Pine Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP
126 N. San Gabriel Blvd., San Gabriel, CA 91775 · For profit - Partnership · 75 certified beds · (626) 285-3131 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 0.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.92 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.84 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 195 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 121 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.83 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.7%CMS range 41.8–54.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 8.2–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.9%CMS range 6.9–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.72 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 69.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services were completed for five (5) of 5 sampled nursing staff in accordance with the facility assessment and policy and procedures (P&P). This deficient practice has the potential to result in an increased risk for improper care provided to the residents which could negatively affect the residents' overall wellbeing.Findings:During a concurrent review and interview on 3/18/2026 at 2PM with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Certified Nurse Assistant 1's (CNA 1) employee records were reviewed. The DSD stated CNA 1 was hired on 2/13/2025. The DSD stated the facility form titled Facility Support Assistant Onboarding Activities and Skills Observation Checklist is used to evaluate the competency of CNAs' skills upon hire. The DSD stated the skills competency log includes, but is not limited to, evaluating CNAs on activities of daily living, vital signs, feeding techniques, and residents' rights. The DSD verified that CNA 1's Facility Support Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage was properly disposed of in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled, Waste Management. This deficient practice had the potential to attract pests and rodents and may cause disease and other health issues to residents, staff, and the community.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/16/2026 at 8:01 AM with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the facility's parking lot, two lidless/uncovered trash bins with wheels were filled with bags of trash placed next to three dumpsters. DS stated the two trash bins were filled with nursing trash and were not covered and the two trash bins should be covered. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/19/2026 at 9:35 AM with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the facility's Waste Management policy and procedure (P&P) dated 4/21/2022 was reviewed. The P&P indicated dispose of all regulated or potentially regulated waste, close and dispose regulated waste according to state and federal regulations and dispose bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure vital (objective, measurable indicators of the body's most essential physiological functions, used to evaluate physical health, monitor illness, which includes blood pressure) were documented accurately for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 5 and 82) reviewed for dialysis. This failure resulted in the facility not documenting blood pressure readings were taken in the correct arm for Residents 5 and 82 which can lead to potential harm and/ or injury to the residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure), and dependence on renal dialysis (hemodialysis; a life-sustaining medical treatment that filters waste products, toxins and excess fluids from the blood when the kidneys have failed). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement water testing samples (to collect and deliver for analysis a sample of water representative of the bulk of water being examined) to initially validate the facility's water management program control measures (actions that can be taken to reduce the potential of exposure to a hazard) to ensure the facility's water was free of waterborne (carried or transmitted by water and especially by drinking water) pathogens (any organism that can cause disease) such as legionella (a bacterium which cases legionnaires' disease [a severe form of pneumonia - lung inflammation usually caused by infection]). This failure resulted in the facility having no initial baseline validation for their water management program and had the potential to place the residents in the facility at risk for developing severe respiratory infection (pneumonia).Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/17/2026 at 12:10 PM with Property Manager (PM) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence or written notice of why a room change was required and failed to accommodate the request to be roomed together as a married couple from 5/5/2025 to 7/21/2025 for two (2) of 19 sampled residents (Residents 43 and 44) when they did not in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Rights. This failure resulted in violation of Residents 43 and 44 right to be notified of the reason why they needed to change rooms and had the potential to result in Residents 43 and 44 feeling sad, lonely and abandoned.1. During a review of Resident 43's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paraplegia (the loss of movement and sensation in the lower half of the body, including both legs) and generalized (widespread) muscle weakness (decreased ability to use your muscles, making daily activities feel like they require extra effort).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 34) reviewed for restraint (restricting freedom of movement) was free from physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that is attached or adjacent to the resident's body; cannot be removed easily by the resident; and restricts the resident's freedom of movement or normal access to his/her body) by failing to conduct an assessment for the use of wheelchair and bed alarm (monitoring devices used in healthcare settings to detect when a person attempts to rise, triggering an alert for caregivers). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 34's physical and psychological wellbeing and quality of life.Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record, the admission Record indicated an original admission to the facility on 3/9/2022, and readmission on [DATE]. Resident 34's diagnoses included difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 9) to reflect the antipsychotic (drug that works by altering brain chemistry to help reduce psychotic symptoms like hallucinations [an experience which a person sees, hears, feels, or smells something that does not exist], delusions [fixed false beliefs], and disordered thinking) medication taken and Antipsychotic Medication Review (a structured, interprofessional evaluation of a resident's antipsychotic drug therapy to assess effectiveness, monitor side effects, and determine the need for continued use, dose reduction, or withdrawal). This deficient practice had the potential for the facility not to develop and implement an individualized care plan (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident that includes measurable objectives, interventions and timeframes to meet a resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1) meal trays that were appetizing and palatable (agreeable to one's sense of taste). This failure had the potential to result in dissatisfaction, decreased food intake and placed Resident 1 at risk for unplanned weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type two (2) diabetes mellitus (DM2; a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with ketoacidosis (a life-threatening, emergency complication of DM occurring when the body lacks enough insulin [a hormone that acts as a key, unlocking cells to allow sugar {glucose} from food to enter and provide energy] to use glucose for energy) without coma (a state of deep, prolonged unconsciousness where a person is alive but unable to wake up, more, or respond to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its hospice (care designed to give supportive care to people in the final phase of a terminal illness and focus on comfort and quality of life, rather than cure) agreement to coordinate care for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 42) reviewed for hospice by failing to develop an effective communication process for Resident 42's plan of care, hospice visitation, and physician's orders. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 42 not to receive the hospice care and services necessary to promote comfort and quality of life.Findings:During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated an admission to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 42's diagnoses included aortic aneurysm (a dangerous, balloon-like bulge or weak spot in the wall of the aorta [the body's main artery that carries blood from the heart to the rest of the body], heart disease (any condition that affects the heart's structure or function,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 83) reviewed for environment was within reach.This failure had the potential to put Resident 83 at risk for experiencing a delay in receiving assistance from facility staff which could lead to a fall or accident and unmet needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 83's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (the lasting physical, cognitive [ability to think, remember and reason] or emotional impairments that remain after a stroke [blocked blood flow to the brain])and generalized (widespread) muscle weakness (decreased ability to use your muscles, making daily activities feel like they require extra effort). During a review of Resident 83's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 3/13/2026, the H&P indicated the resident had mild…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 39 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent sexual abuse (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) on 2/11/2026 in the facility's hallway. On 2/11/2026, Visitor (Visitor 1) witnessed Resident 2's hand was inside Resident 1's pants. This failure can result in Resident 1 and 2 experiencing emotional trauma (response to deeply distressing or disturbing events) or psychological trauma (damage to the mind that occurs as a result of a severely distressing event).Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included dementia (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles in the blood), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The admission Record indicated Resident 1 was not self- responsible and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate intervention such as bed alarm (a safety device, often for the elderly or those with dementia, that alerts caregivers when a person tries to get out of bed), to monitor/document sleeping pattern and inform the resident's physician of any insomnia (trouble falling asleep or staying asleep) or anxiety (natural feeling of worry, fear, or unease, often a physical and emotional reaction) for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) who was assessed as at risk for fall. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fall in the resident's room on 12/31/2025 around 5:30 AM. Resident 1 was found on the floor on the right side of the bed and was assessed to have a small abrasion (a superficial skin injury, also known as a scrape) measuring 2 centimeters (cm, unit of measurement) on the left forehead.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic time- out (ATO-a structured process where healthcare providers review and assess the need for ongoing antibiotic therapy) was completed within 48 to 72 hours for two (2) of three (3) sample residents (Residents 1 and 3), sampled for antibiotic use, as indicated in the facility's policy. These failures had the potential to result in Residents 1 and 3 to receive unnecessary antibiotic therapy with the risk of creating antibiotic resistance (bacteria develop and resist the effects of the antibiotics used to kill them).Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (CKD - longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system) and enterocolitis (inflammation [the body's response to an illness, injury or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' room temperature level between 71 to 81-degree Fahrenheit (° F-a unit of temperature measurement on the Fahrenheit scale, where water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit and boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit) for three (3) of eleven (11) sampled residents (Resident 126, Resident 63, and Resident 36). This deficient practice resulted in the resident's increased level of discomfort and had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life. Findings: 1. During a review of the admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 126 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but not limited to nondisplaced fracture (a broken bone where the pieces of the bone remain aligned) of greater trochanter (a bony projection on the upper part) of right femur (thing bone), subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (encounters after the patient has received active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food service area was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and proper food handling was provided in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure(P&P) by failing to: 1.Ensure one can opener was sanitized and was not rusted (a reddish-brown substance that forms on the surface of iron and steel as a result of reacting with air and water) according to the facility's P&P titled, Can Opener Use and Cleaning. 2.Ensure [NAME] non- stick spray oil was properly covered with a lid. 3. Ensure cheese stored in the refrigerator was labeled with an open date or use by date (a calendar date that indicates when a product is best quality) and in a sealed container. These deficient practices have the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness ([food poisoning] with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever) and can lead to other serious medical complications and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of 3 dumpsters (a movable waste container designed to be brought and taken away) were closed and not overflowing, in accordance with the facility's Waste Management.Policy and Procedure. This deficient practice had a potential to attract vermin (animals that are believed to be harmful, carry diseases such as rodents, parasitic worms, or insects), pests (any living thing that has a negative effect on humans), and wildlife (undomesticated animal species) and may cause disease and other health issues to residents, staff, and the community. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/5/2025 at 6:40 AM with the Dietary Supervisor (DC), in the facility's parking lot, 3 dumpsters were observed. The dumpsters were overflowing with personal protective equipment (PPE- is equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses) and kitchen trash. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/2025 at 8:50 AM with DC, DC stated one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures as indicated on the facility policy when facility failed to establish and maintain an effective water management program to prevent the development and transmission of Legionnaire's disease (LD, a serious and often deadly form of lung infection [pneumonia, lung inflammation usually caused by infection], acquired by breathing in water droplets caused by the bacteria, legionella [the bacteria that causes LD]). This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk for developing severe respiratory infection (pneumonia). Findings: During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 10:26 AM with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS stated that the way the facility control legionella at the facility is through their control measures and that to his knowledge, the facility does not do any sort of testing for legionella. During an interview on 2/6/2025 at 10:56 AM with MS, MS stated that they do not test for legionella. MS stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain safe, clean, comfortable sanitary and home like environment for two (2) of 11 sampled residents (Residents 15 and 23) by failing to: 1. Ensure the bedside control (used to adjust the bed height, head of bed and/ or foot of the bed) wires for Residents 15 and 23 were not exposed (occur when the insulation around electrical cords and cables is frayed or damaged, revealing the wires within). 2. Facility failed to ensure the trash cans were not overflowing for Rooms A, B and C. These deficient practices caused an unsanitary and had a potential for residents to be placed at risk for serious illness and/ or injury. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 23's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included muscle weakness, anemia (a condition that develops when your blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy red blood cells), history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for Resident 36's needs and preferences with a wheelchair that was comfortable for his size, was not damaged, ripped, dusty and old. This failure had the potential for Resident 36 to be placed at risk for negative impact of his psychosocial wellbeing, result in delayed provision of services and/or risk for injury. Findings: During a review of the admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 36 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but not limited to polyneuropathy (damage or disease affecting peripheral nerves in roughly the same areas on both sides of the body, featuring weakness, numbness, and burning pain), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy (a chronic condition where the body has trouble using sugar [glucose] from food properly and as a complication of the diabetes, there is nerve damage affecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents 66 and 225) were provided a communication board (a device that displays photos, symbols or illustrations to help people with limited language skills express themselves) that was readily accessible in the language the residents understood. This failure had the potential to result in Residents 66 and 225 experiencing a delay in receiving appropriate care and treatment and feeling misunderstood due to the staff not being able to properly communicate with the resident. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 66's admission Record, admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (a group of brain disorders that cause a gradual decline in cognitive abilities such as memory, thinking, reasoning and judgement) and muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength that makes it hard to move muscles). During a review of Resident 66's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming services for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 53 and Resident 57) who were dependent with activities of daily living (ADLs- are activities related to personal care that include bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating), in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 53 and 57's unkempt and dirty fingernails potentially leading to skin injury, infection, and scarring. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 53's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 53 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 53's Annual History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/17/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 53…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of six sampled residents (Resident 64) by failing to administer the resident's amlodipine 5 mg (milligrams - unit of measure, used to treat high blood pressure) one tablet and Vitamin C 500 mg one tablet, as indicated on the physician order. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 64 at risk of uncontrolled blood pressure, heart attack, or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, cardiomegaly (an enlarged heart), heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), and diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood [high blood glucose]. During a review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool), dated 11/27/24, indicated Resident 64 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five percent (5%). There were two (2) medication errors (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order/manufacturer's specifications/accepted professional standards and principles) out of 25 opportunities (observed administered medications) for error which yielded a facility medication error rate of 7.69% for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents (Resident 64) observed during medication administration (med pass). 2 medications were not given within one hour from the scheduled 9 a.m. time. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 64 at risk of uncontrolled blood pressure, heart attack, or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, cardiomegaly (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove expired Osmolite 1.5 Cal (therapeutic nutrition that provide complete balanced nutrition for long- or short-term tube feeding for residents with increased calorie and protein needs.) from one (1) of two (2) Medication Rooms (Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]) located at nurse station 2. This deficient practice increased the risk for residents to receive nutrition that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage which could possibly lead to health complications resulting in harm and hospitalization. Findings: During an observation of the medication room with the Director Staff Development (DSD) on [DATE] at 2:23 PM, one (1) bottle of Osmolite 1.5 Cal was observed with the expiration date of [DATE]. During the same concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 2:43 PM, DSD stated, There should not be any expired enteral feeding bottle left in the medication room because if a licensed staff accidently administered it to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a coordination of care between the facility and hospice (a program that provides are and support for people who are nearing the end of their life) staff for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 64) in accordance with the facility's hospice program by not ensuring: a. Hospice staff visit progress notes were maintained in Resident 64's medical record. b. Hospice staff were signing in on their flow sheet in Resident 64's hospice binder. This failure resulted in Resident 64's medical record being inaccurate which had the potential for Resident 64 to not receive the required hospice care and services necessary to promote comfort and quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dissection of ascending aorta (a life-threatening condition where the inner layer of the ascending aorta [the part of heart that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 17 sampled residents (Residents 8 and 44) had their call light (device used by residents to call staff) within reach. This failure placed Residents 8 and 44 at risk for experiencing a delay in receiving assistance from facility staff which could lead to a fall or accident. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (DM2; a disease in which one's blood sugar levels are too high) and dementia (a group of brain disorders that cause a gradual decline in cognitive abilities such as memory, thinking, reasoning and judgement). During a review of Resident 8's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 11/20/2024, the H&P indicated the resident does not have the capacity to make their own decisions. During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from the use of physical restraints (any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) in accordance with the facility policy. On 10/3/24, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 3 wrapped Resident 1's torso (the main part of the body that contains the chest, stomach, pelvis, and back) with a white sheet as an abdominal binder (a wide compression belt that encircles the stomach) preventing resident's normal access to his torso. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's physical and psychological wellbeing and quality of life. Cross reference with F609. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Records indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the suspected abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) and physical restraint (any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) of resident to the long-term care (LTC) ombudsman (advocates for residents of nursing homes), Law Enforcement, and State Survey Agency State Survey Agency within 2 hours after the allegation oh physical restraint occurred for one of two sample residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's Restraint prevention policy by failing. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1at risk for further abuse and delay of investigation. Cross reference with F604. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the Resident's/ Resident's responsible parties' right to have a written information on how to formulate an Advanced Directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Resident 4 and 12) for advance directive care area. 1. Resident 4 did not have an advanced directive or a signature declining information on how to obtain an advanced directive. 2. Resident 12 did not have a copy of advance directive filed under the advance directive tab in the resident's physical medical chart where staff can access during a medical emergency. This deficient practice had the potential for violating Residents 4 and 12 choices about their medical care. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's face sheet indicated Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss mattress (LAL mattress, designed to prevent and treat pressure injury/ ulcer [localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue caused by prolonged pressure]) was set up accurately for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 12 and Resident 16) for pressure ulcer care area. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to worsen or develop new pressure injury. Findings: 1. A review of the admission record indicated Resident 12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), gangrene (death of body tissue due to a lack of blood flow or a serious bacterial infection), peripheral vascular disease (the reduced circulation of blood to a body part other than the brain or heart), pressure ulcer (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue) of sacral region (tailbone). A review of Resident 12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a clean [NAME] Valve (a stopcock-like device, which allows the health care worker to access enteral systems without breaking open the lines) for gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 34). This deficient practice had the potential to result in complications including infections and stomach discomfort. Findings: A review of Resident 34's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 34 on 2/12/2019 with diagnosis which include muscle weakness, sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection) and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). A review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 2/2/2024, indicated Resident 34 was severely impaired with cognitive (processes of thinking and reasoning) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 34 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy (treatment that provides supplemental, or extra oxygen) and necessary respiratory care services for three (3) of 3 sampled residents (Resident 4, 125, and 224) for oxygen care area in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. Resident 4's oxygen humidifier (medical device used to humidify supplemental oxygen) and nasal cannula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into your nose) tubing were not on the floor. Resident 4's oxygen concentrator was also left on when Resident 4 was not on oxygen therapy. 2. Resident 125 did not receive oxygen as indicated on the physician's order. 3. Resident 224's nasal cannula tubing and humidified sterile water was not properly labeled. These deficient practices had the potential to cause complications associated with oxygen therapy and increase the risk of infection to Residents 4, 125, and 224. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent food contamination and the spread of foodborne illness as indicated on the facility policy when the facility failed to ensure: 1. The sanitary storage and disposal of expired food. These deficient practices have the potential to result to pathogen (germ) exposure and place residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead to hospitalizations. 2. Seven (7) of 32 kitchen mounted ceiling lights have a protective plastic cover. This deficient practice had the potential of breakage with particles of glass potentially landing on food preparation areas or residents' trays. Findings: During observation on 2/12/2024 at 07:52 AM., in the kitchen were multiple food containers noted with expired date labels. a. A partially covered silver color pan with partially defrosted chicken with expired used by label was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage and refuse (disposable material, which includes both recyclable and non-recyclable material) from the kitchen properly when Dietary Aid was observed dumping four(4) clear bags of kitchen trash on top of the regular facility trash at the the facility's parking area on the North/East side of the facility building on 2/14/2024 This failure had the potential to result in the attraction and spread of vermin (animals that are believe to be harmful, or that carry diseases, e.g., rodents parasitic worms or insects) that could potentially infiltrate the facility, affect the resident care areas and pose a disease threat to residents of the facility. Findings: During an observation on 2/14/2024 at 11:19 A.M. in the kitchen, Dietary Aid (DA) was observed taking out 4 bags of kitchen trash to the the facility's parking area on the North East side of the facility building. DA was observed dumping the trash bags from the kitchen on the ground with the rest of the facility's regular trash that were also pile…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment when multiple piles of trash bags were observed on the ground near the facility's parking area on the North/East side of the facility building. This failure had the potential to result in the attraction and infestation of vermin (wild animals that are believed to be harmful such as rodents, parasitic worms or insects) that could potentially infiltrate the facility, affect resident care areas and pose a direct disease and infection threat to residents. Findings: During an observation on 2/14/2024 at 11:19 A.M., multiple piles of trash bags along with other miscellaneous trash such as a broken folding chair, plastic bucket, two wooden crates, empty cardboard boxes, and a gurney were observed on the ground near the facility's parking lot area on the North/East side of the facility building. There were no trash garbage and refuse (disposable material, which includes both recyclable and non-recyclable material) containers noted at the site. The trash bags were a mixed of regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote respect and dignity for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 34) for dignity care area when resident was left in bed sleeping with food around his mouth and on the resident's gown. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 34's feelings of decreased self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: A review of Resident 34's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 34 on 2/12/2019. Resident 34's diagnoses included muscle weakness, sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). A review of Resident 34's Order Summary Report, dated 4/1/2022, indicated, May have 1:1 feeding assistance with all meals. A review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 2/2/2024, indicated Resident 34 was severely impaired with cognitive (processes of thinking and reasoning) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 34 required partial /moderate assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and implemented for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 174). This deficient practice placed Resident 174 at risk of not having goals and interventions to fulfill resident's needs which had the potential to negatively affect Resident 174's well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 174's admission Record, indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI), bacteremia, and Klebsiella Pneumoniae (infections commonly occur among sick patients in healthcare settings who are receiving treatment for other conditions). A review of Resident 174's History and Physical, dated 2/08/24, indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 174's electronic medical records on 2/13/2024 at 3 PM, with Minimum Data Set Nurse 2 (MDSN 2), MDSN 2 stated Resident 174 did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan (a formal process that correctly identifies existing needs and recognizes a resident's potential needs or risks to achieve healthcare outcomes) for two (2) of 20 sampled Residents (Resident 4 and 18) as indicated on the facility's policy. 1. Resident 4's oxygen therapy order was not revised on 2/12/2024 when order was changed to as needed from continuous use. 2. Resident 18's care plan to prevent injury was not revised when Resident 18 was non compliant with the use of soft helmet (a special kind of protective headgear that is designed to reduce the risk or severity of head injuries for residents with epilepsy (a disorder of the brain characterized by repeated seizures [abnormal brain activity]). This deficient practice had the potential for inconsistency of care being rendered for Residents 4 and 18, which could affect over all well-being. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's face sheet indicated Resident 4 was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one (1) to 1 feeding assistance (help residents in a nursing facility eat and drink) while eating for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 34) for ADL care area, as indicated on the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 34's functional ability to decline, suffer a weight loss, and risk for accident such as choking, which coould result to harm. Findings: A review of Resident 34's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 34 on 2/12/2019. Resident 34's diagnoses included muscle weakness, sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). A review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 2/2/2024, indicated Resident 34 was severely impaired with cognitive (processes of thinking and reasoning) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 34 required partial /moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with eating. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to elevate bilateral lower extremities (BLE, everything from your hip to your toes, including your hip, thigh, knee, leg, ankle, foot, and toes) and implement care plan for one of 20 sampled (Resident 224). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in reducing the swelling in the affected extremities. Findings: A review of Resident 224's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 224 on 2/1/2024 with diagnosis which include muscle weakness, difficulty in walking and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 224's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 2/8/2024, indicated Resident 224 was moderately impaired with cognitive (processes of thinking and reasoning) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 224 was substantial/ maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or hold trunks or limbs and provide more than half the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to ensure the safety of one of two sampled residents (Resident 18) by not ensuring Resident 18 was wearing a soft helmet (a special kind of protective headgear that is designed to reduce the risk or severity of head injuries for people with epilepsy [uncontrolled shaking] ) and that had side rails remained padded (provides added cushioning to help reduce injuries). This failure had the potential to cause injury to Resident 18 during seizures (uncontrollable shaking). Findings: A review of Resident 18's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 18 on 5/1/2023 with diagnosis which include muscle weakness, epilepsy and lack of coordination. A review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 10/22/2023, indicated Resident 18 was severely impaired with cognitive (processes of thinking and reasoning) skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 18 required partial /moderate assistance (helper does more than half of the effort) on oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove an intravenous (IV, within the vein) catheter saline lock (a thin plastic tube that is threaded into a vein, flushed with saline, and then capped off for later use) used in the administration of parenteral fluid (delivery of fluid or medication through an IV, subcutaneous [beneath, or under, all the layers of the skin], intramuscular [within or into the muscle] or mucosal [the moist, inner lining of some organs and body cavities] route to maintain adequate hydration, restore and/or maintain fluid volume, establish lost electrolytes [minerals in your blood and other body fluids that carry an electric charge], or provide nutrition which includes total parenteral nutrition [TPN, IV administered nutrition]) and left it inserted for more than 96 hours for one (1) of 20 sampled residents (Resident 174), in accordance with facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to put Resident 174 at risk for developing an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident who required adaptive feeding equipment (modified utensils, accessories, glasses, and plates to help improve residents comfort and independence), utilize a plate guard (unique spill guard which prevents food from accidentally being pushed off the plate) and built up spoon (specialized utensil with built up handle designed to assist residents with limited or weakened grasping strength) during meal, as indicated on the physician's order, for one of one sampled resident (Resident 39) in Activities of Daily Living care area. This deficient practice placed Resident 39 at risk for further decline in physical functioning and decline to perform self-feeding skills. Findings: A review of Resident 39's admission Record indicated the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and got readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infarction (stroke, refers to damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Revised with comments/ questions: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light device (one of the major communication technologies that link nursing home staff to the needs of residents) was within reach (an arm's length) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This had the potential to result in a delay in care for Resident1 not to receive the necessary care and services which can lead to illness or serious injury. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 10/10/2023 with diagnosis which include difficulty in walking, lack of coordination and history of falling. During a review of Resident 1's care plan, titled Care Plan Detail initiated on 10/11/2023, indicated Focus: Potential for injury related to the use of bed rails and one of the interventions was to keep call light within reach. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 10/17/2023, indicated Resident 1 was severely impaired with cognitive (processes of thinking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq.ft. - unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 13 of 35 residents' rooms (Rooms 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23) in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the ability to provide care, safety, and a home-like environment for the residents.Findings: During a tour of the facility on 3/16/2026 at 10 :00 AM, 13 of 35 residents' rooms did not meet the minimum 80 sq. ft. per resident in multiple resident bedrooms. These are Rooms 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/16/2026 at 1:35 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], one resident (Resident 3) was observed sitting on the edge of her bed, about to get up and ambulate with a walker. Resident 3 stated that the space in the room was adequate and that she has a walker, which allows her to move around without difficulty. Resident 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the accurate and complete Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD, refers to the actual hours of work performed per patient day by a direct caregiver) in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure by failing to: 1. Post the nurse staffing information in a prominent location on 2/4/2025. 2. Ensure the Daily Nurse Staffing Form (nurse staffing information) posted on 2/5/2025 was accurate to reflect the correct date and total number of projected hours and the actual hours of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. These deficient practices have the potential for residents and visitors not to be informed of the facility census and staffing. Findings: During initial observation of the facility's entrance and lobby on 2/4/2025 at 8:02 AM, the Nurse Staffing Information, dated 2/4/25 was observed posted only in the red zone (nursing station 1, area for residents tested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 13 of 35 resident rooms (rooms 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft., unit of measurement) per resident in a multiple resident room. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' personal space, decrease freedom of mobility and could compromise the provision of care. Findings: During the initial observation on 2/4/2025 from 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM, Rooms 5, 7, 8, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident. The residents in these rooms were able to ambulate and/or move around in their wheelchairs freely. Nursing staff were observed to have enough space to provide safe quality care and there was enough space for beds, side tables, dressers and other medical equipment. During a review of the facility's room waiver dated 2/4/2025, the facility's room waiver indicated the 13 rooms with three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-02-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing information (list of total number of staff and the actual hours worked by the staff to meet this regulatory requirement) was placed in a visible and prominent place that is readily accessible to the residents and/ or visitors on 2/12/2024 and 2/14/2024. As a result, the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by the staff was not readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 2/12/18 at 7:41 AM, no visible daily nurse staffing information posting was found at the facility lobby or at either one of the two Nursing Stations. During an interview with Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 2/14/2024 at 12:46 PM, DSD stated she was not aware of the location of where the daily nurse staffing information was posted including the facility name, date, census, and the total number of actual hours worked per shift for licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care. During an interview with the Administrator (Admin) on 2/14/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 13 out of 35 rooms (5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in a multiple resident room. This deficient practice has the potential to cause the residents in these rooms not to have enough room for activities of daily living and hinder staff from providing care to the residents. Findings: During the initial observation on 2/12/2024, from 9 AM to 10:20 AM, Rooms 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident. The residents in these rooms were able to ambulate freely and/or maneuver in their wheelchairs freely. Nursing staff had enough space to provide care to these residents with dignity and privacy. There was space for beds, side tables, dressers, and other medical equipment. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 2/12/2024 at 11:15 AM, the DON stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2012 |
| GEDDES, CODY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2024 |
| YAMAWAKI, OLGA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/11/2023 |
| G4 WELLNESS GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2012 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2012 |
| WEISS, JONATHAN | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2019 |
| ERETZ PINE GROVE PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/02/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055056. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.