Monterey Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP
1267 San Gabriel Blvd, Rosemead, CA 91770 · For profit - Individual · 96 certified beds · (626) 280-3220 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Nov 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,021 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-20)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 34.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.3% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.66 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.81 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
21.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 91.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 42% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 21.8%CMS range 14.9–29.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.4–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 91.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 79.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 84.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.6–9.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.47 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 68.5 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent two of two residents (Residents 1 and 2) who were assessed at high risk for elopement (an act of leaving a care facility or safe area independently without notifying anyone) from leaving the facility in accordance with the facility's policy for elopement and residents' plan of care by failing to: 1. Provide adequate monitoring and supervision to ensure Resident I, who had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions, and was assessed at risk for elopement with diagnoses of suicidal ideation (thinking about killing yourself) did not elope from the facility on 9/10/2024 during a change of shift [evening shift and night shift) at 11 PM from Patio I. 2. Provide adequate monitoring and supervision to ensure Resident 2, who had no capacity to understand and make decisions, assessed at risk for elopement and with diagnoses of suicidal ideations, did not elope from the facility, on 9/17/2024, during change of shift [night shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) on abuse for one of two sampled residents (Resident 4) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 failed to report an alleged resident-to-resident altercation between Residents 4 and 5 on 4/28/26. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 4 at risk for unrecognized abuse, delayed assessment of injuries, and failure to ensure resident safety, protection, and timely reporting in accordance with the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), anxiety, and depression. During a review of Resident 4's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/25/26, the H&P indicated Resident 4 could make his needs known but could not make medical decisions. During an interview with Resident 4 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary medical social services to one of two sampled residents (Resident 3) when the Social Service Coordinator (SSC) did not follow up or encourage Resident 3 to participate in dental care services, and did not explain the potential risk and benefits of declining dental treatments as indicated in the Resident's care plan after Resident 3 reportedly refused dental treatments on 4/1/26. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet dental needs, delayed identification and treatment of oral health issues, and a possible decline in Resident 3's overall health and quality of life due to lack of appropriate follow-up and support from facility staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), anxiety, and bipolar disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control for 66 of 66 sample residents per the facility's Water Management Plan for the Prevention of Waterborne Pathogens (bacteria, viruses, or parasites found in contaminated water) by failing to ensure: 1. The Water Heater 1's mercury temperature gauge (a glass tube filled with mercury that can be used to measure changes in temperature) was not broken and functional. 2. The Water Heater 2's mercury temperature gauge reading was maintained at 110 degrees Fahrenheit ( F, a unit of temperature), not at 145 F. 3. The water temperature reading at Nursing Station A ranged from 86 F - 105 F, which was below the 110 degrees Fahrenheit as indicated on the facility's Water Management Program. 4.The water temperature at Nursing Station B ranged from 116 F - 120 F, which was above the 110 F as indicated on the facility's Water Management Program. 5. A monitoring log indicated the visual checks of the facility's water heaters to monitor and identify any changes in the water appearance to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive-person centered care plan for three of three sample residents (Resident 9, 35, and 5) by failing to ensure: 1. The care plan was not implemented for Resident 9 with a history of hemolytic anemia (a blood disorder where the red blood cells [RBC] are destroyed faster than the bone marrow can replace them, leading to fatigue, jaundice [yellowing of skin], and dark urine) to monitor the resident for signs and symptoms of anemia (a blood condition where there is not enough healthy RBC or hemoglobin [HGB, protein that carries blood to the tissues; normal range 11 - 16 grams per deciliter (g/dL)]). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 9 not to receive the necessary care and interventions for her history of hemolytic anemia that could lead to a decline in the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being that may lead to foreseeable risks, including unrecognized progression of anemia, severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the facility's one of one kitchen used by 66 residents when the facility did not ensure the dishwasher machine thermometer was functioning properly. This deficient practice had the potential to spread foodborne illnesses throughout the facility through dishes that were not sanitized properly. Findings: During an interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 3/24/26 at 9:18 AM and concurrent observation of the facility's kitchen, the facility's dishwashing machine was observed. The DS stated the dishwashing machine was a low temperature dishwasher and the staff were required to check and log two temperatures when the dishwasher ran: the Wash Temperature and Rinse Temperature. The DS stated the wash temperature and rinse temperatures should both be at a minimum of 120 degrees Fahrenheit ( F) to properly clean the dishware. The dishwashing machine was run three times and had the following temperatures: Run 1:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided assistance with dining in a manner that promoted and maintained resident dignity for one of one sampled resident (Resident 69) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was observed feeding Resident 69 while standing, rather than sitting at eye level. This deficient practice did not promote a dignified, person-centered dining experience and had the potential to make Resident 69 feel rushed, disrespected, or less engaged during meals. Findings: During a review of Resident 69's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental illness that was characterized by disturbances in thought), anxiety disorder (feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness that may occur as a reaction to stress), and adult failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which could cause weight loss, decreased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 75) was provided with written information regarding Advance Directive (AD, a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) upon admission in accordance with federal requirements and facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 75 not to be informed about their rights to make an informed decision regarding their medical care.Findings: During a review of Resident 75's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental illness that was characterized by disturbances in thought), depression (constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stopped you doing your normal activities), and cannabis use (a plant used for psychoactive effects which altered mood, perception, and consciousness). During a review of Resident 75's History and Physical (H&P)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident exhibiting new behaviors of verbal threats for one of two sampled residents (Resident 35) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 observed Resident 35 regularly saying, I want to hit you to staff but did not notify Resident 35's physician of this new behavior. On 3/24/26, Resident 35 was witnessed throwing coffee toward Resident 58 during activities and Resident 35 was transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) for medical and psychiatric evaluation. This failure to report Resident 35's new behavior of verbal threats toward others did not allow Resident 35's physician to evaluate Resident 35 and apply new interventions such as making changes to Resident 35's medications or ordering new nursing interventions. This had the potential for Resident 35 to escalate his behavior and physically attack staff or other residents. [Cross reference F656] Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise or update the care plan for one of one sampled residents (Resident 72) to address new interventions related to paranoid schizophrenia (chronic mental disorder characterized by intense, irrational paranoia, delusions [false beliefs], and auditory hallucinations [hearing voices]) due to increased hallucinations when readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 72 not receiving appropriate interventions and treatment and/or services and negatively affect the resident's psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia (chronic mental disorder characterized by intense, irrational paranoia, delusions [false beliefs], and auditory hallucinations [hearing voices]), schizophrenia, and diabetes mellitus (chronic metabolic disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six residents (Resident 9 and Resident 16) was informed of the name and purpose of each medication at the time of administration. This deficient practice had the potential to limit Resident 9 and Resident 16's ability to make informed decisions and participate in their care. Findings: a.During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental illness that was characterized by disturbances in thought), depression (constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stopped you doing your normal activities), and anxiety disorder (feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness that may have occurred as a reaction to stress). During a review of Resident 9's History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/25/2026, the H&P indicated the resident did not have the capacity to understand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor one of three sample residents (Resident 9 ), diagnosed with hemolytic anemia (a blood disorder where the red blood cells [RBC] are destroyed faster than the bone marrow can replace them, leading to fatigue, jaundice [yellowing of skin], and dark urine) with symptoms of blood loss in accordance with the care plan and professional standards of practice by failing to: 1.Monitor and assess Resident 9 for any signs and symptoms of hemolytic anemia such as skin pallor, shortness of breath upon activity, sore tongue, chest pain, tinnitus (ringing in ears), palpitations, and changes in condition. 2.Follow up with Resident 9's Clinic 1 (Hematology Clinic) regarding the after visit care regarding the plan of care for resident's management of hemolytic anemia. These failures resulted in Resident 9 being transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on 2/18/2026 with low blood pressure (BP, measure of the force of blood against artery walls; normal: 120/80 millimeters of mercury [mmHg]) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide interventions to one of three sample residents (Resident 54) with increased verbal aggression towards other staffs or residents and increased episodes of delusion (misconceptions or beliefs that are firmly held, contrary to reality) to ensure safety to other residents by implementing interventions to prevent Resident 54 from aggression towards residents and staffs. As a result, Resident 54 hit Resident 25 on the right cheek without major injury. In addition, Resident 54 had the potential to emotionally and physically harm other residents and staff due to aggression and delusional thoughts.Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), the facility admitted Resident 25 on 6/30/2021 and readmitted Resident 25 on 2/13/2026 with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia (mental health disorder where a resident experiences intense, irrational suspicion, paranoia, and hallucinations [perceptual experiences in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs and biologicals stored in Medication Cart A, for one of six sample residents (Resident 46) was properly labelled and reflected the correct dose and frequency as indicated on the active order's summary list. Resident 46's prescribed medication-Clozaril (Clozapine, an antipsychotic medication) Oral Tablet 25 milligrams (mg, unit of weight) medication label on the unit dose packaging (bubble pack or blister pack, an organization way to store and dispense pill medication). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 46 receiving the wrong dose and wrong frequency of Clozaril which may result in a medication error and compromise the safety of the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (AR), the facility admitted Resident 46 on 5/16/2024 and readmitted Resident 46 pm 9/8/2026 with diagnoses that include bipolar disorder (manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), schizophrenia (a mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the administration of medication for one of one sampled resident (Resident 4.)This failure had the potential to cause severe hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), unconsciousness, and death to the resident.Findings: During a review of Resident 4's face sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 4 was readmitted on [DATE] (original admission date 6/2/2008), with a diagnosis including but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by illness), schizophrenia (a mental disorder), diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 4's order summary report (OSR), dated 3/25/2026, the order summary report indicated on 11/24/2025 to start administering pioglitazone (medication used to treat DM) 45 milligrams (mg - metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) give one tablet orally (by mouth) one time a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician (MD) of an accident involving a resident for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) after Resident 1 was observed by staff walking head first into a door that resulted in a cut near his right eye during the nightshift on 3/7/26 around 3 AM. The facility's staff did not notify Resident 1's physician (MD) of the injury during the morning shift, on 3/7/26 at 9 AM, six (6) hours after the accident, when Resident 1 was sent to a general acute care hospital (GACH) for medical evaluation and treatment. This failure to notify Resident 1's physician at the time of Resident 1's accident delayed the MD from placing orders to evaluate Resident 1 for severe injury that potentially required medical intervention and to monitor Resident 1 for any change in condition and had the potential for Resident 1 to decline from his head injury.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the licensed staff verified Resident 1 ' s admission orders from the facility, by reviewing Resident 1 ' s medical history and general acute care hospital (GACH 1) discharge orders upon readmission to the facility on 3/12/2025, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when it failed to: As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 1 had the potential to not receive the care and services, and correct medications needed for the resident ' s diagnosis while in the facility. Findings: During a review of facility ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted on [DATE] but readmitted back to the facility from GACH 1 on 3/12/2025, with diagnoses that included Schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person ability to think, feel and behave clearly), Bipolar disorder (A disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for one of one resident (Resident 11) reviewed for competent nursing staff to care for resident with a diagnosis of Post-Trauma Stress Syndrome (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) that was identified through the resident assessments. This failure resulted in Resident 11 not receiving the appropriate skills related to his trauma and PTSD as identified through his resident assessments. This failure resulted in the staff not receiving the appropriate competencies and skill set needed to care for residents with trauma or PTSD to ensure resident safety and to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 11 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 11 on 6/20/2023 and readmitted Resident 11 on 1/17/2025 with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (a mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information daily in a prominent location that was readily accessible to residents and visitors for viewing in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Nursing Department - Staffing, Scheduling & Postings. This deficient practice resulted in inaccessibility of the accurate daily number of clinical staff giving direct care to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview in the presence with the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) on 2/13/2025 at 9:50 AM, there was no visible daily nurse staffing information posted. The ADON stated, there should be Nurse Staffing Postings readily accessible and visible for the residents and visitors. The ADON stated, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) was responsible for posting the staff information daily at the beginning of the shift. During an interview on 2/13/2025 at 10 AM with the DSD, the DSD stated, she posted the nurse staffing information on the visiting window for only the visitors to view. The DSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility ' s proper sanitation and food handling practices by failing to ensure the Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) adhere to properly securing hair with the hairnet without any hair exposed when assisting tray line ( process of preparing meals for the residents from the food preparation area to the meal trays) for 69 out of 69 residents residing in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses (also called food poisoning caused by eating contaminated food (transfer of bacteria, viruses, toxins [poisons] from the environment to the food ingested). Findings: During a dining observation on 2/13/25 12:19 PM, the DA 1 had hair exposed outside and visible outside of the hairnet while assisting the cook with the preparation of the meal rays. In a concurrent interview DA 1 stated it was important to secure all hair within the hairnet to prevent contamination and the risks of infection or illness associated with exposed hair that could contaminate the food being prepared.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper infection control practices for 69 of 69 sampled resident by failing to ensure the facility's Water Management Program followed the approved national, state, and local measures to prevent and monitor the growth of Legionella (water-borne opportunistic bacteria) These failures had the potential to contribute to poor infection control, improper cleaning and disinfection of the resident's clothing and linens, growth of Legionella within the facility's water system which can lead to Legionnaires' disease (a serious pneumonia [lung infection] that can be fatal) which would affect all the residents and staff within the facility, and potential to cause a facility fire by not tracking when lint screens were cleaned out from the clothes dryer. Findings: During an interview on 2/13/2025 at 10AM with the IP, the IP stated the facility does not test for Legionella unless there were 10 or more cases of pneumonia in the facility because testing for Legionella was very costly. The IP stated, there were five…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for 69 or 69 residents, staff and the public by failing to: 1. Ensure the facility's washing machine Lint Cleaning Log for 2/12/2025 and 2/13/2025 were completely filled out to indicate the facility's lint screens (lint trap, a device that catches lint and debris from laundry) were cleaned from the clothes dryer. These failures had the potential to cause a facility fire by not tracking when lint screens were cleaned out from the clothes dryer. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/13/2025 at 8:50AM with Laundry Services (LS), the facility's Lint Cleaning Log for 2/10/2025 to 2/12/2025 was reviewed. The Lint Cleaning Log indicated on 2/12/2025 at 4:00PM there was no documented evidence the lint screens were cleaned for two of three dryer machines. The LS stated, on 2/13/2025 at 8:30AM, there was no documented evidence the lint screens were cleaned for three of three dryer machines. The LS stated the lint screens were cleaned every 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote respect and dignity to one of one resident reviewed for dignity (Resident 19) who was observed with jeans tied with elastic gloves on the belt loop and was falling off, exposing his buttocks and groin area. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the resident's self image, sense of self-worth/ self-esteem and negatively affect the psychosocial being of the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 19 on 6/2/2008 and readmitted her on 5/24/2022 with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions) and hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are abnormally high levels of fats in the blood). During a review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 1/31/2025, indicated Resident 19 had intact cognition (ability to think and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be fully informed by the physician or other professional in a language that he can understand for one of three residents reviewed for resident's rights (Resident 56) who signed a consent to receive psychotropic medications ( medications that affects mood and behavior) when: 1.The Health & Physical (H&P) assessment by physician indicated Resident 56 does not have the mental capacity to make medical decisions. 2. Psychiatric notes indicated Resident 56 had cognitive impairments such as loose associations (a thought disorder characterized by a lack of logical connection between ideas or thoughts) and distractibility (the tendency to be easily distracted by external or internal stimuli). The facility allowed the Resident 56 to making medical decision and signed informed consent without a surrogate decision-maker (a person that advocate for the resident) or an interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting was not conducted to assist the resident with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of one of three residents reviewed for resident's rights, (Resident 119) in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure by failing to ensure the call light (a device used by residents to signal his or her needs for assistance) was within reach of the resident in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] in the west wing. This deficient practice had the potential for residents who shared Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] in the west wing not able to call the facility staff to ask for help or assistance specially during emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 119 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 119 on 9/11/2024 and readmitted him on 2/5/2025 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought processes, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 119's MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents reviewed for right to privacy (Resident 41 and 119) were provided with privacy when using the common restroom and common shower room by failing to ensure: The window in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] in the [NAME] Wing had stained-glass window film peeling off which let other people in the patio look thorough the window and see the residents when in the shower room. The window in Restroom [ROOM NUMBER] in the East Wing ' s had stained-glass window film that were peeling off which let other residents, staffs and visitors from the patio see the residents when using the restroom. This failure violated the resident ' s rights for privacy and the potential to result in Resident 41 not wanting to shower because she was feeling unsafe and exposed when showering, and Resident 119 feeling uncomfortable using the restroom. This practice also had the potential for other residents ' privacy to be violated. Findings: 1. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident specific care plan for two of twelve residents reviewed (Resident 68 and 11) by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 68's care plan was developed to address discharge planning before discharged from the facility on 12/2/2024. These deficient practices had the potential to result in confusion of Resident 68 ' s care and discharge process and negatively affect the resident's psychosocial wellbeing. 2. Resident 11's care plan was developed to address management and triggers for the Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event). As a result of this deficient practice the resident did not received interventions to prevent and aggressive behaviors towards staffs and residents that could result in futher decline in psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 68's Record of admission indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 68 on 10/10/2024 with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of four residents that was reviewed for trauma informed care, (Resident 11) who was diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) with culturally competent (cultural competence involves valuing diversity, conducting self-assessments, avoiding stereotypes, managing the dynamics of difference, acquiring and institutionalizing cultural knowledge, and adapting to diversity and cultural contexts in communities), trauma-informed care (an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing and responding to the effects of all types of trauma) according to professional standards of practice and accounting for the resident ' s experience and preferences to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause the resident ' s re-traumatization. This failure resulted in Resident 11 experiencing re-traumatization and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 11) to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being which encompassed the resident's whole emotional and mental well-being. This failure resulted in Resident 11's, who was diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD, a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event), continued behavior of agitation, yelling, and attempts to hit staff members. Cross reference with F699 and F726 Findings: During a review of Resident 11 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 11 on 6/20/2023 and readmitted Resident 11 on 1/17/2025 with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), schizophrenia (a mental illness that was characterized by disturbances in thought), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 28) does not receive Bactrim (Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim an antibiotics or medication used to treat infection) unnecessarily by indicating in the physician's order how long the medication should be administered. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 28 to develop antibiotic resistance (medication not effective to treat infection) and results in adverse reaction (undesirable effect) health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 28 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the facility admitted Resident 28 on 5/30/2024 with diagnoses that included heart failure (failure of the heart to meet the body ' s demand), asthma (a chronic lung condition that causes inflammation and narrowing of the airways, making it difficult to breathe), schizophrenia (is a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on resident safety by failing to provide supervision to one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who were at high risk for falls. This deficient practice resulted to Resident 1 having an acute subdural hematoma (a blood clot that forms between the brain's surface and its tough outer covering) after he had a fall when he attempted to stand up from a sitting position at the facility's patio without staff supervision. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s investigation summary report, dated 1/7/2025, indicated that on the evening of 1/2/2025, a staff who was in the patio observed Resident 1 sitting on the patio ' s brick seating area. At around 9 PM, Resident 1 stood up using his front-wheeled walker and fell on his right side. The staff who immediately responded to the fall assessed Resident 1 and found a bump and a cut on the resident ' s right forehead. The facility called 911 (a universal emergency number)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of two sampled Residents (Resident 1) that included specific interventions to monitor resident's behaviors who goes out on pass and with had a history of drug abuse. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to not receive appropriate care, treatment, and/or services. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated a readmission to the facility on 5/16/2024 with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction), schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition that is marked by a mix of schizophrenia [mental health condition that affects how people think, feel, and behave] symptoms such as hallucinations [false perception of objects or event involving the senses], delusions [belief or altered reality], and mood disorder symptoms such a depression [mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities], mania…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and attempt to locate one of two sampled residents, (Resident 1) who was assessed at risk for elopement, had a history of suicidal ideations, and had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions, upon receiving information on 7/13/2024, that Resident 1 was not admitted to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH 2) on 7/11/2024. As a result, Resident 1 had not been located and currently still missing, after eloping from the ambulance transportation on the way to GACH 2 emergency room (ER). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 ' s physical injuries and change in condition that may lead to hospitalization or death. Findings: During a review of General Acute Care Hospital (GACH 1) records indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Psychosis (mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) and was discharged to Facility on 7/1/2024. During a review of GACH 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and supervise one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was identified and assessed at risk for elopement. As a result, Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 4/30/2024, and remained missing until 5/1/2024, when resident was found at a nearby school football field, next to the facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to sustain injuries from being outside the facility with no access to scheduled medications and shelter needed for his condition which could lead to serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment and/or death. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of unspecified psychosis (a person ' s thoughts are disrupted and have difficulty recognizing what is real and what is not real), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were handled, prepared, and stored in a manner that prevented foodborne illness (food poisoning) for 63 of 63 residents receiving food from the kitchen, by failing to ensure: a. Expired products were removed from kitchen pantry. b. Food items were dated, labeled, and sealed after opening in the food preparation area, walk in freezer and dry storage area. c. [NAME] 1 wore hair restraint to cover beard and mustache while in kitchen and food storage areas. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to food borne illness for 63 of 63 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: a. During concurrent observation and interview on 03/12/2024 at 08:43 AM with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), observed the following in the walk-in refrigerator: - Teriyaki marinade and sauce had labeled that indicated opened date 12/14/2024, use by date (the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment and implement the facility ' s policy and procedure for infection control by ensuring resident ' s clothing and two clean linen carts were stored in the clean designed areas. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of diseases and infection to the residents, the facility staffs, and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/12/24 at 1:28 p.m. with the Infection Control Nurse (IPN) in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] East Wing (EW), eleven (11) hangers with clothes were observed hanging on the shower curtain pole with the shower curtain covering the shower stall. The IPN stated, she did not know if the clothes were clean or dirty, or with whom the clothes belong to, why and how long the clothes were placed in the common shower room that all other residents have access to. The IPN stated, the clothes should not be hanging in the common shower room because of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep the copy of an Advance Directive (known as living will, personal directive, advance directive, medical directive or advance decision, is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity.) in the medical record for one of five sample residents (Resident 44). This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm and conflict in carrying out the resident 44's wishes for medical treatment and health care decisions leading to irreversible outcomes. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 44 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) and insomnia (sleep disorder). A review of the History and Physical Examination (H&P) dated 5/28/23, indicated Resident 44…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident sample (Resident 20) was provided with privacy when showering in the common shower rooms. 1. Shower 1 (East Wing [EW]) did not have a privacy curtain in the shower room. 2. Shower 2 EW and Shower 3 EW and Shower 1 [NAME] Wing (WW) had no curtain in the shower room to provide privacy to the residents when dressing after shower. 3. Shower 2 WW had a large window without cover that could see through the shower room and the dressing area. This failure resulted in Resident 20 ' s not feeling safe, feeling exposed when showering or dressing after shower, and resident ' s refusal for shower for fear of somebody looking at him while he was naked. This deficient practice also had the potential for other residents ' privacy to be violated. Findings: A review of Resident 20 ' s admission Record, dated 3/14/24, indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment by ensuring the two restrooms had no foul odor for one of three sampled residents (Resident 47) that uses both restrooms. This failure resulted in Resident 47's reported not feeling to be in a homelike environment and had to wear mask when going to the restrooms because he could not breath due to terrible smell of the restroom. Findings: A review of Resident 47's admission Record, dated 3/14/24, indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), anxiety disorder (a condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and osteoarthritis (inflammation or swelling of one or more joints). A review of Resident 47's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment and screening tool) dated 9/21/23, the MDS indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of Resident 22 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included DM2 and schizophrenia (a chronic and severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). A review of Resident 22 ' s history and physical, dated 2/23/2023, indicated the resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 22 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening tool), dated 3/1/2024, indicated the resident has intact cognition. Resident 22 ' s MDS also indicated the resident is independent in doing activities of daily living (ADL ' s), including eating, toileting, bathing, dressing, and walking. A review of Resident 22 ' s Order Summary Report, dated 3/13/2024, indicated Resident 22 is prescribed medications for DM2: 1. Glipizide (medication used to decrease blood sugar level) 10mg one tablet by mouth two times a day, ordered on 11/6/2023. 2. Metformin 1000mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to meet the professional standards of quality care for one of four sample residents (Resident 5) by failing to clarify with the physician and review the pharmaceutical recommendation whether to administer Ziprasidone (a medication that affects mood and behavior) with food. This deficient practice has the potential to decrease bioavailability (drug become completely available to the body to produce a therapeutic effect) of the Ziprasidone and result in Resident 5 increased mood and behavioral concerns. Findings: A review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia (a serious mental health condition that affects the way a person thinks and communicates with outside world). A review of the History and Physical Examination dated 3/11/24, indicated Resident 5 is able to make decisions for activities of daily living. A review of Resident 5 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 20), maintains the ability to perform ADL (Activities of Daily Living) by failing to assess the reason for the refusal to take a shower and/or provide alternative measures to receive ADL assistance for a total of 47 days from 1/21/24 to 2/23/24 and 2/29/24 to 3/14/24. This failure had a potential to result in Resident 20 ' s decline to perform ADL, risk for body odor that could negatively affect the resident's self-image, skin break down, skin infections (occurs when germs enter the body and multiply, causing illnesses) and rashes. Findings: A review of Resident 20 ' s admission Record, dated 3/14/24, indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), anxiety disorder (a condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted and updated on a daily basis. to ensure sufficient staffs were maintained at the facility to provide care. As a result, the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by the staff was not readily accessible to residents and visitors to ensure the residents receives the care they needed. Findings: During an observation, on 3/13/24 at 10:48 a.m., the staffing information posted in reception station, indicated the date of 3/12/24, and a resident census of 64. On 3/13/24 at 12:13 p.m., the staffing information posted in reception station, was not updated or changed. During an observation and interview on 3/13/24 at 12:13 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated that the facility staffing information posted in Reception Station was still not updated or changed. The DSD stated she was the one updating and posting the staffing information. The DSD stated she posted the updated staffing information every day by 9 a.m. The DSD stated the staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services indicated in the facility policy by failing to ensure the Change of Shift Narcotics (drug that relief pain, cause state of stupor or sleep, and physical dependence) Reconciliation Records verified by two of wo Licensed Nurses. This deficient practice could lead to inaccurate record of narcotic medication use, loss or misuse of narcotic medication. Findings: On 2/21/2024, the night shift (11 PM to 7 PM shift) licensed nurses did not, count and sign off the Controlled Drugs Count Record (CDCR) at the end of shift with up coming licensed nurse as required in the facility's policy. On 3/3/2024, the day shift (7AM to 3 PM shift) licensed nurses did not perform narcotic count and sign off the CDCR at the end of the shift with up coming licensed nurse as required in the policy. During a concurrent record review of the CDCR and an interview with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 on 3/13/24 at 1:05 p.m., the LVN 1 stated CDCR were missing signatures from licensed nurses on 2/21/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to label drugs and medical device used in the facility that were stored in one of the two med carts and one of two medication room storage, in accordance with currently accepted professional principles by failing to: 1. Label a multi-dose Valproic Acid (a medication used to treat seizure disorder [a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain]) bottle without an opened date, stored in Medication Carts (Med Cart 1). 2. Remove three expired foley catheter insertion trays (medical device that helps drain urine from the bladder) stored in Medication Storage Room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the loss of efficacy of the Valproic Acid and can increased risk of seizures and a potential to result in the use of ineffective medical device for the residents. Findings: 1. During an observation and Medi Cart inspection in the [NAME] Wing Station on [DATE], at 9:49 a.m., in the presence of Licensed Vocational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurately document in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) that insulin was given for one of five sampled residents (Resident 22) that indicated two doses of regular insulin (a medication prescribed to control blood sugar level) were not administered. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 22 not to receive care and intervention in management of DM2 and lead to complications related to DM2 such as having high or low blood sugar. Findings: A review of Resident 22 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included DM2 and schizophrenia (a chronic and severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). A review of Resident 22 ' s history and physical, dated 2/23/2023, indicated the resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 22 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive standardized assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Residents 10, 55, and 44) who had no mental capacity to understand the terms of the facility ' s binding arbitration agreement (an agreement that allows parties to resolve disputes and lawsuits privately rather than going to the court) does not sign the arbitration agreement. This failure had the potential for Resident 10, 55 and 44 to not understand their rights for a binding arbitration agreement. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 10 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 10 on 6/15/2023, with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally) and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities. The admission Record indicated Resident 10 was self-responsible. A review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a call light (device used to alert facility staff assistance as needed by residents) for one out of 11 sampled residents (Resident 10). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident facility ' s failure to provide resident 10 with a call light is a serious issue that has the potential to delay care, endanger their safety, and impact their overall well -being. Findings: A review of Resident 10's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/15/2023, with diagnoses including but not limited to schizophrenia (lifelong brain disorder that causes people to interpret reality abnormally), dementia (Impaired thinking, remembering, or reasoning), unsteadiness on feet, and localized edema (swelling caused by excess fluid in body tissues). A review of Resident 10's History and Physical dated 6/15/2023, indicated resident 10 lacks capacity to make medical decisions. History and Physical of Resident 10 indicated Resident 10 has poor coordination and abnormal gait (when a person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician for one out of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 refused to take Olanzapine and Divalproex, psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) on 2/19/2024. This deficient practice placed the resident and other residents at risk of harm when Resident 1 had a physical altercation with Resident 2 the following day. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included restlessness and agitation, bipolar disorder (a mental health illness that causes extreme mood swings), and schizophrenia (mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves). A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/31/2024, indicated Resident 1 does not have capacity to make medical decisions. A review of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property (the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money) by failing to provide the trust fund (a legal arrangement that allows an individual to place assets in a special account to benefit another person or entity) to the resident or resident representative upon discharge from the facility, in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure on Discharge and Transfer of Residents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 ' s missing $5,091.46 Trust Fund from the date the resident was discharged from the facility on 5/2/23 up until 5/11/23 which caused an increased in Resident 1 ' s sadness and anxiety. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 11/3/23, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect Resident 2 from physical abuse by one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a known history of physical aggression toward staff and other residents by failing to: 1. Supervise Resident 1 to prevent Resident 1 from hitting Resident 2 on 8/27/2023, during the 3 PM to 11 PM shift, after Resident 1 had change of condition manifested by increased verbal/physical aggression and striking out during the 7 AM to 3 PM shift. 2. Ensure that a care plan was initiated when Resident 1 had a change of condition manifested by increased in verbal and physical aggression on 8/27/2023. 3. Follow the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse Prevention, Screening, & Training Program, that indicated the facility identifies, corrects, and intervenes in situations in which abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property and/or mistreatment is more likely to occur. These failures resulted in Resident 1 striking out by hitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to identify Resident 1's risk of elopement (an incident in which a person with cognitive (thought process) loss wanders out of a safe area, such as a home or nursing facility) by locating the resident's whereabouts when the resident was not found in his room by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 on 8/12/23 during the night (11 PM to 7 AM) shift. CNA 1 did not look for Resident 1 and did not notify the charge nurse (Licensed Vocational Nurse 1) that Resident 1 was not in bed on 8/12/23, during the start of the night shift. In addition, the facility failed to conduct reevaluation of Resident 1's elopement risks, after Resident 1 verbalized frustrations with wanting to go home during psychological consultations on 6/27/23, 7/14/23, and 8/11/23 (one day before Resident 1 eloped from the facility on 8/12/23), in accordance with the facility's policy on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolatedEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's licensed nurses and certified nurse assistants had the competencies and skills sets to provide care and services needed in the facility to work effectively with residents who had mental health disorders and other behavioral health needs, in accordance with the Facility Assessment on the facility's general resident population and the facility's policy on Staff Competency Assessment. As a result, one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), who had behavioral health needs due to diagnosis of sever psychosis and auditory hallucinations eloped from the facility on 8/12/2023. The facility's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 failed to ensure monitoring and supervision was provided to Resident 1 by locating the resident's whereabouts when the resident was not found in his room on 8/12/23 during the night (11 PM to 7 AM) shift. CNA 1 did not look for Resident 1 and did not notify the charge nurse (Licensed Vocational Nurse 1) that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (4) out of twenty-two (22) resident's rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 5, 20, and 26) accommodated no more than four residents in each room. The 4 resident rooms consisted of 2 (two) - twelve (12) bed capacity rooms, 1 (one), seven (7) bed capacity room, and 1 (one), six (6) bed capacity rooms. This deficient practice had the potential adversely affect the delivery of care, quality of life, safety and violate the resident's rights for privacy. Findings: During the entrance conference interview, the Administrator (ADM) on 3/24/2026 at 9:21 AM, the ADM stated there were four rooms in the facility that occupied more than four residents in each room, but the facility had a waiver (a permit approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for rooms that did not meet the regulation requirement) in place and would like to request an additional waiver this year. The ADM stated the multiple beds per room had no impact on care of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft., unit of measurement) per resident for twelve (12) out of twenty-two (22) resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 21, 26, 27, 28, 30, and 31). The 12 resident rooms consisted of 1 (one), twelve (12) bed capacity room, 1 (one), seven (7) bed capacity room, 2 (two), four (4) bed capacity rooms, 2 (two), three (3) bed capacity rooms, and 6 (six), two (2) bed capacity rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the quality-of-care and the ability to of the nursing care to safely provide care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During the entrance conference interview, the Administrator (ADM) on 3/24/2026 at 9:21 AM, the ADM stated multiple rooms in the facility did not have the required 80 square feet of space per resident, but the facility had a room waiver (a permit approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for rooms that did not meet the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (4) out of twenty-two (22) resident's rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 5, 20, and 26) accommodated no more than four residents in each room. The 4 resident rooms consisted of 2 (two) - twelve (12) bed capacity rooms, 1 (one), seven (7) bed capacity room, and 1 (one), six (6) bed capacity rooms. This deficient practice had the potential adversely affect the delivery of care, quality of life, safety and violate the resident's rights for privacy. Findings: During the entrance conference interview, the Administrator (ADM) on 2/11/2025 at 9:20 AM, the ADM stated there were four rooms in the facility that occupied more than four residents in each room, but the facility had a waiver (a permit approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for rooms that did not meet the regulation requirement) in place and would like to request an additional waiver this year. The ADM stated, the multiple beds per room had no impact on care of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft., unit of measurement) per resident for twelve (12) out of twenty-two (22) resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 21, 26, 27, 28, 30, and 31). The 12 resident rooms consisted of 1 (one), twelve (12) bed capacity room, 1 (one), seven (7) bed capacity room, 2 (two), four (4) bed capacity rooms, 2 (two), three (3) bed capacity rooms, and 6 (six), two (2) bed capacity rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the quality-of-care and the ability to of the nursing care to safely provide care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an entrance conference with the Administrator (ADM) on 2/11/2025 at 9:20 AM, the ADM stated multiple rooms in the facility did not have the required 80 square feet of space per resident, but the facility had a room waiver (a permit approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for rooms that did not meet the regulation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (4) out of twenty-two (22) resident's rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 5, 20, and 26) accommodated no more than four residents in each room. The 4 resident rooms consisted of 2 (two) - twelve (12) bed capacity rooms, 1 (one), seven (7) bed capacity room, and 1 (one), six (6) bed capacity rooms. This deficient practice had the potential adversely affect the delivery of care, quality of life, safety and violate the resident's rights for privacy. Findings: During the entrance conference interview, the Administrator (ADM) on 3/12/24 at 8:55 a.m., the ADM stated there were four rooms in the facility that did not have the required no more than four residents in each room, but the facility had a waiver (a permit approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for rooms that did not meet the regulation requirement) in place and would like to request an additional waiver this year. The ADM stated, the multiple beds per room had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft., unit of measurement) per resident for twelve (12) out of twenty-two (22) resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 21, 26, 27, 28, 30, and 31). The 12 resident rooms consisted of 1 (one), twelve (12) bed capacity rooms, 1 (one), seven (7) bed capacity room, 2 (two), four (4) bed capacity rooms, 2 (two), three (3) bed capacity rooms, and 6 (six), two (2) bed capacity rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the quality-of-care and the ability to of the nursing care to safely provide care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an entrance conference with the Administrator (ADM) on 3/12/24 at 8:55 a.m., the ADM stated multiple rooms in the facility did not have the required 80 square feet of space per resident, but the facility had a room waiver (a permit approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for rooms that did not meet the regulation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-09-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 2.4 | +2.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2024 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/18/2025 |
| LIU, PAUL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| MEJIA, LEANNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/27/2021 |
| MONTEREY WELLNESS GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/15/2013 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/15/2013 |
| ERETZ MONTEREY PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555897. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.