Ravenswood Village
200 Ritchie Avenue, Ravenswood, WV 26164 · For profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (304) 273-9385 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.5% | 14.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.7% | 7.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 15.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.7% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.5% | 22.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.8% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.6% | 79.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.6% | 22.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.7% | 11.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.09 | 1.84 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.0%CMS range 24.5–51.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 8.2–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.7–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 60.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.91 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.49 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) when residents were diagnosed with a new diagnosis after being admitted to the facility. This was true for three (3) of six (6) PASARRs' reviewed during the Long Term Care Process Survey. Resident Identifiers: #28, #1 and #42. Facility Census: 58. Findings Included: a) Resident #28 On 03/24/25 at 1:48 PM record review shows Resident #28 has a current medical diagnosis of dementia, anxiety, major depressive mood disorder and psychotic disorder with hallucinations. The Psychotic disorder with hallucinations was a new diagnoses after Resident #28 was admitted to the facility. There is an active order for Aripiprazole for targeted behavior(s) as evidenced by (AEB): auditory hallucinations and hears voices. According to the PASARR dated 09/24/24 which was provided by the facility, there is no indication of psychotic disorder with hallucinations on the PASARR. On 03/26/25 at 10:18 AM during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) contained all admitting diagnoses. This was true for three (3) of six (6) PASARRs' reviewed during the Long Term Care Process Survey. Resident Identifiers: #28, #14 and #1. Facility Census: 58. Findings Included: a) Resident #28 On 03/24/25 at 1:48 PM record review shows Resident #28 has a current medical diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, major depressive mood disorder and psychotic disorder with hallucinations. According to a list of medical diagnoses present on admission/readmission Resident #28 has a diagnosis of anxiety. According to the PASARR dated 09/24/24 which was provided by the facility, there is no indication of a diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder on the PASARR. On 03/26/25 at 10:18 AM during an interview with the Social Services Director #34, it was confirmed that the anxiety diagnosis should be on the PASARR. b) Resident #14 On 03/26/25 at 9:10 AM a record review shows Resident #14 has a current medical diagnosis of anxiety, bipolar,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards by not having the janitor's closet locked, and completing smoking evaluations for Resident #17. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a minimal number of residents residing in the Long Term Care Facility. Resident Identifier: #17 Facility Census: 58. Findings included: a) Facility janitor closet unlocked On 03/25/25 at 10:20 AM this surveyor observed the janitor's closet door unlocked, this is located at the beginning of Hall 200 across from the nurses station. The following chemicals were on the MSDS Sheet and were stored in the janitor's closet. The sheet listed the following: virex 2-256 disinfectant Stride industrial floor cleaner GP forward industrial cleaner Glance Window cleaner triad 3 Disinfectant cleaner rapid disinfectant Disinfectant cleaner Bio Matic Cleaner [NAME] Dual Action FLoor cleaner Good sense Air Freshener…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic, antidepressant, antianxiety medications ordered by the physician had an appropriate diagnosis. This was found to be true in three (3) of five (5) records reviewed during the recertification survey. Resident identifiers: #42, #35, #45. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident #42 Physician orders were as follows: Trazadone HCl for insomnia as evidenced by (AEB): Depression Sleeplessness, not Socializing. Active 8/23/2024; Risperidone AEB: Depression, Grabbing, Yelling, Restlessness 12/13/2024 ; and Buspirone for anxiety AEB pacing and nervousness nerves 11/13/2024 . Related diagnoses pacing and nervousness nerves. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #26 on 03/25/25 at 2:53 PM, when asked about informed consents for these medication, she stated we dropped the ball and did not get this done. I have completed one just now and sent it out for physician's signature. b) Resident #35 Physician orders: Sertraline AEB: Unhappiness, Loss of Appetite, Poor Grooming,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the in-room refrigerator temperature logs and to monitor food for proper labeling of the date the food was placed in the refrigerator as stated in the Policy and Procedure #OPS192 Refrigerators: Patient In-Room. This was true for three (3) of four (4) in room refrigerators observed. Resident identifiers: #28, #17 and #1. Facility Census: #58. Findings Included: a) Resident #28 On 03/24/25 at 1:27 PM observation of the Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Log form, which was located on the front of Resident #28's in-room refrigerator, found nine (9) out of twenty three (23) days had not had a temperature check. In addition, there was food items in the refrigerator that were opened and not dated. On 03/24/25 at 1:30 PM it was confirmed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #44 there was a sandwich, two containers of unknown food and various other items in the refrigerator that were not dated. According to Policy OPS192 Refrigerators: Patient In-Room POLICY: Foods may be stored in refrigerators within patient rooms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) regarding a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This was found to be true for one (1) of 20 residents sampled in the recertification survey. Resident identifier: #42. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident #42 During an interview with Resident #42 on 03/24/25 at 2:10 PM, when asked about the care and treatment for PTSD, the resident responded, I do not have that. A review of resident's medical record, provided the following: Resident #42 was admitted with the following diagnoses: Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, mild 12/9/2024, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, chronic 12/9/2024, Delusional Disorders,12/9/2024, Anxiety Disorder, unspecified 4/22/2024 Resident #42's PASARR was completed on 04/08/24, and did not state any diagnoses of depression, PTSD, or anxiety. The PASARR had not been updated at the time of the survey. Physician orders included the following: Trazodone for insomnia as evidenced by (AEB) depression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to dependent residents by not providing scheduled showers. This failed practice was found true for two (2) of seven (7) residents reviewed for ADL care during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #210 and #39. Facility census 58. Findings Included: a) Resident #210 During the initial interview on 03/24/25 at 1:07 PM, Resident #210 stated, I have been here for a little over (2) two weeks and I have only had one (1) shower. A review of the shower schedule on 03/25/25 at 9:30 AM, revealed that Resident #210 was scheduled to receive showers on Mondays and Thursdays on the evening shift. A record review on 03/25/25 at 9:46 AM, of the shower task for Resident #210 revealed that the resident should have been given (3) three showers since admission and had only been given (1) one. Further record review of Resident #210's care plan, revealed a care plan for ADL care that reads as follows:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure it had a complete and accurate medical record related to diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD). This failed practice was found true for two (2) of six (6) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and mood/behavior during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #210, and #42. Facility Census 58. Findings Included: a) Resident #210 A record review on 03/25/25 at 10:54 AM, of Resident #210's current diagnosis revealed a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD) on admission. Further record review revealed a PTSD care plan that read as follows: Focus: Resident exhibits or is at risk for distressed/fluctuating mood symptoms related to: Depression, PTSD, Personality Disorder. Goal: Resident will express anxieties/fears to staff through next review. Interventions: Observe for pain and effectiveness of current interventions. Attempt nonpharmacologic interventions. - Administer pain medication as ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and family interview, facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there is sufficient qualified staff available at all times to meet the needs of the residents. This practice has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident #113 and family/Power of Attorney (POA) interviews On 03/13/23 at 2:17 PM, R#113 and his POA/significant other reported short staffing on the night shift. R#113 stated he was unable to get assistance with hygiene care after an incontinence event and had to call his POA at home for assistance at 3:00 AM on either the 9th or 10th of this month. The POA acknowledged she came into the facility after the call to clean and change R#113's brief. b) Staff interviews On 03/14/23 at 3:17 PM, Nursing Assistant (NA) #58 reported the facility's urinary toileting program is to check and change the resident every two hours. NA #58 stated It takes a minimum of ten minutes to change a resident with urinary incontinence. Longer if they are assisted to the restroom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide food at a safe and appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #49, #16, #40, #4, #32 and #36. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) 200 Hall Lunch Time Meal Observation During an observation on 03/13/23 at 12:23 PM, it was noted that a food truck was brought out of the kitchen with all resident lunch trays for residents on the 200 hall who preferred to eat in their rooms. Staff members began to deliver the trays to resident rooms at 1:52 PM, 29 minutes later. On 03/13/23 at 1:00 PM, the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) tested the temperature of Resident #49's lunch tray, the last tray to be served on the 200 Hall, with the following results: -Puree Chicken: 99.0 degrees Fahrenheit (F) -Puree Hash [NAME] Casserole: 116.9 degrees F -Puree Broccoli Florets: 106.7 degrees F -Fortified Pudding: 50.7 degrees F -Puree Homemade Dutch Apple Pie: 57.8 degrees F The CDM agreed the food temperatures obtained were not considered to be the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance/concern and to keep the resident's representative notified of progress toward resolution. This was true for one (1) of three (3) grievances reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 60. Findings Included: a) Policy Review of the facility's Grievance/Concern policy, with a review date of 06/01/22, directs the facility will: -Contact the person filing the grievance/concern to acknowledge receipt -Investigate the grievance/concern -Take corrective actions, if needed -Notify the person filing the grievance of resolution within 72 hours b) Resident #4 During an interview on 03/13/23 at 11:11 AM, Resident #4 stated she was not able to hear very well without her hearing aid. Resident #4's family member was at resident's bedside and reported the hearing aid was lost approximately a week or so ago but had not been found. Mom barely hears anything without it. Review of the Grievance/Concern log, on 03/14/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect and a serious bodily injury were reported in a timely manner to the appropriate state agencies. The failure to make a timely report was true for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents with neglect concerns reviewed under reportables during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #27 and #19. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Policy Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition policy, with a review date of 10/24/22, states immediately upon receiving information concerning a report of suspected or alleged neglect the facility will report allegations to the appropriate state and local authorities within 24 hours. Additionally, the policy states the facility will report within two (2) hours any event which results in serious bodily injury. b) Resident # 27 A review of reportables from October 2022 - March 2023, completed on 03/14/23 at 11:30 AM, revealed the facility had three (3) reportables related to allegations of neglect. An allegation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident Minimum data sets were completed and accurately reflected the residents status. Resident #35 had three (3) MDS assessments which were in accurate under section (N) medications. Also for Resident #35 the nutritional Care Area Assessment (CAA) for nutritional status was not fully complete. For Resident #54 the facility failed to complete an accurate MDS in regards to the residents hospice status. This was true for two (2) of 19 sampled residents reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: #35 and #54. Facility Census: 60. Findings Included: A) Resident #35 1) Medications A review of Resident #35's medical record at 7:30 am on 03/15/23 found three (3) MDS with the following assessment reference dates 10/03/22, 01/03/23, and 03/03/23. Review of all three (3) assessments found the following answers to Section N0450. Antipsychotic Medication Review: . B. Has a gradual dose reduction (GDR) been attempted?…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #19's care plan was implemented in the area of falls. This was true for one (1) of 19 sampled residents. Resident Identifiers: #19. Facility Census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #19 A review of Resident #19's medical record at 8:00 am on 03/15/23 found the following care plan focus statement: (First name of Resident #19) is at risk for falls and actual falls related to cognitive loss, lack of safety awareness, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet The goal associated with this focus statement read as follows: (First name of Resident #19) will have no falls with no major injury through next review. The care plan contained the following intervention: Yellow tape to call light along with yellow laminated sign Please use call bell and wait for help placed in room to assist with visual cuing and promote safety awareness Observation of Resident #19's room with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/15/23 at 11:30 am found there was no a yellow laminated sign reading, please use call bell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #31's neurological assessments were completed when there was bruise discovered to her right outer eye. In addition Resident #38 had a recommendation from a medical specialist which was not addressed with the attending physician and was not completed prior to surveyor intervention. This was true for two (2) for 19 sampled residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifiers: #31 and #38. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #31 An observation at Resident #31 on 03/13/23 at 2:53 PM found the resident had a bruise to the outside of her right eye. A review of her medical record found a change in condition dated 03/12/23 at 6:30 PM. The change in condition form indicated that neurological checks would be initiated. Further review of the record found no indication the neurological assessments were completed. An interview with Director of Nursing (DON) at 12:21 PM on 03/14/23, confirmed the neurological assessments were not completed. b) Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident/family interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assist a resident/resident representative in locating resources, as well as in making appointments, and arranging for transportation to replace a lost hearing aid. This was true for one (1) out of three (3) residents reviewed for grievances. Resident identifier #4. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #4 During an interview on 03/13/23 at 11:11 AM, Resident #4 stated she was not able to hear very well without her hearing aid. Resident #4's family member was at resident's bedside and reported the hearing aid was lost approximately a week or so ago but had not been found. Mom barely hears anything without it. Review of the Grievance/Concern log, on 03/14/23 at 1:37 PM, revealed the following details: -A Grievance/Concern was completed on 03/07/23 at 12:38 PM, stating, resident's left hearing aid is missing. -Staff who were aware of the Grievance/Concern were listed as Social Worker #12, the Director of Nursing, and the Administrator. During an interview on 03/14/23 at 2:33 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #19's fall interventions were implemented; therefore, her environment was not as free from accident hazards as possible. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of accidents during the long term care survey. Resident Identifiers: #19. Facility Census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #19 A review of Resident #19's medical record at 8:00 am on 03/15/23 found the following care plan focus statement: (First name of Resident #19) is at risk for falls and actual falls related to cognitive loss, lack of safety awareness, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet The goal associated with this focus statement read as follows: (First name of Resident #19) will have no falls with no major injury through next review. The care plan contained the following intervention: Yellow tape to call light along with yellow laminated sign Please use call bell and wait for help placed in room to assist with visual cuing and promote safety awareness Observation of Resident #19's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #35 maintained acceptable parameters of nutrition. Resident #35 had abnormal lab values. In response to the lab values the physician ordered a low potassium diet. This order was never implemented by facility staff. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #35. Facility Census: 60. Findings Included: a) Resident #35 A review of Resident #35's medical record found a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) dated 06/07/22 which indicated the residents potassium level was high at 4.7. A further review of the record found a nurses note dated 06/08/22 written at 12:04 PM which read as follows: Physician Notified (list name,date,time of notification): (Name of attending physician) 6/8/2022 Labs Reviewed (list labs): CMP Physician Response/Other Action Taken/Resident Representative notified if applicable: low potassium diet. Further review of the record found no indication the low potassium diet recommended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents and visitors wishing to view the information. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Staff posting Review of the facility's staff posting on 03/14/23 at 7:40 AM, found the previous day's nurse staffing on display. Receptionist #3 confirmed the nurse staff posting for 03/14/23 was not posted upon Surveyor entrance to the building. During an interview, on 03/14/23 at 9:40 PM, the Administrator acknowledged the facility's failure to have the current nurse staffing posted at the beginning of the morning shift. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for one (1) of 19 sampled residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey process. The facility failed to update a resident Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form to reflect the name and contact number of the Hospice agency providing services to resident. Resident identifier: #54. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #54 A brief record review, completed on 03/13/23 at 1:49 PM, identified the following details: -Resident #54 had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form on file. The facility had obtained consent from Resident #54's Health Care Surrogate (HCS) on 12/05/22. Social Worker #12 assisted with the completion of the form. -Resident #54 began to receive hospice services on 12/11/22. -A care plan conference was held on 12/15/22. The POST form was not updated at that time to reflect Resident #54 was receiving Hospice services or the name and contact number of the Hospice agency. The 2021 POST Form Guidance instructs, this form should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. A nurse failed to use a barrier during medication pass and staff failed to change their gloves and sanitize their hands after incontinence care. This was a random opportunity for discovery and has the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: 16 and 55. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Medication administration During an observation of medication administration on 03/14/23 at 8:16 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #17 placed three eye drop containers in the original boxes on Resident (R) #55's bedside table without a barrier. R#55 picked up one bottle at a time, removed the bottle from the box and placed the cap on the bedside table while administering each eye drop. R#55 replaced the cap and put each bottle back into it's box after each administration. LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the walls in the residents' rooms. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Rooms identifiers: 301, 302, and 307. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) On 03/13/23, observations on the first day of the survey revealed the following concerns in residents' rooms. --301 multiple areas where paint was off the wall and dry wall was exposed. Trim broken, cracked and hanging off the edge of the wallboard at the head of the bed. --302 several holes in the drywall, trim ripped above resident's bed and hanging outward --307 paint missing off the wall and trim cracked and hanging out over the first resident's head of bed On 03/15/23 at 8:36 AM, a tour with the Maintenance Director confirmed the drywall was exposed where the paint was missing in all three rooms, the holes in the walls and the trim above the headboards needed repaired. .
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a random opportunity for discovery, through observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records. Electronic medical records were left open and visible to those passing by in the hallway of the facility. This random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: Residents #17, #6 and #33. Census: 56. Findings included: a.) Policy Review A review of Policy OPS209 Privacy Rights: Patient, with a revision date of 11/28/16, notes the patient has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his/her personal and medical records. b.) Resident #17 An observation , on 01/25/22 at 08:32 AM, revealed the medication cart on A Hall with the Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) visible as one walked down the hallway. No nurse was present at the medication cart. Information visible pertained to Resident #17 and included the following: name, allergies, code status, vital sign results and special instructions for medication administration. An interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide resident-centered care and services, in accordance with preferences, goals for care and professional standards of practice to meet each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was true for five (5) of eighteen (18) residents reviewed during the Long-term Survey Process Survey (LTCS). For Resident #32, the facility failed to complete an accurate readmission assessment when resident was readmitted , this was true for areas of vital signs including weights and failure to assess and identify pressure ulcers, For Resident #22, the facility failed to follow physician orders for antiseizure medications and Resident #6 the orders for supervision while eating and the special utensils. and for Resident #51 medications were not given as ordered and for Resident #30's orders for feeding tube flushes were not followed. Resident identifiers: #32, #22, #6, #51, and #30. Facility census: 56. Findings include: a)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff Interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from accident hazards over which it had control. The A-Hall medication cart was left unlocked and unattended on two (2) occasions, allowing access to medications by residents and unauthorized persons. These were random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 56. Findings included: a) Unlocked Medication Cart on the A-Hall on 01/24/22 at 11:45 AM. Observation on 01/24/22 at 11:45 AM, found the medication (med) cart on the A-Hall was left unlocked and unattended. Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #29 confirmed the med cart was unlocked and unattended, allowing access to medications by residents and unauthorized personnel. CNA #29 then stated she would find a nurse to address the concern. On 01/24/22 at 11:51 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) joined Surveyor on the A-Hall by the med cart. The ADON also confirmed the nurse assigned to the A-Hall med cart had left it unlocked and unattended. He confirmed it was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that the consulting pharmacist's identified irregularities were reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it. This was true for three (3) out of six (6) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifiers: #51, #34, and #19. Facility census: 56. Findings Included: a) Resident #51 A medical record review, completed on 01/25/22 at 1:45 PM, revealed the consulting pharmacist had completed a medication regimen review (MRR) on 03/05/21. The MRR outlined the following recommendation: -Recommendation: No indication requiring Protonix twice daily, please change to once daily. There was no evidence the attending physician had reviewed the pharmacist's consultation report. There was no physician response documented. There was no physician signature. On 01/26/22 at 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed the irregularity and it was not documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections including COVID - 19. This was based on improper hand hygiene, wound care and catheter care. A Resident not being placed in transmission based precautions (TBP) per Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and visitation being denied. Facility Census 56. Resident Identifies # 30, #53, #32, #46 Findings Included: a) Medication pass On 01/25/22 at 9:24 AM, During medication pass this surveyor observed RN #51 use ABHR (Alcohol- based hand rub) over gloved hands to sanitize used gloves. RN # 51 then attempted to continue with medication pass but was stopped by this surveyor before touching medications. RN # 51 was guided to use centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) guidelines for hand hygiene. RN# 51 then took off the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-26 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain the Resident #53's dignity by not pulling the curtain during a dressing change. This was a random opportunity for discovery . Resident Identifier # 53 Facility Census: 56. Findings Included: a) Resident #53 A review of the the Facility Policy titled: Wound Dressings: Aseptic No Touch with an effective date of 06/01/96 with a review date: 12/01/21, and a revision date: 12/01/21 found the following: . 7 explain the procedure and provide privacy. On 01/26/22 at 10:35 AM , the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was observed providing wound care to Resident #53's wound on his buttocks. The ADON proceeded to address Resident #53 and explained the procedure. The ADON at this time undressed Resident #53 leaving the curtain open and Resident #53 vulnerable to the view of anyone entering the room. As the ADON removed Resident #53's brief he stated Resident must have lost old dressing in brief, as there was not a dressing covering the wound. On 01/26/22 at 11:26 AM, The DON acknowledged that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of 18 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form completed per directions specified by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life Care in conjunction with the [NAME] Virginia Health Care Decisions Act (16-30-1). Resident identifiers: #19, #50, and #51. Facility Census: 56. Findings included: a) Resident #19 A medical record review, completed on 01/24/22 at 2:00 PM, found there was a signed POST form on file. The POST form was signed and dated by Resident #19 on 09/16/20. Section E of Resident #19's POST form did not list the telephone number of Resident #19's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA). The guidance for completing the POST form, compiled by the [NAME] Virginia Center for End-of-Life, states the name, address, and phone number of the person legally authorized to make healthcare decisions [should the resident be incapacitated] are to be listed on the lines marked Name/Address/Phone. A Physician Determination of Capacity,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents had Minimum Data Sets (MDS) which were not completed and/or inaccurately coded. The MDS for Resident #22, failed to reflect his cognitive patterns (section C), mood (section D), behaviors (Section E) and medication (Section N) these sections were incomplete and/or inaccurate. Resident identifier: #22. Facility census: 56. Findings include: a) Resident #22 Review of resident #22's medical records, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. diagnosis included anoxic brain damage, quadriplegic, communication deficient, cerebral infarction due to overdose of illegal substance, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, hepatic failure, and seizures. He was unable to communicate on admission. A significant change MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/09/21 was completed. At that time the resident was coded as speech clear, and resident understands, and he is understood, this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for the care area of nutrition. Resident #30's fluid output was not monitored as directed in the care plan. This was true for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed for care plan implementation. Resident Identifier # 30. Facility Census: 56 Findings Included: a) Resident # 30 A review of Resident #30's care plan with an initiated date of 01/03/22 reveals the following: A care plan focus that reads: Resident requires indwelling foley catheter 16fr (french) with 10 ml (milliliters) balloon The care plan interventions included: Monitor output for odor, color, consistency, and amount. On 01/25/22 at 2:25 PM, the DON acknowledged the care plan intervention stated the facility would document the amount of urine produced by Resident #30. The DON stated they do not have an order for strict I&O so they are not recording urine outputs. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise the Resident #30's care plan in a timely manner regarding his wishes for end of life care. This was true for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed for care plan implementation. Resident Identifier # 30. Facility Census: 56. Findings Included: a) Resident # 30 A review of the [NAME] Virginia Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form dated [DATE] on file in Resident #30's medical record found the following: Section A is selected No CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation): Do Not Attempt Resuscitation. Further review of the medical record revealed a physician order dated [DATE] at 12:38 PM, which read do not resuscitate (DNR). A Physician Determination of Capacity dated [DATE] states Resident #30 lacks sufficient mental or physical capacity to appreciate the nature and implication of health care decisions. Expected duration of incapacity is long term. This form is signed by MPOA and Facility Physician. A review of the medical records revealed a care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to change humidifier bottles every seven (7) days. The failed practice was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Resident identifiers #34 and #19. Facility census: 56. Findings included: a) Resident #34 Review of the facility policy entitled Respiratory Equipment / Supply Cleaning / Disinfecting, with a revision date of 06/01/21, revealed oxygen humidifiers were to be changed every seven (7) days. An observation, on 01/24/22 at 11:57 AM, revealed Resident #34 was receiving oxygen through a nasal cannula at the rate of two (2) liters per minute. Resident #34 reported, I think the water bottle has been completely empty for a while now. Surveyor observed no water in the humidifier bottle which was dated 01/13/22. During an interview, on 01/24/22 at 12:02 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no water in the humidifier bottle and it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. This was true for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Resident Identifier: #51. Facility census: 56. Findings included: a) Resident #51 A medical record review, completed on 01/25/21 at 1:45 PM, revealed the consulting pharmacist had completed a medication regimen review (MRR) on 03/05/21. The MRR outlined the following recommendation: -Recommendation: No indication requiring Protonix twice daily, please change to once daily. There was no evidence the attending physician had reviewed the pharmacist's consultation report. There was no physician response documented. There was no physician signature. On 01/26/22 at 11:00 AM, the DON confirmed the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed the irregularity and it was not documented what, if any, action had been taken to address it. The DON then stated she would need to follow-up with the physician to determine how to proceed. .
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from significant medication errors. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Census: 56. Resident identifier: Resident #6. Findings included: a) Resident #6 An observation made during the medication administration pass, on 01/25/22, at 08:40 AM, revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #50 pulled Toprol XL Tablet Extended Release 24-hour 50 MG for Resident #6. RN #50 proceeded to crush the Toprol XL Extended-Release tablet with other medications and placed them in pudding in preparation to administer to Resident #6. At this time, the surveyor questioned the crushing of an extended-release medication and Nurse #50 stated she was aware Toprol XL was an extended-release medication but stated the medications had to be crushed for Resident #6 before administering. RN #50 verified there was no specific order allowing for the extended release medication to be crushed. After surveyor stopped Nurse #50 from administering the crushed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner to prevent the spread of Food Borne illness. This failed practice had the potential to affect an isolated number of residents currently residing in the facility. The facility had outdated items stored in the facility's nutritional pantry. In addition the Refrigerator Temperature Log in the nutritional pantry was incomplete. Facility Census: 56. Findings Included: a) Initial Tour of the nutritional pantry During an initial tour of the nutritional pantry beginning at 11:43 am on 01/24/22 with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) the following issues were identified: -- One Gallon of Sweet Tea with the name of Resident #15 on it. The manufactured stamped expiration date was 11/12/21 and the tea was opened and a portion of the tea was gone. The tea was in a cabinet and not refrigerated. The container of tea also indicated the tea was to be Refrigerated. -- A Salad with the last name of Resident #48 written on it. The salad was not dated as to when it was made and placed in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS OPERATIONS V LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/02/2015 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| AMOS, TANATHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/03/2025 |
| MALIK, ARIF | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/03/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $574K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515177. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.