No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bay Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP

5901 Downey Ave, Long Beach, CA 90805 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (562) 634-4693 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$33,030 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $33,030 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-04)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3650 South St · (562) 634-1254 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3705 E South St · (424) 296-6532 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3400 E South St · (562) 529-5658 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.0%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.7%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.5%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.5%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.9%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.1%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.0%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.512.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.281.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.0%CMS range 27.9–60.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.6–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.4–14.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.521.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 64.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-26)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2021-07-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the plan of care to keep blood sugar levels in control with stable numbers for one of one resident (Resident 45), who was diagnosed with diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels) by failing to: a. Follow the physician's orders to notify the physician when Resident 45 blood sugar levels were 400 mg/dL or greater (normal blood sugar level is between 70 130 milligram/deciliter [mg/dL]). This failure resulted in the physician not notified when Resident 45's blood sugar levels reached 400 mg/dL and above per the sliding scale (the dose of insulin (Lispro, medication given to lower blood sugar level), to be given depending on the blood sugar results) for total of 16 times in May 2021, 15 times in June 2021, and 20 times in July 2021 . b. Follow the plan of care to monitor signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar level can cause symptoms such as increased thirst, frequent urination, fatigue, and nausea) and initiate the change of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2021-07-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address the Pharmacist Consultant (PC) irregularities and recommendations found on 5/2021 and 6/2021 during the Medication Regimen Review ([MRR] a review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify potential problems) for one of 15 residents (Resident 45). Resident 45, who was diabetic (abnormal blood sugar levels), experienced 48 instances of high blood sugar levels greater than 400 milligram/deciliter ([mg/dL] Normal Reference Range [NRR] from 70-130 mg/dL), which the PC recommended to report to the physician to adjust drug therapy, were not addressed by the attending physician and the Director of Nursing (DON), to ensure the irregularities were acted upon. These deficient practices placed Resident 45 at higher risk for diabetic ketoacidosis (condition where the body does not get the sugar it needs for energy, so the body begins to burn fat for energy) leading to long term complications such as damage to blood vessels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who had a history of banging her head on the wall, did not banged her head on the wall and sustained an injury for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, who was assigned to provide Resident 1 with 1:1 (a constant observation provided by a care giver/sitter) supervision for safety, prevented Resident 1 from walking towards the wall and start banging her head on the wall. 2. Ensure CNA 1 was informed and had knowledge of Resident 1's behavior of banging her head on the wall. 3. Ensure the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Safety, dated 4/15/25, which indicated, the purpose is to provide a safe and hazard free environment was followed. These failures resulted in Resident 1 banging her head on the wall and falling on the floor sustaining laceration (a deep cut or tear in the skin) on the left forehead (the left [NAME] of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) was not physically assaulted by another resident (Resident 2). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a laceration (a deep, jagged tear or cut in the skin, often caused by a sharp object or blunt trauma, resulting in an irregular wound that could bleed significantly) to his right hand between his right thumb and right pointer finger, that required eight sutures (a stitch or row of stitches holding together the edges of a wound or surgical incision) and abrasions (a minor injury to the skin that occurs when the skin is rubbed or scraped) to his right forearm, right knee and left knee. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder that occurs when there is a chemical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was not subjected to a physical abuse by Resident 2. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1, who had a history of aggressive behavior toward residents and staff and was sent out to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on 5150 (temporary, involuntary psychiatric commitment of residents who present a danger to themselves or others due to signs of mental illness) hold on 4/18/2024, was not placed in the same room with Resident 2 upon re-admission to the facility on 4/26/2024. 2. Ensure staff followed Resident 2's care plan titled, Alleged altercation per another roommate on 4/11/2024, to prevent Resident 2 altercations with Resident 1 on 4/27/2024. 3. Provide Resident 2 with 1:1 sitter (constant observation by a staff member for the residents and companions safety) to prevent Resident 2 from altercation with other residents per care plan titled, Alleged altercation per another roommate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) whose Responsible Party (RP) 1 verbalized a complaint to facility staff, was informed of and helped in completing a Grievance/Complaint Investigation Report. This failure resulted in Resident 1 and RP 1 not receiving timely or formal communication regarding the outcome or resolution of the complaint, which led to distrust toward the facility. This failure had the potential to delay necessary care and services to Resident 1 and could negatively impact Resident 1's mental health and emotional well being.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included hepatic encephalopathy (a decline in brain function which occurs when the liver cannot remove toxins from the blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had recommendations to have referrals and/or consultations with the cardiologist (medical doctor specializing in diseases of the heart) and neurologist (medical doctor specializing in diseases of the brain, spinal cord, nerves and muscles), were implemented. These failures resulted in Resident 1's referrals being delayed for more than nine months. These failures also had the potential to delay necessary specialty assessments, interrupted continuity of care, and increased the risk that changes in Resident 1's medical condition would go unrecognized which could affect Resident 1's health, safety, and overall, well being.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included hepatic encephalopathy (a decline in brain function which occurs when the liver cannot remove toxins…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA 1) accurately documented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), indicating Resident 1 received RNA services when there was no order and when those services were not provided. This deficient practice resulted in RNA 1 documenting Resident 1 was provided passive range of motion ([PROM] the movement of a joint when an outside force, such as a person or machine, moves the body part while the person is relaxed) exercises, to her bilateral lower ([BL] both legs) and bilateral upper extremities ([BLE] both upper arms), a splint (a rigid material or apparatus used to support in impaired joint) was applied to his right knee, and pressure relief ankle foot orthosis boot ([PRAFO] a specialized orthopedic boot designed to position the foot and ankle correctly, relieve pressure on the heel, and prevent complications such as pressure ulcers and contractures [permanent and painful tightening of the muscles that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Registered nurse (RN) worked eight consecutive hours a day seven days a week on 2/1/25, 2/2/25, 2/8/25, 2/9/25, 2/15/25, 2/23/25, 3/9/25 and 3/23/25. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' quality of care and not be able to provide advanced care activities such as resident assessments, developing and evaluating care plans, and consulting with physicians. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/25/25 at 4:08 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The facility's Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) dated 1/1/2025 through 6/24/25 were reviewed. The DHPPD indicated on 2/1/25, 2/2/25, 2/8/25, 2/9/25, 2/15/25, 2/23/25, 3/9/25 and 3/23/25 there was no RN coverage on those days. The DSD stated there needs to be an RN in case of an emergency because the RN has more knowledge in assessing the residents. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/25/25 at 4:08 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia( a pattern of behavior where a person feels distrustful and suspicious of other people and acts accordingly), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type(a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior) depression( a serious mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities, impacting how a person feels, thinks and handles daily tasks), and anxiety disorder (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). During a review of Resident 38's History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/8/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 38 can make needs known but cannot make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident screening tool) dated 4/30/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 38 had severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices when the facility failed to: 1.Ensure an open bag of frozen salisbury steak was stored in a sealed plastic bag in the freezer. 2.Ensure an open box of hot rice cereal was dated, labeled and stored in a sealed bag or container. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to food borne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins ). Findings: During an initial kitchen observation and interview on 6/23/2025, at 8:11 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM),observed an open plastic bag of frozen salisbury steaks in an open carton box was stored in the freezer. Observed DM took another plastic bag , placed the frozen salisbury steak in the plastic bag and returned the frozen steaks in the freezer. Observed an open box of rice hot cereal sitting on the kitchen countertop without an open date label.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee ([QAA] develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies) and the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] a group who takes a systemic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents and families) failed to ensure effective oversight of the facility and implementation of the facility's plan of correction (POC) of the deficient practices identified during the previous recertification survey. This failure resulted in the facility having repeat deficiencies in the areas of activities of daily living care provided for dependent residents, formulating advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate), infection prevention, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, food storage, free of medication error rates of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate) were discussed and written information was provided to the residents and/or responsible parties for two of six sampled residents (Resident 2 and 16). These deficient practices violated the residents' and/or the representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate an advance directive and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality) and depression (a mental health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview , and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 21) was free of chemical restraints (use of medication to control a patient's behavior or restrict the patient's movement and not required to treat the medical symptom) by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 21 was provided non-pharmacological interventions (interventions that does not primarily use medicine ) before administering a as needed) (prn) psychotropic medication(any drugs that affects the brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). This failure put Resident 21 at risk for adverse reactions (unintended, harmful events attributed to the use of medication) due to unnecessary prolonged use of psychotropic medication. Findings: During a record review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 11) had a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) assessment done when diagnosed with a mental illness prior to admission. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 22 and Resident 11 not receiving the necessary services and appropriate psychiatric( relating to mental illness or its treatment) level of treatment and evaluation in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) paranoid schizophrenia(a mental illness that is characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents' (Resident 2) was provided with personal hygiene care. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2's facial hair being too long to shave with a razor, requiring the use of an electrical razor and had the potential to affect Resident 2's dignity. Findings: During an observation on 6/23/2025 at 10:27 a.m., in the hallway outside of Resident 2's room, Resident 2 was observed with long unkempt facial hair. Resident 2 was observed asking the staff to shave him. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality) and depression (a mental health condition that causes persistent sadness and loss of interest in activities that were once enjoyable). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 60) were provided with a bowel and bladder retraining and/or toileting program (scheduled toileting, prompted voiding or bladder training [help to regain at least some control over patient's bladder]), to regain normal bowel and bladder function as much as possible and received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence. This failure had a potential risk for Resident 11 and Resident 60 to lose their ability to regain control of bowel and bladder function, which could result in loss of dignity. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) acute cystitis (a sudden inflammation of the urinary bladder caused by a bacterial infection),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 48) received respiratory care (specialized healthcare field that focuses on the treatment , management and prevention of respiratory disorders) consistent with professional standards of care by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 48 's nasal cannula (medical device used to deliver supplemental oxygen to a person's nose) was not left on the floor and oxygen concentrator ( medical device that provides a concentrated source of oxygen) were turned off when not in use. These failures had the potential to put Resident 48 for respiratory infection (an infection that affects respiratory tract which includes the nose, throat, and lungs caused by viruses or bacteria). Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 48 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependence on supplemental oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview , and record review , the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral care and treatment on one of three sample residents ( Resident 167) by failing to: 1.Assess and monitor Resident 167's behavior after verbalization of wanting to die. 2.Follow up physician's notification about Resident's 167 suicidal ideation (thoughts of self-harm or ending one's life). 3.Provide psychiatric (study and treatment of mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders ) evaluation after Resident 167's verbalization of wanting to die. These failures had the potential to put Resident 167 at risk of committing suicide due to delays in care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident167's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia partial ( paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, diabetes mellitus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% (percent) during medication pass for one of the four sampled residents (Residents 46 ) The facility failed to: a. Administer Resident 46's Onglyza (medication for DM), Sitagliptin (medication for DM) and Risperdal (antipsychotic medication [used to treat schizophrenia and bi-polar]) within 60 minutes of its scheduled time as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration dated 1/1/2012. These deficient practices of medication administration error rate of 9.09% exceeded the five (5) percent threshold. Findings: During a review of Resident 46 admission Record, dated 6/25/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental illness that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 46) was free from significant medication errors by failing to administer Onglyza for diabetes mellitus 2 (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), Sitagliptin for DM 2 and Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) used to treat schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) as prescribed by the physician. These failures had the potential to place Resident 46 at risk for hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and angry outbursts. Findings: During a review of Resident 46 admission Record, dated 6/25/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (set of infection control measures designed to prevent the spread of infectious diseases in healthcare settings) were implemented for one of one sampled resident (Resident 22) who had an order to rule out Clostridium difficile (C. diff- a highly contagious bacteria that causes severe diarrhea) due to frequent diarrhea. This failure had the potential to expose other residents, staff and visitors to the spread of infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) paranoid schizophrenia(a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), major depressive disorder(a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who had anxiety (an emotional state that involves feelings of fear, dread and uneasiness), and had Ativan (a medication used to treat anxiety) 1 milligram ([mg] a unit of measurement) to control their anxiety, was provided antianxiety medication, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure licensed nurses ordered a refill of Ativan 1 mg for Resident 1 ' s anxiety before the medication ' s quantity was depleted. 2. Ensure Resident 1 received Ativan for anxiety, as ordered by Resident 1 ' s physician. 3. Ensure licensed nurses contacted Resident 1 ' s MD 1 to obtain authorization to access the facility ' s emergency kit ([E-Kit] a kit which contains a small quantity of medications which can be dispensed when pharmacy services are not available) containing Ativan 1 mg to administer to Resident 1. 4. Ensure the licensed nurses followed the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who lacked the capacity to make decisions, was supervised, and monitored to prevent one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from eloping (leaving a secured institution without notice or permission) from the facility. Resident 1 was last seen in the facility on 12/12/2024 at approximately 10:30 p.m in his room. Resident 1 was noted missing on 12/12/2024 at approximately 11:30 p.m. As of 12/20/2024, Resident 1 has not been located. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 ' s eloping from the facility on 12/12/2024 and his whereabouts being unknown. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to be exposed to excessive drops in temperature, motor vehicle accidents, hunger, dehydration, and death. Findings During a review of Resident 1 ' s General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) records dated 8/19/2024, the GACH records indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the GACH on 8/9/2024 for aggressive behavior and was put on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident rights to be free from physical abuse for two of six sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) separated Resident 1 and Resident 2 immediately when the two residents were arguing over a wheelchair which resulted to Resident 1 throwing a coffee cup to Resident 2's right side of the head. Resident 1 had a recent history of resident-to-resident altercation last June 2024 and Resident 2 had a known aggressive behavior against staff and residents. 2. Protect and prevent Resident 3 from hitting Resident 4 on the face. These failures resulted in Resident 2 sustained a skin abrasion (superficial skin wound) on the right side of the head and Resident 4 getting hit on the face and fell on the floor. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 documented medication as administered in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) immediately after administering Resident 20's Insulin Lispro (a short acting medication used to treat elevated blood sugar level). 2. Ensure LVN 5 verified Resident 20's identity with the MAR prior to medication administration. These deficient practices increased the risk of medication error, including Resident 20 not receiving the correct medication as ordered. 3. Ensure LVN 5 and LVN 2 performed a change of shift inventory of controlled medication (a term used for medications with high level of abuse and dependence) and documented on the count on the facility's-controlled drug count record (a document indicating perpetual inventory and administration of controlled substances) at the beginning and end of each shift per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Controlled Medication Storage. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1. Dusty fan was located near the dishwasher and a dusty radio was located near the kitchen prep table (workstation for food preparation). 2. Facility freezer and refrigerator were not in safe operating condition. 3. A green substance was observed on the spout of the ice dispenser These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (illnesses contracted from eating contaminated food or beverages) of residents who received food from the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/28/2024 at 3:12 p.m., of the facility's kitchen, a dietary staff was unloading the newly sanitized dishes from the dishwasher and a dusty fan was situated over the dishwasher equipment blowing air to the newly sanitized dishes. Observed a dusty radio was placed close to the kitchen prep table. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices was implemented. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure personal protective equipment (PPE- equipment used to prevent or minimize exposure to hazards) was easily accessible for direct patient care staff on residents with Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- use of a gown and gloves for residents with wounds, and indwelling devices). These deficient practices had the potential for the spread and transmission of multidrug resistant organism (MDROs- microorganisms, predominantly bacteria that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) in the facility. 2. Ensure the facility's Water Management Plan (plan that identifies hazardous conditions and steps to take to minimize the growth and spread of bacteria[germs]) indicated testing protocols (deliberate action to see if something works) for control measures (actions taken to reduce the potential of exposure to the hazard) and documented results of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three freezers and one refrigerator in the facility's kitchen and food pantry were maintain in safe operating condition. This failure had the resident food items stored in an unsafe condition that could potentially place the residents at risk for food-borne illnesses (illness cause by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: During an observation on 6/28/2024 at 3:24 p.m., at the facility's food pantry with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the following were observed: a. Freezer #1 that stored several bags of frozen tortilla have no thermometer to monitor the freezer's temperature. There was an opened bag of tortilla with no opened date tag and another tortilla bag unopened with ice crystals inside the bag. b. Freezer #2 that stored packed bags of vegetables had a temperature of 2 (two) degrees Fahrenheit (°F a temperature scale) and there was an ice build up observed on the upper portion of the freezer. c. Freezer #3 that stored sliced carrots and french fries had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving hemodialysis ([HD], a medical procedure to remove fluid and waste products from the body) provided necessary care and services for two of two sampled residents (Resident 47 and 26). The facility failed to: a. Ensure Resident 47's blood pressure check was not measured using the left arm with the arteriovenous shunt ([AV] a connection that was made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access). This deficient practice had the potential to interrupt the blood flow to the arm and may cause the AV shunt to stop working. b. Accurately measure Resident 47 and 26's intake and output when a full pitcher of water was left and within reach for Resident 47 and Resident 26. This deficient practice had the potential to cause fluid overload (too much water in the body) for Resident 47 and Resident 26. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 47's admission record, the admission Record indicated Resident 47 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent (process by which a healthcare provider educates a resident about the risks and benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention) prior to the administration of psychotropic drugs (medication that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior) for two of four sampled residents (Resident 64 and Resident 41). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 64 and 41 at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication including Lorazepam (brand name Ativan-medication used to treat anxiety [feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness], Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication that can treat several mental health conditions) and lithium carbonate (a medication used to treat manic episodes of bipolar disorder) and Resident 41 receiving olanzapine, and Ativan without clinical justification for use. Findings: a.During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Two medication errors out of 27 opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 7.14 % affecting one of four residents observed (Resident 33) during medication administration. The medication errors were as follows: 1. Calcitonin Salmon Nasal Solution (a medication used to treat osteoporosis [a disease which causes bones to weaken and break more easily]) 200 units ([U] the amount of a medication administered to a resident in a single dose) one spray was administered in Resident 33's right nostril (outer openings of the nose through which one breathes) instead of left nostrils as ordered by Resident 33 physician. 2. Omission of Calcitonin Salmon Nasal Solution 200 U one spray in Resident 33's left nostril. These deficient practices resulted in failing to administer Calcitonin Salmon Nasal Solution in accordance with the physician's orders and increased the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance committee ([QAA] a group of facility staff who identifies, evaluates, and implements measures to improve the quality of care and life for the residents in the facility) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] a group who takes a systemic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents and families, and all nursing home caregivers in practical and creative problem solving) committee failed to ensure continued oversight of the facility's plan of correction (POC) of the deficient practices identified during the previous recertification survey (7/19/2021). This deficient practice resulted in the facility having repeat deficiencies in quality of care, such as pharmaceutical services (procuring, dispensing, distributing, storing, and administering of medications), medication error rate of five percent or more, infection control, and physical environment. Findings: During a review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 38) who had a history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental health condition that triggered by a terrifying event either experiencing it or witnessing it), and depression (a depressed mood or loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time) was provided individualized plan of care to address potential trauma triggers This deficient practice has the potential not to provide resident centered behavioral health care services needed for Resident 38. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs and lows), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 27), who was prescribed with antipsychotic drug (a type of medication prescribed to treat mental health problem) and an anxiolytic drug (anti-anxiety medications, that treat anxiety symptoms and disorders) were monitored for behaviors of bipolar (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings) and anxiety episodes every shift. This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 27's behavior of psychosis and anxiety to be unmonitored and has the potential for an inaccurate information necessary for gradual dose reduction ([GDR] tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued. and/ or readjustment) of Resident 27 psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-30 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 30) Responsible Party (RP) was notified when the dentist recommended the need for dentures (an artificial placement of one or more teeth). This deficient practice had the potential to cause a delay in dental treatment for Resident 30. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (damage or disease which affects the brain), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease which destroys memory and other important mental functions), and unspecified dementia (loss of cognitive functioning [thinking, remembering, and reasoning]). During a review of Resident 30's History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/1/2024, indicated Resident 30 did not have the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 30's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 30 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the California Department of Health (CDPH) Licensing and Certification Program (L&C), State Long Term Care Ombudsman ([LTC] public advocate) and the local Police Department (PD) within the regulated time frame of two hours for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in a delay in the investigation of the sexual abuse allegation and had the potential for pertinent data to be lost and/or forgotten. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Parkinsonism (brain condition which causes slowed movements, rigidity [stiffness] and tremors), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions which interferes with doing everyday activities), schizophrenia (a mental health condition which causes hallucinations [when a person hears, sees, smells, tastes or feels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete one of one resident's (Resident 1) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASRR] a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care), when Resident 1 was newly diagnosed with Schizophrenia (mental disorder affecting thoughts and perceptions) and started on Risperdal (medication used to treat Schizophrenia). This deficient practice has the potential to result in a lack of specialized care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's the admission Record (face sheet-FS), the FS indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis (severe infection), pneumonia (infection that affects one or both lungs), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-group of diseases that cause breathing problems) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H/P), dated 2/27/2023, the H/P indicated Resident 1 has the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT) was involved in developing a discharge plan for one of three sample residents (Resident 1), that reflects Resident 1's discharge concerns, needs, goals and treatment preferences. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 feeling angry and distrustful of the staff and the failures had the potential to result in an ineffective discharge planning leading to lack of necessary care and services for Resident 1 after discharge. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's the admission Record (face sheet-FS), the FS indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis (severe infection), pneumonia (infection that affects one or both lungs), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-group of diseases that cause breathing problems) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care-screening tool, dated 9/4/2023, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately transfer one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH), when Resident 1, whose medical history included a stroke (occurs when something blocks blood supply to part of the brain or when a blood vessel in the brain bursts causing damage to the brain), was observed following an unwitnessed fall on 7/21/2023 at 1:30 p.m., with right sided facial drooping (when facial muscles are not aligned), drooling from the right side his mouth, and slurred speech, which were significant signs and symptoms (s/s) of a cerebrovascular accident ([CVA] a stroke) but was not transferred to the GACH until 5:16 p.m. (7/21/2023), 3 hours and 45 minutes after being observed with stroke like s/s. This deficient practice resulted in a delay in Resident 1's evaluation and treatment and the inability for Resident 1 to receive a tissue plasminogen activator ([tPA] a medication used to dissolve intravascular [pertaining to anything…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee /Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee (entity responsible for identifying and responding to quality deficiencies in the nursing home) failed to identify internal systemic issues related to the following: 1. Diabetic management (system of coordinated health care interventions for residents with diabetes[disease that occurs when blood glucose is too high])) for 15 out of 15 residents by: a. Not notifying the physicians for blood glucose (type of sugar in the blood) results of greater than 400 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). (normal blood glucose level for diabetic is between 70-130 mg/dl before meals), b. Not monitoring signs and symptoms after residents had blood glucose greater than 400 mg/dL, and c. Not re-checking the blood glucose after administering insulin (medication that lowers the blood glucose ) for results greater than 400 mg/dL. 2. Medication regimen review (process in which the licensed pharmacist reviews all the medications the residents are currently taking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the freezer temperature was maintained within safe operating conditions on or below 0 degrees Farenheit (F). This failure had the potential to cause food borne illness due to improper temperatures to prevent bacterial growth. Findings: During an observation of the kitchen on 7/13/21 at 8:25 a.m., the reach-in freezer thermometer was observed to have a temperature of 10 degrees Farenheit (F). At 9:34 a.m. the freezer temperature was observed to be at the same temperature at 10 degrees F. During an interview with the dietary supervisor (DS) the freezer was constantly being opened as the reason for the high temperature. The contents of the freezer included frozen sorbet in cups, frozen assorted cooked meat, frozen hot dogs and frozen tater tots. All items were cold and solid hard to the touch. During an interview on 7/13/21 at 4:40 p.m. the DS stated she will move the frozen items to the spare freezer in the basement. During a concurrent observation, the kitchen staff were obsereved moving items from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident 41 had a bedside commode (a piece of furniture containing a concealed chamber pot) or toilet riser to assist resident with toileting. This deficient practice had the potential not to meet Resident 41's needs in toileting and promote independence and safety. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 41's diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur (broken left hip), respiratory failure with hypoxia (absence of enough oxygen), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive disease that makes it hard to breath). During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS), assessment and care-planning tool, dated 6/18/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 41 had no cognitive (ability to learn remember, understand and decisions) impairment for daily decision making. The MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the plan of care to keep blood sugar levels in control with stable numbers for one of one resident (Resident 45), who was diagnosed with diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels) by failing to: Follow the physician's orders to notify the physician when Resident 45 blood sugar levels were 400 mg/dL or greater (normal blood sugar level is between 70 130 milligram/deciliter [mg/dL]). This failure resulted in the physician not notified when Resident 45's blood sugar levels reached 400 mg/dL and above per the sliding scale (the dose of insulin (Lispro, medication given to lower blood sugar level), to be given depending on the blood sugar results) for total of 16 times in May 2021, 15 times in June 2021, and 20 times in July 2021 . Findings: During a record review of Resident 45's admission Record, face sheet (document gives resident quick information briefly), indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 45's diagnoses included type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement repositioning care plan interventions for two of three residents (Residents 23 and 36). This deficient practice had the potential for formation of pressure sores (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) to Residents 23 and 36. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/13/2021, at 9:10 a.m., Resident 23 stated the nursing staff did not reposition her every two hours and she was only reposition a few times per week. Resident 23 stated she was able to pull herself up with the trapeze (a medical trapeze hangs over the bed to function as a grab bar, providing leverage for patients with upper body strength to position themselves without help), but was not able to turn from left to right without help. Resident 23 stated sometimes her buttocks (tail bone) was sore. Resident 23 stated nursing staff does not offer to turn me throughout the day. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. During an interview on 7/14/21 at 10:14 a.m., Resident 13 stated curtains are left open during incontinence care by different staff members. The resident stated, I feel ashamed because everyone can see my body. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/19/21, at 10:15 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 9) inside Resident 13's room, LVN 9 was observed exposing genital area while assessing the resident's indwelling catheter (Foley catheter) with the privacy curtain partially opened. During a consequent interview with LVN 9, she stated she did not provide privacy to the resident by not pulling the curtain fully around the resident's bed. LVN 9 stated the facility policy was to always provide privacy because it is their right, for dignity, and respect. During an interview on 7/19/21 at 11:29 a.m., the Director of Staff Development/ Infection Preventionist (DSD/IP) stated, while providing incontinence care, staff are educated to knock, introduce themselves, and let the resident's know what they are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medication was available for Resident 44 2. Ensure controlled medications were entered into the disposition logbook for Residents 15, 57, and 38. These deficient practices increased the risk that medications may not be available for Resident 44 when needed and had the risk for the potential loss, diversion (transfer of a medication from a legal to an illegal use), or accidental exposure to controlled substances. Findings: a. A review of Resident 44's Facesheet (admission record) indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis not limited to diabetes type 2 (abnormal blood sugar), gastroesophageal reflux disease ([GERD] reflux of the stomach contents into the esophagus), thrombocytopenia (an abnormal drop of blood cells involved in forming blood clots in the blood), and dementia (memory loss). A review of quarterly Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 6/11/2021,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free of medication error rate of less than five percent, as evidenced by the identification of two (2) medication errors out of twenty-seven (27) opportunities for error, to yield a cumulative error rate of 7.41 percent for two of four sampled residents (Residents 35 and 44). 1. Failed to ensure administration of the correct dose of Vitamin C given to Resident 35. 2. Failed to have Pyridoxine (Vitamin B6) available to ensure Resident 44 received the medication per physician order. These deficient practices had resulted in Resident 35 and Resident 44 not receiving their medications as ordered by the physician. Findings: a. A review of Resident 35's Facesheet (admission record) indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses not limited to hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body), diabetes type 2 (abnormal blood sugar), gastrostomy tube ([gtube]a tube that is placed directly into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, facility failed to: 1. Ensure an counter medications (OTC), had a date opened on the bottle for one Resident (213). 2. Ensure emergency kits (ekits)[storage receptacle that contains a drug supply that can be used for residents during emergencies] were replaced within 72 hours of access per facility policy. These deficient practices had the potential for harm for Resident 213 to receive ineffective, and expired medication, stored in the medication carts and the potential for unavailability of medication for the residents during an emergent situation. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 9:00 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, Resident 213's Vitamin D3 125 mcg 5000 IU 1-tab over the counter medication was observed opened but did not indicate a dated as to when it was opened. LVN 3 stated OTC medications are supposed to be dated with an open date. During an interview on [DATE], at 2:52 p.m., Registered Nursing Supervisor (RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-07-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use the correct portion size for pureed (paste or thick liquid suspension made from finely ground cooked food) chicken during lunch service for four of 4 residents (Resident 18, 31, 39 and 213) This deficient practice had the potential the residents on a pureed diet to receive less than the required amount of protein as indicated on the therapeutic diet menu (spreadsheet indicating all diet types). Findings: During a lunch tray observation on 7/13/21, starting at 12:00 p.m., Dietary [NAME] (Cook 1) was observed using a blue-colored number (#) 12 scooper (1/3 cup) of pureed chicken and gravy (protein) onto Resident 18, 31, 39 and 213's plate. During an interview and concurrent record review of the residents' therapuetic diet menus on 7/13/21 at 12:50 p.m., [NAME] 1 stated that each resident on a puree diet should get four ounces (1/2 cup) of puree chicken. [NAME] 1 stated it was important for the residents to receive the correct amount of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review facility failed to ensure : a. Competency for the laundry staff to maintain and use washing machines temperature in according to manufacturer's instruction. b. Infection control practices were maintained during incontinent care for Resident 23 c. Infection control practices were maintained for storing and cleaning of shower chairs This deficient practice had the potential for microbial contamination of soiled linens that can cause potential spread of infection for the residents, and spread of infections and communicable diseases due to non-adherence of infection control practices. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/15/2021 at 12:00 p.m., three laundry washers was observed in the laundry room Laundry Aide (LA) with stated she takes laundry from the laundry shoot and sorts them out into three bins. LA stated that the first washer temperature was at 170 degrees but did not know how to where to check the temperatures of the washers. LA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was provdied during assessment an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserte into the bladder to drain urine) for one of two residents (Resident 13). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 13 feeling embarassed. Findings: During an interview on [DATE] at 10:14 a.m., Resident 13 stated curtains are left open during incontinence care by different staff members. The resident stated, I feel ashamed because everyone can see my body. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 10:15 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 9) inside Resident 13's room, LVN 9 was observed exposing genital area while assessing the resident's indwelling catheter (Foley catheter) with the privacy curtain partially opened. During a consequent interview with LVN 9, she stated she did not provide privacy to the resident by not pulling the curtain fully around the resident's bed. LVN 9 stated the facility policy was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-19 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quarterly Minimum Data Set (a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening tool [MDS]) was completed within the required time frame for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the provision of necessary care and services for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Records (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included sepsis (blood poisoning by bacteria), pneumonia ( an infection of the lungs), encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction), type 2 diabetes (a condition that occurs when the body can't use glucose [a type of sugar] normally), and quadriplegia( paralysis caused by illness or injury that results in a partial or total loss of use of all their limbs and torso). During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) a resident assessment and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to change the or oxygen tubing for one of two residents (Resident 32) and to change a nebulizer mask (a drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) for one of two residents (Resident 51) based on facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential for respiratory infections for Resident 32 and 51. Findings: a. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure with hypoxia ( absence of enough oxygen), chronic pulmonary edema (excess fluid in the lung ), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive disease that makes it hard to breath), chronic systolic congestive heart failure condition in which the heart cannot pump enough blood). During a review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set (MDS), assessment and care-planning tool, dated 6/13/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 32 had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the fortified soup was prepared following the recipe for three of 3 residents (Resident 3,18 and 40). This deficient practice had the potential to result in diminished nutritive value of food served to the residents. Findings: a. A record review of Resident 18's face sheet (admission record) indicated Resident 18 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease (type of dementia affecting memory, thinking and behavior), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and adult failure to thrive. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 4/30/2021, indicated Resident 18 had moderately impaired cognitive skills (ability to think, read, learn, remember, reason, and pay attention) for daily decision making and staff supervision was required. A review of the physician orders dated 7/16/2021 indicated Resident 18 had an order for fortified soup with lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$33,030 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-04-04
  • $23,920 — penalty dated 2025-01-29
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-12 for 43 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Creek Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Coral Cove Post AcuteLong Beach, CA 1 of 5East Terrace Rehabilitation & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Four Seasons Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Hawthorne Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPHawthorne, CA 1 of 5Los Feliz Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Mar Vista Country Villa Healthcare & WellnessLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Oakwood Healthcare CenterChico, CA 1 of 5Pioneers Memorial Skilled Nursing CenterBrawley, CA 1 of 5Plaza Healthcare CenterSanta Ana, CA 2 of 5Anaheim PointAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Chico Terrace Care CenterChico, CA 2 of 5Claremont Heights Post AcuteClaremont, CA 2 of 5Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Fortuna Rehabilitation And Wellness Center, LPFortuna, CA 2 of 5Granada Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Montecito Heights Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5Pasadena Park Healthcare And Wellness CenterPasadena, CA 2 of 5San Rafael Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPSan Rafael, CA 2 of 5Tulare Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPTulare, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post Acute CareLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5York Healthcare & Wellness CentreLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Alhambra Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPAlhambra, CA 3 of 5Bay Marina Post AcuteOakland, CA 3 of 5Monterey Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRosemead, CA 3 of 5Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPOntario, CA 3 of 5Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Pavilion On Pico Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Princeton Manor Healthcare Center, LLCOakland, CA 3 of 5Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 4 of 5Ivy Creek Healthcare & Wellness CentreSan Gabriel, CA 4 of 5Kings Healthcare & Wellness Center LPHanford, CA 4 of 5Pine Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPSan Gabriel, CA 4 of 5River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRedding, CA 4 of 5West Hollywood Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPVisalia, CA 5 of 5North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPFresno, CA 5 of 5Oxnard Manor Healthcare CenterOxnard, CA 5 of 5West Pico Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2014
LAZARO, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/09/2020
POLE, SHIVANANDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2020
BAY VISTA WELLNESS GP, LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/01/2014
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/01/2014
BAY VISTA-LET LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/15/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$600K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 14%Other / private 13%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $600K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$438per resident / day
operating cost
$13,319per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$369per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056042. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next