No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Miletree Center

825 Summit Street, Spencer, WV 25276 · For profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (304) 927-1007 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (304) 927-1007 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Mar 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 41% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
(304) 927-1495 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
218 Market St · (304) 927-0011 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
209 E Main St · (304) 927-6982 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2 Park Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.9%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.6%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.7%7.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.5%0.2%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.7%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.1%15.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.2%27.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.7%22.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.0%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.3%1.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.5%79.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.4%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%11.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.251.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.891.841.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
25.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.1%CMS range 33.3–62.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.4–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge25.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge20.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay7.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.2–14.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
44.7%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 59.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-18)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program while serving from the tray line in the resident dining room. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents. Facility Census: 56. Findings Include:a) Resident Dining RoomOn 08/11/25 12:12 PM, an observation was made of Dietary Aide #46 working the tray line in the resident dining room. The Dietary Aide #46 kept her gloves on and pushed a tray cart from the tray line to the dining room door. The Dietary Aide #46 used the telephone in the dining room with the same gloves on. On 08/11/25 at 12:15 PM, the Dietary Aide #46 returned to the tray line and began putting items on the dining tray while continuing to wear the same gloves. After Surveyor intervention, the Dietary Aide #46 stepped away from the tray line. Dietary Aide #46 completed hand hygiene and returned to the tray line and donned a clean set of gloves.On 08/11/25 at 2:00 PM, Regional Dietary Manager #62 was notified. The Regional Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's legal representative, the resident's attending physician, and the dietician about a worsening Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD) area on the resident's body. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifier: #67. Facility census: 56Findings included:a) Resident #67A record review, completed on 08/14/25 at 10:00 AM, revealed that Resident #67 had a documented Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD) area on his intergluteal cleft on his buttocks. A Skin and Wound Evaluation, dated 06/11/25, revealed the following details:MASD Type: Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD)In-house acquiredWound measurements: Area - 39.5 cm2, Length - 9.3 cm, and Width - 6.7 cmDenuded - loss of epidermis caused by exposure to urine, feces, body fluids, wound exudate or friction.Progress - deteriorating Notification boxes for Physician, Resident's Responsible Party, and Dietician were left blankThere was no evidence in the Progress Notes section of the electronic medical record that indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) including all high risk drug classes for Resident #5. This is true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under unnecessary medications. Resident Identfier: #5. Facility Census: 56. Findings Include:a) Resident #5On 08/14/25 at 9:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #5. The review found the MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] section N entitled Medications did not indicate the use of an antianxiety medication, Buspar.On 08/14/25 at 10:05 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator were notified. The DON confirmed the MDS did not include the use of an antianxiety medication.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident's Pre-admission Screening reflected a current diagnosis for Resident #1. Resident identifier: #1. Facility Census 56. Findings included:a) Resident #1Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. A review of the Resident #1's documentation revealed the following:-Document titled [NAME] Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources Pre-admission SCREENING dated 04/14/25, Question 40. Major Mental Illness or suspected MI is marked i. None/N/A-Document titled Diagnosis Report included a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode, Unspecified on 04/18/25 Interview with Administrator on 08/14/25 at 10:50am who acknowledge that a Pre-admission Screening had not been completed to reflect resident's current diagnosis.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a care plan including all diagnoses for Resident #5 and #6. This is true for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed under unnecessary medications. Resident Identifiers: #5 and #6. Facility Census: 56.Findings Include:a) Resident #5On 08/13/25 at 9:15 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #5. The review found the care plan had not been developed to include all diagnoses. The following diagnoses are as follows: --Non-Alzheimer's disease--Paraplegia--Transient Paralysis --Acute Embolism and Thrombosis, lower extremity--Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy--Retention of UrineOn 08/13/25 at 3:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified. The DON did confirm all the diagnoses were not included in the care plan.b) Resident #6On 08/13/25 at 11:00 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #6. The review found the care plan had not been developed to include all diagnoses. The diagnoses are as follows:--Panic disorder--Dizziness--Muscle Weakness (generalized)--Inflammatory Liver disease--Chronic Viral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan when a psychotropic medication was discontinued and an incorrect diagnosis was listed for Resident #5. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident Identifier: #5. Facility Census: 56.Findings Include:a) Resident #5On 08/13/25 at 9:15 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #5. The review found the care plan had not been revised when an antidepressant was discontinued and an incorrect diagnosis was listed. The review found the resident was ordered Celexa 10mg (milligram) by mouth daily for depression from 01/12/24 through 11/16/24. Also, the review found a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease, which the resident has never been diagnosed with.On 08/13/25 at 3:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified. The DON confirmed the Celexa had been discontinued and the resident did not have a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease. DON notified.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for Resident #4 for side effect monitoring and behavior monitoring of a psychotropic medication. This was true for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident identifier: #4. Facility Census: 56.Findings Include:a) Resident #4On 08/13/25 at 11:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #4. The resident had a diagnosis of depression, unspecified and schizophrenia, unspecified. The resident is receiving Prozac 40mg (milligram) by mouth daily for depression. The resident is not currently receiving any medication for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. However, there is no behavior or side effect monitoring documenation for the antidepressant, Prozac. On 08/13/25 at 11:50 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged there is no behavior or side effect monitoring for the antidepressant Prozac.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and observations, the facility failed to ensure a resident was served food in the correct consistency according to the National Dysphagia Diet Levels as ordered by the physician. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #16. Facility Census: 56.Findings included:a) Resident #16At approximately 12:40 PM on 8/12/25, Resident #16 was given crackers on her plate with a puree diet. This was verified with the Regional Dietary Manager that Kitchen Aide #49 placed the crackers on the plate for Resident #16. Resident #16 crumbled the crackers up with her hands, dropped the crumbled crackers into the soup, and was getting ready to take a bite before surveyor intervention prevented Resident #16 from eating the soup with crackers. The Regional Dietary Manager produced a speech therapy document that read, Dysphagia Advanced (residents) may have crackers with soups. However, Resident #16 had an order for puree which is a different diet description.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review the facility failed to provide at least three (3) meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtime in the community in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests and plan of care. Resident identifier: #63. Facility census 56.Findings Included:a)Resident #63A review of the Five-Day Follow-Up investigation completed by the facility on 04/25/25 after resident alleged that she did not receive a breakfast or lunch tray on 04/20/25 revealed the facility substantiated the the report. Nurse Aide (NA) #37 and Licensed Practical Nurse #101 acknowledged that Resident #63 was not given a breakfast tray or lunch tray on 04/20/25.Posted Meal times for residents are as follows: 7:15 AM Breakfast12:00 PM Lunch5:15 PM DinnerInterview with Administrator on 08/19/25 at 2:33 PM who acknowledge that Resident's incident report was substantiated by staff who completed investigation prior to current Administrators current position at this facility.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete medical record for Resident #10's Physician's Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form and two (2) transfer forms for Resident #5. This is true for two (2) of 22 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #10 and #5. Facility Census: 56.Findings Include: a) Resident #10 On 08/11/2025 at 3:04 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #10. The review found the POST form dated 01/31/25 was incomplete. Section D, entitled Medically Assisted Nutrition, did not list a choice regarding feeding through a new or existing surgical tubes, a time-limited trial of the amount of days but no surgically placed tubes, or no artificial means of nutrition desired or discussed but no decision made (provide standard of care). On 08/14/2025 at 10:08 AM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Section D of the POST form was incomplete. b) Resident #5 On 08/14/25 at 1:15 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #5 regarding hospitalizations. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b) Resident #42 On 07/09/24 at 1:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #42. The review found a physician's order dated 05/31/24 stating, Restraint: Seatbelt while in wheelchair for inability to maintain upright sitting position independently. Release seatbelt every 2 (two) hours for repositioning. (Typed as written.) A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] significant change did not have any indication for the use of restraints. On 07/09/24 at 2:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the MDS was incorrect and should have indicated the use of restraints. c) Resident #20 On 07/09/24 at 1:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #20. The review found a physician's order dated 05/31/24 stating, Restraint: Seatbelt while in wheelchair for inability to maintain upright sitting position independently. Release seatbelt every 2 (two) hours for repositioning. (Typed as written.) A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] significant change did not have any indication for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #10 regarding a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, Resident #20 for the use of restraints, Resident #52 for fall interventions and meal intake and Resident #47 regarding dental care. This was true for five (5) of 15 residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifiers: #10, #20, #52 and #47. Facility Census: 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #10 On 07/09/24 at 11:15 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #10. The review found the care plan was not developed regarding the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. On 07/09/24 at 11:50 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the care plan did not include the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. b) Resident #20 On 07/09/24 at 1:30PM, a record review was completed for Resident #20. The review found the care plan was not developed regarding the use of restraints. On 07/09/24 at 2:00 PM, the DON confirmed the care plan did not include the use of restraints. c1) Resident #52 On 07/12/24 at 12:00 PM, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition which are consistent with professional standards of practice. This failed practice was found true for two (2) of (2) two residents looked at for nutrition during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers #9, and #52. Facility Census 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #9 An initial observation on 07/08/24 at 1:00 PM, of Resident #9 eating lunch revealed, she had only eaten about 25% of her lunch and her tray was away from her. A record review on 07/09/24 at 2:20 PM, of Resident #9's weights read as follows: 7/5/2024 16:23 138.8 pounds (Lbs) 6/4/2024 10:18 140.4 Lbs 6/3/2024 17:02 140.4 Lbs 6/3/2024 10:58 144.4 Lbs 5/4/2024 10:57 148.8 Lbs 4/2/2024 10:20 139.0 Lbs 4/1/2024 15:52 139.0 Lbs 3/1/2024 15:15 155.8 Lbs These weights show a 10.91 percent weight loss in (4) four months and a (6) six percent weight loss in one month. Further record review revealed a Nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to record temperatures for the medication refrigerator. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 57. Findings Include: a) Medication Refrigerator On 07/10/24 at 9:25 AM, a tour of the medication room was completed. The tour found one (1) medication refrigerator temperatures were not being documented in June, 2024 and July, 2024. The following dates indicate no documentation had been completed: --07/08/24 PM --06/26/24 PM --06/27/24 PM --06/28/24 PM b) Facility Policy A review of the facility policy entitled, Medication and Vaccine Refrigerator/Freezer Temperatures with a revision date of 07/01/24 was reviewed on 07/10/24 at 9:35 AM. The review found under the heading, Policy, which stated, Refrigerators and freezers used to store medications and vaccines will operate within acceptable temperature range and will checked twice a day for proper temperatures. On 07/10/24 at 9:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the refrigerator temperatures were not documented.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review and staff interview the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and emergency dental care. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one residents looked at for dental treatment during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #47. Facility Census 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #47 During the initial interview on 07/08/24 at 4:55 PM, Resident #47 stated, My teeth bother me a lot, some of them are broken off at the gums. I don't say much about it because I can not afford the dental care. I think I have two dollars. During the initial observation on 07/08/24 at 4:55 PM, it was revealed Resident #47 has teeth which are in poor condition with many broken off at the gum line. A record review on 07/09/24 at 3:34 PM revealed, Resident #47 had the following care plan created on 01/14/23 related to dental care: Focus: Resident is at risk for oral health or dental care problems as evidenced by being edentulous. Goal: The resident will maintain intact oral mucous membranes as evidence by the absence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an appropriate infection control program for storage of a bath basin, bed pan, disposal of soiled linen and transportation of personal belongings. These were random opportunities for discovery. Facility Census: 57. a) room [ROOM NUMBER]A On 07/08/24 at 1:28 PM, an observation was made in room [ROOM NUMBER]A. The observation found a used bath basin and bed pan sitting in the bathtub; a soiled washcloth was on the side of the bathtub as well as a soiled washcloth was hanging on the window seal. Nurse Aide (NA) #58 was notified and removed the bath basin, bed pan, and soiled washcloths from the room. NA #58 stated, let me take care of this. On 07/08/24 at approximately 1:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and confirmed the bath basin and the bed pan were not stored correctly; and, the soiled linens were not disposed of in the correct manner. The DON stated, Hospice was just in there giving the resident a bath .the items should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and staff interview the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity regarding meal service in the main dining room and for Resident #36. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: #36. Facility census: 57 Findings included: a) Main Dining Room During an observation of meal services on 07/09/24 at 12:15 PM, dependent resident's trays being placed in front of them at the same time as table mates without dining limitations. The dependent resident was not assisted until all trays were served in the dining room and there was an available staff member to assist them. An interview took place at 1:36 PM with the Director of Nursing (Don). The Director of Nursing was present throughout the serving process and verified that all residents at a table should be serve at the same time and dependent residents should be assisted when their tray is placed in front of them. b) Resident #36 On 07/09/24 at 11:40 AM, an observation of Resident #36 was made during the noon meal. Occupational Therapist Aide (OTA) #71 was standing while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of multiple transfers to the hospital for Resident #10. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident Identifier: #10. Facility Census: 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #10 Findings Include: On 07/10/24 at 3:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #10. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility three (3) times. The dates of transfer are as follows: --09/30/23 --10/01/23 --10/09/23 On 07/11/24 at 9:50 AM, upon request of the notifications to the Ombudsman, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, we don't have anything .the person doing the notifications didn't know it included transfers .they thought it was only discharges.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide bed hold notices of multiple transfers to the hospital for Resident #10. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident Identifier: #10. Facility Census: 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #10 On 07/10/24 at 3:30 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #10. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility three (3) times. The dates of transfer are as follows: --09/30/23 --10/01/23 --10/09/23 On 07/11/24 at 9:50 AM, upon request of the bed hold notices , the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, we don't have anything .they weren't done.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) upon discharge of Resident #22. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of resident assessment. Resident Identifier: #22. Facility Census: 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #22 On 07/10/24 11:10 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #22. The review found the MDS Discharge Return Not Anticipated dated on 03/01/24 was completed but not transmitted within greater than 120 days. On 07/10/24 at 12:10 PM, an interview was held with Clinical Reimbursement Coordinator (CRC) #5. CRC #5 was notified and acknowledged the discharge MDS was completed but was not transmitted. CRC #5 stated, I don't know why it wasn't transmitted .I'll have to look into this.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL's) to maintain good personal hygiene for dependent residents. This is true for 0ne (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for ADL care. Resident Identifiers: #49. Facility census: 57. Findings included: a) Resident #49 During an observation 07/08/24 at about 12:19 PM Resident #49 appeared to be unkept, with oily hair and facial hair. A continued record review of Resident #49's Significant Change, 04/18/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS), MDS Section E (Behaviors) also indicated Resident #49 does not reject care. A review of Resident #49's ADL documentation found, only two (2) showers noted in the last 30 days. On 07/10/24 at 10:03 AM the Director of Nursing verified Resident #49 did not receive all showers as scheduled.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program which meets the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (1) one residents reviewed for activities during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers #13. Facility Census 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #13 During the initial interview on 07/08/24 at 3:05 PM, Resident #13 stated, I used to attend activities, I just don't anymore. I don't know why. I sometimes don't know what is going on. A record review on 07/09/24 at 9:30 AM, of Resident #13's medical record revealed, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Further record review of Resident #13's Activity participation record shows during her 48 days at the facility she participated in 8 out of room group activities. A record review on 07/09/24 at 10:00 AM, of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/29/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding the release of restraints. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed under the care area of restraints. Resident Identifiers: #42 and #20. Facility Census: 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #42 On 07/09/24 at 1:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #42. The review found a physician's order dated 05/31/24 stating, Restraint: Seatbelt while in wheelchair for inability to maintain upright sitting position independently. Release seatbelt every 2 (two) hours for repositioning. (Typed as written.) On 07/09/24 at 1:10 PM, a review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) was reviewed for June, 2024. The review found the TAR was missing documentation for the following dates: --06/18/24 2:00 PM --06/18/24 4:00 PM --06/30/24 4:00 PM On 07/09/24 at 2:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no documentation on the TAR for 06/18/24 at 2:00 PM, 4:00 PM and 06/30/24 at 4:00 PM. b) Resident #20 On 07/09/24 at 1:30 PM, a record review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice. This failed practice was found true for (1) one of (3) three residents reviewed for pain during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #43. Facility Census 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #43 During an initial interview on 07/08/24 at 2:09 PM, Resident #43 stated, My pain is an 8 or above all the time. I want a different doctor but no more are available. They won't give me pain meds to help. Resident states his pain is an 8 or above all the time. A record review on 07/09/24 at 11:37 AM, of Resident #43 orders revealed the following pain medications ordered for Resident #43. Ordered on 04/24/24 : Acetaminophen Tablet 325 milligrams (MG) Give 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for General Discomfort Notify physician/midlevel provider if discomfort persists. Do not exceed 3g/day Ordered on 05/29/24: Naprosyn Oral Tablet 500 MG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete record regarding a transfer for Resident #10. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed under the care area of hospitalizations. Resident Identifier: #10. Facility Census: 57. Findings Include: a) Resident #10 On 07/11/24 at 1:00 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #10. The review found the resident had been transferred to an acute care facility on 10/09/23. The transfer form indicated the resident was transferred on 10/01/23. On 07/11/24 at 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the date was incorrect on the transfer form. The DON stated, there was a corporate call discussing this issue .it does have the incorrect date.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to honor resident privacy when leaving an elopement binder containing resident pictures and elopement risk identification forms in the front lobby accessible to any passerby. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for 18 residents. Resident identifiers: #26, #51, #6, #54, #2, #53, #37, #39, #49, #34, #45, #46, #43, #111, #211, #40, #24, and #13. Faciity census: 61. Findings included: a) Elopement Binder Observation, on 03/06/23 at 10:38 AM, found the facility's elopement binder in the front lobby accessible to any passerby. The elopement binder contained resident pictures and an elopement risk identification form completed for each resident who had been deemed an elopement risk. The resident picture and the elopement risk identification form were to be provided to law enforcement and search party at the time of any resident elopement. The elopement risk identification forms included resident information like date of birth , distinguishing characteristics like colostomy bag, last known address in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility grievances, facility reportables, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations of neglect were reported within 24 hours to appropriate state agencies as required. This had the potential to cause more than minimal harm. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #8, #32, #44, and #56. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #8 On 03/07/23 at 2:04 PM, a review of the facility grievance log from September 2022 through March 2023 found the following resident complaint: -On 10/13/22, Resident #8's family member asked how often resident should be being showered. She was told at least twice a week and bed baths in between those times. Resident #8's family member reported, Well, that isn't happening. The family member also reported Resident #8's teeth are not getting cleaned. During an interview on 03/08/23 at 10:10 AM, Social Worker #6 agreed that the concerns mentioned in the resident grievance should have been considered an allegation of neglect and it should have been reported according to state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure monthly pharmacy medication reviews were completed by the consulting pharmacist and reviewed by the physician. This was true for three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifiers: #38, #30, and #4. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #38 A record review, completed on 03/08/23 at 3:02 PM, found the following progress notes from the consulting pharmacist: -Drug Regimen Review Documentation, dated 10/20/2022 at 6:07 PM, revealed A medication regimen review was performed- see report for comments/recommendation(s) noted. -Drug Regimen Review Documentation, dated 12/16/2022 at 10:17 AM, revealed A medication regimen review was performed- see report for comments/recommendation(s) noted. -Drug Regimen Review Documentation, dated 02/20/2023 at 10:29 AM, revealed A medication regimen review was performed- see report for comments/recommendation(s) noted. The pharmacist reports for the months of October 2022, December 2022, and February 2023 were not scanned into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Infection Control program. Staff failed to wear a face shield during tracheostomy (trach) care and maintain sterile technique during trach cleaning and care. In addition, kitchen staff failed to perform hand hygiene and residents hand hygiene was not performed prior to eating. These failed practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #41. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #41 On 03/08/23 at 11:00 AM observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #83 opened the sterile tracheostomy (trach) care kit and proceeded to put on sterile gloves. After pouring hydrogen peroxide into two (2) of the sections in the trach care kit, LPN #83 removed the soiled trach dressing and proceeded to take sterile swabs, dipped into the peroxide solution and clean around the trach stoma. After removing the sterile gloves, performed hand washing and put on unsterile gloves, removed the inner cannula and placed into one of the sections…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directive paperwork was kept on Resident #30's medical chart. This was true for one (1) of 22 sample residents. Resident identifier: #30. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #30 An electronic medical record review, completed on 03/06/23 at 3:14 PM, indicated that Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. It also identified the following details: -A Physician Determination of Capacity was on file and indicated Resident #30 had capacity to make her own medical decisions. -A WV Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form was on file and indicated Resident #30 had reported there was a family member who had been appointed as Resident #30's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) in the event the resident lost capacity and could no longer make her own medical decisions. The professional who assisted in completing the form was identified as the facility's Social Worker. -There was no copy of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment. This is true for two (2) of 21 sample residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifiers: #41 and #59. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #59 A discharge medical record review of Resident #59's revealed a progress note on 1/14/23 at 9:56 AM that stated that the Resident left Against Medical Advice (AMA) with her responsible party. According to the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Discharge assessment for Resident #59, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 01/14/23, Section A (Identification information) was not accurately assessed for discharge return not anticipated, unplanned to an acute hospital. During an interview on 03/08/23 at 9:58 AM the Clinical Reimbursement Coordinator (CRC) Nurse confirmed Resident #59's Discharge MDS was incorrect. She stated that Resident #59 was discharged to home. b) Resident #41's History of Trauma…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with decision-making capacity was informed of the initial plan for delivery of care and services by receiving a written summary of the baseline care plan. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed for care plans. Resident identifier: #41. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #41 During an interview on 03/06/23 at 11:01 AM, Resident #41 reported she could not recall being invited to care plan meetings or receiving a copy of the initial baseline care plan. A record review, completed on 03/07/23 at 7:45 PM, revealed: -Resident #41 had decision-making capacity. -Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #95, on 12/12/2022 at 9:37 AM, documented Resident #41 was out of the facility at the hospital -Social Worker #6 documented in the Post admission Patient/Family Conference Note, dated 12/12/22 at 9:46 AM, The following were in attendance: Patient, Social Services, and CRC [Clinical Research Coordinator]. Expectations: Patient's stay is expected to be Short Term.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one (1) of 22 sample residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. A history of trauma/Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was not addressed for Resident #41. Resident identifier: #41. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #41 During an interview, on 03/06/23 at 11:26 AM , Resident #41 reported she had a history of trauma in early life affecting privacy concerns and would like to have counseling. A record review, completed on 03/07/23 at 7:45 PM, revealed: -Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -A Social Services Assessment, dated 11/23/22, revealed Resident #41 reported a history of trauma and/or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Resident answered, Quite a bit when asked in the past month, if she had repeated, disturbing memories, thoughts or images of a stressful experience from the past. Resident answered, Moderately when asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    c) Resident #41 During an interview on 03/06/23 at 11:01 AM, Resident #41 reported she could not recall being invited to care plan meetings. A record review, completed on 03/07/23 at 7:45 PM, revealed: -Resident #41 had decision-making capacity. -LPN #95, on 12/12/2022 at 9:37 AM, documented Resident #41 was out of the facility at the hospital -Social Worker #6 documented in the Post admission Patient/Family Conference Note, dated 12/12/22 at 9:46 AM, The following were in attendance: Patient, Social Services, and CRC [Clinical Research Coordinator]. Expectations: Patient's stay is expected to be Short Term. Patient/family and IDT agree upon projected length of stay. Advance Directives not yet in place. The role of each IDT member was discussed. Discussed rehospitalization and the clinical capabilities of Center if the patient's condition changes, and the benefits of staying at the Center for treatment. Additional Information Discussed: Prior living situation, Prior level of function, Current level of function, Recent losses/traumatic events, Behavior symptoms/successful approaches,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on policy review, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services in a timely fashion in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. The facility failed to obtain a resident's weight upon admission. This was true for one (1) of 22 sample residents during the annual recertification survey. Resident identifier: #261. Facility census: 61. Review of the facility's Weights and Heights Policy, with a review date of 06/15/22, instructed, Patients are weighed upon admission and/or re-admission . Findings included: a) Resident #261 On 03/06/23 at 2:29 PM, an electronic health record review revealed: -Resident #261 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -Resident #261's first weight was documented on 03/04/23. -A physician order, dated 03/06/24 at 1:08 PM, Weigh every day shift every Wed [Wednesday] for four (4) Weeks AND every day shift on the 1st and ending on the 5th every month. During an interview, on 03/08/23 at 8:59 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #58 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Infection Control program. Staff failed to wear a face shield during tracheostomy (trach) care and maintain sterile technique during trach cleaning and care. In addition, kitchen staff failed to perform hand hygiene and residents hand hygiene was not performed prior to eating. These failed practices had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #41, #161. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #41 On 03/08/23 at 11:00 AM observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #83 opened the sterile tracheostomy (trach) care kit and proceeded to put on sterile gloves. After pouring hydrogen peroxide into two (2) of the sections in the trach care kit. LPN #83 removed the soiled trach dressing and proceeded to take sterile swabs, dipped into the peroxide solution and clean around the trach stoma. After removing the sterile gloves, performed hand washing and put on unsterile gloves, removed the inner cannula and placed into one of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a trauma survivor received trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. This was true for one (1) of 22 residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #41. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #41 A medical record review, completed on 03/08/23 at 8:45 AM, revealed the following: -Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. -A Social Services Assessment, dated 11/23/22, revealed Resident #41 reported a history of trauma and/or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Resident answered, Quite a bit when asked in the past month, if she had repeated, disturbing memories, thoughts or images of a stressful experience from the past. Resident answered, Moderately when asked in the past month…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, the facility failed to have an accurate diagnosis for a psychotropic medication. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for Unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: #12. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Resident #12 A medical record review for Resident #12 found, Physician orders: --Celexa Oral Tablet 20 MG (Citalopram Hydrobromide) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression, with an order date 12/23/2022. --Seroquel Oral Tablet 100 MG (Quetiapine Fumarate) Give 100 mg by mouth two times a day for mood and behaviors. Order date 12/23/2022. --Seroquel Oral Tablet 200 MG (Quetiapine Fumarate) Give 200 mg by mouth at bedtime for mood and behaviors. Order date12/23/2022 --Buspirone HCl Tablet 15 MG Give 2 tablet by mouth two times a day for anxiety Give two tablets (30mg), Order date 12/23/22. Continued medical record review of Resident #12's active diagnosis list did not find diagnoses for Depression or Anxiety. On 03/08/23 at 1:25 PM during an Interview the Administrator verified Resident #12 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on Interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all qualified staff had their food handler's card. This has the ability to affect all Residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility census: 61. Findings included: a) Kitchen On 03/08/22 at 2:00 PM a review of training certificate for food handlers found: Dietary [NAME] #38 - No documentation of Food Handlers Training prior to 03/06/23. During an Interview with the District Manager on 03/08/23 at 2:20 PM, verified the staff in question did not have Food Handlers Training until this date. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to complete labeling and dates on refrigerator items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to storage. This has the ability to affect a limited number of Residents that get their nutrition from the kitchen. Facility Census: 61. Findings Included: a) Kitchen During the initial kitchen tour on 03/06/23 at 11:00 AM., an observation found: --Walk-in refrigerator -a container with 3 cabbage heads, and a large container of wilted loose-leaf lettuce was not labeled or dated. During an interview on 03/06/23 at 11:12 AM., the Account Manager, confirmed the items were not labeled. She removed the lettuce at this time and labeled the container of cabbage. .

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record. A Physician Order for Scope of Treatment Form (POST Form) was not filled out and the hard medical chart did not contain the updated POST form. This practice affected one (1) of (22), residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier #21. Facility census: # 61. Findings included: a) Resident #21 A electronic medical record review on 03/07/23 at 9:14 AM revealed, Resident #21's Post form Section D did not contain the required physician's full name , date signed, phone number or License number. A review of Resident #21's active hard chart did not contain the active/revised POST form. During an interview on 03/07/23 at 10:49 AM, the Social Worker verified the wrong POST form was on Resident #21's hard chart and the revised Post did not contain all required information in section D. .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.3+1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS WV HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
CHRISTIANSEN, CARROLLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/09/2025
STARCHER, CHRISTIANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/09/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense41% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 9%Other / private 8%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 41% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$399per resident / day
operating cost
$12,128per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$404per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515182. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next