No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Chico Terrace Care Center

188 Cohasset Lane, Chico, CA 95926 · For profit - Partnership · 76 certified beds · (530) 343-6084 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (530) 343-6084 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)$34,573 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $34,573 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
500 Cohasset Rd · (530) 879-7438 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
251 Cohasset Rd · (530) 343-4440 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
801 East Ave · (530) 343-9920 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1749 Spruce Ave · (530) 332-8180

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%1.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.9%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.5%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.062.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.991.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 316 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.51U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.6%CMS range 47.7–57.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 9.3–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge72.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 5.6–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 69.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.97 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-06)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three (Resident 1), who spoke Spanish was explained what medications were being administered to them in a language they understood. This failure had the potential to result in violating the resident's right to be informed of their treatment. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's medical record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), pneumonia (lung inflammation caused by an infection), and end stage renal disease (the kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the needs of one's body). Resident 1's primary language is Spanish. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan Report located in Resident 1's electronic health record, indicated that on 11/26/25 Resident 1 was identified as having potential communication problem related to language barrier of primary language Spanish. , and the plan was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change of condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was having loose stools for eight days before the physician was notified. This failure resulted in the physician being unaware of Resident 1's condition and unable to evaluate the resident for needed changes in the treatment plan. Findings: During a review of the facility policy titled Change of Condition Notification, dated 4/1/15 indicated that the facility will promptly inform the resident, consult with the residents Attending Physician, and notify the resident's legal representative or an interested family member, if known, when the resident endures a significant change in their condition caused by, but not limited to: an accident, a significant change in the residents physical, mental, or psychosocial status; and or a significant change in treatment. A change of condition related to attending physician notification is defined as when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to withhold (not give) a stool softener medication as directed by the physicians' orders for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 continuing to receive the medication despite experiencing diarrhea. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's medical record, indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), pneumonia (lung inflammation caused by an infection), and end stage renal disease (the kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the needs of one's body).During a review of Resident 1's physician order, dated 11/17/25, indicated a new order for Bisacodyl (a laxative) oral tablet to be given once every day. Additional directions indicated hold for loose stools. During a review of Resident 1's electronic medication administration record (MAR) for 12/2025, indicated that from 12/1/25 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-06 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to:Ensure uncertified Nurse's Aides (NA, in training not certified) did not provide direct resident care (hands on care) while unsupervised by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA, certified by state) or Licensed Nurse (LN).Ensure uncertified Nurse's Aide did not go beyond the time frame of four months between hiring, graduation, and certification. This had the potential to put all residents at risk of injury and not to meet their care needs. Refer to F839.Findings:A review of Facility 2's document titled FACILITY: NURSE ASSISTANT TRAINING PROGRAM NOTICE dated 5/8/25, indicated they had an approved Nurse's Aide Training Program Nurse's Aide Training Program (NATP, a state approved program designed to teach nurse's aides theory and clinical skills to enable eligibility to test for certification) from California Department of Public Health (CDPH).A record review of Facility 2's policy titled, Hiring and Employment Verification revised 12/26/202,) indicated The facility is committed to hiring qualified, ethical, and legally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-06 · tag F0837 — pattern
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the Governing Body failed to provide oversight for the Administrator to ensure nurse's aides were state certified and had the competencies required prior to providing care to residents independently and were certified within four months of graduating from a Nurse's Aide Training Program Nurse's Aide Training Program (NATP, a state approved program designed to teach nurse's aides theory and clinical skills to enable eligibility to test for certification). This had the potential to put all residents at risk of injury and harm and to not receive quality of care when nine Nurse's Assistants (NA, in training not certified by state) were hired prior to becoming state certified to practice as Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA, certified by state). Refer to F728.Findings:A review of the Governing Body Agenda and Minutes dated 10/24/2025 indicated that policy development, establishment, and implementation were handled by Administrative Services. A record review of Facility 1's Operational Manual Administrative Policies (undated) indicated the Governing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medical records for one out of four Residents (Resident 1) in a timely manner.This had the potential to interfere with Resident 1's care decision making and cause distress to his well-being.During a review of the facility's policy titled Resident Access to Protected Health Information (PHI), revised November 1, 2015, indicated If the resident and/or their personal representative requests a copy of the resident's medical record.[the facility] will provide the resident and/or their personal representative with a copy of the medical record within two (2) working days after receiving the written request.During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Essential Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Mild Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 8/11/25, documented a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse to one resident (RES1), when a Licensed Nurse at the facility (LVN1) was verbally abusive while providing care to RES1. This failure had the potential to cause harm to all residents residing in the facility that had contact with LVN1. Findings: During a review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention, Screening and Training Program, last revised 7/1/18, and in effect, indicated that the facility did not condone any form of abuse and would provide an environment free of abuse to all residents. Verbal abuse was defined as any oral, written, or gestured communication that is belittling or derogatory and directed at any resident regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability. During a review of a nursing progress note by LVN1 on 5/16/25, at 10:57 PM, it was indicated that education about the importance of nutrition for health and to rebuild strength was provided to RES1. During an interview on 5/29/25, at 11:17 AM, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) indicated that RES1's family brought in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-06 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained, competent and following their training when: *1. Staff did not clean fixed equipment (equipment that cannot be put thought a dish washer or washed in a sink, such as refrigerators, steamers, stoves, carts, counters, shelving, and small appliances) according to policy or standards of practice. *2. Staff did not consistently follow professional standards of practice to avoid cross contamination during food production processes. (Cross Reference F812). *3. Staff did not follow standardized recipes. Findings: During a record review of facility onboarding checklist for dietary staff titled Food and Nutrition Services: New Employee Onboarding Checklist (undated), indicated dietary staff were trained on twenty-two topics. The document further indicated seven of the twenty-two topics pertained specifically to the kitchen and included: location of work order maintenance and how to complete forms; dress code; job description; location and use of dietary manual, therapeutic diets, menus,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that recipes were standardized to provide a repeatable desirable product, yield and texture; that appropriate ingredients were available on the order guide to prepare recipes successfully and in compliance with their nutrient analysis; and to provide seasoning acceptable to the diet order and resident satisfaction. These failures had the potential to result in staff not following recipes because they didn't work or didn't produce the correct yield or consistency, and the potential to decrease resident satisfaction, meal intakes, and overall health status. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Menus, revised 4/1/14 showed the facility provided meals that met the nutritional requirements defined by the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. The Dietary Manager will develop menus in collaboration with the Dietitian. Menus are to be designed in consideration of resident preferences, Dietary Department resources, and seasonal availability of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-06 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were consistently offered evening bedtime snacks per facility policy for four out of four sampled residents (Resident 372, 15, 59, 34). Facility also failed to ensure snacks were stocked at two out of two nursing stations per facility policy. This failure had the potential to negatively affect nutrition status and wellbeing of all residents. The facility census was 72. Findings: During a record review of facility policy titled Nourishment and Snacks 4/1/14, indicated Individual and/or bulk snacks are available at the nurse's station for consumption by residents. Additional snacks may be made available upon resident request. Facility policy further indicated rotation of snacks is indicated on the menu spreadsheet for hour of sleep (HS - nighttime) snacks .bulk HS snacks are provided to each nursing station daily. During an interview on 3/5/25 at 10:55 AM, Resident 372 stated he was not offered snacks by staff, but would like to be offered snacks and would take them if offered. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and distributed in accordance with professional food safety standards when: 1) Fixed equipment (Fixed equipment is equipment that cannot be put thought a dish washer or washed in a sink, such as refrigerators, steamers, stoves, carts, counters, shelving, and small appliances) was not clean. 2) Apron was not changed between cleaning dishes and preparing food. Apron was not worn when soiled counter was cleaned. 3) Dietary staff touched face with gloved hands when trays were loaded onto cart and did not change gloves or wash hands. Dietary staff touched tops and bottoms of dessert bowls and scooped Jell-O into them without gloves. 4) Cabinets, floors and walls were uncleanable. 5) Evidence of roaches under one sink. 6) Chlorine concentration was outside of acceptable parameters. 7) Ice machine was not cleaned according to manufacturer recommendations. These practices had the potential to result in foodborne illness for residents from food prepared by the facility food services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure conditions essential to the sanitation of the kitchen were maintained when uncleanable surfaces were not repaired or replaced. This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination, the attraction of pests, and foodborne illness for all residents consuming food from the facility. Findings: A review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2022 Food Code, Section 4-202.16, Nonfood-contact surfaces shall be free of unnecessary ledges, projections, and crevices, and designed and constructed to allow easy cleaning and to facilitate maintenance. A review of facility policy titled Maintenance Service, dated 1/1/12, showed The Maintenance Department maintains all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment .in compliance with current federal, state and local laws, regulations, and guidelines. During an observation in the kitchen on 3/03/25 at 8:04 AM, the floor in the refrigerator/freezer room was damaged and uncleanable in three locations. In addition, the walls, doorways, and doors in multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when: *1. The facility did not have an effective system in place to track and monitor pest control issues in the facility. *2. Cockroach traps, and evidence of cockroach presence were found in a cabinet under a food preparation sink in the facility kitchen. These failures had the potential to result in transmission of disease, or to trigger allergies or asthma for 72 residents living at the facility. Findings: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2022, 6-501.111 showed: The premises shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the premises by: (A) Routinely inspecting incoming shipments of food and supplies; (B) Routinely inspecting the premises for evidence of pests; (C) Using methods, if pests are found, such as trapping devices or, other means of pest control (D) Eliminating harborage conditions (conditions that encourage pests to live…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of eight sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 370) received their showers as scheduled, and as needed. This failure had the potential to result in emotional stress, anger, depression, feelings of neglect, denial of resident rights, and not identifying altered skin integrity. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy revised 1/1/2012, titled, Showering and Bathing, indicated a tub or shower is given to the residents to provide cleanliness, comfort, and to prevent body odor. Observe the skin is performed during the bath. The facility's policy revised 3/2017, titled, Quality of Life-Dignity, indicated that each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. All residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. The staff shall promote dignity and assist the residents as needed by promptly responding to the residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and meat easy to cut with a knife when four out of four residents interviewed (Resident 15, 18, 59, 372) stated the food needed more seasoning or salt and/or the meat was difficult to cut with the provided knife. This failure had the potential to result in decreased resident meal intakes, weight loss, and decline in health status. Findings: During an observation on 3/4/25 at 9:26 AM, [NAME] B prepared a baking sheet of Ranch-style chicken for lunch. A concurrent review of the recipe titled Ranch Style Chicken Breast, dated 2025, called for baking sheet to be greased, chicken breasts to be baked for 15 minutes, removed from oven, covered in ranch dressing, and put back in oven. Observed [NAME] B pour cooking oil into baking sheet, placed chicken breasts on baking sheet, removed from oven after 15 minutes, temperature checked with thermometer, and placed back into oven. [NAME] B was not observed putting ranch dressing onto the chicken breasts. During an observation and concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for a suprapubic (S/P, a thin tube inserted directed into the bladder at the abdomen to drain urine) catheter changes and site care were obtained upon admission to the facility for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 18) for a new admission. This failure had the potential for a negative clinical outcome, re-hospitalization, and Resident 18 had specific skin treatment needs that were not identified in a timely manner. Findings: The facility's policy revised 8/22/2019, titled, admission Criteria, indicated the facility admits residents upon the order of a physician who have medical needs that require skilled nursing care. The administrator or his or her designee responsible for screening resident for admission to the facility will ensure that the facility only admits residents whom it can provide adequate care. The facility's policy revised 1/25/2024, titled, Dialysis Management, indicated the facility should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 43) received coordination of care to get out of bed daily, and at meals to improve quality of life, and to meet goals towards independence to discharge home. These failures had the potential to result in emotional stress, anger, depression, feelings of neglect, denial of resident rights, and prevent the resident from achieving their highest practicable level of physical and emotional well-being. Findings: During a review of a policy revised 8/21/2020, titled, Bowel and Bladder Training/Toileting Program, indicated the purpose for residents who are incontinent of bowel and/or bladder appropriate treatment and services to minimize urinary tract infections and to restore as much bowel and/or bladder function as possible to prevent skin breakdown and irritation, improve resident morale, and restore resident dignity and self-respect. The facility's policy revised 3/2017, titled, Quality of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)s, and the Licensed Nurses (LN)s had competent skills when: 1. CNAs and LNs did not provide Dementia care for Resident 35 when resident was left in the Dining room alone and fell. 2. LNs did not verbalize understanding of phosphorus binder medication administration for Resident 18 and Resident 373. 3. LN A was not able to verbalize instructions for use for an inhaler ordered for Resident 373. These failures had the potential to result in emotional stress, anger, depression, feelings of neglect, denial of resident rights, and prevent the resident from achieving their highest practicable level of physical and emotional well-being. These failures did result in a fall for Resident 35. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy revised 10/2017, titled, Dementia Care, indicated the purpose is to optimize the quality of life for individuals living with a diagnosis of dementia at the facility. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Care Conference meeting, to determine that a resident may be appropriate for a facility initiated discharge, occurred with the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of healthcare professionals nurses, therapists, social workers, dietitians and activities staff who work together to plan the residents care), Physician, the resident and resident ' s responsible party (RP, an individual who assumes varying degrees of responsibility for the well-being of the resident) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ' s RP indicated she never had a meeting with the facility about Resident 1 ' s discharge therapy levels or training on how to assist Resident 1 with his mobility at home and Resident 1 was unable to make it into the house and could not stand or transfer. This failure had the potential for a decline in Resident 1 ' s physical, psychosocial, and mental well-being after discharge from the facility. Findings: A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they provided care and services for one of two residents (Resident 1) sampled for unplanned weight loss when: 1. Resident 1 was not weighed as per facility policy. 2. There was no weekly monitoring of Resident 1 ' s weight by an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of healthcare professionals nurses, therapists, social workers, dietitians and activities staff who work together to plan the residents care) the first 10 weeks after admission. 3. Care plan titled Nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem was not reviewed or revised to reflect an actual weight loss and no interventions were added to his care plan. These failures delayed care and services needed for Resident 1 to prevent weight loss and had the potential to add to the cause of Resident 1 ' s 18.8-pound weight loss in two months. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that is palatable (refers to the taste and/or flavor of the food), attractive, and nutritious. Complaints of food that is not appetizing or palatable for three of five (Residents 3, 5 and 6). This had the potential for all residents to receive an inadequate amount of nutrition required to aid in the recovery from illness or injury or maintain a healthy body weight. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Menu Operational Manual Policy, revised 04/01/2014, The Dietary Manager will develop menus in collaboration with the Dietitian. Menus are to be designed in consideration of resident preferences, Dietary Department resources, and seasonal availability of food. A record review of monthly Resident Council Meeting minutes from 6/26/24 to 10/24/24, included complaint/concerns regarding food including not liking the new food, wishing they had a different menu, and the food being too cold to consume. A record review of a Food & Nutrition: Resident Satisfaction Survey completed on 9/3/24, had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a food was prepared in a safe and sanitary kitchen in accordance with professional food standards when: 1. Food was stored in a refrigerator that was not maintained at the required temperatures for storage. 2. Food storage containers were stacked wet and available for use. 3. A soiled towel was used around a floor drain to prevent splashing. This had the potential to put all residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings: 1. A record review of Facility Visit Report - Nutritional Services dated 09/26/24, the Registered Dietician (RD) kitchen audit identified an issue of concern that the [NAME] refrigerator inside temperature was 45 degrees F. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/08/24 at 12:30 pm, Dietary Aide (DA) confirmed the [NAME] double door fridge inside temperature was 49 degrees Fahrenheit (F). During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/20/2024 at 9:55 am, the inside temperature of the double…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and act upon a change in condition by notifying the physican of post fall pain for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 4). This resulted in delay of treatment which caused unnecessary pain and suffering. Findings A review of Resident 4 ' s admission record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dysphagia and aphasia following a cerebral infarction (difficulty swallowing and talking following a stroke), muscle weakness, frequent falls at home and dementia. A review of Residents 4 ' s admission notes on 6/29/24 at 1:24 pm, by a Licensed Nurse (LN) indicated resident had no pain on admission. A review of Resident 4 ' s nursing progress note dated 7/1/24 at 5:06 am, indicated Resident 4 had an unwitnessed fall at 4:45 am on 7/1/24. Resident 4 was found on the floor with wet brief twisted around his feet. LN documented Resident 4 had a new injury of skin tear between left thumb and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a Person-Centered baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission to meet the resident's immediate needs for one of the 6 sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure placed Resident 4's health at risk when resident's person centered care plan was not created upon admission. Findings: A review of Resident 4 ' s admission record stated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include frequent falls, dysphagia and aphasia following a cerebral infarction (difficulty swallowing and talking following a stroke), muscle weakness, and dementia. A record review of Resident 4 ' s care plans, no baseline care plan was found in the record for the first admission on [DATE] for fall prevention, there was a baseline care plan on his readmission on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and clinical record review for Resident 4 with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 12/18/24 at 10:10 am, DON was unable to find documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility to ensure one of six residents (Resident 4) had a plan of care to meet his pain management needs after a fall with substantial injury. This resulted in untreated severe pain and a delay in treatment. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy titled, Pain management, revised November 2016, indicated: Facility staff will help the resident attain or maintain their highest level of well being while working to prevent or manage the resident ' s pain to the extent possible. Procedure includes a licensed nurse will assess each resident for pain upon admission, quarterly, when there is a new onset of pain, exacerbation of pain, or when there is a change in status. If the Licensed Nurse is unable to determine if the resident's nonverbal cures are related to pain, the nurse will advise the Attending Physician and Interdisciplinary Team {IDT), so that the Attending Physician can consider ordering a trial pain medication to alleviate symptoms or identify another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed the dietary menus and a recipe for a lunch meal when: 1. An unapproved substitute meal was provided without reasonable effort made to ensure nutritional adequacy. 2. A recipe was not followed for creamy rice. This had the potential for all residents not to receive their nutritional requirements to maintain normal body weight. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Menu Operational Manual Procedure, revised 04/01/2014, indicated food service should adhere to the written menu. Substitutions to the menu should be comparable in nutritional value taking into consideration vitamins, minerals, and calories. Substitutions should also be reviewed by the Dietary Manager and Dietitian for appropriateness per the diet order and recorded on Form A - Substitution List. 1. During a concurrent observation, interview and record review on 11/08/24 at 12:10 pm, a meal tray line was observed. A review of the menu dated 11/08/2024, indicated baked tilapia, creamy rice, tartar sauce, mixed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that facility air temperatures were at a comfortable level for resident rooms and hallways on Station 2. These failures resulted in residents to feel uncomfortable, tired, horrible, and lost sleep. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Extreme Weather , revised on 01/01/12, indicated that the facility responds to extreme weather in a prompt manner to protect the health and safety of residents. The purpose is to provide residents, visitors, and staff with a comfortable and safe environment during extreme weather. A review of a facility policy titled, 4.6. Extreme Weather - Heat or Cold , undated, indicated it is the policy of the facility to protect residents, staff, and others who may be visiting from harm. The priority of the facility is to minimize stress that the residents could experience from extreme temperatures. To mitigate (to make less severe, serious, or painful), the facility rigorously maintains their systems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to secure urinary catheter tubing for 1 (Resident #12) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheter. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter Care, revised on 06/15/2011, revealed, The catheter will be anchored to prevent excessive tension on the catheter. Review of Resident #12's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/13/2023, with diagnoses to include neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and overactive bladder. Review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/11/2024, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #12's care plan initiated on 01/18/2023, revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter related to a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. On 03/25/2024 at 1:26 PM and on 03/26/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy titled, the facility failed to ensure an as-needed psychotropic medication had a 14-day end date for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Behavior/Psychoactive Drug Management, revised in November 2018, revealed, Any Psychoactive Medication ordered on a prn basis, must be ordered not to exceed 14 days. If the physician feels the medication needs to be continued, he/she must document the reason(s) for the continued usage, and write the order for the medication; not to exceed the 14 day time frame. Review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 07/26/2019, with diagnoses to include anxiety disorder and insomnia. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/14/2024, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to meet this requirement when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received no documented bathing between 12/8/23 and 12/15/23 (seven days). This potentially contributed to Resident 1's several areas of documented skin redness and breakdown. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for repeated falls, encephalopathy (brain dysfunction), muscle weakeness, arthritis, and weakness. A review of the facility ' s record titled, Showers and Bathing, revised 1/1/12, indicated, a tub or shower bath is given to residents to provide cleanliness, comfort, and to prevent body odors. The record further indicated, Residents are given a tub or shower bath unless contraindicated, and observe the skin during the bath. A review of the facility ' s record titled, ADL report, looking back at the dates 12/7/23 to 12/18/23, indicated not applicable under bathing on the following dates: 12/8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 12/15/23. Similarly,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Skin Integrity Management policy and procedure when two out of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), had wounds and the facility had not followed procedures as outlined in their policy. 1a. Resident 1 had a chronic (occurring for a long time, more than three months), infected chest wound and there were no wound measurements (written measurement that described the length, width, and depth of the wound) documented in the medical record; and 1b. Resident 1 had a chronic, infected chest wound and two weekly wound assessments did not include the effectiveness of the current treatment when the Licensed Nurse (LN) inaccurately documented there was no wound; and 1c. Resident 1 had a chronic, infected chest wound and there was no Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of heath care professionals who met to discuss and make recommendations about resident care to evaluate if the resident was meeting their goals) meeting notes. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to respond timely to resident's request and treat resident with dignity and respect for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 lying in feces for a long period of time and upsetting Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart disease, diabetes (high blood sugar), and difficulty in walking. Resident 1 was determined to be capable of making her own healthcare decisions on 7/22/2023. Resident 1 was discharged on 9/13/2023. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/29/2023, the MDS indicated that Resident 1 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 11, at section C Cognitive Patterns indicating that her cognition was moderately impaired. During a review of Resident 1's MDS at section G - Functional Status, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and the physician orders to prevent Pressure Ulcers/Injuries (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device), revise individualized care plan and provide treatment for the pressure injury wound for one of three sampled (Resident 1). These failures could have the potential to delay the wound healing and increased the risk of infection. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Pressure Injury and Skin Integrity Treatment , dated 8/12/2016, the P&P indicated, Treatments to pressure injuries and other skin integrity problems will be provided as ordered by the physicians , Treatments administered will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record , and Update the resident's Care Plan as necessary. During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 2 was free from abuse when Resident 1 yelled at him aggressively, threatened him verbally and grabbed his arm. This resulted in Resident 2 to fear further encounters with Resident 2 and had the potential to put all residents in the facility at risk for abuse. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Prevention, Screening, and Training Program, dated July 2018, indicated that abuse was defined as the willful, deliberate infliction of injury, intimidation, mistreatment, punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. It also indicated ' Willful ' , as related to abuse, is defined as the individual acting deliberately (not inadvertent or accidental) and not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The Abuse policy outlined preventions for abuse, and The facility identifies, corrects, and intervenes in situations in which abuse, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to address Resident 1's dementia behavior care needs. This failure resulted in resident-to-resident altercation when Resident 1 verbally and physically abused Resident 2. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Behavior Management, dated 1/16/22, it indicated the facility will ensure that when a resident displays a mental disorder, psychosocial adjustment difficulties .they will receive appropriate treatment to address the problem and attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial wellbeing. It also indicated possible non-pharmacological interventions for the IDT to consider, including Environmental conditions: adjust room temperature, decrease noise level, move resident from crowded room, offer soft music, approach resident calmly. During a review of admission record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, mood disturbance, and anxiety.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy and treat four residents (two confidential residents and Resident's 6 and 39) with dignity and respect. This caused the residents to feel humiliation, embarrassment, a loss of dignity, and frustration while using the toilet. Findings: During a confidential interview on 5/25/2021 at 10:35 am, two Residents stated a concern regarding shared bathrooms. A resident stated that the door cannot be locked in the bathroom, and that when the bathroom is being used, the door frequently gets opened, both by other residents and by staff. A resident stated that most often it is staff coming in to either get gloves or dump something down the sink. A different resident stated that when staff knocks on the door, it is frequently a knock on the door and then the door gets opened. The resident stated that sometimes they wait for a response before opening the door, but not always. The one resident stated a feeling of humiliation when having a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents and hazards when: 1. Door closures were not maintained or closing properly. This had the potential for residents to be injured in doorways if not prepared for the swift door closures. 2. Smoking area had multiple cigarette butts near dry leaves in 2 locations. This had the potential to result in a fire close to the building. 3. Resident 4 had more than 30 falls in the last 12 months and Resident 211 had five unwitnessed falls in a two month period. This had the potential to place these resident at risk for continued falls and serious life threatening injuries. Findings: 1. Resident injury caused by broken door closer During a review of a radiology report for Resident 29, dated 05/21/2021 at 1:16 pm, it was noted that Resident 29 had an x-ray (images of internal tissues, bones, and organs) of her left hand that indicated two fractures (partial or complete break in a bone) of her second and third…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were provided to meet residents shower needs. This had the potential for residents to not receive showers as scheduled or requested which could negatively affect their physical and emotional well-being. Findings: During a record review of resident shower logs, dated 04/19/2021 on the evening shift, it was noted that a certified nursing assistant (CNA S) documented, Due to being short-staffed, CNAs did not have enough time on PM shift to get any showers done. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 05/24/21 9:30 am, Resident 7 was observed lying in bed under a blanket, without a shirt on. Resident 7 stated, I only have briefs on, I'm naked because I'm waiting for a shower. During an interview with a certified nursing assistant (CNA G), on 05/24/21 12:15 pm, CNA G stated she asked Resident 7 to remove his clothes in preparation for a shower at 8:00 am, but did not get around to giving the resident a shower until 11:00 am because she was busy taking care of other residents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe and effective use of medication when the policy for Medication Storage was not implemented for two sampled Residents (11 and 410) as evidence by the following: 1. Insulin Pen, (a device for insulin administration; insulin is injected to control blood sugar for patients with uncontrolled blood sugar), for Resident 11, remained available for use, after the expiration date 5/13/2021. 2. Eye drops (a lubricant used to keep the eye moist also known as artificial tears) for Resident 410, also had the expiration date as 5/13/2021, and it was available for use. This failure resulted in putting both Resident (11 and 410) at increased risk of harm from receiving expired and potentially contaminated or ineffective medications. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 11's record, indicated, she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (it is a disease that occurs when the blood sugar is too high.), heart problem and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the irregularity of significant medication error that continued for five months for one out of seven sampled residents (Resident 56). Pantoprazole 40 mg was administered instead of 20 mg to Resident 56 from 12/27/2020 to 5/26/2021 (refer to F 760). There was no documented evidence that the error was not identified or reported. This failure resulted in Resident 56 receiving double the dose of pantoprazole for more than five months. Findings: A review of Resident 56's record, indicated, she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart , kidney and swallowing problems. She is her own health care decision maker. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Drug Regimen Review revised on 12/2016, indicated, Facility must ensure that a pharmacist reviews each resident's medical chart every month and perform a drug regiment review, including the following expanded requirements: A. Report any irregularities to the facility's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of seven sampled residents (Resident 56) was free from unnecessary drugs. Resident 56 received an excessive dose of medication intended to reduce stomach acid (pantoprazole). This failure resulted in Resident 56 was administered double the ordered does (40 milligrams instead of 20) of pantoprazole for five months and put this Resident at increased risk of harm. Findings: A review of Resident 56's record, indicated, she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart, kidney and swallowing problem. She is her own health care decision maker. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Drug Regimen Review- Procedure - (IV). Unnecessary Drugs - revised on 12/2016, indicated: Each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug is any drug when used - A. In excessive dose (including duplicate drug therapy); . A review of Resident 56's record on 5/26/2021 at 9:15 am, showed a physician order,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven residents (Resident 30) is free from unnecessary psychotropic drug, which affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior . Resident 30 continued to receive Lexapro (a medication used for depression) for six months, in the absence of clinical indication to do so. This failure resulted in Resident 30 receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication and put the resident at increased risk for drug related side effects and potential harm. Findings: A review of Resident 30's record, indicated, she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including breast cancer, major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and heart problem. She is not her own health care decision marker. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Behavior/Psychoactive Drug Management - Intervention - (B), Psychoactive Drug Interventions - Provision for Psychoactive Medication Use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication error for five months, when one out of seven sampled residents (Resident 56) was given pantoprazole 40 mg /tab without a physician order. (pantoprazole reduces the amount of acid the stomach makes. It's used for heartburn, acid reflux.) This failure resulted in Resident 56 having been given the wrong dose of pantoprazole from 12/27/2020 to 5/26/2021, and put the resident at increased risk of potential harm. Findings: A review of Resident 56's record, indicated, she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart, kidney and swallowing problems. She is her own health care decision maker. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Medication - Administration (1)(A)(ii) revised on 1/1/2012, indicated, Medications and treatments will be administered as prescribed to ensure compliance with dose guidelines. During an observation of medication administration for Resident 56 on 5/26/2021 at 8:45 am,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance committee (QAA) failed to identify and implement plans of actions to correct deficiencies when: 1. Fall intervention strategies to reduce injuries and falls were not implemented. Refer to F 689. 2. There was not sufficient staffing to provide activities of daily living (showers) and supervision to prevent accidents and hazards. Refer to F 725. 3. Infection Control policies did not meet current standards and staff had not implemented the procedures. Refer to F 880. 4. Building maintenance for air conditioning, shower room water and room temperatures, and monitoring door closure issues was not done. Refer to F 689, F 921. These failures had the potential to put all residents at risk for injury and to be exposed to infectious disease. Findings: Record review of the facility policy, titled, Abuse - Prevention, Screening, & Training Program, revised 7/1/2018, showed its purpose was to address the health, safety, welfare, dignity and respect of residents by preventing abuse and neglect. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that provided a safe and sanitary environment for residents and staff when: 1. Staff did not follow facility hand hygiene and isolation policies/procedures while providing care to Resident 260 who was on contact precautions. 2. Resident 260, who was being ruled out for C.diff (Clostridioides difficile, a germ that causes severe diarrhea and inflammation of the colon) infection, was not cohorted in a manner to prevent risk of spread. 3. N95 respirator fit testing was not completed for five of six sampled staff. 4. Facility infection control plan and infection control policies/procedures were not reviewed annually as required. 5. Terminal cleaning of room previously occupied by Resident 260, was completed while occupied by Resident 260's former roommate Resident 21. 6. Staff did not follow facility policy for cleaning blood glucometer (a medical device used for determining the approximate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for residents when: 1. Door closures were not maintained and closed abruptly. This failure resulted in two fractured fingers for Resident 29). 2. Air conditioning unit were not functioning in the resident dining room. This failure resulted in above normal (over 81 degrees F, Fahrenheit) room temperatures in the dining room. 3. Shower room water temperatures and shower room air temperatures were not maintained at a comfortable temperature. This failure resulted in residents refusing showers due to cold water and room air temperatures in shower rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]; 4. Shower heads were not maintained in an operable condition. This failure had the potential to contribute to residents refusing showers. 5. Maintain clean and sanitary shower rooms/stalls. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of bacteria, viruses and fungal infections among the residents and potentially contribute to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide rehabilitative care services for one resident (Resident 33). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 33 to lose strength and balance for walking, which could have led to a loss of independence and increased risk for falls. Findings: A review of Resident 33's clinical record showed admission to the facility on 4/5/2021 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a long-term disease that caused a loss of intellectual function) and depression. Resident 33's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized resident assessment) showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS--a screening tool used in nursing homes to assess intellectual function) score of 10, which indicated moderately impaired function. Resident 33 had been living in a facility owned by the same company since 11/8/2018, and was transferred to the present facility with existing physician orders on 4/5/2021. During an interview on 5/27/2021, at 4:34 pm, the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with personal hygiene and grooming when: 1. Three residents (Residents 15, 17, and 49) refused to shower because too cold. 2. One resident (Resident 46) had dry, scaly skin and jagged, dirty fingernails. This failure had the potential to have caused the residents to experience discomfort and anxiety from poor hygiene and fear of the cold, as well as to promote the risk of infection due to the spread of bacteria from beneath the fingernails. Findings: 1. A record review of the shower record (a document that indicated bathing occurred and how it was tolerated. Also, provided documentation that skin was observed) provided by the facility for the month of April 2021, indicated that 47 showers were refused by the residents. Most of the sheets did not indicate reason for refusal, but some did state, too cold. A record review of the shower record for Resident 15, dated 4/12/2021, indicated that the resident refused to shower three times when offerred by two different Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) because,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$34,573 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $4,235 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $10,586 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Creek Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Coral Cove Post AcuteLong Beach, CA 1 of 5East Terrace Rehabilitation & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Four Seasons Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Hawthorne Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPHawthorne, CA 1 of 5Los Feliz Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Mar Vista Country Villa Healthcare & WellnessLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Oakwood Healthcare CenterChico, CA 1 of 5Pioneers Memorial Skilled Nursing CenterBrawley, CA 1 of 5Plaza Healthcare CenterSanta Ana, CA 2 of 5Anaheim PointAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Bay Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Claremont Heights Post AcuteClaremont, CA 2 of 5Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Fortuna Rehabilitation And Wellness Center, LPFortuna, CA 2 of 5Granada Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Montecito Heights Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Pasadena Park Healthcare And Wellness CenterPasadena, CA 2 of 5San Rafael Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPSan Rafael, CA 2 of 5Tulare Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPTulare, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post Acute CareLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5York Healthcare & Wellness CentreLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Alhambra Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPAlhambra, CA 3 of 5Bay Marina Post AcuteOakland, CA 3 of 5Monterey Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRosemead, CA 3 of 5Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPOntario, CA 3 of 5Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Pavilion On Pico Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Princeton Manor Healthcare Center, LLCOakland, CA 3 of 5Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 4 of 5Ivy Creek Healthcare & Wellness CentreSan Gabriel, CA 4 of 5Kings Healthcare & Wellness Center LPHanford, CA 4 of 5Pine Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPSan Gabriel, CA 4 of 5River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRedding, CA 4 of 5West Hollywood Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPVisalia, CA 5 of 5North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPFresno, CA 5 of 5Oxnard Manor Healthcare CenterOxnard, CA 5 of 5West Pico Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2014
GARRETSON, CHARLESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2014
STONE, JANETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2025
CHICO TERRACE WELLNESS GP LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/01/2014
CHICO TERRACE-LET LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$615K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 36%Other / private 10%

This home reported $615K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$440per resident / day
operating cost
$13,389per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$422per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055516. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next