/24 PM --04/17/24 PM --04/18/24 PM --04/19/24 PM --04/21/24 PM --04/22/24 PM --04/23/24 AM --04/23/24 PM --04/24/24 PM --04/25/24 AM --04/25/24 PM --04/26/24 PM --04/27/24 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure food was discarded after the expiration date. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census 71. Findings included: a) Kitchen During the initial observation on 07/22/24 at 1:30 PM, the following items were found to be out of date and/or covered in an mold like substance in the kitchen: 1. Scalloped potatoes were wrapped in plastic wrap in the walk-in refrigerator with a discard date of 07/11/24. 2. There was a box of onions in the walk-in refrigerator with 8 onions in it, 4 of the onions were covered in what appeared to be mold. During an interview on 07/22/24 at 1:40 PM, The Dietary manager in training (DMT) stated, Yes, those potatoes are out of date. I will get the potatoes and onions thrown out.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident call system was functioning as designed. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility Census: 71. Findings included: a) Observation tour, on 07/22/24 at 2:30 PM, of the 200 and 300 halls, found the call light system turned off at the end of the halls. The volume was too low to be heard throughout the unit. During an interview, on 07/23/24 at 12:26 PM, the Maintenance Assistant verified it was turned off at the end of the hall. At this time, he turned the audible switch back on. He stated the staff turned it off. During an interview, on 07/23/24 at 12:33 PM, the Maintenance Director confirmed the call system was visual and audible. He stated all the call systems in the building were turned down and it had been that way since he started.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the State ombudsman of a discharge for Resident #71. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of discharges. Resident identifier: 71. Facility Census: 71. Findings Include: a) Resident #71 On 07/23/24 at 9:45 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #71. The review found the resident had been discharged to another facility on 05/09/24. However, the facility could not provide evidence of the notification of discharge was sent to the State ombudsman. On 07/23/24 at 1:00 PM, the Administrator was notified and stated, We do not have the notification to the Ombudsman regarding the discharge.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) regarding the discharge destination for Resident #71 and #72. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of discharges. Resident identifiers: #71 and #72. Facility Census: 71. Findings included: a) Resident #71 On 07/23/24 at 12:29 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #71. The review found the resident was discharged on 05/09/24 to another long-term facility. The MDS dated [DATE] listed the discharge destination of home. On 07/23/24 at 1:00 PM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the MDS was incorrect. The Administrator stated, The resident did go to another facility .not home. b) Resident #72 On 07/23/24 at 1:10 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #72. The review found the resident was discharged on 05/02/24 to home. The MDS dated [DATE] listed the discharge destination as short-term general hospital. On 07/23/24 at 2:47 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #9's care plan was revised when the status of her pressure ulcer changed. This was true for one (1) of 34 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #42. Facility Census: 71. Findings Include: a) Resident #42 A record review on 07/23/23 at 9:48 AM revealed an order for Resident #42 which read as follows: Cleanse Stage IV to right heel with wound cleanser and pat dry. Apply Calc alginate and cover with opti-foam heel protection every day. Every day shift. Further record review showed a care plan for a Pressure Ulcer to the right heel staged as a stage 2 (two) pressure ulcer. The skin and wound evaluation effective 07/22/24 has the Pressure Ulcer to the right heal as an unstageable pressure ulcer. During an interview on 07/26/24 at 10:00 AM, The Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Yes we have been having problems with this, Now, we have someone is looking at them and working on getting them all revised.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide an activity program to meet the needs and interest of the residents and failed to provide scheduled one-to-one visits for residents. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (6) six residents reviewed for activities during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers #27. Facility Census 71. Findings include: a) Resident #27 During the initial observation on 07/22/24 at 1:30 PM, Resident #27 was sitting in the Television Lounge in front of the TV. Further observation at 3:45PM, showed Resident #27 sitting in the Television Lounge in front of the TV. Further observation at 5:40PM , showed Resident #27 sitting in the Television Lounge in front of the TV. A record review on 07/24/24 at 1:00 PM of Resident #27's Activity care plan read as follows: Focus: While in the facility, I state that it is important that I have the opportunity to engage in daily routines that are meaningful relative to my preferences. GOAL: I receive one-to-one visits three times/week as tolerated through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide services and/or treatment to Resident #64 to prevent reduction in range of motion. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for limited range of motion during the survey process. Resident identifier: 64. Facility census: 71. Findings include: A) Resident #64 At approximately 9:16 AM on 07/23/24, an interview was conducted with Resident #64. During the interview, it was noted the resident seemed to have contractures in both knees, with his left knee being worse than the right. During the interview, Resident #64 states I don't remember much about when I came in, so I don't really remember when my knees got this way, I know they weren't like this when I came in, but I just don't remember when they got this way. Resident #64 stated no staff member helped him work on range of motion during times when care is being provided. At approximately 10:30 AM on 07/23/24, during a review of Resident #64's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to provide care for residents at the facility. This has the potential to affect all residents currently residing at the facility. Resident identifier: #64. Facility census: 71. Findings include: A) Resident #64 At approximately 9:16 AM on 07/23/24, an interview was conducted with Resident #64. During the interview, it was noted the resident seemed to have contractures in both knees, with his left knee being worse than the right. During the interview, Resident #64 states, I don't remember much about when I came in, so I don't really remember when my knees got this way, I know they weren't like this when I came in, but I just don't remember when they got this way. Resident #64 stated no staff member helped him work on range of motion during times when care is being provided. At approximately 10:30 AM on 07/23/24 during a review of Resident #64's medical record, it was noted that the Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately document the dental condition of Resident #227 on the admission assessment. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #227. Facility census: 71. Findings included: a) Resident #227 At approximately 9:00 AM on 07/24/24 an interview was conducted with Resident #227. During the interview, the resident stated, I only have four (4) teeth and can't chew the food very well. At approximately 9:30 AM on 07/24/24 a review of Resident #227's record was conducted. On the resident's clinical admission evaluation dated 07/19/24 at 4:24 PM, the box has own teeth was marked. However, the rest of the dental portion of the evaluation was incomplete. At approximately 2:00 PM on 07/24/24 an interview was conducted with the Administrator regarding the incomplete assessment. The administrator reviewed the dental section of the assessment and confirmed it was incomplete.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on deficiencies cited, resident interviews, resident representative interview, review of resident council minutes, resident council member interviews, review of the facility assessment, and facility staffing details, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promoted resident rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. Facility census: 74. Findings Included: a) Citations During the facility's long-term care survey relevant citations included: --See F561 --See F609 --See F657 --See F684 --See F689 --See F695 --See F697 --See F698 --See F727 --See F732 --See F755 --See F880 --See F885 b) Anonymous Resident Interviews The first anonymous resident interview was conducted on 09/26/22 at 10:06 AM. Resident reported she feels there isn't enough staff to care for her. The second anonymous resident interview was conducted on 09/26/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was present at the facility for at least eight (8) consecutive hours a day, seven (7) days a week. This was true for one (1) of six (6) randomly sampled dates from July 2022 - October 2022. This had the potential to affect all residents who currently reside at the facility. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) RN Coverage On 09/26/22 at 2:56 PM, a review of the staffing timesheets/schedules for RN coverage found one (1) occasion when RN coverage was not present in the facility. On Saturday, 07/02/22, RN coverage was 0.00 hours. There was no RN coverage in the facility. On 10/03/22 at 10:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility timesheets did not reflect any RN coverage on Saturday, 07/02/22. The DON went on to report the nurse that would have normally been scheduled to work that particular day had been on vacation. The DON noted there must have been an oversight when making the schedule because normally the DON would have filled in for any opening in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-30 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespreadReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation and staff interview the facility failed to Inform residents, their representatives, and families of those residing in facilities by 5 PM the next calendar day following the occurrence of a confirmed infection of COVID-19. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility Census: 74. Findings included: a) Covid-19 Notification On 09/27/22 a facility documentation review revealed a confirmed case of Covid-19 for a resident in the facility on 09/17/22. Continued review found no residents, representatives or families were notified until 09/21/22. During an interview on 09/27/22 at 2:38 PM The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed no family, resident or representative was notified before 5 PM 09/18/22. She stated that she notified residents, their representatives, and families on 09/21/22.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview and facility documentation review facility failed to provide a resident transportation to a scheduled outside medical appointment. The facility failed to provide one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for dialysis with transportation services to dialysis. The facility failed to obtain a physician order for a fall mat in place for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for falls. Resident identifiers: # 30, #33 and # 34. Facility census: 74. Findings included: A record review of the facility's policy titled, Dialysis: Hemodialysis- Communication and Documentation Policy, revised on 06/01/21, showed that the facility staff must assist Residents in making arrangements with safe transportation to and from the dialysis facility. a) Resident #30 A review of Resident #30 ' s medical record showed a progress note dated 08/06/22 that stated, Resident up and ready for dialysis but their is no driver to take her. Called dialysis facility and let them know she will be unable to make it due to no available transportation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff Interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from accident hazards in which it had control. Two (2) medication carts and one (1) treatment cart were left unlocked and unattended, allowing access to medications by residents and unauthorized persons. Additionally, the facility failed to lock and secure chemicals / disinfectant supplies. These were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 74. Findings included: a) 400 Hall Med Cart An observation, on 10/02/22 at 5:10 PM, found the 400 Hall Med Cart unlocked and unattended. Surveyor remained with the unlocked cart until a staff member noticed the cart had been opened by Surveyor. During an interview, on 10/02/22 at 5:12 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #30 questioned, Did it just pop open? It's been acting up. LPN #30 then locked the cart. b) Treatment Cart An observation, on 10/02/22 at 5:15 PM, found the facility's Treatment Cart by the Director of Nursing's (DON's) office unlocked and unattended. LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to assess resident's conditions and monitor for complications before and after dialysis treatments. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for dialysis treatment during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident Identifiers #47 and #30. Facility census 74. Findings Included: a) Resident #47 Medical record review of resident #47s chart revealed there were no pre and post dialysis assessments completed in resident's active chart. Continued review found a physician's order: Dialysis center every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday with chair time at 11:30 am. On 09/27/22 at 12:58 PM the facility staff were unable to locate Resident #47s dialysis communication book. During an interview on 09/27/22 at 1:05 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated that Resident #47s dialysis communication book could have been left on the transportation bus yesterday when he went to the dialysis center. The ADON verified, staff would not be able to review residents' condition during the dialysis treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-30 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census 74. Findings included: a) No Daily Nurse Staffing Posted Observation on 10/02/22 at 5:05 PM, found the daily nurse staffing posted was dated 09/29/22. An immediate interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #41 confirmed that the daily nurse staffing had not been posted for the following dates: --Friday, 09/30/22 --Saturday, 10/01/22 --Sunday, 10/02/22
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents as prescribed. This is true for 2 of 3 residents reviewed during medication administration. Resident identifiers: #120 and #62. Facility census: 74. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #120 The over the counter medication Zinc 220 milligrams (mg) was not available in the medication cart or the med storage room, during an observation of medication administration on 09/28/22 at 7:30 AM. Licensed practical Nurse (LPN) #60 acknowledged the Zinc was not available during the morning medication pass. LPN #60 stated it needed to be discontinued anyway, since the resident no longer has Covid. A review of the medical record on 09/28/22 at 10:30 AM revealed an order was written to discontinue the Zinc at 09:17 AM on 09/28/22. b) R #62 During an observation of medication administration on 09/28/22 at 08:00 AM, LPN #5 noted the prescribed supplemental medication Vitamin D3 400 units was not available in the facility to administer during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-30 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, food temperature checks, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were employed to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services in accordance with the facility assessment. These were random opportunities for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Kitchen staffing An observation on 09/26/22 at 8:45 AM, during the initial tour showed only two (2) dietary staff working in the kitchen area. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 9:15 AM, Resident # 40 stated most of the time Resident #40 does not eat because the food tastes bad and the food was cold. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 10:04 AM, Resident #46 stated that food was always cold. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 12:05 PM, Resident # 30 stated, the food is sucky. Resident # 30 stated the food tastes sucky and was always cold. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 12:05 PM, Resident #4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation, and resident council minutes the facility failed to provide food in the amount for resident needs and preference. This affected [NAME] than a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier #46. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Resident #46 During an interview on 09/26/22 at 10:04 AM Resident #46 stated the food is cold when they get it, and you don't get enough food when it's served. Review of Grievance and Concerns found a concern dated 05/08/22 about the lunch meal: Residents received two (2) small pieces of hotdog in a crescent roll and pasta salad in a four (4) ounce condiment cup with lid. A review from the Resident food committee on 05/10/22 at 10:30 AM revealed, Residents concerns about serving sizes. A review of Resident Council Minutes revealed: Resident Council 07/14/22: New Business -Meals and Dining, --Portion sizes are small. Resident Council 09/15/22: New Business…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, observation and staff interviews the facility failed to serve food at an appetizing and preferable temperature. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of Residents. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Food Tray Temperatures During an interview on 09/26/22 at 9:15 AM, Resident # 40 stated most of the time Resident #40 does not eat because the food tastes bad and the food was cold. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 10:04 AM, Resident #46 stated that food was always cold. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 12:05 PM, Resident # 30 stated, the food is sucky. Resident # 30 stated the food tastes sucky and was always cold. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 12:05 PM, Resident #4 stated that the food sucks, I'm going to have to buy my own food. The food is always cold. A food tray temperature check of the last tray served on hallway 400, on 09/26/22 at 1:15 PM, revealed the following temperatures:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-30 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure meals were served at times in accordance with resident's needs, preferences, and requests. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of Residents. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Meal Serving Time Record review of the facility's mealtimes were as followed: Breakfast- 7:00 AM Lunch- 11:30 AM Dinner- 5:00 PM During an interview on 09/26/22 at 12:05 PM, Resident # 30 asked, where was lunch? Resident #30 stated lunch should be here before noon and it is already 12:05 PM. An observation on 09/26/22 at 1:10 PM, Resident # 30 was served lunch. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 1:10 PM, Resident # 30 stated, I hate squash that's on the tray and did not want the chicken sandwich. Resident # 30 asked for an alternative. An observation on 09/26/22 at 1:55 PM, Resident # 30 received chef salad as an alternative meal. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 1:55 PM, Resident #30 stated the chef salad was pleasurable but had to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the temperature logs were complete and up to date for the walk- in refrigerator, walk-in freezer, free standing refrigerator, and dish machine. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Temperature Logs An observation on 10/02/22 at 5:20 PM, showed the October 2022 Walk-in Refrigerator Temperature Log, Walk-in Freezer Log, Dish Machine Log and Free-standing Refrigerator Temperature Logs were not completed for 10/01/22 and the morning of 10/02/22. During an interview on 10/02/22 at 5:30 PM, Dietary Staff #84 verified the temperature logs for the walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer, free standing refrigerator, and dish machine were not completed for 10/01/22 or the morning of 10/02/22.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the required thoroughness of the facility assessment to include the Dietary Manager as it related to food and nutritional services. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of Residents. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Dietary Staffing An observation on 09/27/22 at 11:30 AM, showed only two (2) Dietary staff working in the kitchen with a facility census of 74. During an interview on 09/27/22 at 11:30 AM, Dietary Manager (DM) stated food trays are started at 11:30 AM serving the dining room first and the expectation was food to be out to the halls and served within an hour after the dining room is served. DM confirmed that that daily kitchen duties were staffed with just one (1) cook and one (1) aide on every shift. An observation on 09/28/22 at 9:45 AM, showed only two (2) Dietary staff working in the kitchen with a facility census of 74. Record review of the Facility Assessment updated on 07/13/22, showed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The nurse failed to use a barrier during medication pass and touched the residents pills with her bare hands during medication prep. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #121. Resident identifier: #121. Facility census: 74. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #121 During an observation of medication preparation on 09/28/22 at 7:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #60 broke a B12 500 microgram tablet in half with her bare hands and thumb nail to administer the prescribed dose of 250 micrograms. LPN #60 dropped the lisinopril tablet on the medication cart, picked it up with her bare hand and placed it in the medicine cup with R #121's other meds. LPN #60 dropped the spirolactone tablet in the medication cart drawer, picked it up with her bare hand and placed it in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the opportunity to exercise autonomy regarding preferences that were important to their life. The facility failed to honor a resident's preference to receive a shower in the morning. This was true for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed during the annual long-term care survey process. Resident identifier #64. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Resident #64 During an Interview on 09/27/22 at 9:00 AM, Resident #64 stated she would prefer to have a shower in the morning, but the facility frequently does not have enough staff to honor that request and she is told, We don't have anybody here to do it. Resident states she frequently refuses to shower later in the afternoon / evening hours simply because it is not her preference to shower later in the day. Resident reports she mostly gets bed baths as a result. A record review, completed on 09/27/22 at 3:33 PM, revealed Resident #64 had not received a shower at any time from 09/06/22 - 09/27/22. Instead, Resident #64…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed implement written abuse and neglect policies and procedures for reporting in order to prevent all types of abuse. The facility failed to report an incident of neglect/mistreatment with Resident #221. This practice affected one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed using the abuse pathway in the survey process. Resident identifier: #221. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Facility Policy Review Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition, with a revision date of 05/01/22, revealed the center prohibits abuse, mistreatment, neglect for all patients. According to the policy employees are designated as mandated reporters and are obligated to immediately report any suspicions. The facility further defines mistreatment and neglect as: --Mistreatment is defined as inappropriate treatment or exploitation of a patient. --Neglect is defined as the failure of the Center, its employees, or service providers to provide goods and services to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident fall resulting in serious bodily injury and an allegation of neglect/mistreatment by staff, were reported in a timely manner to the appropriate state agencies. The failure to make a timely report was true for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents for falls and was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for abuse. Resident identifiers: #66 and #221. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Requirements for reporting seriously bodily injury. The Federal regulation 483.12(c)(1) directs incidents involving serious bodily injury must be reported to the state survey agency within two (2) hours after the injury is noted. The Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC) Long-Term Care Reporting Requirements guidance, dated December 4, 2019, instructs that OHFLAC and Adult Protective Services (APS) should receive the serious bodily injury report within two (2) hours. The guidance also instructs that OHFLAC and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one (1) of 18 assessments reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). The MDS assessment for Resident #72 did not accurately reflect the resident's discharge status. Resident identifier: #72. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Resident #72 On 09/27/22 at 3:48 PM, a review of the electronic medical record was completed. Review of the Discharge MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/21/22, revealed Section A was marked as Resident #72 being discharged to an acute hospital. However, the discharge plan documentation, dated 07/20/22, noted resident was scheduled for a discharge to home with family on 07/21/22 at 9:00 AM. During an interview on 10/03/22 at 11:15 AM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #72 was discharged to home. The MDS Coordinator noted the MDS coding reflecting a discharge to an acute hospital was in error and stated, I will go in and correct that now.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to revise person-centered comprehensive care plans for Resident #68's nutritional services and Resident #4's area of smoking. This practice affected two (2) of 18 Resident care plans reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). The failure to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised for the resident's highest practicable well-being placed the residents at risk of not receiving services that would meet their desires or wants and a decreased quality of life. Resident Identifiers #68 and #4. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Resident #68 On 09/27/22 a review of Resident (R#68's) medical records revealed, a physician's order: --Patient to have pleasure foods, with the order date 09/02/22. A review of the Resident #68's current care plan with the review date 09/02/22 with completion date 09/08/22 showed there was an active care plan addressing enteral feeding tube. The active goal, Resident is non-compliant with nothing by mouth (NPO) status and will take food from roommates and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure there was a current physician order to administer oxygen to a resident. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #38. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Policy Review Record review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen: Nasal Cannula, revised on 01/01/04, showed directions and steps in administering oxygen to Residents. The first step to oxygen administration was to Verify order. b) Resident #38 An observation on 09/26/22 at 9:44 AM, showed Resident # 38 laid in bed with oxygen being administered via nasal cannula at three (3) liters per minute. Record review of Resident #38's medical record showed no current oxygen order. An additional observation on 09/27/22 at 9:36 AM. Showed Resident #38 laid in bed with oxygen being administered via nasal cannula at three (3) liters per minute. During an interview on 09/27/22 at 9:40 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated Resident # 38 should be on oxygen and verified there was no current order for oxygen. The DON stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practice. The failed practice was true for one (1) of four (4) Residents reviewed for pain. Resident identifier: #38. Facility census: 74. Findings included: a) Resident #38 During an interview on 09/26/22 at 9:45 AM, Resident # 38 stated that she was in pain a lot of the time. Resident #38 stated the facility only had pain medication scheduled as needed and some staff will give pain medication every 6 hours and others do not. Resident felt pain medication was administered inconsistently. Record review of Resident #38's physician orders showed the following orders for pain medications: OxyCODONE HCl Tablet 10 MG *Controlled Drug*- Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain. Acetaminophen Tablet 325 MG (Acetaminophen)-Give 2 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Mild Pain More than 3 doses in 48 hours, notify physician/advanced practice provider (APP) Do not exceed 3g/day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$48,469 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-07-26
- $10,023 — penalty dated 2024-07-26
- $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-07-26
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-07-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| ALBAUGH, MIRANDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2020 |
| BURNER, EILISH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/11/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515167. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.