Willows Center
723 Summers Street, Parkersburg, WV 26101 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (304) 428-5573 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.8% | 14.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.5% | 7.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.1% | 15.9% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.9% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.1% | 97.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.2% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.6% | 22.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.6% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 73.8% | 79.4% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.1% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.8% | 11.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.49 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 1.84 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 135 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 30.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.8%CMS range 30.8–49.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.9%CMS range 8.6–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 30.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 26.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 9.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.8%CMS range 7.2–15.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 93.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for three (3) of five (5) resident rooms reviewed during the complaint survey process. The facility failed to keep the Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners (PTACs) in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBER] in good condition. Facility Census: 92.On 03/10/26 at approximately 9:15 .a.m., the State Agency (SA) observed debris in the upper vent of the PTAC unit in resident room [ROOM NUMBER].On 03/10/26 at approximately 9:18 a.m., the SA observed debris and a black like substance in the upper vent of the PTAC unit in resident room [ROOM NUMBER].On 03/10/26 at approximately 12:30 p.m., the SA observed debris in the upper vent of the PTAC unit in resident room [ROOM NUMBER].During an interview on 03/10/26 at approximately 1:15 p.m. the facility Administrator verified these findings. These findings were also acknowledged with the Administrative staff upon exit on 03/10/26 at approximately 3:30 p.m.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. One (1) of two (2) dumpsters was found to be overflowing with garbage bags, making it impossible for the dumpster lid to properly close. The other dumpster had sliding doors that were not completely closed. This was a random opportunity for discovery that has the potential to affect every resident at the facility. Facility census: 92. Findings included:a) Disposal of Garbage / Refuse was not properly contained in dumpsters with lids or otherwise covered. On 12/16/25 at 8:38 AM, two surveyors asked the Director of Dining to take them to the trash dumpsters located outside. She acknowledged the dumpster lids should be closed at all times when not in use, and they were not.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review and staff interviews the facility failed to report the results of investigations within approved time frames to the state survey agency(SSA). This was discovered during the Long term care survey process, during the review of Facility reported incidents (FRIs). This was found to be true for one (1) out of thirty (30) residents reviewed. Resident #74 and #108. Census: 92 Finding include: a) Resident #74 During record review of Facility reported incidents (FRIs) on 12/17/25, file with this FRI #242295 was missing the five day follow up. The initial report was received 01/06/25. This would make the five day needing to be submitted by 01/11/25 at 11:59 PM at the latest. There was no record of it anywhere in the file or of a attempt to transmit a copy to anyone that is required to be notified ie. Fax transmittal sheet or email attachment by that deadline time. The file only contained four (4) statements, none are dated or signed by anyone either interviewed or doing the interviewing. As well as two (2) Performance improvement plans (PiPs), both were non…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, and operation policy the facility failed to take actions to thoroughly investigate an alleged violation related to, abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, and take corrective action following the investigation. Resident identifier #1, #108, #109, #98, #74, #105, #104, and #102. Facility census: 92. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, showed: - The Administrator, or designee, is responsible for operationalizing policies and procedures that prohibit abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, injury of unknown source, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. The center must ensure that all staff are aware of reporting requirements and must support an environment in which covered individuals report a reasonable suspicion of a crime. - Immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected or alleged abuse, mistreatment, or neglect the administrator of designee will perform the following. - Report allegations involving abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #38, #39. Facility census: 92.a) Resident #39 An electronic medical record review was completed on 12/18/25 at 11:00 AM. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #52's care plan identified the following: A Focus Area, initiated on12/08/25, which stated: Resident/Patient requires assistance/is dependent for ADL care in _______________ (specify: bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting) related to: Recent_______ (illness, fall, hospitalization, etc.) resulting in _______ (fatigue, activity intolerance, confusion, etc.) A Goal Area, initiated on 12/08/25, which stated: Resident/Patient will improve current level of function in:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident, and staff interview. The facility failed to assist dependent Residents with activities of daily living (ADL's) in accordance with the resident's assessed needs for care. This is true for three (3) of eight (8) residents reviewed for ADL's care. Resident Identifiers: #30, #49 and #72. Facility census: 92. Findings Included:a) Resident #49 On 12/15/23 at 11:28 AM Resident #49 stated that she does not get showers or baths as ordered or her preference. She stated that she is supposed to get two showers a week. She continued to state that the staff say they don't have enough staff to give her a shower. A review of Resident #49's ADL documentation found only two (2) showers on 11/21/25 and 12/09/25 also noted seven bed baths noted in 30 days. No Refusals noted.During an Interview on 12/17/23 at 10:30AM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no documentation that Resident #49 received showers as scheduled. b) Resident #30Observation on 12/15/25 at 12:23 PM of Resident #30 found his hair appeared oily, dirty and uncombed.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect five (5) of 28 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. For Resident #3, the facility failed to obtain vital signs as ordered by the physician. For Resident #69, the facility failed to follow physician-ordered medication parameters. For Resident #96, the facility failed to perform neurological checks after unwitnessed falls. For Residents #38 and #72, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care for residents receiving hospice services. Resident Identifiers: #3, #69, #96, and #38. Facility Census: 92. Findings included: a) Resident #3 On 09/28/25 at 9:16 PM, a nursing progress note stated Resident #3 reported chest pain. The resident's pulse rate was 104 beats per minute and irregular. The on-call provider was notified. According to the progress note, the provider ordered vital signs every four (4)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide services to dialysis residents in accordance with professional standards of practice. There was no documentation that the resident's dialysis access site was monitored for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of dialysis. Resident Identifiers: #69. Facility Census: 92. Findings included:a) Resident #69 The facility's policy titled Dialysis: Hemodialysis External Catheter Evaluation and Maintenance with effective date 07/01/01 and revision date 07/01/25 stated, The licensed nurse is responsible for evaluating and maintaining the external hemodialysis catheter site for patients with an external hemodialysis catheter. The facility's policy titled Dialysis: Hemodialysis (HD) Provided by a Certified End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Facility with effective date 10/01/18 and revision date 08/07/23 stated, After receiving dialysis, Center staff must provide monitoring and documentation of: the patient's vascular access site(s) to observe for bleeding or other complications. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Multiple medications stored in a medication cart and the medication room were unlabeled and undated. This practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 92.Findings include:a) Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]An observation of the facility's Main Medication Room, on [DATE] at 9:30 AM, revealed a refrigerator contained the following:-One (1) box Influenza Vaccine open, not dated or labeled.-One (1) opened container of Hepatitis B Vaccine not dated or labeled.-One (1) opened container of Covid 19 Vaccine not dated or labeled.An interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #21, on [DATE] at 9:30 AM, revealed the medications should have been labeled with a name and an open date as soon as they were opened by the staff.b) 100 Hall Medication roomAn observation of the 100 Hall Medication,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on food tray temperatures and resident interviews, the facility failed to serve food to residents that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature. Based on resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure hot foods were served hot and cold foods were served cold. This failed practice was true for four (4) of five (5) hallways tested for milk temperatures on the beverage carts and food tray temperatures for one (1) of one (1) meal trays tested throughout the survey process Facility census: 92.a) This surveyor asked the Director of Dining to temp the milk that was located on the west hall beverage cart on 12/15/25 at 12:45 PM. The temp was 54 degrees F. The Director of Dining acknowledged the temp was above the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) food code temp of 41 degrees F. On 12/17/25 at 12:15 PM the surveyor asked employee #152 for the temperatures of the lunch menu food items. He stated that the cook writes them on the production sheet. He then gave me a copy of the production sheet and stated that the cook did not write them down. 12/15/2025 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 62 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews and staff interviews, this facility failed to ensure meal preferences were obtained, updated and followed per policy and or best practice as provided per District Manager for Food and Nutrition. This was a random finding during the Annual Long Term Care Survey Process. Facility Census 92 Resident identifiers #58, #31, #37Findings include: 12/15/2025 12:00PM , Resident #58. Resident interview The food is terrible, they have not updated any meal preferences with me, I asked the manager almost (3) three months ago to come talk with me 12/15/25 12:50PM , Resident #58, meal served, Resident meal was Turkeyburger, with lettuce, tomato and baked beans on plate, per resident This is what I ordered, I am glad ,observation: baked beans running on plate under Hamburger Bun. Resident #58 informed this surveyor I wish they would have put those beans in a bowl. 12/15/25 1:30PM Staff interview with Food Service Director, questioned her if she or anyone has updated resident #58 meal preferences, she informed this surveyor No I have not Spoke with Food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Additionally, the facility failed to follow the proper sanitation practices for the kitchen and the food preparation equipment. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 92. Findings include: a) 12/16/25 8:30 AM during an observation of food delivery carts five (5) of five (5) each had food debris on the bottom shelves, outside of the cart along bottom of doors, and along outside of each cart was a dried substance. 12/16/25 9:00 AM during a staff interview, district manager for food and nutrition, reviewed the five (5) of five (5) food delivery carts and confirmed there was food debris on the bottom shelves, outside of the cart along bottom of doors, and along outside of each cart dried substance. On 12/15/25 at 11:40 AM the surveyor completed an initial walkthrough of the kitchen. The Director of Dining (DOD) accompanied the surveyor during and acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records. This deficient practice affected three (3) of 28 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifiers: #2, #96 and #69. Facility census: 92. Findings included: a) Resident #2 Record review on 12/17/25 at 10:36 AM revealed the facility failed to ensure an accurate care plan for Resident #2. The wrong name was used in this resident's care plan. This finding was confirmed with the administrator on 12/17/25 at 10:30 AM. b) Resident #69 Review of Resident #69's physician's orders showed an order written on 10/23/25 for No BP (blood pressures) or needle sticks in left or right arm due to dialysis access. Utilize thigh cuff for BP. This order was written because the resident had an arteriovenous (AV) dialysis fistula in his left arm and a Permacath dialysis catheter in his right chest area. On 12/17/2025 at 11:38 AM, Resident #69 stated staff used his leg and not his arms to obtain blood pressure readings. He stated his left arm was used for blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation and staff interviews, the facility failed to have required quarterly meetings. Additionally, the facility did not have required attendees present or sign in at the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. Facility Census: 93.Findings included: a) QAA Record review of the facility's documentation of QAA Meeting Agenda and Minutes revealed no meeting was conducted in the first quarter or the third quarter of 2025.During an Interview 12/22/25, at 11:30 AM the Administrator verified the required members did not sign in for the quarterly QAA meetings and there was no documentation of QAA meetings in the first and third quarter. No other information was provided prior to the end of the survey.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to follow accepted standards of practice related to enhanced barrier precautions. Facility staff also failed to perform hand hygiene between residents while giving the residents ice and failed to maintain the ice cart in a clean and sanitary manner. These were random opportunities for discovery that had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #5, #69, and #3. Facility Census: 92. Findings included: a) Policy ReviewThe facility's procedure titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions with effective date 08/01/23 and revision date 05/01/25 stated Enhanced Barrier Precautions apply to residents with chronic wounds and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g., central line, urinary catheter, enteral feeding tube, tracheostomy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure two (2) residents received a dignified dining experience. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #95 and #3. Facility census: 92. Findings include: a) Resident #95 On 12/17/25 at 11:40 AM the lunch meal observation revealed Resident #52 was served a meal at table with Resident #95. Staff did not serve Resident #95 until 11:50 AM. Staff were observed serving other tables prior to serving Resident #95. During the the interview with Staff #23 the staff said, His tray must still be in the kitchen. b) Resident #3 The facility's procedure titled Feeding a Patient/Resident with effective date 08/31/20 and revision date 03/01/24 gave instructions to sit in a chair at eye level with the resident when feeding a resident. On 12/15/25 at 12:47 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #65 was observed feeding Resident #3 in his room. Resident #3 was in his bed and RN #65 was standing beside him while she used a spoon to put food into the resident's mouth. There was a chair at the bedside. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) form to one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the facility's beneficiary protection notification practice during an annual survey. This failure placed the resident at risk of not being informed of her rights prior to the end of Medicare Part A covered services. Resident identifier: #72. Facility census: 92.a) Resident #72 Resident #72 reamined in the facility after 07/10/25 whcih was the last day of Medicare Skilled Coverage. The NOMNC was issued on 07/08/25 but there was no evidence that the SNF ABN was ever issued. During an interview on 12/18/25 at 11:25 AM, Bookkeeper #72 stated, I don't think so. I can check After searching in the electronic medical record, checking in the business office files, and then checking in the Administrator's office, she returned with the Business Office Manager. The Business Office reported that a SNF ABN had NOT been issued.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one (1) of ten (10) resident rooms observed during the long-term care survey process. room [ROOM NUMBER]. Facility Census: 92.Findings included: a) room [ROOM NUMBER]During the initial tour of the facility, on 12/15/25 at 2:30 PM, the following issue was identified:-The wall beside Resident #52's bathroom was in poor repair. There were unfinished joint compound layers on top of the drywall without paint covering it, approximately 12 inches in width and spanning approximately 2 1/2 feet up the wall.-The ceiling right above Resident #52's bed had unfinished joint compound layers on top of the drywall without paint covering it, approximately 15 inches long.-The rest of the room has multiple small areas of wall and paint damage that measure 1 - 2 inches in size.-The Air conditioner / heater filter was soiled with about three eights inch (3/8) thick of dust and debris.The Administrator at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for residents with a newly evident or a possible serious mental health disorder. This was true for two (2) out of three (3) sampled residents reviewed under the PASARR pathway during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #1 and #6. Facility census: 92Findings included:a) Resident #1A record review, completed on 12/17/25 at 11:09 AM, revealed:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].On 06/27/25, the resident was given a Bipolar diagnosis.The only PASARR on file was dated 05/02/25. This PASARR did not reflect the resident's Bipolar diagnosis During an interview on 12/17/25 at 11:29 AM, the Director of Social Services (DOSS) reported a new PASARR had not been completed to capture Resident #1's diagnosis of Bipolar. b) Resident #6 On 12/16/2025 10:27 AM the record review for Resident #6, noted WV Pre-admission Screening and Resident review (PASARR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise residents' care plans when treatment changed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect two (2) of 28 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifiers: #69 and #52. Facility census: 92. Findings included:Findings included: a) Resident #52. During a record review on 12/16/25 at 2:00 PM, the following physician order for one-on-one was found, Provide one-on-one supervision, 24 hours per day.The order began on 09/19/25 and was discontinued on 9/26.25. Care Plan printed on 12/16/25 showed one-to-one supervision, 24 hours a day.During an interview with Director Nursing (DON) on 12/16/25 at 3:44 PM, the DON acknowledged that the one-on-one Supervision ended in September 2025 and the care plan was not updated to reflect that. a) Resident #69 Review of Resident #69's physicians' orders showed an order written on 10/23/25 for No BP [blood pressure] or needle sticks in left or right arm due to dialysis access. Utilize thigh cuff for BP. On 12/15/2025 at 1:09 PM, Resident #69 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY PS & Findings [NAME] The facility failed to ensure residents received the appropriate treatment and assistive devices to maintain a resident's vision abilities for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for communication/sensory issues. Resident identifier: #59. Facility census: #92 Findings included: a) Resident #59 The facility failed to ensure resident #59 received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities. During an interview on 12/15/2025 at 12:32 PM Resident #59 reported that she had been in the facility for approximately two (2) months. When she arrived here, staff put some of her belongings in storage. She reported her $300 glasses have not been given back to her and she has reported this to the social worker. She said she would like for them to either be found or replaced. She said currently did not have any glasses to use. On 12/16/2025 1:41 PM a review of the grievance log showed no grievances listed in regards to missing glasses for resident. On 12/16/2025 2:45 PM during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assess and treat pressure ulcers within accepted standards of care. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of pressure ulcers. Resident Identifier: #98. Facility census: 92. Findings included: a) Resident #98The facility's policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management with effective date 07/01/01 and revision date 09/15/25 stated wound evaluations would be performed for new in-house acquired wounds. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was receiving hospice services. On 10/31/25, a nurse practitioner note stated, in part, Resident does have a stage II pressure ulcer to sacrum. No sign of infection noted .Pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 2. Continue to cleanse with wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply Sure Prep to periwound and under adhesive contact areas. Cover with Optifoam Gentle every 3 days and as needed. Will monitor and manage as appropriate.The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services within accepted standards of practice for falls. The facility failed to document falls. The facility also failed to assess fall risk and failed to conduct appropriate post fall analyses to prevent further falls. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of falls. Resident Identifier: #96. Facility Census: 92. Findings included:a) Resident #96 The facility's policy titled Falls Management with effective date 09/15/01 and revision date 10/01/25 gave the following instructions: - All residents would be assessed for risk of falls upon admission, with reassessments routinely (e.g., quarterly, post fall). - An assessment would be completed after falls to determine possible injury. - Resident-centered interventions would be implemented and documented. - The circumstances of the fall, post-assessment, and resident outcome would be documented in the risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure quality and continuity of care was arranged for an provided for a resident receiving hospice services. Resident identieir: #38. Facility census: 92. a) Resident #38A record review on 12/16/25 of Resident #38's chart revealed that Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a fair prognosis under skilled nursing care and then immediately ordered hospice care under (name of hospice) for the diagnosis of Terminal DX for Comfort. The facility has no record of the Hospice admission agreement or any other documentation signed by either Resident #38, their medical power of attorney (MPOA) and/or the facilities medical / social service staff, in either electronic format or in the hard copy binders for each resident.The only signed document on file was a long term care status form denoting routine hospice care. Also, the facility did not have any record of the Amedisys Hospice treatment plan for Resident #38; the expected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and family interview the facility failed to inform the Medical power of Attorney (MPOA) of appointments for Resident #46. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (3) three residents reviewed. Resident identifiers # 46, Facility Census 91.Findings included:Resident # 46 Medical Power of Attorney(MPOA):During a phone interview on 10/29/25 at 11:40 AM,(statement written as reported) The MPOA, for Resident #46 stated, The first time the van driver took him (Resident #46), to a Dr. appointment, wearing a wander guard bracelet and left him without checking to see if I was there was in October of 2024. I found out he had an appointment when I received a phone call from the Dr's office letting me know he was there and stated they were surprised I wasn't with him. They know me there and know that I am always with him. She also stated it happened on January 9, 2025 and January 28 2025. She stated she then complained to the Director Of Nursing (DON) on January 29, 2025 and didn't hear back from her until 02/02/25. The DON told her the Van…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident representative interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to process and investigate a reported grievance. This was true for (1) of (3 ) residents sampledResident Identifier: #46 Facility Census: 91 Findings Included:a) Per The Facility Grievance Policy, the grievance officer will oversee grievances through conclusion leading any necessary investigations by the facility, issuing written decisions to the patient, and coordinating with state and federal agencies.b) In an interview with resident # 46's MPOA on 10/28/25 at 2:20pm, she stated the facility had transported Resident # 46 to an appointment more than once without notifying her in advance of the appointments. She stated the first time was in October of 2024. On 01/09/2025 and on 01/29/25. the van driver dropped him off without making sure she was there for him. She stated she called and complained directly to facility Director of Nursing. c) Record reviews:-On 10/28/25 at 03:45 PM, During record review the grievance form, there were not any grievances/complaints from Resident #46's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure professional care and standards of practice were followed in regards to meal time supervision for resident #4. This was true for one (1) of (3) residents reviewed. Resident Identifiers: # 4, # 61, and # 27 . Facility Census: 91Findings Included:a) Observation:-During an observation of meal pass on 10/29/25 at 12:44PM, Resident # 4 was served his meal by employee identifier # 60. She assisted in setting up his tray and drink and left the resident's room.b) Record Review:-Based on a review of resident #4's meal ticket and his care plan, It was ordered to have supervision at mealtimes.-A review of Facility, Meal Service Policy Practice Standards, 3.2.2, Assure the correct meal is served and 3.2.5 If the patient requires assistance, sit next to patient while assisting to eat or do not deliver tray until assistance can be provided.c) Staff Interviews:-During an interview with the Facility Corporate Coordinator, on 10/29/25 at 1:25PM, He acknowledged the care plan and the meal ticket stated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to include residents/resident representatives to participate in care plan meetings. The facility failed to hold regularly scheduled care plan meetings and to invite residents or their representatives to those meetings. This was true for five (5) of five (5) residents reviewed for care plan meetings. Resident identifiers: #295 #81, #15, #8, #40. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Resident #295 At approximately 1:30 PM on 02/05/24, an interview was conducted with Resident #295. During the interview, Resident #295 was asked if the facility held care plan meetings with them or their representatives. Resident #295 stated I'm my own representative and I do not recall ever being a part of these meetings. A record review was conducted for Resident #295 regarding care plan meetings. Record review indicated there were two (2) care plan meetings held regarding Resident #295. These meetings took place on 06/09/21 and 01/12/24. Care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. A table top in the Transitional Care Unit (TCU) dining area had approximately one third of the laminate covering missing with exposed jagged edges. Resident #43's room floor needed to be cleaned. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This failed practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents that currently reside in the facility. Resident identifier: #43 Facility Census: 94 Findings included: a) Table top in the TCU dining area; During a tour of the building on 02/06/24 at 08:24 AM a dining table in the TCU dining area was observed to be uncovered. Upon examining the top surface of the table, approximately one third of the table top laminate that covers the inner resin of the table had been torn off. The remaining laminate covering the table top had sharp jagged edges and the inner resin of table was exposed. During an interview with Social Services #80 at 8:19 AM on 02/06/24 and the Director of Nursing (DON) at 8:25 AM on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, by failing to keep treatment and medication carts locked when they were out of use and out of sight of nursing staff, and by failing to remove razors with no safety caps from Resident #196's room. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Treatment Cart At approximately 9:43 PM on 02/06/24, an observation found the TCU Treatment Cart having a door open. Upon further inspection, the treatment cart was also unlocked and all doors could be opened. Drawers were full of wound treatment supplies. At approximately 9:45 PM on 02/06/24, an interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #4. ADON #4 stated I just went down and changed dressings a minute ago and I didn't lock the cart back. b) Resident #196 During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, record review, and resident council, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were always available to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promoted resident rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Facility Assessment Review of the Facility Assessment, revealed Section A.1. Sufficiency Analysis Summary states, We have daily discussions about unit staffing. Administrator, Scheduler, and Director of Nursing (DON) meet each morning to review current staffing patterns along with any additional needs. If it is determined that there are additional needs due to acuity, additional staff will be added or staffing adjustment will be made. b) Interview with Scheduling and Payroll Manager During an Interview, on 02/07/24 at 9:37 AM, the Scheduling and Payroll Manager stated staffing patterns were determined during the daily discussions held between her, the DON, and the Administrator. She explained it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a performance review for three (3) out of three (3) Nurse Aides (NA) reviewed in the sufficient and competent nurse staffing pathway during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Employee identifiers: NA #5, #29, and #58. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Review of Nurse Aide Personnel Files A review of Nurse Aide (NA) employee personnel files was completed on 02/07/24 at 2:30 PM. There was no evidence that NA #5, NA #29, and NA #58 had a yearly performance review on file. The Manager of Scheduling and Payroll reported a change in Administrators in November 2023. She stated, The QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) committee identified a need for a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) and they had me do a complete audit on all personnel files. I identified the absence of annual evaluations, but no action was taken. The decision was eventually made to start with a clean slate in January 2024. I cannot produce annual evaluations for the three (3) Nurse Aides in question. .
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to keep the daily posted nurse staffing information up-to-date and current. This was true for four (4) out of 12 sampled days during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Daily Posted Nurse Staffing During a review of the facility's Daily Posted Nurse Staffing and the Daily Time Detail Report reflecting clock-in and clock-out punches for all direct nursing care staff, the following discrepancies were identified: -On Sunday, 07/02/23, the Daily Posted Nurse Staff Form listed a total number of staff hours as 327.00. The Daily Time Detail Report reflecting the actual clock-in and clock-out punches listed a total number of staff hours as 295.52, reflecting a discrepancy of 31.48 hours not worked as planned. -On Saturday, 08/13/23, the Daily Posted Nurse Staff Form listed a total number of staff hours as 279.50. The Daily Time Detail Report reflecting the actual clock-in and clock-out punches listed a total number of staff hours as 247.77, reflecting a discrepancy of 31.73 hours not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated upon opening in accordance with the accepted professional standards of practice. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #9. Facility Census: 94. Findings Included: a) Undated Medications On 02/06/24 at 2:05 PM, a tour of the medication cart on the Transitional Care Unit (TCU) was completed. The tour found the following over-the-counter (OTC) medications and Resident #9's insulin were not dated upon opening: --one (1) bottle of Acetaminophen 325mg (milligrams) --one (1) bottle of Ferrous Sulfate 325mg --one (1) bottle of Magnesium Oxide 400mg --two (2) bottles of Multivitamins --one (1) bottle of Aspirin 81mg --one (1) bottle of Vitamin D 25mcg --one (1) bottle of Vitamin C 500mg --one (1) bottle of Multivitamins with zinc --one (1) bottle of Calcium 500mg --one (1) bottle of Benadryl 25mg --one (1) bottle of Singular 10mg --Resident #9's Lantus insulin On 02/06/24 at 2:08 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #4 confirmed the medication was not dated upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
According to observation, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to serve food at safe and palatable temperatures by serving cold food at higher temperatures than directed. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Food Temperatures At approximately 11:25 AM on 02/05/24, Dietary Manager (DM) #123 was observed taking temperatures of the food prior to service. DM #123 took the temperature of cottage cheese on the serving line, the cottage cheese had a temperature of 42.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F). A policy on food handling was requested. Upon policy review, it was determined that foods that are to be served cold should be served at 41 degrees F or below. DM #123 was made aware and acknowledged the temperature of the cottage cheese was higher than the policy stated. b) Unit tray temperatures At approximately 12:16 PM on 02/06/24, food temperatures were taken by DM #123 on a tray delivered to the floor. The tray contained french fries…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain safe and working equipment by failing to repair the ice machine in the facility's kitchen. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 94. Findings included: At approximately 11:20 AM on 02/05/24, an observation was made of the ice machine during a tour of the kitchen. The ice machine was leaking from underneath, causing puddles to form in the floor of the kitchen. When asked about the leak, Dietary Manager (DM) #123 stated It's been leaking for a while. I put a work order in on TELS (building maintenance program), it just hasn't been fixed yet. At approximately 2:49 PM on 02/05/24, a copy of the work order for the repair of the ice machine was requested from DM #123. DM #123 produced the work order for the ice machine, dated 01/15/24 at 12:47 PM. At approximately 10:59 AM on 02/06/24, an interview was conducted with Senior Maintenance Director (SMD) #130 regarding the ice machine. SMD #130 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Resident #43. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #43. Facility Census: 94. Findings included: a) Resident #43 On 02/06/24 at 8:18 AM, an observation was made of Resident #43 being fed. However, Nurse Aide (NA) #59 was standing while assisting the resident with breakfast. On 02/06/24 at 8:25 AM, the Director of Nursing was notified and confirmed the NA should not be standing while feeding the resident.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of the facility grievance/complaint forms, Resident Council meeting minutes, Resident Council meeting and staff interview, the facility failed to consider resident group views and act upon grievances and recommendations. The facility also failed to provide these groups with responses, action, and rationale taken regarding their concerns pertaining to issues of resident care and life in the facility. This was a random opportunity for discovery. These practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents which reside in the facility. Resident identifier: #16, #44, #66 and #77. Facility Census: 94 Findings included: A review of the Center Operations Policies and Procedures policy title OPS204 with a revision date of 01/08/24 revealed the following: The Policy outline includes but is not limited to; The Administrator will serve as the Grievance Officer who is responsible for overseeing the grievance process, including the Civil Rights grievances/concerns, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusions, leading any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidentiality of medical records for Resident #43 and #295. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #43 and #295. Facility Census: 94. Findings Included: a) Resident #43 On 02/06/24 at 9:03 AM, while observing medication administration, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #31 left the computer screen unattended with Resident #43's information visible. LPN #31 stated, I thought I locked it. On 02/06/24 at 9:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the computer screen should have been locked prior to leaving the area. b) Resident #295 On 02/06/24 at 9:30 PM, a tour of the 100 hall was completed. During the tour, the medication cart was sitting by room [ROOM NUMBER] in which Resident #295 resides. An observation of the computer screen unattended was made with Resident #295's information visible. LPN# 44 was inside of room [ROOM NUMBER] assisting the residents. LPN #44 confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of the facility grievance/complaint policy, Resident Council meeting and staff interview, the facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the resident. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents which reside in the facility. Resident identifier: #16, #44, #66 and #77. Facility Census: 94. Findings included: A review of the Center Operations Policies and Procedures policy title OPS204 with a revision date of 01/08/24 revealed the following: The Process outline includes but is not limited to; 1. A description of the procedure for voicing grievances/ concerns will be on each unit in a prominent location and must include: 1.1 The right to file a grievance orally (meaning spoken) or in writing, the right to file grievances anonymously; 1.2 The contact information of the grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed, that is, their name, business address (mailing and email) and business phone number; 1.3 A reasonable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the State Ombudsman of acute care transfers for Resident #6 and Resident #53. This is true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident identifiers: #6 and #53. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Resident #6 On 02/07/24 at 11:12 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #6. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 06/12/23 for a temperature and headache and on 10/23/23 for chest pain. Upon completion of the review, the medical records department was asked to provide the confirmation of the State Ombudsman being notified of the transfers to the acute care facility. Medical Records Manager #10 provided the monthly fax receipts for June and October of 2023. However, the review found Resident #6's name was not listed on either monthly fax receipt. On 02/07/24 at 2:00 PM, Medical Records Manager #10 stated, I do not know why these transfers were not included in the monthly faxes. b) Resident #53 On 02/07/23 at 12:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident representative regarding the facility bed hold notice of policy and authorization. This is true for three (3) of four (4) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident Identifiers: #6 , #53 and #10. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Resident #6 On 02/07/24 at 11:12 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #6. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 06/12/23 for a temperature and headache and on 10/23/23 for chest pain. Upon completion of the review, the medical records department was asked to provide the signed bed hold notice of policy and authorizations to the acute care facility. Medical Records Manager #10 provided the bed hold policies for both transfers. However, the bed hold policies dated for 06/12/23 and 10/23/23, did not have the signature of the resident or resident representative or date. The Center representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to coordinate with the appropriate, State-designated authority, to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs by failing to update the Pre-admission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #40 following a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder. This is true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for PASARRs during the survey process. Resident Identifier: 40. Facility Census: 94. Findings included: At approximately 3:00 PM on 02/05/24 a record review was conducted for Resident #40. During record review, it was determined that Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with no diagnosis of a Level II mental illness. Resident #40 was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder on 01/24/19 and the facility did not update the PASARR for the resident, to reflect that diagnosis. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the immediate needs of residents. This was true for two (2) of 23 residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #196 and #347. Facility census: 94 Findings included: a) Resident #196 A record review, completed on 02/06/24 at 11:00 AM, revealed Resident #196 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The baseline care plan identified Resident #196 was at risk for decreased ability to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, toileting. The following interventions were not complete and failed to indicate the correct level of staff assistance needed: -Provide resident/patient with ______(specify: set-up, supervision, limited, extensive, total) assist of _____(specify #) for bed mobility. -Provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered care plan regarding Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for Resident #35. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of mood and behavior. Resident Identifier: #35. Facility Census: 94. Findings Included: a) Resident #35 On 02/05/24 at 11:30 AM, the facility matrix was reviewed. Resident #35 was identified with a diagnosis of PTSD. A record review was completed. A Social Services assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was a victim of a violent assault. However, the care plan was not developed regarding the diagnosis of PTSD. On 02/07/24 at 10:00 AM, Social Services (SS) #80 was notified regarding the care plan not including the diagnosis of PTSD. On 02/07/24 at 12:00 PM, SS #80 stated, I updated the care plan to include PTSD. No further information was obtained during the survey process.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise care plans to accurately reflect the conditions of residents. The facility failed to revise a care plan for depression for Resident #15, a COVID diagnosis for Resident #78, and tube feeding for Resident #53. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for care plan revision during the survey. Resident identifiers: #15, #53, #78. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Resident #15 At approximately 10:00 AM on 02/06/24, a record review of Resident #15 was conducted. During record review, it was noted that Resident #15 was care planned for a focus of distressed/fluctuating mood symptoms related to: Sadness/depression caused by history of mood disorders, long term care placement. Two interventions for this focus were observed to be Observe for pain and effectiveness of current interventions. Attempt non-pharmacological interventions (initiated on 11/08/21, created on 11/08/21, revised on 11/08/21) and Administer pain medication as ordered and document effectiveness/side effects (initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care that is necessary to maintain good oral hygiene care. This was true for one (1) of 23 residents. Resident identifier: #44. Facility Census: 94. Findings included: a) Resident #44 During an interview on 02/05/24 at 1:25 PM Resident #44 stated that she has a hard time with getting her oral care done because she was dependent on the staff and they did not always help her. She was not able to physically get the items she needed to perform oral care but can perform it once they have given her the needed items. During a medical record review, on 02/06/24 at 8:56 PM, of the [NAME] task for Resident #44 Task: Mouth care-cleaning of teeth/dentures/mouth Look Back: 30 (days). This report identified seven (7) days that no oral care was provided by staff and/or self completed by the resident. These dates were marked not applicable. -01/15/24, 01/19/24, 01/20/24, 01/21/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order regarding an enteral feeding for Resident #53. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of tube feeding. Resident identifier: #53. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Resident #53 On 02/07/24 at 2:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #53. The review found a physician's order dated 12/28/23 stating, as needed give 237ml (milliliter) per G-tube (gastrostomy tube) if <(less than) 50% (percentage) of meal is consumed. Osmolite 1.5. (one point five). (Typed as written.) The resident's weights were reviewed. The resident's weight has remained stable. Upon reviewing the Medication Administration Record for December 2023, the following dates should have had an as needed feeding administered based on the documentation: --12/29/23 lunch (25%) Upon reviewing the Medication Administration Record for January, 2024, the following dates should have had an as needed feeding administered based on the documentation: --01/01/24 breakfast (resident not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor Resident #15 for side effects of psychotherapeutic medications. This was true for one (1) of (1) residents reviewed for monitoring of side effects during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #15. Facility census: 94. Findings included: a) Resident #15 On 02/06/24 at approximately 9:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #15. The review found the resident was taking an antidepressant (Sertraline) for depression. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated November, 2023 through January 2024 were reviewed and found a physician's order for Sertraline 50mg (milligram) daily for depression dated 09/24/23. The physician's order included a question regarding behavior, Yes or No. However, the physician's order did not include any specific behaviors to monitor. At approximately 12:30 PM on 02/07/24, the Director of Nursing (DON) #56 was notified and confirmed there was no documentation of specific behaviors listed to be monitored.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner by failing to ensure the food was free of contamination and hazards. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 94. a) Test Trays At approximately 11:55 AM on 02/06/24, two (2) test trays containing the facilities lunch menu were delivered by Dietary Manager (DM) #123. The menu for lunch was: Hamburger on roll, lettuce and tomato garnish, grapes, french fries, or cottage cheese fruit platter and a cinnamon muffin. Upon observation of the trays, a pit of a pear was found on the cottage cheese fruit platter. Upon observation of the tray containing the hamburger, a dead insect was found on the lettuce. At approximately 12:08 PM on 02/06/24, DM #123 and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) were notified and acknowledged the pear pit as a potential choking hazard and the dead insect on the lettuce.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a medical record that was complete and accurately documented. The facility failed to obtain a physician signature on a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form for Resident #48 prior to uploading it to the electronic medical record and the facility incorrectly entered a Code Order Status related to the timeframe the Resident #48 desired to have medically assisted nutrition. Additionally, the facility failed to complete a smoking assessment it its entirety for Resident #74. This deficient practice was true for two (2) of 23 resident records reviewed during the annual long-term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #48 and #74. Facility census: 94. Findings Included: a) Resident #48 During a record review, completed on 02/05/24 at 4:49 PM, the following issues were identified: -The scanned Physician Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, signed by resident on 01/15/24, indicated Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), Selective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control standards during medication administration for Resident #15, Resident #47, Resident #43 and Resident #42. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #15, #47, #43, and #42. Facility Census: 94. Findings Included: a) Resident #15 On 02/06/24 at 8:22 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #31 was observed during medication administration for Resident #15. During the preparation of the medication the following pill was touched by LPN #31's bare hands: --Zoloft 50mg (milligrams) b) Resident #47 On 02/06/24 at 8:35 AM, LPN #31 was observed during medication administration for Resident #47. During the preparation of the medication the following pills were touched by LPN #31's bare hands: --Ativan 0.5mg --Multivitamin --Zoloft 50mg c) Resident #43 On 02/06/24 at 8:51 AM, LPN #31 was observed during medication administration for Resident #43. During the preparation of the medication the following pill was touched by LPN #31's bare hands: --Lasix 20mg d) Resident #42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to offer vaccinations to Resident #4 and #6. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of immunizations. Resident Identifiers: #4 and #6. Facility Census: 94. Findings Included: a) Resident #4 On 02/07/24 at 1:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #4. The review found the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV) 20 was not offered to the resident. On 02/07/24 at 3:00 PM, the Infection Preventionist (IP) # 37 was notified and stated, I made a mistake .I should have offered it to her. b) Resident #6 On 02/07/24 at 2:15 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #6. The review found the PCV 20 vaccine was not offered to the resident. On 02/07/24 at 3:10 PM, the IP #37 was notified and stated, she went out to the hospital .I should've followed up with her son sooner. No further information was obtained during the survey process.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-19 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the activity director was certified as an activity professional by a recognized accrediting body. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 92. Findings included: a) During an interview on 12/19/23 at 12:30 PM, with the facilities Activity Director, the surveyor asked her how long she had been certified and how long she had worked at the facility. She stated, I have worked here 7 years and have been an Activity Director for 5 years. I am not certified. I have been through 6 administrators and have told them I need to do this. I have not had the state approved course yet. During an interview, on 12/19/23 at 1:00 PM, with the Administrator she stated, I was not aware that she was not certified, I have only been here a month. I will definitely check into it. A review of the employees hiring records on 12/19/23 at 1:30 PM, revealed the Activity Director was hired at the facility as a Nursing Assistant on 09/16/16 and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. One (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds did not receive wound treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility did not assess or provide treatment to the wounds according to professional standards of care Additionally, the physician-ordered medication parameters were not followed for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for medications. Resident identifier: #93. Facility census: 92. Findings included: a1) Resident #93 - non-pressure wounds The facility's policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management with effective date 07/01/01 and revision date 02/01/23 gave the following procedures: - Complete comprehensive evaluation of the patient upon admission - Evaluate any reported or suspected skin changes or wounds - Complete wound evaluation weekly Review of Resident #93's medical records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide catheter care in accordance with professional standards of care. This failed practice had the potential to affect two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of catheter care. Resident identifiers: #28, #93. Facility census: 92. Findings included: a) Resident #28 Review of Resident #28's medical records revealed the resident had an order for an indwelling urinary catheter due to urinary retention. Review of the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed an order written on 10/08/23 to perform indwelling catheter care every day and evening shift. The order was discontinued on 11/17/23. The order to perform indwelling catheter care every day and evening shift was reordered on 12/13/23. There was no evidence the resident had been out of the facility or had the catheter removed from 11/17/23 and 12/13/23. During an interview on 12/18/23 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated an order had been written on 11/17/23 to discontinue Resident #28's indwelling urinary catheter but the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had reasonable accommodation of needs by failing to ensure the resident had a bed that was long enough for his body length. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #88. Facility census: 92. Findings included: a) Resident # 88 During an Observation on 12/19/23 at 8:55 AM, Resident #88 was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. His calves were on the foot board and his feet were hanging over the edge of the footboard. During an interview on 12/19/23 at 8:57 AM, Resident #88 stated, I am not comfortable in this bed The surveyor asked the resident if he felt he needed a longer bed and he stated, Well don't you think? A record review on 12/19/23 at 9:15 AM, revealed Resident #88 was admitted on [DATE] with a height of 79 inches (6 feet 7 inches tall.) During an interview, on 12/19/ 23 at 9:20 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #62 she stated, Yes, he needs a longer bed, he is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report an alleged violation related to abuse, to all the required State authorities. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #19. Facility census: 92. Findings included: a) Resident #19 Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, showed: Physical Abuse Includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, etc., as well as controlling behavior through corporal punishment. A complaint investigation on 12/18/23, discovered a reportable for a Resident-to-Resident altercation with alleged abuse on 11/13/23. The incident included Resident #94 wandering into Resident #19's room, when asked to leave the room Resident #94 punched Resident #19 in the head 4 -5 times. --Section Notes, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) notified Ombudsman of Resident to Resident with alleged abuse. Resident #19's Minimum Data Set (MDS,) Significant Change Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/19/23 noted the resident had a score of Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. A BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer care in accordance with professional standards of care. This failed practice had the potential to affect two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of pressure ulcers. The failure to assess and follow the physician's orders for Resident #87's pressure ulcer caused harm to the resident. The resident developed a pressure ulcer infection, requiring intravenous antibiotics while in the faciity, and also was transferred to the hospital for suspected pressure ulcer infection and deteriorating wound. Resident identifiers: #93, #87. Facility census: 92. Findings included: a) Policy review The facility's policy titled Skin Integrity and Wound Management with effective date 07/01/01 and revision date 02/01/23 gave the following procedures: - Complete comprehensive evaluation of the patient upon admission - Evaluate any reported or suspected skin changes or wounds - Complete wound evaluation weekly b) Resident #93 Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record pertaining to a Covid-19 diagnosis. This practice affected one (1) of three (3), residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Resident identifier #2. Facility census: #93. Findings included: a) Resident #2 A medical record review on 09/27/23, revealed Resident #2's Covid-19 diagnosis on 08/28/23. Continued review found the facility line listing noted Resident #2's Covid-19 diagnosis on 08/31/23. Resident #2 was put in Isolation precautions on this date. During an interview, on 09/27/22 at 12:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator verified the medical diagnosis in Resident #2's medical record was inaccurate. It was confirmed Resident #2 was not diagnosed with Covid -19 until 08/31/23.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff donned appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering transmission-based precaution (TBP) room. These failed practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: #13. Facility census: 95. Findings included: a) Resident #13 An observation on 08/29/23 at 8:22 AM found Maintenance #25 entering Resident #13's room without PPE. The signage on Resident #13's door showed the room was on Contact Plus Airborne Precautions. The TBP sign stated, Perform Hand Hygiene BEFORE and AFTER patient contact, contact with environment & after removal of PPE. Wear an N95 Respirator, Gown, Face Shield and Gloves upon entering this room. Maintenance Director #25 was observed in Resident #13's room without a gown, face shield, or gloves. During an interview on 08/29/23 at 8:30 AM, Maintenance Director #25 stated he did not know Resident #13 was in isolation. He continued to say he did not see the sign on the door. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and family interview, the facility failed to notify the responsible party of changes in a resident's condition for one (1) of three (3 closed records reviewed. Resident identifier: #99. Facility Census: 95. Findings included: a) Resident #99 A review of Resident #99's care plan revealed a plan initiated on 07/12/22, which indicated this resident was receiving Antiplatelet therapy and Aspirin and was at risk for bleeding. The goal for this care plan stated the resident will not exhibit bleeding by the next review and interventions include observing for bleeding, hematuria, bruising, nose bleeds, gums, and blood in stool. This care plan had been continued each quarter. According to the Nursing Notes dated 05/22/23, a skin check was performed on Resident #99 and there were no skin issues. On 05/26/23, it was identified Resident #99 was up to the wheelchair then transferred to the recliner chair via the Hoyer lift. The dressing to the left arm was saturated with dark brown drainage to the skin tear. The dressing was changed for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident notified of progress toward resolution. This is true for One (1) of two (2) residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Resident identifiers: #29. Facility census: 95. Findings included: a) Resident #29 On 08/29/23, at 8:52 AM during an interview Resident #28 stated, he has complained about other residents coming in his room and taking his personal belongings. He stated he had talked to Social Services, but nothing was ever done about the missing items or the intruding residents. On 08/29/23 a review of the facility records regarding missing items and grievances revealed Resident #29 had no concerns or grievances filled out. A continued record review of Resident #29's medical record found a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/31/23, A review of this MDS found the resident's brief interview for mental status was fifteen (15) the highest score obtainable and indicated Resident #29 was cognitively intact. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for one (1) of 20 residents in the long-term care survey sample. Resident identifier: #91. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) #91 Review of Resident #91's medical records showed the resident had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the medical records showed the resident had been receiving hospice services since admission to the facility. Resident #91's MDS assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 05/23/22 did not document the resident was receiving hospice services. During an interview on 06/08/22 at 11:37 AM, the Administrator verified Resident #91 was admitted to the facility with hospice services. The Administrator also verified the resident's MDS assessment with ARD 05/23/22 did not document the resident was receiving hospice services. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised and accurate in the Food and Nutrition area for Resident #53. This was true for 1 (one) of 20 (twenty) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier #53. Facility Census 93. Findings included: a) Resident #53 On 6/06/22 at 3:01 PM it was observed that Resident #53 has a wander guard on his right ankle for elopement precautions. Record review on 6/07/22 at 9:53 AM shows the following elopement evaluations were found to be completed: 6/5/2022, 1/24/2022, 9/04/2021, 7/06/2021, 3/15/2021. There was change of condition documentation for elopement and elopement attempts or exit seeking on the following dates 9-04-21, 1-24-22, 5-14-22, and 6-05-22. According to his care plan the resident has a history of cutting his wander guard off and is to have plastic silverware and no sharp objects in the room. He has a diagnosis of dementia. There is no active order for plastic silverware. Upon observation of the Residents lunch on 6/07/22 at 12:31 PM he does not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. The medication cart was left unlocked when unattended. This was a random opportunity for discovery that had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Medication Administration Facility Task On 06/07/22 at 08:04 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #44 entered Resident #69's room to administer medications. The medication cart was in the doorway of the resident's room, facing the room. LPN #44 did not lock the medication cart when leaving the cart and entering the room. At 8:05 AM, LPN #44 closed the door to the resident's room for privacy to apply a lidocaine patch to the resident's back. The medication cart remained unlocked in the hallway at this time. At 8:06 AM, LPN #44 opened the resident's door and returned to the medication cart. LPN #44 acknowledged the medication cart was unlocked when she was in the resident's room with the door closed. No further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to evaluate residents experiencing impaired nutrition. Two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition were not weighed as ordered by the physician. Resident identifiers: #89 and #68. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #89 Review of Resident #89's medical records showed a physician's order written on 04/13/22 for weekly weights. The weights were to be obtained every Wednesday. Prior to the order, the resident had a weight obtained on 04/08/22, and the resident weighed 100.4 pounds. Following the order, the medical records showed the following information for Resident #89's weekly weights on Wednesdays: - 04/13/22: the resident was not weighed - 04/20/22: the resident was not weighed - 04/27/22: the resident was not weighed - 05/04/22: the resident weighed 97.2 pounds - 05/11/22: the resident weighed 102.7 pounds - 05/18/22: the resident was not weighed - 05/25/22: the resident weighed 101.6 pounds The resident was admitted to the hospital 05/30/22-06/04/22. She was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to deliver respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed in the area of respiratory care during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #62 and #86. Facility census: 93 Findings included: a) Resident #62 On 6-06-22 at 12:16 PM observation found Resident #62 had oxygen on via nasal canula. The oxygen tubing was not dated with a change out date. This was confirmed with Registered Nurse (RN) #21. The Policy and Procedure states the oxygen tubing and storage containers for all respiratory supplies are to be changed weekly and dated on the change out date. b) Resident #86 On 06/06/22 at 11:02 AM observation found Resident #86 had oxygen on via nasal canula. The oxygen tubing for the nasal canula was not dated with a change out date. This was confirmed with RN #21 on 06/06/22 at 11:04 AM. The Policy and Procedure states the oxygen tubing and storage containers for all respiratory supplies are to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-08 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure performance reviews for Nurse Aides were conducted at least once every 12 months. This was true for one (1) of three (3) Nurse Aides reviewed for the sufficient and competent nurse staffing facility task. This deficient practice had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Sufficient and competent nurse staffing facility task On 06/07/22 at approximately 2:00 PM, the Administrator was asked for copies of the yearly performance reviews for three (3) Nurse Aides, including Nurse Aide (NA) #24. On 06/07/22 at 4:09 PM, the Administrator stated a yearly performance review had not been conducted for NA #24. No further information was provided through the completion of the survey. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days, or that the rationale for extending beyond 14 days was documented along with the duration of the PRN order. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for the care area of fall. Resident identifier: #26. Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #26 Review of Resident #26's medical records showed an order for written for alprazolam (Xanax) 0.25 mg every night as needed for insomnia. No duration for the order was provided. Additionally, the medical records did not contain a physician's rationale for why the order should be extended beyond 14 days. Review of Resident #26's Medication Administration Record showed the resident last received the PRN alprazolam on 05/28/22. During an interview on 06/07/22 at 2:21 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #26's PRN alprazolam order had been extended for over 14 days without a documented rationale or a duration for the order.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was found that two (2) containers of grape juice stored in the refrigerator had expired. Additional findings included cabinets uses to store pots, pans and baking ware were rusted and could not be sanitized. The wall behind a prep table had peeling yellow paint and rust around the back edge of the table which could not be cleaned and sanitized. These practices had the potential to affect a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 106. Findings included: a) Expired juice On 06/06/22 at 11:07 AM an observation with the Dietary Manager (DM) found two (2) containers of grape juice that had expired on 06/04-05/22 in the refrigerator in the kitchen. The DM immediately removed the containers of grape juice and confirmed they were expired. b) Cabinets During this same observation with the DM, two (2) cabinets used to store pots, pans and baking ware were rusted. The DM confirmed the cabinets were rusted and could not be cleaned and sanitized. This contaminated the pots, pans and baking ware. c) Wall During the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to have a complete and accurate order regarding an indwelling urinary catheter. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of catheters. The order for a catheter for Resident #63 did not specify the size of catheter or the balloon inflation. Resident identifier: #63 Facility census: 93. Findings included: a) Resident #63 A medical record review on 06/07/22, revealed Resident #63's catheter order was incomplete. The order did not specify the size of catheter to be used or the amount of cubic centimeters (cc) needed to inflate the balloon. During an interview on 06/07/22 at 4:20 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), verified the order for Resident #63's catheter was incomplete. .
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/31/2011 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| INGRAM, PATRICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/15/2024 |
| TOOTHMAN, JAMES | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $939K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515085. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.