No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

White Sulphur Springs Center

345 Pocahontas Trail, White Sulphur Spring, WV 24986 · For profit - Corporation · 68 certified beds · (304) 536-4661 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$59,233 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $59,233 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
320 W Main St · (304) 536-4870 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
128 Community Ln · (304) 536-2454 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion2.5 mi
1 Alvon Rd · (304) 536-9103 · Call to confirm hours
Park
317 Mill Hill Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2817 Pocahontas Trl · (304) 536-3707

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.2%14.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.7%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.0%15.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication54.1%27.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%97.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.7%22.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.6%13.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%79.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.7%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%11.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.081.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.181.841.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.0%CMS range 35.8–58.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.2–15.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.5–9.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.85
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
23.4%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 65.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-10)
24
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-09-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents were served food in the correct consistency according to the facility's diet description for puree consistency solids. It was determined that this failed practice placed all (5) five residents currently on a puree diet in an immediate jeopardy situation. Providing a resident with the wrong consistency of food could result in choking, and/or aspiration pneumonia which can lead to serious harm and/or death. This failed practice was found to be true for five (5) of five (5) residents reviewed for diet consistency during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: #12, #21, #33, #38, and #53. Facility Census: 65.Findings Include: a) Puree diets A record review on 09/08/25 at 11:00 AM, revealed a diet order for Resident #38 that read as follows:Regular/Liberalized-Dys Puree. Thick Liquids-Nectar. Resident #38 had a diagnosis of Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase. An observation of the lunch meal on 09/08/25 at 12:30 PM, revealed Resident #38 being served a tray that included puree…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure its residents were not abused. The facility failed to provide services to residents that were necessary to avoid mental or emotional harm. In addition, the facility failed to protect residents when verbal and physical threats were made. This was true for 1 (one) of 1 (one) resident reviewed during the Long-Term Survey Process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifier #42, and #61. This created an immediate jeopardy situation. Findings include: a) Resident #42 On 07/08/24 at 1:30 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #42. At that time, Resident #42 stated, I don't sleep much at night due to Resident #61 coming into my room at night. I nap during the day, so I don't wake up to find him in my room. It scares me. That's why I had the staff put up the stop sign in my door. On 07/08/24 at 9:11 PM a review of Resident #61's medical record was performed. It revealed several notes in the documentation related to physical and verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. During the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY ]Based on medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow up on physician's recommendations for a biopsy of Resident #29 thyroid nodules upon readmission to the facility on [DATE]. This was true for one (1) of nineteen (19) residents care reviewed during the long-term care survey process. This created a situation of immediate jeopardy. Resident identifier: Resident #29. Census: 64. Finding included: a) Resident #29 No documentation in the chart of surrogate being notified of the hospitals recommendations to refer to and ENT (Ear Nose and Throat) for a possible biopsy of thyroid nodules. On [DATE] at 11:43 PM during an interview with the DON and NP confirmed the health care surrogate had not been contacted about the referral to the ENT because the resident made it clear upon her admission in 2022 that she did not want treatments. Therefore, they did not contact the surrogate. The NP further stated she believed that the resident would not want this done because she didn't want her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Record review and family and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a safe environment to prevent elopement, resulting in Resident #120 leaving the facility and being found outside the facility, deceased . The facility ' s failure to ensure residents did not exit the facility unattended on [DATE] placed all at risk residents who could have exited the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation.This will be cited at past noncompliance because the facility corrected the failure as of [DATE], prior to this survey. This was true for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for accidents and one (1) of three (3) reviewed for elopement during the survey process.Resident Identifier: 120. Facility census: 64 Findings include: A) Facility report/investigation According to the facility ' s report: At approximately 12:35 PM on [DATE], Resident #120 was found outside the facility, face down, unresponsive. Preliminary investigation by the facility revealed a nurse had checked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement their grievance policy procedure to locate lost clothing and follow-up with resident/resident representative in a timely fashion. Resident identifier: #31. Facility census: 65.Findings included: a) Resident #31 On 11/18/25 at 7:30 PM, an electronic medical record review was completed. The record review revealed RN #68 had documented resident's sister had reported she had brought in twelve (12) pairs of socks but resident no longer had any in his room. RN #68 checked with laundry and the laundry staff member stated he had not seen them. This was documented on 09/27/25 at 10:32 AM. There was no further documentation in the electronic medical record related to the allegation of missing socks. Review of the facility grievance log, which was completed on 11/18/25 at 7:50 PM, found there had not been a written grievance completed for the allegation of missing socks for Resident #31. During a telephone interview on 11/19/25 at 12:15 PM, Resident #31's representative stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure it had a clean, comfortable, homelike environment. This deficient practice was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident identifiers: #18, #3, #32. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident's #18 and #3 On 09/03/25 at 2:27 PM found Resident #18's bathroom corner commode had a hole through the drywall to allow the toilet handle to function. The base of the commode was stained yellow and had a black substance around the base. An observation of the toilet room in Resident #3's room found a black substance around the base of the commode with a white caulking substance erratically applied over the black substance. On 09/10/25 at 11:30 AM an observation with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) of Resident's #18 and #3's toilet room confirmed Resident #18 and #3's toilet rooms were in disrepair. b) Laundry On 09/09/2025 2:45 PM an observation was conducted of the laundry with Regulatory Compliance Advisor (RCO) and the Laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure it notified the Ombudsman of discharges/transfers. This was true for three (3) of seven (7) residents.Resident Identifiers: #72, #71,and #68. Facility Census: 65. a) Resident #72 09/10/2025 8:54 AM record review revealed Resident #72 was discharged to another skilled nursing facility on 08/02/24. The review of this discharge revealed no evidence that the Ombudsman was not notified of Resident #72's discharge. This was discussed with Employee #89. b) Resident #71 On 09/09/25 at 9:10 PM Resident #71 a review of the discharge record found no evidence that the Ombudsman had been notified of the discharge. c) Resident #68 A review of the discharge record on 09/04/25 at 11:21 AM found Resident #68 had been transferred to a local hospital and was discharged from the facility on 08/04/25. The family requested the discharge so that Resident #68 could be closer to family. There was no evidence that the Ombudsman had been notified. An interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Social Worker (SW) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed follow the menus by not serving the correct serving sizes per the dietary guide sheet, not serving the residents large portions as ordered by the physician and serving items listed on the tray card not to serve. Resident Identifiers: #36, #61, #53, #4 and #21. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) On 09/03/2025 at 11:50 AM, [NAME] #59 was serving/plating the lunch meal. The menu consisted of Chicken and Cheese Quesadillas, Gelatin Cubes, Cilantro [NAME] 1/2 cup and Fiesta Corn 1/2 cup. Mashed Potatoes and Fajita Vegetable Miz - 1/2 cup were confirmed by Dining Director # 67. The following items were served with less than full scoops and then were not emptied all the way onto the plate. Serving sizes were less than stated on facility's Diet Guide Sheet for meal service for corn, mashed potatoes, rice and fajita mix. Whole scoops were not utilized, which was confirmed by the Regulatory Compliance Officer and Administrator # 90. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: a) The facility's policy and procedure for dry food storage stated, 2.3 Food stock is dated on the day of receipt. Items that are removed from the original box are individually dated. 2.6 Open packages are stored in closed containers, tightly secured with ties or in a food quality storage bags and include the use by date. The facility's policy and procedure for Refrigerated/Frozen Storage stated, 1.4 All foods are labeled with the name of the product and the date received and use by date once opened. Manufacturer use by dates are used until opened. 1.5 Prepared foods are labeled and dated with the name of the product, date opened, and use by date. Dining District Manager #74 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention program to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the transmission of infections. This failed practice was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier #43. Facility Census 65.a) Laundry On 09/09/25 at 2:45 PM a tour of the facility laundry was conducted with the Regulatory Compliance Advisor (RCO) and the Laundry Supervisor. A basket full of clean socks was found stored on the floor in the clean laundry. The Laundry Supervisor was asked if the clean socks were stored to prevent contamination, he responded No. In the soiled laundry, there were three (3) open bags of soiled laundry on the floor. The Laundry Supervisor stated he had put those there as they needed an empty barrel on the unit. When asked if the bags were stored properly, he stated No. b) Resident #43 An observation on 09/09/25 at 12:08 PM, revealed a sign on Resident #43's door for contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a updated Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for a resident with a new diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder. Resident Identifier: #11. Facility Census: 65. Findings included: On 09/03/2025 at 12:41 PM, Resident #11's PASARR was reviewed. The resident's PASRR was completed on 02/19/2025 and did not include Bipolar Disorder. The diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder was added to the resident's diagnosis list on 03/12/2025. The resident's PASARR was not updated to reflect the new diagnosis. On 09/09/2025 at 01:26 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed their was no diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder on the resident's PASARR and and stated, I will get a new one started.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited Activities of Daily Living (ADL) ability was provided the necessary services to maintain grooming by assisting with facial hair removal. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #36. Facility Census: 65. a) Resident #36On 09/02/25 at 5:42 PM, the state surveyor observed facial hair on Resident # 36 during the initial survey interview process. The patient reported he did not want the facial hair and stated, I want it shaved. and They need to do it. Nursing Assistant #12 confirmed the resident's facial hair growth and stated she would get it shaved.09/09/25 at 8:45 AM, the resident was observed to still have facial hair. The state surveyor asked the resident if they had shaved him and the resident replied, A long time ago. and You can see it. Licensed Practical Nurse #37 confirmed the resident's facial hair.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice by not putting in physician orders timely related to skin issues. This failed practice was found true for (1) one (3) residents reviewed for general skin issues during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifier #8. Facility Census 65. Findings include: a) Resident #8The initial observation on 09/02/25 at 2:00 PM, revealed a bandage to Resident #8's right arm dated 09/01.Further observation on 09/03/25 at 2:00 PM, revealed a bandage to Resident #8's right arm dated 09/01.An observation on 09/04/25 at 10:00 AM, revealed a bandage to Resident #8's right arm dated 09/01.A record review on 09/04/25 at 10:30 AM, found no mention of the bandage to right arm in the medical record for Resident #8. During an interview, on 09/04/2025 at 10:40 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, So the nurse on Monday discovered skin tears. I just talked to him, and he said that he got a skin tear from scratching his arm on the bed. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to employ qualified dietary staff, due to letting employees work in the dietary department before obtaining food handler permits. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 64. Findings include: a) At approximately 10:00 AM on 07/09/2024, food handler permits were requested from the Dining Services Account Manager (DSAM). The DSAM made copies of the ones on file in the dietary office and stated, I'll have to find the others. At approximately 1:30 PM the DSAM stated they were still waiting on a couple food handlers cards. On 07/10/2024, the DSAM supplied a copy of a food handler permit for [NAME] #59, with an issue date of 07/10/2024. Upon review of the employee list provided by the facility, [NAME] #59 has been employed at the facility and working without a food handler permit since 10/17/2023. On 07/11/2024, the DSAM supplied copies of food handler permits for Dietary Aide/Cook #64 and Dietary Aide/Cook #58, both with an issued date of 07/11/2024. Upon review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner, due to having items that were out of date and not dated in the refrigerators, items exposed to the elements, having dirty equipment, and failing to monitor refrigerator temperatures of personal refrigerators in resident rooms. This has the potential to affect all residents receiving food from the kitchen and all residents with personal refrigerators in their rooms. Facility census: 64. Findings include: A) Outdated, undated, and exposed items At approximately 11:20 AM on 07/08/2024 a tour of the kitchen in the facility was conducted. During the tour, the following were found in the walk-in refrigerator: Three (3) trays of cake with no date. A plastic container of beef based with no lid on it. A plastic container of strawberries with no date on it. A cardboard box containing squash with a discard date of 07/01/2024. Twenty (20) individual cookies placed in plastic sleeves were in the dry stock room with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to dispose of refuse in a manner to prevent attracting vermin. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 64. Findings include: a) At approximately 2:00 PM on 07/10/2024, a tour was conducted of the rear of the facility where the facility kept their dumpsters. Upon arriving at the dumpsters, an empty potato chip bag, multiple clear gloves, pieces of food, and clear plastic garbage bags were scattered around and underneath the dumpsters. Three (3) of the four (4) dumpsters had the lids opened, with one missing a lead entirely. One dumpster was leaking a white substance out of the bottom, onto the pavement. At approximately 2:09 PM on 07/10/2024, the Dining Services District Manager acknowledged the trash on the ground and the state of the dumpsters.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for Resident #61's psychotropic medication, dementia, and behaviors. In addition the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect weights no longer be obtained for Resident #59 and the care plan to reflect the surrogate for Resident #29. This was true for 3 (three) of 19 residents reviewed for the Long Term Care Survey process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifiers: #61,#59 and #29. Findings include: a) Resident #61 Psychotropic Medication On 07/08/24 at 9:11 PM a review of Resident #61's medical record was performed. It revealed there were several notes in the documentation related to, refusal of care, physical and verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. During the review, a progress note dated 07/06/24 at 6:05 PM read as follows : This resident was wondering [SIC] in and out of other residents rooms this morning. He was sitting on another residents bed and refused to leave. Multiple attempts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to provide medically related social services for Resident #61 or residents that suffered abuse from Resident #61. This was true for 1 (one) of 3 (three) residents reviewed during the Long-Term Survey Process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifiers: Resident #61 and Resident #42. Findings include: a) Resident #61 On 07/08/24 at 1:30 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #42. At that time, Resident #42 stated, I don't sleep much at night due to Resident #61 coming into my room at night. I nap during the day so I don't wake up to find him in my room. It scares me. That's why I had the staff put up the stop sign in my door. On 07/08/24 at 9:11 PM a review of Resident #61's medical record was performed. It revealed there were several notes in the documentation related to physical and verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. During the review, a progress note dated 07/06/24 at 6:05 PM read as follows : This resident was wondering [SIC] in and out of other residents rooms this morning.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately document medication administration times on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and medication sign out and administration times on the narcotic count sheet for Resident #28 ' s Morphine Sulphate. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 64. Findings include: A) Resident #28 Resident #28 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Liver Cell Carcinoma. He had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, suggesting he was cognitively intact, and was determined to have capacity. Upon review of the resident matrix after arrival to the facility at approximately 11:00 AM on 07/08/2024, it was noted Resident #28 was marked for end of life/palliative care/comfort measures along with 25 other residents in the facility. At approximately 2:15 PM on 07/08/2024, Resident #28 was observed sitting on the side of his bed, bent over at the waist, with his hands almost touching the floor. Staff members then came into the room to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to practice proper infection control to prevent the spread of communicable diseases during lunch service. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census: 64. Findings included: At approximately 12:12 PM on 07/08/2024, an observation was made during lunch service in the 400 hallway of the facility. Nurse Aide (NA) #10 took a tray off the delivery cart, took it to room [ROOM NUMBER] and brought it back to the cart upon realizing the resident was out of the facility. Upon returning to the delivery cart, NA #10 placed the tray back onto the cart with the clean, undelivered trays. NA #10 acknowledged they should not have placed the tray back onto the cart and stated I ' m not sure why I did.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, homelike environment for residents, staff and the public. Issues were found with dead flowers and items being stored over on top of the over bed light fixture. In addition the facility did not have record of fire drills being completed as required. These were random opportunities for discovery during the long term care survey and has the potential to affect all of the residents. Room identifiers: #304, #307. Census: 64. Findings included: a) Exit door window pane across of dining room On 07/08/24 at approximately 2:30 PM during a tour of the facility, the exit door to the court yard located across the hallway from the dining room was observed. This door has a glass insert that would provide a full view of the court yard outside. The glass appeared to have the seal broken with moisture trapped between the panes. The window glass that covered approximately 75% was extremely cloudy, making it impossible to enjoy the view…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to confer with the appointed resident representative regarding the physician recommendation for medical treatment (biopsy of thyroid nodules) and the recommendation of the Registered Dietitian for nutritional support. This was true for one (1) of four (4)residents whose rights were reviewed during the long-term care process. Resident identifier: #29. Census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #29 ENT referral A medical record review on [DATE] at approximately 10:00 AM identified the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 06. It was further identified that the physician note completed on [DATE] stated the patient was alert and oriented x1 with no acute distress and that Resident #29 did not have capacity. It was further identified that the Nurse Practitioner (NP) assisted Resident #29 to complete Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form on [DATE]. The POST form was for no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to allow Resident #28 to participate in his care and make treatment decisions, by failing to inform him of his right to participate in hospice care. The facility also failed to notify the responsible party for Resident #61 of the potential side effects of a psychotropic medication before administration. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for the right to make informed decisions during the survey process. Resident identifiers: #28, #61. Facility census: 64. Findings included: a) Resident #28 Resident #28 was admitted to the facility with the diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Liver Cell Carcinoma. He had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, suggesting he was cognitively intact, and was determined to have capacity. Upon review of the resident matrix after arrival to the facility at approximately 11:00 AM on 07/08/2024, it was noted Resident #28 was marked for end of life/palliative care/comfort measures along with 25 other residents in the facility. At…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement two (2) of 19 resident's care plans. Resident #7's care plan was not implemented in the area of nutritional assistance. Resident #7 was not monitored or assisted with her meal for over one (1) hour after her meal was delivered. Resident #61 had no nutritional care plan developed despite having experienced weight loss. Resident identifiers: #7, #61. Facility census: 64. Findings include: a) Resident #7 07/08/2024 based on record review the flow chart revealed Resident #7's lunch was delivered to her room at 12:00 PM. Before surveyor entered resident's room at 1:05 PM. 07/08/24 at 1:05 PM the surveyor observed resident's tray was not eaten. Her hands appeared constricted, and she was holding her tea between her knuckles and could not place it back on her tray. The resident's roommate stated Resident #7 needed help and could not feed herself. This surveyor asked Resident #7 if she needed help with her food and drink and she said yes. This surveyor went into the hall and found Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to address the needs of residents at risk or already experiencing impaired nutrition and hydration. The facility declined the Registered Dietician dietary recommendations without notifying the surrogate and failed to obtain weights. This was true for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for nutritional needs during the long term care survey process. Resident identifiers: Resident #29 and Resident #61. Census. 64. a) Resident #29- nutritional support During a medical record review on [DATE] at approximately 10:00 AM of Resident #29's medical record, it is identified that the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 06. It is further identified that the physician note completed on [DATE] stated that the patient was alert and oriented x 1 with no acute distress and that Resident #29 does not have capacity at this time. It is further identified that the Nurse Practitioner (NP) assisted Resident #29 to complete the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to follow physician's order related to volume of feeding to be administered to Resident #52. This was true for 1 (one) of 1 (one) resident reviewed for the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifier: #52. Findings include: a) Resident #52 On 07/10/24 at approximately 12:30 PM, a review of Resident #52's medical record was completed which revealed that in the physician's orders, the following order was present: Order: five times a day for Nutrition Jevity 1.5 CAL Administer bolus via gravity 320 ML 5 times per day FLUSH tube with 30 ML of water prior to feeding, and a final 30 ML flush of water at the end of each feeding. Total volume of flush = 300 ML/24 hrs (excluding medication flushes). Total volume of nutrient + this flush = 380 ml (1900 ML/24 hrs.) On 07/10/24 at 12:53 PM, a tube feeding administration observation was completed for Resident #52 with LPN #46. When LPN #46 was preparing the feeding at the cart to take into the room, LPN #46 poured feeding from a 1000…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the Nurse staffing information accurately. Some of the data required was not completed, the direct care staff and the total actual hours worked by the direct care staff was inaccurate. This was true for nine (9) of ten (10) Nurse Staffing forms reviewed during the long term care survey process. Census: 24. Findings included: a) 03/19/23 During a review of the Daily Staffing form on 07/09/24 at approximately 7:30 PM, the total direct care staffing hours identified was 148 hours with a hours per patient day (hppd) for a census of 65 at 2.28. During a review of the Genstar daily staffing sheet and the Genstar daily time detail, the actual total direct care staffing hours were 164.65 with an HPPD of 2.53. 07/10/24 at 08:58 AM during an interview with the Administrator, the Administrator agreed that the total direct care staffing hours identified was not correct for 03/19/23. b) 05/14/23 During a review of the Daily Staffing form on 07/09/24 at approximately 07:30 PM, the total direct care staffing hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and psychiatric services to Resident #61. This was true for 1 (one) of 3 (three) residents reviewed for the Long Term Survey Process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifier: Resident #61. Findings include: a) Resident #61 On 07/08/24 at 9:11 PM a review of Resident #61's medical record was performed. It revealed there were several notes in the documentation related to, refusal of care, physical and verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. During the review, a progress note dated 07/06/24 at 6:05 PM read as follows : This resident was wondering [SIC] in and out of other residents rooms this morning. He was sitting on another residents bed and refused to leave. Multiple attempts to talk with resident and offer food drinks and to go to the bathroom were unsuccessful. Resident was attempting to hit at staff and the residents of the room he had entered. Resident eventually left this residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide necessary appropriate person-centerd care and individualized treatment and services to meet Resident #61's behavioral and psychosocial needs. This was true for 1 (one) of 3 (three) residents reviewed for the Long Term Survey Process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifiers: Resident #61. Findings include: a) Resident #61 On 07/08/24 at 9:11 PM a review of Resident #61's medical record was performed. It revealed there were several notes in the documentation related to physical and verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. During the review, the following documentation was revealed to be entered into Resident #61's medical record: On 07/06/24 at 6:05 PM a progress note read as follows : This resident was wondering [SIC] in and out of other residents rooms this morning. He was sitting on another residents bed and refused to leave. Multiple attempts to talk with resident and offer food drinks and to go to the bathroom were unsuccessful. Resident was attempting to hit at staff and the residents of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an interdisciplinary approach to address Resident #61's needs and to provide the necessary services related to the diagnosis of dementia. This was true for 1 (one) of 3 (three) residents reviewed during the Long Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifier: Resident #61. Findings include: a) Resident #61 On 07/08/24 at 9:11 PM a review of Resident #61's medical record was performed. It revealed there were several notes in the documentation related to, refusal of care, physical and verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. During the review, a progress note dated 07/06/24 at 6:05 PM read as follows : This resident was wondering [SIC] in and out of other residents rooms this morning. He was sitting on another residents bed and refused to leave. Multiple attempts to talk with resident and offer food drinks and to go to the bathroom were unsuccessful. Resident was attempting to hit at staff and the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor Resident #61 for side effects of psychotropic medication after administration of Zyprexa 10mg Intramuscularly (IM). This was true for 1(one) of 5 (five) residents reviewed for the Long Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifier: Resident #61. Findings include: a) Resident #61 On 07/08/24 at approximately 9:11 PM, a review of Resident #61's medical record was performed. It revealed that on 05/19/24 at 11:15 PM the following progress note was entered into Resident #61's medical record: Resident continues to be very restless with poor safety awareness. Attempted again to contact provider at Vis a Vis. Vis a Vis provider's microphone not working. Contacted Dr. [NAME] and instructed to administer 10 milligram (mg) Zyprexa IM. Medication administered as ordered and resident assisted back to bed. Resting in bed at this time with 0 (zero) complaints of (c/o) pain/discomfort. This note was revealed to be a follow up to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to administer a as needed (PRN) psychotropic for a specifically diagnosed condition for Resident #61. This was true for 1 (one) of 5 (five) residents reviewed for the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 64. Resident identifier: #61. Findings include: a) Resident #61 On 07/08/24 at approximately 9:11 PM, a review of Resident #61's medical record was performed. It revealed that on 05/19/24 at 11:15 PM the following progress note was entered into Resident #61's medical record: Resident continues to be very restless with poor safety awareness. Attempted again to contact provider at Vis a Vis. Vis a Vis provider's microphone not working. Contacted Dr. [NAME] and instructed to administer 10 milligram (mg) Zyprexa IM. Medication administered as ordered and resident assisted back to bed. Resting in bed at this time with 0 (zero) complaints of (c/o) pain/discomfort. This note was revealed to be a follow up to a Change in Condition Evaluation with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to make good faith attempts to identify deficiencies of which they had or should have had knowledge of. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program implemented to correct the [NAME] Virginia Portable Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form completions was not being modified correctly. This has the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility that completes a POST form. This was identified during the long term care survey process. Identifier: POST forms. Census: 64 a) Post forms During a POST form document review of on 07/12/24 at approximately 04:00 PM it was identified that a post form cannot be modified. It is stated on the form that if changes are needed you are to void the form and complete a new POST form. It is further noted that to void a POST form the following must be completed; If a patient or MPOA representative/surrogate (for patients lacking capacity) wants to void the form: destroy paper form and contact patients health care provider and the WV e-Directive Registry to void orders in patient's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical records, facility records and staff interview the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee failed to develop corrective actions to effectively change systems level to prevent quality of care and or quality of life problems. The POST forms were not being accurately completed and or modified based on the physician's determination of capacity. All residents had the potential to be affected by this practice. This was discovered during the facilities long term care survey process. Census: 64. a) Post forms During a POST form document review of on 07/12/24 at approximately 4:00 PM it was identified that a post form cannot be modified. It is stated on the form that if changes are needed you are to void the form and complete a new POST form. It is further noted that to void a POST form the following must be completed; If a patient or MPOA representative/surrogate (for patients lacking capacity) wants to void the form: destroy paper form and contact patients' health care provider and the WV e-Directive Registry to void orders in patient's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff are available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. This has the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents at the facility. Census 65. Findings Included: a) Anonymous Resident Interviews On 03/06/23 at 12:19 PM, an anonymous resident complained about having to wait a long time last night to get cleaned up and being left in urine for hours. On 03/06/23 at 1:57 PM, another anonymous resident stated he/she has to sit in their poo for hours, especially if it is meal time. The staff make residents wait until trays are served and picked back up before they will change the residents. This resident also stated, Nurses only want to pass meds and won't help you get cleaned up either. Sometimes I wait for hours for someone to answer. On 03/06/23 at 12:43 PM, an anonymous resident stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, resident council meeting and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food which was palatable and appetizing in appearance. The failed practice had the potential to affect all residents currently receiving nutrition from the facility's kitchen. Resident identifiers: Resident #17, Resident #21, Resident #40, Resident #56 and Resident #5. Facility Census: 65. Findings Included: a) Resident #17 During the initial tour on 03/06/23 at 11:54 AM, Resident # 17 stated the food sucks, I eat the food that my friend brings me. You can not eat the food that is prepared here it is terrible. b) Resident #21 During the initial tour on 03/06/23 at 11:38 AM, Resident # 21 stated the food is bad, I am not offered a substitute if I don't like my meal. I just don't eat it. I have lost weight, because I don't eat. c) Resident #40 During the initial tour 03/06/23 at 11:29 AM, Resident # 40 stated the food is nasty, I am not offered a substitute if I don't like it I just don't eat. d) Resident Identifier #56 Resident interview on 03/06/23 at 12:43 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, resident council meeting and previous minutes from resident council, the facility failed to provide Residents with evening snacks. This had the potential to affect more than a limited numbers of residents living in the facility that could receive snacks from the kitchen. Facility Census: 65. Findings Included: a) Nourishment Rooms During the tour of the Nourishment Room on 400 hall with the Account Manager (AM) on 03/07/23 at 8:13 AM the following snacks were reveled: -three (3) bags of chips left over from last night snack pass -eight (8) half sandwiches -pitches of purple drink, red drink and tea During the tour of the Nourishment Room on 200 hall with the AM on 03/07/23 at 8:18 AM the following snacks were revealed: -1 can of tomato soup -6 half sandwiches -a pitcher of grape drink During an interview on 03/07/23 at 8:19 AM the Account Manager (AM) stated I deliver the snacks between breakfast and lunch, that is just what is left over from snack pass last night. During an interview on 03/07/23 at 10:14 AM, the AM stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored and prepared in a safe, clean, and sanitary environment. The facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment, kitchen area and ice machine were clean and sanitary in a manner in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility also failed to correctly document temperatures for the dish machine. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen. Facility Census: 65 Findings Included: a) The improper sanitization of kitchen equipment A review of a facility policy titled Equipment with a revised date 09/17 stated (typed a written): Procedures 1. All equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance with manufacture's directions and training materials. 2. All staff members will be properly trained in the cleaning and sanitized after every use. 3. All food contact equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after every use. 4. All non food contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to place residents with active Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) and provide proper hand washing practices during catheter care. Resident identifiers: R#4, #35, #22, #56, #1, and #117. Facility census 65. Findings included: a) Resident #4 While reviewing the line listing provided by the facility Infection Preventionist (IP), it was noted Resident #4 had extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in urine on 12/11/22 and was being treated with antibiotic. Resident #4 was not placed in any type of TBP. aa) Resident #4 During an observation of catheter care on 03/07/23 at 1:25 PM, NA #42 provided catheter care for Resident # 4. While performing hand hygiene NA #42 failed to use a paper towel to turn off the sink. The above was also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so the facility is free of rodents. This was a random opportunity for discovery. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents currently receiving nourishment from the facility's kitchen. Facility Census: 65. Findings Included: a) Kitchen Tour An initial tour of the kitchen with the Account Manager(AM) #77 beginning on 03/06/23 at 10:31 AM, revealed the following: - A sticky mouse trap with a piece of fudge cake was found in the dry storage area. - A sticky mouse trap with a piece of fudge cake was found beside an upright cooler. The AM stated, we have mice in the building, I just put the new sticky traps out this morning with fresh fudge cakes. - A shelf about the stove had small black rodent pellets. b) Staff Interviews During an interview on 03/06/23 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator stated we did have a mice issue, we have had the exterminator here every two weeks and we use the sticky traps. We have not seen any sign of mice in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment for dialysis services for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of dialysis, and for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of discharge, during the long term care survey. Resident Identifiers: #5 and #62. Census 65. Findings Included: a) Resident #5 On 03/06/23 an electronic record review found the quarterly MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/09/23, section O, letter J, Dialysis was marked No, indicating the resident did not receive dialysis. The electronic record contained a physician's order for dialysis dated March 2021. On 03/06/23 at 1:05 PM, the resident said he has been receiving dialysis for years, including February of 2023. Staff interviews on 03/07/23 at 8:39 AM, with the minimum data set coordinators (#46 and #31), confirmed the MDS with the ARD of 02/09/23 was marked incorrectly on section O, letter J,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a new Pre admission Screening And Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident with a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for the category of PASARR, during the long term care survey. Resident identifier #5. Census 65. Findings Included: a) Resident #5 On 03/07/23 the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide the most recent PASARR for Resident #5. The DON presented a PASARR for resident #5, dated 09/10/10. The review of this PASARR, section III MI/MR (Mental Illness / Mental Retardation) Assessment, #30 Current Diagnosis, letter n. Other related conditions (Specify:), was answered, Adjustment Disorder. All other choices on this section were not checked. On 03/07/23 at 10:48 AM an electronic medical record review, finds the resident was diagnosed with the following diagnosis on the following dates: Major Depressive Disorder Single Episode on 02/02/11 Anxiety Disorder on 07/11/11 Psychotic Disorder with Hallucinations due to known Psychological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer care and treatments consistent with the professional standards of care for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for the care area of pressure ulcers during the long term care survey process. Resident identifier: #1. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Resident #25 Record review found the resident was readmitted to the facility after a hospital stay on 03/04/23. Review of the progress notes found the following: 03/04/2023 00:32 Nursing Documentation Note General: Patient was admitted /readmitted for the following reason(s): Exacerbation of Respiratory Condition Therapy Infection Management of Diabetes Management of Renal Disease Pain Management readmission The pt. had been hospitalized for greater then 5 days Additional details about this note: Integumentary System reviewed Skin Check completed: resident is experiencing foot pain: Left foot pain- heel protector boot in place No skin injury/wound(s) were noted. On 03/06/23, two days after admission, a nurse completed a skin and wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide catheter care with current professional standards of practice. This was true for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for catheter care. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census 65. Findings included: a) Resident #4 Observation on 03/07/23 at 1:25 PM, found nurse aide (NA) #42 providing catheter care for Resident #4. Observation found there was no anchor device on the resident to secure the Foley catheter and prevent accidental remover and/or tissue damage. NA#42 said she was told at the beginning of her shift Resident #4 needed a secure device. NA #42 cleansed the inside of the vagina and the buttock area. NA #42 failed to cleanse the Foley tubing. While performing hand hygiene NA #42 failed to use a paper towel to turn off the sink. The above was also witnessed by Registered Nurse (RN) #58. RN #58 said she will re-educate NA#42. .

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. This has the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents residing at the facility. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 65. Findings included: a) Observations of the facility On 03/07/23 at 10:00 AM, a tour of the facility with the maintenance supervisor #56 found the corridor leading to the kitchen (accessible to residents, visitors, and staff) had a locked door at the end of the corridor which opened to the outside. The door had missing paint, was scratched, scraped, and had a buildup of grease and grime. The glass in the door was broken with spider web cracks. A ½ inch crack was visible under the door with daylight streaming in from the outside. MS #56 said the door need replaced. A janitor's closet in the hallway found a mop bucket with dirty, gray colored water with a dirty mop still in the bucket. No staff were present. The closet had a drain and tub area in the floor to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$59,233 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $18,782 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
  • $10,023 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
  • $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-07-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GENESIS HEALTHCARE — 184 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.5+1.5 vs chain
The other 183 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alexandria Care CenterLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Bay Crest Care CenterTorrance, CA 1 of 5Bethlehem North Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bethlehem South Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationBethlehem, PA 1 of 5Bridgeville Rehabilitation & Care CenterBridgeville, PA 1 of 5Brightwood CenterFollansbee, WV 1 of 5Carlisle Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterCarlisle, PA 1 of 5Casa De Oro CenterLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Devonshire Care CenterHemet, CA 1 of 5Gettysburg CenterGettysburg, PA 1 of 5Glenwood CenterFlorence, AL 1 of 5Heritage CenterHuntington, WV 1 of 5Hidden Valley CenterOak Hill, WV 1 of 5Inners Creek Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeDallastown, PA 1 of 5Jersey Shore Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CeJersey Shore, PA 1 of 5Kingston Court Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationYork, PA 1 of 5Las Palomas CenterAlbuquerque, NM 1 of 5Lebanon Center, Genesis HealthCareLebanon, NH 1 of 5Lebanon Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLebanon, PA 1 of 5Linden Grove Health Care CenterPuyallup, WA 1 of 5Magnolia RidgeGardendale, AL 1 of 5Marmet CenterMarmet, WV 1 of 5Meridian CenterHigh Point, NC 1 of 5Merry Wood LodgeElmore, AL 1 of 5Mount Olive CenterMount Olive, NC 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Center, Genesis HealthCareFranklin, NH 1 of 5Oak Grove CenterWaterville, ME 1 of 5Oceanside Skilled Nursing And RehabilitationHampton, NH 1 of 5Orchard Park Health Care & Rehab CenterTacoma, WA 1 of 5Parkersburg CenterParkersburg, WV 1 of 5Pembroke CenterPembroke, NC 1 of 5Pine LodgeBeckley, WV 1 of 5Playa Del Rey CenterPlaya del Rey, CA 1 of 5Pocahontas CenterMarlinton, WV 1 of 5Pottstown Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation CentePottstown, PA 1 of 5Putnam CenterHurricane, WV 1 of 5Ridgewood CenterRidgewood, NJ 1 of 5Rio Rancho CenterRio Rancho, NM 1 of 5River City CenterDecatur, AL 1 of 5River Ridge CenterKennebunk, ME

Showing 40 of 183; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GENESIS OPERATIONS V LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/31/2011
FC-GEN OPERATIONS INVESTMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GEN OPERATIONS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GENESIS HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
GENESIS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
GHC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
WHITMAN, ARNOLDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/02/2015
BERG, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/02/2015
BRIDGEFORD, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
MENDELSON, AVIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2024
LARSON, ANTHONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2024
ZAFAR, SAADIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$603K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 5%Other / private 10%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $603K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$414per resident / day
operating cost
$12,582per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$418per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WV

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the West Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in West Virginia
$12,836/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,262/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,340/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 515100. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next