No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sistersville Center

201 Wood Street, Sistersville, WV 26175 · For profit - Corporation · 68 certified beds · (304) 652-1032 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$38,255 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2026
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $38,255 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
314 S Wells St · (304) 652-2399 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
615 Wells St · (304) 652-6131 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
701 Chelsea St · (304) 652-2250 · Call to confirm hours
Park
820 Chelsea St · (304) 652-1578 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.1%14.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.6%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.8%7.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.6%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.3%15.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.1%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.4%22.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.9%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.0%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.6%79.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission42.9%22.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.7%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.741.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.661.841.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.1%CMS range 25.4–61.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.4–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
38.8%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 63.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-02)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

68 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from abuse that resulted in mental anguish for Resident #57, #56, #61, and #62. Resident #64 was touching female residents in the breast and vaginal area. The staff felt it was not a big deal if the female residents were not in distress. All sixteen (16) female residents on the dementia unit had the potential to be affected. The facilities lack of action to investigate the sexual abuse allegations placed Residents #57, #56, #61, and #62 at continued risk of sexual abuse for over six (6) months prior to Surveyor intervention. Resident identifiers: #64, #57, #56, #61, #62, #42, #43, #44, #45, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #58, #66. Facility census: 64. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 5:26 PM on 02/13/24. The facility submitted their plan of correction (POC) at 9:00 PM on 02/13/24. The State Agency (SA) approved the facility's POC at 9:10 PM on 02/13/24. The IJ began on 07/31/23 the date of the first incident between Resident #64 and a female…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written Abuse Prohibition policy as it related to identifying investigating and reporting allegations of sexual abuse. The facility also failed to follow procedures to investigate any such allegations and prevent future sexual abuse from happening. The facilities lack of action to identify, investigate, and report the sexual abuse allegations placed sixteen (16) female residents residing on the dementia unit at continued risk of sexual abuse for over six (6) months prior to surveyor intervention. Review of facility records found that there were 16 other female residents on the locked memory care unit where Resident #64 resided and were potential victims of his behavior. Resident identifiers: #64, #57, #56, #61, #62, #42, #43, #44, #45, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #58, #66. Facility census: 64. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 7:13 PM on 02/13/24. The facility submitted their initial abatement plan of correction (POC) at 9:00 PM on 02/13/24. The State Office approved the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving resident sexual abuse were reported, not later than 2 hours of the events / allegations being brought to the facility's attention, to appropriate state agencies as required. Resident #64 was touching female residents in the breast and vaginal area. The staff felt it was not a big deal if the female residents were not in distress. All sixteen (16) female residents on the dementia unit had the potential to be affected. The facilities lack of action to investigate and report the sexual abuse allegations placed the residents on the dementia unit at risk for serious injury or death. The abuse continued over six (6) months prior to surveyor intervention. These were random opportunities for discovery during a complaint survey. Resident identifiers: #57, #56, #61, #62, #64, #42, #43, #44, #45, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #58, #66. Facility census: 64. The facility was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at 5:52 PM on 02/13/24. The facility submitted their initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have evidence of thorough investigations and prevention of further abuse while investigations were in progress. The facility was aware of sexual abuse by a male resident toward female residents. They did not conduct investigations when the abuse occurred. They did work to protect female residents from further sexual abuse after multiple occurrences of sexual abuse were observed. For the one (1) unusual occurrence that was reported there was no five (5) day follow up that contained an appropriate corrective actions. Resident #64 was touching female residents in the breast and vaginal area. The staff felt it was not a big deal if the female residents were not in distress. All sixteen (16) female residents on the dementia unit had the potential to be affected. The facilities lack of action to investigate the sexual abuse allegations placed eleven (11) female residents at continued risk of sexual abuse for over six (6) months prior to Surveyor intervention. Resident identifiers: #64, #57, #56, #61, #62, #42, #43, #44,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2024-02-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility administration failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Administration including the facility administrator and director of nursing (DON) was aware of resident to resident sexual abuse going on in the facility and failed to take appropriate action(s) to protect vulnerable residents. This was a random opportunity for discovery throughout the complaint survey process. The lack of action on the part of the administration created a problem for all seventeen (17) female residents living on the dementia unit. Resident identifiers: 64, #57, #56, #61, #62, #42, #43, #44, #45, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #58, #66. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Abuse Prohibition Policy Review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy revealed the following details: - Sexual Abuse was defined as, a non-consensual sexual contact of any time with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident's received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, physician's orders were not followed for Neurological checks (neuro checks) . This practice affected one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed, during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier #13. Facility census: 60. a) Resident #13 The facility's policy titled Falls Management, with effective date 09/15/01 and revision date 01/15/26, stated any resident who had a fall unwitnessed by staff would be observed for neurological abnormalities by performing neurological checks per policy. The facility's policy titled, Neurological Evaluation, with effective date 03/01/98 and revision date 01/15/26, stated when a resident has an unwitnessed fall, neurological evaluations would be performed every 15 minutes for two (2) hours, then every 30 minutes for two (2) hours, then every hour for four (4) hours, and then every eight (8) hours for at least 72 hours. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and surveyor intervention, the facility failed to provide feeding of meals in a timely manner after serving the trays to residents with no drink or meal assistance. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents in the care area of Resident Rights/Exercise of Rights. Resident Identifiers: Resident #55 and Resident # 57. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident # 55 Review of Resident # 55's records show Regular/Liberalized Puree Thick liquids- Honey with 240 ml of cranberry juice with all meals. On 03/31/26 at 12:39 PM, Resident # 55 was served lunch tray with no drink or utensils. Utensils include large maroon spoon. The meals were sitting, uncovered, in trays for eleven (11) minutes before a staff member came over to check what drinks were needed and to start assisting resident with feeding. At 12:53 PM, Registered Nurse Clinical Lead Staff # 45 was asked if it is common for residents to have to wait to be fed or assisted with dining room meals for over ten minutes to which her reply was, absolutely not! This is not a practice we like to see. b)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to honor resident choices regarding the things that are important in her life in regards to getting out of bed before lunch. This is true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for choices. Resident identifier: #54. Facility census: 60. Findings Included: a) Resident #54 During an interview with Resident #4 on 03/30/26 at 11:32 AM, the resident expressed frustration regarding a delay in assistance with getting out of bed. She stated that she had been waiting for approximately one (1) hour and noted that her aide had previously mentioned they would return with help but had not yet done so. She stated she must get them early or she don't get up in time. During an interview on 03/30/26 at 11:45 AM with Registered Nurse #30 she stated she would get Resident #54's aide to get her out of bed for lunch. An observation at 12:10 PM found Resident #54 still in bed. A second observation at 12:50 PM found Resident #54 still in bed eating lunch. On 03/30/26 at 12:55 PM during an interview, Clinical Lead #62 stated that she would investigate the situation and follow up. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policy regarding the reporting of allegations of potential verbal abuse. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of abuse. Additionally, a random opportunity for discovery showed other allegations of potential verbal abuse had not been reported. Resident Identifier: #7. Facility Census: 60. Findings included: a) Policy Review The facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, with effective date 07/01/13 and revision date 11/14/25, stated allegations involving abuse with no serious bodily injury would be reported immediately but no later than 24 hours after forming the suspicion of abuse. b) Resident #7 On 03/16/26, an allegation of potential verbal abuse was reported to the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification. The incident occurred on 02/13/26 at 7:45 PM. The initial reporting of allegations stated, Resident thought she heard the CNA [certified nursing assistant] calling her a mumbled word that sounded like bitch. Resident told her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report allegations of potential verbal abuse within a timely manner. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the care area of abuse. Additionally, a random opportunity for discovery showed other allegations of potential verbal abuse had not been reported. Resident Identifier: #7. Facility Census: 60. Findings included:a) Policy Review The facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, with effective date 07/01/13 and revision date 11/14/25, stated allegations involving abuse with no serious bodily injury would be reported immediately but no later than 24 hours after forming the suspicion of abuse. b) Resident #7 On 03/16/26, an allegation of potential verbal abuse was reported to the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification. The incident occurred on 02/13/26 at 7:45 PM. The initial reporting of allegations stated, Resident thought she heard the CNA [certified nursing assistant] calling her a mumbled word that sounded like bitch. Resident told her father and he asked the CNA if it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to investigate allegations of potential abuse. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 60. Findings included:c) NA #57 and NA #1esOn 04/01/26, the surveyor asked to review the investigation for the allegation of potential verbal abuse toward Resident #7 that had been reported to the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC) on 03/16/26. The allegation of verbal abuse toward Resident #7 had been investigated and was determined to be unsubstantiated. In the finvestigation file was a typed statement. The statement indicated it was from google.com mail and was sent from an iPhone. However, there was no information regarding the writer of the statement. The statement read as follows: I have worked with [Nurse Aide (NA) #53] in this facility for almost three years. She does come in and do her job, and does not call off ever. Our job is far more than just showing up though. I have seen residents trying to talk to her, and her just walk off. Many residents have told me they know she's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a yearly performance appraisal for direct care staff. This is true for one of five nurse aide performance appraisal's reviewed during this survey. Nurse Aide #52. Facility Census: 60Findings included: a) On 04/01/26 at approximately 4:00 PM, Administrator #47 was asked for Nurse Aide (NA) #52's Performance Appraisal for this year and she reported it is not in the chart. The surveyor asked if they could have the most recent one completed. The performance review delivered to the surveyor was dated 09/16/24. On 4/01/26 at 4:02 PM, a reviewed of Employee Performance Appraisal Form for NA #52 who was hired on 12/14/15 revealed her last performance review was completed on 09/16/24. Review of facility title, HR616 Performance Appraisal states: Managers will meet with their regular full-time, regular part-time, and casual employees at least annually to conduct a performance appraisal or have a performance based conversation. In-service education will be provided based on the outcome of these reviews.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records. This deficient practice had the potential to affect two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for the care area of advance directives. Resident Identifiers: #2 and #13. Facility Census: 60.Findings included:a) Resident #2 Review of Resident #2's medical records showed a Physician's Determination of Capacity form dated [DATE] that indicated the resident had capacity to make her own medical decisions. The medical records also showed a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form dated [DATE]. A POST form is a form a resident or their representative completes to specify end-of-life wishes. Resident #2's POST form indicated the resident wanted to receive cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and full treatments. Resident #2's POST form had not been signed by the resident. The section stating Patient/Patient MPOA [Medical Power of Attorney representative]/surrogate signature (required) was marked with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and surveyor intervention, the facility failed to ensure pre meal hand hygiene was performed on one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of infection prevention and control. Resident Identifier #55. Facility Census: 60. Findings included: a) During a dining room observation on 03/31/26 at 12:30 PM, it was noted that Resident #55 was not provided with pre-meal hand cleansing by staff. This was verified at 12:53 PM with Registered Nurse Clinical Lead staff #45, who confirmed that the hand wash was not performed. Upon review of the Infection Control Policies and Procedures for Patient Hand Hygiene provided by the Nursing Home Administrator, the policy states: Staff should assist patients/residents (hereafter 'patient') with hand hygiene after toileting and before meals as needed.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and observation, the facility to ensure garbage was disposed of properly. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) Dumpsters On 04/01/25 at 9:55 AM, two dumpsters located behind a wooden fence were observed by a state surveyor. Gloves and food as well as cup lids, straws, plastic forks, and boxes laying around both dumpsters. were found. On garbage dumpster #1 both lids were open with lids laid back. Garbage dumpster #2 was open with the lid broken off. On 04/01/25 at 10:00 AM, the Administrator was notified and the state of the dumpsters were confirmed. The Facility Administrator stated, I see what you are saying. Usually the dumpsters are replaced yearly. We will have to call the company and get a new dumpster. Let me call (Name of the Director of Nursing) and let her know. She is my go to person.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 53 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure required members of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) team were present to hold the required quarterly meeting. Facility Census: 65. a) QAPI members On 04/03/25 at 1:10 PM, a review of the sign in sheets for QAPI was completed. The review found the Director of Nursing (DON) position was empty during the dates of 02/19/24 through 04/08/24. There was no one filling in the DON position. Therefore, for the dates of 02/19/24 through 04/08/24, the required members did not attend. On 04/03/25 at 2:30 PM, this time frame was confirmed by the Administrator and the current DON. b) QAPI meetings On 04/03/25 at 2:40 PM, a review of the sign in sheets for QAPI was completed. The review found there were no meetings held in the months of 01/2025, 02/2025 or 03/2025. On 04/03/25 at 3:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed there were no meetings held in 01/2025, 02/2025 or 03/2025.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in a manner and environment that promoted a dignified dining experience for the residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #61, #50, #22, #57, #1, #2, #29. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) On 03/31/25 at 12:55 PM, during the dining observation, resident's were not seated at the same time at tables, the lunch meal did not arrive at the same time for resident's at the same table, six (6) residents were left seated in the center of the dining room while the other resident's were at their tables and served beverages and lunch meals and clothing protectors were placed on residents without asking their preference. At 1:05 PM, Resident #61 tried multiple times to feed Resident #50 from their tray. The state surveyor intervened for staff to re-direct the resident. Resident #50 received the lunch tray at 1:13 PM. Resident #1 was fed at 01:32 PM after the tablemate's lunch had been fed beginning at 1:12 PM. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a change in condition (CIC) for Resident #22's development of a pressure ulcer on the right heel. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #22. Facility Census: 65. Findings Include: a) Resident #22 On 03/31/25 at 2:30 PM, a progress note was reviewed. The progress note dated 03/31/25 at 1:16 PM stated, Resident has a blister to her right heel. NP (Nurse Practitioner) in facility this morning and visited resident. New order for Sure Prep to right heel BID (twice daily). POA (Power of Attorney) notified and in agreement with order. (Typed as written.) Upon further review, no change in condition was found for Resident #22. On 04/01/25 at 2:00 PM, an interview was held with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON confirmed the resident did have a blister to the right heel and no change in condition had been completed.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement or develop comprehensive, person-centered care plans for four (4) of 22 residents. Resident #22's care plan was not implemented regarding a dietary restriction, documenting meal intakes, and for the risk of limited engagement. Resident #31's care plan was not implemented for monitoring of medication side effects and behaviors, pain assessments,and anticoagulation monitoring. The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #57 and #59 to include all diagnoses. Resident Identifiers: #22, #31, #57, #59, #25. and #51. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #22 On 03/31/25 at 12:38 PM, the lunch trays arrived at the dining room on A hall. Resident #22 was sitting with another resident. Nurse Aide (NA) #66 sat Resident #22's food in front of her. The resident was sitting in a geri-chair with a clothing protector on, which was covering up her hands. The resident was tearful throughout the entire dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for Residents #42 fall, #22 dependent for meals, #57 independent for mobility, #4 full code, #23 give fluids when NPO, and #28 hospice when not ordered. These failed practices affected more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #42, #22, #57, #4, #23, and #28. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #42 On [DATE] at approximately 11:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #42. The review found the resident had a fall on [DATE]. An x-ray was completed with no abnormalities found. However, the resident continued to complain with pain upon movement. A computed tomography scan (CT ) was ordered by the facility physician on [DATE]. The CT results were received on [DATE], with the following finding:There are fractures of the left superior and inferior rami, there is also a fracture through the left side of the sacrum. The care plan was reviewed on [DATE] at 11:15 AM. The care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed. medications were administered timely, behaviors, and pain were monitored. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #31, #22, #59, #57, #25, #51 and facility late mdications, #28, #49, #37, #23, #36, #8, #7, $41, #50, #9, #41, #50, #20, #63, #42, #58, #61, #23, #10, #15, #17, #267, and #268. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #31 On 04/01/25 at 9:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #31. The review found the physician's orders were not being followed on the 01/2025 and 02/2025 medication administration records (MARs). The following physician's orders and dates are as follows: --Anticoagulant Medication Monitoring: --01/09/25 day shift --01/13/25 day shift --01/14/25 day shift --01/15/24 day shift --01/16/25 day shift --01/17/25 night shift --01/28/25 day shift --02/11/25 day shift --02/12/25 day shift --Monitor for Behaviors:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have sufficient staffing for the B hall on 03/29/25 and 03/30/25. This failure has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 65. Findings Include: a) B hall residents On 04/03/25 at 11:30 AM, the daily staff postings were reviewed for 03/29/25 and 03/30/25. The review found only two (2) nurses scheduled for both dates; one (1) on the red hall and one (1) on the blue hall. The red hall has 26 beds and the blue hall had a census of 42 residents. No other nurse was scheduled on the blue hall during day shift. The nurse schedule provided had noted a need for day shift on 03/29/25 and 03/30/25. The daily nursing hours per patient day were above the minimum; but, multiple medications were late and multiple treatment orders were incomplete. The acuity of the residents was higher on these days with only one (1) nurse on the blue hall. The following list of late medications for each resident is as follows:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily menus were followed. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) The facility's menu for 03/31/25 was BBQ Pork on Roll, Gelatin Cubes with Whipped Topping and Potato Chips. The BBQ was served on white sandwich bread in the Dining Room and on the hallways per states surveyors' observations. Resident #10, #56 and #26 were on regular diets and all three residents received light bread in place of a roll. Resident #26 demonstrated difficulty picking up and eating the BBQ on light bread. On 04/01/25 at 12:00 PM, the Corporate Dietary Manager #83 confirmed there were no buns/rolls served for the BBQ yesterday. The Corporate Dietary Manager #83 stated, No, we did not. and that the bread truck ran this date. b) The facility's menu for 04/01/25 was Breaded Fish Filet on Roll, Tartar Sauce, Lettuce and Tomato Garnish, Sliced Peaches and Seasoned Potato Wedges. Lettuce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and observation, the facility failed to prepare and serve food at a safe and appetizing temperature. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure stated, All foods will be held at appropriate temperatures, greater than 135 (degrees) F (or as state regulation requires) for hot holding, and less than 41(degrees) F for cold food holding. b) On 04/01/25 at 12:00 PM, the food holding temperature were taken by the Corporate Dietary Manager #83. The following temperatures were obtained: -Holding Temperatures for lunch meal: Lettuce 51.8 - put in freezer Shredded Lettuce 50 - put in freezer Fish - 164.2 Potato Wedges - 183.7 Ground Fish - 181.5 Advanced Mechanical Soft potato wedges - 191.1 (skin off) Meatballs - 195.2 Pureed peaches - 40.3 Rice - 184.2 Pureed rice - 182.1 Pureed fish - 194.7 Peaches - 40.9 Cottage cheese - 39.4 Pureed rice - 172.4 Pureed bread - 170 Fortified pudding - 39.4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly and food preparation equipment was clean. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure stated, All foods are labeled and dated with the name of the product and the date received and use by date once opened. Manufacturer use by dates are used unit opened. Prepared foods are labeled and dated with the name of product, date opened, and use by date. b) On 03/31/25 at 11:25 PM, the Kitchen Investigation was initiated with the Corporate Dietary Manager #83. The following items were observed and confirmed: Frozen chicken breast in an opened ziploc with no dates on the package. Imperial Beef Base was opened and not dated. Celery and Lettuce were opened, uncovered in a box and not dated. Sandwich bread was opened and not dated. The Corporate Dietary Manager #83 asked, Do we need a use by date? c) On 04/01/25 at 10:40 AM, the pantry on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain complete, accurate, and timely medical records. This deficient practice had the potential to affect five (5) of 22 residents reviewed in the long-term care survey sample. Resident Identifiers: #5, #58, #25, #51, and #3. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #5 On 04/01/25 at 8:48 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 was observed administering morning medications to Resident #5. One of the medications administered to the resident was Zyrtec (cetirizine hydrochloride) 10 mg. Review of Resident #11's physicians' orders showed on 03/29/25 the resident was ordered Zyrtec allergy oral tablet (Cetirizine HCl [hydrochloride], give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for sinusitis. The order did not specify the dosage for the medication. On 04/01/25 at 9:50 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #5's Zyrtec didn't have a dosage ordered. She stated the pharmacy only supplies one dosage of Zyrtec to the facility. She stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. These were random opportunities for discovery that had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. The facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) signage was appropriately placed outside Resident #3's room. The facility failed to follow EBP for Resident #7. The facility also failed to provide resident hand hygiene in the dining room. Resident Identifiers: #3 and #7. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #3 The facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, with effective date 01/06/20 and revision date 12/16/24, stated Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) would be implemented for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices. On 04/01/25 at 8:43 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #11) stated where the EBP signage is placed outside the residents' room notifies staff which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited Range of Motion (ROM) was able to reach the call light to call for assistance. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident Identifier: #38. Facility Census: 65 Findings included: a) Resident #38 During the initial interview process, Resident #38 was observed sitting upright in bed and leaning toward the left. The resident attempted to position himself, but was unable. The patient attempted to use the call light, but was unable to reach it. The patient has a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. The state surveyor pushed the call light for the resident at the resident's request. Nurse Aide (NA) #36 answered the call light promptly and asked the Director of Nursing (DON) for assistance with repositioning the resident. b) NA #36 reported the patient will use his call light and stated, When he has it, he usually does. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide a home-like environment during the dining experience. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. FACILITY:FACILITY. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a)The facility's policy and procedure stated, All items are removed from trays and are appropriately placed in front of the resident, packages are opened, and lids are removed. b) On 03/31/25 at 12:55 PM during the facility's dining observation, the staff left a resident's food on their tray when during the lunch meal. An additional resident's tray was left on the table beside the resident's meal while they ate lunch.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation that the appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider upon resident transfer. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of hospitalization. Resident identifier: #66. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #66 Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge and Transfer, with effective date 06/01/96 and revision date 03/24/25, showed for hospital transfers, the following would be sent to the hospital with the resident: - eInteract Nursing Home to Hospital Transfer From (in states where no state specific form is required) - medication list - Advance Directives - Physician's Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form or equivalent The policy and procedure also stated a copy of the eInteract form would be placed in the resident's medical record. Review of Resident #66's progress notes stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) regarding weight loss. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of tube feeding. Resident Identifier: #61. Facility Census: 65. Findings Include: a) Resident #61 On 03/31/25 at 4:51 PM, a record review identified the resident was noted with significant weight loss. The resident's weight on 02/05/25 was 176.8 pounds. The resident's weight on 03/07/25 was 167.2 pounds. This is a significant weight loss of -5.43% in 30 days. A review of the MDS significant change dated 03/10/25 section K regarding weight loss was reviewed on 03/31/25 at 7:00 PM. The MDS stated no or unknown for the question K0300 for loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in 6 months. On 04/02/25 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the MDS was incorrect regarding significant weight loss.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer to the right heel for Resident #22. This was true for one (1) of three (3) records reviewed under the care area of pressure ulcers. Resident Identifier: #22. Facility Census: 65. Findings include: a) Resident #22 On 04/01/25 at 11:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #22. A progress note dated 03/31/25 at 1:41 PM stated, Note: Resident has a blister to her right heel. NP (Nurse Practitioner) in facility this morning and visited resident. New order for Sure Prep to right heel BID (twice daily). POA (Power of Attorney) notified and in agreement with order. On 04/01/25 at 12:19 PM, the Director of Nursing confirmed the resident had developed a pressure ulcer on her right heel.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to transfer oxygen tanks in a safe manner. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 65. Findings Include: a) Oxygen tanks On 04/03/25 at 12:32 PM, an observation of the Maintenance Director carrying four (4) oxygen tanks, with no carrier used. The Maintanence Director had two (2) oxygen tanks in each hand, as he walked around the building the tanks were clanking together. On 04/03/25 at 12:34 PM, an interview was held with the Maintanence Director. the Maintanence Director stated, I know I'm not supposed to carry them this way .I'm trying to help her (referring to the oxygen delivery person) and she is tired. On 04/03/25 at 12:48 PM, the Corporate RN was notified. The Corporate RN shook her head in agreement and confirmed the oxygen tanks should not be transported without a carrier.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal immunizations according to standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for the care area of immunizations. Resident identifier: #59. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #59 Review of the facility's policy titled, Pneumococcal Vaccination, with effective date 05/04/15 and revision date 09/13/24, gave the following instructions: - Obtain patient/representative consent for pneumococcal vaccination - Administer the vaccine Review of Resident #59's electronic health records showed the resident's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) consented on 10/28/24 for the resident to receive the pneumococcal vaccination. Resident #59's Medication Administration Records (MARs) for October and November 2024 contained no documentation the resident received pneumococcal vaccination. On 04/02/25 at 1:55 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility had no documentation Resident #59 had received pneumococcal vaccination after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) allegations of resident-to-resident sexual abuse were reported in a timely fashion and/or to the appropriate state agencies. Resident identifiers: #27 and #23. Facility census: 55. The Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC) Long-Term Care Reporting Requirements guidance, dated December 4, 2019, instructs that OHFLAC and Adult Protective Services (APS) should receive an immediate fax report of allegations within two (2) hours. Findings included: a) Resident #27 and Resident #23 Alleged Victims of Resident-to-Resident Sexual Abuse. A review of facility reportables revealed a facility reportable, dated 03/11/24 that revealed Resident #27 had been an alleged victim of sexual abuse by Resident #24, noting Resident #27 was walking past Resident #24 in the hallway and he grabbed her buttocks. The incident in question was reported to the Office of Health Facility Licensure and Certification (OHFLAC)and the long-term care Ombudsman. Adult Protective Services (APS) did NOT receive a faxed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person -centered care plan for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed in the complaint survey process. The facility failed to address Resident #24's inappropriate sexual behaviors towards residents. Facility identifier: #24. Facility census: 55. Findings included: a.) Resident #24 A review of the comprehensive person -centered care plan for Resident #24 showed a focused area of Resident #24 having a history of exhibiting sexually inappropriate behavior toward staff. Review of the following facility reportables noted inappropriate sexual behaviors toward other residents on the following dates: -03/11/24 -03/21/24 -06/24/24 -08/07/24 During an interview on 10/07/24 at 2:40 PM, the Social Worker confirmed had been exhibiting sexually inappropriate behaviors towards residents and that his care plan should have been updated.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was true for one (1) out of three (3) residents reviewed during a complaint survey process. Resident identifier: #3. Facility census: 55. Findings included: a) 04/15/24 Monthly Medication Regimen Review On 10/08/24 at 9:00 AM, an electronic medical review was completed on Resident #3. When reviewing the pharmacist's monthly medication review it was noted that on 04/15/24 the pharmacist noted Resident #3 receives Divalproex Sodium Dr. The current diagnosis is dementia with behaviors. The recommendation went on to request, Please monitor valproic acid trough concentration on the next convenient lab day, one (1) week after any dosage change, and annually thereafter to rule out toxicity. The electronic medical record revealed that the Nurse Practitioner (NP) had seen the monthly medication regimen review and had agreed to the recommendation on 05/02/24 noting I accept the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that an identified irregularity had been reviewed and what, if any, action was to be taken to address it. This deficient practice was true for one (1) out of three (3) residents reviewed during a complaint survey process. Resident identifier: #3. Facility census: 55. Findings included: a) 04/15/24 Monthly Medication Regimen Review On 10/08/24 at 9:00 AM, an electronic medical review was completed on Resident #3. When reviewing the pharmacist's monthly medication review it was noted that on 04/15/24 the pharmacist noted Resident #3 receives Divalproex Sodium Dr. The current diagnosis is dementia with behaviors. The recommendation went on to request, Please monitor valproic acid trough concentration on the next convenient lab day, one (1) week after any dosage change, and annually thereafter to rule out toxicity. The electronic medical record revealed that the Nurse Practitioner had seen the monthly medication regimen review and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was clean and sanitary. The dementia care unit dining area was unclean, a vitals machine had a brown splattered substance on the bottom, and there was a smeared brown substance on a hand sanitizer dispenser . This failed practice has the potential to effect all residents currently residing in the dementia care unit. Facility Census: 65 Findings Include: a) A tour of the dementia care unit on 04/01/24 beginning at 12:30 PM found the floor in the dining room to be littered with food debris the walls in the dining room had what appeared to be food splatters on several spots on the walls throughout the dining room. By the sink there was food splatters on the wall and several gnats were noted to be positioned on the wall around the food splatters. An additional tour of the dining room on 04/01/24 at 1:58 PM with the Market President found the dining room had been freshly mopped however there was spread red jello on the floor and food particles were still noted on the floor throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing in the facility. Resident identifiers: Resident #26, Resident #15, and Resident #32. Facility Census: 65. Findings Include: a) Observations: During several observations throughout the complaint revisit survey on 04/01/24 to 04/02/24, several group activities were not being conducted as scheduled. The monthly activity calendar for the Blue Hall scheduled events were as follows: -04/01/24 2:00 PM Getting to Know me (3) three residents were in attendance 4:00 PM Meaningful Moments was not conducted -04/02/24 9:30 AM Sensory Group was not conducted 10:30 AM Move and Grove was not conducted 2:00 PM PB&J Day (Peanut Butter and Jelly) The monthly activity calendar for the Red Hall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-02 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional. This had a potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility Census: 65 Findings Include: a) Activity Professional During several observations throughout the complaint revisit survey on 04/01/24 to 04/02/24, several group activities were not being conducted as scheduled. The monthly activity calendar for the Blue Hall scheduled events were as follows: -04/01/24 2:00 PM Getting to Know me (3) three residents were in attendance 4:00 PM Meaningful Moments was not conducted -04/02/24 9:30 AM Sensory Group was not conducted 10:30 AM Move and Grove was not conducted The monthly activity calendar for the Red Hall (Memory Unit) was dated for the month of February. During several observations of the Memory Unit, no activities were being conducted. During an interview on 04/02/24 at 10:43 PM the Recreation Director (RD) stated I am not certified, I started this position in January and I have one week of classes. The RD stated I complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, water temperature measurement and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. The water temperature was found to be 119 degrees and the medication and treatment cart were discovered unlocked and unattended on the night of 04/01/24. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 65. Findings Include: a) Water Temperature An observation on 04/01/24 at 4:00 PM found the hot water in the restroom in the front lobby of the building was too warm to the touch. At 4:45 PM on 04/01/24 a visiting Maintenance Director came to the restroom and obtained the temperature. He stated, This will be in Celsius we will convert it Fahrenheit. The temperature obtained was 48.7 degrees Celsius. This converts to 119.7 degrees Fahrenheit. The state operations manual (SOM) page 340 contained the following in regards to water temperatures: Water Temperature Time Required for a 3rd Degree Burn to Occur 155°F 68°C 1 sec 148°F…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and the ability to prevent or minimize adverse consequences related to medication therapy to the extent possible. The facility failed to act upon the pharmacist medication regimen review reports for comments and recommendations identified for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed during the complaint survey. Resident identifiers: Resident #50, Resident #66, and Resident #67. Census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #50 On 02/13/23 at approximately 4:55 PM during a medical record review of Resident #50's medication regimen reviews, a progress note report was ran to identify any DRR (drug regimen review) reports received from 08/01/23 to 02/13/24. Two (2) drug regimen reports dated 09/25/23 and 10/20/23 were identified with Note: A medication regimen review was performed- see report for comments/ recommendation(s) noted. No reports were provided for 09/25/23 or 10/20/23. During an interview with Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for resident #41 that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Resident identifier: #41. Facility Census 64. a) Resident #41 During a medical record review on 02/14/24 at 10:28 AM, Resident #41 was identified to have a BIMS of 10 and lacked capacity. The baseline care plan, dated 02/02/24, reviewed for Resident #41 identified only one (1) focus that was incomplete, one (1) incomplete goal, and outlined only two (2) interventions for the incomplete focus. - FOCUS: Resident/Patient requires assistance/is dependent for mobility related to: _____. - GOAL: Resident will utilize_____bed rail(s) _____ (indicate one: independently; with assistance) for _____ (indicate: turning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure neurological checks were completed for Resident #66 and Resident #67. This failed practice was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed in the complaint care survey process. Resident identifier: #66, #67. Facility Census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #66 During a record review, on 02/13/24 at 11:07 AM, an unwitnessed fall was identified for Resident #66 on 09/13/23. The unwitnessed fall required neurological checks to be completed. During a review of the 09/13/23 initiated neurological checks form Neurological Evaluation Flow Sheet, under the section to be completed After First 8 Hours Completed Above, Evaluate Every 8 Hours for At Least 64 Additional Hours the following two (2) neurological checks were not completed per the dates and times documented on the form; * 09/14/23 at 1800 * 09/15/23 at 0200 During an interview on 02/13/24 at 3:47 with the DON, the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure they maintained medical records that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized in the resident's medical record. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls during the complaint survey. Resident identifier: #50. Facility Census: 64. a) Resident #50 During a medical record review for Resident #50 on 02/13/24 at 9:56 AM a fall was identified to have happened on 09/02/23 and documented as incident #737 on the fall list that was provided by the facility. During the review of the resident's medical record for 09/02/23 there was no changes in condition documented in her chart, there were no nurses' notes, no care plan updates, or any other pertinent documentation correlated to the documented fall that was referenced as incident #737 for Resident #50 on 09/02/23. On 02/14/24 at 11:37 AM during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #23, the ADON acknowledged that Resident #50 was documented to have fallen on 09/02/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident council meeting, and record review the facility failed to provide residents a confidential way to file a grievance. This failed practice has the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility census: 60. Findings Included: a) Grievances On 04/05/23 at 10:23 AM, during a Resident Council meeting it was revealed there was no confidential way for the residents and/or family members to file a grievance without involving a staff member. On 04/05/23 at 1:45 PM, an observation throughout the facility found no grievance forms available throughout the facility. During an interview on 04/11/23 at 8:56 AM, with the Social Work Director #44 stated the Residents must come to a staff member to file the grievance on the computer. She stated that there are no grievance forms available for residents to file a grievance anonymously. .

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide Notice of Discharge to the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman during a discharge / transfer or the Resident Representative. This was true for three (3) of three (3) Hospitalizations reviewed. Resident Identifier #60, #51 and # 45. Facility Census 60. Findings Included: a) Resident #60 A medical record review on 09/13/22 at 1:27 PM, revealed resident #60 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Subsequent review of Resident #60's medical record showed it did not contain documentation the Notice of Transfer or Discharge was provided to the Resident Representative, or the Ombudsman of the discharges on 03/31/23. During an interview 04/04/23 at 2:30 PM the Social Service Director stated she does not send out discharge and transfer notices to the ombudsman or send a bed hold notice if they are not above 90 % capacity. On 04/04/23 at 2:48 PM Corporate Business Development #79 verified, the ombudsman should have been notified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence the resident and/or the resident's representative was provided a written Bed Hold Notice for a hospital transfer. This was true for three (3) of three (3) residents reviewed for hospitalizations during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #51, #45, and #60. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) #60 A medical record review on 09/13/22 at 1:27 PM revealed resident #60 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Subsequent review of resident #60's medical record showed it did not contain documentation that the resident / resident's representative was provided a written Bed Hold Notice for a hospital transfer of the discharges on 03/31/23. During an interview 04/04/23 at 2:30 PM the Social Service Director, stated she does not send a bed hold notice if they are not above 90 % capacity. On 04/04/23 at 2:48 PM Corporate Business Development #79 verified both a bed hold policy should have been sent with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for residents with wounds. In addition, the facility failed to include in the care plan the side effects of psychotropic medications which staff should watch for. This was found for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, one (1) of two (2) reviewed for pressure ulcers and one (1) of one (1) reviewed for wounds. Resident identifiers: #23, #17 and #43. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #23 Review of the medical record on 04/03/23, revealed R#23 developed an in house pressure ulcer on his coccyx on 02/15/22. The skin and wound evaluation forms dated 11/11/22 states there is a Stage 2 pressure ulcer with partial thickness skin loss, exposed dermis, and 80% epithelial tissue in the wound on the sacrum. The medical record lacks any weekly wound assessments until surveyor intervention on 04/03/23. A wound assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident #38's antibiotics were not given as ordered, Resident #17's wound changes were not documented, Vancomycin trough levels were not drawn correctly causing a resident to miss his antibiotic and a resident was allowed to self administer a medication without a physician's order. These findings are true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for wounds and one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for infections. The remainder were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifiers: #38, #63, #17 and #45. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #38 On 04/04/23 at 3:39 PM, a medical record review displayed the following physician order with a start date of 02/10/23, Cefdinir Capsule 300 MG Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for right pleural effusion for 7 Days. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aides (NA) were able to demonstrate competencies on an annual basis. This was true for four (4) of five (5) nurse aides reviewed for staffing during the Long-Term Survey Process (LTCSP). Staff Identifiers: Nurse Aide (NA) #50,#35, #42, and #52. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Staff Competencies A facility records review revealed NA #50, NA #35, NA #42, and NA #52 did not receive their 12-month Competency review. During an interview on 04/06/23 at 2:51 PM the Corporate Administrator confirmed there were no annual competency / skills check completed for NA #50, NA #35, NA #42, and NA #52. He stated the NA evaluations were something the facility was working on getting completed. .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete yearly performance evaluation for all Nurse Aides (NA). This was true for five (5) of five (5) nurse aides reviewed for staffing during the Long-Term Survey Process (LTCSP). Employee Identifiers: Nurse Aide (NA) #50, #35, #42, #2, amd NA #52. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Facility NA's Annual Evaluations A facility records review revealed NA #50, NA #35, NA #42, NA #2, and NA #52 did not receive their 12-month evaluation. During an interview on 04/06/23 at 2:51 PM the Corporate Administrator confirmed there were no annual evaluations completed for NA #50, NA #35, NA #42, NA #2, and NA #52. He stated NA evaluations were something the facility was working on getting completed. .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staff posting was completed accurately for three (3) days throughout the long-term care survey process. This was a random opportunity for discovery and has the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. Facility census: #60. Findings included: a) Nurse Staff Posting An observation on 04/03/23, 04/04/23, and 04/05/23 of the facility posted staffing data, found the required Resident census was not documented. During an interview on 04/06/23 at 10:08 AM the Administrator verified the census was not documented. She stated she would add the census now. .

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were available to be administered as ordered and staff failed to document the administration of controlled substances in the narcotic drug count book at the time of disposition. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents and one (1) of two (2) nurses observed during medication administration. Resident identifiers: #15, #18, and #37. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #15 A medication administration observation was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) #76 on 04/04/23 at 9:10 AM. RN #76 reported, R#15's Dorzolamide HCL eye drops (for glaucoma) were not available for administration. A medical record review on 04/05/23 confirmed R#15 missed one of two daily prescribed doses of Dorzolamide HCL eye drops. The nurse documented the medication was not available. b) Narcotic Administration Medication observations with RN #76 on 04/04/23, revealed the following: --At 8:44 AM RN #76 administered Gabapentin 400 milligrams (mg) (a Schedule V controlled substance)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to monthly drug regimen reviews. This was true for four (4) of five (5) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier #1, #51, #43 and #36. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #1 A medical record review for Resident #1 revealed the following monthly drug regimen reviews unsigned or responded to by the physician. --09/28/22 Recommendation to initate Senna 8.2 MG two tablets once daily at bed time due to opioid analgesic use. --09/28/22 Recommendation to reevaluate the three or more Central Nervous System (CNS) depressants. --03/13/23 Recommendation clarify the as needed analgesic order to include Pain, Site, and sequence. -03/13/23 Recommendation potential drug -drug interaction -03/28/23 Recommendation to initate Senna 8.2 MG. During an interview on 04/11/23 at 11:02 AM Corporate Administrator #77 verified the physician or the DON did not sign all recommendations or follow up timely. b) Resident #51 A medical record review for Resident #51 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor residents for side effects of psychotropic medications. This is true for three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifiers: #43, #36, #51. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #43 Review of the medical record on 04/11/23, revealed R#43's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with agitation, anxiety and wandering. Her current medications include: --Clonazepam (benzodiazepine used for panic disorders and mania) 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day for restlessness, agitation, repetitive chatter and cursing --Risperidone (atypical antipsychotic) 1 mg twice a day for dementia with behavioral disturbance pacing, aggression, agitation, and repetitive chatter --Trazodone hydrochloride (antidepressant) 75 mg at bedtime for depression The pharmacist's monthly medication regimen review (MMR) dated 01/23/23, notes R#43 receives Risperdal which may cause involuntary movements including tardive dyskinesia. An Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide food services in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated, domed lids were visibly stained / whitened with what the Food Service Director identified as lime / calcium buildup, a ceiling vent was covered in dust, and various repairs were needed. This practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Tour of the Kitchen and the Nourishment Room on the Blue Hall. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 04/03/23 at 10:10 AM with the Food Service Director, the following issues were identified: -There were two (2) two-pound clear bags of what was identified as [NAME] Crispy cereal that was unlabeled. There was also a third bag of what was identified as [NAME] Crispy cereal that was unlabeled and with approximately 1/4 of the bag remaining. The Food Service Director acknowledged the dietary staff failed to follow protocol when they did not label the food. -One (1) of four (4) ceiling vents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director attended quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee Meetings (QAPI). This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently residing in the facility. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) QAPI meetings A facility record review on 04/05/23 at 10:21 AM of QAPI committee meeting sign-in sheet revealed the Medical Director did not attend any meetings from 06/2022 until 03/28/23. During an Interview on 04/05/23 at 10:41 AM the Administrator verified the Medical Director did not attend quarterly QAPI meetings as required. .

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff failed to perform adequate hand hygiene and used their thumb nail to open pill blisters during medication pass. Gloves were not changed timely during wound care. Bed pans were not covered and labeled. A food cart was in disrepair and a resident consumed the remainder of another resident's lunch. This is true for one (1) of two (2) nurses observed during medication administration, one (1) of one (1) observed for wound care and one (1) of three (3) food carts. The remainder were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifier: #18, #15, #35, #23, and #11. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident #35 On 04/03/23 at 12:04 PM, Resident #35 finished eating his meal and stood up in the dining room. He walked over to the sink and washed his hands. When finished, he sat back down at a different table. He sat in Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care to residents in a manner that promoted the right to a dignified existence and failed to protect a residents privacy during care. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident identifier: #43 and #23. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #43 On 04/03/23 at 11:50 AM, Resident #43 was observed asleep in the television room/day room of the memory care unit. Readily visible was an uncovered urinary catheter leg bag hanging below Resident's left pants leg. The urinary catheter bag had no covering, and it was instantly noticeable the bag was approximately 1/3 full of urine. On 04/03/23 at 12:00 PM, Resident #43 was escorted into the dining room by staff for the lunch time meal. Resident #43 was seated in the dining room with approximately 15 other residents. During an interview on 04/03/23 at 12:24 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #78 agreed the noticeably visible urinary catheter bag should have been identified as a dignity issue and addressed prior to them being escorted into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report incidents resulting in serious bodily injury in a timely manner to the appropriate state agencies. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls and one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for accidents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #51 and #11. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident #51 A record review, completed on 04/05/23 at 9:30 AM, revealed the following details: -Resident #51 experienced a fall on 01/16/23 and was sent to the hospital. -A General nursing note, on 01/17/23 at 8:20 AM, noted Patient returned from hospital with 12 sutures to wound to scalp. -The facility's reportables log did not reflect the incident had been reported to the appropriate state agencies. During an interview on 04/05/23 at 10:38 AM, Social Worker #44 stated the fall resulting in 12 sutures to Resident #51's scalp had not been reported as a fall with serious bodily injury. Social Worker #44 explained the facility had been using different guidelines at that time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-11 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The comprehensive assessment does not identify Resident #23's pressure ulcer. This is true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident identifier: #23. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Resident (R) #23 Review of the medical record on 04/03/23, revealed R#23 developed an in house acquired pressure ulcer on his coccyx on 02/15/22. The skin and wound evaluation forms dated 11/11/22 states there is a Stage 2 pressure ulcer with partial thickness skin loss, exposed dermis, and 80% epithelial tissue in the wound on the sacrum. The medical record lacks weekly wound assessments until surveyor intervention on 04/03/23. A wound assessment dated [DATE] notes the Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the sacrum remains. The comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to accurately complete the significant change comprehensive assessment for a resident with a pressure ulcer. This is true for one (1) of two (2) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident identifiers: 23. Facility census: 60. Findings include: a) Review of the medical record on 04/03/23, revealed R#23 developed an in house acquired pressure ulcer on his coccyx on 02/15/22. The skin and wound evaluation forms dated 11/11/22 states there is a Stage 2 pressure ulcer with partial thickness skin loss, exposed dermis, and 80% epithelial tissue in the wound on the sacrum. The medical record lacks weekly wound assessments until surveyor intervention on 04/03/23. A wound assessment dated [DATE] notes the Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the sacrum remains. The quarterly minimum data set assessments (MDS) with assessment reference dates (ARD) of 09/13/22 and 12/08/22 are coded incorrectly under section M0210 and fail to identify R#23's pressure ulcer.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update Resident #55's care plan to reflect a change in nutritional status. This is true for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for the care area of nutrition. Resident identifier: #55. Facility census: 60. Findings included: a) Resident (R) #55 A review of the medical record on 04/11/23 revealed an active diagnosis of Adult Failure to Thrive (AFTT) on R#55's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/10/23. R#55's last weight was 134.5 pounds. The care plan identifies the diagnosis of AFTT, but was not updated to reflect this change. The nutritional Focus states Resident has low risk for decline in nutritional status with weight loss. The goals include meal consumption of greater than 75% of three (3) meals a day and maintain a weight of 150 to 160 pounds. The care plan lacks measurable goals and intervention for R#55's AFTT diagnosis. On 04/11/23 at 9:25 AM, R#55's record was reviewed with Registered Nurse Consultant #83 and the Senior Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, and staff interview the facility failed to assess pressure ulcers weekly to promote the healing of pressure areas. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for pressure areas. Resident identifiers #46 and #23. Facility census 60. Findings Included: a) Resident #46 A medical record review for Resident #46 revealed the following physician orders: -- Apply HYDRA Guard two times a day and as needed to sacrum to maintain skin integrity every day and night shift for to maintain skin integrity. -- Wash coccyx/buttocks with wound wash, pat dry. Apply foam dressing. Change every other day and as needed as soiled every night shift every two 2 day(s) for wound healing. -- Apply skin prep to bilateral heels and ensure that heels are offloaded. Monitor skin for any changes to skin integrity. Continued review of Resident #46's medical record found the following Care plan: Focus: Resident #46 is at risk for skin breakdown related to impaired cognition, impaired mobility, incontinence,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was afforded the amount of supervision required to prevent accidents during the lunch time hour. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls in the Long-Term Care Survey process. Resident identifier: #42. Facility census: 60. a) Resident #42 Review of the facility matrix, on 04/03/23 at 10:43 AM, revealed Resident #43 had a history of falls with injury. Review of the physician orders, on 04/03/23 at 10:44 AM, found the following order, Nonskid footwear for resident safety as resident allows which was given on 04/19/21. Review of Resident #42's care plan, on 04/03/23 at 10:45 AM, found the following focus area: [Resident's First Name] is at risk for falls: cognitive loss, lack of safety awareness, hx [history] of falls with injury. An intervention associated with the focus area was listed as: Encourage nonskid shoes when out of bed. A dining room observation, on 04/03/23 at 12:12 PM, revealed: -11 residents were in the dining room eating. -CNA #34 was the only…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one (1) of 24 sampled residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Specifically, the facility failed to accurately accept verbal consent on a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form by using only one (1) witness to the consent. Resident identifiers: #43. Facility census: 60. Findings Included: a) Resident #43 A medical record review, completed on 04/03/23 at 1:52 PM, revealed the following details: -There was a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form on file for Resident #43. - Liscensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #46 had accepted verbal consent from Resident #43's Health Care Surrogate (HCS). The verbal consent was accepted on 11/22/22. LPN #46 was the only witness to the verbal consent. Review of instructions on how to complete the POST form from Using the POST Form: Guidance for Healthcare Professionals 2021 Edition, page 20, outlined: If the incapacitated patient's MPOA [Medical Power of Attorney] representative or Health Care Surrogate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$38,255 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $38,255 — penalty dated 2024-02-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2015
BARBER, VALERIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2023
MORRIS, DIANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/02/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+15.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 5%Other / private 8%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$337per resident / day
operating cost
$10,237per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$400per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515131. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next