San Rafael Healthcare & Wellness Center, LP
1601 5th Avenue, San Rafael, CA 94901 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 54 certified beds · (415) 456-7170 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-20)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.82 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.14 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.7%CMS range 48.2–72.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.3–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 85.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 90.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 75.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.3–11.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 52.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and monitor the effectiveness of interventions of a care plan for one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when Resident 1 had a fall on 3/3/25 and the facility did not ensure: 1. A physician's order for Physical Therapy (PT) so Resident 1 could receive PT; 2. Nursing staff documented frequent room checks had been conducted; and, 3. The Pharmacist's recommendations to monitor Resident 1 for behaviors which could be objectively (data or information collected free from biases or opinions) measured and quantified (measured as a numerical value). This failure resulted in another fall on 3/14/25 in which Resident 1 obtained a left intertrochanteric (a bone below the hip joint) fracture (a break) and a T3 (the 3rd bone of the middle spine) fracture that changed Resident 1's mobility from independent to chairbound. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect when staff failed to follow through on requests for assistance for five of six sampled residents, Residents 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6. This failure caused the residents to feel lousy and piss[ed] off and affected the residents' psychosocial well-being.During an interview on 7/1/26 at 12:01 p.m. with Resident 3 and Resident 4, who resided in the same room, Resident 3 stated he waited 20 to 30 minutes for assistance when he pressed his call light, and one time he waited an hour and a half. Resident 3 stated when he was waiting for assistance, he had been incontinent of stool and was sitting in a soiled brief. Resident 3 stated he waited long periods of time for his soiled brief to be changed so often that, he stated, Sadly, I've gotten used to it. Resident 4, stated it made him feel lousy for Resident 3 that staff did not come to help him, and Resident 4 often would go out in the hall and find someone to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, accurate assessment and interventions for one of three sampled residents reviewed for elopements (Resident 1) to prevent the resident from eloping (the act of leaving the facility unsupervised and without prior authorization).These failures resulted in Resident 1 walking three blocks on a busy two lane street and being found wandering on the sidewalk and had the potential to result in serious physical harm or death. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, accurate assessment and interventions for one of three sampled residents reviewed for elopements (Resident 1) to prevent the resident from eloping (the act of leaving the facility unsupervised and without prior authorization).These failures resulted in Resident 1 walking three blocks on a busy two- lane street and being found wandering on the sidewalk and had the potential to result in serious physical harm or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for one resident (Resident 1) of five sampled residents when Resident 1 left the facility unaccompanied and wandered several busy streets until he was found by a friend and driven to his Responsible Party's (RP, a person who makes health care decisions on behalf of the resident when the resident does not have the mental capacity to do so) home.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide supervision and to prevent severe injury to the residents. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of toxic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction from exposure to poisons, chemicals, drugs, or natural toxins, causing altered mental status, confusion, memory loss, personality changes, tremors, and coordination issues, with outcomes varying from reversible to permanent brain damage, depending on exposure).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident 1) of four sampled residents from abuse when Resident 1 wandered into Resident 2's room and became verbally and physically aggressive. This failure resulted in Resident 2 punching Resident 1 in the face when Resident 1 would not leave Resident 2's room after repeated requests.On 7/3/25 at 4:33 p.m., the Department received a report from the facility that indicated, On 7/3/25 at 1:40 p.m. [Resident 1] was observed in [Resident 2's] room by the housekeeper and had to be separated immediately. Upon interviewing [Resident 2], he stated that [Resident 1] came into his room and would not leave. [Resident 1] was standing at the bedside with his hands up in a fist while [Resident 2] was laying down telling him to leave. According to [Resident 2] he struck [Resident 1] in the face and chest.During an observation on 7/16/25 at 1:17 p.m., Resident 1 was walking in the hallway of Station 1. Staff were trying to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure two out of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were treated with respect and dignity when: 1. A call light (a signal that residents in healthcare facilities use to alert staff when they need assistance) was not answered timely by facility staff, and 2. A foley catheter (FC, a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) drainage bag (bag that collects the drained urine) did not have a privacy cover. These failures had the potential to negatively affect residents' sense of dignity and privacy.[AV3] Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May of 2025 with diagnoses including Chronic Pain Syndrome (CPS, pain that lasts longer than three months) and Functional Quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide service aligned with professional standards for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when medication was left unattended on Resident ' s overbed table. This failure had the potential for the medication to be taken by unintended persons with potentially serious consequences. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in May of 2025 with diagnoses including Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 1's care plan (CP, a detailed, written document that outlines a resident's individual needs, goals, and how their care will be managed), date initiated 10/25/24, indicated, The resident requires tube feeding [TF, a medical device used to provide nutrition and medication to people who are unable to swallow safely] r/t [related to] dysphagia . During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/25 at 11:23 a.m., in Resident 1's room, there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to a safe and sanitary environment for three out of five sampled residents when: 1. Toothbrushes found in a shared bathroom were not labeled with the resident names, and 2. Resident's foley catheter (FC, a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) tubing (a thin, flexible tube connected to a catheter that drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag) was on a contaminated surface. These failures put the residents at risk for the transmission of infections. Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/25 at 12:19 p.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) B in Resident 3's and Resident 6's room, verified Resident 3 did not have a toothbrush on or in the bedside table/bedside drawer. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/25 at 12:49 p.m., in the shared bathroom for Resident 3 and Resident 6, Unlicensed Staff D verified there were 2 toothbrushes in the bathroom that were not labeled with names. Unlicensed Staff D stated if the toothbrushes were not labeled with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. An alleged sexual abuse incident on 4/28/25 was reported to the local ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities), the California Department of Public Health (the state) and local law enforcement within 2 hours after the allegation was made, 2. Staff were knowledgeable of the abuse reporting guidelines: whom to report abuse allegations and the time frame for reporting abuse allegations, and 3. The facility ' s Abuse Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Reporting Abuse, revised 1/8/2014, reflects the current reporting guidelines. These failures could put all 52 residents of the facility at risk for abuse without timely interventions. Findings: 1. A review of the Report of suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse, received by the state on 4/28/25 at 12:06 p.m., indicated, .on 4/28/25 at 9:00AM [Resident 2] was getting coffee and greeted [Resident 3]. [Resident 3] responded by saying let ' s go while grabbing [Resident 2 ' s] genital area . and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 3, Resident 4 and Resident 5) could call for staff assistance through a communication system when the call lights (a device that allows residents to signal staff for assistance) were not found within the residents' reach. These failures had the potential to result in residents ' inability to notify staff when needing help and could lead to safety issues. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/23/25 at 12:47p.m, Resident 1 was in her room in bed and her call light was hanging on a dresser in a box. Resident 1 stated she did not know where her call light was. In a concurrent observation and interview on 4/23/25 at 12:50 p.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 entered Resident 1 room, LN 1 confirmed that the call light was not within reach of Resident 1 and that it should have been. During an observation and interview on 4/23/25 at 1:07 p.m., Resident 3 was in her room lying in bed. She gestured, trying to reach the call light but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 ' s pain intensity level was not re-assessed for effectiveness one hour after administration of pain medication administration. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s report of experiencing pain, feeling like she had a ball inside her, while grimacing and holding her hands around her abdomen. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July 2024, with diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome (a condition in which a person experiences pain longer than 3 months), stage IV pressure ulcer (wound with full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone) to sacrum area (lower back area) and recently placed on hospice care (compassionate care for people who are near the end of life provided at the person ' s home or within a health care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the residents' right to be informed of the plan of care when five of nine sampled residents were not told before admission that their physical therapy (treatment that helps improve how the body performs physical movements) would be done via telehealth (health-related services through live video call) or that they would only receive one session per week. This failure caused residents to feel let down, feel that their progress was slower than they expected, and caused Resident 7 and Resident 8 to not participate in physical therapy. Finding: During an observation on 4/3/25 at 10:35 a.m., a staff member donned a gown and gloves at the doorway to Resident 1's room, and then entered the room bringing a walker and an iPad on wheels to Resident 1's bedside. A voice from the iPad gave instructions to Resident 1 to get up from the bed and go for a walk. The staff in the room assisted Resident 1 to get up and put a gait belt on the resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the notice of transfer was sent to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility was not able to provide evidence that the notice of transfer was sent to the Ombudsman. This failure had the potential to put Resident 1 at risk of being inappropriately transferred or discharged from the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 admitted to the facility in November of 2024. During an interview on 3/24/25 at 12:05 p.m., the Social Services Director (SSD) stated a notice of transfer form should have been completed by the nurse when Resident 1 was transferred out of the facility to an emergency department (ED, a hospital facility that provides immediate, unscheduled medical care for those…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect the brain and central nervous system to treat mental health conditions) when prescribed a psychotropic medication without: 1. non-pharmacologic interventions (NPIs, treatments or therapies that do not involve the use of medications) in place to address residents' behavior, and 2. monitoring of behaviors, response to the anti-anxiety (AA, psychotropic medication used to reduce symptoms of anxiety- fear, worry) medication, including side effect (SE, reaction to a medicine) or adverse drug reaction (ADR, dangerous harmful reaction to drugs) in place These failures put the Resident 1 at risk of side effects and adverse drug reactions related to psychotropic medication use. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated Resident 1 admitted to the facility in November of 2024 with diagnoses of dementia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 54 did not receive scheduled medications in a timely manner. 2. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 was observed laying in Resident 37's bed using her personal cellphone. These failures increased the resident's potential to have unmet health needs and decreased the facility's potential to provide responsible and accurate care for residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/25 at 11:44 a.m. with Resident 54 in her room, Registered nurse (RN) 1 brought Resident 54 a medicine cup with 10 pills in it. RN 1 informed Resident 54 the medications in the cup were ibuprofen (medication used to treat pain), docusate (medication used to treat constipation), multivitamin and ascorbic acid (vitamin c supplement). Resident 54 stated her medications were always late and they should have been given with breakfast around 8 a.m. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/20/25 at 3:21 p.m. with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin (medication used to reduce blood sugar) was not administered when blood sugar was below 120 (target range for blood sugar when insulin is not required) for one of 26 sampled Residents (Resident 7) for 10 out of 19 days in March 2025. This failure had the potential to result in low blood sugar symptoms for Resident 7. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's Face Sheet (demographics), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 7 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type 2 (disease that causes high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure, Cognitive Communication Deficit (medical condition involving thinking process and attention), need for assistance with personal care. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/19/25 at 7:51 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Resident 7's room, LVN 1 administered Insulin Glargine 15 units via prefilled syringe to Resident 7. LVN 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications, supplements, and supplies were appropriately labeled and stored in accordance with accepted standards of practice when: 1. A prescription nystatin powder (a medication to treat yeast or fungal infection of the skin) was found at Resident 9's bedside table. 2. Two medication bubble packs were left unattended on top of a medication cart. 3. Two used topical medications had no caps to cover the tubes in the treatment cart. 4. A collagen matrix dressing (a type of wound dressing that promotes wound healing) package and a Xeroform (a type of wound dressing that promotes wound healing) package dressing were found open in the treatment cart. 5. Five expired syringes with needles were found in the emergency cart. 6. The refrigerator storage for medications was not maintained at a safe temperature. 7. Expired medications were observed in one of two medication carts, cart one. 8. Unsecured medication was observed at the bedside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in safe and sanitary conditions in the food service department when: 1. The kitchen refrigerator and the Dry Food Storage Area contained food that was not labeled and not covered. 2. The emergency food storage area contained food that was not labeled and expired. These failures had the potential to expose residents to food contamination and food-borne illnesses (sickness by consuming contaminated food or drinks). Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/17/25 at 8:30 a.m., in the kitchen refrigerator, there were seven cucumbers, inside an open box uncovered with no date. During an interview on 3/17/25 at 8:36 a.m. with DM in the kitchen, DM stated the expectation was for staff to label and date all food to prevent cross-contamination and food-borne illnesses. DM further stated the expiration date was important to ensure the residents consumed a safe food product. During an observation on 3/17/25 at 8:46 a.m., in the Dry Food Storage Area, there were individual-packed Italian…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 13) was within her reach. This failure had the potential for Resident 13's needs not being met. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, dated 3/18/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/25 at 10:53 a.m., in Resident 13's room, Resident 13 was lying in bed. Resident 13's call light was tied on the left bed rail and was hanging off the bed. Resident 13 stated she could not reach the call light where it was located. Resident 13 stated she uses her call light to call for assistance. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/25 at 10:55 a.m., in Resident 13's room with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON confirmed the location…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 1) was notified of a room/roommate change with a written notice that included the reason before the facility had changed the resident's room. This failure had the potential to result in negatively impacting Resident 1's emotional and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During an interview on 3/17/25 at 9:05 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she woke up to multiple male staff standing over her bed and was told to get up because she was moving to a different room. Resident 1 stated she was not notified of the room change prior to moving and did not want to change rooms. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/19/25 at 4:51 p.m. with the Administrator (Admin), Resident 1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was reviewed. The EHR did not show a bed change notification. The Admin confirmed Resident 1's room was changed in June 2023. The Admin stated, this is a problem and Resident 1 should have been notified. During a review of Resident 1's Progress Note, dated 6/15/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the shower's water temperature was comfortable for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving a comfortable shower. Findings: During an interview on 3/17/25 at 9:05 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the shower's water never stayed warm. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/19/25 at 7:55 a.m. with the Maintenance Director (Main) in the Spa Shower Room, the Main checked the shower's hot water temperature, and it read 90 degrees Fahrenheit after 3 minutes. The Main stated the temperature should have been 110 degrees Fahrenheit. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Water Temperatures, dated 1/2/12, the P&P indicated, The Facility ensures water is maintained at temperatures suitable to meet residents' needs.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of notice of transfer/discharge was sent to the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes) for two of 26 sampled residents (Residents 58 and 59) when: 1. Resident 58 was transferred to the hospital on 2/26/25. 2. Resident 59 was discharged home on [DATE]. These failures had the potential for residents to be inappropriately transferred or discharged which could result in violating their rights. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 58's admission Record, dated 3/19/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute (short duration and requires immediate attention) pyelonephritis (kidney infection). During a review of Resident 58's Nursing Progress Note, dated 2/26/25, the Nursing Progress Note indicated Resident 58's had a fever of 100.6 Fahrenheit and a nurse practitioner ordered to send Resident 58 to the emergency room for further evaluation for possible sepsis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and submit accurate data for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 37) when: 1. the Level I PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review- used to receive needed mental health services) screening was not reassessed upon admission to the facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 37 to not receive specialized mental health services to meet their needs. 2. the Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used to guide resident care) did not reflect Resident 37's current status. This failure resulted in the transmission of inaccurate data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, dated 3/20/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-mental health condition caused by experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) anxiety disorder (mental health condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for two of 26 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 9) when: 1. There was no fall care plan for Resident 1. This failure had the potential to cause multiple falls due to lack of interventions and proper monitoring. 2. There was no physical therapy (PT, the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical methods such as massage, heat treatment, and exercise) care plan for Resident 9. This failure had the potential for Resident 9 to not receive the specific services necessary to meet her needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 3/20/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (a decline in mental abilities, such as memory, thinking and reasoning), abnormalities of gait and mobility (abnormal movements and walking pattern), and difficulty in walking. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/19/25 at 7:55 a.m. with Resident 1 in her room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 50) with feeding in a timely manner. This failure had the potential for Resident 50 to lose weight. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record, dated 3/19/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of spinal stenosis (a condition where the spinal canal, the bony tunnel that protects the spinal cord and nerve roots, becomes narrowed), failure to thrive (FTT- lack of appropriate weight gain or a decline, which can lead to further health problems) and need for assistance with personal care. During an observation on 3/17/25 from 12:37 to 1:14 p.m. in Resident 50's room, Resident 50 was lying in the bed with lunch tray on his bedside table. Resident 50 was nonverbal and staring at his lunch tray, but was unable to move his arms/hands to feed himself. During an interview on 3/17/25 at 1:14 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 9) when physician's orders for physical therapy treatment (PT, the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical methods such as massage, heat treatment, and exercise) were not provided. This failure resulted in Resident 9 feeling frustrated on her functional and physical progress. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, dated 3/18/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of obesity and difficulty in walking. During an interview on 3/17/25 at 11:22 a.m., with Resident 9, Resident 9 stated she was in the facility mainly to receive rehabilitation services because she shattered her kneecap and broke her left femur last year. Resident 9 stated she had not been receiving physical therapy for some time now which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label an enteral feeding (a method to provide food through a tube placed in the nose, the stomach, or the small intestine) bottle, an enteral feeding pump bag (a feeding bag consists of a feeding bag and tubing), and a syringe used for enteral feeding for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 22). This failure had the potential for enteral feeding supplement and equipment to be misused by staff causing cross contamination for Resident 22. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, dated 3/18/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach) malfunction. During an observation on 3/17/25 at 9:50 a.m., in Resident 22's room, a Glucerna 1.5 (an enteral feeding formula) was observed infusing at 60 ml/hr (milliliter per hour, a unit of measurement). Upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) appropriately primed (removing air bubbles from the needle to ensures that the needle is open and working) a Lantus insulin (a long acting medication used to control high blood sugar) pen (a device resembling a pen that delivers insulin injection) before administering to one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 7). This failure had the potential to compromise the medication dose given to Resident 7. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, dated 3/18/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2 (high blood sugar). During a concurrent medication administration observation and interview on 3/19/25 at 8:05 a.m., of Resident 7's morning medications, with LVN 1, LVN 1 removed the cap of the Lantus insulin pen, turned the dial, and pressed the injection button. LVN 1 then attached and screwed the needle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent when three identified medication errors out of 36 opportunities were observed: 1. Losartan Potassium (medication to manage high blood pressure) was administered without obtaining a blood pressure prior to administration for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 7). 2. Insulin Glargine [Lantus] (medication to manage high blood sugar) was administered outside of dosing parameter instructions for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 7). 3. Metoprolol Succinate ER(medication to manage high blood pressure) was not administered per the physician's order for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 7). These failures resulted in an overall facility medication error rate of 8.33% and had the potential to result in adverse health outcomes for Resident 7 and Resident 12. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 7's Face Sheet (demographics), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 7 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide physical therapy treatment (PT, the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical methods such as massage, heat treatment, and exercise) as ordered by a physician for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 9). This failure had the potential for Resident 9 to not attain her highest possible level of physical and functional well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, dated 3/18/25 admission Record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of obesity and difficulty in walking. During an interview on 3/17/25 at 11:22 a.m., with Resident 9, Resident 9 stated she was in the facility mainly to receive rehabilitation services because she shattered her kneecap and broke her left femur last year. Resident 9 stated she had not been receiving physical therapy for some time now which concerned her because she had been in the facility for months. During a review of Resident 9's Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and implement infection control practices for three of 26 sampled residents (Residents 7, 55, and 1) when: 1. Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) 1 was not wearing a gown while proving care to Resident 7 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, are infection control intervention designed to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organism, MDROs - a germ that is resistant to many antibiotics) 2. Restorative Nursing Assistant/ Certified Nursing Assistant (RNA) 1 was not wearing a gown while repositioning and changing blanket of Resident 55 who was on EBP. 3. Resident 1 was not placed on EBP. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of infectious diseases among residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, dated 3/18/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic ulcer (open sore or wound) of the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment when one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 3) was observed with black insects crawling in her bed. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 being exposed to insect bites and potentially triggering an allergic reaction. Finding: During a review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (demographics) dated 3/20/25, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit (communication difficulties arising from impairments in thinking process, memory, attention span, executive functions), need for assistance with personal care, and generalized muscle weakness. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/20/25 at 12:30 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 in Resident 3's room, Resident 3 was observed lying in bed. CNA 2 pulled back Resident 3's blankets and tiny black insects scattered around the bed linens and on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice to a resident's Responsible Party (RP) for one resident (Resident 2) of three sampled residents when Resident 2 was moved to a different room without prior notification of the reason why, when the change would occur, and the opportunity to participate in the decision. This failure decreased the facility's potential to respect the resident or the RP's right to participate in the decision to move to a different room which had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated admission to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses which included autistic disorder (a developmental disability caused by differences in the brain characterized by problems with social communication and interaction), anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that can significantly interfere with daily life), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (a rare type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for one resident (Resident 1) when the facility did not initiate a care plan for Resident 1's wandering and high risk of elopement behavior. This failure contributed to a breakdown in the facility's system to provide the person-centered supervision required for Resident 1 when she eloped from the facility unsupervised in her wheelchair. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis was Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 1/23/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a screening tool used to assess a person's orientation and short-term memory) score was 3 which meant a severe impairment in cognition (the mental process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when Resident 1 eloped from the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility without staff knowledge and decreased the facility's potential to prevent accident and injury to Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility in January 2024 with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 1/23/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a screening tool used to assess a person's orientation and short-term memory) score was 3 which meant a severe impairment in cognition (the mental process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and senses). The MDS also indicated Resident 1 used a manual wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to manage the dialysis (use of a machine to clean the blood when the kidneys are no longer able to do this) care of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when facility staff did not obtain a physician's order for Resident 1's dialysis, did not include his dialysis schedule in his care plan, did not transport Resident 1 to his scheduled dialysis appointments or transported Resident 1 late to his appointments, did not document Resident 1's missed appointments, did not notify Resident 1's physician about his missed appointments, and did not document the reason the appointments were missed. These failures had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for Resident 1 when his caregivers may not have readily available all the information they need regarding his dialysis care and potentially left his doctor unaware of how many dialysis appointments he is missing. Finding: During an interview on 7/1/24 at 1:03 p.m., an anonymous complainant stated the facility had been having issues with transporting Resident 1 to his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a system for validating the competencies of registry nurses. This failure had the potential to result in residents being cared for by nurses who may not have all the skills needed to provide safe care. Finding: During an interview on 5/7/24 at 12 p.m., the personnel file of a registry nurse who was involved in a facility reported incident was requested for review. Director of Nursing (DON) stated the nurse's personnel records were on file with the staffing agency and copies would need to be requested from the agency. DON took down a list of records this surveyor wanted to see, which included the nurse's competency evaluation. Review of an email correspondence on 5/9/24 at 10:43 a.m. revealed Administrator indicated he had requested the nurse's competency evaluation from the staffing agency with a request that it be sent urgently. On 5/10/24 at 8:56 a.m. and 4 p.m., phone calls were made to DON and Administrator requesting a status update on the nurse's competency evaluation with no reply. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1's) right to be free from financial abuse when the Social Services Director (SSW) used Resident 1's ATM (Automated Teller Machine) card for her personal use without authorization. This finding caused Resident 1 anxiety and sadness, and had the potential to result in severe psychological and emotional distress in addition to financial exploitation. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure (A long-term condition in which the heart cannot pump blood well enough to meet the body's needs), Major Depressive Disorder (A mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and Anxiety Disorder (A mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and concurrent interview with the Administrator on 8/2/23, the facility failed to provide bedrooms measuring at least 80 square feet per resident in 4 of 27 resident rooms (rooms 6, 8, 9,& 17). This failure resulted not having the minimum required space in rooms 6, 8, 9, and 17. Findings: During a tour of the facility with the Administrator on 8/2/23 at 10:00 a.m. the Administrator showed and stated rooms 6, 8, 9, and 17 did not provide at least 80 square feet of space per resident. The Administrator provided a copy of the Client Accommodations Analysis (CDPH 709) dated 4/27/23, which indicated rooms 6, 8, 9, and 17 provided 77.7, 72.6, 77.7, and 66.4 square feet of space per resident respectively. No adverse effects to resident health and safety was reported. The Administrator stated the facility was requesting a renewal of the room size waiver for rooms 6, 8, 9, and 17. The Department recommends the facility be granted a room size waiver for rooms 6, 8, 9, and 17.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices requirement were met in the kitchen when: 1. The Ansul System (an automatic fire suppression system) pipeline was observed to have brown and black debris. 2. Two kitchen cabinets that stored kitchen equipment had peeling paint and wood and had yellow and brown stains. 3. Four clear rectangular plastic containers were stored right side up. 4. Four one-gallon clear plastic containers were stored stacked up with visible water in them. 5. The foil and saran wrap holders had the cutters with brown rust. 6. The window air conditioner vents had visible gray debris. 7. A dietary staff did not change gloves and perform hand hygiene in between cleaning kitchen equipment and preparing food. 8. A dietary staff did not wear gloves while preparing food. These failures had the potential to expose 47 residents who consume food prepared in the kitchen to foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/22/23, at 8:41 a.m., in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/22/23, at 8:50 a.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), Resident 28's oxygen cannula and tubing (a system to deliver oxygen from a tank to the Resident's nose) was observed with no date or time labeled on the tubing. The IP stated, the tubing should be labeled with date and time at least every seven days. Review of facility's policy and procedure titled, Oxygen Therapy, Nursing Manual - General, dated November 2017, indicated, Policy: Oxygen is administered under safe and sanitary conditions to meet resident needs . II. Oxygen - Storage, Maintenance, and Handling . C. Oxygen tubing, mask, and cannulas will be changed no more than every seven (7) days and as needed. The supplies will be dated each time they are changed. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. A staff performed hand hygiene while delivering meal trays to one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 11) and one of two unsampled residents (Resident 33).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not record accurate diagnoses on the Minimum Data Set Reports (MDS- an assessment tool) and the admission Record (a document containing resident profile information) for Residents 29, 39, 43, 47, 152 and 153. This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate care plans and inappropriate medical care for these residents. Findings: Resident 29: During a review of Resident 29's admission Record, dated 1/12/23, the admission Record indicated, Resident 29's admission date was 1/12/23. Diagnosis information on the admission Record listed the onset date of Paraplegia (loss of muscle function in the lower part of the body) as 1/12/23. However, during a review of Resident 29's Discharge Summary, dated 1/12/23, the Discharge Summary indicated, Resident 29's Paraplegia was a diagnosis of past medical history from 1970. Resident 39: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, dated 5/22/23, the admission Record indicated, Resident 39 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and obtain informed consents (a consent that provides the risks and benefits of taking a medication, possible side effects, alternate treatments, and risk of no use) for three psychoactive medications (chemical substances that affect mental processes such as perception, mood, cognition, and behavior) for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 14). This failure had the potential for Resident 14's representative to not be fully informed and consented for Resident 14 to receive psychoactive medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance), dated 5/24/23, the record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a progressive disorder of the nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), dementia (a progressive decline in memory that affects the ability to perform everyday activities),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light and the phone were within reach for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 37). This failure had the potential for Resident 37 to be unable to contact staff when in need of assistance. Findings: During a review of Resident 37's Physician Note, dated 11/4/22, the note indicated, Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of moderate dementia (a progressive decline in memory that affects the ability to perform everyday activities). During a review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) section G (functional status), dated 3/8/23, section G indicated, Resident 37's bed mobility required limited assistance from staff. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/22/23, at 9:58 a.m., with Resident 37, Resident 37 was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. Resident 37's call light was on top of the bedside drawer, not within Resident 37's reach. Resident 37…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 37) had a Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form that communicates a person's wishes of medical orders during an emergency) that was signed by the resident's durable power of attorney (DPOA - a person who makes medical decisions anytime a resident is incapable to do it on her/his own). This failure had the potential for Resident 37 to receive inaccurate treatment during an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 37's Physician Note, dated 11/4/22, the note indicated, Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diganosis of moderate dementia (a progressive decline in memory that affects the ability to perform everyday activities). During a review of Resident 37's Order Summary Report, dated 5/23/23, the report indicated, Resident is incapable of making health decisions. If incapable, state reason:_Dementia_Healthcare decision maker assigned: (name of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for a floor pad next to the bed was implemented for one Resident, with a history of falls (Resident 20), of 21 sampled residents. This failure had the potential for Resident 20 to sustain injuries in a fall from the bed to the unpadded floor. Findings: A review of Resident 20's Order Summary Report, date 5/25/23, indicated, Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia and a history of falling. The report included a physician's order dated 4/2/19, for floor pad to the right side of bed for prevention of injury during fall, every shift. During an observation on 5/24/23, at 10: 31 a.m., Resident 20 was observed in her room, lying in bed. There was no pad on the floor next to the bed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/24/23, at 10:44 a.m., with the Director of Nursing(DON), Resident 20 was observed lying in bed. There was no pad on the floor next to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 21 sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 37) were provided juice supplement per physician's orders. This failure had the potential for Resident 5 and Resident 37 nutritional needs not being met. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's Physician Note, dated 10/13/22, the note indicated, Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should). During a concurrent meal observation, interview, and record review on 5/22/23, at 12:48 p.m., with Resident 5, Resident 5 was in bed eating her lunch meal. A review of Resident 5's lunch ticket indicated, Beverages: 8 oz (ounce) Water, 6 oz Juice Supplement (a high calorie, high protein nutritional juice drink that is an alternative to dairy based shakes). Resident 5 had a glass of water, but no juice supplement. Resident 5 stated, she did not get her juice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The Residents' Refrigerator was free of ice buildup. 2. The Residents' food that was brought into the facility was labeled and had received dates. This failure had the potential for the quality of the Residents' food to be diminished and the food to be consumed beyond the expired date. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/23/23, at 9:28 a.m., with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the Residents' Refrigerator was observed to have ice buildup on the walls of the freezer and on the back of the refrigerator. The CDM stated, there should not have been ice buildup in the freezer and refrigerator. During an interview on 5/24/23, at 1:47 p.m., with the Director of Housekeeping (DH), the DH stated, his staff cleaned the Resident's Refrigerator every Friday. The DH stated, there was no cleaning log for the Resident's Refrigerator. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/23/23, at 9:28 a.m., with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the following items were found in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the garbage was disposed of properly when one of the garbage dumpster lids was not closed, and the surrounding area had trash on the ground. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/23/23, at 9:21 a.m., at the outside corner of the facility, with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), one of the garbage dumpster lids was opened and the surrounding area had trash on the ground. The CDM stated, the garbage dumpster lids should have been closed and the surrounding area did not look good. The CDM stated, maintenance and housekeeping oversaw the garbage dumpster and the area surrounding the garbage dumpster. During an interview on 5/23/23, at 9:41 a.m., with the Director of Housekeeping (DH), the DH stated the garbage dumpster lid had to be closed at all times and the area around it should be clean. According to the United States Food and Drug Administration (USDA) Food Code 2022, Section 5-501.110 Storage Refuse, Recyclables, and Returnable,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Administration Records (MAR) for two sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 37) accurately reflect that a 6 oz (ounce) of juice supplement was documented as not given during a meal. This failure resulted in an inaccuracy of nutritional supplement intakes for Resident 5 and 37. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's Physician Note, dated 10/13/22, the note indicated, Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should). During a concurrent meal observation, interview, and record review on 5/22/23, at 12:48 p.m., with Resident 5, Resident 5 was in bed eating her lunch meal. A review of Resident 5's lunch ticket indicated, Beverages: 8 oz Water, 6 oz Juice Supplement (a high calorie, high protein nutritional juice drink that is an alternative to dairy based shakes). Resident 5 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one resident, with an intellectual disability (Resident 101), out of 21 sampled residents, when potentially hazardous items were kept at Resident 101's bedside. This failure had the potential for Resident 101 to injure himself with unsupervised use of the items. Findings: A review of Resident 101's admission Record (demographic information), dated 5/5/23, indicated, he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included Down Syndrome (a condition which includes intellectual disability) and Alzheimer's Dementia (a progressive decline in memory that affects the ability to perform everyday activities ). During an observation on 5/22/23, at 11:29 a.m., in Resident 101's room, a blue plastic, gallon-sized basket was observed on the floor next to the bed. The basket held a container of medicated gauze packing strips (used for wound care), a container of medicated skin cleanser, a pill cutter with a metal blade, and a disposable razor. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-17 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide oversight and supervision, by a Registered Dietician, to kitchen staff (Cook C). This failure resulted in the Registered Dietician not carrying out competency and skills assessments for [NAME] C, thereby compromising the functions of the food and nutrition services. Finding: During an interview on 1/13/20 at 4:30 p.m., in the kitchen, [NAME] C stated he had worked at the facility for 8 months. When asked to explain his process for Potentially Hazardous Food Cool Down (PHF), [NAME] C stated, I am not familiar with Hazardous Food cool down procedures. When asked where the cool down logs were kept, [NAME] C stated, we don't have any. During an interview on 1/14/20 at 10:00 a.m., in the kitchen, Certified Dietary Supervisor (CDS) stated, I am new here and have only been here for one week. CDS stated, she was familiar with PHF Cool down procedures and would try to find out where the logs were kept. During a concurrent interview and document review on 1/14/20 at 2:10 p.m., CDS stated, I did find our Cool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of documents, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, served or distributed in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when: 1) Mixer was not cleaned and sanitized, and, 2) Potentially Hazardous Food (food that supports the rapid and accelerating growth of infectious or toxic microorganisms) Cool Down Log procedures were not followed. These failures to ensure effective food and nutrition service operations may result in placing residents at risk for food borne illness and the growth of microorganism as well as chemical contamination of ingested items. Findings: 1) During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/13/20 at 4:15 p.m., in the kitchen with [NAME] C, he was asked what the material was on both the mixer and the shaft of the mixer. [NAME] C stated, it was old white cake batter. [NAME] C stated, the white old material was moldy and could cause a food borne illness if the residents ingested it. When asked what the facility's kitchen cleaning procedure was for the mixer, [NAME] C stated, I am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility did not maintain infection control practices when one resident ( Resident 23) was not offered hand hygiene prior to his meal and when one licensed nurse did not sanitize the glucometer between residents. Not offering hand hygiene prior to a meal and not sanitizing the glucometer between residents had the potential to contribute to transmission based infections. Findings: During an observation with concurrent interview on 1/15/2020 at 4:30 p.m., Licensed Nurse A used the facility glucometer to test the blood sugar level of Resident 23. When finished with the test, Licensed Nurse A placed the glucometer on Resident 23's bedside table. When finished checking Resident 23's blood sugar, Licensed Nurse A placed the glucometer directly into the drawer of the medication cart. Licensed Nurse A proceeded to Resident 21's room with the medication cart, took the glucometer out of the drawer, and started walking into Resident 21's room. When asked by this writer if she was going to sanitize the glucometer, Licensed Nurse A stopped,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident 38) received oxygen therapy per physician's order and facility policy. This failure had the potential to contribute to Resident 38's discomfort and decreased ability to breathe. Findings: During an observation on 1/13/20 at 10 a.m., in Resident 38's room, the oxygen was observed to be infusing at 3.5 liters. Resident 38 stated, the air in my nose seems to be blowing more than usual. Resident 38's oxygen gauge was set to deliver 3.5 liters of oxygen. Also, the facility nursing staff had not dated Resident 38's oxygen tubing. During an interview in Resident 38's room on 1/13/20 at 10:05 a.m., Licensed Nurse B stated, the oxygen gauge was just above 3 liters. Licensed Nurse B left the room to check the physician's order. Upon returning, Licensed Nurse B stated, the physician's order indicated not to exceed 2 liters of oxygen because of Resident 38's diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a lung disease characterized by chronic obstruction of lung airflow that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-03-20
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-13 for 6 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2024 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/27/2025 |
| DHUGGA, GURPREET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2019 |
| WHITE, CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/16/2023 |
| SAN RAFAEL WELLNESS GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2012 |
| MAJER, SOL | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 01/01/2019 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2012 |
| ERETZ SAN RAFAEL PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/15/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $688K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055331. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.