No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Alhambra Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP

415 South Garfield, Alhambra, CA 91801 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (626) 282-3151 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$17,388 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $17,388 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-05)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
333 S Garfield Ave · (626) 289-7333 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
507 S Stoneman Ave Ste F · (626) 626-3942 · Call to confirm hours
Park
600 S Almansor St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
510 S Stoneman Ave · (626) 284-7972

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication3.6%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.8%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.7%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.2%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.492.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.411.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 176 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.64U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.33hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.7%CMS range 30.5–45.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.0–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 5.3–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.741.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
1.21
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.57
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 93.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-26)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) was provided with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR-a lifesaving emergency procedure for a victim who has signs of cardiac arrest [a situation when a victim becomes unresponsive, no normal breathing, and no pulse]), in accordance with the standard of practice on basic life support and the facility's cardiopulmonary resuscitation policy by failing to: 1. Ensure facility staff immediately start CPR when Resident 1 was found unresponsive (no movement or response to stimuli and no pulse or respirations). Instead, Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) walked to the nurses' station, which was about 30 feet away from the resident to check on the resident's code status (type of emergent treatment a resident would or would not receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) before starting CPR. 2. Ensure facility staff immediately start CPR when Resident 1 was found unresponsive. Instead, Resident 1 was moved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to give mechanical soft texture (food item that has been blended, mashed, mixed, or processed into a smooth and uniform texture) diet for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's policy on nutrition management of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) by facility staff failing to : 1. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) did not instruct Uncertified Assistive Personnel 1 (UAP 1) to obtain a sandwich from the facility's refrigerator for Resident 1 to consume on 4/17/24. 2. Verify Resident 1's diet order for the resident to receive no added salt (NAS, food is seasoned as regular food), consistent or controlled carbohydrate (one of several substances such as sugar or starch that provide the body with energy) diet (CCHO, a restrictive diet that involves eating the same numbers of carbohydrate daily) mechanical soft texture, nectar thick consistency (easily pourable and are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete record for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential for delayed or unnecessary treatment which could negatively affect the overall wellbeing of Resident 1. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included cardiovascular accident (CVA, commonly known as a stroke, a loss of blood flow to part of the brain, which damages brain tissue caused by blood clots and broken blood vessels in the brain), major depressive disorder (or also called clinical depression, it affects how you feel, think and behave and can lead to a variety of emotional and physical problems), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of two sampled residents (Resident 23 and 59) were treated with respect and dignity in accordance with the facility policy by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 23's clothes were clean and free of food particles. 2. Resident 59 was called by preferred name. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the residents' self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 23's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 4/22/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognitive (the ability to understand and make decisions)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement proper gastrostomy tube (GT - a tube that is surgically inserted into the resident's stomach to allow access for food, fluids, and medications) practices and procedures for two of three sampled residents (Residents 61 and 69) by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 69's head of bed was elevated at least 30 degrees while receiving enteral feeding (a method of providing nutrition directly to the gastrointestinal tract when a person cannot eat by mouth) in accordance with the facility's policy and physician's order. 2. The GT feeding was connected to Resident 61, allowing all feeding to be given as prescribed by the physician These deficient practices placed Resident 69 at risk for aspiration (accidental inhalation of foreign material [like food, liquid, or stomach contents] into the airways and lungs) and had the potential to place Resident 61 to receive an incorrect total feeding amount received in a day that can lead to malnutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 61's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness one side of the body), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 61's Order Listing Report, revised 3/26/2025, the Order Listing Report indicated an order to swab/suction every shift as appropriate. During a review of Resident 61's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 61 had moderately impaired cognitive skills (ability to understand and make decisions) for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 61 was dependent (helper does all effort needed to complete activity) with toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired vegetables stored in the facility kitchen's refrigerator during a kitchen observation conducted on 6/23/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/23/2025 at 8:10 AM with Dietary Aide (DA) 2, the following foods were found in the kitchen's refrigerator: lettuce with expiration date 6/21/2025, cilantro with expiration date 6/19/2025, parsley with expiration date 6/19/2025 and cucumbers with expiration date 6/22/2025. DA 2 stated that the vegetables are expired and residents can get sick if they eat expired food. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/25/2025 at 9:16 AM with Registered Dietitian (RD) the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Storage and Handling dated 6/4/2024 was reviewed. The P&P indicated that fresh vegetables should be checked and sorted for ripeness and should be labeled and dated. RD stated that the labels on the vegetables found in the kitchen's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage properly in the facility's garbage disposal area during kitchen observation conducted on 6/23/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to attract pests and spread disease. Findings: During an observation on 6/23/2025 at 8:26 AM, the facility's trash was observed with trash bins overflowing with trash, trash bins with lids that were not completely closed, trash bags on the floor, a hamper used as a trash can and uncovered trash cans. During a concurrent interview and observation on 6/23/2025 at 8:31 AM with Dietary Aide (DA) 1, the facility's garbage disposal area was observed. DA 1 stated that trash bags should not be on the floor, trash should be covered, and hampers should not be used as a trash can. DA 1 stated that animals can get into the trash if it's not covered and they may spread disease. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/25/2025 at 9:12 AM with Dietary Supervisor (DS) the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Waste Management dated 4/21/2022 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of exposure to COVID and bullous pemphigoid (a chronic autoimmune skin disorder characterized by itchy, blistering skin lesions, most commonly affecting older adults). During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 4/8/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognitive (the ability to understand and make decisions) skills for daily decision making. The MDS also indicated Resident 38 was dependent (Helper does all of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity or the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity) with putting on/taking off footwear The MDS also indicated Resident 38 required substantial/maximal assistance (Helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its protocol for Antibiotic (medication used to kill bacteria and to treat infections) Stewardship Program by failing to complete the Surveillance Data Collection form prior to the administration of antibiotic therapy for three (3) of 3 sampled residents (Residents 34, 35, and 88). This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 34, 35, and 88 to be prescribed inappropriate antibiotics and increased the risk for developing antibiotic-resistant organisms (bacteria that are not controlled or killed by antibiotics) and suffer adverse side effects from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 34's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection) and contact dermatitis (inflammation of the skin by external agent). During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs for one (1) of 21 sampled residents by failing to ensure Resident 17's Low Air Loss (LAL, operates using a blower based pump that is designed to circulate a constant flow of air through the mattress, commonly used to heal pressure ulcers[wound that occurs as a result of prolonged pressure on a specific area of the body]) mattress was at comfort level per physician's order. This deficient practice has the potential for skin issues and complications of immobility. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis of scoliosis (a condition where the spine curves sideways, resembling an S or C shape, rather than a straight line), deformity of chest and rib, and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 17's Physicians Order, dated 2/16/2024, the Physicians Order indicated LAL Mattress for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 61), as indicated the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure resulted in an unclean environment and accident hazard for Resident 61, other residents, and facility staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 61's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 61's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 5/15/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 61 had moderately impaired cognitive skills (ability to understand and make decisions) for daily decision making.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 61), was provided Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting performed daily) care. On 6/24/2025, Resident 61 was observed in bed with brown residue on right inner thigh and brown smear on the outside and top of the incontinent brief (a disposable diaper used for adults). This failure had the potential for Resident 61 to experience skin breakdown and/or discomfort. Findings: During a review of Resident 61's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness one side of the body), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the fluid restriction (a dietary change that limits the amount of liquid a person can consume in a day) as indicated on the physician order for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 12), who was receiving dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney/s have failed) treatment. This deficient practice has the potential for fluid overload (a condition where there is too much fluid in the body which could result in swelling, particularly in the ankles and legs, and shortness of breath and health complications) for Resident 12. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of end stage renal disease (irreversible kidney failure) and generalized edema (swollen throughout the body due to fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer a scheduled medication on time for one (1) of 21 sampled residents (Resident 35) per physician's order, in accordance with the facility's Medication Administration policy and procedure (P&P). This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 35's medical condition to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body) and dizziness (a sensation of unsteadiness, lightheadedness, or spinning). During a review of Resident 35's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) dated 4/16/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was assessed to have intact cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decision making and was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review of the facility menu, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two sampled residents (Resident 17) was provided with a therapeutic (food that does not require much chewing and are soft on the mouth) diet (dysphagia [difficulty swallowing] mechanical soft diet) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 17 not to receive proper nutrition and experience weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition (serious condition that occurs when a resident's diet does not contain the right amount of nutrients) and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 5/16/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive (the ability to understand and make decisions)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy by not checking the food brought in by family members for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 73). This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 73 to choke (severe difficulty in breathing because of a constricted or obstructed throat or a lack of air) and aspirate (when food, liquid, or other material enters a resident's airway and eventually the lungs by accident) on food which can lead to death. Findings: During a review of Resident 73's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hyperlipidemia (abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids [fat particles] in the blood), and adult failure to thrive(a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a toileting schedule (timed voiding) for three (3) of 3 sampled residents (Resident 40, 16, and 82), who were assessed as candidates on the bowel and bladder (B&B) program screener (an assessment of the bowel and bladder to see if residents are candidates to join a scheduled toileting) as indicated on the facility policy and procedure. This deficient practice has the potential for Residents 40, 16, and 82 to become incontinent (loss of bowel and bladder control). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 40's admission Record indicated resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of muscle weakness and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident 40's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/17/2024, indicated resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized screening and assessment tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care services for four (4) of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2, 49, 63, and 641) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. 1. For Resident 2, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen via nasal cannula (a medical device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy to people who have lower oxygen levels) was administered according to physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 not being able to receive the benefits of the supplemental oxygen ordered if the oxygen tubing is not in an optimal working condition. 2. For Resident 2 and 49, the facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula was placed in a clean plastic bag when not in use. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to develop a respiratory infection. 3. Resident 641's oxygen nasal cannula (NC; a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) and water container for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure by failing to ensure: 1. A container of rice was sealed properly. 2. A container of brown sugar was sealed properly. 3. A can opener was clean and free of gunk (unpleasantly sticky or messy substance) and rust (a reddish-brown substance that forms on the surface of iron and steel as a result of reacting with air and water). These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever, which can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: During an observation in the facility's kitchen on 6/25/2024 at 7:49 PM, the following were observed: 1. A clear plastic container of rice storage was not sealed properly. 2. A clear plastic container of brown sugar was not sealed. 3. A can opener was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices by failing to: 1. Change gloves while providing incontinence (inability to control bowel and bladder function) care for Resident 40. This deficient practice had the potential to spread infection to staff and residents. 2. Implement water sample (to collect and deliver for analysis a sample of water representative of the bulk of water being examined) testing to validate the facility's water water management program control measures (actions that can be taken to reduce the potential of exposure to a hazard) initially or on an ongoing basis to ensure the facility's water was free of waterborne (carried or transmitted by water and especially by drinking water) pathogens (any organism that can cause disease) such as legionella (a bacterium which cases legionnaires' disease [a severe form of pneumonia - lung inflammation usually caused by infection]). This failure had the potential to place the residents in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an appropriate call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a resident in need) according to the resident's condition and to have the call light within reach for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential to delay in the necessary care and services for Resident 5. Findings: A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated resident was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of muscle weakness and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time). A review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/11/2022, indicated Resident 40 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 5's Care Plan with focus on potential for injury, revised 12/20/2022, indicated to keep call light within reach. A review of Resident 5's Care Plan with focus on risk for falls, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a current copy of the resident's advanced directive (a legal document that provide instructions for medical care and only go into effect if the resident cannot communicate his/her wishes) in the resident's medical record for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 46). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 46 to not have her wishes met regarding life-sustaining treatment (any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical condition). Findings: A review of Resident 46's admission Record indicated resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of malignant neoplasm (also known as cancer; a disease in which abnormal cells divide uncontrollably and destroy body tissue) of left lower limb and immunodeficiency (immune systems ability to fight infectious diseases and cancer is compromised or entirely absent). A review of Resident 46's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY (Cross reference F686) Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was initiated for one (1) of 20 sampled residents (Resident 26). This deficient practice resulted in the delayed care and services for Resident 26's pressure injury (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). Findings: A review of Resident 26's admission Record indicated resident was a admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of muscle weakness and osteoporosis (a bone disease that develops when bone mineral density and bone mass decreases, or when the structure and strength of bones changes) A review of Resident 26's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/13/2023, indicated resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized care screening and assessment tool), dated 6/8/2024, indicated resident was severely impaired in cognitive (the functions your brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised for one (1) of 20 sampled residents (Resident 5) This deficient practice had the potential to inadequately care for resident's needs, resulting in a decline in Resident 5's functionality. Findings: A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of muscle weakness and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time). A review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/11/2022, indicated Resident 40 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 5's Occupational Therapy (OT, a form of therapy for those recuperating from physical or mental illness that encourages rehabilitation through the performance of activities required in daily life) titled Occupational Therapy - OT Evaluation & Plan of Treatment, dated 8/30/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 20 sampled residents (Residents 643 and 10) were provided one to one (1:1, one staff to one resident) feeding assistance as ordered. This failure had the potential to put Residents 643 and 10 at risk for weight loss and aspiration (accidentally inhaling a foreign object, food or liquid through the vocal cords into the airway). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 643's admission Record, indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of displaced intertrochanteric (between the trochanters [bony protrusions on the femur - thighbone]) fracture (as partial or complete break in the bone) of the left femur and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) oropharyngeal phase (starting in the mouth and/or the throat). A review of Resident 643's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 4/4/2024, indicated the resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY (Cross reference F656) Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 26) was given appropriate treatment for a Stage 2 (the skin breaks open; it can look like an abrasion, blister, or a shallow crater of the skin) Pressure injury (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 26's pressure injury progressing from a Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD, inflammation or skin erosion caused by prolonged exposure to a source of moisture such as urine stool, sweat, wound drainage, saliva, or mucus) wound, to a stage 2 pressure injury. Findings: A review of Resident 26's admission Record indicated the resident was a admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of muscle weakness and osteoporosis (a bone disease that develops when bone mineral density and bone mass decreases, or when the structure and strength of bones changes) A review of Resident 26's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 5 (five) sampled residents (Resident 54) had sufficient supply of gabapentin (nerve pain medication) to administer in accordance with the physician's order and facility's policy and procedure. These deficient practices resulted to a delay in the administration of the medication and had the potential to create medication - related adverse consequences such as unrelieved nerve pains to Resident 54. Findings: A review of Resident 54's admission Record indicated Resident 54 was admitted on [DATE] with type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar by either the body does not produce enough insulin, or it resists insulin) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes which can affect nerves that supply feeling and movement in the arms and legs). A review of the Physician's Order, dated 11/14/2022, timed at 3:57 PM indicated to administer gabapentin capsule 100…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its Medication Storage policy by failing to: 1. Refrigerate Residents 48's unused Novolin R Flex Pen (form of insulin, a naturally occurring hormone, used to control blood sugar in patients with diabetes). 2. Refrigerate Residents 59's unused Basaglar Kwik Pen (is a long-acting insulin that helps lower high blood sugar levels). This deficient practice increased the risk for Residents 48 and 59 to receive insulin that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage possibly leading to health complications, which may result to harm and hospitalization. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation of Medication Cart 3 in Station 2 and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4) on 6/28/2024 at 2:35 PM, Residents 48's Novolin R Flex Pen was observed in Medication Cart 3. LVN 4 stated a green sticker on Residents 48's Novolin R Flex Pen indicated the medication needs to be refrigerated. LVN 4 also stated Residents 48's unused Novolin R Flex Pen was not and was supposed to be in the refrigerator.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent fall () for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1), assessed as high risk for falls when Resident 1 was not provided assistance when getting up from the bed to go to the bathroom and failing to initiate a fall care plan (a document created for a resident receiving healthcare, personal care, or other forms of support) , as indicated on the facility policy and procedure. This deficient practice resulted to Resident 1 ' s fall on 5/19/2024 and transfer to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH 1). Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/9/2024 with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, history of falling, and abnormality of gait and stability. A review of Resident 1 ' s Fall Risk Evaluation, dated 5/9/2024 indicated Resident 1 ' s score was 11 which indicated high risk of fall. Resident 1 ' s risk factors included were history of falls in the past 3 months, change of condition in the last 14 days, and balance problem while walking.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the doctor for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1), of Resident 1's change in condition of a decreased oxygen saturation (the amount of oxygen carried by red blood cells) of 78% (a normal level is between 95% and 100%) once identified as indicated in facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to result in delayed treatment and provision of services for Resident 1, negatively affecting the resident's health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted at the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include pneumonia (PNA- inflammation of the lungs due to a bacterial or viral infection, acute respiratory failure(a sudden condition in which not enough oxygen passes from the lungs into the blood), moderate persistent asthma (a respiratory disorder characterized by inflamed airways and difficulty breathing), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 1), had an active doctor's order for oxygen (O2) therapy (helps people with lung diseases or breathing problems get the oxygen their bodies need to function) administration and an indication (the condition that leads to the requirement of a treatment) for oxygen use, before and during oxygen administration. This failure placed resident at risk for inadequate oxygen with the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted at the facility on 1/14/2024 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include pneumonia (PNA- inflammation of the lungs due to a bacterial or viral infection, acute respiratory failure(a sudden condition in which not enough oxygen passes from the lungs into the blood), moderate persistent asthma (a respiratory disorder characterized by inflamed airways and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), who was assessed at risk for falls as indicated in the resident's Fall Risk Evaluation. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to incur avoidable falls while in the facility and sustain injury from falls. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (impaired ability to remember, think or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and depression (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities causing significant impairment of daily life). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical, dated 11/29/23, indicated the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS; a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a diagnosis of dementia and severely impaired with cognition (thought process) was provided with adequate supervision, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure on Resident Safety. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility on 12/9/2023 from 12:50 PM to 1:21 PM (approximately 30 minutes), when the resident was left unsupervised while sitting on the wheelchair and was allowed to get out of the facility's backdoor. Resident 1 was found on the same day, 12/9/2023 after a police officer notified the facility to report that Resident 1 was brought by the Fire Department to the acute hospital. Resident 1 was readmitted back to the facility on [DATE] at 5:10 PM. Resident 1 sustained an abrasion to the forehead. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (impaired ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for one of 19 sampled residents (Residents 9) as ordered by the physician. Resident 9, who was at risk for falls, had an order for floor mats at the bedside and to wear a soft helmet at all times, which were not implemented as ordered. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive treatment/services as ordered. Findings: A review of Resident 9's Face Sheet (a record of admission) indicated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included abnormality of gait and mobility (difficulty walking, an abnormal pattern of walking). A review of Resident 9's a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/15/21, indicated the resident usually made self-understood and usually understood others, and had severe cognitive impairment (having trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions that affect their everyday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Residents 17 and 45) with an indwelling catheter (an indwelling catheter collects urine by attaching to a drainage bag) received the appropriate care and services to prevent infection. Residents 17 and 45 had cloudy color urine with sediments (solid matter left after the urine has been allowed to stand for some time). The nursing staff failed to monitor the resident's urine and report the abnormal findings immediately to the residents' physicians. This deficient practiced placed the residents at risk for developing a urinary tract infection (UTI, a very common type of infection in your urine/bladder) and potential for a delay in receiving care and treatment. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 17's Face Sheet (a record of admission) indicated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (loss of control to urinate caused by a problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper respiratory care for three of seven sampled residents (Residents 366, 64, and 34). 1. Resident 366 was observed receiving oxygen at a rate of 3 to 3.5 liters per minute (LPM) on separate occasions. The physician's order was 2 LPM. The tube of the oxygen was not labeled with the date of replacement. 2. Resident 34's oxygen tubing did not have a label. 3. Resident 64's oxygen tubing did not have a label. These deficient practices had the potential to harm by receiving too much oxygen and expose the residents to infection by not having the tubing labeled when it was chnaged last. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/8/21 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 366 was observed receiving oxygen at 3.5 LPM via nasal cannula (NC, a tubing used to deliver oxygen via the nose) while she was lying in bed. The NC tubing did not have a label to indicate when it was last changed. During an observation and interview with a Licensed Vocational Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document the administration of controlled medications (medications that could cause physical and mental dependence, and had restrictions on how they could be filled and refilled) for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 50 and 61) on the residents' Medication Administration Record (MAR). During an inspection of the controlled substance in the medication carts for Stations 1 and 2, the following were identified: 1. Resident 50, who was ordered Acetaminophen-hydrocodone (a controlled substance used to treat moderate to severe pain) 5-325 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth (PO) every 6 hours (hrs.) as needed (PRN) for severe pain (7 to 9, pain scale out of 10, 10 being the highest level of pain), received Acetaminophen-hydrocodone on 6/2/21 and 6/3/21 and was not documented on the resident's MAR. 2. Resident 61, who was ordered Tramadol HCL (controlled substance used to treat moderate to severe pain) 50 mg one tablet PO every 6 hrs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had 25 opportunities of medication administration observed and three of the 25 medications were not administered in accordance with physician's orders, resulting in a medication error rate of 12 percent (%). The errors consisted of the following during a medication pass observation on 6/9/21 with Resident 39: 1. Vitamin B6 (a nutritional supplement to help the immune system) was not given. 2. Pepcid (a medicine used to treat increased acid in the stomach) was not given. 3. The gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube surgically inserted into the stomach to deliver fluids and medications) was not flushed with 30 milliliters (mL) of water after all medications were administered. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to have a lower immune system and stomach irritation from missed doses of medication and had the potential for the resident's G-tube to get clogged and have complications from failing to flush the G-tube as ordered after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and store drugs according to accepted professional standards, which included the removal of expired medications and separation of oral from external medications in the storage areas. The following were observed: 1. Expired medications/nutritional supplements and expired needles observed on the shelves of the medication storage room and multi-dose medications did not have a label with an open date. 2. The medication cart in nursing station 2 had six medications with no open date and one suppository (medication administered through the buttocks) medication stored with oral medications. These deficient practices had the potential to compromise the safety and well-being of the residents. Findings: 1. During an observation of the facility's medication storage room on 6/10/21 at 8:30 a.m., the following were observed: a. Two (2) bottles of Total B with C vitamin (a nutritional supplement) expired on 4/2021, b. A bottle of saline nasal spray (a simple saltwater solution used to prevent dryness and help with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food storage and preparation by failing to ensure the following: 1. Dietary staff did not perform handwashing after touching dirty utensils and picking up a clean pan. 2. Food products were not labeled. 3. Staff did not perform handwashing or change gloves after touching face mask while preparing residents' food. 4. The refrigerator temperature was not kept at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below. 5. Dietary staff did not know how to calibrate the food thermometer. 6. Food in the walk-in refrigerator was not kept at or below 41 degrees F. 7. Dietary staff did not wear gloves while preparing foods. These deficient practices had the potential to decrease food quality, cause food contamination, and foodborne illnesses due to unsafe food handling practices. Findings: An initial tour of the kitchen with [NAME] 1 was conducted, on 6/8/21 at 8:20 a.m., the following were observed: 1. On 6/8/21 at 8:20 a.m., during an observation and interview, a Dishwasher 1 was observed handling dirty utensils.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were kept safe and secured from unauthorized use. During an observation, the facility stored their residents' medical records in the basement and it did not have a lock to keep it secured. This deficient practice had the potential for violating residents' rights to confidentiality of personal records. Findings: During an initial tour of the facility with the Maintenance Director (MD), on 6/11/21 at 10:15 a.m., residents' medical records (dated from 2018 to 2020) were stored inside the facility's gated basement storage room. The gate was not locked. There were residents' medical records stored inside white cardboard boxes (60 boxes) with lids placed on shelves located by the wall and 40 boxes on pallets by the gate. Each box had a label on the outside with the resident's name and dates (ranging from July 2018 to February 10, 2020). During an interview, on 6/11/21 at 10:20 a.m., the MD stated he had a key to open the basement door. The MD stated he broke the lock that was on the gated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and implement its Infection Control Program to prevent the transmission of disease and infection as followed: 1. Residents 13 and 45 had hand held nebulizers (HHN, an inhalation machine connected to a plastic tubing attached to a mouthpiece or face mask used to administer treatment for breathing illnesses) with the mouthpiece and mask exposed and were not stored in a sealed or closed container. This deficient practice had the potential to result in oral and respiratory infections from the use of a soiled mouthpiece or face mask. 2. Resident 9 had a the nasal cannula (NC, a device made of plastic inserted into the nostril used to deliver supplemental oxygen or airflow to a patient or person in need of respiratory help) that was observed on the floor. This deficient practice put the resident at risk of acquiring potentially hazardous bacteria from the oxygen tubing. 3. Resident 17, who had an indwelling catheter (a tubing inserted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have a functioning call light system for two out of 47 resident bedrooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]). This deficient practice had the potential to prevent the residents from receiving assistance for all needs in a prompt and timely manner. Findings: During an observation on 6/8/21 at 11:55 a.m., the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] was pressed and the call light indicator inside the room lit up. No staff entered the room to answer the call light for seven minutes. During an observation on 6/8/21 at 12:02 p.m., the Director of Nurses (DON) observed that the call light indicator inside room [ROOM NUMBER] was on. The DON stated that the call light indicator above the door outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was not lit and the call light indicator at the nursing station for room [ROOM NUMBER] was also not lit. The DON stated the call light system in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not working because the facility staff were not aware the resident inside room [ROOM NUMBER]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 64) had an informed consent for Trazodone (psychotropic drug, antidepressant medicine that works to balance chemicals in the brain). This deficient practice violated the resident's right to make an informed decision to take the medication. Findings: A review of Resident 64's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated Resident 64 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) and atrophy (wasting away). A review of Resident 64's physician's order, dated 5/20/21, indicated an order for Trazodone 300 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth (PO) every bedtime (QHS) for depression manifested by (m/b) inability to sleep. On 6/10/21 at 9:23 a.m., during an observation and concurrent interview, Resident 64 was sitting on his wheelchair watching…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide printed activities material for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 43) in the resident's primary language (Chinese). The in-room monthly activities calendar and the large hallway monthly activities calendar were only offered in the English language. The failure had the potential to minimize Resident 43's participation in facility activities because the resident did not understand and was not aware of activities provided each day. Findings: A review of Resident 43's Face Sheet (a record of admission) indicated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included hemiplegia (weakness to one side of the body) affecting left non dominant side. A review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 5/15/21, indicated the resident had no impairment in cognition (mental processes involved in gaining knowledge and comprehension, includes thinking, knowing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the functional limitations (Section G) in the joint range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) on the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) for one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 43). This deficient practice had the potential to cause inaccurate care planning and inadequate provision of rehabilitation and restorative nursing aide (RNA) program (nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) services for Resident 43. Findings: A review of Resident 43's face sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility 9/1/18 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (weakness to one side of the body) affecting left non dominant side and stiffness of left hand. A review of Resident 43's (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident's cognition (mental processes involved in gaining knowledge and comprehension, includes thinking, knowing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 27) was assisted with activities of daily living (ADLs, such as transferring, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to decline in ADLs and develop contractures (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: A review of Resident 27's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included abnormality of gait (walking), type 2 diabetes mellitus (uncontrolled blood sugar levels), anxiety disorder, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Resident 27 was admitted for orthopedic aftercare (care to bones after an injury or a healing fracture). A review Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 1/12/21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatments and services to prevent development of a joint contracture (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) in the right knee for one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 49). Physical Therapy (PT) staff identified Resident 49 as high risk for developing contractures. Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA, nursing aide program that help residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) treatment was ordered for passive range of motion (PROM, movement at a given joint with full assistance from another person) exercises three times a week instead of five or seven times a week. This failure resulted in development of Resident 49's right knee contracture, requiring further skilled physical therapy services and the resident's need of a right knee splint (rigid material or apparatus used to support and immobilize a broken bone or impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post a No Smoking sign for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 366) who was using oxygen. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the safety of the residents. Findings: During an observation on 6/8/21 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 366 was receiving oxygen at 3.5 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC, a tubing used to deliver oxygen via the nose) while she was lying in bed. Resident 366 did not have a No Smoking sign posted inside or outside the room. During a subsequent interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse 5 (LVN 5), she stated that the No Smoking sign should be posted whenever oxygen was in use. She immediately posted the sign after the interview. A review of Resident 366's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 06/05/21 with diagnoses that included pleural effusion (water in the lungs), pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs), and acute respiratory failure (occurs when fluid builds up in the air sacs of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving, and other thinking abilities that could interfere with daily life) plan of care that included non-pharmacological interventions prior to administering medications to control behaviors for one resident (Resident 13). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to be over medicated/sedated and affect activities of daily living (ADLs, such as transferring, dressing, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene). Findings: During an observation on 6/8/21 at 8:30 a.m., Resident 13 was observed lying in bed awake with confusion. The resident was quiet and calm. During an interview on 6/8/21 at 10 a.m., Resident 13 stated she did not have any behaviors of striking out or throwing items at staff or thinking that her roommate wanted to hurt her. During an interview on 6/8/21 at 11:45 a.m., a Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1) stated that he never saw…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 8), who was receiving psychotropic (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medications, was free from unnecessary drugs. Resident 8 was administered Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication used to treat mood disorders) 25 milligrams (mg) without an attempt for a gradual dose reduction (GDR). This deficient practice had the potential to result in significant adverse consequences from possible excessive doses, unnecessary medications, and prolonged use of a psychoactive medication. Findings: A review of Resident 8's Face Sheet (a record of admission) initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included a stroke (when the blood supply to part of your brain is interrupted or reduced, preventing brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients) with right sided weakness, dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), and schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 47 rooms (map diagram labeled rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], separated by a wall in the middle with two [2] beds on 1 side and three [3] beds on the other side with only 1 door for entry and exit) did not have more than four (4) residents in one shared room. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the residents in these rooms not to have enough privacy and had the potential to affect residents' delivery of care. Findings: During a review of the facility's room waiver (a legal document which allowed to give up certain legal rights or claims), dated 6/23/2025, the waiver indicated there was enough space for each resident in the room, nursing and the health and safety of the residents occupying these rooms. The room waiver indicated the two rooms were separated by a brick wall and the entry way to and from rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was through a common door into the hallway. During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 47 rooms (map diagram labeled rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], separated by a wall in the middle with two [2] beds on 1 side and three [3] beds on the other side with only 1 door for entry and exit) did not have more than four (4) residents in one shared room. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the residents in these rooms not to have enough privacy and also had the potential to affect residents' delivery of care. Findings: During an observation on 6/25/2024 at 9:10 AM, rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was observed separated by a wall in the middle, with 2 beds on 1 side and 3 beds on the other side with only 1 door for entry and exit, did not meet the requirement to have no more than four residents to a room. The residents in these rooms were able to ambulate freely and/or maneuver in their walker freely. The Nursing staff had enough space to provide care to these residents with dignity and privacy. There was space for beds,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2021-06-11 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 47 rooms (map diagram labeled rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) did not have more than four residents in one shared room. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the residents in these rooms not to have enough privacy. Findings: During the initial observation on 6/8/21 from 8 a.m. to 10 a.m., rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] (a room separated by a wall in the middle, so that two beds were on one side and three beds were on the other side with one door for entry and exit) did not meet the requirement to have no more than four residents to a room. The residents in these rooms were able to ambulate freely and/or maneuver in their wheelchairs freely. Nursing staff had enough space to provide care to these residents with dignity and privacy. There was space for beds, side tables, dressers, and other medical equipment. During an interview on 6/8/21 at 9:10 am, the Administrator (ADM) stated he would submit a room wavier for this shared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,388 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $17,388 — penalty dated 2024-04-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Creek Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Coral Cove Post AcuteLong Beach, CA 1 of 5East Terrace Rehabilitation & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Four Seasons Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Hawthorne Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPHawthorne, CA 1 of 5Los Feliz Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Mar Vista Country Villa Healthcare & WellnessLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Oakwood Healthcare CenterChico, CA 1 of 5Pioneers Memorial Skilled Nursing CenterBrawley, CA 1 of 5Plaza Healthcare CenterSanta Ana, CA 2 of 5Anaheim PointAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Bay Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Chico Terrace Care CenterChico, CA 2 of 5Claremont Heights Post AcuteClaremont, CA 2 of 5Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Fortuna Rehabilitation And Wellness Center, LPFortuna, CA 2 of 5Granada Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Montecito Heights Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Pasadena Park Healthcare And Wellness CenterPasadena, CA 2 of 5San Rafael Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPSan Rafael, CA 2 of 5Tulare Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPTulare, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post Acute CareLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5York Healthcare & Wellness CentreLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Bay Marina Post AcuteOakland, CA 3 of 5Monterey Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRosemead, CA 3 of 5Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPOntario, CA 3 of 5Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Pavilion On Pico Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Princeton Manor Healthcare Center, LLCOakland, CA 3 of 5Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 4 of 5Ivy Creek Healthcare & Wellness CentreSan Gabriel, CA 4 of 5Kings Healthcare & Wellness Center LPHanford, CA 4 of 5Pine Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPSan Gabriel, CA 4 of 5River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRedding, CA 4 of 5West Hollywood Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPVisalia, CA 5 of 5North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPFresno, CA 5 of 5Oxnard Manor Healthcare CenterOxnard, CA 5 of 5West Pico Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2012
SANTOS, CLAUDIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2024
YEE, HENRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2015
G4 WELLNESS GP LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2012
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2012
WEISS, JONATHANIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
ERETZ ALHAMBRA PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 25%Other / private 6%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$452per resident / day
operating cost
$13,735per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$461per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055760. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next