Logan Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 65.2 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide food in the correct consistency per physician orders and resident's individual needs for Resident # 168 resulting in a choking incident requiring emergency response and hospitalization. This created an immediate jeopardy situation. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. The facility had corrected this situation that began on 12/04/24 on 12/09/24. This issue is cited at past noncompliance. Resident identifiers: #168, #33, #51, #22, #25, #47, #39, #35, and #59. Facility Census: 63. Findings included: a) Resident #168 Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) documentation revealed Resident #168 had a choking episode on 12/04/24. The resident was transferred to an acute care facility and admitted . The resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 12/11/24. It was reported that the resident was served broccoli that was not chopped. According to the FRI, the resident indicated and gestured he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, staff interview, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Facility Policy, and observation,` the facility has failed to ensure and establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to store clean linens in a safe, clean and sanitary manner. Furthermore, the facility failed to appropriately place Residents #59 and #28, diagnosed with Multiple Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO), in contact precautions, and they also failed to use proper Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) while providing care. In addition, the facility failed to have PPE equipment readily available for staff. Resident #59 currently has a active diagnosis of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobactiaceae (CRE) in his urine. There were not any signs on the door to alert staff or visitors of the type of precautions to use. Resident #28…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-09-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the resident's choices, related to pain management. Resident #12 complained his medication was administered late frequently which caused him to suffer unnecessarily. This demonstrates actual physical harm for Resident #12. This was true for one (1) of three (3) reviewed for the care area of Pain. Resident identifier: Resident #12. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #12 During an interview on 9/25/23 at 12:09 PM, Resident #12 stated, I can't get my medications when needed. I am supposed to take my medicine before bedtime, but it is closer to midnight before I receive them. During an interview, on 09/25/23 at 2:31 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, (Resident #12's name) has been on comfort measures since admission on [DATE]. During a record review on 09/25/23 at 3:00 PM, Resident #12's medical records…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe operating essential equipment for the facility's ice machine and Resident 21's bed. Resident identifier: #21. Facility census: 63. Findings: a) On 06/08/25 at approximately 3:48 p.m., an observation of the ice machine located in the dining area revealed the drainage line coming from the ice machine goes directly into the floor drain. On 06/08/25 at approximately 3:53 p.m., an interview with the facility's Maintenance Director and Regional Maintenance Director verified this finding. This finding was also acknowledged with the facility Administrator upon exit on 06/11/25 at approximately 1:00 p.m. b) Resident #21 On 06/09/25 at approximately 3:29 p.m., a record review of Resident #21 revealed a progress note dated 02/27/24 by Employee #21. The note revealed that the resident's bed had been dysfunctional for 3 days after witnessing Resident #21 fall on 02/27/24. On 06/09/25 at approximately 4:09 p.m., an interview with the facility Administrator verified that Resident #21's bed was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report alleged physical abuse to the proper state agencies within the required two (2) hour timeframe. This is true for one (1) of seven (7) residents reviewed under the care area of abuse. Resident identifier: #32. Facility Census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #32 On 06/09/25 at 1:00 PM, a review of the facility policy entitled, Abuse Prohibition was completed. The review found in section 7.2 of the facility policy states, Report allegations involving abuse (physical, verbal, sexual, mental) not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. On 06/09/25 at 11:21 AM, a facility-reported incident (FRI) dated 03/05/25 regarding an allegation of physical abuse on 03/04/25 was reviewed. The review found the alleged physical abuse was not reported to the proper state agencies within the required two (2) hour time frame. The alleged incident took place on 03/04/25 at 10:45 PM; and was not reported until 03/05/25 at 9:15 AM. The timeframe from the alleged event to the time of reporting was 10 and 1/2 hours. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan in the area of fall prevention for Resident #42. Resident identifier: #42 Facility census: 63. Findings include: a) Resident #42 Resident #42 had a fall on 04/17/25. Resident #42 was assessed with bruising to forehead, ankle and knee. X-rays were ordered for the ankle and knee and neuro checks were ordered. Resident was sent to the local ER on [DATE] and was diagnosed with cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of right middle cerebral artery. Resident #42's medical record revealed a fall risk evaluation was performed on 03/12/25 and a care plan review started on 03/7/25. Fall risks were identified as a focus area, goals were to have no falls with major injury and minor injury. However, the Interventions were Encourage resident to consume all fluids during meals. Observe for and report signs and symptoms of nausea/vomiting, and observe for changes in medical status, pain status, mental status and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to be free from accidents/hazards by leaving Resident #21 in a broken bed. Resident identifier #21. Facility census 63. Findings include: a) On 06/09/25 at approximately 3:29 p.m., a record review for Resident #21 revealed a progress note dated 02/27/24 by Employee #21. The note reflected that the resident's bed had been dysfunctional for 3 days after witnessing Resident #21 fall on 02/27/24. On 06/09/25 at approximately 4:09 p.m., an interview with the facility Administrator verified that Resident # 21 bed was malfunctioning and employee #21 did not remove the malfunctioning bed out of service on 02/24/24. This finding was also acknowledged by the Administrator upon exit on 06/11/25 at approximately 1:00 p.m.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to Resident handwashing and to maintain a separation between the clean and soiled area of the laundry room to prevent contamination by airflow. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Dining Room An observation during dining, on 08/07/23 at 12:44 PM, revealed the residents in the dining room, did not receive hand hygiene prior to or during the lunch meal tray pass. A second observation on 08/08/23 at 11:40 AM through 12:30 PM found no hand hygiene was offered prior to the noon meal. During an interview, on 08/08/23 at 12:18, with Nurse Aide (NA) #29 verified no hand hygiene was completed prior to the meal service. She stated that they usually use hand wipes for the residents. She stated that she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing activity program designed to meet the interests of and support the well-being of each resident specifically premeal activities not being provided. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Dining observations An observation of Dining Room meal service on 08/07/23 from 11:42 AM to 12:15 PM, found 25 residents sitting with dining room waiting for their noon meal, six (6) residents appear to be sleeping . No Pre meal activities were provided. A second observation of the dining room on 08/08/23 from 11:35 AM to 12:30 PM, found 27 Resident's sitting around the room with no premeal activities being provided. During an interview on 08/08/23 at 1:27 PM with the Administrator confirmed staff should be present in the dining room providing premeal activities, such as soft music, television, or socialization.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) attendance sheets and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the required QAPI meetings were held, and all required QAPI committee members were in attendance. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents in the facility. Facility census: 64. Findings included: Review of the QAPI attendance sheets found no evidence meetings were held the last two (2) quarters of 2022 (July, August, September-3rd quarter and October, November, and December 2022- 4th quarter) found no sign in sheets and/or minutes. Additionally, the Infection Preventionist (IP) failed to attend the QAPI meetings on 02/23/23 and 03/23/23. On 08/08/23 at 2:55 PM in an interview the administrator confirmed the QAPI meetings and minutes had disappeared, and there was no evidence of meetings held in 2022. She also confirmed the IP had not attended the meeting on the above-mentioned dates.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity regarding meal service. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Dining Room During an observation of meal services on 08/07/23 from 12:01 PM through tray pass revealed Resident's in the dining room seated together did not received their trays at the same time. A second dining observation of meal services on 08/08/23 from 12:01 PM through tray pass revealed Resident's in the dining room seated together did not received their trays at the same time. During an interview on 08/08/23 at 12:25PM the Dietary Account Manager #83 verified that the Residents seated together should be served at the same time.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of a resident's transfer to the hospital. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization. Resident identifier: #33. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #33 Review of Resident #33's medical records showed in the last 120 days the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 04/24/23. On 08/08/23 at 11:12 AM, the Administrator provided a report of discharges from the facility for the dates 03/16/23 to 06/11/23 and provided evidence the information was provided to the Ombudsman on 06/12/23. Resident #33's transfers to the hospital on [DATE] and 04/23/23 were not on the report. The Administrator confirmed the Ombudsman was not notified regarding Resident #33's transfers to the hospital on [DATE] and 04/23/23. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) in the care area of restraints and antipsychotic medication. Resident identifier: Resident # 24, and #50. Facility census 64. Findings included: a) Resident #24 A review of the medical record for Resident #24 discovered there was an order for a Merry [NAME] to be used, dated 06/26/23. A review of the MDS found nothing was marked for Restraints. During an interview on 08/08/23 at 2:29 PM, with Clinical Care Reimbursement (CCR) #1 agreed the use of a Merry walker was not on the MDS and should have been added. On 08/09/23 at 8:45 AM the Administrator made aware of the information above. b) Resident #50 Review of Resident #50's medical records showed the resident had been receiving the antipsychotic medication aripiprazole (Abilify) since returning to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 07/24/23 showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,981 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,981 — penalty dated 2025-06-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $609K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV