Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, LP

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 145 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 39.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.33 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) when medical records were not provided to the responsible party (R/P) for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 1) as requested. This failure resulted in Resident 1's R/P not being provided with Resident 1's medical records. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Durable Power of Attorney (DPA) dated 8/18/12, the DPA indicated, I, (Resident 1).hereby appoint (Family Member 1) .as my attorney-in-fact ( Agent) to exercise the powers and discretions described below.My Agent's powers shall include, but not be limited to, the power to.have access to my healthcare and medical records and statements regarding billing, insurance and payments.During a review of Resident 1's Resident Request for Access to Protected Health Information (RRAPHI) dated 4/13/25, the RRAPHI indicated, (Resident 1).I would like to access and inspect my Protected Health Information (PHI) .I would like the facility to send a copy of my PHI to (FM1).I would like a summary of my requested PHI.Signature (FM 1).During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0620 — isolated
  Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an itemized statement per the admission agreement to one of 18 sampled (Resident 1) residents when requested. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be unaware of services she was being billed for. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's monthly statements dated 5/31/25, 6/20/25, and 7/20/25, the monthly statements did not include an itemized billing.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 10:48 a.m. with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated he had requested an itemized bill from the facility and it had not been provided. During an interview on 8/6/25 at 1:42 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated FM 1 had requested an itemized bill indicating how much Resident 1 was being charged for each service. Administrator stated FM 1 was provided with a generic statement that did not indicate the individual service charge. Facility policy requested and none provided.During a review of the facility's California Standard admission Agreement for Skilled Nursing Facilities and Intermediate Care Facilities (CSAASNFICF)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate care with hospice (specialized form of medical care provided to individuals with terminal illness) for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 1) when a pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) was identified to Resident 1's lower back by hospice, and the facility was unaware. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's pressure ulcer to go untreated and worsen.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Hosp SN Visit (HSV-hospice documentation) dated 5/16/25, the HSV indicated, Integumentary (skin) Status.Wounds 1 lower back pressure ulcer/injury, stage 2-partial thickness skin loss of exposed dermis, observable, most problematic pressure ulcer/injury.cleanse with DWS (dermal wound spray-used to clean wounds) and pat dry. Apply hydrogel (medication used to promote healing) to wound bed and cover with pink Allevyn sacral dressing for extra padding. Change Mondays and Thursdays or PRN soiling/dislodgement.date first identified.5/16/25.During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were used by the discard date, dated when opened, and labeled. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 9:01 a.m. with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the kitchen, there was a large container with brown liquid that was not labeled. CDM stated it was iced tea, and it should be labeled. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 9:03 a.m. with CDM in the kitchen, there were three pitchers of juice with no labels in the refrigerator. CDM stated there should be a label with the date of when the juice was poured into the pitchers. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 9:05 a.m. with CDM in the kitchen, there were opened, unlabeled containers of mayonnaise and ranch dressing in the refrigerator. CDM stated the containers should be labeled with a date when opened. During a concurrent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for two of five sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 6). This failure resulted in Resident 33 and Resident 6 receiving medications unsafely and had the potential for adverse outcomes. Findings: During an observation on 5/15/25 at 8:46 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 in Resident 33's room. LVN 2 administered Lisinopril (used to treat high blood pressure, heart failure, and to improve survival after a heart attack) 5 milligrams (mg), Carvedilol (used to treat heart failure and high blood pressure) 3.125 mg, and Spironalactone (used to treat high blood pressure, heart failure, and fluid retention) 25 mg, by mouth to Resident 33. LVN 2 did not take Resident 33's heart rate or blood pressure before administering the medications. During an observation on 5/15/25 at 8:55 a.m. with LVN 2 in Resident 6's room, LVN 2 administered Amlodipine (used to treat high blood pressure and certain types of chest pain) 5 mg by mouth to Resident 6. LVN 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control standards for two of eight residents (Resident 7 and Resident 21). This failure had the potential to spread illness to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During an observation and interview on 5/13/25 at 9:38 a.m. with Physical Therapist (PT) 1 in hallway, trash cans were not in the rooms and two were noted in the hallway. PT 1 exited Resident 7's isolation room with a soiled isolation gown rolled up in her hands. PT 1 crossed the hallway to dispose of the gown in the hallway trash can. PT 1 stated, There isn't a trash can in the room big enough for soiled personal protective equipment [PPE- gowns, gloves, and masks used to prevent the spread of infection]. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/13/25 at 9:44 a.m. with Hospice Aide (HA), in Resident 21's room, which had transmission-based precautions (TBP-placed for residents who are documented or are suspected of having communicable diseases or infections that can be transmitted to others) signage and a PPE cart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 196), was assisted to the bathroom when she asked for help. This failure resulted in Resident 196 being frustrated and had the potential for increased incontinence (inability to control urination and/or bowel) and decreased mobility. Findings: During an interview on [DATE] at 12:20 p.m. with Resident 196, Resident 196 stated when she came back from her dialysis treatment yesterday, she asked the staff to help her go to the bathroom for a bowel movement. Resident 196 stated the staff told her to wait and poop in her pants and staff will change her afterwards. Resident 196 stated she felt frustrated, and she would have gone to the bathroom if she could. Resident 196 stated she just pooped in her diaper because she could not do anything. During a review of Resident 196's Care Plan Report (CPR), undated, the CPR indicated, Resident 196 was on a B&B (bowel and bladder) management program: Staff to offer and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of the Advance Directive (legal document outlining a person's healthcare and end of life wishes should the person become unable to verbalize those wishes) status was accurate for one of four sampled residents (Resident 10). This failure resulted in an inaccurate medical record and had the potential for Resident 10's healthcare wishes not to be honored. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/14/25 at 10:48 a.m. with Social Services Director (SSD) 1 and SSD 2, Resident 10's medical record was reviewed. SSD 1 stated the Physician's Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated 1/20/20, indicated No Advance Directive. The Social Services Progress Notes dated 1/24/25 indicated, Advance Directive . a. Yes [has an advance directive] on file. SSD 1 stated she was unable to find a copy of Resident 10's advance directive. During a review of the facilities policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Advance Directive dated 7/31/24, the P&P indicated, Advance Directive Information . c. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate a nurse-to-nurse report when transferring a resident to the hospital for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the hospital not having any of Resident 1's medical or surgical history. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/14/25 at 11:12 a.m. with Social Services Director (SSD) 1, Resident 1's Medical Record (MR) was reviewed. SSD 1 stated Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital for labored breathing. The Physician Order dated 4/12/25 at 11 a.m. indicated, send to ED [emergency department] for eval[uation] and treat as needed one time only for labored breathing for 1 Day. The SNF/NF [Skilled Nursing Facility/Nursing Facility] to Hospital Transfer Form (HTF), dated 4/11/25, indicated, the form was completed and reviewed by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4. The HTF indicated, Report Called in By (name/title) was filled in with na [not applicable] and Report Called in to (name/title) was filled in with na. During a concurrent interview and record review on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 196), was administered oxygen according to physician's order. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 196 to experience hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body) or hyperoxia (high level of oxygen in the body). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 10:03 a.m. with Resident 196 in her room, Resident 196's oxygen setting on the oxygen concentrator was 5 LPM (liters per minute). Resident 196 stated it was always at 3 LPM. During an interview on 5/12/25 at 12:41 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated Resident 196's oxygen setting order was 2 LPM. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 12:42 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in the Yellow Hallway, CNA 1 was wheeling Resident 196 with an oxygen tank behind the wheelchair. CNA 1 stated the oxygen was set at 2 LPM. Resident 196 told CNA 1 her oxygen was supposed to be at 3 LPM. During a review of Resident 196's Order Summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $399K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA