No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ivy Creek Healthcare & Wellness Centre

115 Bridge St., San Gabriel, CA 91775 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (626) 289-4439 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 289-4439 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Feb 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
533 W Las Tunas Dr # 102 · (626) 656-6939 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
704 W Las Tunas Dr # E6 · (626) 962-5300 · Call to confirm hours
Park
250 S Mission Dr · (626) 308-2875 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
837 W Las Tunas Dr · (828) 268-2229

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.0%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.9%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.702.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.311.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.68U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.31hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.2%CMS range 30.2–50.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.4–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.6%CMS range 7.4–15.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.781.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 92.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-21)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for two (2) of two residents (Resident 54 and 104) reviewed for dignity, in accordance with the facility's policy when: 1. Facility staff did not address Resident 54 by the resident's preferred name and used the term [NAME] on 5/18/2026.2. Facility staff did not address Resident 58 by the resident's preferred name and used the term Mama on 5/19/2026. These deficient practices had the potential to affect Residents 54 and 58 senses of self-worth and self-esteem which could result in problems with emotional and mental well-being. Findings:1. During a review of Resident 54's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), heart failure (a lifelong condition in which the heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a homelike environment was established for 34 of 47 rooms (Rooms A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, FF, GG and HH) by failing to ensure the rooms were free from peeled wallpaper, missing paint on the walls and/or had functional drawers. These deficient practices can negatively affect the comfort and psychosocial wellbeing of the residents residing in the 34 rooms.Findings:During an interview on 5/20/2026 at 2:46 PM with Certified Nursing Assistant 4 (CNA 4), CNA 4 stated a homelike environment should be provided for residents and if paint or wallpaper is missing from the walls in the residents' rooms, it should be fixed. CNA 4 further added, the wallpaper and paint should be complete so that residents are comfortable, feel safe and the resident will feel better having a pretty rooms. During an interview on 5/20/2026 at 3:08 PM with Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3), LVN 3 stated a homelike environment allows for residents not to feel like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 11) reviewed for unnecessary medication reflect the resident's use of antipsychotic (AP, drug that works by altering brain chemistry to help reduce psychotic symptoms like hallucinations [an experience which a person sees, hears, feels, or smells something that does not exist], delusions [fixed false beliefs], and disordered thinking) medication on the Antipsychotic Medication Review (a structured, interprofessional evaluation of a resident's antipsychotic drug therapy to assess effectiveness, monitor side effects, and determine the need for continued use, dose reduction, or withdrawal) and its gradual dose reduction (GDR, a stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) as indicated on the facility's policy. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) Level 1 Screening (initial screening completed prior to admission to a nursing facility to identify individuals who have mental disorder [mental illness] or intellectual disability [ID, an individual with a level of retardation]) accurately for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 43), reviewed for PASARR. This resulted in the inaccurate conclusion that Resident 43 did not require a Level 2 PASARR Evaluation (comprehensive evaluation conducted by the appropriate state-designated authority that determines whether an individual has MD, ID or a related condition, determines the appropriate setting for the individual, and recommends what, if any, specialized services and/or rehabilitative services the individual needs) completed, with the potential for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident based on the resident's needs) to address one (1) of 21 resident's (Resident 43) anxiety (mental disorder involves persistent and excessive worry that can interfere with daily activities). This failure had the potential for Resident 43 to receive care that was not personalized to meet the resident's specific needs for anxiety, which could negatively affect her overall wellbeing.Findings:During a review of Resident 43's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a review of Resident 43's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 3/18/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 43 had severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) were provided for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Residents 4 and 72) reviewed for ADL care area by failing to ensure:1. Resident 4's fingernails on both hands were kept clean.2. Resident 72 received oral care as needed to prevent the resident's lips from becoming chapped (a condition where the lips become dry, cracked, and peeling). These failures had the potential for Residents 4 and 72 to develop skin breakdown and infection, which would negatively affect Resident 4 and 72's wellbeing. Findings 1. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], Resident 4's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM, is a metabolic disease, involving inappropriately elevated blood glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the use of insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents (Residents 4, and 31) reviewed for unnecessary medications (any drug when used without adequate monitoring, and without adequate indication for use) and insulin use as indicated on the residents' care plan by failing to monitor: 1. Resident 4 for signs and symptoms (s/s) of hypoglycemia (an abnormally low level of sugar [glucose] in the blood) and hyperglycemia (a condition where the blood glucose [sugar] levels are abnormally high), while on Lantus Solostar (Insulin Glargine [Lantus, a type of long-acting insulin]) and Novolin R ( Regular human Insulin, a short-acting insulin) from 4/30/2026 to 5/21/2026. 2. Resident 31 for s/s of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia while on Lantus Solostar and Humulin R (is a short-acting human insulin) from 2/28/2026 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection prevention control practices (a set of practices that prevent or stop the spread of infections and or diseases in the healthcare setting) were followed for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 4 and 10) reviewed for tube feeding (enteral nutrition, delivers liquid nutrition through a flexible tube that goes in through the nose or directly into the stomach or small intestine) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. Resident 4's tube feeding machine (enteral feeding pump which delivers liquid nutrition /formula directly into the stomach or small intestine via a feeding tube) had beige - colored stains and the resident's intravenous pole (IV pole, is a slender, portable medical stand used in healthcare settings to hold bags or bottles of fluids, medications, or nutrients) where the TF machine was attached had brown and beige - colored stains. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a functional call light (used in healthcare facilities as an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a resident when in need) for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 58) reviewed for environment as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential not to meet Resident 58's needs, which could negatively affect the resident's overall wellbeing. Findings:During a review of Resident 58's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], Resident 58's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD, condition when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus and causes heartburn [ a painful, burning feeling in the middle of the chest]), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address the recurrent behavior fluctuations of manic mood (mental state of an extreme highs or depressive lows) of verbally aggressive towards staff/others and diminished interest/pleasure in usual Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily), for (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 2) while on Depakote (drug used to calm overactive nerves in the brain). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being hit on the left leg by Resident 2's right hand and had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for physical and psychosocial harm.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness that may occur as a reaction to stress) and bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 37 and 43) on dialysis (a lifesaving treatment for residents with kidney failure) treatment, a safe and appropriate care in accordance with the facility's policy by failing to ensure: 1a. Resident 37's fluid intake was restricted to 1200 milliliters (ml, unit of volume) per day as indicated on the physician's orders and care plan. 1b. A current Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, group of healthcare professionals from diverse fields who work in a coordinated manner toward a common goal for the resident) meeting was conducted for Resident 37's fluid restriction noncompliance. 2. Resident 43's fluid intake was restricted to 1000 ml per day as indicated on the physician's order and care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to result in overloading (harmful amount of fluid in the body) Resident's 37 and 43 with fluid which could cause complications such as swelling, high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as indicated on facility policy for three (3) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 245, 4 and 11), by failing to administer: 1. Resident 245's cyclobenzaprine (a muscle relaxer that treats muscle spasms) between 7 AM and 9 AM. 2. Resident 4's bethanechol (medication that stimulates the bladder to urinate), metoprolol (medication that lowers blood pressure), verquvo (medication that reduces risks of death or hospitalization with heart failure), eliquis (medication that reduces blood clotting), entresto (medication that reduces stress on the heart and strengthens the heart's pumping action) between 8 AM and 10 AM. 3. Resident 11's amlodipine (medication to lower blood pressure) and clopidogrel (medication that prevents blood platelets from sticking together) between 8 AM and 10 AM. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse reactions (an undesired harmful effect resulting from a medication or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). Eight (8) medication errors (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order/ manufacturer's specifications/accepted professional standards and principles) out of 26 opportunities (observed administered medications) for error, which yielded a facility medication error rate of 30.77% for three (3) of four (4) sampled residents (Residents 245, 4 and 11) observed during medication administration (med pass). The medication errors were as follows: 1. Resident 245's cyclobenzaprine (a muscle relaxer that treats muscle spasms) was not administered between 7 AM and 9 AM. 2. Resident 4's bethanechol (medication that stimulates the bladder to urinate), metoprolol (medication that lowers blood pressure), verquvo (medication that reduces risks of death or hospitalization with heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of 3 dumpsters (a movable waste container designed to be brought and taken away) were closed and not overflowing, in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Waste Management. This deficient practice had a potential to attract vermin (animals that are believed to be harmful, carry diseases such as rodents, parasitic worms, or insects), pests (any living thing that has a negative effect on humans), and wildlife (undomesticated animal species) and may cause disease and other health issues to residents, staff, and the community. Findings: During an observation on 4/7/2025 at 7:34 AM at the west side of the facility building, 3 dumpsters located outside the facility building, near the facility entrance and parking area were observed overflowing with empty boxes and clear plastic bag containing kitchen trash. During a concurrent observation of the 3 dumpsters outside the facility and interview on 4/7/2025 at 7:54 AM with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the DSS stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to obtain an accurate water temperature reading and ensure the water used to wash two loads of soiled linens in two (2) of 2 washing machines had the correct temperature in accordance with the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise infection control measures to eliminate disease causing bacteria, germs, and viruses on linens which could get residents sick and potentially spread infection in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/9/2025 at 9:27 AM in the laundry room with Laundry 1 (LD 1), LD 1 stated LD 1 did not check the thermometer for the water temperature in the washing machine. LD 1 stated there were 2 loads of white linens currently being washed in washing machines 1 and 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/9/2025 at 9:34 AM with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS stated the thermometer to check for the water temperature of the washing machine was broken. MS stated the reading on the thermometer was between 70-80…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote respect and dignity for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 56) by not providing privacy during brief change. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 56 to experience loss of dignity, self-esteem, and affect resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included history of falling, adult failure to thrive (adults whose independence is declining), bed confinement status (unable to get up from bed without assistance, unable to ambulate, and unable to sit in a chair or wheelchair). During a review of Resident 56's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 3/21/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 56 cognitive skills (processes of thinking and reasoning) for daily decision making was severely impaired (never/rarely made decisions). The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 245's admission Record, the admission Record indicated resident 245 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD - chronic digestive disease where the contents of the stomach refluxes and irritates the esophagus) and fusion of thoracic spine (a surgical procedure where two or more bones in the mid-back are joined together to eliminate movement between them). During a review of Resident 245's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 245 was moderately impaired with cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS also indicated Resident 245 was dependent (helper does all effort needed to complete activity) with toileting hygiene and dressing, required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort needed to complete the activity) with bathing, and required partial/ moderate assistance (helper does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dental care plan (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident based on the resident's needs) was reviewed and revised for one (1) of 19 residents (Resident 28) after the completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) on 2/19/2025 and based on the assessed needs of the resident as indicated in the facility's policy. This failure had the potential for Resident 28 to receive inappropriate care and/or inadequate services, negatively affecting Resident 28's well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (inability to move one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids) following cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply Geri sleeves (protective sleeves that prevent tearing, bruising, and abrasions of the skin) for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 4) as indicated on the physician's order. This failure had the potential for Resident 4 to acquire additional skin tears (traumatic wounds caused by friction when the upper layer of the skin becomes torn from the underlying layers) to the arms and a lack of services to attain or maintain his highest practicable physical well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure (a sudden condition in which not enough oxygen passes from the lungs into the blood), muscle weakness, and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 3/10/2025, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the site of blood pressure measurement for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 20), for consistent monitoring and clinical interpretation. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the accuracy of clinical assessments and medical management of Resident 20. Findings: During a review of Resident 20's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD- Condition in which the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for regular course of long-term dialysis or kidney transplant to maintain life) and required hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed). During a review of Resident 20's Order Summary, dated 3/9/2025, indicated no Blood Pressure checks, no blood draw on left arm as appropriate, dialysis (hemodialysis) access site:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (a visible and audible alarm activated by a call button) for one of 19 of sampled residents (Resident 3) was within reach as indicated on care plan and facility's policy. This failure had the potential to result in the inability for Resident 3 to obtain necessary care and services which could result to harm/injury to the resident. Findings: During a record review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy (abnormalities of water, electrolytes, vitamins, and other chemicals that adversely affect the brain function), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and cerebral infarction (a stroke, damage to tissue in the brain due to loss of oxygen to the area). During a record review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain safe, clean, comfortable sanitary and home like environment for one (1) of (3) three sampled residents (Resident 56) for the environment care area by failing to ensure the linen bin was not overflowing in Room A. This deficient practice caused an unsanitary environment and had a potential for residents to be placed at risk for serious illness and/ or injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included history of falling, adult failure to thrive (adults whose independence is declining), bed confinement status (unable to get up from bed without assistance, unable to ambulate, and unable to sit in a chair or wheelchair). During a review of Resident 56's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 3/21/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 56 cognitive skills (processes of thinking and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document the administration of the two (2) doses of intravenous (IV, directly into the blood stream) antibiotics (medicines that treat bacterial infections by killing or stopping the growth of bacteria0 medication on to the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 4) in accordance with the Medication Administration policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the doubling up of medications (taking the dose twice). Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs). During a review of the Physician ' s Order dated 2/6/2024 at 8 PM, the Physicians order indicated cefepime HCL (antibiotics used to treat pneumonia) 1 gram (gm, unit of measurement), IV to be given 2 times a day until 2/10/2025 10:24 PM. During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a communication board (a device that displays photos, symbols, or illustrations to help people with limited language skills express themselves) for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) that was readily accessible with the language the residents were able to understand in accordance with the facility's policy. This failure had the potential for Residents 1 and 2 to experience a delay in receiving appropriate care and treatment and feeling lonely and isolated due to the staff not being able to properly communicate with the residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re- admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (ME, occurs when problems with your metabolism cause brain dysfunction), diabetes mellitus (DM, is a metabolic disease, involving inappropriately elevated blood glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish) on 1/23/2025 for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 1) within two (2) hour timeframe to the State Survey Agency (SA, where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities), the state ombudsman (advocates for residents of nursing homes, board and care homes and assisted living facilities), and local law enforcement. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise or impede the protection of Resident 1, which could affect the resident's emotional and mental wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re- admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (ME, occurs when problems with your metabolism…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a homelike environment for three (3) of four (4) sampled residents (Residents 19, 81, and 20) for the environment care area by: 1. and 2. Failing to provide Residents 19 and 81 a room without unfinished and peeling paint on the walls and unmaintained baseboards (wooden or plastic board covering the lowest part of a wall). 2. Leaving a plastic cup of frozen beverage, owned by staff, on top of Resident 20's hand sanitizer dispenser. These deficient practices have the potential for an unsafe and unsanitary resident's environment which had the potential to negatively affect the resident's quality of life. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 19's admission Record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease characterized by long term poor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy to ensure licensed nurses administer oxygen to two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Resident 143 and 85) for Respiratory Care area, as indicated on the care plan. This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 143 and 85 not to receive the appropriate respiratory care and services, which can affect the residents' overall wellbeing. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 143's admission Record indicated resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and chronic kidney disease (long standing disease of the kidneys [organs that filter waste and excess fluid from the blood] leading to renal failure [a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids]). A review of Resident 143's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/8/24, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the storage, preparation and distribution of food were done under sanitary conditions by failing to ensure: 1. One red fruit Jello was labeled with use by date and expiration date. 2. Apple sauce tray cups were labeled with a use by date. 3. [NAME] noodles and garlic bag were labeled with received, use by, and expiration date. 4. Expired cilantro bag was not mixed in with carrots in same container. 5. Chorizo container labeled as Chorizo, contained a bacon and not a chorizo. These deficient practices have the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever, which could lead to hospitalization. Findings: 1. 2. and 3. During concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Staff Supervisor (DSS) on 4/9/24 at 8:30 AM, DSS confirmed there was no use by date on a red fruit Jello container in the walk in freezer. DSS also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced dignity and respect in full recognition of the resident's individuality for two (2) of 19 sampled residents (Resident 11 and 37). The facility staff was observed standing above the resident's eye level while assisting the resident during a meal. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 11's and 37's self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of, but not limited to, dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning), dysphagia oropharyngeal phase (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the throat). A review of Resident 11's History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/3/24 indicated Resident 11 does not have the capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs of three (3) of 19 sampled residents (Resident 37, 73, and 3) by failing to have residents call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a resident when in need) within reach. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents not to be able to call the staff for assistance, which could result to not receiving or delayed needed care or services necessary for the residents' well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 37's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and protein-calorie malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition caused by not eating enough). A review of Resident 37's History and Physical (H&P), dated 2/29/24, indicated resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to provide privacy and confidentiality (safeguarding the content of information including video, audio, or other computer stored information from unauthorized disclosure without the consent of the resident and/or the individual's surrogate or representative) of the resident's medical records by not closing the unattended computer screen for one (1) of 19 sampled residents (Resident 11). This deficient practice violated Resident 11's right for privacy and confidentiality. Findings: A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of, but not limited to, dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning), dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (swallowing problems occurring in the mouth and/or the throat). A review of Resident 11's History and Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0642 — isolated
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) signed and certified the Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized assessment and care screening tool)/ Care Area Assessment (CAA, provides guidance to focus on key issues identified in the comprehensive MDS) for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 84), for Resident Assessment Care Area, in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an incomplete assessment and inaccurate depiction of resident specific issues affecting the development of an individualized care plan. Findings: A review of Resident 84's admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, body's failure to regulate and use sugar as a fuel). A review of Resident 84's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/10/23, indicated Resident 84 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 84's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 18) to ensure the head of bed (HOB) was elevated while resident was on oxygen. This deficient practice had the potential to result in complications from hypoxia (lack of sufficient oxygen in the body) and can lead to shortness of breath, rapid breathing, confusion, and loss of consciousness, and irregular heartbeat. Findings: A review of Resident 18's admission Record indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included COVID -19 (Coronavirus, a respiratory illness caused by a virus that can spread from person to person), pneumonia (an infection that affects one or both lungs) due to Coronavirus disease 2019, and respiratory failure. A review of Resident 18's History and Physical Examination (H&P), dated 1/5/24, indicated Resident 18 did not have capacity to make decisions due to dementia. A review of Resident 18's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 17) for the activities of daily living (ADL) care area, who was unable to carry out ADL received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 17 having white crust on the eyelids and brownish stains around the mouth. Findings: A review of Resident 17's admission Record indicated resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis of dementia (Impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and encounter for palliative care (interdisciplinary [combination of multiple academic disciplines into one activity] medical caregiving approach aimed at optimizing quality of life and mitigating suffering among people with serious, complex, and often terminal illness). A review of Resident 17's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/1/23, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 19 sampled residents (Residents 3 and 30) received treatment and care in accordance with the physician's order, care plan, and professional standards of practice by failing to: 1. Ensure facility staff applied Resident 3's abdominal binder (a wide compression belt that wraps around the abdomen) to prevent the gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a flexible tube surgically inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for feeding, fluid, and medication administration) dislodgement as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 3 pulling her g-tube and suffer complications and hospitalization. 2. Reassess and monitor Resident 30's right big toe as indicated in the resident's care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the recurrence of Resident 30's diabetic foot ulcer (an open wound that occurs in approximately 15 percent of residents with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a coordination of care between facility and hospice (care designed to give supportive care to people in the final phase of a terminal illness and focus on comfort and quality of life, rather than cure) staff for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 79), for hospice care area, by failing to ensure Hospice nursing/ visitation notes were maintained in the resident's medical record, in accordance with the hospice policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay or lack of coordination in delivery of hospice care and services to Resident 79. Findings: A review of Resident 79's admission Record indicated Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and eventually the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), iron deficiency anemia (a condition in which the blood does not have enough healthy red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enforce its policy and procedure on infection control by : 1. Certified Nursing Assistant 6 (CNA 6) did not perform hand hygiene after doffing (remove) dirty gloves and donning (put on) clean gloves during resident care. 2. CNA 7 picked up resident's nasal cannula tubing (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen from the tube to nose) off the floor and connecting it to the oxygen concentrator (a device that concentrates oxygen by removing nitrogen giving a supply of 95% oxygen) from the floor and attached it to the resident's oxygen concentrator. 3. Failing to disinfect the laundry washers after every use. These deficient practices have the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for the residents. Findings: 1. and 2. A review of Resident 143's admission Record indicated resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of dementia (impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain equipment in the kitchen in safe operating condition when the kitchen burners did not ignite when [NAME] turned knob on 4/9/24. This failure had the potential to cause the staff to burn their hands while igniting burners, which could result to hospitalization and death. Findings: During the initial tour observation and interview with DSS (Dietary Staff Supervisor) and [NAME] on 4/9/24 at 8:58 AM, [NAME] turned one of the kitchen burners on with a piece of paper. [NAME] stated he usually turns the burner on that way because the flame is small and that way, he can get the flame to be bigger. During an interview with DSS on 4/9/24 at 9:01 AM, DSS stated, The cook uses the paper to ignite the burners, he should not ignite them with paper it's dangerous, there's an igniter we use for that, maybe he misplaced it. During concurrent interview with [NAME] on 4/9/24 at 9:03 AM, [NAME] stated, I've burned myself before when igniting the burners. I do have an igniter, a lighter, but sometimes the staff will borrow it when they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control (methods used to prevent, control, or stop the spread of infections) precautions by having expired alcohol hand sanitizer bottles available and used throughout the facility. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of bacteria, viruses and pathogens (harmful microorganisms) to residents, visitors and staff while increasing the risk of infections. Findings: During an observation on [DATE] at 12:28 pm at the front lobby, two visitors seen using bottled alcohol sanitizer with an expiration date of 6/2022. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 12:31 pm with Central Supply Manager (CSM) at the indoor facility supply cabinet, seven bottles of alcohol hand sanitizer found with expiration dates of 6/2022. CSM stated these bottles should not be used and should have been thrown away. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 12:36 pm with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility supplies for resident care and treatment, including Personal protective equipment (PPE- equipment worn to minimize exposure and spread of illnesses) and gastrostomy tube (GT - a tube that is surgically inserted into the resident's stomach to allow access for food fluids and medications) feedings (nutritious and caloric supplements) were stored in a safe and sanitary environment. This failure had the potential for staff to use contaminated (the presence of an infectious agent on or inside) supplies during the care and treatments provided to the residents and increasing the possible spread of bacteria, viruses, and pathogens (harmful microorganisms). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/24/2024 at 12:55 pm with Central Supply Manager (CSM- responsible for ordering, storing, inspecting and distributing supplies as needed for patient care) at the facility's supply storage shed, the following were observed: 1. Three stacked boxes of supplies damp to touch with a mixture of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement intervention to prevent falls (multiple factors that increases an older person's chance of falling) for two out of three sampled residents (Resident 1 2) by failing to place fall risk identifiers for Resident 1 and 2 in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 2 being at risk for falling and possibly sustaining a serious bodily injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted in the facility on 11/7/22 with diagnoses that included other seizures (a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells (also called neurons or nerve cells) that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements (stiffness, twitching or limpness), behaviors, sensations or states of awareness), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM, A group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood) without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices (a set of practices that prevent or stop the spread of infections and or diseases in healthcare settings) were followed for six (6) of seven (7) sampled resident (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. The facility failed to ensure indwelling catheter (is a closed sterile system with a catheter and retention balloon that lets urine leave your bladder and your body to allow for bladder drainage) bag for Resident 1 was not touching the floor. 2. The facility failed to follow standard precautions (a set of infection control practices used to prevent transmission of diseases that can be acquired by contact with blood, body fluids, non-intact skin, and mucous membranes) by failing to remove soiled gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene (the act of cleaning one's hands with soap and water to remove viruses/bacteria/microorganisms, dirt, grease, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (4) of 47 resident bedrooms measure at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms. Rooms 24, 26, 28, and 44 measured less than 80 sq. ft. per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the residents in these rooms not to have enough room for activities of daily living and hinder staff from providing care to the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's room waiver (a legal document which allows to give up certain legal rights or claims), dated 4/7/2025, the waiver indicated that these rooms did not meet the requirements for 80 square feet per bed. The room waiver also indicated these rooms had adequate space for nursing care, and the health and safety of the residents occupying these rooms are not in jeopardy. The room waiver further indicated these rooms were in accordance with the needs of the residents and would not have an adverse effect on the residents' health and safety or impede the ability of any resident to attain his or her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (4) of 47 resident bedrooms measure at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms. Rooms 24, 26, 28, and 44 measured less than 80 sq. ft. per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the residents in these rooms not to have enough room for activities of daily living and hinder staff from providing care to the residents. Findings: During a general observation of the facility from 4/9/24 to 4/12/24 of Rooms 24, 26, 28, and 44, room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied by two residents with one empty bed. room [ROOM NUMBER], 28 and 44 were occupied with three residents. The spaces were sufficient for the resident's use and staff had enough space to safely provide care to the residents. A concurrent interview with the Administrator and review of the Client Accommodation Analysis record on 4/11/24 at 12:01 PM, the Administrator stated the record indicated Rooms 24, 26, 28, and 44, did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Creek Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Coral Cove Post AcuteLong Beach, CA 1 of 5East Terrace Rehabilitation & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Four Seasons Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Hawthorne Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPHawthorne, CA 1 of 5Los Feliz Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Mar Vista Country Villa Healthcare & WellnessLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Oakwood Healthcare CenterChico, CA 1 of 5Pioneers Memorial Skilled Nursing CenterBrawley, CA 1 of 5Plaza Healthcare CenterSanta Ana, CA 2 of 5Anaheim PointAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Bay Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Chico Terrace Care CenterChico, CA 2 of 5Claremont Heights Post AcuteClaremont, CA 2 of 5Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Fortuna Rehabilitation And Wellness Center, LPFortuna, CA 2 of 5Granada Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Montecito Heights Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Pasadena Park Healthcare And Wellness CenterPasadena, CA 2 of 5San Rafael Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPSan Rafael, CA 2 of 5Tulare Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPTulare, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post Acute CareLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5York Healthcare & Wellness CentreLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Alhambra Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPAlhambra, CA 3 of 5Bay Marina Post AcuteOakland, CA 3 of 5Monterey Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRosemead, CA 3 of 5Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPOntario, CA 3 of 5Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Pavilion On Pico Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Princeton Manor Healthcare Center, LLCOakland, CA 3 of 5Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 4 of 5Kings Healthcare & Wellness Center LPHanford, CA 4 of 5Pine Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPSan Gabriel, CA 4 of 5River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRedding, CA 4 of 5West Hollywood Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPVisalia, CA 5 of 5North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPFresno, CA 5 of 5Oxnard Manor Healthcare CenterOxnard, CA 5 of 5West Pico Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2012
QIU, BOSHENGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
YU, CANDACEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2022
G4 WELLNESS GP LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2012
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2012
WEISS, JONATHANIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2012
ERETZ IVY CREEK PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 24%Other / private 8%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$403per resident / day
operating cost
$12,245per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$430per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055441. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next