No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rosewood Center

8 Rose Street, Grafton, WV 26354 · For profit - Corporation · 69 certified beds · (304) 265-0095 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$14,433 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,433 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-11)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 33% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1 Hospital Plz · (304) 265-0400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
#1 Wal-mart Lane · (304) 265-6329 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
57 Maple Ave · (304) 265-2070 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rural Route 50 · (304) 265-3148 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
109 McGraw Ave · (304) 265-3596

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.8%14.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.8%7.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%4.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.4%15.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.2%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.4%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.4%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.2%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.0%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.5%79.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.0%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.1%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.401.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.991.841.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.8%CMS range 35.4–63.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 8.2–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.88
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
44.0%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 63.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-25)
33
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility reported incident review, and staff interview the facility delayed initiating Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to Resident #63 after staff identified he did not have a heart beat or breath sounds but was still warm to the touch. The residents record contained no documentation to indicate if he did or did not want to have CPR. The standard of care is when there is an absence of an advance directive CPR should be given. Resident #63 was found unresponsive with no pulse or respirations by facility staff at approximately 6:45 am on [DATE]. CPR was no initiated until 7:19 am which was approximately 34 minutes after he was round unresponsive with no pulse or respirations. The emergency medical squad arrived at 7:30 am and assumed care of the code. They received authorization to call the time of death around 7:55 am on [DATE]. The state agency on [DATE] entered the facility to initiate an investigation into this situation which was self-reported by the facility. On [DATE] the SA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess and treat Resident #210's pain stemming from an unstageable pressure ulcer to his left heel resulting in actual physical and psychosocial harm. The resident rated his pain as a 8 (very strong pain) on 01/30/23. The surveyor notified the resident's nurse of his pain. The resident again rated his pain as a 10 (worst pain possible) on 02/01/23 during his pressure ulcer treatment. The facility failed to provide any pain medication on 01/30/23 despite surveyor intervention. Pain medication was not provided until the surveyor again alerted staff on 02/01/23. The facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of the pain medication administered within one (1) hour after administration on 02/01/23. This practice caused unnecessary suffering for the resident. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of pain. Resident identifier: #210. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #210 During initial screening on 01/30/23 at 12:16 PM, Resident #210 stated he had pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-25 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — widespread
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker to provide and oversee social services from 10/14/25 through the time of survey, resulting in a failure to ensure appropriate follow-up, documentation, and resident support related to an allegation of misappropriation of property, abuse, neglect, reporting, and investigation. Resident identifiers: #54, #36, #32, #30, #3. Facility census: 67. Findings Include: a) Resident #32 Record review and staff interview revealed the facility did not employ a qualified social worker from 10/14/25 through the time of survey. During an interview on 03/25/26, facility administration confirmed there had been no qualified social worker employed during this time period. Record review of an allegation of misappropriation involving Resident #32 revealed the facility failed to ensure ongoing social service follow-up and oversight. On 09/10/25, Resident #32 reported unauthorized use of her debit card. Although the allegation was reported and initially investigated, the facility failed to maintain documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were disposed of in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) medication storage rooms observed. The facility failed to remove and properly dispose of 11 discontinued medications that remained in the storage room in various random drawers. This failure created a potential for medication errors or unauthorized access to medications. Facility Census: 67 Findings include:The facility's policy titled Medication Storage Storage of Medications, revised 01/26, indicated that discontinued medications must be removed from the active storage area immediately and documented for disposal to prevent accidental administration.On 03/24/26 at 9:30 AM, during a review of the medication storage room, 11 different medications were found stored in random drawers rather than being sequestered for destruction or returned to the pharmacy. The following medications were observed:-Carvedilol 3.125 MG -Tamsulosin HCL 0,4-Clopidogrel 75 MG-Dapagliflozin 10 MG-Prednisolone 20 MG-6 vials of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to the resident's personal products. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #12, #7, #39, and #68. Facility Census: 68.Findings Included:a) Resident #12During an interview with Resident #12, on 03/22/26 at 12:08 PM, a wheelchair near the resident's bed had rips and holes in the plastic cover on the left side of the head rest, and both of the arm rests covering and plastic trim, exposing the inner padding. b) Resident #17During entrance interview, on 03/22/26 at approximately 12:25 PM, it was observed that resident #17's Geri-chair had cracks and tears down the right of the back rest and on both arm rests exposing the inner padding.c) Resident #39An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of verbal abuse from staff. This failed practice was true for (1) one of (2) two residents reviewed for abuse during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #3. Facility census: 67.Findings Included: A review of the policy titled, OPS300 Abuse Prohibition, revealed verbal abuse defined as any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to patients or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Additionally, the policy directs, immediately upon identification of a concern, a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment, or neglect, the administrator or designee will report allegations involving abuse (physical, verbal, sexual, mental) no later than two (2) hours after the allegation is made. a) Resident #3 During an interview on 03/22/26 at 1:15 PM, Resident #3 who had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to report a resident allegation of verbal abuse within two (2) hours of facility staff being aware of the allegation. Additionally, the facility failed to complete and/or submit a 5-day follow-up for an allegation of abuse for Resident #77. This failed practice was found true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for abuse during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #3. Facility census: 67. Findings Included:A review of the policy titled, OPS300 Abuse Prohibition, revealed verbal abuse defined as any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to patients or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability.Additionally, the policy directs, immediately upon identification of a concern, a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment, or neglect, the administrator or designee will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation and ongoing documentation of an allegation of misappropriation of resident property for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed (Resident #32). The facility failed to maintain sufficient documentation to determine the extent of the alleged financial exploitation and failed to follow up on the outcome of the investigation, potentially placing residents at risk for continued or unaddressed misappropriation of property. Resident Identifier: #32. Facility Census: 67.Findings Included:a) Record ReviewA record review was completed on 03/24/26. The record review revealed that on 09/10/25, Resident #32 reported unknown charges on her debit card. The facility initiated an investigation and reported the allegation to the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC), Adult Protective Services (APS), the Ombudsman, and local law enforcement.Progress notes documented the following actions:-09/12/25: Law enforcement interviewed Resident #32 at the facility. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to implement a care plan related to oral hygiene. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one residents reviewed under the dental pathway during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #70. Facility census: 67.Findings Included: a) Resident #70 The initial observation, on 03/22/26 at 12:15 PM, revealed Resident #70 in the dining room, waiting for her lunch tray. Resident #70's teeth were covered in debris and had a thick white substance around her gum lines. An observation, on 03/24/25 at 2:30 PM, revealed Resident #70 in her bed. Resident's teeth were covered in debris and had a thick white substance around her gum lines. A record review, completed on 03/24/25 at 2:40 PM, revealed an oral health care plan that included the following intervention, revised 03/19/25: Provide oral hygiene/mouth care twice per day and as needed. During an interview on 03/24/25 at 3:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident #70 did not appear to have had oral hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, surveyor observation and intervention, as well as resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to maintain or improve resident's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), such as mobility for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed (Resident #60). The facility failed to follow up on the outcome of the resident receiving new custom made Hip Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis to resume Physical Therapy, placing resident at risk for continued decline in mobility. Resident Identifier: #60. Facility Census: 67.Findings include: a) Observation and Resident Interview During an initial tour of Resident #60's room, it was observed there was a brand new custom Hip Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (HKAFO) against the wall by the bed. When resident was asked how long he had the device, he stated, A few weeks now. When asked if the resident went to Physical Therapy (PT), the answer was, Not anymore. This conversation took place on 03/23/2026 at 10:10 AM in resident's room. b) Record Review Record review, completed on 03/24/2026, showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Physician orders related to medications changes and instructions for Atorvastatin, Digoxin, and Lidocaine patches were not found in the electronic record. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #4. Facility Census: 67.Findings Included: a)Resident #4's Record Review Atorvastatin:On 03/24/2026 at 12:29 PM, during Resident #4's record review, the Medical Regimen Review, dated 07/25/25, recommended Atorvastatin 40mg HS to be discontinued. The physician agreed and signed off on the discontinuation. On 03/24/2026, it was found this order still active in the electronic record. Digoxin:On 03/24/2026 at 12:29 PM, during Resident #4's record review, the Medical Regimen Review, dated 12/30/25, recommended ordering daily apical pulse readings prior to Digoxin administration along with hold parameters if pulse is less that 60, to monitor for rhythm and rate. The physician agreed and signed off on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the daily Nurse Staff Posting had the correct date. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility Census 67.Findings Included:a) Nurse staff posting:Upon facility entrance, on 03/22/26 at 11:30 AM, a review of the Nurse Staff Posting found the posting had the incorrect date of 03/20/26, revealing it had not been updated for two (2) days.During an interview on 03/22/26 at 11:39 AM, The Nurse Manager on staff stated, Yes, we had a call off and I haven't gotten to that yet.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 62 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Medicaid residents receive routine dental services. This deficient practice was found for (1) one of (1) one residents reviewed for dental services during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #70. Facility census: 67. Findings Include: The facility policy titled, Dental Services, directs: Center will provide or obtain from an outside resource routine and emergency dental services, including 24-hour emergency dental care, to meet the needs of each patient. The policy defined routine dental services as follows: An annual inspection of the oral cavity for signs of disease, diagnosis of dental disease, dental radiographs as needed, dental cleaning, fillings (new and repairs), minor partial or full denture adjustments, smoothing of broken teeth, and limited prosthodontic procedures, e.g., taking impressions for dentures and fitting dentures. a) Resident #70 The initial observation on 03/22/26 at 12:15 PM, revealed Resident #70 in the dining room, waiting for her lunch tray.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record related to intellectual disability. This failed practice was found true for one (1)of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #8. Facility census: 67.Findings Include: a) Resident #8 A record review, on 03/23/26 at 2:25 PM, revealed Resident #8's most recent Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) dated 03/06/26, indicated Resident #8 has a diagnosis of Mental Retardation (intellectual disability). Further record review revealed a History and Physical (H&P), dated 01/28/26, under the History of Present illness section, the last sentence read, Patient has underlying mental retardation unable to communicate much. There was no diagnosis of Mental Retardation (intellectual disability) listed in Resident #8's medical record. During an interview on 03/23/25 at 3:35 PM, the Administrator confirmed that Mental Retardation (intellectual disability) was not listed on Resident #8's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure staff was educated/ informed on the Covid Vaccine. The facility failed to provide education on the benefits, risks, and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine to staff. This was true for one (1) of one (1) staff members selected. Census: 67. Findings include: a) Record Review Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #18 was randomly selected to verify if Covid-19 vaccine education/information was given as well as if the vaccine was offered. No record existed. b) Staff Interview Interview with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), on 03/24/2026 2:25 PM, confirmed CNA #18 was not educated on the Covid-19 vaccine. No documentation existed showing any employee was offered or educated on Covid-19 vaccinations.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were within reach. This was a random opportunity for discovery resident identifier: #27. Facility Census: 67. Findings Included: a) Resident #27 During an interview with Resident #27, on 03/23/2026 at 11:50 AM, he stated he couldn't find his call button. The staff forgot to put it back after my bed bath today. They usually clip it to my shirt. Surveyor pushed the roommate's call button. Employee #84 came into the room to answer the call light. She found the call bell behind the back of the bed and reclipped it to his shirt. b) Staff Interviews In an interview with Employee #84, on 03/23/26 at 12:02 PM, she acknowledged the call bell was not within resident's reach and clipped it to his shirt. During an interview on 03/23/26 at approximately 2:25 PM, the Director of Nursing stated she had been made aware of the call button not being within resident's reach.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0572 — pattern
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the resident council minutes, resident council meeting, and staff interview, the facility failed to inform residents both orally and in writing in a language that the residents understood of their rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities on a yearly basis. Resident identifiers: #9, #18, #22, #26, #31, #38, #40, #48, and #51. Census: 64. Findings included: a) On 02/19/25 at 10:38 AM, a review of the past 12 months of Resident Council meeting minutes was completed. Resident rights were not listed in the discussions during the Resident Council meeting minutes. During a Resident Council meeting, on 02/20/25 at 11:00 AM, the residents stated resident rights were not talked about during previous meetings. They could not remember staff discussing them in any fashion since the day of admission. During an interview on 02/20/25 at 11:55 AM, the Director of Social Services (DoSS) the DoSS stated, other than upon admission, she had not discussed resident rights with the residents since she started this facility as a social worker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on the resident council meeting, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to post notice of the availability of the most recent survey results in areas of the facility that were prominent and accessible to the public. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) During the resident council meeting on 02/19/2024 at 11:00 AM, the residents stated they were unaware they had the right to see the most recent state survey results and did not know where the results were in the building. During a facility walk-through on 02/20/25 at 12:30 PM, it was observed that the facility did not post signage regarding the availability of the most recent survey results. During an interview on 02/20/25 at approximately 12:38 PM, the former Interim Administrator (FIA) acknowledged the absence of a posted notice regarding the availability of the most recent survey results for residents and/or visitors to review.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) form to two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed during the annual survey process. Additionally, the facility failed to provide the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letter to one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed during the annual survey process. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifiers: #218, #317, and #318. Facility census: 64. Findings Included: a) SNF ABN On 02/19/25 at 2:15 PM, a review was completed regarding the beneficiary protection notification liability notices given for two (2) residents who remained at the facility. - Resident #218 began Medicare Part A skilled services on 09/05/24. The last covered day of Part A service was 10/16/24. There was no evidence that a SNF ABN form was provided. - Resident #317 began Medicare Part A skilled services on 10/17/24. The last covered day of Part…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify residents individually or through postings in prominent locations throughout the facility of the right to file grievances orally (meaning spoken) or in writing; the right to file grievances anonymously; the contact information of the grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed, that is, his or her name, business address (mailing and email) and business. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #9, #18, #22, #26, #31, #32, #38, #40, #48, and #51. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) During a resident council meeting, on 02/19/25 at 11:00 AM, the residents stated they knew they were able to file a grievance with the social worker, but did not know how or where to file an anonymous grievance or complaint. During a facility walk-through with the Administrator, on 02/20/25 at approximately 12:30 PM, the Administrator acknowledged there were no grievance forms available nor were there any posted signs stating residents were able to file a grievance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident abuse. This was true for six (6) of six (6) facility reported incidents reviewed. Resident identifiers: #54, #30, #216, #48, #218, #32, and #12. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) A record review, completed 02/19/25 at 6:30 PM, revealed there was a resident-to-resident altercation on 11/27/24 at 12:00 PM. The facility reportable and investigation revealed that staff observed Resident #54 pushing Resident #30 in his wheelchair down the hallway. Resident #54 aggressively shoved the wheelchair forward causing Resident #30 to fall to the floor. Resident #30 had an abrasion on his head and some skin tears on his right hand. A record review, completed on 02/19/25 at 7:15 PM, revealed there was a resident-to-resident altercation on 12/01/24 at 4:15 PM. The facility reportable and investigation revealed that staff were notified by the family of Resident #216 that Resident #54 was yelling at them and becoming hostile while they were trying to visit. Resident #54…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete their self-identified corrective action which was intended to protect residents following an investigation into a resident-to-resident physical altercation that was verified as abuse. The facility failed to oversee the complete implementation of staff being retrained on the facility's 1:1 Supervision policy. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents in the building. Facility Census: 64 Findings included: a) Resident #54 A record review, completed on 02/20/25 at 5:07 PM, revealed there was a physical resident-to-resident altercation on 12/28/24 at 1:19 PM. The facility reportable and investigation revealed staff reported Resident #54 was in the dining room for the communal lunch program. There were approximately 6-7 resident remaining in the dining room at the time of the incident. The Activities Assistant was about 20 feet away from Resident #54 when Resident #218 returned to the dining room. Resident #54 got up and walked over to Resident #218 and kicked him in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan regarding Resident #219's activities preferences, weights, and dental issues, Resident #220 anticoagulation therapy, Resident #42's behavior and side effect monitoring of medications as well as activities, Resident #8's leave of absence and Resident #54's physical behavior. This is true for (5) five of 32 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #219, #220, #42, #8 and #54. and Facility census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #219 On 02/19/25 at 10:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #219. The review found the care plan was not developed under the risk for limited engagement related to diagnosis of major depression, prostate cancer, anemia, morbid obesity. (Typed as written.) The following interventions under this focus area were: --I like to participate in (blank) with groups of people. --I am of (blank) faith and would like to participate in religious…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they provided care to facility residents based on their comprehensive assessment and that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards, a comprehensive care plan and the resident's choices for three (3) of 32 residents. The facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding medication administration, weight orders, and medical appointments for Resident #129, correct diagnosis for an antipsychotic medication for Resident #42 and Resident #7's choice to be placed in bed. Resident identifiers: #219, #42 and #7. Facility Census: 64. Findings Include: a) Resident #219 On 02/25/25 at 10:48 AM, a record review was completed regarding medication administration and treatments. The review of the 07/24 through 10/24 documentation found multiple wholes on the medication and treatment administration records for 08/24. The following medications/treatments were not administered as ordered: --Fingerstick blood glucose twice daily for diabetes mellitus--08/07/24 6:00 AM --Normal saline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure they followed the recipe for the meal served. This had the potential to affect more than isolated number of residents. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Observation of food served on 02/20/25 at 12:35 revealed tuna melt served was an open faced piece of bread with toasted tuna and a slice of cheese. A review of recipe for Tuna Melt Sandwich Corporate Recipe # 4560 on 02/20/25 at approximately 12:43 PM included the following: Ingredients- Fish, tuna, chunk light, in water, can or pouch Mayonnaise, Heavy, Bulk Bread, White, Sliced Tomato, Red, Ripe, Fresh Cheese, American, Sliced Procedure- 1. Combine tuna and mayonnaise. 2. Slice tomato into 6-8 slice. 3. Preheat oven to 350 degrees Fahrenheit. Arrange bread in a single layer on a sheet pan sprayed with food release. 4. Spread a #12 (twelve) scoop of tuna mixture on each slice of bread. Top with (2) two tomato slice and (1) one cheese slice. 5. Place assembled melts in oven until cheese is fully melted. - During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to provide food that was appetizing and appealing to residents. This issue had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Resident identifiers: #55 and #20. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #20 On 02/18/25 at 1:05 PM Resident #20 was eating lunch and reported that the sandwich was mushy and microwaved. Observation by the surveyor revealed the food was unappealing. The bread was observed as mushy upon being served. b) Resident #55 On 02/18/25 at 02:29 PM Resident #55's daughter reported the food had been served and reported the food had been horrible. The daughter said, We wasn't even sure what some of it was. On 2/20/25 at 12:20 PM the kitchen supplied a test food tray of the following: Tuna Melt French Fries Mandarin oranges or Chicken Tenders French Fries Mandarin Oranges The survey team observed the Tuna Melt to be unappealing, appearing dry missing the tomato as stated in the faility's recipe.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff and resident interview and resident council meeting interview, the facility failed to offer bedtime snacks to all residents. Resident identifiers: #51 and #35. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #51 On 02/18/25 03:20 PM during an interview with Resident #51, she reported residents are not offered evening snacks but staff will get them one if they ask for it. On 02/18/25 3:30 PM during an interview with resident #35, she reported that residents are not offered evening snacks unless they have them ordered. Observation of nutrition room at nurses station on 02/18/25 at approximately 1:30 PM revealed the following food items available to all residents: -One loaf of bread -four single serving bags of potato chips -an unopened box of fudge round lunch cakes. -Coffee -A pitcher of Kool-Aid - Individually wrapped condiments. During Resident Council meeting held on 02/20/25 at 11:00 AM the council expressed concern that bedtime snack is not offered - residents stated snacks have to be asked for not offered. An interview with Nurse Aide (NA) #21 was held on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to wear hair covers in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the ability to affect all residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 63. Findings Included: a) Kitchen An observation on 02/19/25 at about 3:35 PM found the Cook/Aide #53 preparing resident drinks without a beard covering. During an interview 02/19/25 at about 3:35 PM, Cook/Aide #53 verified a beard net should be in place. At this time, he put a beard net on. b)The facility failed to wear hair nets during meal preparation. During observation of food preparation on 02/18/25 at 11:12 AM Kitchen aide #200 was observed with her hair not fully contained in her hair net. This was brought to the attention of the District Manager #68 who acknowledged and directed KA #200 to readjust her hair net. c) The kitchen failed to properly store and dispose of food in the walk-in refrigerator. During initial kitchen visit on 02/18/25 at 11:42 AM observed a large vat of prepared tea sitting in the floor of the walk in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to properly contain kitchen waste in kitchen waste receptacles. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Initial tour and observation of the kitchen area on 02/18/25 at 11:50 AM, revealed a large kitchen trash can overflowing with lid unable to fit and trash spilling into the kitchen floor. The surveyor observed the trash can at the hand washing sink. This can had trash spilling out of the top of container and on the floor. b) An interview was held on 02/18/25 at 11:55 AM with District Manager (DM) #68 who acknowledged the trash should have been contained and emptied from the receptacle.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to incorporate an effective pest control program. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) A review of an exterminator report dated 11/19/24 revealed findings of cockroaches in the kitchen area. During an interview with the Maintenance Director (MD) on 02/19/25 at about 3:20 PM the MD revealed no exterminator had serviced the facility since 11/19/24. The MD stated the maintenance department has been trying to exterminate the roaches with boric acid in the remodeled walls. During an interview the Account Manager (AM) #39 on 02/19/25 at about 3:40 PM AM #39 stated he observed roaches in the kitchen area two (2) days prior. A pest control company serviced the facility on 02/20/25 and returned on 02/26/25 for weekly treatments.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and homelike environment regarding packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC). This has the potential to affect all residents living in the facility. Room Numbers: #104, #210, #118, #123, #124. Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) An observation in room [ROOM NUMBER], on 02/24/25 at 12:35 PM, revealed lent, dirt and debris in the packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) units. When the filter was removed from the unit, it was observed to be old, torn and covered with thick lint. A continued sample review of rooms #210, #200, #118, #123 and #124 found the PTAC unit filters were old, torn and covered with thick lint. During an interview, on 02/25/25 at 1:12 PM, the Maintenance Director confirmed the PTAC units had not been cleaned or had the filter changed. He also stated they had not been following a cleaning schedule for cleaning PTAC units.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to incorporate an effective pest control program. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) A review of the exterminator report dated 11/19/24 revealed findings of cockroaches in the kitchen area. An interview with the Maintenance Director (MD) on 02/19/25 at about 3:20 PM revealed no exterminator had serviced the facility since 11/19/24. MD stated the maintenance department had been trying to exterminate the roaches with boric acid in the remodeled walls. During an interview with Account Manager (AM) #39 on 02/19/25 at about 3:40 PM AM #39 stated that he observed roaches in the kitchen area two (2) days prior. A pest control company serviced the facility on 02/20/25 and returned on 02/26/25 for weekly treatments. During the 02/26/25 treatment period an interview was conducted with the exterminator. He confirmed there were issues with roaches in the kitchen and service hall areas.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview and observation, the facility failed to promote dignity by not serving residents who reside in the same room their meals at the same time. Resident identifier: #20. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #20 On 02/18/25 at 12:35 PM, Resident #20 and roommate were observed in their rooms during the lunch meal. Resident #20's roommate had been served a meal and was eating. Resident #20 was being visited by her husband. On 2/18/2025 at 1:05 PM Resident #20's husband was opening resident's food tray in her room. He reported that she was never served a tray, and he had to ask staff to get her one. He stated that the meatball sandwich served had mushy bread and was too hot as if it had been microwaved. Resident # 20 reported that she was just going to eat the meatballs out of the inside of the sandwich. Resident #20's husband reported that he asked why his wife was not served her meal at the same time as her roommate and replied they did not know.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to inform the resident of the reason they were receiving hospice care. This was true for one (1) of eight (8) residents interviewed. Resident identifier: 40. Facility census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #40 During an interview, on 02/25/25, at approximately 1:10 PM, Resident #40 stated that hospice nurses visited him regularly. When asked why he was receiving hospice care, he expressed that he did not know what hospice was. He mentioned that he believed the hospice nurses visited everyone at the facility. The resident further stated that he was unaware of the specific hospice services being provided to him, saying, The staff bring me my medications and meals; otherwise, I take care of everything by myself. A record review conducted on 02/25/25, at 1:55 PM revealed that the resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had been discharged from the hospital after an acute hospitalization for sepsis due to a urinary tract infection. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not notify or include the resident in the planning of their care. This included the right to be involved in the planning process, the right to request meetings, and the right to ask for revisions to their care plan. Resident identifier: #40. Facility census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #40 During an interview, on 02/18/25 at approximately 11:18 AM, the resident stated he wanted to have his status re-evaluated. He stated his physician had documented that he did not have the capacity to make medical decisions. The resident stated he had requested a meeting with the facility staff. During an interview with the Director of Social Services (DSS) #7 on 02/18/25, at approximately 11:55 AM, she was notified that Resident #40 wanted his capacity evaluated. DSS #7 stated it was a difficult situation because Resident #40's Brief Interview for Mental Status conducted on 02/10/25 had revealed Resident #40's cognition was intact. However, the resident's physician still had some reservations about the resident's ability to care for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the resident's potential for independent ambulation, and failed to provide him with the assistance necessary to accomplish his choices. The resident has a right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. Resident identifier: #22. Facility Census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #22 During an interview on 02/19/25 at approximately 11:11 AM, the resident stated he wanted to ambulate. He further stated that he had attempted to ambulate by walking behind his wheelchair, but staff stop him and ask him to sit in his wheelchair. Resident further stated if there was any reason why he was not allowed to ambulate by himself, he would like to be evaluated by occupational therapy. Record review on 02/19/25 at approximately 12:15 PM, revealed the resident had been on hospice since 11/11/24. Hospice was renewed on 02/01/24 with a diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Further record review on 02/19/25 at approximately 12:15 PM revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Resident #1's room was not in good repair. This was true for one (1) of 32 residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Room identifier: 210-A. Resident identifier: #1. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #1 During an observation, on 02/18/25 at 3:43 PM, Resident #1's wall was observed on the right side with multiple drywall patches. One (1) large patch was approximately the size of a basketball. Three (3) smaller patches were also on the wall beside residents bed. When glancing at the right corner of the wall, it was observed that there was a crack measuring approximately 6 to 8 in length. Additionally, the right wall, when entering residents room, had nine (9) square drywall patches which were approximately 3 x 3 inches in size. This particular wall had a collection of resident's artwork, pictures, and personal items on display. Resident #1 enjoyed showing Surveyor her possessions and discussing each one with great pride. b)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident-to-resident abuse were reported within two (2) hours to the appropriate state agencies. The failure to make a timely report was true for one (1) of nine (9) sampled resident-to-resident altercations involving abuse that were reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process as well as complaint investigations. Resident identifiers: #54, #216. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) A record review, completed on 02/19/25 at 7:15 PM, revealed there was a resident-to-resident altercation on 12/01/24 at 4:15 PM involving Resident #54 and Resident #216. The record reflected the facility notified the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC) on 12/01/24 at 4:46 PM. However, the facility did not notify Adult Protective Services (APS) until two (2) days later, on 12/03/24 at 10:36 AM. During an interview on 02/24/25 at 3:45 PM, the former Interim Administrator acknowledged there was no evidence APS had been notified within the mandated two (2) hour window and that it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan regarding the amount of assistance needed for activities of daily living (ADLs) for Resident #45. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of activities. Resident identifier: #45. Facility Census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #45 On 02/20/25 at 11:03 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #45. The record review found under the care plan focus area of risk for decreased ability to perform ADLs (activities of daily living) in bathing, dressing .related to limited mobility. The intervention listed was, provide with partial/moderate assist for bathing as needed. However, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly dated 01/02/25 listed the resident needed substantial/maximal assistance for bathing. An interview was held with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/20/25 at 2:10 PM. The DON stated, the care plan is incorrect .the MDS is correct. regarding assistance needed for bathing.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the resident's potential for independent ambulation, and to ensure that appropriate treatments and services could be provided to maximize the resident's functional abilities. Resident Identifier: #22. Facility Census: 64. Findings Include: a) Resident #22 During an interview on 02/19/25 at approximately 11:11 AM, the resident stated that he wanted to ambulate. He further stated that he has attempted to ambulate by walking behind his wheelchair, but staff stop him and ask him to sit in his wheelchair. Resident further stated that if there was any reason why he was not allowed to ambulate by himself, He would like to be evaluated by occupational therapy. Record review on 02/19/25 at approximately 12:15 PM, revealed resident has been on hospice since 11/11/24. Renewed on 02/01/24 with a diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Further record review on 02/19/25 at approximately 12:15 PM revealed the following notes: A nursing note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living for a dependent resident (Resident #45). This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of activities of daily living. Resident identifier: #45. Facility Census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #45 On 02/18/25 at 12:00 PM, an initial interview was held with Resident #45. Upon entering the resident's room, a foul smell of body odor was noted. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated the resident required substantial/maximal assistance needed for bathing. On 02/20/25 at 11:03 AM, a review of bathing under the tasks tab from 01/01/25 through 02/20/25 was completed. The review found the resident went multiple days without any form of bathing. The following list indicates the timeframe: --01/02/25 shower --01/06/25 bed bath (four days) --01/09/25 shower (three days) --01/13/25 bed bath (four days) --01/23/25 shower (ten days) --01/27/25 shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide hearing, and vision care for two (2) residents. Resident Identifiers: #40, #219. Facility Census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #40 During an interview, on 02/18/25 at approximately 11:05 PM, Resident #40 stated that he was having difficulty hearing. Resident #40 was observed wearing hearing aids. The resident stated that his hearing aids were not working well, and that he had mentioned it to staff. He stated that the staff was aware that his hearing aids were faulty, and they spoke loudly to ensure they were heard. RN # 74 on 02/18/25 at approximately 12:02 PM confirmed the resident wore hearing aids but was unable to hear well. She stated that at times, his hearing was better. A review of the resident's Care Plan revealed he would benefit from hearing aids due to hearing loss. This plan was created on 11/10/24. On 02/18/25 at approximately 2:16 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was made aware that the resident was having difficulty hearing. DON stated that she would schedule the resident for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment that was free from accident hazards over which the facility had control. This was true for one (1) of 32 residents reviewed in the annual Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #1. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #1 Observation in Resident #1's room, on 02/18/2025 at 11:30 AM, found an opened box containing a 2.5 fluid oz. bottle of maximum strength Aspercreme with Lidocaine in Resident #1's bathroom. Resident #1 stated, The Nurse told me it would help my back pain. A subsequent record review revealed there was no physician order stating that Resident #1 could administer her own medication. Nor was there a physician order for the Aspercreme with Lidocaine which had been in the resident's possession. Review of the MSDS revealed the following information: -This product is not meant for oral consumption or for ophthalmic use. -Inhalation: May cause irritation of nose and throat -Ingestion: May be harmful if swallowed -Skin Contact: May cause slight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the pain pathway during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #19 A record review, completed on 02/19/25 at 1:49 PM, revealed the following order for Resident #19: -Norco Oral Tablet 10-325 MG (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) *Controlled Drug* Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Pain scale 5-10. Review of the Medication Administration Record for December 2024 revealed the following details: -On December 4, 2024, on the afternoon shift Resident #19's pain level was rated as 0. Norco was administered. -On December 6, 2024, on the day shift Resident #19's pain level was rated as 0. Norco was administered. -On December 16, 2024, on the day shift Resident #19's pain level was rated as 2. Norco was administered. -On December 19, 2024, on the day shift Resident #19's pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services, in addition to professional standards to address the needs of a trauma/post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)survivor for Resident #27. This is true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed under the care area of mood and behavior. Resident identifier: #27. Facility Census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #27 On 02/18/25 at 12:30 PM, an initial interview was attempted with Resident #27. The resident appeared to be sleeping. An observation was made of the mirror at the shared sink in the resident's room being covered with paper. At this time, the roommate, Resident #43 stated, They did that for him .he thinks people are coming through the mirror and the window after him. Multiple attempts were made to interview the resident. The final attempt was made on 02/19/25 at approximately 9:30 AM. The resident was non-interviewable with garbled speech. On 02/19/25 at 12:14 PM, an interview was held with the Director of Rehabilitation Services (DORS) #52. DORS #52 was present in the room to offer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure the daily nursing posting was completed accurately for three (3) days throughout the long-term care survey process. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) An observation on 02/18/25 and 02/19/25 of the facility posted staffing data, found the required resident census was not documented. Also, the posting was printed on 02/12/25 with no changes to the scheduled staff levels. A review of posted staffing data found on 07/07/24, 8/18/24, 9/22/24, 12/21/24, 12/22/24, 01/24/25 and 01/25/25, the posting was printed prior to the date of posting with no changes to the scheduled staff levels. During an interview on 02/22/25 at 10:08 AM the Interim Administrator verified the census was not documented and the staffing levels were not updated to reflect accurate levels.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure routine dental care was provided for Resident #219. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of dental services. Resident Identifier: #219. Facility Census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #219 On 02/24/25 at 7:20 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #219. The review found the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The clinical admission was completed on 07/11/24 under section EENT (Eye, Ear, Nose, Throat) group which documented the resident was edentulous. A progress note dated 09/18/24 during a regulatory visit with the facility physician stated, He says that he met with a VA (Veteran's Administration) representative earlier today about getting dentures . On 02/25/25 at 11:48 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged there were no appointments scheduled regarding the resident's dental issues.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete record regarding anticoagulation therapy for Resident #220. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of anticoagulation. Resident Identifier: #220. Facility Census: 64. Findings Include: a) Resident #220 On 02/19/25 at 2:20 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #220. The review found a physician's order dated 02/18/25 for Warfarin (Coumadin) 3mg (milligrams) by mouth in the evening. The physician's order did not list a diagnosis for the use of Warfarin. On 02/19/25 at 3:15 PM, the Administrator confirmed the physician's order did not include a diagnosis for the use of the medication.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment. This practice affected one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for urinary catheters. Resident identifier #59. Facility census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #59 An observation on 02/18/25 at 12:03 PM found, Resident #59 In a low bed with the catheter bag laying directly on the floor. A second observation on 02/18/25 at 2:12 PM found, Resident #59 in a low bed with the catheter bag laying directly on the floor. A third observation on 02/18/25 at 3:23 PM found, Resident #59 In a low bed with the catheter bag laying directly on the floor. No receptacle/barrier was in the room. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #74, on 02/18/25 at 3:28 PM, verified the catheter bag was on the floor. LPN #74 stated that a catheter bag should never touch the floor. At this time, LPN #74 sent a nurse aide to retrieve a receptacle to place the catheter bag in.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the staff abuse and neglect training contained training related dementia management and resident abuse prevention. This was true for five (5) of five (5) nurse aides reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Nurse Aide (NA) Identifiers: #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14. Facility Census: 62. Findings Include: a) Abuse Training Review A review of the following nurse aides personnel record found the following: -- NA #10 had a hire date of 03/23/22. Her training record was reviewed from 01/01/23 until 12/31/24. This review found she had the following abuse training: Protecting residents from assault and abuse for a total of 40 minutes. A review of the learning objectives for this training found it was void of any specific training related to dementia management and resident abuse prevention. -- NA # 11 had a hire date of 06/04/00. Her training record was reviewed from 01/01/23 until 12/31/24. This review found she had the following abuse training: Protecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aide (NA) # 14 had a performance evaluation completed every 12 months as required. This was true for one (1) of five (5) nurse aide files reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to effect more than isolated number of residents. Staff identifier: NA # 14 Facility Census: 62. Findings include: a) NA # 14 On 09/11/24 in the early afternoon the employee file for NA #14 was requested. N #14's hire date was 02/08/22. As part of the request her 12-month performance evaluation was requested. When the facility provided the employee file there was no performance evaluation found. The performance evaluation was again requested from Clinical Advisor #22. Later in the afternoon Clinical Advisor #22 returned and stated they did not have an up-to-date performance evaluation for NA #14. She stated, The DON was on leave, and this was missed.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility reported incident review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident record was complete and accurate. Resident #63 expired at the facility on [DATE] and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated but failed. The medical record contained no information regarding the events of [DATE]. Resident identifier: #63. Facility Census: 62. Findings include: a) Resident #63 On [DATE] the state agency received a five (5) day follow-up report regarding and incident that took place on [DATE] involving Resident #63. The five (5) day follow-up report read as follows: [DATE] FIVE DAY FOLLOW UP REPORT Alleged Perpetrator: (First and Last Name of RN #2), RN Alleged Victim: (First and Last Name of Resident #63) , resident On [DATE], (First name of Resident #63) was found unresponsive with no pulse or respirations by staff around 6:45 AM. (First and last name of Resident #63) was admitted to (Name of Facility on [DATE] for a skilled stay. His pertinent diagnoses include:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control standards for the storage of clean linen in the shower room. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 83. Findings included: a) Shower Room On 01/03/24 at 1:50 PM, a tour of the C wing shower room was completed. The tour found a cart of clean linens uncovered. On 01/03/24 at 1:52 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #19 confirmed the cart of clean linen was left uncovered. I just finished giving a shower .I was coming to cover it back up. On 01/03/24 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified and confirmed the clean linen should be covered. No further information was obtained during the survey process.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for rooms 114, 130 and 131. Facility also failed to ensure a resident was free of urine odor in her wheelchair and in her bed. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers #32. Facility census 65 Findings included: a) Resident #32 During an observation on 01/03/24 at 1:20 PM there was a strong urine odor on hall B. The urine odor was found to be coming from a soiled wheelchair. The wheelchair belonged to Resident #32 who at this time was lying in bed. During an observation on 01/03/24 at 1:22 PM there was a strong urine odor coming from Resident #32's room. It was found to be coming from the resident's mattress. During an interview on 01/03/24 at 1:30 PM with Nursing Assistant (NA) employee # 45, she stated, All the residents on this hall had UTI'S that's why it smells like this. During an interview on 01/03/24 at 1:45 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) she stated, They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect a change from eternal tube feeding to a by mouth diet. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier #55. Facility census 65 Findings included: a) Resident #55 During an observation on 01/03/24 at 2:00 PM this surveyor heard Resident #55 hollering for something to drink, he was chewing on his blanket. During a record review, on 01/03/24 at 2:15 PM, of Resident #55's care plan it showed he had an eternal feeding tube and inability to take nutrition PO (by mouth). During a record review, on 01/03/24 at 2:25 PM, of Resident #55's nutritional assessment dated for 12/27/23 it reflected the following change, discontinue order of Glucerna 1.5 bolus via gravity 356ml if meal intake is <50%. Keep HS bolus and flush orders the same. During an interview, on 01/03/24 at 2:30 PM, with the Therapy Manager, she stated, He just recently transitioned from tube feeding to PO intake. During an interview, on 01/03/24 at 2:32, with the DON, she stated, It should of been in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for Resident #67. This is true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #67. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #67 On 01/04/24 at 10:45 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #67. The review found the resident was determined to have capacity. The capacity form was completed on 02/15/23. Upon reviewing the [NAME] Virginia Physician's Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, verbal consent was taken by the resident's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA), which was completed on 02/17/23. Resident #67 did have the capacity to make medical decisions. The consent should have been obtained from the resident. On 01/04/24 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified and confirmed the consent should have been obtained from the resident not the MPOA. No further information was obtained during the survey process.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    d) Resident #24 Record review found the resident is receiving Hospice services for chronic medical conditions. Diagnoses included: PVD, History (HX) of Cardiac Ischemia, HX of alcohol dependance, HX of tobacco dependance, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and Cerebral infarction. A review of the medical records for Resident #24 revealed the following information: The facility uses a system called Swift, this a program using a camera to measure and document all wounds. On 01/31/23, Registered Nurse 54 stated the facility began using the SWIFT on 09/29/22. In addition, the facility staff do weekly skin checks. Record review found the facility documented the resident had an Arterial wound on his right foot, 2nd digit. Date: 12/01/22 Location: Right foot, 2nd digit (second toe) New- Age unknown Acquired: In-House Acquired Length: 9.66 cm Width: 7.64 cm The picture of the foot observed by the surveyor on the morning of 01/31/23 revealed all five (5) toes on the right foot including the front portion of the foot, were black in color. The facility failed to mention any of the other toes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, staff interview, record review and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the routine necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for four (4) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of pressure ulcers. Resident identifiers: #210 #27, #111 and #24. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #210 During initial screening 01/30/23 12:16 PM Resident stated he had pain level of 8 on a 1 -10 pain sale. Resident stated his left heel was throbbing and hurting. Residents heel protector boot was noted to be lying on the floor at the foot of his bed. Certified Nurse Aide #38 verified heel protector boot was laying on floor and the Resident's left heel was resting directly on the mattress. Record review showed Resident #210 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 as indicated on the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-01 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate before and after hemodialysis care and services. This was true for one (1) of one (1) reviewed for end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving hemodialysis services. Resident identifier: #111. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #111 a.1. Hemodialysis access: A review of the Hemodialysis Communication Book for Resident #111 revealed four (4) of nine (9) incomplete Hemodialysis Communication Records. The records provided no evaluations of the dialysis access site (permcath in right chest) before and after the hemodialysis treatment on 01/04/23, 01/09/23, 01/11/23 and 01/30/23. a.2 Smooth edged clamps: The facility failed to maintain two (2) smooth edged clamps with patient at all times. Observation on 12/30/23 at 1:30 PM found no smooth edge clamps at bedside noted. Confirmed by Employee #2, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Observation on 12/31/23 at 10:00 am, found resident in bed with no smooth edge clamps noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to ensure staff administered medication as directed (before meals) and timely (within one hour before or one hour after scheduled times). Staff failed to identify and follow physician orders for skin conditions (non-pressure). Additionally, the staff failed to assess, identify and treat pressure ulcers per professional standards. Resident identifiers: #13, #37, #21, #24, #27, #210, and #111. Facility census: 64. Findings include: I) Quality of care issues a) Resident #13 On 01/30/23 at 11:57 AM, the resident said she had stomach pain every day. Record review found the resident's physician documented the resident had capacity to make medical decisions on 10/08/22. Observation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure systems were in place to ensure the care and services it delivers meet acceptable standards of quality in accordance with recognized standards of practice. The facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance committee failed to identify pressure ulcers that were not identified/assessed, measured and treated. This had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents at the facility. Facility census: 64. Findings included: I) Pressure ulcers a) Resident #210 During initial screening 01/30/23 12:16 PM Resident stated he had pain level of 8 on a 1 -10 pain sale. Resident stated his left heel was throbbing and hurting. Residents heel protector boot was noted to be lying on the floor at the foot of his bed. Certified Nurse Aide #38 verified heel protector boot was laying on floor and the Resident's left heel was resting directly on the mattress. Record review showed Resident #210 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-01 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QA&A) committee consisted of the required members. The infection preventionist was not present for the QA&A meetings during the first and second quarter of 2022. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Attendance at QA&A meetings Review of the signed attendance records of facility staff members who attended the quarterly QA&A meetings for 2022 found the infection preventionist did not attend any meetings held during the first and second quarter (January, February, March, April, May, and June) of 2022. On 02/01/23 at 1:57 PM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing confirmed the infection preventionist did not attend any QA&A meetings for the first and second quarters in 2022. .

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of choices was afforded the opportunity to exercise her autonomy regarding those things that are important in her life, specifically health care options/decisions. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 64 Findings included: a) Resident #4 An interview with the resident on 01/30/23 at 12:20 PM, found the facility does not tell her when her medications are ordered, changed, or discontinued. The resident stated she has blood pressure issues and needs her medication. Record review found documentation from the physician on 07/31/21, determining the resident has capacity to make her own medical decisions and has remained so throughout her stay at the facility. The resident was admitted to the facility with a Guardian/Conservator in place, appointing WV DHHR as the resident's Guardian and the Sheriff as the resident's Conservator. A Discontinuance of Conservator was filed on March 14, 2022, removing the Sheriff from the Conservatorship,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman when the facility discharged Resident #40 and Resident #25 to the hospital. This was true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization. Resident identifiers: #40 and #25. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #40 On 01/30/23 at 12:51 PM, the resident said he was recently admitted to the hospital for pneumonia. Record review found the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. 10/30/2022 11:41 General Note: MD (medical director) ordered to send resident to (name of hospital) ER (emergency room) for eval (evaluation.) Message left for (name of family), emergency contact. Report called into (name of hospital) ER (name of hospital employee), and to EMS. Appropriate transfer documentation completed. The resident returned to the facility on [DATE]. On 01/31/23 at 1:07 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed she had no verification the ombudsman was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . b) Resident #24 Record review found the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. 01/26/2023 3:40 am- General Note: Found resident unresponsive in room. (Name of on call physician) contacted and ordered to send resident to (name of hospital) ER (emergency room) for eval (evaluation.) Message left for (name of family), emergency contact. Report called into (name of hospital). The resident returned to the facility on [DATE]. The facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the bed hold agreement. On 02/01/23 at 12:07 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the resident and the representative was not notified of the bed hold agreement when discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. She verified the notification was blank. Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident's #40 and #25 received notice of the bed hold agreement when sent to the hospital. This was true for two (2) of four (4) residents discharged to the hospital. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete an accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessment of one (1) of twenty MDS assessments reviewed during the investigation process of the survey. The medication section of the MDS assessment for Resident #14, was not coded to include the date of last gradual drug reduction (GDR) for Zyprexa noted on 06/24/22. Resident identifier: #14. Facility census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #14 During a medical record review found an annual comprehensive MDS assessment for Resident #14 with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 06/28/22 revealed the section for Medications for date of last GDR was blank. Further medical record review found a GDR for Zyprexa was approved by the attending physician on 06/24/22. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 02/01/23 at 11:15 am, she verified the MDS section for Medications did not have the date of last GDR of 06/24/22. .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for area of care plan during the long-term care survey process had the opportunity to participate in the development, review, and revision of his/her care plan. Resident Identifiers #40 and #13. Facility census 64. Findings included: a) Resident #40 Resident interview on 01/30/23 at 11:55 AM, found the resident said he had not heard of a care plan meeting and had never attended any care plan meeting. When the surveyor explained what a care plan meeting was, he again said he had never attended one and no one had ever invited him to one. Record review found the resident's physician determined the resident has capacity to make his own medical decisions on 10/08/21. On 01/31/23 at 12:48 PM, the Social Worker (SW) and Minimal Data Set (MDS) Coordinator were asked where to find documentation noting residents were invited and participated in their care planning process. The SW did not have a response, only looked over to the MDS Coordinator who said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff and family interview, the facility failed to ensure the head of the bed was at an appropriate level during continuous tube feeding administration for Resident #210. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #210. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Observation Observation on 02/01/23 at 10:40 AM showed Resident #210 to be lying flat in bed while continuous tube feeding was being administered at 65 ml hour. Registered Nurse (RN) #54 grabbed the bed control from between the head on the wall raised the head of the bed to a 45-degree angle. RN#54 verified the head of the bed was not in an appropriate position for the tube feeding to be administered. b) Record Review Record review showed an order for Enteral Feed every shift for supplemental feed. Jevity 1.5 CAL to be administered continuous via Pump 65ML per hour. Start Date 01/27/2023. Record review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Enteral Feeding: Administration by Pump, revised date 02/01/23, showed in step #6 to elevate head of bed to 30 - 45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the consulting pharmacist's recommendations were answered in a timely manner for Resident #14 and additionally, the Director of Nursing (DON) failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for Resident #14 in a timely manner after the attending physician had approved the GDR. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications during the Long Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident Identifier: #14. Facility Census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #14 A review of Resident #14's medical record found a consultant pharmacist recommendation issued on 06/20/22. This recommended Zyprexa be reduced and/or discontinued. The attending physician agreed on 06/24/22 for the Zyprexa to be reduced. The medication was not reduced until 07/20/22. Further medical record review found a pharmacist consultant report issued on 10/25/22. This recommendation was not addressed until 12/06/22; this was after the consultant pharmacist next medication regimen review (MRR) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14's drug regimen was free from unnecessary antipsychotic medications. The attending Physician agreed to do a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for Resident #14's Zyprexa on/or about 06/24/22, this medication was not reduced until 07/20/22. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident Identifier: #14. Facility Census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #14 A review of Resident #14's medical record found a pharmacy consultation report date issued was 06/20/2022. This recommended a possible GDR for Zyprexa of five (5) milligrams (mg) daily for treatment of schizophrenia. The physician responded to this recommendation on 06/24/22 and replied to reduce Zyprexa to 2.5 mg daily. Further review of the medical record found the Zyprexa was not reduced until until 07/20/22. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) found the resident had received Zyprexa 5 mg daily from 06/24/22 through 07/20/22 daily. An interview with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census 64. Findings included: a) tour of the kitchen On 01/30/23 at 11:25 AM, the first tour of the kitchen found a half empty bucket of sherbet in the walk in freezer. There was no date to indicate when the sherbet was opened. This finding was verified with the Cooperate Kitchen Manager. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 20 residents reviewed, for the care area of advance directives, had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) that was accurate and complete. Resident identifier: #9. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #9 Record review found a POST form completed on 03/07/17. Section E requiring Advance Directive (Living Will or Medical Power of Attorney), Organ and Tissue Documentation of Gift, Court-appointed Guardian, Health Care Surrogate Selection, and the name, address, and phone number of the MPOA/Surrogate/Court-appointed Guardian/Parent of Minor Contact Information was not completed. Policy review of Using the POST form 2016 Edition regarding Section E states: .This section includes a list of documents including advance directives to which the person completing the form may have referred for guidance. They include a living will, medical power of attorney form, organ and tissue document of gift, court-appointed guardian, and healthcare surrogate selection form. For situations when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the call system was accessible to one (1) of 20 residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #35. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #35 Observation at 11:35 AM on 01/30/23 with nurse aide (NA) #39 found the resident was in bed sleeping. The call light was not within reach of the resident. NA #39 was asked to locate the Resident's call system. NA #39 found the call light on the floor, under the resident's bed and placed the call light within the resident's reach. Review of the resident's care plan found the resident is able to use her call light when needed: Focus: Resident is at further risk for falls: s/p (status post) fall with lumbar fracture The goal associated with the problem: Resident will have no fall related injury through next review. Interventions included: Provide resident/caregiver education for safe techniques (including when to use call light) of transferring from wheelchair to bed Place call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-02-01 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate staff posting with the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. This was true for ten (10) out of 14 days reviewed from 09/04/22 through 09/17/22 and seven (7) of fourteen (14) reviewed from 01/15/23 through 01/28/23. Facility census 64. Findings included: a) Staff Posting A review of the staff posting revealed, on following dates, nursing staff had worked less hours than what was posted: Period of 09/04/22 through 09/17/22: -09/04/22, posted hours-2.35. actual hours per patient daily (HPPD) was 2.16. -09/05/22, posted hours-2.69. actual HPPD was 2.55. -09/06/22, posted hours-2.48. actual HPPD was 2.37. -09/08/22, posted hours-2.80. actual HPPD was 2.59. -09/09/22, posted hours-2.61. actual HPPD was 2.37. -09/10/22, posted hours-2.69. actual HPPD was 2.28. -09/14/22, posted hours-2.92. actual HPPD was 2.78. -09/15/22, posted hours-2.90. actual HPPD was 2.61. -09/16/22, posted hours-2.61. actual HPPD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,433 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
CURREY, SHALAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2025
ORVIK, BENNETTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.7M
Related-party expense33% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 6%Other / private 12%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 33% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$361per resident / day
operating cost
$10,976per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$396per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515105. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next