York Healthcare & Wellness Centre
6071 York Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90042 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 107 certified beds · (323) 254-3407 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $99,206 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-07)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.34 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.72 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.0%CMS range 30.2–56.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.2–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 3.9–13.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.64 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 101.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide treatments and services for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1's food allergy and allergic reaction to fish were transcribed and verified in the resident's Dietary Profile and Meal Ticket, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure on Food Allergies and Reference Sheets, and Diet Record Maintenance to alert facility staff of the resident's food allergies. 2. Ensure Resident 1's care plan (a nursing care plan provides direction on the type of nursing care the individual may need) on food allergy was developed to include the type of allergic reaction manifested by the resident and implemented the care plan on food allergy (fish allergy) to ensure Resident 1 was free from allergic reaction. 3. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 communicated with the facility's Dietary Department by indicating Resident 1's fish allergy on the Diet Communication Slip upon Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals did not contain food allergens (a substance that causes an allergic reaction) for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) with known food allergies, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures titled Food Allergies and Reference Sheets, by: 1. Serving fish and fish containing products to Resident 1 who was allergic to fish. The facility was aware Resident 1 had fish allergy but Resident 1 was served fish on 11/24/2023 (tuna salad sandwich) and 12/1/2023 (lemon ginger fish). 2. Serving wheat (a cereal that yields a fine white flour used chiefly in breads, baked goods, and pastas) containing foods to Resident 2 who was allergic to wheat. On 12/5/23, during a lunch tray line (an area used to dish out resident's food) observation, kitchen staff served triple fruit crisp and garlic white bread that contained wheat to Resident 2. The facility was aware Resident 2 was allergic to wheat. 3. Ensuring the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 1), who was at risk for fall due to poor safety awareness and history of repeated falls was provided care and services to prevent recurrent falls in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure a fall assessment and reassessment was conducted to identify the risk factors and cause of each fall, in accordance with the facility ' s Fall Management Program. 2. Ensure the care plan interventions were revised after each unwitnessed falls ([DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]) by addressing what caused the fall that included identifying the resident ' s behavior, poor safety awareness due to severe cognition impairment and inability to communicate as a result of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), in accordance with the facility ' s P&P on Dementia Care. 3. Ensure to communicate to all facility staff Resident 1 ' s need for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three certified nurse assistants (CNA 1) maintained a valid certification while providing resident care. CNA 1's certification expired on [DATE], and the facility did not identify the expired status until [DATE]. As a result, CNA 1 provided resident care for 2 years, 6 months, and 4 days without a valid CNA certificate. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for harm, including inadequate care, neglect, and possible abuse due to the CNA 1 providing care without a valid certification.Findings: During a review of the facility's Monthly Schedule CNA Department from 1/2026 to 4/2026, the monthly schedule indicated that CNA 1 was scheduled to work at the facility five days weekly in 1/2026 and 2/2026. The schedule indicated CNA 1's last day of work was [DATE]. During a review of an untitled facility-provided document provided by the Payroll, the document indicated CNA 1's Employee Status was recorded as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure titled, Abuse Prevention and Management for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by, Failing to report to the State Agency (SA where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities), ombudsman (advocates for residents of nursing homes, board and care homes and assisted living facilities) and local enforcement within 2 hours after Resident 1 reported an allegation of physical abuse to the facility. 2. Failing to thoroughly investigate, protect and prevent the possibilities of further abuse happening to Resident 1 and other residents in the facility. These deficient practices lead to Resident 1 feeling unsafe, frustrated for not being taken seriously. Potentially result in recurrences of abuse that could affect Resident 1 and other residents in the facility's health, mental and emotional wellbeing and safety.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserved flavor and temperature for three (3) of 3 sampled residents (Resident 9, 77 and 78) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Food Temperatures These failures had the potential to result in decreased meal consumption and negatively affect the health and well-being of residents receiving meals in the facility. Findings: During a review of the admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 78 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis myocardial infarction ( heart attack) , hemiplegia (loss of movement on one side of body) and hemiparesis ( weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction ( Stroke) , and multiple sclerosis ( chronic neurological disease where the immune system attacks the protective covering of nerves in the brain and spinal cord). During a review of Resident 78's Dietary profile - V7 dated 3/3/26, the profile indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures, titled Food Storage and Handling , Refrigerated Storage Guide, Produce Storage Guideline, and Ice Machine& Ice Storage Chest to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness (an infection or irritation of the gastrointestinal tract caused by consuming food or beverages contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or chemical toxins) for 96 of 99 residents receiving food from the kitchen . The facility failed to: Discard 9 cucumbers beyond labeled use-by date 5/16/2026 stored in the refrigerator. Label and store one case of frozen boneless chicken thighs that indicates Received date and use-by-date. Cover the opening of an opened carton of liquid whole egg when stored in the walk-in refrigerator. Keep the ice scoop/bin in a covered container when not in use. These deficient practices posing a risk for bacterial growth and foodborne illness and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system was properly maintained to provide a safe and comfortable environment for 97 residents. The HVAC unit servicing the conference room malfunctioned and emitted a burnt plastic odor and white smoke into the facility. The malfunctioning HVAC unit had the potential to adversely affect resident health and safety by exposing residents to smoke and burnt odors, causing respiratory discomfort, anxiety, and the need for emergency response measures. During a review of the facility Maintenance Log titled Checking HVAC and Coils, changing filters dated 1/2026 to 5/2026, indicated that routine inspections that were documented for HVAC Units 1 through 9 were documented. During a review of the Heating & Air conditioning Invoice dated 5/20/2026, indicated that HVAC #6 had a bad contactor (electrical component) that needed to be replaced. During an observation on 5/21/2026 at 12:39 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a comprehensive care plan for one out of four sampled residents (Resident 4) when the Resident 4's foley catheter (a thin hollow tube that is inserted through the opening of the urinary tract into a person's bladder and is used to drain the bladder into an external collection bag) was changed as a result of a change in condition due to significantly cloudy urine in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Person-Centered Care Planning and Change in Condition. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 4 to be at risk for complications related to the use of foley catheter such as infection and injury due to accidental removal of the catheter if notFindings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of the prostate gland that commonly leads to difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the comprehensive care plan for one out of three sample residents (Resident 39) to address the interventions and goals needed for Resident 39's was ordered to receive prednisone (a medication that suppresses the immune system and reduce inflammation) in accordance with policy and procedure titled Person-Centered Care Planning and Adverse Drug Reactions. This deficient practice placed Resident 39 at risk of not to be monitored and receive immediate care for the potential side effects of the medication, such as the risk of infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, inflammatory polyarthropathy (clinical term describing inflammation in five or more joints), and hemiparesis (partial weakness, numbness, or reduced control on one entire side of the body). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 2) who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good oral hygiene as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure titled 'Oral Care. This deficient practice had the potential to result in discomfort, pain, impaired oral health, and a decline in overall well- being. Findings: During a review of Resident 2' s admission Record ( AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) quadriplegia( unable to move all four limbs and is completely dependent on others for mobility and activities of daily living) , and atherosclerotic heart disease( a form of heart disease caused buildup of plaque or fatty deposits in the arteries that supply blood to the heart). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical dated 2/27/2026, indicated Resident 2 does not have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident receives care consistent with professional standard of practice to prevent pressure ulcers (a skin breakdown due to unrelieved pressure and friction to the skin) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 22), who was a high risk to develop pressure ulcer, with a waffle mattress (mattress to prevent pressure ulcer) overlay setting at 140 (firmness setting of the mattress 80 [soft] - 280 [firm] ) as per physicians order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in development of pressure ulcer and/or skin breakdown, which could negatively affect Resident 22's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Residents 22's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (brain condition that causes problems with movement), peripheral vascular disease (progressive circulation disorder), and muscle weakness. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and hazard free environment in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Safety and Maintenance Service for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was observed lying in bed under his overhead light fixture with plastic cover sagging and not properly secured. This deficient practice had the potential for the light fixture plastic cover to fall on to Resident 1 and cause injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included wedge compression fracture the lumbar vertebra (a broken bone in the lower back), bilateral hip osteoarthritis (the smooth cartilage that cushions the ends of your bones gradually wears away over time, causing bones to rub against each other and resulting in pain, stiffness, and swelling), and generalized muscle weakness. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 34 and 4) received appropriate treatment and services for urinary care in accordance with the professional standard of practice and facility's policy and procedures titled Indwelling Catheter, Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (2009) (CAUTI, a catheter associated UTI (an infection of the urinary tract that includes urethra, ureters, bladder and kidneys resulting when microorganism gets into the urine and travels to the urinary tract) and Suprapubic Catheter Re-insertion and Management. The facility failing to: 1. For Resident 4, the foley catheter (a thin hollow tube that is inserted through the opening of the urinary tract into a person's bladder and is used to drain the bladder into an external collection bag) was not monitored for use and no date when the catheter was inserted following a change in condition when the resident's urine was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to insure one out of eight sampled residents (Resident 2) offered and received the sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration as recommended by the Registered Dietitian (RD) baseline daily fluid intake (calculated fluid a resident should consume each day) to ensure proper hydration. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 2's continued dehydration (fluid deficit), impaired oral health, kidney damage, urinary tract infections, hospitalizations, and could result in a decline in the resident's overall condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 2' s admission Record ( AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) quadriplegia (unable to move all four limbs and is completely dependent on others for mobility and activities of daily living) , and atherosclerotic heart disease (a form of heart disease caused by the buildup of plaque and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two out of three medication rooms (MR), did not contain medications that were past the discard by date in accordance with the policy MR 2 contained two bags of Ertapenem (an antibiotic, medication that is used to treat infections) that were past the discard date. MR 3 contained one syringe of Enbrel (a medication used to reduce inflammation and swelling) that was past the discard date. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to be administered expired medications, which could lack the intended efficacy to treat the residents' diseases. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 69's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypotension (low blood pressure), muscle weakness, and diabetes mellitus (condition characterized by high blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 69's History and Physical (H&P),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of documentation for two out of four sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 94) who were observed during medication administration in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures titled Medication Administration- General Guidelines, by failing to ensure: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not document the administration of Resident 94's meclizine (a medication used to treat dizziness) prior to the administration of the medication. 2. LVN 1 did not document the administration of Resident 9's acetaminophen (a medication used to control pain) prior to the administration of the medication. This deficient practice had the potential to cause inaccuracies in the residents' records, which could cause the misadministration of medications. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 94's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated that the resident was originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's policy and procedure for infection control by failing to ensure a safe and sanitary environment to prevent transmission of diseases and infections for one of three sampled resident (Resident 8), who was observed on 5/20/2026 with a suction cannister (a medical receptacle used with suction machines to collect bodily fluids-such as mucus, and secretion) dated 5/18/2026 half-filled with cloudy secretions. This deficient practice can result in the suction cannister to harbor bacteria and/or virus (microscopic germs that can invade the body and cause infections) which potentially can get Resident 8 and negatively affect her quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included asthma (a condition that causes airways become swollen, narrow, and clogged with mucus),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light (consists of a button that, when pressed, sends a signal to the nursing station or a centralized system, alerting healthcare providers that assistance is required in the patient's room) was within reach for Three out of eight sampled residents (Residents 66, 83, and 54). This deficient practice has the potential to delay care and services to the residents and preventing a timely response to care needs. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 66 ' s admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included aphasia ( loss of language) and dysphagia ( difficulty with verbal communication) following cerebral infarction with hemiplegia(paralysis or weakness of one side of body) and hemiparesis ( weakness or inability to move on one side of body) affecting right dominant side. A review of Resident 66 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 04/18/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection control policy of two out of two sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 29) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 25, who had a wound infection and used a peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through the larger veins near the heart) to receive antibiotics (medicines that fight bacterial infections in people) was provided care using enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) (taking extra steps to prevent the spread of serious infections, like using gowns and gloves) by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 4 who failed to wear a gown. 2. Ensure a used glove was disposed of properly after each use and not placed on Resident 29 ' s blanket while Resident 29 laid in bed. This deficient practice had the potential to transmit and spread infection (a process when a microorganism, such as bacteria, fungi, or a virus, enters a person's body and causes harm) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for two of two sampled residents (Residents 89 and 32) by failing to ensure: Resident 89 was provided with a wall clock in the room, and Resident 32 ' s bedside table was in functional and working condition. These deficient practices had the potential to create an uncomfortable environment leading to Resident 89 verbalizing feelings of frustration and Resident 32 ' s personal items to be exposed. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 89's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 89 on 12/27/2024 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (characterized by paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness on one side of the body) affecting left non-dominant side, depression (a persistent feeling of sadness and a loss of interest or pleasure in activities, lasting for at least two weeks, that interferes with daily life) and anxiety disorder (A condition in which a person has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan (a treatment plan that focused on the needs and preferences of a resident or individual) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 94) Speech Therapy (ST, helped people who had trouble with speaking, understanding language, or swallowing). This deficient practice had the potential for a lack of individualized care and to affect the quality of services provided to Resident 94. Findings: A review of Resident 94 ' s admission Record (AR), indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a disease, disorder, or damage that affected the brain ' s structure or function), muscle weakness (decrease in muscle strength), and abnormalities of gait and mobility (a change to your walking pattern). A review of Resident 94 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/1/2025, indicated the resident ' s neurological status alert and oriented times four (A&Ox4, someone who was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan were revised for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 94) that included resident-specific interventions. This deficient practice had the potential to delay care and services that were specific to the residents ' needs. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Alzheimer ' s disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), fractures, and muscle wasting (weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle). A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/2/2024, indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 4/2/2025, indicated the resident has severely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the insulin order to manage the diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing ) of one of one sampled residents (Resident 79) was followed when Resident 79 ' s blood sugar was tested above 300 mg/dL, in accordance with the physician ' s order to notify the physician of the results. This deficient practice had the potential for facility staff to mismanage the Resident 79 ' s diabetes mellitus. Findings: During a review of Resident 79 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), and kidney failures (a condition in which the kidneys stop working and are not able to remove waste and extra water from the blood or keep body chemicals in balance). During a review of Resident 79 ' s care plan for diabetes mellitus, initiated on 3/4/2025, the care plan indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 84) who had a Foley catheter (a thin, flexible catheter used especially to drain urine from the bladder), received appropriate care when Resident 84 ' s Foley catheter was nonfunctioning and leaking. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an increased risk for urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system), increased pain and discomfort for Resident 84. Findings: A review of Resident 84 ' s admission Record (AR) indicated Resident 84 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis not limited to Retention of urine( a condition in which you are unable to empty all the urine from your bladder), and urinary tract infection with prostatic hyperplasia (Prostate gland enlargement ). A review of Resident 84 ' s History and Physical (H&P), Dated 04/25/2025 indicated resident 84 was alert and had no apparent neurological disease. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 7) who received dialysis (a life-sustaining treatment for people whose kidneys were not functioning properly, replacing their filtering function) had a post-dialysis weight documented on 5/3/2025 and 5/10/2025. This deficient practice had the potential for unidentified complications after dialysis such as fluid shifts or significant weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 7 ' s admission Record (AR),indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD, the kidneys have failed and could no longer perform their essential functions, requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant to survive), arteriovenous fistula (AV fistula, an abnormal connection between an artery and a vein, bypassing the normal capillary network), and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of Resident 7 ' s Dialysis Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 52), who was receiving Apixaban (anticoagulant medication used for the treatment of blood clots) was adequately monitored for signs and symptoms of bleeding. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 52 to not be adequately monitored leading to the worsening of Resident 52 ' s health condition.Findings: A review of Resident 52 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included Obstructive Pulmonary Embolism (a blood clot in the lung artery) and Atrial Fibrillation (an abnormal heartbeat). A review of Resident 52 ' s Minimum Data Set ( MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 04/22/2025, indicated Resident 52 was cognitively intact ( mentally alert, oriented, and capable of thinking clearly and making decisions) but required moderate assistance ( helper lifts, holds, or supports limbs) with tasks that include eating and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), having a history of dementia ( a Condition of brain that makes it hard for a person to make decisions , and think clearly), requiring 1:1 supervision (one staff member is assigned to stay with and closely monitor one specific person at all times) for safety was not left unsupervised by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fall on 3/13/2025, requiring transfer to the acute hospital for evaluation and had the potential for serious physical injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a Condition of brain that makes it hard for a person to make decisions , and think clearly), disorders of bone density and structure (fragile bones, more likely to break) and history of falling. During a review of Resident 1 '…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), to be readmitted back to the facility on the first available bed, in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure titled Bed-Holds and Return, and the California Standard admission Agreement for Skilled Nursing Facilities and Intermediate Care Facilities. Resident 1, was transferred from the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF 1) to GACH 1 on 2/04/2025 for further evaluation of Candida Auris (CRS) and was medically stable to be discharged back to the SNF 1 on 2/05/2025 but SNF 1 refused to readmit Resident 1 back to the facility. Resident 1 had to stay in the GACH for additional seven (7) days (from 2/05/2025 to 2/11/2025) and was discharged home on 2/12/2025 with home health. This deficient practice resulted to Resident 1 incurring extra seven days of unnecessary acute hospital stay at GACH 1, from 2/5/2025 to 2/12/2025. Findings, During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) from developing pressure injuries (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) by not providing the necessary treatment and services to prevent the formation of and promote healing of pressure injury in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 2 developing Deep Tissue Injuries (damage to the soft tissue and skin caused by pressure or shear forces) to the left and right heels and had the potential for complications that included pain, infection, tissue necrosis, delayed wound healing, and reduced mobility. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 2 on 5/27/2024 and readmitted Resident 2 on 11/23/2024 with diagnoses that included fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur(broken upper leg), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to participate in self-care as indicated in the resident's care plan titled ADL (activities of daily living) self – care promoting independence and autonomy for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice violated the residents ' rights to participate in his or her own care and had the potential to create emotional distress leading to loss of autonomy. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of Metabolic encephalopathy (a change in consciousness that can cause confusion, memory loss, and loss of consciousness). A review of the History and Physical report completed on July 20, 2024, indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Set Data (MDS – a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated October 17, 2024, indicated resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 2), who was assessed by the facility as a high risk for developing pressure ulcer (PU, a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence due to unrelieved prolong pressure in combination with shear) and was admitted without pressure ulcers received the necessary care and services to prevent PU as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. Resident 2 was observed with Stage 2 PU (a partial-thickness skin loss that appears as an open sore or blister) in the sacrococcyx (tailbone) that was not previously assessed and identified by the facility. This deficient practice placed the resident and other potentially high risk residents for PU to be at risk of developing pressure ulcer that could result in delayed treatment, infection, discomfort, poor healing, and deterioration of PU. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident received treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and the facility's policy and procedures on Fall Management Program, revised 3/13/2021 and Completion & Correction, revised 1/1/2012 for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 had appropriate footwear as indicated in the resident's care plan and on oxygen while ambulating as indicated in the physician's order, during the time of fall incident on 1/13/2024. 2. Perform neurological check monitoring immediately after the fall incident on 1/13/2024 as indicated in the facility's fall management protocol, to perform neurological checks at the ordered frequency every 15 minutes for one hour, then every 30 minutes for one hour, then every hour for 4 hours. 3. Ensure thorough assessment of Resident 1's Fall Risk Evaluation (FRV) on 11/26/2023, completion of post fall FRV and revision of care plan during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) ensuring care plan was revised following Covid 19 infection. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the provision of care for these affected residents. Finding: A review of the facility ' s policy and procedure titled COVID-19 infection, dated with the revision date of January 28th, 2022, indicated resident vital sign monitoring - Residents in the red area will have vital signs, blood pressure, pulse, respiration rate, temperature and oxygen saturation documented every four hours. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (inability to move affected body part) and hemiparesis (one sided weakness) following a cerebral infarction (stroke). A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical dated 06/23/2023, indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two outdoor refuse containers (a waste container that a person controls that includes dumpsters, trash cans, garbage pails, and plastic trash bags) was placed in covered garbage cans. This failure had the potential to attract insects and harbor rodents and pests in the refuse area that can cause a wide spread of diseases and affect the residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/24 at 9:05 AM, with Dietary Aide (DA) 2 at the facility's parking lot, the outdoor refuse container was observed with no secured lid covered. The open refuse container was one-third full, filled with several closed plastic bags of garbage and a foam plate with food items lying on top of the garbage bags. DA 2 stated the lid of the refuse container should be closed at all times. DA 2 stated she would report to the Maintenance Supervisor (MS). During an interview on 5/6/24 at 9:31 AM with the MS, the MS stated he was notified by the dietary staff that the lid of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the resident's rights of four (4) of eight (8) alert and oriented resident (23, 26, 31, and 58) who attended the Resident Council meeting (meeting held in the facility attended by the residents) reported they were not informed of the State Long Term Ombudsman program (a program consist of resident advocacy group that promotes resident's rights) and/or provided with the telephone numbers and/or email on how to contact the Ombudsman's office. This deficient practice had violated the resident's rights, and a potential not to receive residents' assistance from resident advocacy group should unresolved issues arise in the facility. Findings, On 5/8/24 at 11:43 AM, during the Resident Council meeting and resident group interview with eight alert and oriented residents that attended the meeting, four Residents (Residents 23, 26, 31, and 58) from the group stated they were not aware of what a State Long Term Ombudsman program does and how to contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide (DA) 1 washed her hands properly before touching the clean dishes after sorting the dirty dishes in a dish rack and pushing the dish rack into the dish washer. This deficient practice had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses (diseases are caused by eating food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites or chemical substances) to the residents. Findings: During an observation on 5/6/24 at 9 AM, DA 1 was wearing a pair of vinyl exam gloves while sorting the dirty dishes on the counter on the left side of the dishwasher. After DA 1 put the dirty dishes on the dish rack and push the dish rack into the dishwasher, DA 1 dipped her hands with the vinyl exam gloves on into a red bucket with clean solution in it. Then, DA 1 took her hands with the gloves on out of the red bucket and touched the clean dishes on a dish rack. DA 1 moved the clean dishes on the dish rack to the drying cart. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/24 at 9:01 AM with DA 1, DA 1 stated she washed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled Residents (Residents 89, 77, and 193) were informed and verbalized understanding of the concept of the proposed arbitration (solving disputes with a neutral third party instead of the court) and the Binding Arbitration Agreement (BAA, a binding agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not) before having Residents 89,77, and 193 signed and entered into a binding arbitration agreement. The deficient practice resulted in Residents 89, 77, and 193 unknowingly giving up their right to resolve any disputes with the facility through a court of law before a jury. Findings: During an interview on 5/9/2024 at 11:02 AM with admission Director (AD), AD stated she was responsible for explaining and obtaining the BAA to the residents upon admission. The AD stated if the BAA was signed by the resident, the BAA was effective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 288) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure by failing to ensure the call light (a device used by residents to signal his or her needs for assistance) was within reach. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 288 not able to call the facility staff to ask for help or assistance specially during emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 288's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 288 on 11/6/21 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a disorder of brain function that often impairs consciousness) and history of fall. During a review of Resident 288's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 3/28/24, indicated Resident 288 had severely impaired memory and cognition (ability to think and reason). The MDS indicated Resident 288 required setup or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a current copy of the resident's Advanced Healthcare Directive (AHCD, a legal document that provide instructions for medical care and only go into effect if you cannot communicate your own wishes) in the resident's medical record for one (1) of one (1) sampled residents (Resident 69). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 69 to not have her wishes met regarding life-sustaining treatment (any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical condition). Findings: A review of Resident 69's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/14/23 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD-occurs when a gradual loss of kidney function reaches an advanced state in which kidneys no longer work as they should to meet the body's needs), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body's blood sugar is too high), weakness, and depression (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stops a person doing normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 66's Record of admission indicated the resident originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of related symptoms associated with an ongoing decline of the brain and its abilities), pulmonary fibrosis (lung tissue becomes damaged and scarred), and disorder of kidney and ureter (organs that collects and drains out urine from the body). During a review of Resident 66's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) dated 2/3/2024 indicated cognitive skills (ability to make daily decisions) was intact. Resident 66 required partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with sit to stand and walk 10 feet, supervision or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and or contact guard assistance as resident completes activity) with persona hygiene and toileting hygiene. A review of Resident 66's History and Physical dated 5/2/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to address the resident's medical and physical needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 28), had a physician order to receive Amoxicillin-Pot Clavulanate (a medication used to treat bacterial infections) tablet and Tylenol (medication used for aches and pains) tablet for tooth infection and tooth pain on 5/6/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 28's quality of care and quality of life by not receiving the appropiate interventions for the dental care. Findings: A review of Resident 28's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area) with hemiplegia (paralysis that affects one side of your body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body) affecting the right side, dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a post fall intervention for one of two sampled residents (Resident 13) who was at high risk for fall, by not having a bed alarm (alarms to alert staff to respond quickly and intervene to assist the patient, thus preventing a fall) and bilateral floor mats (placed adjacent to the bed may prevent injury for those prone to rolling out of bed) placed as indicated in the resident's plan of care. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 13 to have a recurrent fall that could cause serious injury and compromise the resident's well being. Findings: A review of Resident 13's admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness, cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy (nerve compression in the neck, leading to pain, numbness, and weakness in specific areas), and anxiety disorder (feeling of unease, such…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from significant medication error by not omitting Carvedilol (medication used to treat high blood pressure) during medication pass observation for one of five (Resident 67) sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications of hypertension hypertension (high blood pressure) and lead to heart attack ( lack of blood flow to the heart), heart failure(failure of the heart to meet the body's demand) and stroke-poor blood flow to the brain results in cell death). Findings: On 5/8/24 at 9:01 AM, during a Medication Pass (Med Pass) observation, conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN 4) at Nursing Station 3, LVN 4 prepared and administered the following medications to Resident 67 orally (by mouth): 1. Colace 100 MG (milligrams - unit of measure) one capsule (for bowel management). 2. Lisinopril 40 MG one tablet (for hypertension). 3. Nifedipine ER Osmotic Release 30 MG one tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications and/or treatment supplies for one of one sampled residents (Resident 26) who was observed with opened tube of Fluocinonide (medication used to treat many skin disorders), opened tube of hydrocortisone (medication used to help relieve redness, itching, swelling, or other discomfort caused by skin condition), and unopened tube of Ketoconazole (used to treat fungal skin infection) in the wash basin on Resident 26's bedside table. These deficient practices had the potential for other residents to use medications that could cause cross contamination of infection and/ or consume by other residents with cognitive impairment that could be harmful to their wellbeing. Findings, During an initial facility tour with Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2), on 5/7/24 at 10:22 AM, three medications tubes were observed in the wash basin on top of Resident 26's bedside table: Fluocinonide (missing the cap), Hydrocortisone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 55) with history of weight loss was assessed and served food that the resident preferred. This failure had a potential to result in Residnet 55's continued or recurrent weight loss due to that could result in a decline in the resident's well being due to not receiving food items of her choices. Findings: A review of Resident 55's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/27/24 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body ' s blood sugar is too high) and protein-calorie malnutrition (a serious condition happens when a person ' s diet does not contain the right amount of nutrients), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 55's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS, a standard assessment tool that measures health status), dated, indicated Resident 55's cognitive level was cognitively intact (able to process information, remember and reason), needed supervision or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 288) who was receiving hospice care services (hospice care is a type of health care that focuses on the palliation of a terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spriritual needs at the end of life) collaborated with hospice agency on the resident's plan of care by ensuring the plan of care was in the resident's medical record binder. This deficient practice had he potential to result in a delay or lack of coordination in delivery of hospice care and services to Resident 288. Findings: During a review of Resident 288's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 288 on 11/6/21 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a disorder of brain function that often impairs consciousness) and fall. During a review of Resident 288's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 3/28/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility staffs implemented the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions (precautions to prevent spread of infection) to wear isolation gown when taking care of one of two sampled residents (Resident 55). Resident 55 was ordered by the physician to be placed on contact isolation (precautions steps that healthcare facility visitors and staff need to follow before going into a patient's room, used for patients with diseases caused by bacteria and virus that are spread through direct and indirect contact). This failure had a potential to result in the spread of infection to the facility's staffs and residents and could cause a decline in other residents' health. Findings: A review of Resident 55 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/27/24 with diagnoses that included Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection [MRSA, a staphylococcus bacteria (a type of germ) that is resistant to certain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 34) was provided with safe and comfortable environment by failing to ensure the resident's restroom had a functional toilet's handle. This failure resulted in Resident 34's feeling uncomfortable when manually flushing the toilet and lifting the toilet water tank lid by herself to manually flush the toilet, that could potentially cause accidents and injury to resident. Findings: A review of Resident 34's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/20/24 with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular diseases [a systemic disorder that involves the narrowing of peripheral blood vessels (vessels situated away from the heart or the brain)], type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when the body's blood sugar is too high), protein-calorie malnutrition (a serious condition happens when a person ' s diet does not contain the right amount of nutrients), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS, a standard assessment tool that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) who required one-to-one staff supervision (sitter) and monitoring of the placement of wander guard, to reflect the current interventions and assessment to meet the immediate needs of the resident. This deficient practice in establishing, documenting, and implementing the care and services to be provided to the resident has the potential to negatively affect the physical well-being of Resident 2 and could potentially place the resident at risk for harm or injury. Findings: A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but not limited to dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and cognitive communication deficit (cannot recognize everyday social cues, both verbal and non – verbal). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and Registered Nurse (RN) 1 implement the facility ' s policy and procedures titled Receiving Controlled Substances (controlled medications), by failing to: 1. Reconcile controlled drug records with valid orders and administration record to detect irregular controlled medications activities and identify inventory discrepancy that occurred after a resident had been discharged from the facility. The facility accepted a pharmacy delivery of Norco for Resident 1 after Resident 1 had been discharged from the facility. The facility did not have a record of the physician order that matched the aforementioned delivery. As a result, there was a loss of 38 tablets of Norco (hydromorphone-acetaminophen, a narcotic or controlled medications, a potent opioid to treat pain) 10-325 milligrams (mg, an unit to measure mass) for one (1) of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1) These deficient practices may have led to the loss or diversion of Resident 1 ' s controlled drug, Norco. Findings: On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent treatments and services were implemented to promote the healing and prevention of pressure ulcers (wound caused when an area of skin is placed under pressure) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). 1. The facility did not update Resident 1's pressure ulcer treatment order as recommended by Medical Doctor (MD) 2. The facility did not create a care plan for Resident 1 ' s Stage 4 (deep wounds that may impact muscle, tendons, ligaments, and bone) pressure ulcer. 3. The facility did not completely document Residents 1's pressure ulcer treatments provided ,as indicated on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) from January 2023 to March 2023. These deficient practices had the potential for delayed healing of pressure ulcers and the potential detrorioration of Resident 1's Sacro-coccyx (middle of the buttocks) Stage 2 (affecting the top layer of the skin, with some loss of skin) pressure ulcer to Stage 4 pressure ulcer.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) who was identified as high risk for falls. 1. The facility did not place Resident 1 (R 1) close to the nurse ' s station after R1 ' s sustained a fall on 2/20/2024 with a nasal fracture. 2. The facility did not follow fall care plan goal for no fall related injury. 3. The facility did not follow fall care intervention for fall related injury. These deficient practices resulted in R1 falling on 1/25/2024/, 2/16/2024 and sustaining a nasal fracture after falling on 2/20/2024. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction (also know as a stroke which refers to damage to tissue in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area) and a history of falls (to drop or descend under the force of gravity, as to a lower place through loss or lack of support). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraints, when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 placed both bed side rails up and dressers on both sides of the bed to prevent one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from getting out of bed, without a physician ' s order and on-going assessments, in accordance with the facility policy and procedure on Bed Rails and Restraints. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 for accidents due to the use of bed side rails and dressers on both sides of the bed, without physician orders and ongoing assessment. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/21/23, with diagnoses that included but not limited to Alzheimer ' s Disease. (A brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks. A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility staff failed to implement the facility's policy and procedure, titled Abuse - Reporting and Investigations, by identifying, protecting, reporting, and initiating an investigation immediately from a suspected abuse allegation brought up by a resident's family member (FAM 1) to facility staff on 11/23/2023, 11/24/2023, and 11/25/2023, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Identify an allegation of abuse against CNA 1 by Resident 1, when FAM 1 reported on 11/23/2023 to a night shift (11 p.m. to 7 a.m.) facility staff (unable to recall clear staff name), on 11/24/2023 to LVN 1 during the dayshift (7 a.m. to 3 p.m.), and again on 11/25/2023 to LVN 1 during the dayshift (7 a.m. to 3 p.m.), and on 11/25/2023 to CNA 2 during the evening shift (3 p.m. to 11 p.m. shift). 2. Protect Resident 1 from a suspected abuse when CNA 1 continued to work throughout the 11 a.m. to 7 a.m. shift, on 11/23/2023, after FAM 1 reported the abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident abuse for one of one resident (Resident 1) to the Department, Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration), and to the local law enforcement, within two hours. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be at risk of further abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 11/03/2023, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including depression (feelings of hopelessness, sadness, and a general disinterest in life, which for the most part have no cause and may be the result of a psychiatric illness), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain) affecting left dominant side.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise and implement the resident's care plan with accurate and updated information regarding allergies and allergic reactions for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) with documented food/drug allergies. This deficient practice had the potential to delay care and service provided to the residents. Findings: A review of Resident 4 ' s Face Sheet (a document that gives a patient ' s information at a quick glance) indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunctions due to problems with your metabolism), mycosis(Any disease caused by a fungus that invades the tissue can cause a disease that's confined to the skin, spreads into tissue, bones, and organs, or affects the whole body) A review of Resident 4 ' s History and Physical Assessment, dated 1/15/2024 indicated Resident 4 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 4 ' s Allergy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation practice, when two (2) of 2 staff were observed wearing a watch and bracelets in the kitchen. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (an illness caused by contaminated food and beverages) to 93 of 96 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During an observation of the [NAME] 2 ' s (Cook 2) chopping of vegetables and Dietary Aide 1 (DA 1) portioning of milk on 1/18/2024 at 12:42 PM in the preparation area inside the facility's kitchen, [NAME] 2 was wearing a gold bracelet on her left arm while chopping vegetables and DA 1 was wearing a wristwatch and a metal bracelet while portioning milk in its individual cups. During a concurrent observation of [NAME] 2 and DA 1's food preparation on 1/18/2024 at 12:45 PM, and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the room space were at a minimum of 80 square feet (Sq. Ft.- a unit of measurement) for two out of 42 residents rooms (Rooms A & B). The two resident rooms consisted of two beds each room. Room A was occupied by Resident 65. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the quality-of-care and the ability of the nursing care to safely provide care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 5/13/2025 at 9:34 AM, the ADM stated Room A and B do not have the required 80 square feet per resident. The ADM added the facility would like to continue to apply for the room waiver for the 2 rooms. During a review of the facility ' s Client Accommodation Analysis (CAA), dated 5/13/2025, indicated Room A and B each have 2 beds. The CAA indicated both rooms have a floor area of 156 square feet, which is equal to 78 square feet per resident. During a review of the Facility's Client Accommodations Analysis form date 5/13/2025, indicated the facility had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the room space were at a minimum of 80 square feet (Sq. Ft.- a unit of measurement) for 2 out of 42 residents rooms (Rooms 25 & 26). The two resident rooms consisted of two beds each. room [ROOM NUMBER] was not occupied by a resident and room [ROOM NUMBER] was occupied by Resident 82. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the quality-of-care and the ability of the nursing care to safely provide care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 5/7/2024 at 8:15 AM, he stated multiple rooms in the facility did not have the required 80 square feet of space per resident, but the facility has a room waiver (a permit approved by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for rooms that did not meet the regulation requirement) in place and will request an additional waiver for this year. The ADM stated the room size had no impact on care of the residents. The ADM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$99,206 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $99,206 — penalty dated 2023-12-07
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-05 for 40 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/20/2025 |
| BASSUK, PABLO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2016 |
| GUZMAN, JAYSON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| G4 WELLNESS GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2012 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2012 |
| WEISS, JONATHAN | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/2012 |
| ERETZ YORK PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055664. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.