No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pine View Center

400 McKinley Avenue, Harrisville, WV 26362 · For profit - Corporation · 56 certified beds · (304) 643-2712 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (304) 643-2712 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
135 S Penn Ave · (304) 643-4005 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
1490 E Main St · (304) 643-2902 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1205 E Main St · (304) 643-2911 · Call to confirm hours
Park
13 S Stout St · (304) 643-4545 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.3%14.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.8%7.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.3%15.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.1%27.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.3%22.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.3%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.0%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.1%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.3%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.581.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.541.841.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay7.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 51.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-22)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to serve food in a sanitary condition. This practice had the potential to afffect all residents receiving food from the kitchen area. Facility census: 47.Findings include:a) Lunch observationDuring dining room observation on 4/20/26 at 11:30 AM food was being served on trays that were reused without being sanitized in between. Staff placed trash on trays, dumped it into the trash can and then reused the same trays to serve food.An interview with the Administrator on 4/20/26 at 11:49 AM verified that trays were being reused without sanitization.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residentsin room [ROOM NUMBER], #312, and #313 . This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number ofresidents. Facility census: 47. Findings included:a) room [ROOM NUMBER]: Room and bathroom:During a facility walk through on 04/20/26 at 11:00 AM, it was observed in the room and the bathroom:-missing caulking around the sink in the room-missing caulking around the toilet base-stained tile around the toilet base- The far right corner had a buildup of a dirty substance around the base of the wall. b) Resident bathroom room [ROOM NUMBER]:During a facility walk through on 04/20/26 at approximately 11:20 AM, the following was observed in the bathroom: -missing caulking around the base of the toilet-stained tile at the base of the toilet- The far right corner had a buildup of a dirty substance around the base of the wall.c) Resident bathroom in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident. This was a random opportunity discovered during the completion of the Beneficiary Notification pathway throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifier: 57. Facility Census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #57 An electronic medical record review revealed: -Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -Resident #57 was discharged from the facility on 12/01/25. -The care plan scanned into the electronic medical record had blanks in the area of level assistance needed for transfer/mobility/activities of daily living (ADL). Upon request, on 04/22/26 at 9:05 AM, the Administrator produced a copy of Resident #57's baseline care plan. This was the same care plan scanned into the electronic medical record. The first focus area on the care plan was, Resident requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the ability to effect a limited number of residents Facility Census:47Finding Included: a) Resident Sitting room: During a facility walkthrough, the surveyor observed the following in the sitting room wall near the nurses' station: Loose, crumbling sheetrock pieces were falling from the wall onto the floor under the left side of the window. This area was easily accessible to residents. In an interview with Employee # 46 Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) on 04/20/25 at 12:45AM, she acknowledged the crumbling sheet rock chunks falling .from the wall and onto the floor, stated she blocked it off and said she would notify the maintenance department. In an interview with the Administrator on 04/20/26 at 1:25 PM, she acknowledged the falling pieces of sheet rock around the window in the sitting room and stated shehad sent a message to maintenance. b) Inbound auxiliary wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate records for two (2) of two (2) Hospice residents sampled throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #44 and #6. Facility census: 47.Findings included: a) Resident #44 A record review on 04/21/26 at 9:20 AM, revealed a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form dated 04/13/25. Section A of the POST form revealed Resident #44 did not wish to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation if he had no pulse and was not breathing. Section B of the POST form revealed the resident wished to receive selective treatments in the event he had a pulse and was breathing. This means the resident could be transferred to the hospital if treatment needs could not be met in the facility. The section asking if the patient was enrolled in hospice was left blank on the POST form. Additionally, the record reflected Resident #44 started receiving hospice services on 05/06/25. The directions for completing the POST form, compiled by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End of Life, state the form should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place.This was random opportunity for discovery with the ability to effect a limited number of residents. Room identifiers: #310, #312, and #313. Facility census: 47. Findings included:a) Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER]:During a facility walkthrough on 04/20/26 at 11:00 AM, gnats were observed flying around and landing on the base and on the seat of the toilet, bathroom fixtures, and the walls in the bathroom.In an interview with Resident #27 on 04/20/26 at 11:05AM, he acknowledged gnats in the bathroom and could not remember how long they had been there. b) Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER]:During a facility walkthrough on 04/20/26 at approximately 11:20 AM, gnats were observed flying around and landing on the base and on the seat of the toilet, bathroom fixtures, and the walls in the bathroom.c) Bathroom [ROOM NUMBER]:During a facility walkthrough on 04/20/26 at approximately 11:20AM, it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for visitation. This is true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifiers: #1, #40. Facility census: 47. Findings Included: a) Resident #1 On 10/29/24 at 10:55 AM during an interview with Resident 1's Medical Power of Attorney, she stated that all Resident 1's visitor's including her, have issues with Resident #40 opening the door, cursing the visitors and trying to come into the room. A record review on 10/29/24 of grievances revealed no grievance form was filled out for these issues. A medical record review of progress notes revealed multiple occasions 10/22/2024 3:35 PM A note stated Resident #1's sister came to a nurse and stated Resident #40 came to resident's room opened the door and just laughed then left at 3:05 PM and 3:15 PM. 10/27/2024 2:37 PM Resident #1's sister came to the chart room notifying the nurse that Resident #40 came down the hallway opened Resident #1's door started laughing and went back into his room. 10/5/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to making prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident notified of progress toward resolution. This is true for two (2) of two (2) reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifiers: #1 and #5. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #1 Record review of the facility's policy titled, grievance /concern, showed: -Upon receipt of the grievance / concern, the grievance / concern form will be initiated by staff member receiving the concern. -Upon receipt of the grievance /concern form, the Administrator or designee will document the grievance / concern on the grievance / concern log. - Immediate action will be taken to prevent further potential violations of any patient right while the alleged violation is being investigated. -Notify the person filing the grievance of resolution in a timely manner. Resident #1 On 10/29/24 at 10:55 AM during an interview Resident #1's Medical Power of Attorney, she stated that all Resident 1's visitors including her have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to store and label food in accordance with professional standards for food service storage. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 47. Findings included: a) Observation in the pantry area of the kitchen revealed small unlabeled what appeared to be vanilla ice cream. No dates were present on the cups. b) Observation in the freezer revealed cooked frozen sausage with a date labeled 10/28/24 and use by date of 04/22/24. These findings were confirmed by the Dietary Manager on 10/28/24 during the kitchen investigation.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue the required Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) in a timely fashion for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk of not being informed of her rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifier: #146. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #146 On 10/29/24 at 12:00 PM, a review was completed regarding the beneficiary protection notification liability notice(s) given for Resident #146. Resident #146 was discharged to home following his last covered day of Medicare Part A services. Resident #146's last covered day of Part A Services was on 06/06/24. The facility failed to produce evidence that the required Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was issued. The Form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 state: The NOMNC must be delivered at least two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a written Notice of Transfer / Discharge was provided to the resident and the long-term care Ombudsman for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the long-term care survey process. This had the potential to affect all residents being transferred or discharged . Resident identifier: #27. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #27 A medical record review was completed on 10/3024 at 12:04 PM. The record review revealed Resident #27 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. The record did not reflect the resident/resident's representative was provided with a written Notice of Transfer/Discharge indicating the reason for transfer, the effective date of transfer, the location to which the resident was being transferred, and a statement of the resident's appeal rights. There was also nothing in the electronic medical record to indicate the long-term care Ombudsman had been notified. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that a resident/resident's representative was provided with a written Bed Hold notice for an acute hospital transfer. This was true for two (2) out of two (2) residents reviewed under the hospitalization pathway in the annual Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #27, and #16. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #27 A medical record review was completed on 10/3024 at 12:04 PM. The record review revealed Resident #27 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. There was no evidence in the electronic medical record that the facility had provided Resident #27 or his representative with a written Bed Hold notice. During an interview, on 10/01/24 at 2:55 PM, the Administrator reported the facility could not produce evidence that a Bed Hold notice had been issued for Resident #27's hospitalization on 05/17/24. b) Resident #16 Record review, on 10/30/22 at 9:27 AM, revealed Resident #16 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for residents with newly evident or a possible serious mental disorder. This was true for two (2) out of two (2) residents reviewed under the category of PASARR, during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #6 and #28. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #6 A record review, completed on 10/29/24 at 1:50 PM, revealed Resident #6 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of resident's diagnoses revealed a Major Depression diagnosis with an effective/active date of 11/01/23. There was only one (1) PASARR, dated 11/02/2022, on file. Section III MI/MR Assessment Question #30 had NONE selected regarding any pertinent diagnosis. Additionally, Section V Supplemental Questions #40 had NONE selected regarding any major mental illness (MI) or suspected MI. There was no evidence that a new PASARR had been done when the Major Depression diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (1) of 24 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey process. The facility failed to address Resident #145's preferred bedtime preference. Facility identifier: #145. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a.) Resident #47 A record review, completed on 10/29/24 at 7:40 PM, revealed that Resident #145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] A review of the Recreation Comprehensive Assessment completed for resident, dated 10/18/24, found that the resident had reported she liked to go to bed whenever she wanted. A review of the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #145 showed a focused area of Resident #145 as, While in the facility, resident/patient states that it is important that s/he has the opportunity to engage in daily routines that are meaningful relative to their preferences. Additionally, Resident #145 had the following intervention listed in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and record review, the facility failed to contact the physician; and request a re-assessment of resident's capacity; after a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) evaluation revealed severe impairment. Resident identifiers: #18. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #18: During a brief interview, on 10/28/24, at approximately 11:40 AM, Resident #18 was unable to state when she had entered the facility, or how long she had been there. The resident responded to other questions with unrelated answers. Record review on 10/28/24 at approximately 3:15 PM revealed a document by the resident's physician dated 08/29/24, that stated the resident had capacity. Further record review revealed the following note on 8/23/24 at 10:44 AM by Social Worker (SW) #23: BIMS Summary score: 12.0 Record review further revealed that Resident #18 had been admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for an acute urinary tract infection (UTI). A note by Physician #62 on 9/21/2024 at 8:13 PM stated the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding oxygen administration, and did not monitor residents on oxygen therapy as prescribed. Resident identifiers: #5, and #11. Facility census: 47. Findings include: a) Resident #5 During a brief interview and inspection on 10/28/24 at approximately 11:40 AM, the resident was observed to be on oxygen therapy. The resident continued to be observed throughout the survey, and the following readings were obtained: On 10/28/24 at approximately 11:55 AM an oxygen concentrator was observed to be set to two (2) liters per minute. On 10/29/24 at approximately 3:11 PM the oxygen concentrator was observed to be set to deliver two (2) liters per minute. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 09/29/24 at 7:09 PM that stated: Oxygen at 3 L/min via Nasal Cannula PRN; notify MD if more than 3 shifts in a row below 90% O2 sat or having symptoms of respiratory distress. On October 29, 2024, at approximately 3:14 PM, LPN #29 confirmed that the oxygen was not set to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident representative interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to collaborate with resident trauma survivors, and as appropriate, the resident's family, to identify triggers which may re-traumatize the resident, and develop care plan interventions to minimize or eliminate the effect of the trigger on the resident. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed with a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) diagnosis. Resident identifier: #27. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Resident #27 During a resident representative interview, completed on [DATE] at 11:02 AM, Resident #27's wife reported his PTSD diagnosis stemmed from a work event when he was in his mid-20's. She went on to report that there was a disaster in 1978 in (name) County when a cooling tower under construction at the power plant collapsed, killing 51 construction workers. Resident #27 remembered the incident vividly and recalled people going around and just collecting the severed left arms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file record reviews review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a completed performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Employee identifiers: #49, #5. Facility census: 47. Findings included: a) Employee performance reviews were not available for #49 or #5. During an interview, on 10/30/2024 at 11:34 AM, the Scheduling/payroll Manager #35 confirmed the yearly performance reviews were not on file for employee #49 and #5.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the consulting pharmacist performed a medication regimen review, which included a review of the resident's medical record, at least monthly. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed under the unnecessary medication's pathway throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #27 and #28. Facility census: 47. a) Resident #27 A record review, completed on 10/29/24 at 1:33 PM, revealed there was no evidence in the electronic medical record that a monthly medication regimen review had been completed for Resident #27 during the months of November 2023 and December 2023. During an interview on 10/30/24 at approximately 3:15 PM , the Administrator reported the facility was unable to produce any evidence the monthly medication regimen reviews had been completed by the consulting pharmacist and/or reviewed by the attending physician. b) Resident #28 A record review, completed on 10/29/24 at 1:15 PM, revealed there was no evidence in the electronic medical record that a monthly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate care plan was developed for four (4) of 14 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. For Residents #13 and #20, the care plan was not developed for psychotropic medication. For Resident #7, the care plan was not developed for psychotropic medication and dementia care. For Resident #4, the care plan was not developed for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Resident identifiers: #13, #20, #7, #4. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's physician's orders showed the resident was prescribed the antipsychotic medication quetiapine (Seroquel) upon admission [DATE]. Review of Resident #13's comprehensive care plan reviewed and revised 12/06/22 showed the problem psychotropic drug use. Approaches were to administer Seroquel and Risperidone (also an antipsychotic medication). Another approach was to assess for and incorporate non-pharmaceutical interventions. However,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician identifed and reported medication irregularities for Residents #13, #20, and #7. Additionally, the physician failed to respond to the pharmacist's reported irregularity for Resident #9. These deficient practices had the potential to affect four (4) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident identifiers: #13, #20, #7, #9. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Resident #13 Review of Resident #13's physician's orders showed the resident was prescribed the antipsychotic medication olanzapine (Zyprexa) on 11/24/22. The order did not include the reason Zyprexa was prescribed. Review of Resident #13's progress notes showed the resident had been having behaviors, including aggression. Further review of Resident #13's medical records showed the pharmacist had performed a monthly medication regimen review on 12/05/22. The pharmacist did not identify the lack of diagnosis for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-05 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required members attended the 4th quarter Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents at the facility. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) QAA meeting Review of the monthly sign in sheets by the members attending the meeting with the administrator on 01/05/23 at 10:02 AM, confirmed the required members did not attend the 4th quarter (October, November, and December 2022) meetings. The administrator, director of nursing, infection preventionist, and the physician attended the meetings. However, the facility did not meet the requirements for two (2) additional staff members to be in attendance, the facility had only one (1) additional staff member in attendance. .

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop policies and procedures for immunization of residents against pneumococcal disease in accordance with national standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents eligible to receive pneumococcal vaccination. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Pneumococcal vaccine review The facility's policy and procedure entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine with revision date January 2017 stated the facility would identify residents in need of vaccination with pneumococcal vaccine PCV-13. The PCV-13 vaccination is no longer recommended by the Center for Disease Control (CDC). During an interview on 01/04/23 at 1:54 PM, the Infection Preventionist provided documentation that the facility was providing the pneumococcal vaccine PCV-20 to residents eligible for vaccination. PCV-20 is one of the pneumococcal vaccines recommended by the CDC. The Infection Preventionist acknowledged the facility's policy and procedure regarding pneumococcal vaccines was not up-to-date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders correctly conveyed the resident's/resident's representative's wishes regarding end of life treatment for two (2) of 14 residents reviewed for the care area of advance directives. Resident identifiers: #223 and #125. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Resident #223 Record review found the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 01/02/23, the physician wrote a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order. Review of the medical record found a copy of the [NAME] Virginia Physician's Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form had been completed and signed by the physician indicating the resident was a DNR, comfort focused treatment, and no artificial means of nutrition desired. The POST form had not been signed by the resident or responsible party indicating this was the advance directives desired. There was no indication the resident/responsible party conveyed these wishes for end of life care. On 01/03/23 at 3:18…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures were comfortable for bathing activities. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Water temperatures On 01/03/23 at 12:02 PM, Resident #12 stated, she doesn't always want a shower because the water is too cold. On 01/04/23 at 8:43 AM, the resident's nurse aide (NA) #20 said, we have to turn the water on and let it run for half an hour before it gets warm. She said with the recent cold spell you really had to let the water run. On 01/04/23 at 9:00 AM, the facility's medical secretary #57 provided copies of the resident's bathing schedule and confirmed the Resident receives 2 showers a week, Tuesdays and Saturdays. In December 2022 the resident had 8 opportunities to receive a shower before being diagnosed with COVID-19. The resident received 6 showers. In November 2022 the resident had nine (9) opportunities for showers. The resident received six (6)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of discharge had a discharge planning process in place, involving the resident, which addressed the resident's discharge goals and needs. Resident identifier: #22. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Resident #22 Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was discharged to his home on [DATE]. The admission minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/04/22 noted the resident participated in his discharge plan and was expected to return home. Review of the current care plan found the resident's discharge to the community was not care planned. On 01/04/23 at 12:00 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #63 was unable to locate any discharge paperwork or verification the residents discharge was care planned with the resident. On 01/04/22 at 3:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified no interdisciplinary team (IDT)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a discharge residents recapitulation of stay, which included the course of treatment at the facility. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of discharge during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #22. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Resident #22 Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was discharged to his home on [DATE]. The admission minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/04/22 noted the resident participated in his discharge plan and was expected to return home. On 01/04/23 at 12:00 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #63 was unable to locate any discharge paperwork including a recapitulation of the residents stay at the facility. On 01/04/22 at 3:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified a recapitulation of the residents stay at the facility had not been completed. At the close of the survey, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to administer a medication used to treat high blood pressure per the physician's orders for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier #7. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Resident #7 Record review found a physician order, dated 12/30/22 for Metoprolol tartrate 25 milligrams. Give 1 table twice a day, hold if heart rate is less than 50. The medication administration record (MAR) was reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/05/23 at 9:25 AM, who verified the following information: On 12/31/22 the nurse did not administer the 8:00 PM dose of medication. There MAR did not include the resident's pulse/heart rate was obtained. On 01/01/23 the 8:00 AM dose was again held for a pulse/heart rate of 60. The DON confirmed holding the medication is not per the physician's orders, the medication should have been administer. On 01/02/23 the 8:00 AM dose was held. The nurse made the comment of the MAR, b/p (blood pressure) below parameter. The DON confirmed again the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of mood and behavior. Resident identifier: #20. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Resident #20 Review of Resident #20's physician's orders showed an order for paroxetine (Paxil) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The resident was on this medication since admission to the facility. The medical records contained no assessment of Resident #20's PTSD experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization to the resident. Additionally, Resident #20's comprehensive care plan did not contain a focus/problem related to PTSD. During an interview on 01/05/23 at 08:33 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON)confirmed Resident #20's medical records contained no assessment of the resident's PTSD. The DON also confirmed Resident #20's comprehensive care plan was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medications was free from antipsychotic medication use. Resident identifier: 7. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Resident #7 Record review found the resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital on 1/28/22 with instructions to administer the antipsychotic medication, Olanzapine 2.5 milligrams at bedtime for 30 days. The hospital did not inform the facility of the diagnosis for the use of the medication. The medication was given for 30 days and a new prescription was written on 12/30/22 by the facility physician to continue the medication with no time limits. On 12/01/22 the facility physician saw the resident and noted the antipsychotic, Olanzapine was being given for a diagnosis of anxiety. The facility physician noted the medication was used at the hospital for acute delirium (acute delirium is temporary confusion and a change in consciousness.) When the physician continued the medication on 12/30/22 the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications in the medication storage room were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. One (1) vial of insulin was not dated to indicate when opened. Additionally, several medications in the intravenous cart were past the manufacturer's expiration date. Facility census: 24. a) Medication storage and labeling On 01/04/23 at 8:45 AM, inspection of the medication storage room was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #43 in attendance. The refrigerator in the medication storage room contained a vial of insulin that had not been dated when opened to indicate when the insulin should be discarded. LPN #43 stated she thought the insulin had been opened last night, but confirmed the vial was not dated. Additionally, the cart containing floor-stock intravenous medication and supplies contained the following medications that were past the manufacturer's expiration dates: - Six (6) vials of the antibiotic Ceftriaxone containing powder for reconstitution, expiration date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident's Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) were complete and accurate. This was discovered for two (2) of 14 POST forms reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process. The POST forms for Residents #18 and #4 were incomplete. Resident identifiers: #18 and #4. Facility census: 24. Findings included: a) Resident #18 During a medical record review on 01/04/23, the POST form completed on 11/17/22 for Resident #18 did not have the physician's phone number or the resident's name on the second page. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/04/23 at 11:45 AM, verified the POST form did not have the physician's phone number or the resident's name on the second page. b) Resident #4 During a medical record review on 01/05/23, the POST form completed on 11/16/20 for Resident #4 did not have a trial period for intravenous (IV) fluids or the name and signature of the preparer. An interview with the DON on 01/0/23 at 11:45 AM, verified the POST form was incomplete and did not include a time frame…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2024
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2024
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
ZAC PROPERTIES XI LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
FISHMAN, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2023
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2024
BRENNEMAN, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
HELSEL, JACOBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
HCCF MANAGEMENT GROUP XI LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
SUNDANCE REHABILITATION HOLDCO INCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2024
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-71.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 9%Other / private 28%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$444per resident / day
operating cost
$13,495per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$259per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515184. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next