Teays Valley Center
1390 North Poplar Fork Road, Hurricane, WV 25526 · For profit - Corporation · 124 certified beds · (304) 757-7826 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $24,948 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-19)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 35% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.3% | 14.7% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 7.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 4.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.9% | 15.9% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 39.3% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.2% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.1% | 22.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.3% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.4% | 79.4% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.2% | 11.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.62 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 1.84 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 211 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 101 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.5%CMS range 42.0–56.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.9–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.5%CMS range 6.1–15.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 119.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.49 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-12-19 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview and resident review, the facility failed to provide liquids in the correct consistency to meet the resident's individual needs. This was true for five (5) of five (5) residents that were ordered nectar thickened liquids. This created an immediate jeopardy situation as residents could be physically harmed and suffer possible complications such as aspiration pneumonia by not receiving their liquids in the correct consistency. Resident identifiers: #73, #1, #12, #14, #62. Facility Census: 115 Findings included: a) Resident #73 During the initial resident interview process on 12/10/24 at 9:00 AM, Resident #73 reported he did not like his current diet level of soft food and thickened liquids. The resident reported, I just can't drink the water. Thin water was observed at the bedside with a straw in the cup. The cup was dated 12/2/24. The patient stated he wasn't going to drink it because it did not have ice. Nectar thickened juice was observed at the bedside. The patient reported he received thickened water with his medications. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse on duty for eight (8) hours a day, seven (7) days a week full time. This was found to be true for one (1) of 19 days reviewed during the long term care survey process. Facility census: 120.Findings included: On 04/21/25, the facility Daily Nurse Staffing Form only recorded one Registered Nurse (RN) working 4.0 hours. On 02/18/26 at 12:15 PM, surveyor asked the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) if the posted Daily Nurse Staffing Form was correct. The NHA stated the RN was on call, but came in to work four (4) hours that day. This was additionally verified by a Time Detail Report from the facility's time keeping system.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they had verification that a bed hold policy/notice had been given to one (1) residents and/or their legal representative at the time they were transferred from the facility. Resident identifier: #50. Facility census: 120. a) Resident #50 This resident was on hospital leave from 08/22/25 until 08/27/25. The resident had capacity to make his/her own medical decisions. On 08/22/25, the resident was transferred to an acute care facility for shortness or breath with hypoxemia. A review of the medical record found no bed hold notice. This was requested from the facility on 02/17/26 at 8:45 AM. On 02/17/26 at 10:50 AM, the bed hold notice was provided by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), but it was not signed by the resident. When asked why the resident's signature was not obtained, the NHA acknowledged signatures should have been obtained, or verbal consent documented.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop or implement the care plan for residents care. This was true for three (3) care plans reviewed during this survey. Resident Identifiers: #3, #9 and #63. Facility Census: 120 Findings Included: a) Resident #3 On 02/17/26 at 12:30 PM a record review of medical diagnosis for Resident #3 shows there is a diagnosis of Bipolar. A review of the care plan found no diagnosis of Bipolar under the Focus of impaired/decline in cognitive function in impaired thought processes nor any where on the care plan. On 02/17/26 at 1:00 PM the above was confirmed with the Administrator that the diagnosis of Bipolar was not developed on the care plan. b) Resident #9 On 02/17/26 at 2:40 PM record review of Resident #9s care plan shows his preference as having a shower as he is dependent with all care based on his medical diagnoses. This was also confirmed with his Medical Power of Attorney during a telephone conversation for a representative interview. Record review of the GG-bathing task shows the resident is not receiving his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to administer Activities of Daily Living assistance with residents. This was true for three (3) of five (5) records reviewed. Resident Identifiers: #9, 57, 59. Facility Census:120 . a) Resident #59 02/17/26 1:43 PM a review of Resident #59's hygiene tasks did not indicate the resident refused care, instead it stated the care was not applicable. This made it appear that no attempt was made to provide oral care to resident. This was discussed with nursing home administrator on 02/17/26 at 1:40 PM. b) Resident #57 02/16/26 9:54 AM an observation revealed the resident had severe plaque build up on teeth. The care plan called for teeth brushing twice a day.02/17/2026 12:28 PM during an interview with the DON at 11:48 AM the DON confirmed staff was not checking resident refused and instead checking not applicable. It was discussed that this made it appear the care was not provided as opposed to resident refusing care. c) Resident #9 On 02/16/26 at 9:42 AM during a telephone interview with Resident #9's Medical Power of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview facility failed to ensure food is stored, prepared and served in a sanitary manner, and cleaning of the kitchen is kept at facility policy standards. This observation was from the annual Long Term Care Facility Survey process. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents who received nutrition from the kitchen.Facility census: 120.Findings includea) Policy review titled: Environment Review of procedures reads in part.1- The Dining Service Director will ensure that the kitchen is maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, including floors, walls, ceilings, lighting and ventilation.2- The Dining Service Director will ensure that all employees are knowledgeable in the the proper procedures for cleaning and sanitizing of all food service equipment and surfaces.3- All food contact surfaces will be cleaned and sanitized after each use.4- the Dining Service Director will ensure that a routine cleaning schedule is in place for all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to educate, offer and obtain declination or consent or administered for the COVID-19 2024-2025 and/or COVID-19 2025-2026 immunizations. This was true for five (5) of seven (7) Residents screened for immunizations. Resident Identifiers: #37, #49, #70, #89 and #91. Facility Census: 120.Findings Included: a) Resident #37 On 02/18/26 at 9:30 AM record review shows Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE]. Further record review showed the resident had not been administered nor consented/declination of COVID-19 vaccinations for the 2024-2025 or the 2025-2026 COVID-19 boosters. On 02/18/26 at 10:00 AM the above was confirmed with the Director of Nursing. b) Resident #49 On 02/17/26 at 9:02 AM record review of COVID-19 immunizations for Resident #49 showed this resident had received every vaccination offered to her. However, she had not received the 2024-2025 or the 2025-2026 COVID vaccination. Upon further review and interview with the Director of Nursing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and resident interview, facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program is in place. This was found during the Annual Long Term Care Facility Survey process. Facility census 120. Resident identifiers: #8, #21, #40, #70, #104 and #99. Findings include:a) Policy for Pest Control (received same one from Dining Services and the Facility, the facility one was last updated 02/2025)- Policy statement reads same in both policies: A program will be established for the control of insects and rodents for the Dining Services department.-Procedures review reads: (from Dining Service)1. The Dining Service Director coordinates with the Director of Maintenance to arrange pest control services on a monthly basis, or as needed.2. All food preparation, service, and storage areas will be monitored regularly for any signs of pest/vermin. The center staff will be notified immediately of any concerns.3.Where applicable, bulk foods will be removed from their original packaging and stored in containers with tight fitting lids.-Procedures review reads:(from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they gave a resident the right to have their food preferences honored. Resident identifier: #105. Facility census: 120. a) Resident #105 The resident was first admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #105 was on hospital leave on two occasions, 11/24/25 - 12/7/25 and 01/07/26 - 02/05/26. During an interview with the resident on 02/16/26 at 11:07 AM, when asked about the food at the facility, the resident stated the facility gives her oatmeal and eggs every day, and she does not want these. She further stated she was lactose intolerant. When asked if the facility had asked her about her food preferences, she stated no. Surveyor requested from Dietary Manager #31 on 02/16/26 at approximately 1:50 PM, to see this resident's dietary preferences. The Dietary Manager at 2:25 PM came back to advise the surveyor he had just visited with the resident to obtain her dietary preferences, as none were on file. A review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment for residents. This was found to be true for four (4) of 46 residents reviewed during the long term care process. Resident identifiers: #39, #93, #17, #33. Facility census: 120. Findings included: a) Resident #17 On 02/15/26 at 11:00 AM observation found that the privacy curtain in room [ROOM NUMBER] A, which belonged to Resident #17, was missing several brackets to allow the curtain to be fastened to the overhead track. This caused the curtain to appear be drooping and as if it was about to fall off the track. On 02/15/26 at 11:30 AM the above confirmed with the Administrator. b) Resident #22 On 02/15/26 at 11:05 AM observation found that the privacy curtain in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A, which belongs to Resident #22, was dirty and had dark brown stains on it as well as a white substance. On 02/15/26 at 11:30 AM the above was confirmed with the Administrator. c) Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility to administer the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine as set forth by the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and facility Procedure and Policy #IC605. This was true for two (2) of five (5) RSV immunization records reviewed. Resident Identifiers: #89 and 91. Facility Census: 120 Findings Included: a) Resident #89 On 02/17/26 at 9:10 AM record review of facility immunizations found that Resident #89 had not been administered a Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine. According to the facility policy #IC605, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccinations provided by the Director of Nursing: .The Center will provide the opportunity for patients to receive the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) immunization based on shared clinical decision making between the patient/representative and the provider. In adherence with current recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices (ACIP) as set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The facility obtained consent by Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one (1) resident had orthotics in place for a contracture and range of motion. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for limited range of motion. Resident identifier: #103. Facility Census: 120. a) Resident #103 02/17/2026 3:20 PM a medical record review revealed Resident #103 was supposed to have a Left Resting Hand Splint applied daily as tolerated. The staff were supposed to attempt to get at least 2 fingers under the straps. In the care plan, it stated the resident would refuse the heel protectors but there was no mention of the resting hand splint. In a review of tasks in the care plan,there was no documentation of staff attempting to don the heel protectors. Multiple observations during the survey were performed to see if the resident was wearing any of the orthotics and those observations revealed they were not in place. Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy evaluations and clinical notes make zero mention of using hand splint and suggests heel protectors. Two full months of tasks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the environment is free from accident hazards over which it has control. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #63 Facility Census: 120 Findings Included: a) Resident #63 On 02/16/26 at 11:48 AM while walking through the 500 hall it was observed that Resident #63 was absent from his room and his bed mattress did not have a sheet on it. At that time is was observed the mattress was a standard mattress. Upon stopping Registered Nurse (RN) #93 and asking what type of mattress she would describe on the bed, she stated, a standard mattress. The surveyor ask her if a resident is ordered a defined perimeter mattress, would it look like this? She stated, No, they are built up a little on the edges to assist in prevention of the resident falling out of the bed. At that time it was confirmed with RN #93 that Resident #63 did have an order from the Physician as a fall intervention for a defined perimeter mattress and it was not on his bed. She agreed.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to maintain food items in their personal refrigerators to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. This was true for five (5) of six (6) personal refrigerators observed. Resident Identifiers: #29, #46, #52, #75, #98. Facility Census: 120 Findings Include:On 02/15/26 at 11:00 AM observation of the following personal refrigerators found the temperatures had not been performed on a daily basis. Upon further observation it was found that the refrigerators were dirty, had unlabeled food items in them as well as expired food items, making them unsafe.According to the Food and Nutrition Services Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log that is placed on the front of each personal refrigerator in their room Resident #29's refrigerator had not had the temperature checked daily as required. According to the facility Policy #OPS192 Refrigerators: Patient In Room: .refrigeration must be labeled with the date the food was placed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate and complete medical record related to informing the resident or resident's representative in advance, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers. This was found to be true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #50. Facility census: 120. Findings included: a) Resident #50 This resident has capacity to make his/her own decisions regarding the care or treatment received. A review of the medical record documents the resident to have the following mental health conditions:-ANXIETY DISORDER, UNSPECIFIED, diagnosed on [DATE] at Admission/Readmission-DEPRESSION, UNSPECIFIED, diagnosed on [DATE] at Admission/ReadmissionAdditionally, the resident had an additional diagnosis: -INSOMNIA, UNSPECIFIED, diagnosed on [DATE] at Admission/readmission For these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to administer the Influenza vaccine in a timely manner in order to prevent the spread of influenza and its complication. The facility failed to follow the current recommendation from the Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) guidance for the Influenza vaccine. This was true for one (1) of five (5) Influenza immunization records reviewed. Resident Identifiers: #91. Facility Census: 120 Findings Included: a) Resident #91 On 02/17/26 at 9:30 AM record review for Resident #91 immunizations shows the resident was not administered an influenza immunization. According to the facility Policy #IC600 Influenza Immunization Program the .purpose of the immunization is to prevent the spread of influenza and its complications to employees and other residents.the process is to achieve the highest level of immunity during the peak of flu seasons . Record review shows Resident #91's Patient Representative consented to the influenza vaccine on 01/26/26, however as of 02/17/26 the resident had not received the vaccine. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident had a person-centered comprehensive care plan, developed and implemented, with specific interventions of care to address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for (one) 1 of (thirteen) 13 sampled residents reviewed. Resident #120's care plan failed to address resident being assessed as high fall risk. Census: 115Findings Included: a) Resident #120On 10/21/25 a review of document titled Fall Risk Evaluation completed upon admission [DATE], effective 09/21/24 revealed the following: Resident #120 upon admission had a history of falls (past 3 months): (one)1- (two)2 falls in past (three) 3 months. Level of consciousness / mental status: Disoriented x (three) 3 at all times. Resident is chairbound / continent. Predisposing disease: 1-2 present. Resident had a change in condition in the last 14 days. Resident is prescribed medication that could put him at risk for falls. Fall Risk Score: 15.0On 10/21/25 a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident Interview and Record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was clean and in good repair. This was true for three (3) resident rooms on the 400 and 500 halls. Room identifiers: #404, #407, and #500. Facility census: 115. Findings Include: a) Resident Rooms During and initial tour of the facility on 12/09/24 the following issues were identified in resident rooms: room [ROOM NUMBER] - The blind had brown stains on it. The floor had a pink substance which was not able to be wiped up. The top of the toilet tank did not fit the tank appropriately and the sink was not affixed to the wall completely. room [ROOM NUMBER]- The light fixture in the bathroom was dislodged from the ceiling and was hanging down. The light fixture was also covered in dust. room [ROOM NUMBER]- Resident #24 who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] stated she had been asking them for a year to paint over the flowers they have stuck to the wall. She stated she did not like them and wanted them covered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and observation, the facility failed to provide an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for five (5) of 34 residents. MDS issues were found with Resident #10's hearing assessment, Resident #99's intravenous (IV) access, a cancer diagnosis for Resident #93, the use of insulin for Resident #79 and Resident #56's dental status. Resident Identifiers: #10, #99, #93, #79 and #56. Facility Census: 115. Findings include: a) Resident #10 On 12/10/24 at approximately 11:30 AM, the resident was interviewed and found to be hard of hearing. A record review found the care plan recognized impaired communication due to impaired hearing. The MDS section B dated 12/04/24 indicated the resident's ability to hear is adequate. The medical record was found to not have any information regarding a hearing test or an assessment for hearing aids. On 12/16/24 at 5:15 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the resident did have impaired hearing and a hearing assessment had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans. This was found true for 12 of 34 residents' care plans reviewed. Resident identifiers: #48, #26, #366, #61, #103, #70, #102, #12, #99, #93, #65, and #98. Facility census:115. Findings include: a) Resident #26 A record review on 12/16/24 revealed care plan stated no blood pressure (b/p) or lab stick to right extremities (RE). Further record review of the care plan contained a plan of care for not taking b/p in RE. Focus Resident at risk for decreased ability to perform ADL's in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting, related to: recent illness, hospitalization resulting in fatigue, activity intolerance. Goal Resident will improve current level of function in: bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting by next review as evidence by improved ADL scores. Interventions - No BP(Blood Pressure) or Lab sticks to RE(Right Extremity) Further record review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for five (5) of 34 residents reviewed during the survey process. Care plan revisions were notdone for Resident #31's actual fall, a house supplement for Resident #266, an incorrect diagnosis for Resident #79 and psychiatric diagnoses for Resident #55. Resident Identifiers: #31, #266, #79 and #55. Facility Census: 115. Findings Include: a) Resident #31 On 12/14/24 at 2:08 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #31. The review found the care plan focus of at risk for falls: decreased mobility. However, the resident did have an actual fall on 12/09/24. On 12/16/24 at 12:19 PM, the Administrator was notified and confirmed the care plan had not been revised regarding the actual fall. b) Resident #266 On 12/14/24 at 3:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #266. The review found an intervention under the focus of nutritional risk due to advanced age, therapeutic and mechanically altered diet and dysphagia as house supplement daily as ordered. A further review on the Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #97 who is dependent on staff for showering received at least two showers per week as scheduled. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: 97. Facility Census: 115. Findings Include: a) Resident #97 A review of Resident #97's medical record on 12/11/24 at 1:11 PM, found Resident #97 was scheduled to receive a shower twice a week on Monday and Thursday. From 09/01/24 through 12/11/24 the resident should have received 29 showers. She only received 10 showers; she refused one shower on 12/02/24. She received a shower on the following dates: 09/02/24 09/09/24 10/03/24 10/07/24 10/24/24 10/25/24 11/04/24 11/07/24 11/21/24 and 11/25/24. An interview with corporate Registered Nurse #155 on 12/11/24 at 1:20 PM confirmed Resident #97 did not receive her showers as scheduled. A follow up interview with the Director of Nursing at 1:50 PM on 12/11/24 confirmed if a resident was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with the care and services to enable them to maintain and/or attain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well being. This was true for four (4) of 34 sampled residents. Resident identifiers: #98, #99, #89 and #26. Facility Census: 115. Findings Include: a) Resident #98 During an interview with Resident #98 on 12/09/24 at 12:36 PM, she stated she had a lot of trouble with being Compacted in her bowels and it causes her pain. She stated, I don't know why they can not just give me stool softeners or anything to help with it. A review of Resident #98's medical record on 12/17/24, found the resident on 4 occasions since the beginning of September found on the following occasions Resident #97 went more than three (3) days without having a bowel movement those dates are as follows; 09/17/24, 09/18/24, 09/19/24 10/21/24, 10/22/24, 10/23/24, 10/24/24 11/03/24, 11/04/24, 11/05/24,11/06/24 11/23/24, 11/24/24, 11/25/24, 11/26/24, 11/27/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional maintanence was maintained for Resident #266, #102, #12, #65 and #98. This was true for five (5) of six (6) residents reviewed under the care area of nutrition. Resident Identifiers: #266, #102, #12, #65 and #98. Facility Census: 115. a) Resident #266 On 12/16/24 at 3:25 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #266. The record review found the resident was noted to have significant weight loss. The care plan focus area was at nutritional risk related to advanced age, therapeutic and mechanically altered diet and dysphagia. An intervention listed house supplement day as ordered. (Typed as written.) However, the resident was scheduled to receive the house supplement twice daily. Upon further review, the documentation on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from November, 2024 through December, 2024 indicated zero (0) % was taken on the following dates: --11/09/24 PM --11/10/24 AM and PM --11/12/24 AM and PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of four (4) resident's food allergies were acknowledged. food the Resident (#103) was allergic to was not served and the Resident #70 and #61 tray cards were accurate for documented food allergies. This was true for three (3) of four (4) residents with food allergies. Resident indentifiers: #103, #70, #61. Census: 115. a) Resident #103 Resident #103 reported she was served shrimp on 11/10/24 for the lunch meal. Documentation and patient report stated the resident was allergic to shellfish. On 12/16/ 24 3:08 PM the resident reported she had a severe reaction to shellfish. The resident reported her face swells, she gets puffy patches on skin and her skin is itchy. The resident stated, If severe, I have problems breathing. In the past, I had to go to the hospital. The resident presented the State Surveyor a picture of a meal served 11/10/24 from lunch. The resident was served shrimp which was touching all other foods on the plate per photograph and verbal report. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to store and label food and store utensils and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 115 Findings confirmed by the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 12/09/24 during the initial kitchen investigation initiated at 11:00 AM included: a) A Ziploc bag of soup was opened and not labeled or dated. b) An opened pie crust was not dated. c) A trash bag of French bread loaves tied in a knot that were not labeled or dated. d) Serving utensils were stored in a drawer in the dining room with handles all turned different ways. The CDM reported the cook likes to keep her serving utensils in the drawer. The CDM stated, She keeps this drawer. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated, At one point there were dates. I'll go throw these out. concerning the food items found in the freezer.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and to ensure garbage was not hanging out of the trash can and onto clean pots and pans in the surrounding area. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 115 Findings included: a) Observations made on 12/09/24 at 11:00 AM revealed the following: Garbage from the trash can was overflowing under the handwashing sink in the kitchen beside clean pots and baking sheets. Garbage from the trash can was on the storage rack with clean pots and baking sheets. CDM asked if he should remove the trash can. Food was on tables and floor with dirty napkins and straws in the dining room. The CDM reported housekeeping cleans this after dinner. Dirty silverware on table. The CDM reported breakfast was not served in the dining room. The CDM picked up some of the food and trash off the floor. The kitchen staff were preparing for lunch at this time. These findings were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident record was complete and accurate for four (4) of 34 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey. Resident identifiers: #99, #56, #14 and #55. Facility Census: 115. Findings Include: a) Resident #56 During an observation, of Resident #56, on 12/09/24 at 2:30 PM, during the initial phase of the Long term care survey process it was noted Resident #56 had multiple missing teeth and the teeth remaining were in poor repair. An observation completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/11/24 at 3:00 PM found the resident had multiple missing teeth but did have some teeth remaining. Review of the residents record found a dental consultation dated 04/19/24. This consult indicated the resident had the following missing teeth 1, 2, 7-10, 13-19, 21-32. This indicates teeth 3-6, 11, 12, and 20 were not missing. The most recent oral health evaluation contained in Resident #56's medical record was dated 11/24/23. This assessment indicated Resident #56 was edentulous. This incorrect assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility to provide a notice and/or an accurate notice of the discharge to the resident, resident family and/or the receiving facility to ensure a safe and orderly continuance of care. This was true for Resident #99 on two (2) of three (3) of her transfers to an acute care facility. Resident identifier: #99. Facility Census: 115. Findings include: a) Resident #99 A review of Resident #99's chart on 12/11/24 at 9:24 AM found she was discharged to an acute care facility on 07/19/24, 09/25/24 and 10/05/24. Further review of the record found a transfer form dated 09/25/24. On this form the date of the transfer was listed as 07/19/24. Further review of the record found there was no transfer form for the discharge date of 07/19/24. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) in the afternoon of 12/16/24 she confirmed, there was not a transfer form completed for Resident #99's discharge on [DATE] and the transfer form for 09/25/24 listed the incorrect transfer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate accounting of bed - hold days was provided to Resident #99's healthcare decision maker when the resident was discharged from the facility to an acute care hospital. This was true for three (3) of three (3) discharges reviewed. Resident identifier: #99. Facility Census: 115. Findings include: a) Resident #99 A review of Resident #99's chart on 12/11/24 at 9:24 AM, found the resident was discharged to an acute care facility on 07/19/24, 09/25/24 and 10/05/24. On 12/16/24 the facility was asked to provide the bed -hold notice for each of the three (3) discharges. The facility provided the notices. The notices were blank except for a nurse's signature, the resident's name, medical record number and the state abbreviation. The number of Medicaid bed - hold days available was not completed. The price per day of the bed hold was not completed and there was no indication notice was provided and/or reviewed with Resident #99's responsible party. Therefore, it was not noted if the person responsible wished…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to identify diagnoses for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for the area of pre admission screening and resident review (PASARR). Resident identifiers: #55 and #18. Facility census: 115 a) Resident #18 A diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) were not identified on the most recent PASARR dated 11/14/23 for Resident #18. On 12/17/24 11:45 AM, the State Surveyor reviewed and confirmed the discrepancies with the orders, care plan and PASARR with the Director of Nursing. b) Resident 55 Record review on 12/10/24 at 01:15 PM revealed the following medical diagnoses Schizoaffective Disorder Anxiety Disorder Biploar Disorder Further record review on 12/10/24 revealed the Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) did not identify Bipolar disorder Corporate Registered Nurse # 155 confirmed the PASRR did not identify Bipolar disorder.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities by failing to identify religious preferences in the care plan. This failed practice was found to be true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed under the activities care area during the Long-Term care survey process. Facility census:115 Resident identifier:#48 Findings include: a) Resident #48 On 12/09/24 At 12:34 PM An interview with Resident #48 who stated I can't say anyone comes to invite me to anything, I have gone to a church service and they do ask about bingo but I don't believe in gambling and I don't do that. I can turn on preaching on Sundays, I used to me a minister before i came here Record review completed on 12/10/24 at approximately 10:00 am revealed resident #48's care plan revealed no preferences to religion and being of the Baptist faith or history of being a minister. On 12/10/24 at 12:05 PM the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and observation, the facility failed to evaluate Resident #10's hearing impairment. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed under the care area of activities of daily living. Resident identifier: #10. Facility Census: 115. Findings Include: a) Resident #10 On 12/10/24 at approximately 11:30 AM, the resident was interviewed and found to be hard of hearing. A record review found the care plan recognized impaired communication due to impaired hearing. The medical record was not found to have any information regarding a hearing test or an assessment for hearing aids. On 12/16/24 at 5:15 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the resident did have impaired hearing and a hearing assessment had not been performed since admission to the facility on [DATE] .
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for activities of daily living during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifier: #97. Facility Census: 115. Findings include: a) Resident #97 An observation of Resident #97, on 12/10/24 at 9:06 AM, found she had long toenails on each foot. The nails extended out from the tip of the toe and were curled on the ends. A review of Resident #97's medical record, on 12/11/24, found Resident #97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident did not have any diagnosis which would prevent the staff from providing nail care to the resident. There was no indication in the medical record that the resident had ever seen the podiatrist at the facility. An observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/11/24 at 8:38 am confirmed the residents toe nails were long and needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) with Resident #12 during activities of daily living (ADL) and wound care while in Enhanced-Barrier Precautions (EBP). This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #12. Facility Census: 115. Findings included: a) Resident #12 On 12/12/24 at 9:41 AM, Nurse Aide (NA) #35 was observed providing ADL care for Resident #12. The resident is in EBP due to wounds, suprapubic catheter and a feeding tube. When the resident is in EBP, the staff must wear gown and gloves while providing dressing, bathing, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs and wound care. NA #35 was not wearing PPE while providing the ADL care. Upon entering the room to observe wound care, Registered Nurse (RN) #102 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 did not donn PPE prior to providing wound care. On 12/12/24 at 11:25 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to come to the resident's room. Upon arrival, the EBP signage was turned backward and could not be seen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment. Resident room walls were in disrepair. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Room identifier: #500, # 618 and #316. Facility census: 113. Findings included: a) room [ROOM NUMBER] An observation on 10/30/23 at 1:40 PM, revealed the back wall behind bed B, had large scrapes with deep grooves. An interview on 11/01/23 at 9:58 AM, with the Maintenance Director confirmed this should have been fixed. He stated, the wall was damaged by the power bed. b) room [ROOM NUMBER] An observation on 10/30/23 at 2:12 PM, revealed the back wall behind bed B, had large scrapes with deep grooves. An interview 11/01/23 at 10:07 AM, with the Maintenance Director confirmed this should have been fixed. He stated, the wall was damaged by a wheelchair. c) Room # 316 On 10/30/23 at 12:14 PM, the bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to be scraped and have missing paint on the door and the wall to the left of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident notified of progress toward the resolution. This was true for four (4) of four (4) residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifiers: #45, #6, #2 and #10. Facility census: 113. Findings Included: a) Facility Policy Record review of the facility's policy titled, Grievance / Concern, revision dated 07/19/23, showed: -Upon receipt of grievance/concern, the Grievance/Concern form will be initiated by the staff member receiving the concern. -Upon receipt of the Grievance/Concern Form, the Administrator or designee will document the grievance/concern on the Grievance/Concern Log. -Notify the person filing the grievance of the resolution in a timely manner. -Completed Grievance /Concern forms will be reviewed and retained by the Administrator for a period of no less than three (3) years from the issuance of the grievance decision to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to have the cabinet under the steam table cleaned and sanitized. This has the potential to affect all residents who receive their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility Census: 113. Findings included: a) Steam Table The second kitchen tour on 10/31/23 at 12:05 PM found under the steam table to be unclean and in disrepair. The contact paper was pealing, the plywood was exposed, there was sticky food debris, and an unidentifiable black substance. During an interview with the kitchen manager and corporate dietary manager they confirmed the steam table was not clean was in disrepair. They indicated the kitchen had notified the maintenance department but the issue has not yet been fixed. During an interview on 11/01/23 at 9:45 AM the Maintenance Director verified under the steam table would be hard to clean and sanitize. He stated, he would get it fixed this day.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility record review and interview the facility failed to explain the Binding Arbitration Agreement in a form and manner residents or Resident Representatives can understand. This has the potential to affect all residents or Residents Representatives that sign a Binding Arbitration Agreement. Facility Censes: 113. Findings included: a) Binding Arbitration Agreement A facility record review found multiple Residents or Residents Representatives had signed a Binding Arbitration Agreement. During an interview 11/01/23 at 2:30 pm, the admission Coordinator was unable to explain a Binding Arbitration Agreement accurately. She stated, the Resident could not consult or obtain a lawyer, there was only one Arbitrator, genesis health care would choose the Arbitrator and they were giving up their right for a lawyer. When the admission Coordinator was asked questions about Binding Arbitration Agreement, she was unable to explain. The admission Coordinator at this time stated, Residents don't usually ask questions about the form. She continued to say she would better familiarize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The glucometer was not cleaned with a cleaning solution approved by the manufacturer. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents residing in the unit who receive blood glucose monitoring by fingerstick. Resident identifiers: #324, #178, #179, #51. Facility census: 113. Findings included: a) Glucometer cleaning The facility's procedure titled Fingerstick Glucose Measurement, with an effective date of 01/01/04 and revision date of 06/15/22, stated, Clean and disinfect the blood glucose meter after use with EPA [environmental protection agency] approved disinfectant, following manufacturer's instructions. On 11/01/23 at 8:19 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 was observed performing fingerstick blood glucose monitoring using a glucometer. The glucometer brand was EVENCARE G2. Following the completion of the procedure, LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the correct discharge destination of Resident #123. This is true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalization. Resident Identifier: #123. Facility Census: 113. Findings Included: a) Resident #123 On 10/31/23 at 1:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #123. The review found the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge Return Not Anticipated dated 09/05/23 listed the discharge destination of acute hospital. However, the resident was discharged to home with family. The following progress note dated 09/05/23 at 5:07 PM states, Resident discharging home at this time via (Name of ambulance company). Daughter at bedside. Went over discharge paperwork including medication list, no questions concerns. No s/s (signs/symptoms) of acute distress prior to leaving. No complaints/needs. In good spirits. Medications called into (Name of pharmacy) per request. Skin clean, warm, dry with no acute changes. On 10/31/23 at 2:10 PM, Clinical Care Reimbursement (CCR) nurse #129 confirmed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to coordinate with the appropriate, State-designated authority, to ensure individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs.This is true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: 12. Facility Census: 113. Findings Included: a) Resident #12 At approximately 2:40 PM on 10/31/23, a review of Resident #12's records were conducted. During this review, it was determined the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with no diagnosis of a Level II mental illness. Record review indicated Resident #12 was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder on 3/13/17 and the PASARR was not revised to reflect this diagnosis. At approximately 3:09 PM on 10/31/23, an interview was conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) #28 and the Administrator #70. The administrator and IDON confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan regarding a wound infection and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy for Resident # 329. This is true for one (1) of 26 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident #329. Facility Census: 113. Findings Included: a) Resident #329 On 11/01/23 at 12:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #329. The review found a care plan had not been developed regarding a wound infection and IV antibiotic therapy for Resident #329. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident arrived to the facility with a physician's order for Ertapenem Sodium Injection Solution 1 (one) Gram use 500mg (milligram) IV every day through 11/17/23 for an infection which was chronic multifocal osteomyelitis of the left foot and ankle. On 11/01/23 at 1:37 PM, the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) was notified and confirmed the care plan was not developed regarding the wound infection nor the IV antibiotic therapy. No further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan when residents' needs and conditions changed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect two (2) of 26 residents reviewed in the long-term care center. Resident identifiers: #54 and #70. Facility census: 113. Findings included: a) Resident #54 Resident #54 had diagnoses of cerebral palsy, aphasia, and severe intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #54's comprehensive care plan showed a focus related to activities. An intervention was, I enjoy watching/listening TV. [Typed as written.] Resident #54 was observed on the following days and at the following times: - 10/31/23 at 11:59 AM - 11/01/23 at 10:34 AM - 11/01/23 at 2:07 PM The resident's television was turned off at the time of these observations. Resident #54's Recreation Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] stated it was very important for the resident to watch or listen to television. Resident #54's activity participation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities, by failing to make appointments and arrange transportation to and from the office of the practitioner. This is true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #424. Facility Census: 113. Findings Included: a) Resident #424 At approximately 12:55 PM on in 10/30/23, an interview with Resident #424 revealed they had been trying to obtain an appointment with an audiologist for almost a year. Resident #424 states they have hearing problems and it is critical they see an audiologist in a timely manner and they want to go outside of the facility to see the audiologist. Resident #424 stated, they had brought the appointment to the attention of the nurses, nursing aides, and social worker, but had been unable to obtain an appointment up to this point. At approximately 3:15 PM on 10/31/23, an interview was conducted with Social Services Director (SSD) #28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to dispose of expired over-the-counter(OTC) medications appropriately and store medication in a safe and secure location. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility Census: 113. Findings Included: a) Expired Medication On [DATE] at 8:13 AM, while observing medication administration, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #79 needed an over-the-counter (OTC) medication from central supply. While in central supply, an observation found four (4) unopened bottles of Calcium Citrate which expired in July, 2023. On [DATE] at 8:15 AM, LPN #79 confirmed the OTC medication was expired. On [DATE] at 8:20 AM, the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) was notified and confirmed the medication should have been disposed of upon expiration. b) Unsecured Medication On [DATE] at 8:20 AM on the Blue hall, one (1) bottle of Zinc was found sitting on top of the medication cart. There was no staff member near the medication cart. Upon discovery, the IDON was at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for Resident #41. This is true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident Identifier: #41. Facility Census: 113. Findings Included: a) Resident #41 On 10/31/23 at 1:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #41. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility multiple times. Upon reviewing the transfer forms, the following had an incorrect date and time of transfer: --05/02/23 at 1:42 PM had the incorrect transfer date and time of 04/29/23 at 10:40 PM --05/29/23 at 6:53 AM had the incorrect transfer date and time of 05/02/23 at 2:19 PM --07/02/23 at 5:30 PM had the incorrect transfer date and time of 06/15/23 at 7:50 PM --07/09/23 at 7:40 AM had the incorrect transfer date and time of 07/02/23 at 5:44 PM On 10/31/23 at 1:30 PM, the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) was notified and confirmed the transfer dates and times were incorrect. No further information was obtained during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$24,948 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $24,948 — penalty dated 2024-12-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/15/2022 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| DUFFER, CASSIDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/23/2025 |
| HOLMES, JEFFREY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/23/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 35% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515106. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.