Canterbury Center
80 Maddex Drive, Shepherdstown, WV 25443 · For profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (304) 876-9422 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Apr 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.5% | 14.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.3% | 7.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.9% | 4.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.6% | 15.9% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.0% | 27.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.2% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.4% | 22.1% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.1% | 13.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.8% | 79.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.5% | 22.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.0% | 11.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.80 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.51 | 1.84 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 72% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.7%CMS range 41.4–60.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.9–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.4–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 60.9 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the rooms are being kept in a clean/comfortable/homelike environment for four (4) of nine (9) rooms throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Room identifiers: #301, #305, #306. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) room [ROOM NUMBER] On 07/12/26 at 11:45 AM the following observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom: A bed pan was placed on the floor. Also, in the room trash debris was on the floor between and under the beds. Nursing Assistant #24, verified the bed pan should have been off floor and the room cleaned, stating On the weekends house keeping is scheduled one person usually. b) room [ROOM NUMBER] In room [ROOM NUMBER] trash can had trash overflowing under the sink and in bathroom. Nursing Assistant #24 verified the room and bathroom needed cleaned. c) room [ROOM NUMBER] On 07/12/26 at around 12:00 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER] the state surveyor (SS) observed the trash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident interviews, record review and staff interviews. The facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely fashion to ensure residents needs are met, additionally the facility failed to ensure resident's received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, physician's orders were not followed. For five (5) of (22) residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Facility census 59.Resident indicators. #8, #39, #41 and #79, #4 Findings include; a)Review of grievance reports: -02/10/26 grievance of long call light times -02/17/26 grievance of long call light times evening and night shifts -03/03/26 grievance of long call light times during the day -03/10/26 grievance of call light are slow to being answered -03/17/26 grievance of long call light times on night and early morning shifts -04/24/26 grievance of long call light time -04/24/26 grievance of long call light time -04/24/26 grievance of long call light time -04/24/26 grievance of long call light time -04/24/26 grievance of long call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were acknowledged by the physician. This was true for one (4) of Five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of unnecessary medication. Facility Census: 59. Resident identifiers: #43, #4, #54, and #56. Findings Included: a) Resident #43 The Consultant Pharmacist (CP) completed a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) on 10/21/25. The Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommended (as Written): The resident was prescribed diclofenac gel 1% to knees twice daily for pain relief. The current order did not specify the amount. Recommended dosing for diclofenac gel.: Upper Extremity: Apply 2g gel each affected area up to 4 times daily (maximum dose per joint is 16g/day) Lower extremity: Apply 4g to each affected are up to 4 times daily(maximum daily dose per joint of 8g/day) Maximum Daily dose (ll joints combined): 32g/day Please update the resident's diclofenac gel 1% order to specify the amount of grams to be applied. The physician did not respond to or acknowledge this recommendation. The CP completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure palatable food. The noon meal on 07/12/26 was served late and cold causing food to be too tough to cut or chew. This was a random opportunity for discovery that had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers: #47, #9, #19, #44, #37, #28, #2, #36, #25, #11, #4, #43, #78, #14, #57, #60. Facility Census: 59 Findings Included: a) During the first kitchen visit on 07/12/26 at 11:55 AM, kitchen staff reported that due to being short-staffed, no residents would be served in the dining room at the usual time of 12:00PM. A short time later at 12:10 PM, the kitchen was notified that because the state is here the dining room had to be open. The Dietary Manager had already placed usual dining room resident's meal tickets back in the stack for room delivery. Dining room observation on 12:25 PM revealed Resident #47, #9. #19, #44, #37, #28, #2, #36, #25, and #11 were in the dining room at 12:25 PM waiting to be served. At 12:40 pm, The frist trays served in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to properly store food in accordance with professional standards. This was true for the facility kitchen and nourishment pantry. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census: 59 Findings included: a) Initial Kitchen Visit: On 07/12/26 at 11:44 AM, during an Initial Brief Tour of the Kitchen, with the Dietary Manager (DM) the DM acknowledged the following:- in the walk in cooler, an opened box of bacon not sealed and left open to air- in the refrigerator, a ketchup container with a hole the corner of the lid exposing the condiment to open air, - in both of the 2 (two) utensil drawers, the scoops were not stored all in the same direction. b) Nourisment room walkthrough: On 07/13/26 at 11:15AM during a walk through in the nourishment room with the Dietary Manager (DM) the DM acknowledged the following: the refigerator thermometer found the temperature inside was 48 degrees. The Dietary Manager stated she would request maintenance to check it. c) Facility Food Storage Policy:On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity during the lunch dining experience. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #54. Facility census: 59 Findings included: a) Resident #54 An observation of meal service on 07/09/26 at 12:40 PM, found Nurse Aide (NA) #66 standing over Resident #54 assisting with his lunch meal. During an interview on 01/12/26 at 12:19 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) verified that staff should assist residents with meals while sitting beside them, not standing over the resident.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #38 had a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his / her other preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. This practice affected one (1) of (22) resident's care plans reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). The failure to ensure the comprehensive care plan was developed for the resident's highest practicable well-being placed the residents at risk of not receiving services that would meet their desires or wants and a decreased quality of life. Resident Identifiers: #38. Facility census: 59.Findings included:a) Resident #38Review of the medical records for Resident #38 revealed a preference for no male caregivers in the special instructions. Subsequent review of the comprehensive care plan and physician orders indicated that the instruction for no male care givers was only documented within the special instructions section rather than integrated into the primary care goals or active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of one (1) resident received the assistance needed with activities of daily living. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 59. a) Resident #4 During an interview with the State Surveyor (SS) on 07/12/26 at 2:00 PM Resident #4 stated she had not had a shower in three (3) weeks. She stated she was supposed to get a shower every Monday and Friday. She became teary-eyed and stated, My hair is greasy and I cannot do it by myself. Resident #4 had capacity to make medical decisions. On 07/13/26 at 12:08 PM the SS spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON), the Clinical Lead Nurse (CLN) and the Administrator (ADM) about Resident #4 stating that she was not getting showers as she would like to. On 07/13/26 at 12:16 PM the CLN gave the SS a copy of Resident #4's bathing documentation from her medical record. It did show that Resident #4 was receiving bed baths instead of showers. On 07/13/26 at 1:30 PM the SS asked the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment under its control was as free from accident hazards as possible. An observation of Resident #28's room found a spray bottle of disenfectant cleaner on her bedside dresser. Additionally, observations revealed a housekeeping cart and a treatment cart were left unlocked and unattended, and doors to central supply and the service hall were also found unlocked. These failed practices presented random opportunities for discovery and could affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #28 On 07/13/26 at 2:10 PM, a white/green spray bottle of disinfectant/cleaner was observed sitting on Resident #28's bedside dresser which was witnessed and confirmed by Housekeeping (HK) #82 and #101. HK #82 removed it and took it to the Director of Nursing (DON). During an an intervew with the DON, on 07/13/26 at 2:20 PM, she acknowledged the spray bottle of cleaner was found in Resident #28's room and stated she was going to check with the family to see…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the accuracy of medical records for its residents. Specifically for wanderguards and their tracking and use. This was discovered during the normal long term survey process and has the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #42. Facility census: 59.Findings included:a) Resident #42During a record review of Resident #42's chart performed on [DATE] at approximately 12:00 PM, it was discovered that Resident #42 was still wearing a wonderguard (a device that is placed upon a resident who wanders for safety), but the order had expired. The wanderguard orders were set to expire at the end of [DATE]. It was currently [DATE] and the same wanderguard was still on the resident. The orders included a note to Check placement and function daily and note in the medical administration record (MAR). The staff had been making notes in the MAR as checked but this was filed under an area that showed very the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment by not providing housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure that residents' rooms were being kept in a clean and sanitary condition. Room Identifiers: #103, #104, #108, #110, #302, #304, #307B, #401, #402, #404 #408, 400 Wing hallway, and Shower Room. Resident Identifier: #47. Facility Census: 59. Findings Include: a) Observation of the facility interior upon survey entry on 03/10/25 at 5:30AM: room [ROOM NUMBER] had approximately 3 foot section of section of unfinished drywall above heads of beds The 400 hallway above the resident's room doors had rips in the wall paper borders room [ROOM NUMBER], unfinished dry wall patches on the wall above the head of both resident's beds - Bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had a yellowish stain around base of toilet, and over-flowing trash can. In an interview on 03/10/25 at approximately 5:45 AM, with RN employee identifier #25, he acknowledged the unfinished drywall on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment, over which they had control, was as free from accident hazards as possible in regards to water temperatures. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Room Identifiers: Rooms #101, #107, #202, and #302. Facility census:59. Findings Include: a) Resident #1 During an interview on 03/10/25, at 9:13 AM, Resident #1 stated that the water is too hot for her. She stated that she has never been burnt but must ask the staff to make the water temperature cooler. During an inspection of Resident #1s sink water temperature, this surveyor had to pull my hand back from the sink water due to hot temperatures. b) Water Temperatures During an interview and inspection with the Maintenance Director (MD) #56 on 03/10/25 at approximately 10:30 AM the water temperature was found: -- room [ROOM NUMBER], the sink temperature reading was 128 degrees Fahrenheit. MD #56 stated that once the water had been left running for a while, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the Facility failed ensure they had sufficient and competent nurse staffing by failing to complete competency evaluations for Nurse Aides. This is true for five of five Nurse Aide charts reviewed. Findings included: Review of staff files on 03/12/25 at 1:57 PM revealed no competency evaluations for the following staff: #28, #1, #2, #33, #63 Interview with Consulting Administrator on 03/12/25 at approximately 2:30 PM revealed that the facility was behind on competencies and that there were no records for competencies in the last year for the following staff: #28, #1, #2, #33, #63
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and equipment manual review the facility failed to have a clean, sanitized kitchen, store food in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility also failed to keep the ice machine in safe operating condition. This has the ability to affect all Residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen, also attends food related activities. Facility Census: 61 Findings included: a) Initial Kitchen tour. During the initial kitchen tour with the Kitchen Account Manager on 03/10/25 at 11:54 AM, an observation found --Walk-in refrigerator - Temperatures not documented -- Walk -in freezer - Temperatures not documented and a large box of cookie dough, open to air. b) Pantry During the resident panty tour on 3/11/25 at 1:12 PM found the drawer was dirty, littered with sugar, salt, and pepper. The upper cabinet had a box of 12 packs of oatmeal expired in April 2024. During an interview on 03/11/25 at 1:20 AM the Infection Preventionist verified that the oatmeal was expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to handle, store, process, or transport linens and laundry in a hygienically clean manner, or clean the laundry machine filters. The facility also failed to follow infection control protocols when handling food trays, and trash. In addition, the facility failed to provide residents with hand hygiene before meals. These failed practices allowed for the potential spread of infection throughout the facility. Facility Census: 59 Findings Include: 1) Handling and storage of clean linen (100 Wing, 300 Wing and 400 Wing): a. During an observation of the 100 Wing linen cart on March 10, 2025, at approximately 7:30 AM, Account Manager (AM) #67 was seen replenishing wall boxes with trash bags. While doing this, she pushed a linen cart out of the way with her foot, causing clean linen from the lower rack of the cart to spill onto the floor. AM #67 was observed picking up the spilled linen and placing it back in the cart. However, RN #62 confirmed that the linen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
b) Resident #58 On 03/10/2025 at 11:03 AM, It was observed Resident #58 in his wheelchair rolling down the hall with his catheter bag in his lap. The catheter bag did not have a bag cover. In an interview with Resident #58, on 03/10/2025 at 11:05 AM, he stated he has never been offered a cover for his catheter bag and would like to have one. In an interview with RN #25 on 03/10/2025, at approximately 11:10 AM, he acknowledged Resident # 58 did not have a cover for his catheter bag. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to uphold the residents' right to be treated with dignity and respect by leaving urinary catheter bags uncovered and prominently displayed. Resident Identifiers: Residents #28 and #58. Facility Census: 59. Findings Include: a) Resident #28 On 03/10/25, at approximately 1:35 PM, Resident #28 was observed in bed. The resident's catheter bag, which was uncovered and half full of urine, was seen dangling off the foot of the bed in plain view of anyone passing by. At approximately 1:37 PM on 03/10/25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #38 confirmed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents had the opportunity to exercise autonomy over important aspects of her life such as choice regarding waking time and morning care. Resident Identifier: Residents #50 and #52 Facility Census: 59. Findings Include: a) Resident #52 During an interview with Resident #52, on 03/10/25, at 1:51 PM, she expressed her preference for waking up early and having her bed made and morning care completed before breakfast. She noted that she does not receive morning care until after 10:00 AM. A family member present during the interview stated that they have raised this issue with the nursing staff multiple times, but no action has been taken. The resident also mentioned that her roommate receives morning care around 7:45 AM each day, while she does not receive assistance until much later. Observations on 03/11/25 revealed that AM care was provided to Resident #52 at approximately 10:20 AM. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/10/25, at 10:35 AM, the DON confirmed that the resident has the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0577 — isolatedAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility failed to post in a place readily accessible to residents, and family members and legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility. Random opportunity for discovery. Census 59 Findings included: a) 03/17/25 4:50 PM first observation: A sign located at the receptionist window in the lobby stated that survey results are located on the shelf under the television. However, the state survey results were not located on the book shelf nor anywhere else in the lobby during this observation. b) 03/18/25 11:25 AM second observation: The state survey results were not located on the bookshelf nor anywhere else in the lobby during this observation. c) In an interview with the Administrator 03/18/25 at 11:30 AM she did not find the survey book on the bookshelf and went to locate it. She came back and stated she found it in the business office.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to secure and protect residents' personal and medical information. Specifically, private information was not safeguarded and was found in a clear acrylic wall file located in the residents' hallway. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 59. Findings Include: On 03/18/25 at approximately 8:50 AM, a random opportunity for discovery found multiple documents with resident's identifiable health information in an acrylic wall file holder mounted on the wall outside the nursing office on the 300 wing of the facility. A review of the documents on 03/18/25 at 9:15 AM revealed the following: a) Resident names, Room numbers, Diagnoses, Code status, and Vital signs for twenty-nine (29) residents. b) Prescription information for Resident #221. A new resident admitted on [DATE]. c) Medication listings for thirty-one (31) residents d) A controlled drug administration record for Resident #52. The documents also included Shift Change Controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that all written grievance decisions included the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #218. Facility census: 59. a) Resident #218: On 03/17/25 at 03:45 PM, during record review, a grievance form dated 4/10/2024 was not completed for Resident #218. Per the facility's Grievance Policy, the grievance officer will oversee grievances through conclusion leading any necessary investigations by the facility, issuing written decisions to the patient, and coordinating with state and federal agencies. In an interview with the Administrator on 3/17/25, at 2:44 PM, she acknowledged the grievance form for Resident #218 was not completed nor logged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, electronic medical record and Operation Policy the facility failed to follow written policy, thorough investigating and reporting to proper agencies of injury of unknow origin and neglect. This is true of two (2) of six (6) residents reviewed for abuse. Resident identifier: #55 and #36. Facility census: 61. Findings include: a) Resident #55 An observation and interview with Resident #55 on 03/10/25 at 8:49 AM revealed a large bruise on her left upper arm. She stated that she did not know where she got it. During an interview on 03/10/25 at 9:01 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was unaware of the bruise on Resident #55's left upper arm. She continued to state that she would get the bruise check. During an interview on 03/17/25 2:50 PM the DON stated that she had the Nurse Practitioners (NP) assess Resident #55's left upper arm. A record review revealed the Nurse Practitioners skin assessment on 03/11/25: Skin: Old bruises on her hands that were present when she arrived, likely due to previous IV insertion sites. She appears to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and operation policy, the facility failed to report alleged violation related to, neglect, or abuse, and report the results of all investigation to the proper authorities within prescribe time frames. This is true for two (2) of six (6) allegations of abuse. Resident identifier: #55 and #36. Facility census: 61. Findings include: a) Resident #55 An observation and interview with Resident #55 on 03/10/25 at 8:49 AM revealed a large bruise on her left upper arm. She stated that she did not know where she got it. During an interview on 03/10/25 at 9:01 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was unaware of the bruise on Resident #55's left upper arm. She continued to state that she would get the bruise check. During an interview on 03/17/25 2:50 PM the DON stated that she had the Nurse Practitioners (NP) assess Resident #55's left upper arm. A record review revealed the Nurse Practitioners skin assessment on 03/11/25: Skin: Old bruises on her hands that were present when she arrived, likely due to previous IV insertion sites. She appears to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and operation policy, the facility failed to take actions to investigate a large bruise of unknow origin and neglect. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier #55. Facility Census 61. Findings include: a) Resident #55: An observation and interview with Resident #55 on 03/10/25 at 8:49 AM revealed a large bruise on her left upper arm. The resident stated that she did not know where she got it. During an interview on 03/10/25, at 9:01 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was unaware of the bruise on Resident #55's left upper arm. She continued to state that she would get the bruise checked. During an interview on 03/17/25, at 2:50 PM, the DON stated that she had the Nurse Practitioners (NP) assess Resident #55's left upper arm. A record review revealed the Nurse Practitioners skin assessment on 03/11/25: Skin: Old bruises on her hands that were present when she arrived, likely due to previous IV insertion sites. She appears to have new bruising on her upper arms of unknown cause. She denies pain. Transcribed as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to accurately document resident's discharge status in Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS). The assessment must represent an accurate picture of the resident's status during the observation period of the MDS. Resident #62. Findings included: a) Resident #62: An observation on 03/12/24, at 10:58 AM, revealed MDS dated [DATE], Section A, Question A2105 Discharge Status. entered code 4 (four) Short-term General hospital (acute hospital, IPPS). An observation on 03/12/25, of a Social Services Note dated 12/23/24, at 4:40PM, stated Resident's daughter arrived at facility this date and states that she is picking resident up to take him home. She reports that she has arranged for home health services and medical appointment with VA Medical Center. During an interview with MDS Coordinator #54 on 03/12/25, at approximately 12:55 PM, in regards to MDS question A2105 Discharge Status 04.Short-Term General Hospital (acute hospital, IPPS) dated 12/24/24, MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, resident, staff interview. The facility failed to assist dependent Residents with activities of daily living (ADL's) in accordance with the Residents assessed needs for care. This is true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident Identifiers: #50. Facility census: 61. Findings Included: a) Resident #50 showers During an interview and observation on 03/10/25 at 10:20 AM Resident #50 stated that she doesn't get her showers or baths as ordered or her preference. She continued to say that I don't like not having a shower when I get visitors. Her hair was observed to be very oily during this interview. A review of Resident #50's ADL documentation found that there was only one (1) shower on 02/21/25 and two bed baths noted on 02/11/25 and 02/14/25 given in 30 days. During an Interview on 03/11/25, at 12:25AM, the Administrator verified there was no documentation that Resident #50 received showers as scheduled.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement protocols ensuring that staff conducted incontinence assessments for dependent residents and provided incontinence care at the required intervals throughout the day. Resident Identifier: #51. Facility Census: 59. Findings Include: a) Resident #51 Observation, interview and record review revealed that a dependent resident was not being provided incontinence care in a timely manner. During an interview on 03/10/25, at approximately 1:15 PM, the Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) for Resident #51 stated that she visits the resident every day. She mentioned that Resident #51 is incontinent and noted that the facility staff has failed to assess the resident for incontinence at regular intervals. Additionally, she indicated that the resident experiences fecal incontinence, and she often has to clean him up upon her arrival at the facility. Record review revealed documentation that the resident was assessed for incontinence regularly. On 03/12/25, at approximately 11:25 AM, Nursing Assistant (NA) #17, who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order regarding a prescription for oxygen. Resident Identifier: #22. Facility Census: 59 Findings Include: a) Resident #22 During an interview with Resident #22 on 03/10/25, at approximately 9:43 AM, the resident indicated that she was somewhat hard of hearing. She responded to questions about her care, and expressed that she was happy and content with the facility. The resident was observed to be on oxygen therapy. Inspection of the resident's oxygen concentrator revealed that it was set to deliver 4 liters per minute. During record review performed on 03/10/25 at 1:15 PM a physicians order was revealed The physicians order prescribed oxygen at 2 liters per minute by nasal cannula for Resident #22 Ongoing observation of Resident #22 on 03/1025 at 12:55 PM revealed that the oxygen concentrator was still set at 4 liters per minute. Another observation on 03/10/25 at 2:20 PM revealed that the oxygen was still unchanged and set at 4 liters per minute. A follow-up observation on 03/11/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to update nurse staff postings to reflect actual hours worked. This is true for five of five days reviewed. Findings included: Review of staff posting on 03/12/25 at 01:57 PM revealed the following Daily Nurse Staffing Forms were not updated to actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses, and certified nurse aides: 05/28/24 12/18/24 10/21/24 07/05/24 03/05/25 Interview with Consulting Administrator on 03/12/25 at approximately 2:30 PM who acknowledged the Daily Staff Postings were not edited to reflect actual hours worked by direct care staff.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility was unable to provide evidence that the attending physician reviewed any irregularities identified by the pharmacist and either accepted or rejected the recommendations. This was true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed under the Unnecessary Medications pathway in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #24 and #2. Facility census: 59. Findings include: a) Resident #24: On 03/12/25 10:51 AM During record review: -The Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review for 12/15/24 had not been completed. - The Physician did not respond to the BP Recommendations dated 1/18/20 for taking resident's BP daily. 01/18/2025 Recomendation: - 1/18/2025 Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MMR) -Metoprolol directions indicate to hold if SBP < 110 please either add daily BP documentation or remove from directions. If hold direction removed from metoprolol, suggest checking blood pressure and pulse weekly (taking metoprolol, losartan, amlodipine) DON Interview: In an interview with DON on 03/17/2025 at 2:42PM, she stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor, and implement interventions to meet the resident's preferences, as related to the resident's request to have cereal and oatmeal for breakfast. Resident Identifier #52. Facility Census:59. Findings Include: a) Resident #52 During an interview on 03/10/25 at 1:51 PM, resident stated that she had requested cereal and milk for breakfast, but had not received it. Resident's family member stated that she had spoken to the kitchen staff multiple times, and her mother had still not received any cereal with her breakfast. Resident's daughter stated that she would highlight the cereal on her mother's breakfast menu for the next day. On 03/11/25, at approximately 9:15 AM, when interviewed, Resident #52 stated that no cereal had been served to her. Resident #52's family member produced a picture of a bowl of oatmeal on the resident's bedside table. During an interview with Consulting Administrator (CA) #100 at 10:15 AM, CA #100 was notified that the resident had not received her requested cold cereal and milk. CA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident council interview and staff interview the Facility failed to provide evidence that snacks were offered to resident at bedtime. Resident identifiers #47, #30, #2, #46, #49 Findings included: a) Residents #47, #30, #2, #46, #49: On 03/11/25 a Resident council meeting was held at 11:45 AM and the following was discussed: Resident #47 reported that staff do not ask if residents want an evening snack. She stated they (staff) will get one if they are asked for but its usually a gram cracker. She reported that she can remember being offered evening snacks on one occasion and was excited to get the treat. Council members agreed that staff do not offer snacks in the evening but they will bring you an oatmeal cake if you ask for one. Cognitively Intact attendees: Resident #47 had a BIMS of 14- lacked capacity to make medical decisions. Resident #30 had a BIMS of 15- had capacity to make medical decisions. Resident #2 had a BIMS of 15- had capacity to make medical decisions. Resident #46 had a BIMS of 15-had capacity to make medical decisions. Resident #49 had a BIMS of 14-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to store garbage and refuse in a proper manner. The dumpster area was polluted with garbage and used medical supplies. This has the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Garbage dumpster area An observation on 03/12/25, at 2:57 PM, found the dumpster lids open, and the area around the dumpster was polluted with garbage and used medical supplies. On 03/12/25, at 3:16 PM, during an Interview the Maintenance Director verified the trash / medical supplies on the ground around the dumpster.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-03 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespreadNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all staff had thorough background checks. The state of [NAME] Virginia uses the [NAME] Virginia CARES (Clearance for Access: Registry & Employment Screening) system to determine eligibility to work in a nursing home. Nurse Aide (NA) #17 did not have WV CARES determination on file and had been working at the facility. This was true for one (1) out of five (5) staff reviewed for Nurse Aides reviewed. Staff Identifier: NA #17. Facility census: 58. a) Nurse Aide # 17 A review of the employee file for Nurse Aide (NA) #17 found they do not have a WV Cares eligibility letter on file. NA #17's hire date was 05/08/06. WV CARES became required for all new and current employees beginning in the year 2016. On 04/02/24 at 2:32 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated NA #17 had worked at this facility for twenty some years and is now out for an illness. However, he agreed she was working prior to getting ill and there were not any documents to show a WV Cares eligibility screening was completed. At the end of this survey no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was available 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) Eight (8) consecutive hours of RN coverage. A review of the facility staff postings revealed that on 11/19/23 and 12/03/23 no Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled to work on the above dates. A review of timecards for all staff working on 11/19/23 and 12/03/24 found no RN coverage. During an interview, on 04/03/24 at 8:05 AM, the Director of Nursing reviewed the timecards and stated they were very short staffed.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to retain the original staff postings for a minimum of 18 months as required. This had the potential to affect all residents currently residing at the facility. Facility census 58. Findings include: a) Staff postings On 03/26/24 at 3:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked for the original Staff Posting Sheets for the first quarter of 2024. On 03/27/24 at 9:10 AM, the DON stated the facility is unable to provide the original Staff Posting Sheets because they cannot find them.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to contain waste properly in the dumpster. This had the practice affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 58. Findings included: a) On three different observation occasions there was found to be trash around the dumpster and in the community yard between the dumpster and the city road. This consisted of used gloves, masks, and cigarette packages as well as cigarette butts. On 03/25/24 at 1:05 PM there were used gloves, masks, and cigarette packages as well as cigarette butts around the dumpster and behind the dumpster from the fence to the city road. On 03/26/24 at 11:10 AM a second observation of the dumpster found used gloves, masks, and cigarette packages as well as cigarette butts around the dumpster and behind the dumpster from the fence to the city road. On 03/27/24 at 10:45 AM the third observation, with the Administrator, of the dumpster area found trash around the dumpster. Used gloves, masks, cigarette packages and cigarette butts were observed. These items were also found from the fence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through the support of resident choices related to showers. This was true for seven (7) out of seven (7) residents reviewed under choices in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #26, #4, #3, #11, #13, #36, and #1. Facility census: 58. Findings include: a) Resident #26 During an interview with Resident #26 on 3/25/24 at 3:35 PM, the resident reported his showers are every other week, but he would like to have them more often. He reports having told staff this several times. Review of Resident #26's admission minimum data set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/21/23 revealed the resident needs partial assistance from staff for his showers. Review of Resident 26's bathing tasks, with a look back period of thirty days revealed the resident had a shower only once on 03/05/24. During an interview on 04/03/24 at approximately 1:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the shower schedules had been an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident specific care plan. This was true for five (5) of 19 sampled residents. Resident Identifiers: #19, #24, #50, and #33 Facility Census: #58. Findings include: a) Resident #19 (1) fluid restriction On 03/26/24 at 12:40 PM, observation was made of Resident #19 having her lunch meal delivered to her room. She had a sixteen (16) ounce cup of water on her over the bed table. Provided to her from the hydration cart was an additional eight (8) ounces of coffee and eight (8) ounces (oz) of fruit punch. Review of her meal ticket provided with this meal shows Resident #19 is on a fluid restriction of eight (8) ounces of fluid sugar free per meal hydration.' Resident #19 had the following orders: Order Summary: Renal diet Regular Texture Diet Condiments Order Summary: Fluid Restriction Reduce fluid intake to 1000 ml total/24 hours. Breakfast- 8 oz Lunch- 8 oz Dinner- 8 oz Nursing Med Pass- 240 ml with meals for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. Neuro checks were not completed after falls. A critical oxygen level was not reported to the physician. This was found for seven (7) of nineteen residents reviewed. Resident identifiers: #110, #10, #1, #56, #4,#12, and #27. Facility census: 58. Findings included: Facility Policy,Medication Administration revision date: 01/01/22. -Facility should commence medication administration within sixty (60) minutes before the designated times of administration and should be completed by sixty (60) minutes after the designated times of administration. a) Resident #110 Resident #110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following pertinent diagnosis: -Amputation of gangrene foot. -Diabetic -Vascular disease During a review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed the following: -Gabapentin 100 milligram (mg) give one (1) capsule three (3) times a day. This was ordered on 03/24/24 at 2:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff Interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from accident hazards over which it had control. One (1) medication (med) cart was left unlocked and unattended, allowing access to medications by residents and unauthorized persons. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This deficient practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 58. Findings included: a) Unlocked Med Cart On 03/27/24 at 12:20 PM, the Surveyor observed that a med cart on the 400 Hall was unlocked and unattended. The Surveyor remained with the unlocked cart until the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed medications were in the med cart and that the cart should be locked when unattended. The DON immediately locked the cart. LPN #34 then approached Surveyor and questioned, Was the cart unlocked? I've mentioned in the past that the lock on this cart doesn't always work. You can push it in and think it's locked, but it's not. She then went on to demonstrate what she meant. Review of the facility policy, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor for side effects and behaviors associated with an antianxiety (anxiolytic) and antidepressant medication. Resident identifiers: #50, #24 and #10. Facility Census: #58 Findings included: a) Resident #50 On 03/27/24 at 2:15 PM, a record review found Resident #50 had the following medical diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease Dementia with behavior disturbance Anxiety disorder There was a current physician order for buspirone HCL oral tablet five (5) milligrams (mg) (an anxiolytic medication). Give five (5) mg by mouth three times a day for anxiety and restlessness. Observe for side effects: sedation, morning hangover, ataxia, nausea. Record review of the Medication Administration Record and progress notes shows there is no documentation of Resident #50's behaviors or monitoring of side effects as listed above in the physician's order. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing (DON)on 03/27/24 at 02:50 PM. b) Resident #24 On 03/27/24 at 10:50 AM, a record review found Resident #24 had the following diagnosis:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident council meeting, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a substantial/nourishing snack was provided between the evening meal and breakfast. This had the ability to affect all residents who did not have a dietary order to receive an evening snack or the cognitive and/or physical ability to make their way to the nurse's station to request something to eat from the nourishment room. Facility Census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident Council Meeting During the resident council meeting with Surveyor on 03/27/24 at 9:48 AM, the six (6) residents in attendance stated the facility did not offer an evening snack to residents. They went on to say they felt most facility residents would enjoy a bedtime snack. Several residents explained if they were hungry before bedtime, they knew they could make their way to the nurse's station and ask for something. When asked if all residents in the facility knew how to acquire a snack from the nursing staff, resident council members were not sure everyone understood. b) Staff interview On 04/02/24 at 3:08 PM, Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection by not following isolation precautions. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: #15 and Resident #209. Facility census: 58. Findings include: a) Resident #15 On 03/27/24 at 1:05 PM it was observed Resident #15 had gauze and tape around the left front of the wheelchair. This was pointed out to Registered Nurse (RN) #62. RN #62 stated it was on there to protect the residents' leg from rubbing on the wheelchair. It was explained gauze and tape cannot be cleaned. On 03/27/24 at 3:10 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of the above and no further information was provided. b) Resident #209 On 03/27/24 at 1:30 PM, Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) #83 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to treat Resident #7 with respect and dignity and to care for the resident in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of her quality of life. Secondly, the facility failed to provide meals in the dining room to all residents at a table at the same time. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was given the right to vote. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #7 and #11. Facility census: 58 Findings include: a) Resident #7 During a dining room observation on 03/27/24 at 12:00 PM, Resident #7 was observed with an abundant amount of facial hair on her upper lip and chin. The facial hair on her lip had the appearance of a very light moustache. The hairs on her chin measured approximately 1/2 - 3/4. The hair was noticeable when standing approximately five (5) feet away from the resident. Resident #7 was sitting at a table by herself. When the Surveyor approached…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach in Resident #33's room. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #33. Facility census: 58. Findings include: a) Resident #33 On 03/27/24 at 9:45 AM, Resident #33 stated in a resident council meeting he would like for his call light to be either pinned to his clothing or on the blanket beside him on the right side of his body. The Resident explained his stroke had affected the left side of his body and he has poor mobility. Many times, the nursing assistants leave the room without the call light being within his reach. Resident stated the call light is his lifeline to staff since he is not independent with mobility, and it raises his anxiety levels when he has no way to turn his call light on. A random observation, on 04/02/24 at 11:04 AM, found Resident #33's call light was placed on the left side of his bed, looped around the bed rail and had no clasp. The Resident reported it was out of his reach and expressed his concern that he often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident's legal representative after the resident experienced a fall. The facility's failure to notify the resident's representative was true for one (1) of four (4) residents sampled for falls in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #49. Facility census: 58 Findings included: a) Resident #49 A record review, completed on 04/26/24 at 10:00 AM, revealed the following details: -Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -A physician determination of capacity, dated 08/02/23, noted the resident lacked capacity to make medical decisions. -There was Legal Guardianship paperwork, dated 08/26/22, scanned into the medical record which reflected that the [NAME] Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (WV DHHR) had been appointed as a legal guardian for Resident #49. -The guardianship paperwork revealed the WV DHHR would be responsible for all areas of the protected person's (Resident #49's) daily life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's personal privacy was maintained during catheter care. Additionally, three (3) residents personal information was left unattended in the lobby and was accessible to the public and other residents . This was true for one (1) out of one (1) reviewed for catheter care and was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: Resident # 1, #49, #23, and #50. Facility census: 58 Findings include: a) Resident # 1 While observing catheter care on 04/03/24 at 9:52 AM, it was noted Nurse Aide (NA) #50 failed to close the door and the window blinds before providing catheter care. This was reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/03/24 at 9:59 AM and no further information was provided. b) Elopement Binder in Lobby Observation, on 03/27/24 at 9:30 AM, found the facility's elopement binder in the front lobby accessible to any passerby. The elopement binder contained resident pictures and an elopement risk identification form completed for each resident who had been deemed an elopement risk. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to identify a verbal complaint/concern as a grievance, failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances, and to keep the resident informed of progress toward resolution. This was true for one (1) of 19 residents reviewed in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier: #33. Facility census: 58. Findings include: a) Interview with Social Worker During an interview on 04/02/24 at 10:16 AM, the Social Worker stated it was the social services department that was responsible for overseeing the grievance process, including receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusions. It was explained that any resident who verbalized they had missing personal property would be assisted by staff in completing a written grievance form. b) Review of Grievance Policy A review of the Grievance Policy, completed on 04/02/24 at 10:29 AM, revealed: -Upon receipt of the grievance/concern, the grievance/concern form would be initiated by the staff member receiving the concern. -The concern/grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to update Resident #10's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after they were diagnosed with Major depressive disorder during their stay. This was true for one (1) out of two (2) residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). Resident identifier: #10. Facility censuses 58. Findings included: a) Resident #10 A review of the medical record for Resident #10 on 03/25/24 at 3:08 PM, found the most recent PASARR was dated 01/09/2014, and had no mention of Major Depressive disorder. Resident #1 was diagnosed with major depressive disorder on 11/10/14. PASARR had not been completed since Resident #10 was diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder. On 04/03/24 at 8:05 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the PASARR did not have the diagnosis of Major Depressive disorder and a new PASARR should have been completed.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan in a timely manner. This was found for one (1) of nineteen residents reviewed during the long-term care survey process. Resident Identifier: #19 Facility Census: #58. Findings Include: a) Resident #19 On 03/26/24 at 01:23 PM, record review shows Resident #19 received dialysis three (3) times a week. The current order stated: Dialysis days: Monday, Wednesday, Friday. Time for pick up: 05:30. Transport to: (Name of dialysis center) Transport: PT (patient) via stretcher. She was care planned for the same. On 03/27/24 at 08:00 AM, the resident was in her room. When Registered Nurse #44 was asked why the resident did not go to dialysis, she responded, she doesn't go until 10:00 AM now, they changed her times. Further conversation on 03/27/24 at 08:30 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed the order should state, for pick up at 10:00 AM. He states this changed at the beginning of the year. Review of Resident #19's care plan shows the care plan was not revised to reflect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation,record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for dependent residents. Resident #7 had unwanted facial hair. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #7. Facility census:58. Findings included: a) Resident #7 During a dining room observation on 03/27/24 at 12:00 PM, Resident #7 was observed with an abundant amount of facial hair on her upper lip and chin. The facial hair on her lip had the appearance of a very light moustache. The hairs on her chin measured approximately 1/2 - 3/4. The hair was noticeable when standing approximately five (5) feet away from the resident. Resident #7 was sitting at a table by herself. When the Surveyor approached Resident #7 to inquire about the help she received with grooming, the resident stated, Wait. Wait. I am a mind reader! I would love for someone to help me shave all this off!! as she was pointing to her facial hair. The Administrator confirmed the presence of the facial hair on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Resident Identifier: #27 Facility Census: #58 Findings include: a) Resident #27 On 03/27/24 at 10:17 AM record review shows Resident #27 had the following orders for pressure ulcers or preventative orders with missed treatment dates provided. According to the review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for February and March 2024 the following Physicians treatment orders were not completed as ordered. Apply skin prep and protective cream to right heel Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) every shift for pressure injury. Missed orders on 02/06/24 and 02/14/24 evening shifts. Apply skin prep followed by protective cream to left heel Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) every shift for pressure injury and to prevent skin breakdown. Missed orders on 02/06/24 and 02/14/24 evening shifts. Place two pillows under bilateral feet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, the facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to use a sterile technique while providing tracheostomy care for Resident #41 and failed to give a breathing treatment to Resident #4 as ordered. This was found for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for respiratory care. Resident identifiers; #41 and #4. Facility census: 58. Findings included: a) Resident #41 Facility policy, Tracheostomy Care, revision date: 07/15/21. -Open sterile trach kit using aseptic techniques. -Remove sterile drape from trach care kit and spread on bedside table. Do not touch the inner sterile field. -Empty sterile contents of trach care kit onto the sterile drape. During an observation on Tracheostomy care on 04/02/24 at 11:25 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) #44. RN #44 failed to clear and disinfect the bedside table prior to opening the Tracheostomy kit .RN #44 then removed the sterile drape from the kit and placed it on the chest and abdomen of Resident #41. RN #44 continued to remove the contents of the kit onto the bedside table along with personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide ongoing assessments to ensure the overall quality of care the resident received in regards to dialysis treatment. In addition, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for fluid restriction. Resident identifier: #19. Facility Census: #58. Findings included: a-1) Resident #19 - communication between facility and dialysis center On 03/26/24 at 1:23 PM record review showed Resident #19 received dialysis three (3) times a week Review of the Hemodialysis Communication Record for the following post Hemodialysis treatment assessments were not complete or were missing. This post assessment includes access site, blood pressure, temperature, pulse, Arteriovenous fistula (AV) Shunt for bruit and thrill, any post dialysis complications, any new orders from the dialysis center. 02/02/24 incomplete 02/05/24 incomplete 02/07/24 no Hemodialysis Communication Record 02/09/24 incomplete 02/12/24 no Hemodialysis Communication Record 02/14/24 no Hemodialysis Communication Record 02/16/24 incomplete 02/21/24 incomplete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor for side effects and behaviors associated with an antipsychotic medication. Resident identifiers: #50 and #27. Facility Census: #58 Findings included: a) Resident #50 On 03/27/24 at 02:15 PM record review found Resident #50 had the following medical diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease Dementia with behavior disturbance Anxiety disorder There was a current physicians order for an antipsychotic medication: Olanzapine Tablet 2.5 milligrams (MG) Give 2.5 mg by mouth at bedtime every other day for dementia with paranoia. Observe for side effects like sedation, weight gain, dry mouth, blurred vision, tachycardia, Tardive dyskinesia. Record review or the Medication Administration Record and progress notes showed there was no documentation of Resident #50's behaviors or monitoring of side effects as listed above in the physician's order. This was confirmed with the Director of Nursing (DoN) on 03/27/24 at 2:50 PM. b) Resident #27 On 03/27/24 at 11:50 AM, a record review found Resident #27 had the following diagnoses:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge plan for a resident. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents who were reviewed for discharge. Resident identifier: # 17. Facility census: 59. Findings included: a) Resident #17 A review of the discharge record for Resident #17 found the resient was discharged on 08/26/23. A review of the care plan found no discharge plan was completed for this resident In an interview with the Director of Nursing on 09/21/23 at 11:51 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, We missed it and there was no discharge plan on the care plan.
- No harm found · B2026-07-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to ensure proper levels of staff were maintained to provide for the residents' needs. This was discovered during the normal Long Term Survey Process, while meeting with the resident council and has the ability to affect more than a limited number of residents. Census 59. Findings included:a) On 07/14/26 at approximately 10:30 AM during a meeting with the resident council, twelve (12) out of thirteen (13) members in attendance brought up that call light response times are very long. When the group was asked how long they thought the average wait time for a call light to be answered, the response was longer than 45 minutes most days. This was the answer given. This has been an area of note in almost every meeting since the beginning of the year. A second surveyor later confirmed this after overhearing a worker telling a resident, I'm sorry we are short staffed and it's taking so long to get to y'all.In a follow up with the Administrator, they confirmed staffing issues and stated they were working to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-07-15 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing posting was completed accurately for two (2) days throughout the long-term care survey process. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to impact more than an isolated number of residents. Facility census: #59. Findings included:a) Staffing dataAn observation of the facility's posted staffing data on 07/12/26 revealed that the required resident census was not documented for 07/11/26 or 07/12/26.During an interview on 07/12/26 at 11:40 AM Registered Nurse (RN) #69 verified the census was not documented. She stated that she would add the census immediately.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2011 |
| FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GEN OPERATIONS II LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GENESIS OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| GHC HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/02/2015 |
| WHITMAN, ARNOLD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/01/2023 |
| BERG, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/02/2015 |
| BRIDGEFORD, LAURA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| MENDELSON, AVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2024 |
| SUTTON, MATTHEW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/20/2024 |
| MORRIS, DIANE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/12/2026 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2025 |
| ALBAUGH, MIRANDA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $463K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WV
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 515179. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.