No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hampshire Center

260 Sunrise Boulevard, Romney, WV 26757 · For profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (304) 822-7527 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (304) 822-7527 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
329 Sunrise Blvd · (304) 822-4932 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
30 Heritage Cir · (304) 822-8806 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.2 mi
22240 Northwestern Pike · (304) 822-3641 · Call to confirm hours
Park
20895 Northwestern Pike · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.6%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.4%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.5%7.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.2%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.2%15.9%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.1%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.7%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.7%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.3%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%79.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%22.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.861.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.951.841.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.1%CMS range 39.2–59.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.1–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge21.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 3.9–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.63
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
31.5%
Total nursing turnover
12.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 60.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-10)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice by crushing extended-release medications. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (3) residents reviewed for weight loss during the complaint survey process. Resident identifier #45. Facility Census: 59. Findings Include:a) Resident #45A record review, completed on 05/05/26 at 10:30 AM, revealed a physician order for Resident #45, dated 09/24/19, that read as follows: Generic substitution is authorized unless otherwise indicated. Center may participate in therapeutic interchange program, where permitted by state regulations. May crush crushable meds.Further record review found that Resident #45 was ordered:-Tolterodine Tart Extended Release 4 milligram (MG) tablet one time a day on 05/10/25 to present-Potassium CL extended release 10 milliequivalent (MEQ) tablet from 07/27/22 to 03/31/26-Potassium CL extended release 20 MEQ tablet from 04/01/26 to presentDuring an interview on 05/05/26 at 1:10PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with standards of practice. This was a random opportunity for discovery during a complaint survey process, with the ability to affect more than a limted amount of residents. Resident Identifier: Resident #45. Census 59.Findings Included: a) Resident #45 During the routine complaint investigation process, performed on 05/04/26, it was discovered that the physician orders, care plan, and Kardex for Resident #45 did not contain the same information. They (orders, care plan and Kardex) were updated as the status of the resident changed, however, they simply added the new information to what was already there and did not remove outdated information. The care areas that were not matching were the sections pertaining to transfers, eating and hygiene. Orders in chart:12/17/25 - Non weight bearing (NWB) post fall R ankle for one day12/26/25 - R ankle ORIF (Open Reduction and Internal Fixation) surgery12/30/25 - NWB Right lower extremity (RLE) at all times01/15/26 -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable homelike environment. This failed process was a random opportunity of discovery during Long Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 61. Findings include a) Resident #43 12/08/25 at 8:45AM observation of Resident #43 sitting in her wheelchair with a blanket wrapped around her, visibly shaking. Throughout interview with Resident #43, she informed this surveyor, I am so cold they just gave me a shower and it was so cold, I like to go early so its warm. 12/08/25 at 8:50A M interview with maintenance director and observing shower room temperature through maintenance director checking shower water temperature which read 94 degrees and room temperature reading 69.8 degrees. Maintenance director informed this surveyor, recovery for the water is usually 20 to 30 minutes, they need to wait in between showers. Maintenance director informed this surveyor, I have the parts ordered just waiting, I do have the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff record review, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all kitchen staff were up to date with their food handler cards. Two (2) of Eight (8) employees did not have food handler's cards. Interview with Dietary Manager, he confirmed these food handler cards were not obtained by expiration dates. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Employee identifiers: #20 and #7. Facility census: 61.Findings include a) food handler cards ,record review for all staff in dietary department b) [NAME] #20 date of hire-05/03/2025, did not obtain Food Handler Card until 12/01/2025 c) [NAME] #71 date of hire 08/09/2025, did not obtain Food Handler Card until 12/01/2025

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure menus were properly displayed with correct meal and that residents receiving meals were given the correct diet type. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Resident identifier: #49. Facility census: 67. Findings include: a) 12/07/25 at 11:40AM an observation of a menu board revealed an incorrect menu. Lunch on the board was listed as: Cheeseburger, cucumber salad, French fries, and peaches. Lunch served was maple sage turkey, stuffing, peas, dinner roll and pumpkin pie. During an interview [NAME] #17 confirmed meal was to be maple sage turkey, stuffing, peas, dinner roll, and pumpkin pie. 12/07/25 12:30PM Resident #49 received a menu for regular diet and needed one for consistent carbohydrate 12/07/25 2:30 PM during an interview with the Dietary Account Manager regarding the display menu next to the dining room entrance the Dietary Account Manager confirmed the correct menu was not on display. The Dietary Account Manager confirmed evening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a palatable, and attractive appearance for the residents that received their nutrition from the kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: 61. Findings include a) Resident #49 12/08/25 12:40 PM Resident #49 called this surveyor to room, upon entering she informed this surveyor the food is a little warmer today, however the potatoes are hard, and the vegetables are mush. Resident #49 handed this surveyor a potato. This potato was observed to be firm to touch. 12/08/25 12:50 PM a test tray was obtained from the kitchen The following was observed from tasting the items on the test tray:Salisbury steak- bland, seasoningScallop potato- bland seasoning, potatoes were firm to touch, with bite.Vegetable- California blend mushy- overcooked in appearance A review of the policy on 12/08/25 at 1:00PM, Titled [Food Temperatures], under purpose in part reads as follows :To serve food and drink that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observation and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure food was procured, stored, served in a sanitary way, this failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery during the Long Term Care survey process. Facility census: 61. Findings include: a) 2/07/2025 11:45AM observation upon entering the kitchen revealed a mop bucket, chemicals on floor next to bread rack, mops and brooms out leaning near the wall next to manager office- [NAME] #71,confirmed these items are out and need to be behind the janitor closet. Wet nesting to pans on shelf and x2 pans not inverted. [NAME] #71, confirmed the wet nesting and pans needed to be inverted. Spices were spilled on a shelf. [NAME] #71, confirmed. Hand sink trash can with brown liquid spilled on top of a lid. [NAME] #71 confirmed this needed cleaned. Food debris noted on bottom shelves of 2 of 3 tables. A sticky substance was also observed. [NAME] #71 confirmed this needed corrected. 12/07/2025 12:30 PM during dining room observation the following was observed:Cook # 71 was handling items with gloves during tray line then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain and provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Areas of concern were the dirty laundry room, Hallway 100, Hallway 300/400, and the Shared bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER]/109. Facility Census: 61. b) 300 and 400 hall soiled lift slings On 12/07/25 at approximately 11:40 AM upon entrance to the facility, it was observed that four slings were left draped over lifts and chairs in both the 300 and 400 hallways. The 300-hall had one (1) sling that was visibly dirty left hooked to the lift and thrown over the main lifting arm left in hall. The 400-hall had one (1) sling left out draped over the lift after being used, as well as lift slings that were dirty left in chairs down at the end of the 400 hallways. Slings once used are not to be left out in the hallway as this can increase risk of spreading contaminates around the facility. Clean slings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure care plans were updated to reflect current resident needs. This practice affected (1) of 20 care plans reviewed during Long Term Care Survey. Resident identifier #10. Census 61.Findings include a) Resident #10 A medical review for Resident #10 found a care plan and minimum data set (MDS) for bowel and bladder continence, reviewed and last updated on 06/06/20. The care plan was documented, Usually continent of bladder and bowel uses toilet. Recent MDS annual dated 06/24/24 revealed the resident was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. During an interview with the MDS coordinator, she verified this should be updated to reflect the change with bladder continence.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for the administration of insulin. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #3. Facility Census: 61.Findings Includea) Resident #3During record review on 12/10/25 it was noted that Resident #3 had been administered fifty-four (54) units of short-acting insulin, instead of the prescribed fifty-four (54) units of long-acting insulin on 01/20/25 at approximately 8:00 pm. The Change-in-Condition documentation noted that the Clinician was notified at 8:40 PM.The record review also revealed that the resident had been prescribed the following medications:A short-acting insulin -NovoLog Flex Pen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 100/Unit/ML. (Insulin Aspart). Inject subcutaneusly before meals for DM (diabetes mellitus).A long action insulin - Basaaglar Kwik Pen-Subcutaneous Solution Pen Injector 100 Unit/ML (Insulin Glanrgine). Inject 54 units subcutaneously two times a day for DM II.Further record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery of Resident #7's bed safety. Resident Identifier: #7. Facility census: 61. a) Resident #7 During an observation of Resident #7's bed, a 6-inch gap was found between footboard & mattress. Resident #7 was observed in bed with a blanket rolled up and put on one side of the footboard and a mattress gap for his feet to rest on. During an interview 12/09/25 at 1:35 PM the DON verified the footboard and mattress gap could cause entrapment. She stated that she would call the maintenance department to get it fixed immediately. No further information was provided prior to the end of the survey on 12/10/25 at 11:30 AM.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview the facility failed to ensure diet needs were being provided correctly (1) one of (7) seven reviewed for diets and nutrition. Resident identifier: #49. Facility census: 61. Findings include a) Resident #49 12/07/25 12:30PM, met with Resident #49 during interview, the resident complained of meals not usually being warm, cold at times, and not consistent, Resident #49 said, They do a lot of substitutions Resident #49 informed this surveyor, I received a three week menu but not for my diet, they gave me one for regular diet and I need a consistent carbohydrate Observation of the three week menu revealed it was for a regular diet with Resident #49 name. Observation of the lunch meal ticket for Resident #49 revealed it was for consistent carbohydrate diet, noting certain items: 1/3 cup cornbread dressing and 1/2 cup broccoli florets marked out with cauliflower written, also no stuffing and mashed written. Resident #49 reported Vegetables are always mushy, potatoes too hard, not cooked enough. Sometimes the meat is tough. 12/07/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide privacy to residents when providing assistance for showers. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the Survey process. Resident identifier #8. Facility Census 62. Findings Included: a) Resident #8 An observation on 08/12/24 at 9:45 AM, of the shower room located on hall 200 revealed the shower room had no lock or in use signage. Noticing there was no sign or lock the Surveyor knocked on the door. There was no answer, so the Surveyor entered the shower room. Further observation of the shower room revealed Nurse Aide (NA) #38 standing undressing Resident #8, who only had a brief on at this time. During an interview on 08/12/24 at 9:50 AM, NA #59, Stated, We just usually knock. I agree there isn't much privacy. During an interview on 08/12/24 at 10:00 AM, The Administrator stated, Well, us who work here know when shower time is. We just usually know when it is in use. The Administrator confirmed that there was no lock on the door, or in use signage.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding wound care for Resident #9 and #36, follow a physician's order regarding adaptive equipment for Resident #8, and completing an intervention per the physician for a possible resident to resident altercation for Resident #35. This was true for three (3) of 16 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #9, #36, #8 and #35. Facility Census: 62. Findings Included: a) Resident #9 On 08/13/24 at 10:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #9. The review found physician's orders were not being followed regarding treatments, including wound care. The following physician's orders were not completed on the following dates: --Clotrimazole-Betamethasone External Cream 1-0.05% apply to affected area topically every day shift for itching. --06/20/24 --07/02/24 --07/10/24 --Hydrocortisone External Cream 1% apply to affected areas topically every day and evening shift for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to serve meals at a palatable temperature. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents during the survey process. Resident identifiers #54 and #60. Facility Census 62. Findings Included: a) Food temperatures Resident #53 and #60 According to the meal timesheet hall 400 trays were brought out to the hallway at 7:45 AM During an observation on 08/13/24 at 8:00 AM, of hallway 400 it was revealed, Resident #54 and #60 were sitting in the hallway in reclining wheelchairs and their breakfast meal trays were still on the food cart. No staff were noted to be nearby and were down hall 200 passing breakfast trays. Further observation at 8:10AM of hallway 400 showed that Residents #54 and #60's breakfast trays were still on the food cart and no staff were present on the hallway. During an interview on 08/13/24 at 8:25 AM, while Residents #54 and #60's food was still on the meal cart, Nurse Aide (NA) #69 stated, We pass all trays on all halls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete record for an acute transfer for Resident #9 and meal intake for Resident #8. This was true for two (2) of 16 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #9 and #8. Facility Census: 62. Findings Include: a) Resident #9 On 08/12/24 at 12:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #9. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 02/22/24 . The transfer form listed the date as 07/08/23. On 08/12/24 at 12:30 PM, the Director of Nursing was notified of the incorrect transfer date. The DON stated, I will have to look into this. b) Resident #8 During a record review on 08/14/24 at 12:30 PM of Resident #8's meal intake from 06/16/24 to 08/12/24, it revealed that out of a possible 174 meals, 42 of those had no documentation. 0n 08/14/24 at 2:07PM the Nursing Home Administrator confirmed the meal intakes were not documented properly.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to do a complete and thorough investigation on a possible resident to resident altercation resulting in death. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers #63 and #35. Facility Census 62. Findings Included: a) Resident # 63 A record review on 08/13/24 at 9:00 AM, of Resident # 63's E Interact Change in Condition dated 01/20/24 read as follows: Another resident grabbed at this resident's sleeve and this resident lost balance and fell down. Resident landed on buttocks and the staff member caught head in hands before hitting the floor. Four staff members witnessed the fall. Further record review revealed another E Interact Change in Condition form dated 02/14/24 that read as follows: Found resident on floor in room [ROOM NUMBER], blood noted from back of head. Helmet, elbow pads, and hip pads on. 911 called, neck supported by nurse. Helmet removed. Further Record review revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement an intervention regarding pressure ulcers for Resident #54 and implement an intervention of wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) for Resident #50. This was true for two (2) of 16 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #54 and #50. Facility Census: 62. Findings Included: a) Resident #54 On 08/13/24 at 11:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #54. The review found the resident was receiving wound care for an unstagable pressure ulcer on the left heel. The care plan was reviewed regarding the wound care and pressure ulcer. The care plan listed an intervention of assist resident in turning and repositioning every 1 (one) hrs (hours) and PRN (as needed). The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed regarding this intervention on 08/13/24 at 1:00 PM. At this time, the DON was asked where is the documentation of the one (1) hour turning and repositioning? The DON stated, there is no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update a care plan regarding an actual fall for Resident #42. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #42. Facility Census: 62. Findings Included: a) Resident #42 On 08/14/24 at 9:20 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #42. The review found the resident had an actual fall on 07/10/24 due to the bathroom floor being slippery from powder which is being used with another resident who shares the bathroom. The care plan was reviewed at this time. The care plan focus area stated, Resident is at risk for falls, R/T (related to) Weakness, Osteoarthritis, Chronic Pain, HTN (hypertension). The need for assistance with ADLs, (activities of daily living) use of meds (medications) that could cause drowsiness/dizziness. On 08/14/24 at 9:48 AM, the Director of Nursing was notified the care plan had not been revised to show an actual fall had occurred on 07/10/24. The DON stated, the care plan has not been revised to show an actual fall.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to dependent residents. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (4) four residents reviewed for ADL care during the survey process. Resident identifier #50. Facility Census 62. Findings Included: a) Resident #50 During an Observation on 08/14/24 at 5:00 PM, Resident #50's call light came on. Further observation at 5:10 PM, shows Resident #50's call light continues to be on. During an interview on 08/14/24 at 5:15 PM, Resident #50 stated, I need changed, I feel wet. An observation on 08/14/24 at 5:16 PM, shows Nurse Aide (NA) #71 and NA #17 entering Resident #50's room. The NA's asked Resident #50 what he needed. Resident #50 stated, I want changed NA #17 stated, I'll be back in a few minutes with your tray. The call light was then turned off and NA #71 and #17 walked out of the room. At 5:18 PM, the surveyor intervened and asked NA #71 what Resident #50 needed? NA #71 stated, Oh, I didn't hear what he said, he usually wants coffee. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the needs and interest of the residents. This was a random opportunity for discovery during the survey process. Resident identifier #36. Facility Census 62. Findings Included: a) Resident #36 An observation on 08/12/24 at 12:20 PM, showed Resident #36 eating her lunch in a common area in front of the nurses station. Further observation showed Resident #36 continuing to sit in the common area in front of the nurse's station with no television and/or music on at 1:30 PM, 1:45 PM, 2:25 PM and 3:00 PM. An observation on 08/13/24 at 8:30AM showed Resident #36 eating her breakfast in a common area in front of the nurses station. Further observation of Resident #36 at 10:00AM revealed Resident #36 crying in the common area in front of the nurses station. No Television/music was on at this time. Resident #36 continues to be in the common area at 11:00 AM and still appears to be upset.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment to prevent further decrease in range-of-motion for Resident #11. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #11. Facility Census: 62. Findings Included: a) Resident #11 On 08/14/24 at 3:30 PM, an interview was held with Resident #11. During the interview, Resident #11 stated, I had my shower earlier and they didn't put my splint on my hand (right). On 08/14/24 at 4:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #11. The review found a physician's order stating, SoftPro resting hand splint (WHFO) (wrist/hand/finger orthosis) to be applied to right hand in the morning, when patient is in her wheelchair, and to be removed in the evening, at bedtime. Skin checks to be performed pre/post WHFO application two times a day. On 08/14/24 at 5:04 PM, an additional observation of Resident #11 was made. The resident did not have the resting splint on her right hand. On 08/14/24 at 5:07 PM, an interview was held with Nurse Aide (NA) #71. The NA was asked,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment, over which it has control, was as free from accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #9. Facility Census: 62. Findings Include: a) Resident #9 On 08/12/24 at 9:00 AM, the initial interview was held with Resident #9. Observations made during the interview, found multiple medications sitting on the over-the-bed table and laying on the resident's bed. Resident #9 was asked, are you allowed to have these medications in your room? The resident responded, it is okay .it is no big deal. On 08/12/24 at 9:28 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #41 entered into the resident's room. RN #41 was asked, why does the resident have medication laying around his room? RN #41 stated, I don't know why the medication is in here .I didn't know anything about it. On 08/12/24 at 9:40 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed regarding the medication found in Resident #9's room. The DON stated, We don't know what he has .his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's visits were completed every 30 days for the first 90 days for Resident #9. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #9. Facility Census: 62. Findings Included: a) Resident #9 On 08/12/24 at 9:00 AM, an interview was held with Resident #9. The resident stated, I want to talk to the physician about certain things and I can never see him .it's usually the nurse practitioner .sometimes it's things I want to discuss with a physician. On 08/12/24 at 11:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #9. The findings of the review were unclear as to when the facility physician visited the resident versus the nurse practitioner. The DON was asked for a list of the provider's visits to Resident #9. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The physician's visits were as follows: --02/22/23 --03/22/23 --05/25/23 --06/22/23 --09/10/23 --11/26/23 --01/21/24 The physician's visits…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review the facility failed to provide an effective infection control program which meets current standards of practice. This failed practice was found true for (3) of (3) residents reviewed for infection control practices during the survey process. Resident identifiers #9, #54, and #50. Facility Census 62. Findings included: a) Resident #9 During an observation on 08/12/24 at 9:45 AM, of Resident #9's bathroom revealed (2) two bed pans were in the bathtub, (1) one of the bed pains had small droppings of a brown substance in it and liquid was in the corners. The commode had Urine in it with a black ring around the top of the urine. Mixed vegetables were found on top of the stopper in the sink. During an interview on 08/12/24 at 9:50 AM, Resident #9 stated, They never clean that stuff up. They just come and do it as fast as they can. During an interview on 08/12/24 at 10:00 AM The Director of Nursing (DON) stated, Yes, this shouldn't be like this. I will get it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice.This had the potential to affect any residents receiving nourishment from the kitchen. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During the kitchen tour on 01/15/24 at 9:13 AM, it was discovered the second-hand washing sink did not have a trash can. The floor under the shelving unit housing the steam table pans was dirty, and the back corner of the walk-in cooler had debris on the floor. An interview with the Dietary Manager on 01/15/24 at 10:25 AM, verified the hand washing sink needed a trash can, the floor beneath the shelving unit needed to be cleaned and the back corner of the walk-in cooler needed to be cleaned.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility record review, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) review, and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. These failed practices were discovered during observation of medication administration, and review if the Infection Preventionist surveillance had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: #39, #43, #165, 38, #6, #113, #5, and #112. Facility census 59. Findings included: a) Medication administration a-1) Resident #39 On 01/17/24 at 8:04 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #59 was observed passing medication. The following medication was adminsitered to Resident #39: Abilify 10 mg Aspirin 81 mg Eliquis 5 mg Fluticasone nasal spray Lidocaine patch Methimazole 5mg Prednisolone eye drops LPN#59 failed to use a barrier when she placed the nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review and staff interview the facility failed to establish an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. This was true for six (6) out of nine (9) residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. Resident identifiers: Resident #9, #23. #4 #34, #113, and #11. Facility census 59. Findings included: a) Resident #9 A review of the line listing found Resident #9 had onset of symptoms of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) on 12/29/23. Resident #9 was given an antibiotic named Cipro which started on 01/02/24. There was no resolution date entered. Also, the were no results listed or if a Urinalysis (UA) was completed. Leaving it unclear if the antibiotic given was needed or the correct one for this infection. On 01/17/24 at 11:35 AM the Infection Preventionist (IP) was asked for the UA and the results. IP stated the resident was sent to the ER (a local hospital) and they are unable to get the results. b) Resident #23 A review of the line listing found Resident #23 had onset of symptoms of a Urinary Tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. These failed practices were a random opportunity for discovery and were true for Resident #9. Resident identifier: #9. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #9 During the interview process of the survey on 01/15/24 at 8:10 AM. Upon entering the room, it was noted the roommate in the bed beside the window was almost finished with his breakfast. His tray was empty except for a fourth of the egg toast sandwich he was eating. While Resident #9 was trying to blindly reach for food on the tray, because the tray was not placed in front of him and was above his eye level. Resident #9 found a prepackaged cup of juice. Resident #9 was observed trying to open it for eight (8) minutes. He tried to push his finger through the top, he tried to bite it open, and then he used a spoon and finally got a hole in the top of it by using the handle of the spoon. Resident #9 drank the juice from the small hole. On 01/15/24 at 8:48 AM, Resident # 9 had managed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints and evaluate resident's ability to remove physical restraints easily. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for restraints. Resident Identifier: #51 and #49. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #51 Observed Resident #51 up in a Broda wheelchair with a thigh strap restraint in place and buckled in the back of the chair, on 01/15/24 at 9:08 AM. A second observation on 01/16/24 at 8:36 AM found Resident #51 up in chair with thigh strap restraint in place. A review of Resident #51's medical record on 01/16/24 at 10:32 AM found no physician's order for a Broda wheelchair with thigh positioning device/restraint. Continued review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/20/23. Section P, Restraints and Alarms, indicated no physical restraints were used. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored a 1, which indicated severely impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident Interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was reported when Resident #55 was burned from an e-stim patch. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier #55. Facility Census 59. Findings included: a) Resident #55 An observation and interview with Resident #55 on 01/15/24 at 8:39 AM revealed a scabbed area to her right lower leg. She stated, It got burnt from a E-stim patch in therapy that was defaulted. Resident #55's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/04/23 noted the resident had a score of Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. A BIMS score of 15 indicates the resident is cognitively intact and has capacity. A medical record review found it was void of information from the incident mentioned in the interview. A review of the Physician's Order Summary revealed from: 12/26/23 --Silvadene External Cream 1 % (Silver Sulfadiazine) Apply to right lower leg topically everyday shift for wound for 14 Days cleanse wound, apply Silvadene and optifoam dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and operation policy the facility failed to take actions to thoroughly investigate an alleged neglect when Resident #55 received a burn from an e-stim unit. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier #55. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #55 An observation and interview with Resident #55 on 01/15/24 at 8:39 AM, revealed a scabbed area to her right lower leg. She stated, it got burnt from an E-stim patch in therapy that was defective. Resident #55's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/04/23 noted the resident had a score on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. A BIMS score of 15 indicates the resident is cognitively intact and has capacity. A medical record review found it was void of information from the incident mentioned in the interview. A review of the Physician's Order Summary revealed from: 12/26/23 --Silvadene External Cream 1 % (Silver Sulfadiazine) Apply to right lower leg topically every day shift for wound for 14 Days cleanse wound, apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to capture diagnoses upon admission and complete an updated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for the area of PASARR. Resident identifiers: #112, #51, and #39. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #112 During a medical record review on 01/16/24, it was discovered the PASARR was not updated with the admission diagnosis of major depressive disorder. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/16/24 at 9:37 AM, verified a new PASARR had not been completed to include the admission diagnosis of major depressive disorder. b) Resident #39 On 01/16/24, a record review of the resident's electronic medical record (EMR), the resident's most recent PASARR, dated 08/11/22, indicated no level II was needed. Section lll #30 MI/MR Assessment indicated no diagnosis of Major Depression. The record also revealed the resident had a diagnosis of Major Depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop a person-centered 48 hour baseline care plan for urinary tract infection (UTI). This was true for one (1) of one (1) reviewed for the care area of UTI during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #56. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #56 During a medical record review, on 01/17/24, it was discovered the baseline care plan completed within 48 hours of Resident 56's admission did not communicate the admission diagnosis of a UTI. In an interview, on with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 01/17/24 at 03:20 PM, they verified the 48 hour baseline care plan did not include the diagnosis of UTI.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives for each resident. This was true for three (3) of 17 residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: Resident #58, Resident #49, and Resident #40. Facility Census: 59 Findings Include: a) Resident #58 On 01/15/24 at 10:10AM during a tour of the facility, Resident #58 was seen to in a wheelchair with a chair alarm. A review of the medical record on 01/16/24 at 8:54 AM, found Resident # 58 was admitted on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06 and lacked capacity long term. The residents comprehensive care plan review did not identify a person centered comprehensive care plan per the standards of practice for the use of the chair alarm. On 01/16/24 at 11:36AM the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the care plan and acknowledged the chair alarm was not included in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise the residents care plan in regard to tube feeding. This failed practice was true one (1) out of one (1) reviewed for tube feeding. Resident identifier: #45. Facility census 59. Findings include: a) Resident #45 During the interview process on 01/15/24 at 9:07 AM it was noted a tube feeding pump was at bedside. Record review found the tube feeding had been on hold since 11/15/23. The current care plan still contains the following: *Enteral Feed up/on at 7PM down/off at 7 AM. *Glucerna 1.5 CAL. administer Continuous via Pump 35/ml/hour for 12 hours a day if less than 75% of meals consumed. Interview on 01/17/24 at 2 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the enteral feeding has been on hold since 11/15/23 and agreed the care plan has not been revised to the current plan of care.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident was correctly positioned to maximize eating abilities. These failed practices were a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #9. Resident Identifier: #9. Facility census 59. Findings included: a) Resident #9 Observation on 01/15/24 at 8:10 AM, found Resident #9 was trying to blindly reach for food on his tray, because his tray was not placed in front of him and was above his eye level. Resident #9 found a prepackaged cup of juice. Resident #9 was observed trying to open it for eight (8) minutes. He tried to push his finger through the top, he tried to bite it open, and then he used a spoon and finally got a hole in the top of it by using the handle of the spoon. Resident #9 drank his juice from the small hole. On 01/15/24 at 8:48 AM, Resident # 9 had managed to move the plate cover enough to get what appeared to be scrambled eggs with his fingers. On 01/15/24 at 8:51 AM, Nurse Aide #75 was asked if Resident #9 was positioned correctly to eat. NA #75 stated no he was not and walked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, family interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for dependent residents in the care area of bathing/showers and assisting during mealtime. This was true for two (2) out of two (2) residents reviewed for ADLs. Resident identifiers: #45, and #9. Facility census 59. Findings Include: a) Resident #45 A medical record review found Resident #45 suffered a Cerebral Infarction, which left her totally dependent for ADL care. During a family phone interview on 01/15/24 at 12:03 PM, with the husband of Resident #45, he stated he often must bush her hair and when she was first admitted he had to cut the hair on the back of her head almost to the scalp because it was so matted up. He also stated she did not have dandruff before coming here. He went on the say many times he felt like his wife had not been showered in a while and hair is rarely washed or brushed. A review of the facility ADL sheet called the, Documentation Survey Report v2, dated for the month of January, had the following information:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure a change in condition was completed or a skin issue was monitored for progression. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: Resident #55. Facility Census: 59. Findings Include: a) Resident #55 An observation and interview with Resident #55 on 01/15/24 at 8:39 AM, revealed a scabbed area to her right lower leg. She stated it got burnt from an Electrical Stimulation (E-stim) patch in therapy which was defective. Resident #55's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/04/23 noted the resident had a score on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. A BIMS score of 15 indicates the resident is cognitively intact and has capacity. A medical record review found it was void of information from the incident mentioned in the interview. A review of the Physician's Order Summary revealed from: 11/26/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to use a psychotropic medication to treat a specific, diagnosed, and documented condition. This was found for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #58. Facility Census 59 Findings include: a) Resident #58 A review of the medical record on 01/16/24 at 8:54 AM, found Resident # 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of Mentals Status (BIMS) score of six (6) and lacked capacity to make medical decisions. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/30/23 identified the resident suffering from disorganized thinking behavior, which fluctuates (comes and goes, changes in severity). Resident #58's diagnosis include: -- Alzheimer's disease -- unspecified dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, -- psychotic disturbance -- mood disturbance, and --anxiety -- cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to have a complete order for hospice services for Resident #40. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of hospice, during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident #40 did not have a complete order for hospice. Resident identifier: 40. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #40 During a medical record review, on 01/16/24, it was discovered the order for hospice services was incomplete. It did not include the phone contact for the hospice service provider. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/16/24 at 1:30 PM, the DON verified the order for hospice was incomplete. It did not include the phone contact for the hospice provider.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light system device was accessible for a resident while in bed. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #30. Resident identifier: #30 Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #30 On 1/15/24 at 8:07 AM during a tour of the facility, Resident #30 was seen in his bed with oxygen half off his face and he was very agitated and cursing asking to see a nurse. When asked if he had called for assistance with the use of his call light, he stated it wasn't working. The call light was lying on the floor under his bed at this time. TLSH #19 was asked to come to the room for Resident #30. Team Lead Skin Health (TLSH) #19 confirmed the resident was able to operate the call light and acknowledged Resident #30's call light was lying on the floor, out of the residents reach. TLSH #19 stated Resident #30 was very agitated about some family issues which had recently occurred and because his call light was not working and on the floor. TLSH #19 stated she had called maintenance to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to provide activities according to their interest for Resident #47 and Resident #48 and failed to develop a care plan in a timely manner for Resident #110. This practice was found true for three(3) of five (5) Residents reviewed for the Activity Care Area during the Long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: Resident #47, Resident #48 and Resident #110 Facility Census: 62 Findings Included: a) Resident #47 During the initial tour of the facility on 10/03/22 at 10:21 AM observed Resident # 47 laying in the bed, in the dark with the privacy curtain pulled, window blinds closed, and no over bed light on. Resident #47 was holding her bed comforter tag in her hand rubbing it. There was no TV/music or other sensory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promoted resident rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the facility assessment. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents currently resding in the facility. Resident Identifiers: Resident #53. Facility census: 62 Findings Included: a) Resident Council meeting During a resident council meeting held on 10/04/22 at 10:02 AM the following concerns were presented: Confidential interviews with the Resident group found the following concerns related to call lights: -Depends on how many is working how long it takes them to answer the call lights. -There can be one (1) Nurses Aide to a hallway or one (1) to the whole building. -Sometimes we wait up to an hour. -They turn off the call light then you wait a long time before they return if they come back at all.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The facility failed to label and date food items that were open and failed to dispose of expired food items. The facility also failed to accurately record dishwasher and resident refrigerator temperature logs. The facility also failed to keep the kitchen equipment sanitary. The facility also failed to have a one (1) inch space between the floor and ice machine drain in the kitchen and nourishment room ice machines. These failed practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen and nourishment room. Facility census: 62. Findings Included: The Food Service Director (FSD) was not present upon entering the facility. The [NAME] was in charge of the kitchen at the time of the initial tour. a) Pantry A review of a facility policy titled Food Storage: Receiving with a revision date of 09/17 found the following. .5. All food will be appropriately labeled and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was included in all aspects of person-centered care planning, which supported the resident's goals, choices, and preferences including, but not limited to, goals related to the their daily routines. This was true for one (1) of 22 residents reviewed for care plan involvement during the survey process. Resident identifier: Resident #15 Census; 62 Findings included: a) Resident #15 An interview, with Resident #15, on 10/03/22 at 9:53 AM, revealed the resident was not aware of the care that had been planned and stated he/she had not been invited to attend any care plan meeting. A record review , showed a Minimum Data Set (MDS), completed 08/08/22, assessing the resident to have a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) to be at a score of 11, which would indicate mild impairment. Further review of the record showed two (2) care plan meeting notices had been provided to family members on 05/26/22 and 08/25/22, but there was no evidence the resident had been invited to attend or was involved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure when a resident self administered medications, the interdisciplinary team had determined this practice was clinically appropriate. This deficient practice was identified during a random opportunity for discovery when Resident #53 was observed in the resident's room with an inhaler on the bedside table. Resident identifier: Resident #53. Census: 62. Findings included: a) Resident #53 A review of Policy NSG 309 Medications: Self-administration, revision date of 03/01/22, showed if a resident requests to self-administer medications they would be evaluated for safety and appropriateness. If it was determined the resident could self-administer medications, an order would be obtained , self administration and self-storage would be care planned, and capability re-evaluated initially , quarterly and with any change of condition. An observation on 10/03/22 at 10:17 AM, revealed an inhaler laying on the bedside table, in the resident's room, belonging to Resident #53. An interview with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide showers according to the residents preferences. This failed practice was true for one (1) of twenty-two (22) sampled residents. Resident Identifier: #26 Facility Census: 62 Findings Included: a) During the initial interview phase of the long term survey process Resident #26 complained of getting bed baths instead of showers as she preferred. According to her care plan, it is important for her to choose between a shower or a bed bath and she prefers a shower. Records indicate that she is schedule for a shower every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Documentation shows she received seven (7) out of fourteen (14) showers schedule for the last thirty-four (34) days. She received twenty-seven (27) bed baths during this time. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing during an interview on 10/04/22 at 4:45 PM. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assist residents to carry out Activities of Daily living (ADL's) including grooming and eating , when the resident was assessed to require assistance. This was true for one (1) of nine (9) residents reviewed for ADLs during the Long Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident #50 did not receive assitance with grooming as required. Resident identifier : Resident #50. Census: 62. Findings included: a) Policy review A review of Policy : NSG 200 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). with a revision date of 06/11/21, showed the facility must provide the necessary care and services when a resident was unable to carry out this function, to ensure a residents ADLs, including grooming and eating, were maintained. Documentation was required every shift when ADL assistance was provided and was to be made in the medical record. b) Resident # 50 An observation of Resident #50, on 10/03/22 at 01:38 PM, revealed the resident to have an excessive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, ,and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of three (3) residents who was reviewed for oxygen therapy. Physician's orders for the oxygen administration flow rate was not followed for Resident #53. Resident identifier: Resident #53. Census: 62 Findings included: a) Resident #53 Review of the Policy, titled : Oxygen Concentrator, revision date of 06/15/22, showed, under section 2. (10), the liter flow would be set per order. A record review, showed a current physician's order, dated 9/22/22, for Resident #53 to receive oxygen at one (1) Liter per minute via Nasal Cannula continuously. An observation was made of the flow rate of oxygen Resident #53 was receiving on 10/04/22 at 09:06 AM, in the presence of Director of Nursing (DON). The DON verified at this time the flow rate was set on three (3) liters per minute, when the order was for the resident to receive one (1) liter of oxygen per minute. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered (RN) was present at the facility for at least eight (8) consecutive hours a day seven (7) days a week. This had the potential to affect a limited number of residents residing at the facility. Facility census: 62. Findings Included: a) Registered Nursing hours During a review on 10/05/22 of the daily nurse staffing hours revealed on 10/02/22 there was no RN scheduled for that date. A review of the payroll time sheet for RN #64, revealed on 10/01/22 clocked in at 10:45 PM and clocked out at 7:30 AM. During an interview on 10/05/22 at 2:37 PM the Scheduling and Payroll Manager #68 stated there was no RN scheduled for Sunday because the RN # 64's name worked Saturday 11 PM to 7:15 AM. She acknowledged it was not 8 consecutive hours on Sunday 10/02/22. .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview and staff interview the facility failed to provide menu items according to resident preference and the facility also failed to provide notification of changes of the menu by not noting or updating on the menu and/or residents were not notified of the change, when substituting foods. This had a potential to affect all residents receiving nourishment from the facility kitchen. Resident Identifiers: Resident #13, and Resident # 18. Facility Census: 62 Findings Included: a) Resident #13 During an interview on 10/03/22 at 10:39 AM Resident #13 stated We get a lot of soup and sandwiches, the food is never good. We never receive what we are supposed to. If the menu says chicken noodle soup we get tomato soup. The menu might say hamburger and we get a ham sandwich. During a main dining room observation on 10/03/22 at 12:22 PM the Residents' meal tray tickets stated the following: Harvest Soup Egg salad sandwich lettuce and tomato Watermelon Pasta Salad During an interview on 10/03/22 at 12:53 PM the [NAME] stated there were no tomatoes or lettuce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately document the percentage of meal intake for the Resident. This was true for one (1) of twenty-two (22) records reviewed. Resident Identifier: #30 Facility Census: 62 Findings Included: a) According to Resident #30's care plan she is independent to extensive assistance with eating. The care plan also has interventions for participation in the restorative feeding program twice (2) a day, three (3) times a week as well as monitor intake of all meals. On 10/04/22 this surveyor witnessed Restorative Aid (RA) #9 attempt to feed Resident #30. The Resident would not wake up enough to eat. After attempting to feed the Resident for approximately fifteen (15) minutes the RA took the resident back to her room. The Resident did not eat anything. Restorative Aide #9 did not provide any documentation concerning the lunch meal However, Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) #34 documented that the resident feed herself and ate 100% of the meal. This was incorrect. CNA #34 was not in the dining room during the lunch meal and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS OPERATIONS VI LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/31/2011
HC 63 OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/01/2023
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
ABRUZZINO, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
HAHN, JERRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/23/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+30.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$548K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 7%Other / private 14%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $548K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$303per resident / day
operating cost
$9,225per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$435per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515176. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next