Madison, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 116 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 55.1 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #65's Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form was honored by directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1).This has to potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Resident identifiers: 65.The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 4:35 PM on [DATE]. The facility submitted their first abatement plan of correction (POC) at[DATE] at 5:29 PM. The state agency requested changes and the second abatement POC was submitted [DATE] at 6:01PM. The abatement POC was accepted by the state agency at 6:05 PM on [DATE]. After observation of the implementation of the abatement POC, the IJ was abated on [DATE] at 10:20 AM. The IJ started on [DATE] and ended on [DATE].The facility's approved abatement POC consisted of the following:Correction action for area of concern-Resident #65 was found…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not develop avoidable pressure ulcers. Resident #8 returned from the emergency room with bilateral leg immobilizes. The facility failed to implement a plan to prevent Resident #8 from developing pressure ulcers because of the leg immobilizers. Resident #8 developed bilateral unstageable pressure ulcers to both calves. The wounds have worsened and required the resident to be hospitalized and undergo debridement procedures on each of the wounds. The resident has voiced concerns and fears that his right leg will need an amputation because of the wound. The state agency (SA) determined the failures related to Resident #8 placed him and any other residents with medical devices such as leg braces in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation. The SA notified the facility of the IJ at 6:30 PM on 11/19/24. The SA accepted the facility's plan of correction (POC) at 8:09 PM on 11/19/24. After the SA observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident #8 requested the facility transport him to the bank in the facility van. The facility had decided prior to Resident #8's request to go to the bank that power wheelchairs could not be used on the facility van any longer. As a result of this decision the resident requested his manual wheelchair and chose to use the manual wheelchair in the van to go to the bank. The resident had not been in his manual wheelchair for at least a year prior to this. Since then, he had lost use of his legs and was paralyzed in both lower extremities. The resident slid from the wheelchair while on the van. A nurse aide was with him and another nurse aide responded to the scene where the van had pulled over after the resident slid from the wheelchair. The resident denied pain (please note the resident is a paraplegic and cannot feel his legs.) He stated he did not want to go to the hospital. The two (2) Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for resident rooms/bathrooms on the 100 hall.This was a random opportunity for discovery. Rooms: 101, 102, 103, and 104. Facility census: 52.Findings included:a) Observations:Upon survey entrance walkthrough on 01/19/26 at 1:30 PM, the following issues were observed:room [ROOM NUMBER]:-Bathroom brownish smears behind toilet handrail dark red smeared substance on toilet hand rail -brown substance smeared behind toilet hand rail room [ROOM NUMBER]:-Room: Sticky yellowish substance on the wall behind resident's bed-Bathroom: observed dusty residue build up on base of empty hand sanitizer dispenser Room103:-bathroom observed smeared brownish substance on wall behind toilet handrails and on the wall under the soap dispenser-blackish substance around toilet base Room104:-bathroom observed cobwebs and built up of hair and dusty residue under the sink.-black substance build-up around baseboards…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to properly store food in accordance with professional standards of practice. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who are served food from the kitchen. Facility census: 52 Findings included:a) On 01/19/26 at 11:45AM, during Initial Brief Tour of Kitchen, opened boxes of food unclosed and left open to air was observed in the freezer. This was true for:frozen sausage links, frozen biscuit dough. and frozen pizza dough. b)The Utensils were not placed in the utensil drawer in all of the same direction but were observed to be scattered in different directions.c) A bottle of onion spice on the shelf above the stove was left open to air.On 01/20/26 at 1:00 PM a review facility policy labeled HCSG Policy 019, Food Storage: Cold Foods. Procedures, number 5 stated All foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination.d) Tray Line Prep Observation:On 01/19/2026 at approximately 11:40AM, while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible in regards to bed safety. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #28. Facility census: 52. Findings included:a) Resident #28During an initial tour of the facility an observation, completed on 01/18/26 at 12:26 PM, revealed Resident #28 was lying on a bariatric mattress (a heavy-duty, wider hospital-grade mattress) that was placed on a standard bed frame. Approximately 12 inches were hanging over the frame, creating an unsupported area for the resident which had potential to rise to the resident sustaining an injury from a fall off the bed. During an interview on 01/18/26 at 12:45 PM, the Director of Nursing verified the mattress was hanging over the frame of the bed and stated that it should not be larger than the frame. The DON stated that she would get the Maintenance Director to assess the issue.On 01/21/2026 at 10:35 AM, the Maintenance Assistant stated that he replaced the bariatric mattress,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing staff form posted was accurate and complete. The daily census was not included on the posting for three (3) of four (4) days observed. Facility census: 52.Findings included:Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 11:15 AM, the daily nursing staff form was observed to be incomplete for January 17, 2026, January 18, 2026, and January 19, 2026. The daily census was not included on the posting for these days. During an interview on 01/18/26 at approximately 11:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) concurred the nurse staff posting forms had not been accurately completed.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to unsanitary practices. This failed practice was a random opportunity of discovery. Resident identifier: #10 Facility census: 52.Findings Included:a) Dining Room ObservationOn 01/19/26 at approximately 12:15PM, during dining room observations, it was observed that Employee #23 failed to properly sanitize her hands between assisting with one resident's wheelchair and then assist in feeding Resident #10 without washing her hands and changing her gloves.b) Staff Interviews-On 01/19/26 at 12:45PM in an interview with Employee #23, she acknowledged she did not use properly sanitizer her hands before returning to feed Resident #10.-During an interview with the Corporate Kitchen Manager on 01/20/26 at approximately 11:15 AM, he stated he was aware of the lack of hand sanitization in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan regarding food dislikes for Resident #23, a skin condition for Resident #14, behaviors and emotional status for Resident #8 and prevention of pressure ulcers for Resident #4. This was true for four (4) of 21 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #23, #14, #8 and #4. Facility Census: 54. Findings Included: a) Resident #23 On 11/18/24 at 11:45 AM, an interview was held with Resident #23. The resident stated, They sent my salad with chicken on it .I detest chicken and turkey .it's on my ticket. On 11/18/24 at 12:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #23. The review found the care plan did not list the food dislikes under any focus area on the care plan. On 11/21/24 at 9:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the dislikes were not listed in the care plan. b) Resident #14 On 11/20/24 at 10:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #14. The review found the care plan had a focus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the Pharmacist failed to accurately review and complete monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR). This failed practices was found to be true for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for the unnecessary medication care area during the Long Term Care Survey process. Resident identifiers: #47, #8, #33. Facility census: 54. Findings included: a) Resident # 47 During record review on 11/20/24 the following orders were noticed for Resident #47 who was ordered Nothing by Mouth (NPO): (as written in medial record) NPO (nothing by mouth) diet, NPO texture, NPO consistency Diet Active 10/17/2024 09:54 Acetaminophen Tablet 325 MG (Acetaminophen) Give 2 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for Mild Pain More than 3 doses in 48 hours, notify physician/advanced practice provider(APP).Do not exceed 3g/day. (standing order) Acetaminophen Tablet 325 MG Give 2 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Temp 100F or above Notify Physician/Advanced Practice provider. Do not exceed 3g/day Milk of Magnesia Suspension 400 MG/5ML (Magnesium Hydroxide) Give 30 ml by mouth as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from significant medication errors. This was a random opportunity for discovery found during the investigation of a facility complaint. Resident Identifiers: Resident # #160, #11, #15, #14, #13, #161, #3, #59, #23, #164, #24, #35, #165, #166. Facility Census: 54. Findings included: a) 07/31/24 A review of a complaint received by the state agency on 08/02/24 and reviewed during a complaint survey which began on 11/18/24 found on 07/31/24 several residents missed there night time medication. A review of the incident reports found the nurse had reported to work after being involved in an accident. It was observed she was not able to perform her duties, so she was sent home, and another nurse came to take her place about an hour after she left. The nurse before leaving gave a report to the nurse who was working at the facility, but it was not clear if the medications had been administered or not. Because it was not clear if the medication had been administered the oncoming nurse who arrived…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for the noon time meal on 11/18/24. This was true for 10 residents who were eating their noontime meal in the dining room on 11/18/24. Facility Census: 54 Findings Included: a) Noon time Meal Observation An observation of the noon meal service on11/18/24 found the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was serving the meal from a steam table located in the dining room. Near the end of the service, it was noted the residents were no longer being served broccoli with their meal. The residents were only served pinto beans, pan fried potatoes, and corn bread. An interview with the CDM immediately following the meal service confirmed she ran out of broccoli. When asked why there was not enough broccoli for all the residents she stated, I must of over scooped (gave too much) you made me nervous. When asked how many residents did not receive broccoli, she stated 10 residents. A review of the menu for this meal found each resident should have received one half of a cup of broccoli.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate for 18 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident identifiers: #4, #209, #47, #23, #8, #160, #11, #15, #14, #13, #161, #3, #59, #164, #24, #35, #165, and #166. Facility Census: 54. Findings Included: a) Resident #4 An interview with Resident #4 on 11/20/24 at approximately 4:45 PM, Resident #4 stated, I have to wear this brace all the time. I changed braces recently because the bar on the other rubbed a blister on my lower leg, but it is healed now. When asked if the facility staff remove the brace daily to look at his skin he stated, Yes they take it off every day and look at my skin underneath it and then put it back on. A review of Resident #4's treatment administration record for the months of October 2024 and November 2024 found no documentation to indicate the resident's brace was removed and the skin was checked for integrity. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) in the morning of 11/21/24 when asked if they were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$57,113 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-01-21
• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-11-21
• $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-11-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV