Salem Center
255 Sunbridge Drive, Salem, WV 26426 · For profit - Corporation · 112 certified beds · (304) 782-3000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.0% | 14.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.8% | 7.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 4.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.9% | 15.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.9% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.0% | 22.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.0% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.1% | 79.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.7% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.2% | 11.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.43 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.37 | 1.84 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 25.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.7%CMS range 26.9–53.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.0–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 25.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 16.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.1–12.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 82.3 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.11 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents in rooms 126, 127, 130, 162, and 163. This was also true for the kitchen and the Shower room, This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 87. Findings included: a) Upon survey entrance on 06/01/25 at 10:45 am , it was observed the following issues in these resident Rooms: Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: - toilet seat broken and missing - 1/2 inch size chips in the drywall in bathroom below the light switch - scuff marks in drywall behind the head of resident B's bed Residnet room [ROOM NUMBER]: -Toilet tank lid missing, paint chipped above tissue holder, Scrapes in drywall below light switch Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]: - crack in chair rail behind bed A, - paint peeling right wall below the light switch, - unfinished drywall patch beside tissue paper holder, - brownish stains on the floor at the base of the toilet, - foot rail loose on resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain and ensure infection control standards were followed in several areas. Specifically, there were issues with the suction machine, and wheelchairs with tears in the cushions. The laundry room ' s ventilation system was inoperable, and appropriate infection control protocols were not implemented while using the facility ' s transport van to transport soiled linen to the laundromat over a span of 3 to 4 months. Additionally, there were deficiencies in infection control practices related to the cleaning and disinfection of reusable resident equipment. In addition, the facility also failed to provide appropriate infection surveillance and did not implement measures for the surveillance and prevention of legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens. This included a lack of control measures, such as flushing and draining dead legs and checking and flushing fixtures in unoccupied resident rooms, including unused showers and bedpan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were provided education/training on how to use the fire compression system. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility Census 87 Findings included: During a kitchen visit on 6/3/25 at 2:15 PM, It was observed there was not a manual pull chain for the fire system. When asked, the kitchen staff did not know how to manually activate the fire hood to extinguish a fire. Upon speaking with maintenance department, he showed the staff and survey team the button to activate the fire hood, until that moment, the kitchen staff did not know how to activate the fire compression system . On 06/03/25 at 2:24 PM, in an interview with the Maintenance Director, he verified there was a button staff can push to activate the fire compression system in case of a fire.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable, visually appealing, and served in a manner consistent with residents' preferences. The facility was unable to incorporate individualized dietary preferences into the care planning process, was unable to deliver food met resident expectations for seasoning and appeal, and failed to ensure systemic measures were in place to verify meal quality through test trays. Environmental issues and kitchen disorganization further contributed to diminished quality of meal service. These failed practices had the potential to contribute to resident dissatisfaction, poor nutritional intake, and a decline in quality of life. This was true for Five (5) of five (5) residents reviewed for food satisfaction. Resident Identifiers: #31, #52. #66, #50 and #23. Facility census: 87. Findings: a) Resident #31 On 06/02/25 at 1:02 PM, Resident #31 was interviewed and stated meals were bland, sometimes cold, and sometimes served late. The resident stated individual preferences were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to properly store food in accordance with professional standards. This is true for the facility kitchen and nourishment pantries. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census 87. Findings Included: a) On 06/02/25 at 11:35 am during the Initial Brief Tour of Kitchen, with the Kitchen Account Manager the following issues were found in the kitchen pantry, cooler, and utensil drawers : Pantry: - Spices in the cooking area left open and exposed. - Corn muffins mix box was left open and exposed. - Box of elbow noodles stored labeled with no opening date or expiration date. - Spaghetti with an expiration date of 5/9/25 still in the pantry on 6/2/25. b) Cooler: - Staff personal drinks (An energy drink and a mountain dew) were found in the kitchen cooler c) Cleanliness: - Food spills in the floor at/near food prep area not cleaned up. _ Metal basin pan left in the floor next to the wall and stove. d) Utensil Drawers:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0907 — patternProvide enough space and equipment to meet each resident's needs
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient hallway space and equipment r/t resident wheel chairs lined up down both sides of the hallway on Hill Top Front Hall leaving no direct path. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census 87 Findings Included: Observation: On 06/03/25 at 3:30 PM, it was observed in the Hill Top Front Hallway, the resident wheel chairs were lined up on both sides of the hallway leaving all who walked through without a direct path. Staff Interview: In an Interview with The Facility Administrator on 6/4/25 at approx 2:50PM, she acknowledged the insufficient space/direct path for walking down the Hill Top Front Hallway.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, inspection, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. Location Identifiers: Laundry rooms and Shower rooms. Facility Census:87. Findings Include: a) Laundry Rooms On 06/03/25, at approximately 1:20 PM, an inspection of the laundry rooms was conducted, accompanied by the Regional Director of Maintenance (RDM) #90. During the inspection, it was noted the venting system in the dirty laundry room, which is responsible for maintaining negative pressure in the room, was not operational. Additionally, the air conditioning unit in the clean laundry room was also non-functional. The failure to maintain the venting system's operational status created a potential risk of harm to residents, staff, and visitors at the facility. The venting system was designed to create negative pressure in the dirty laundry room, which helped prevent microorganisms from moving into the clean laundry room. However, the lack of negative pressure in the dirty laundry room could potentially allow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0923 — patternHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate ventilation in the shower rooms and dirty laundry rooms. This failed practice had the potential to harm multiple residents at the facility. Location Identifiers: Shower rooms and Dirty laundry room. Facility Census:87 Findings include: a) Shower Rooms: On 06/03/25, at approximately 1:14 PM, an inspection of the two shower rooms was conducted, accompanied by Regional Maintenance Director (RMD) #90. It was observed the venting system was not operational. RMD #90 confirmed repairs were underway to restore the venting system as quickly as possible. The shower rooms were humid and had a musty odor. Additionally, the shower stall walls had a black substance present on them, and several shower chairs had a brown substance on the underside of the seats and on the chair legs. Warm, humid environments can increase the likelihood of mold growth on surfaces. Mold-related infections can impact the lungs, sinuses, skin, and in rare instances, other organs. These infections can be severe and potentially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure transfer/discharge notice was given prior to residents leaving the facility. THis was found true for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for closed record review regarding hospitalization and discharge. Resident identifier: #89 Facility Census: 89 Findings Include: During a record review on 06/04/25 at 3:30 PM of Resident #89's record no transfer/discharge notice was found, documentation was requested from the Director of Nursing (DON)) and the Administrator. On 06/05/25 at 9:14 AM, the Administrator stated we do not have the transfer/discharge for Resident #89, they went out for a procedure then went home and I guess they (facility staff) didn't think they needed to do it for some reason. Confirming no transfer/discharge paperwork was completed.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility Census 87 Findings included: a) Kitchen side sink counter: On the initial vist to the kitchen on 06/02/25 at 11:45AM, it was observed that boxes and trash were in the floor next to a full trash cane beside the side sink counter and stacked containers of food left on the side sink counter in the kitchen during lunch prep. b) Dumpster Area: On 06/03/25, at approximately 1:40PM it was observed there were 3 dumpsters: - The left dumpster was found with a broken tree branch protruding from the drainage pipe, blocking drainage. - The middle dumpster was found with a garbage bag and used clear gloves scattered on the ground behind it. - The right dumpster was found to have a plastic garbage bag with trash in it, protruding from the drainage pipe blocking drainage. Staff interviews: In an interview with the Kitchen Account Manager on 06/02/25 at 11:45AM, she stated the stacked containers were expired food that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident notified of progress toward resolution. This is true for 0ne (1) of one (1) residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier: #72. Facility census: 84. Findings Included: a) Policy review Record review of the facility's policy titled, grievance /concern, showed: -Upon receipt of the grievance / concern, the grievance / concern form will be initiated by staff member receiving the concern. -Upon receipt of the grievance /concern form, the Administrator or designee will document the grievance / concern on the grievance / concern log. - Immediate action will be taken to prevent further potential violations of any patient right while the alleged violation is being investigated. -Notify the person filing the grievance of resolution in a timely manner. b) Resident #72 On 10/23/23 at 12:52 PM during an interview with Resident #72 she stated that she made a complaint about another Resident peering in her room, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to have cans with uncompromised seals, dishware stored inverted or covered, supplies stored off the floor, and clean sanitized mobile utility food carts. This has the potential to affect all residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census. 84. Findings included: a) Kitchen tour During Initial tour on 10/23/23 at 10:44 AM found: 1- two (2) food #10 cans with dented compromised seals. 2- two (2) mobile utility carts with food on them, having old food and other debris on all three (3) shelves. 3-dish stored inverted with dust and debris in bowls and cups. 4- Items such as open paper towels in the dry storage, stored on the floor. An Interview with the Dietary Manager during initial tour verified all issues noted. She stated that she was unaware of the issues, and she would fix the issues.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical information contained in the electronic health record. This deficient practice was based on a random opportunity for discovery for Resident #17, whose Medication Administration Record (MAR) was not secured but left open and visible for all who passed by the area to view. Resident identifier: Resident #17. Census: 84. Findings included: a) Resident #17 A review of Policy 0PS209 Privacy Rights :Patient, dated 11/28/16. noted the patient has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of there personal and medical records. An observation of medication administration, on 10/24/23 at 08:25 AM, revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #74 prepared the medications and entered Resident #17's room to administer the medications. RN #74 failed to secure the computer screen before leaving the cart, leaving the medical and personal information of Resident #17 available to view by any passerby. The information that was in plain view, included the resident's name and room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to identify a psychiatric diagnosis of depression for Resident #78. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident Identifier: #78. Facility Census: 84. Findings Included: a) Resident #78 On 10/24/23 at 9:43 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #78. The review found the resident was prescribed Cymbalta (antidepressant) 30mg (milligram) daily for depression with a start date of 09/22/23. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/27/23 was reviewed and section I (psychiatric/mood disorder) found a no which indicates the resident did not have a diagnosis of depression. On 10/25/23 at 11:04 AM, an interview was held with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated, there is no documented diagnosis of depression listed on the MDS. No further information was obtained during the long-term survey process.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PAS) reflected pre-admission diagnoses for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for the category of PASARR, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifier #77. Census 84. Findings Included: a) Resident #77 On 10/16/23, a record review of the resident's electronic medical record (EMR), found the resident's admission PASARR, dated 06/09/23, indicated no level II was needed. Section lll #30 MI/MR Assessment indicated None. A continued record also revealed the resident received a psych diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder on the diagnosis listed on admission [DATE] but did not receive a new PAS to address whether or not specialized services were needed. On 10/24/23 at 1:24 PM, an interview with the Administrator confirmed the admission PAS presented to the surveyor did not indicate a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and a new PAS was not completed for schizoaffective disorder upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a care plan regarding refusal of care for Resident #82 and the use of a right hand splint for Resident #76. This was true for two (2) of 18 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #82 and #76. Facility Census: 84. Findings Included: a) Resident #82 On 10/23/23 at 11:15 AM, the resident was observed and appeared to be somewhat disheveled. A record review was completed on 10/23/23 at 12:16 PM. The review found multiple refusals of showers and bed baths documented. The resident had only two (2) showers documented in September, 2023 and one (1) shower and two (2) bed baths documented in October, 2023. The following dates of refusals are as follows: --09/18/23 --09/21/23 --09/27/23 --09/29/23 --09/30/23 --10/02/23 --10/03/23 --10/06/23 --10/09/23 --10/11/23 --10/16/23 --10/18/23 The care plan indicates the resident needs extensive assistance of one (1) staff member for bathing. However, the care plan does not list refusals of care under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for one (1) of 18 sampled residents, when an assessment was made with additional information obtained regarding resident's care and or behavior. Resident #47 was known by staff to adjust/alter oxygen flow rates but this behavior was not included in the resident's care plan revision. Resident identifier: Resident #47. Census: 84. Findings included: a) Resident #47 An observation, on 10/22/23 at 12:22 PM, showed oxygen was being administered to Resident #47 at a rate of 4.5 liters/minute (L/min). During the observation, the resident's spouse revealed, Resident #47 would adjust the flow rate depending on how he was feeling. Resident #47 confirmed this. A record review revealed Resident #47 was to receive oxygen at 3.0 L/min via nasal cannula continuously as resident will allow every day and night shift. A review of the current comprehensive resident centered care plan, last review of 08/11/23, showed the resident was diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and was to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order regarding right hand splint application for Resident #76 and complete neurological (neuro) checks after a fall for Resident #17. This was true for two (2) of 18 residents reviewed during the long-term survey process. Resident Identifiers: #76 and #17. Facility Census: 84. Findings Included: a) Resident #76 On 10/23/23 at 11:46 AM, an initial observation found a right hand splint laying on the night stand by Resident #76's bed. The resident was asked, when do you wear your splint? The resident responded, I haven't worn it since I've been out of therapy. On 10/24/23 at 12:18 PM, an additional observation was made of the right hand splint laying on night stand. The resident was again asked, have you worn your hand splint? The resident responded, nope .they haven't put it on me. On 10/24/23 at 12:42 PM, a physician's order dated 09/06/23 was found. The physician's order stated, Patient to donn R (right) hand splint for up to 6 (six) hr/day (hours per day) or as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received care consistent with professional standards of practice following physician's orders to treat pressure sores. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Protocol for the care area of pressure ulcers. Resident #17 was not provided the treatment in accordance with physician's orders. Resident identifier: Resident #17. Census: 84. Findings included: An interview, with Resident #17, on 10/23/23 at 1:27 PM, revealed the resident was receiving cream to an area on the back and buttocks due to having had problems with pressure ulcer development. An observation of the treatment , performed by Registered Nurse (RN) #74 on 10/24/23 at 12:30 PM, revealed RN #74, cleansed the area on Resident #17's back and buttocks with Wound cleanser and applied and Optifoam dressing to both areas. A record review , of the treatment orders, did not include an order for wound cleanser and an Optifoam dressing. for the area treated on the back and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for Nurse Aide (NA) #66. This was true for one (1) of five (5) employees reviewed under the care area of sufficient and competent staffing. Facility Census: 84. Findings Included: a) Nurse Aide (NA) #66 A review of nursing aide requirements was completed on 10/24/23 at 1:00 PM. The review found NA #66 did not have a current performance evaluation. The last documented performance evaluation was completed in 2019. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/24/23 at 1:50 PM was completed. The DON stated, NA #66 has not had a performance evaluation since 2019 .she worked infrequently while going to nursing school and she was prn (as needed), now she is back. On 10/24/23 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed a performance evaluation should have been completed. No further information was obtained during the long-term survey process.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not administered a psychotropic drug unless, based on a comprehensive assessment of the resident, the drug was medically necessary to treat a specific condition with behaviors monitored to ensure effectiveness of the medication prescribed. Resident #6 and Resident #78 were receiving an anti-psychotic medication, however, behavior monitoring did not contain a documented specific behavior to be observed and monitored. This failed practice was identified in two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the LTCSP. Resident identifier: Resident #6 and #78. Census: 84 Findings included: a) Resident #6 A record review was completed for Resident #80 on 10/25/23 at 9:54 AM. The review found the resident was taking an anti-psychotic medication (Abilify) for Schizo-affective disorder. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed and found a physician's order for Abilify (Aripiprazole) 0.5 mg. Give 0.5 tablet by mouth one time per day for Schizoaffective. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record. Specifically, a grievance that was reported. This practice affected one (1) of one (1), residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier #72. Facility census: # 84. Findings Included: a) Resident #72 On 10/23/23 at 12:52 PM during an interview with Resident #72 she stated, she made a complaint about another Resident peering in her room, a month ago. Resident #72 stated that nothing was ever done about the issue. 10/23/23 a record review of the grievances log revealed no issues were documented for Resident #72. A continued record review of Resident #72's Quarterly 09/07/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS), found the resident's brief interview for mental status was fifteen (15) the highest score obtainable. Resident #72 has capacity. 10/25/23 at 9:29 AM during an Interview the Social Worker (SW) #67 stated she was aware of the concern, and she stated she educated the male resident #11 and followed up with resident #72 at the time of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and staff interview, Resident Council grievances were not addressed timely. This is true for five of 27 reviewed. Resident identifiers #77, #63, #42, #44 and #64. Facility Census 82 Findings included; a) Resident Council On 05/17/22 02:00 PM, residents #77, #63, #42, #44 and #64 voiced that meeting after meeting the issues brought up from previous meetings are the same issues that are never addressed or resolved. Resident Council President #77 stated, for example snacks not always provided, showers not give on days assigned, foods not always hot, beds not always made timely or sheets changed after showers, water not always passed and shower rooms only has a couple showers that actually work. On 5/19/22 at 12:45 PM, interview with Activity Director (AD) concerning resident council meeting for 5/10/22 meetings under administration stated, don't feel issues get resolved timely, or they come back again later in time. AD stated, yes the residents who attended resident council on 5/10/22 meeting did voice concerns about issues not getting resolved when brought…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement a care plan to address residents' medical needs for pressure ulcer care, eye eversion and the use of an anticoagulant. This was true for three (3) of 27 care plans reviewed. Resident identifiers #50, #41 and #26. Facility census: 82. Findings included: a) Resident #50 A review of Resident #50's medical record showed a diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer of right buttock, stage two (2). A physician order dated 04/01/22 stated, Cleanse stage 2 pressure ulcer of right upper buttock with wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply thin layer of Chamosyn cream. Complete at least 2 times daily and as needed during turning and repositioning. Skin Check assessments dated 04/16/22 through 05/13/22 stated Resident had a stage 2 right upper buttocks. The care plan was reviewed with no pressure ulcer care or treatment addressed. During an Interview on 05/18/22 at 10:30 AM, Center Reimbursement Coordinator (CRC) #49 stated the pressure ulcer was not addressed on the current care plan as it appeared to have been resolved by accident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-19 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all resident are offered an evening snack. This failed practice has the potential to affect all residents who receive snacks from the kitchen. resident identifiers #77, #63, #42, #44 and #64. Facility Census 82 Findings included; a) Snacks On 05/17/22 2:00 PM resident council meeting concerning snacks not always being offered or being available. Resident Council President #77 stated, for example, one evening there were no snacks at all in the pantries and the kitchen was locked up so, no snacks could be obtained. There are usually no snacks for diabetics to consume. Resident Council #77 stated, around the first week of May 2022 there we no snacks available and the nursing staff put their money together to go purchase snacks at the local grocery store and spend $145.00 worth of snacks so residents could have snacks. Residents #63, #42, #44 and #64 all agreed. On 05/18/22 at 9:00 AM, interview with Dietary Manager (DM) regarding snacks and how many snacks are taken to pantry on units and how often. DM stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to properly label and date food items stored in the refrigerators in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety. The facility failed to complete daily temperature checks for the kitchen area reach-in refrigerator. The failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 82. Findings included: A record review of the facility's policy titled Food and Nutrition Services Policies and Procedures revised date 06/15/18 stated, All foods are labeled with name of product and the date received and use by date once opened. Food and nutrition services employees observe and record equipment temperatures daily according to the Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Standards. a) Walk-in Refrigerator An observation of the walk-in refrigerator, on 05/16/22 at 11:10 AM, showed food items that were opened or pre-made with no labels or dates. The food items were as followed: - One (1) opened container of Beef Base with no receive or use by date - One (1) metal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep an accurate antibiotic line listing and failed to discard biohazard materials appropriately. This failed practice had the potential to more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #11, #49, and #50. Facility Census: 82 Findings included: a) Resident #11 and #49 Based on record review the antibiotic line listing was not completed in its entirety. This was confirmed with Registered Nurse (RN) #32 on 05/19/22 at 2:25 PM. On the March Line List and the 2022 Running list there are two Residents that are currently on antibiotics that are not on the line listing. They are Resident #11 and #49. Both orders are prophylactic. Resident #11 had Augmentin started on 01/10/22 with no stop date and Resident #49 had Macrobid started on 01/13/22 with no stop date. b) Resident #50 An observation on 05/16/22 at 12:52 PM showed a clear bag of brown substance laying on the floor by Resident #50's bathroom door. During an interview on 05/16/22 at 12:52 PM, Resident #50 stated that the bag was trash. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 27 residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process had advance directives completed as recognized by State Law. Resident #49 did not have a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form signed by the individual making decisions on behalf of the resident. Resident identifier: #49. Census: 82. Findings included: a) Resident #49 A record review showed a POST form, dated 01/14/2022. The form contained verbal consent by Resident #49's decision maker. No other update with the resident representative's signature was found. An interview, with Social Services employee #3, (SS#3) on 05/17/22 at 11:45 AM, revealed the facility had no signed POST form for Resident #49. SS #3 stated the facility felt it was adequate to obtain verbal consent and no other signature was required. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 05/18/22 at 11:57 AM, verified only verbal consent was obtained for Resident #49's POST form. It was stated further by the DON, the facility would use verbal consent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on random observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Resident's medical information was secured in a manner that protected personal, medical and health information. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier #73. Facility census: 82. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy titled privacy rights: Patients. Effective date 06/01/96 with revisions 11/28/16 revealed the following: --The patient has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his/her personal and medical records. a) Resident #73 On 05/19/22 at 10:40 AM, an observation of the computer monitor displaying an electronic medical record for Resident #73. The medication cart was left unattended, on top of the Hilltop-hall. The cart was in a place easily accessible to residents, visitors, or other unauthorized persons. On 05/19/22 at 10:42 AM, during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), it was confirmand the information was in view. The ADON stated that resident information should never be in view of guests or visitors. She closed and locked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, facility documentation review and staff interview the facility failed to make efforts to resolve a resident's grievance as indicated by the actions taken to investigate the concern on the grievance form. This was a random opportunity for discovery. The failed practice was true for one (1) of one (1) grievance forms reviewed. Resident identifier: #34. Facility census: 82. Findings included: a) Resident #34 During an interview on 05/16/22 at 2:45 PM, Resident #34 stated that currently there was a grievance made against Nurse Aide (NA) #45. Resident #34 stated a grievance form was completed because NA #45 documented assistance was given to Resident #34 for a shower however Resident #34 was adamant that NA #45 did not assist with showering on two (2) separate occasions. Resident #34 stated that information on the results of grievance was wanted. Resident #34 stated the only knowledge available was Residents are only allowed two (2) showers per week. Review of the facility's grievance logs verified a grievance form dated 04/27/22. The grievance form completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, record review, facility documentation review and staff interview the facility failed to provide a resident with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in the form of a shower. This was true for one (1) of four (4) Residents review for ADL care. Resident identifier: # 34. Facility census: 82. Findings included: a) Resident # 34 During an interview on 05/16/22 at 2:45 PM, Resident #34 stated that currently there was a grievance made against Nurse Aide (NA) #45. Resident #34 stated a grievance form was completed because NA #45 documented assistance was given to Resident #34 for a shower however Resident #34 was adamant that NA #45 did not assist with showering on two (2) separate occasions. Resident #34 stated that information on the results of grievance was wanted. Resident #34 stated the only knowledge available was Residents are only allowed two (2) showers per week. Review of the facility's grievance logs verified a grievance form dated 04/27/22. The grievance form completed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physicians orders in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident identifiers: #67 and #49. Facility Census: 82 Resident #67 a) Resident #67 has a current order for HYDROcodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 7.5-325 MG *Controlled Drug* Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Pain 6-10 related to PAIN, UNSPECIFIED (R52) For pain 6-10, using pain scale 0-10. According to the Medication Administration Report (MAR) he was administered the HYDROcodone-Acetaminophen Tablet 7.5-325 MG twenty one (21) times in April 2022 and May 2022 for a pain level less than six (6). This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing during an interview on 5/18/22 at 12:30 PM b) Resident #49 A record review for Resident #49 showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Idiopathic constipation. Physician's orders included the following protocol to administer in case of Resident #49 not having bowel movement (BM)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery of a medication cart unlocked and unattended. Facility Census: 82. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medication, Biologicals. Effective date 12/01/07 with revisions 01/01/22 revealed the following: --Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals are stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. a) Hilltop Hall Medication Cart On 05/19/22 at 10:40 AM, An observation of an unlocked, unattended medication cart on the Hilltop Hall. The cart was in a place easily accessible allowing access to these medication by residents, unauthorized persons, or visitors. On 05/19/22 at 10:42 AM, during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), it was confirmand the Medication cart was unlocked. The ADON verified that the medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP) for the area of nutrition. Resident identifiers: #49 and #9. Census: 82 Findings included: a.) Resident #49 A record review for Resident #49 showed the weight for Resident #49 on 01/13/22 to be 189.3 lbs and the resident's weight to be 170.3 lbs on 04/13/22, indicative of a 10.4 percent weight loss. The resident also had a weight of 175.5 lbs on 04/05/22 and a weight of 164.6 lbs recorded on 05/05/22 indicating a significant weight loss of 6.21 percent in one (1) month. Further review of the medical record showed a nutritional assessment noting the resident required increased nutritional needs and the facility would offer alternate food choices if less than 50%…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that nursing assistants (NA's) received 12 annual hours of training a year including dementia training and abuse prevention. This was true for two (2) of five (5) employee files that were reviewed. Employee Identifiers: #26 and #57. Facility census: 82. Findings include: a) Employee #26 On 05/19/22 during a review of Employee #26, nursing assistant (NA), personnel record found she was hired 08/26/14. Further review of her personnel record found her list of trainings for the past 12 months found no dementia training or abuse prevention training. On 05/19/22 at 10:04 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), was asked if all employee training were contained within their employee file. The DON Verified that NA #26 did not have the required trainings for dementia or abuse. b) Employee #57 On 05/19/22 during a review of Employee #57, nursing assistant (NA), personnel record found he was hired 12/01/12. Further review of her personnel record found his list of trainings for the past 12 months found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The Hilltop medication room refrigerator and medication cart was not locked and unattended. This is true for one (1) of two (2) units. Facility Census 82. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medication, Biologicals. Effective date 12/01/07 with revisions 01/01/22 revealed the following: -- Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals are stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. -- Controlled Substances stored in the refrigerator must be in a separate container and double locked. a) Hilltop Hall Medication Cart On 05/19/22 at 10:40 AM, An observation of an unlocked, unattended medication cart on the Hilltop Hall. The cart was in a place easily accessible allowing access to these medication by residents, unauthorized persons, or visitors. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to provide food preferences in a timely manner. This failed practice has the potential to affect all residents who receive nutrients from the kitchen. resident identifier #12. Facility Census 82 Findings included; a) Resident #12 food preferences On 05/16/22 at 11:20 AM interview with Resident #12 revealed the menu is not always correct and they do not always get what is on their ticket. Resident also stated they were suppose to receive tomato soup with lunch and did not receive any soup. They further stated their dislikes and likes are not on the ticket. On 05/16/22 at 11:40 AM, interview with Regional Dietary Manger (RDM) asking to see preference sheet for Resident #12 and RDM stated after looking, there is not a preference sheet for the resident. Asked when preference sheets are obtained once admitted and how often are the preference sheets updated. RDM stated, within 5 (five) days of admission and then after every 6 (six) months at the minimum. The goal is to try and update quarterly. Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUNBRIDGE CARE ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 02/02/2015 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| REGENCY HEALTH SERVICES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUNBRIDGE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/01/2012 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2012 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| WELLMAN, STACY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/20/2023 |
| ORVIK, BENNETT | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 93% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $643K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515071. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.