Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LP
6400 Purdue Drive, Eureka, CA 95503 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (707) 443-5668 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 23.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 47.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.27 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.45 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.0%CMS range 45.6–58.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.6–13.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 3.3–8.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 38.2 residents a day — about 39% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2022-05-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Record review indicated Resident 146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Fracture of Head and Neck of Left Femur (Thigh bone) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (Prostate gland enlargement), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/03/22 at 10:48 a.m., Resident 146 was observed in bed, in a hospital gown. He stated he had been in a lot of pain for several days. Resident 146 stated the night of 5/02/22, he pressed the call light because he needed pain medicine. Resident 146 stated his pain level was 8 out of 10. Resident 146 stated Unlicensed Staff A responded to the call light, and he requested pain medication. Resident 146 stated Unlicensed Staff A came back and told him the Licensed Nurse (Licensed Nurse B) assigned to him stated he was not due for his pain medication (indicating it was not time for him to receive pain medication). Resident 146 stated no interventions were attempted to relieve his pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of a physician ordered psychological evaluation for one (1 ) of three (3 ) sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure resulted in an 11 month delay in needed mental health services, with potential exacerbation in Resident 1's continued confusion, agitation, and psychological distress.A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a facility demographic) indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression (a serious mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness, emptiness, and a loss of interest in activities), age related cognitive decline (difficulty with thinking, memory, concentration beyond what is typically expected due to aging), and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in communication caused by disrupted brain function, rather than a primary speech or language issue ).A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool to evaluate each resident's physical, mental, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident and the resident's family members were notified and invited to participate in care conferences (a collaborative meeting between a resident, their family, and the healthcare team to discuss the resident's health status, treatment progress, and update or establish a personalized care plan) for one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure the resident and resident's family were given the opportunity to make decisions regarding Resident 1's healthcare goals and treatment.Findings:A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet indicated admission to the facility on 5/21/25 with diagnoses that included Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (a continuous, irregular, and often rapid heartbeat), Cervical Disc Disorders (a variety of neck conditions related to the breakdown of the spinal discs [the cushions between your neck vertebrae]), Bilateral Cystoid Macular Degeneration (an eye condition in which fluid accumulates in the central part of the eye) with blindness in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week for a census of 39.This failure had the potential for residents to have unmet care needs and services.Findings:A review of the facility's third quarter (4/1/25-6/30/25) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, printed on 9/15/25, indicated the facility did not have RN coverage on 4/5/25, 5/16/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25 and 6/20/25.A review of the facility's Daily Staffing Sheet dated 4/5/25, 5/16/25, 5/23/25, 5/26/25 and 6/20/25, indicated no RNs were scheduled.During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 9/24/25 at 1:57 p.m. the ADM confirmed there had been several days when no RN had worked eight consecutive hours and stated it was important to have an RN for the supervision and clinical assessment of residents.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Nursing Department- Staffing, Scheduling & Postings, dated 7/18, the P&P indicated, To ensure than (sic) adequate number of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure person centered, comprehensive care for seven residents (Resident 7, Resident 6, Resident 3, Resident 39, Resident 24, Resident 34, and Resident 10) out of a census of 36 when the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT-a group of healthcare professionals collaborating to develop and implement a resident centered treatment plan) did not plan quarterly care conferences or involve residents and/or Responsible Party (RP, a person or entity responsible for making healthcare decisions).These failures resulted in lost opportunities for the residents to be included in decisions regarding their care, treatment and interventions.Findings: A review of Resident 7's Multidisciplinary Care Conference (MCC), dated 9/10/24, indicated a quarterly care conference was held without Resident 7's RP present. A further review of Resident 7's medical chart indicated Resident 7 had no quarterly care conference held for the 4th quarter of 2024. A review of Resident 6's MCC, dated 10/23/24, indicated a quarterly care conference was held without Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate reconciliation, accountability and disposition (the process of returning and/or destroying unused medications) of controlled medications (medications with high potential for abuse or addiction) and medication administration for a census of 39 residents when:Random controlled medication audits for two residents (Resident 20, and Resident 36) did not reconcile. The medications were signed out of Individual Narcotic Record (INR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents; and,The Controlled Substance Disposition Log was not provided for medications that were destroyed on 7/17/25 and 8/21/25.These failures resulted in the facility not having an accurate accountability of controlled substances and increased the potential for diversion.Findings:1.The controlled medication record for two random residents (Resident 20 and Resident 36) who received as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to protect the health of nine residents (Resident 37, Resident 38, Resident 35, Resident 3, Resident 14, Resident 34, Resident 1, Resident 21 and Resident 22) out of a census of 36 residents when:1. Hand hygiene was not performed prior to dining; and,2. Toilet plungers were placed directly on resident bathroom floors without being in receptacles.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent resident illness.Findings: 1. During an observation on 9/22/25 at 1:03 p.m. in Resident 37's room, Resident 37 was provided with his lunch tray without offering hand hygiene prior. There was no hand wipes were noted on Resident 37's lunch tray. During an observation on 9/22/25 at 1:05 p.m., in Resident 38's room, Resident 38 was provided with his lunch tray without offering hand hygiene prior. There was no hand wipes were noted on Resident 38's lunch tray. During an observation in Resident 3's room on 9/22/25 at 1:08 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2) donned (put on) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) without first…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 22) when the oxygen order did not match the amount of oxygen the resident was administered.This failure caused Resident 22 to receive the incorrect amount of oxygen.Findings:A review of an admission record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility in early 2022 with diagnosis which included chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (condition where the body fails to adequately remove carbon dioxide from the blood) and hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues).A review of Resident 22's physician order dated 7/17/25 indicated, PRN [as needed] Oxygen @2L [liters]/min Via NC [nasal cannula] .A review of Resident 22's care plan initiated 1/10/24 indicated, [Resident 22] has oxygen therapy r/t [related to] Ineffective gas exchange.OXYGEN SETTINGS: O2 [oxygen] via NC @ 1-2L PRN.During an observation on 9/22/25 at 8:23 a.m. of Resident 22's oxygen concentrator, the oxygen was set to deliver 4L/min. A picture was taken of the oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment and service to maintain or improve mobility for one resident (Resident 38) out of a census of 36 when Resident 38 did not receive Restorative Nurse Assistance (RNA-program designed to help residents maintain or regain maximum physical potential) sessions as ordered and was not evaluated for proper wheelchair height.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 38's ability to do activities of daily living (ADL, basic self-care tasks that are typically performed independently daily, i.e. dressing, bathing, toileting) did not diminish.Findings:A review of Resident 38's admission record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of infection and inflammatory (part of the body becoming red, swollen, hot and often painful) reaction due to internal right hip prosthesis (artificial body part).A review of Resident 38's Section F-Preferences for Customary Routine and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. staff were knowledgeable of the abuse reporting guidelines: whom to report abuse allegations and the time frame for reporting abuse allegations, and 2.an abuse allegation was reported within the two-hour reporting time frame. These failures could put all facility residents at risk to experience abuse without timely reporting to the designated agencies. Findings: 1. During an interview on 6/18/25 at 10:54 a.m., Unlicensed Staff A stated abuse allegations should be reported to the state (California Department of Public Health or CDPH) and the Administrator (ADM) within 24 hours. Unlicensed Staff A stated it was important for abuse allegations to be reported to the right agencies and at the appropriate time frame so the allegations could be investigated while the details were still clear for the safety and wellbeing of the residents. During an interview on 6/18/25 at 12:57 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) B stated abuse allegations were expected to be reported to the state and the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility's enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention, that involves the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities to reduce the transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms [MDROs, bacteria, that have become resistant to multiple antibiotics]) for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 2) when staff did not wear gown while changing Resident 2's incontinence brief (a type of absorbent undergarment, similar to an adult diaper). This failure could result in a higher risk of transmitting MDROs to residents and could make residents sick. Findings A review of Resident 2's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in September 2017 with diagnoses including Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder (neurogenic bladder-a problem in which a person lacks bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve condition). A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin potentially resulting from abuse to the Department within two hours. This failure delayed the Department's investigation of the injury and potential abuse. The facility further failed to ensure staff were trained on reporting abuse allegations. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse. During an interview on 5/21/24 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator in Training (AIT) stated injury of unknown origin for Resident 1 was reported on 5/17/24. During an interview on 5/21/24 at 2:35 PM, Unlicensed Staff A stated she entered Resident 1's room on 5/17/24 to assist him with getting dressed. Unlicensed Staff A helped Resident 1 remove his shirt and she observed bruising on his left upper chest and going into his left armpit. The bruising was all shades – purple, blue, yellow, and green. Unlicensed staff A asked Resident 1 what happened. Resident 1 stated it happened last night when a guy came in and roughed me up. Unlicensed Staff A immediately reported the bruising to Licensed Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy for one of two sampled residents, Resident 1, when staff did not implement Resident 1's care plan for a behavior that put him at high risk for conflict, and staff were not trained on how to respond to his aggression. This resulted in Resident 1 arguing aggressively with a staff member while no staff intervened for approximately 10 to 20 minutes. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 2/7/24 at 11:15 a.m., Resident 1 was sitting in his bed in his room directly across from the nurses' station. A transfer pole (a floor-to-ceiling grab bar used for transferring between the bed and wheelchair) was noted at his bedside. Resident 1 stated that on 1/28/24 he was in bed and needed to go bad, I needed to have a BM (bowel movement). He stated he waited an hour for his aide, and another aide finally came and got him to the bathroom. Resident 1 stated that later when he saw his aide, Unlicensed Staff A, he told her the other aides can't do all your work for you,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report potential abuse timely when a nurse witnessed a certified nursing assistant yell and cuss at a resident, Resident 1, and facility staff did not report the incident, or Resident 1's grievance about the incident, to the Department for three days. This failure resulted in a delayed suspension of a potentially abusive staff member and a delayed investigation into an allegation of abuse of a vulnerable resident. Findings: On 1/31/24, the Department received a report from the facility that indicated, During a meeting on 1/31/24 @ 3:30 pm the ombudsman had reported that they had received a report of potential abuse between this resident and a staff member. Immediately initiated an investigation and staff member suspended immediately. During an observation and concurrent interview on 2/7/24 at 11:15 a.m., Resident 1 was sitting in his bed in his room. Resident 1 stated that on 1/28/24 he waited an hour for his aide to help him with toileting, and another aide finally came and got him to the bathroom. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide behavioral management care according to the care plan of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when staff argued with Resident 1, who had a known behavior of verbal and physical aggression towards staff, and staff did not remove or redirect Resident 1 from the source of agitation. This failure resulted in Resident 1's behavior escalating and to continue his aggression for 10 to 20 minutes. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 2/7/24 at 11:15 a.m., Resident 1 was sitting in his bed in his room directly across from the nurses' station. Resident 1 stated that on 1/28/24 he was in bed and called for assistance to the bathroom. He stated he waited an hour for his aide, and another aide finally came and got him to the bathroom. Resident 1 stated that later that day he saw his aide, Unlicensed Staff A, and told her the other aides can't do all your work for you, you need to pick it up. Resident 1 stated, She (Unlicensed Staff A) got all mad. I told her to quit being so lazy, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to treat six residents (Resident 6, Confidential Resident 30, Confidential Resident 34, Confidential Resident 2, Confidential Resident 3 and Confidential Resident 202.) out to 12 sampled residents with dignity when staff would assist a resident to the bathroom and then leave for an extended period of time, answer a call light and then not return to provide care. These failures resulted in residents feeling like they were worthless or invisible. Findings: During an interview on 1/9/24 at 8:45 a.m., Resident 6 stated that when she pressed her call light for assistance, sometimes her aid would come in and tell her they had three residents they needed to help before her and she would have to wait. Resident 6 stated she thought to herself, I hope they don't forget about me. During an interview on 1/9/24 at 9:36 a.m., with Confidential Resident 202, Confidential Resident 202 indicated some of the staff were disrespectful when providing care. Confidential Resident 202 indicated an occurrence where a staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Replace the roof which had been leaking for at least three years, and 2. Had shower doors which locked and were not easily accessed by staff. These failures resulted in residents living in an environment that was visibly in need of repair and upkeep. Findings: 1. During a phone interview on 1/9/24 at 11:09 a.m., a confidential family member stated she felt the facility looked neglected and could use a good cleaning and paint job. She stated whenever she came here to visit her mom she wanted to bring her gardening gloves and pruning sheers and go to work on the grounds. During an observation on 1/10/24 at 8:25 a.m., while rain was falling on the roof of the facility, the rain gutter and eave midway toward the entrance of the facility looked broken/rotten. Rain water was pouring over the gutter like a waterfall in front of a resident's window as the rain was coming down. Note: a photo was taken of the rotten gutter and eave. During an observation on 1/10/24 at 9:54 a.m., heavy rain was falling on the roof…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or their responsible party with a summary of the resident's Baseline Plan of Care for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 21 and 102). This failure had the potential to limit communication with the resident and/or their responsible party on how the facility planned to manage the resident's needed services and treatments while at the facility, which could have led to the resident feeling stressed, uneasy and lack of trust with the staff providing care, leading to negatively affecting the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 21's admission Record, indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including CHF (Congested Heart Failure: long-term condition that happens when your heart cannot pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply), Non-Stemi Myocardial Infarction (Partial blockage of one of the coronary arteries, causing reduced flow of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to : 1. Identify failure of staff to follow hand hygiene procedure (Cross Reference F880), 2. Identify failure to provide new residents and families with baseline care plans (Cross Reference F655), 3. Identify the failure of staff to respond to residents' requests for help (Cross Reference F550). These failures prevented the QAPI committee from developing, implementing, and evaluating action plans to correct systematic deficient practices. Finding: During an interview on 1/12/24 at 11:30 a.m. with Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON), Administrator stated the QAPI committee found projects through surveys, complaint investigations, things come up at the meetings, inspections rounds, and floor staff could bring projects. Administrator stated once the committee identified it (a project) we work to fix it. DON stated hand hygiene and baseline care plans were not projects they were currently working on. Administrator stated the committee was not tracking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer COVID-19 ( an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and those infection could experience mild to moderate or severe respiratory illness) immunizations (a process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination.) as appropriate to four (Confidential Resident 30, Confidential Resident 34, Confidential Resident 2 and Confidential Resident 3) out of 12 sampled residents. This failure had the potential for residents to acquire COVID-19 and suffer a more serious illness without the added benefit of having the vaccine in their system. Findings: During a concurrent interview on 1/10/24 at 2:26 p.m. with Confidential Resident 30, Confidential Resident 34, Confidential Resident 2 and Confidential Resident 3 all indicated they had wanted to COVID-19 vaccine but were denied by the facility. Resident 30 indicated the facility had indicated the resident would be vaccinated after training for the nurses had taken place but that was back in October of 2023. Confidential Resident 30 indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents' (Resident 18) Responsible Party (RP) Family Member X was able to participate in care conferences. This failure resulted in Resident 18's RP Family Member X not being involved in the overall plan of care with regard to Resident 18's decline in health. Findings: Review of Resident 18's, admission Record, dated 5/3/19, indicated Resident 18 has been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of unspecified dementia, chronic kidney disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing related problems). The admission Record document indicated Resident 18's RP was listed as Family Member X. During an interview on 1/9/24 at 5:26 p.m., with Resident 18's Responsible Person (RP) Family Member X, RP Family Member X, indicated he had wondered when the next care conference was scheduled since he wanted to discuss some issues regarding Resident 18's decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to safeguard one of one sample residents when Resident 18 had lost his glasses and the facility did not know nor replace his glasses. This failure resulted in Resident 18 wearing non- prescription glasses until his eyes were re-examined and potentially injuring himself by running into obstacles not in focus. Findings: During an observation an interview and observation on 1/8/24 at 1:19 p.m., with Resident 18, he indicated he was not aware how long he had resided at the facility. Resident 18 indicated during the interview that his memory was not so good anymore. Resident 18 was observed wearing glasses with a clear lens so as not to be confused with sunglasses on his face. During a telephone interview on 1/9/24 at 5:26 p.m., Resident 18's Responsible Party (RP) indicated Resident 18 had an eye appointment and received new prescription glasses, but the glasses were lost approximately a year and half ago. Resident 18's Responsible Party indicated he had contacted the facility and had been waiting for the facility to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review the facility failed to keep one of one sampled resident (Resident 38), safe from verbal abuse. This failure resulted in Resident 38 suffering verbal abuse from a staff member. Findings: During a review of a facility-reported event to the Department, dated 12/26/23 , between Resident 38 and Unlicensed Staff E, it indicated Unlicensed Staff E was speaking disrespectfully to Resident 38 as described, stop and eat your lunch, you are a grown ass man. Unlicensed Staff E was indicated to then slam the desert on Resident 38's lunch tray causing it to fall on the ground. Unlicensed Staff E was indicated to state, now I have to go an get you another one. During a review of Resident 38's, admission Record, dated 9/26/23, indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a history of end stage liver disease , hepatic encephalopathy, chronic diastolic heart failure and chronic hepatic failure for which he was place on end of life care. Multiple attempts were made to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed for have an individualized care plan for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 21 and 23) when: 1. Resident 21 was not care planned for being on Eliquis (Apixaban: blood thinner medicine that reduces blood clotting). 2. Resident 23 was not care planned for Hospice [A type of care and philosophy of care that focuses on the palliation (easing the severity of a pain or a disease without removing the cause) of a chronically ill, terminally ill, or seriously ill patient's pain and symptoms, and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs]. The lack of care plans had the potential for direct care staff not to monitor, treat, and reassess and/or prevent: 1. Resident 21 for blood thinner side effects, which include higher risk of bleeding, bruise more easily, may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop, and may have a higher risk of bleeding if resident takes blood thinners in combination with other medicines that increase ones risk of bleeding,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Verify the identity of a resident prior to medication administration; and 2. Carry out a physician order for a referral to an out-of-town physical therapy clinic (Resident 19). These failures had the potential to result in a medication error or delay treatment for Resident 19's back pain. Findings: 1. During an medication pass observation and concurrent interview on 1/10/24 at 5p.m., Licensed Staff D entered a resident's room with a cup of medications. Licensed Staff D greeted the resident and the resident took her medications with water. Licensed Staff D returned to the medication cart to document the medications. When queried, Licensed Staff D stated she identified the resident by greeting her with her name and the resident answered. Licensed Staff D stated the facility did not have arm bands for the residents, so she did not have any other way to verify their identity. During an interview on 1/11/24 at 3:22 p.m., Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide an annual review for one (Unlicensed Staff F) out of one sampled unlicensed staff. This failure had the potential for unlicensed staff working in the facility to be either incompetent or inappropriately working with residents. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/12/24 at 10:22 a.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD indicated that Unlicensed Staff F was initially hired at the facility on 3/16/16. DSD was unable to locate the annual review document for 2022 or 2023. DSD indicated Unlicensed Staff F had been terminated as of 10/24/23 but could not locate the paperwork to indicate cause for termination. DSD was reviewing piles and piles of loose papers in folders and unable to locate the annual review documents or cause for termination. DSD was able to locate in-service training through labeled binders but nothing further. Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Staff Competency Assessment, dated 3/17/22, indicated, Competency assessments will be performed upon hired during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 21) was being monitored closely while on Eliquis (Apixaban: blood thinner (anticoagulant) medicine that reduces blood clotting). Not monitoring for the risks for blood thinner side effects, which include higher risk of bleeding, bruise more easily, may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop, and may have a higher risk of bleeding if resident takes blood thinners in combination with other medicines that increase ones risk of bleeding, unexpected pain, swelling or joint pain, headaches or weak or dizzy, serious fall or hit on the head could impact one's physical wellbeing, lead to harm and even death. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission Record, indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including CHF (Congested Heart Failure: long-term condition that happens when your heart cannot pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply), Non-Stemi…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff performed hand hygiene when entering and exiting residents' bedrooms and between doffing and donning of gloves when providing resident care as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure on hand hygiene. This failure had the potential to lead to the spread on infection among other residents. During an observation on 01/09/24 at 08:35 a.m., Unlicensed Staff (Staff B) entered a resident's shared room without performing hand hygiene. Staff B picked up a meal tray and brought it to the cart in the hallway. No hand hygiene was observed being performed by Staff B. During an observation on 01/09/24 at 08:38 a.m. Staff B returned to pick up another meal tray and did not perform hand hygiene prior to entering the resident's room. Staff B proceeded to bring to the meal tray to the cart in the hallway at the nurse's station. Staff B did not perform hand hygiene and went on to perform another task. During an observation on 01/09/24 at 10:06 a.m. in the [NAME] Hallway, Licensed Staff A (Staff A)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to deliver nursing care to residents when 11 of 31 days in the month of July 2023 only one licensed nurse worked the evening shift. This failure had the potential to cause delayed response to call for assistance making residents feel unattended and irritated, or cause falls and other accidents. Findings: During an interview on 8/16/23, at 2:47 p.m., Resident 1 stated it had irritated him to wait for assistance while sitting/lying in soiled underpants/linen. Once at 2 to 3 in the morning he soiled his underpants/sheets and had to wait for 7 a.m. to be cleaned by the morning shift Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). He had told the Administrator about the long waiting time, but things are still the same. During an interview on 9/25/23, at 1:57 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant A (CNA-A) stated they were given more patient assignment and it is possible to have residents wait long if they are short staff because they have more things to do - take care of more residents, leave one resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of five sampled residents (Resident 36, Resident 28, Resident 35, Resident 10, and Resident 17) were informed, and had access to the binder containing survey findings from the last State survey. This failure had the potential to result in lack of information regarding facility deficiencies and inability to receive information from agencies acting as client advocates, which could have resulted in residents not having the opportunity to contact these agencies. Findings: During a resident council meeting on 5/03/22, Resident 36, Resident 28, Resident 35, Resident 10, and Resident 17 were asked if the results of the most recent survey were available to read. All five residents stated they did not know where to find them, including Resident 36, the Resident Council President. During an interview on 5/03/22 at 4:14 p.m., the Activities Director confirmed he had not discussed with the residents where to find the results of the most recent survey. The Activities Director was asked to show the Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan consistent with residents' rights, when: 1. Two (2) of thirteen (13) sampled residents (Resident 146 and Resident 24) with high pain levels, did not have comprehensive person-centered care plans for pain management, and the ones they had did not mention non-pharmacological (Interventions not consisting of medications) interventions in helping the residents with pain control. This had the potential to result in lack of information to facility staff on techniques and interventions to control the residents' pain to tolerable levels, which could have caused harm and suffering to the residents. 2. One (1) of thirteen (13) sampled residents (Resident 35), who spent most of the time in his room, did not have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for activities. This had the potential to result in lack of information to facility staff on the residents' activities of choice, which could have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure nursing staff utilized professional standards when providing resident care when: 1) Licensed Staff did not place a pressure-relieving mattress on the bed of one resident (Resident 94) when she had restricted mobility due to pain. This failure caused potential for Resident 94 to experience skin breakdown and potentially develop pressure ulcers (bed sores), that could lead to increased pain and poor quality of life (Pressure Ulcers are areas of localized damage to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin); 2) One Licensed nurse (Licensed Nurse D ) crushed an Enteric-coated tablet (designed to resist dissolving and being absorbed in the stomach. Reduce gastric irritation associated with uncoated tablets) for Resident 26 without a physician's order. This failure could potentially alter the absorption or stability of the medication compromising Resident 26's health and well-being; and 3) One Licensed nurse (Licensed Nurse D) did not ensure a large chewable tablet was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs-A term used in healthcare to refer to people's daily self-care activities) to dependent (Residents that depended on staff for ADLs) residents when: 1. Eight (8) of thirteen (13) sampled residents (Resident 35, Resident 39, Resident 36, Resident 24, Resident 6, Resident 26, Resident 17 & Resident 10), and nine (9) of thirty-five (35) unsampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 30, Resident 37, Resident 25, Resident 20, Resident 21, Resident 16, Resident 19 & Resident 28), did not receive their scheduled showers or baths for weeks, with some not having received any baths or showers in over one month, and; 2. Two (2) of (13) sampled residents (Resident 17 & Resident 36), did not receive incontinence care (Cleaning of the skin and changing soiled disposable briefs on a resident with an incontinent episode) promptly, causing them to remain in soiled briefs for hours. These failures had the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the Activities Program met the needs of all the residents in the facility when no residents were observed, or confirmed participating in activities throughout the Recertification Survey from 5/02/22 through 5/09/22. This failure had the potential to result in boredom, depression, and anxiety for the residents of the facility. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure (A chronic progressive condition that affects the pumping power of the heart muscle), and Respiratory Failure (A condition in which the lungs have a hard time loading the blood with oxygen or removing carbon dioxide), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Resident 35's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 3/24/22 indicated his BIMS (Brief interview of mental status-a cognition assessment) score was 13, which indicated his cognition was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 23 residents, out of a census of 48, (Resident 36, Unsampled Resident 25, Resident 29, Resident 7, Resident 194, Resident 4, Resident 10, Resident 15, Resident 9, Resident 26, Resident 20, Resident 19, Resident 4, Resident 3, Resident 33, Resident 196, Resident 201, Resident 40, Resident 2, Resident 147, and Resident 28) had in-person, onsite physician visits when Physician P only provided telemedicine consults/visits. (Telemedicine allows health care professionals to evaluate, diagnose and treat patients at a distance using telecommunications technology - computers, video, phone, messaging). This failure prevented Physician P from physically assessing 23 residents and potentially prevented him from providing an in-depth evaluation of the each resident's condition and total program of care. Findings: During a telephone interview on 05/06/22 at 9 a.m., Physician P was asked about Resident 94's admission and pain control while at the facility. Physician P stated he provided telemedicine services and Resident 94 had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not have sufficient staff to meet the residents' needs when: 1. Call lights were not answered promptly, and; 2. There were insufficient staff to provide residents with their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs-A term used in healthcare to refer to people's daily self-care activities) when sixteen (16) of forty-eight (48) residents were found to not be receiving their scheduled showers/baths. These findings had the potential to result in inability for the residents to obtain assistance when they needed it, inability for staff to respond to medical emergencies, and lack of health services provided to the facility residents. Findings: 1. During Resident Council Meeting on 5/03/22 at 11:04 a.m., Resident 14 stated it took at least half an hour for staff to respond to call lights. Record review of Resident 14 MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 2/12/22, indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) score was 14, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was below 5% when one (1) of three (3) Licensed Nurses (Licensed Nurse D) did not follow the manufacturer's recommendations and doctor's order regarding administration of medication for five residents (Residents 6, 9, 15, 26 and 31) which resulted in seven (7) medication administration errors out of 33 administration opportunities (21% error rate). This failure had the potential to compromise the absorption of the medication and the risk of compromising the resident's health and well-being for not getting the required dose of medication according to the doctor's order and according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Findings: #1 During a medication pass observation with Licensed Nurse D on 5/04/22 at 8:21 a.m. Licensed Nurse D administered medications to Resident 31 that included one chewable tablet of Calcium Carbonate (TUMS - treat symptoms caused by too much stomach acid) 500 mg (milligram - weight equal to one thousandth of a gram). Resident 31 was not instructed to chew…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure sanitary conditions in the kitchen when: 1) One dietary staff member (Staff L) did not wear an N95 respirator (face mask designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) per policy; dietary staff did not wear face coverings (masks) per policy; and dietary staff did not wash their hands after touching and repositioning their face masks/respirators, and 2) The facility did not monitor documented mold inside the ice machine and on fans utilized within the kitchen. These failures caused potential for transmission of disease-causing microorganisms, including Covid-19 and mold, to vulnerable residents with multiple health issues, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1) During an observation and concurrent interview on 5/02/22 at 2:50 p.m., Dietary Staff L (who was not vaccinated against Covid-19) was washing dishes; he was not wearing a face covering (mask or N95) while washing the dishes. When asked about his lack of face covering, Staff L stated he had a mask and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify quality deficiencies, and develop and implement plans to resolve them in their QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement-a data driven and proactive approach to quality improvement to ensure services are meeting quality standards and assuring care reaches a certain level) program, when: 1. The facility did not have a QAPI project focused on sixteen (16) of forty-eight (48) residents not getting their regular showers and baths for weeks. This had the potential to result in continuous lack of ADL (Activities of daily living-a term use to describe self-help skills) services, which could have caused skin breakdown and infections, discomfort and loss of dignity to the residents involved. 2. The facility did not have a QAPI project focused on infection control, and the lack of an antibiotic steward program that identified, tracked, and ensured antibiotics were used properly, and only when needed. This had the potential to result in inappropriate use of antibiotics, increased microbial resistance and poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement measures to reduce the risk of disease and infection transmission when: 1. Two of three Licensed Nurses (Licensed Nurse D and Licensed F) did not perform proper hand hygiene before and after medication administration to residents. This failure had the potential to result in a spread of infections and/or transmission of diseases to the residents. 2. Two of 11 sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 194) received oxygen therapy via nasal cannula and the cannula tubing was not changed and dated per facility policy. This failure could result in bacteria build up which could potentially lead to respiratory infections. 3. One dietary staff member (Staff L) did not wear an N95 respirator (face mask designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) per policy; dietary staff did not wear face coverings (masks) per policy; and dietary staff did not wash their hands after touching and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an antibiotic stewardship program (A coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics) that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary and inappropriate use of antibiotics, and the development of antibiotic resistant organisms, which could have caused superinfections (Infection occurring after or on top of an earlier infection, especially following treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics) and poor clinical outcomes to the residents of the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/04/22 at 9:41 a.m., the Infection Preventionist was asked to provide evidence of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. The Infection Preventionist provided four handouts. The handouts provided indicated two residents (Resident 28 and Resident 36) had been on antibiotics in 2022, but the information was limited. The first handout was about Resident 28. This document titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-05-09 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appoint a qualified individual for the Infection Preventionist role, when: 1. The Infection Preventionist did not have the qualifications and training to implement an antibiotic stewardship program to promote and monitor appropriate antibiotic use. This failure had the potential to result in the development of antibiotic resistant organisms, which could have caused superinfections (Infection occurring after or on top of an earlier infection, especially following treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics) and poor clinical outcomes to the residents of the facility. 2. The Infection Preventionist was not educated on the state requirements for checking visitors' vaccination status. This failure had the potential to result in spread of COVID-19, a potentially deadly virus, to the residents and staff at the facility. 3. The Infection Preventionist was unaware of simple infection control tasks such as how often tubing changes needed to be performed on residents using supplemental oxygen. This had the potential to result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 35) and his family, the opportunity to participate in care planning when no care conference meetings (A meeting between healthcare professionals, the resident, and family members to decide the resident's needs, discuss the medical team's goals, and discuss the family's ideas for meeting those needs) were held inviting him and his family to help develop his plan of care. This failure had the potential to result in inability for the Resident 35 and his family to advocate for his needs and receive information regarding his care. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure (A chronic progressive condition that affects the pumping power of the heart muscle), and Respiratory Failure (A condition in which the lungs have a hard time loading the blood with oxygen or removing carbon dioxide), according to the facility Face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC - Completed by the facility to notify the resident of his or her right to an expedited review of skilled services provided (Nursing and Rehab services (Physical Therapy, Occupational and Speech therapy)) to one (1 ) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 34) who received Medicare Part A (Federal Health Insurance) benefits. This failure resulted in Resident 34 not given the choice to appeal the facility's decision to discontinue her treatment. During a clinical record review for Resident 34, the Face Sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under Medicare Part A Skilled Services with diagnosis including Fractures and other multiple traumas. During a clinical record review for Resident 34, the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool completed by clinical staff to identify potential resident problems, strengths,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the room of 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 17), was kept safe, and in good repair, when a hole, the size of a US (United States) quarter, was observed in the bathroom door facing the room, containing wooden splinters with sharp edges. This room and bathroom were shared with Resident 33, who had vision impairments. This failure had the potential to result in residents accidentally placing a finger inside the hole, causing serious cuts and scrapes. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (A condition in which blood sugars are abnormally high) with Circulatory Complications (A condition that affects how the heart or blood vessels pump blood), and Memory Deficit (Unusual forgetfulness), according to the Facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). During a concurrent observation and interview on 05/02/22 at 3:43 p.m., a hole about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for one (1) of thirteen (13) sampled residents (Resident 39) when a Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool completed by clinical staff to identify potential resident problems, strengths, and preferences) was not completed within 14 days of Resident 39's admission to hospice care. This failure resulted to an inaccurate representation of Resident 39's current clinical status and had the potential to cause inadequate care based on a delinquent comprehensive assessment and care planning. (Reference F686) Findings: During a clinical record review for Resident 39, the Physician's Order dated 4/6/22 indicated Resident 39 was admitted to hospice services for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (type of dementia that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior). During a clinical record review for Resident 39 and concurrent interview on 5/05/22 at 10:15 a.m. with Licensed Nurse G regarding Resident 39's assessments, Licensed Nurse G stated she was responsible in making sure MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide services to prevent the worsening of a pressure ulcer for one (1) of thirteen (13) sampled residents (Resident 39) when the facility did not provide low air loss mattress and followed their policy and procedure. This failure contributed to the increased size of the wound since admission. Findings: During a clinical record review for Resident 39, the Face Sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Alzheimer's Disease (type of dementia that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior), Diabetes Mellitus (a condition that occurs when the body can't use glucose (a type of sugar) normally), Adult Failure to Thrive (a decline seen in older adults), Protein Calorie Malnutrition (inadequate intake of food )as a source of protein, calories, and other essential nutrients)) and a Stage Three Pressure Ulcer of sacral region…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one(1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 29) , when he attempted to light a cigarette while wearing a nasal cannula (A small, flexible plastic tube worn around the head that directs oxygen from a source to a person's nostrils), that administered oxygen. This resulted in burns to Resident 29's face, lip, cheek and nose, melted the nasal cannula and had the potential for substantial harm and possibly death. Findings: During an interview on 1/13/12 at 9:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she interviewed Licensed Nurse V after the incident, and she stated on 1/09/21 at around 7:00 a.m., Licensed Nurse V stated she was in Resident 29's room and smelled cigarette smoke. The DON stated Licensed Nurse V stated she asked Resident 29 about the smell and he stated he just wanted to smoke a cigarette. The DON stated Licensed Nurse V stated she observed discoloration on Resident 29's face and his facial hair looked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its own Policy and Procedure when one of two sampled residents (Resident 146) with a indwelling suprapubic catheter (Hollow, flexible tubes inserted into the bladder through a small cut in the abdomen to drain urine into a bag) draining dark red urine, did not have his urine output monitored. This failure had the potential to result inability to identify blockage of the urinary catheter, which could have caused serious bladder conditions, and urinary tract infections. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Fracture of Head and Neck of Left Femur (Thigh bone) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (Prostate gland enlargement), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). During an observation on 5/03/22 at 10:48 a.m., Resident 146 was observed in bed, in a hospital gown. A urinary catheter was observed hanging from the left side of the bed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consulting Pharmacist's (Consultant CC) review of Resident 7's medications identified and addressed irregularities with her physician's order for Insulin Lispro (rapid-acting insulin; medication to treat high blood sugar in diabetics; onset of action is within 15 minutes). This failure resulted in nursing staff administering Insulin Lispro at 9 p.m. and 3 a.m., which potentially contributed to Resident 7 experiencing hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). Findings: During an observation and interview on 5/05/22 at 10:41 a.m., Resident 7 was in her room and stated she took Insulin and her blood sugars had improved. Review of Resident 7's MAR (medication administration report; nurses document medication administration here) indicated her physician ordered her to receive, Insulin Lispro . subcutaneously (injection under the skin into the soft tissue) five times a day related to Type 2 diabetes . The MAR indicated the Insulin Lispro was timed to be given at 3 a.m., 7:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., 4:30 p.m. and 9 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure a large chewable tablet was administered safely to one (1) of eight (8) sampled residents (Resident 31) when Licensed Nurse D did not instruct Resident 31 to chew a chewable tablet before medication administration. This failure resulted to a choking experience for Resident 31 that caused him to feel distressed. (Reference F759) Findings: During a medication pass observation with Licensed Nurse D on 5/04/22 at 8:21 a.m. Licensed Nurse D administered medications to Resident 31 that included one chewable tablet of Calcium Carbonate (TUMS - treat symptoms caused by too much stomach acid) 500 mg (milligram - weight equal to one thousandth of a gram). Licensed Nurse D did not instruct Resident 31 to chew the medication before handing the medication cup. Resident 31 took all his medications all at once and started gasping for air, tried to clear his throat by coughing, and tapping his chest. Licensed Nurse D watched Resident 31 and kept asking if he was okay. Resident 31 had difficulty talking at that time while he took several sips of water. After clearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2024 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2011 |
| COLLIER, BRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| WINGET, LEI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/15/2025 |
| SEAVIEW WELLNESS GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2011 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2011 |
| EUREKA-LET LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/17/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055208. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.