Bay Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP
5901 Downey Ave, Long Beach, CA 90805 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (562) 634-4693 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $33,030 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.1% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.51 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.28 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 83 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.0%CMS range 27.9–60.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 6.6–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 49.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.4–14.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.52 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 64.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who had a history of banging her head on the wall, did not banged her head on the wall and sustained an injury for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, who was assigned to provide Resident 1 with 1:1 (a constant observation provided by a care giver/sitter) supervision for safety, prevented Resident 1 from walking towards the wall and start banging her head on the wall. 2. Ensure CNA 1 was informed and had knowledge of Resident 1's behavior of banging her head on the wall. 3. Ensure the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Safety, dated 4/15/25, which indicated, the purpose is to provide a safe and hazard free environment was followed. These failures resulted in Resident 1 banging her head on the wall and falling on the floor sustaining laceration (a deep cut or tear in the skin) on the left forehead (the left [NAME] of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) was not physically assaulted by another resident (Resident 2). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a laceration (a deep, jagged tear or cut in the skin, often caused by a sharp object or blunt trauma, resulting in an irregular wound that could bleed significantly) to his right hand between his right thumb and right pointer finger, that required eight sutures (a stitch or row of stitches holding together the edges of a wound or surgical incision) and abrasions (a minor injury to the skin that occurs when the skin is rubbed or scraped) to his right forearm, right knee and left knee. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder that occurs when there is a chemical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was not subjected to a physical abuse by Resident 2. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1, who had a history of aggressive behavior toward residents and staff and was sent out to a general acute care hospital (GACH) on 5150 (temporary, involuntary psychiatric commitment of residents who present a danger to themselves or others due to signs of mental illness) hold on 4/18/2024, was not placed in the same room with Resident 2 upon re-admission to the facility on 4/26/2024. 2. Ensure staff followed Resident 2's care plan titled, Alleged altercation per another roommate on 4/11/2024, to prevent Resident 2 altercations with Resident 1 on 4/27/2024. 3. Provide Resident 2 with 1:1 sitter (constant observation by a staff member for the residents and companions safety) to prevent Resident 2 from altercation with other residents per care plan titled, Alleged altercation per another roommate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-07-16 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its Payroll Based Journal (a mandated reporting system used by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to collect auditable employee-level staffing data from long-term care facilities) was submitted for the first fiscal year quarter.This deficient practice resulted in the facility's failure to provide required information regarding staffing levels necessary to ensure the provision of safe and comprehensive care for all residents in accordance with federal regulations. Findings:During a review of the facility's PBJ Staffing Data Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 1 2026 (October 1 through December 31), the PBJ report indicated the facility failed to submit data for the fiscal year one quarter. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/14/2026 at 10:10 a.m., with the Administrator (ADMIN), CMS Submission Report for the PBJ validation report, dated 2/13/2026, was reviewed. The ADMIN stated the PBJ validation report indicated fiscal year quarter 2 was submitted instead of fiscal year 1 which covers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 12 sampled residents (Resident 5, 30 and 46) had completed Advance Directives ([AD]-written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) correctly in the medical records when:a. Failing to ensure Resident 5 had an AD acknowledgement form.b. Failing to ensure Resident 30 had an AD acknowledgement form.c. Failing to ensure Resident 46 had an advance directive acknowledgement form.These failures had the potential to result in care being provided that was inconsistent with the residents' wishes and could compromise the residents' rights to make decisions regarding their medical care during emergencies, end of life, and changes in condition.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/3/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to store and handle food in a sanitary manner to prevent growth of microorganisms that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food, pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or parasites that contaminate food, as well as toxins) for 61 out of the 70 residents in the facility by failing to ensure: 1.There were no pests in the storage room.2.The dry storage room temperature was not above the appropriate range of 50 Fahrenheit ( F, temperature scale) - 70 F 3.Frozen food items were dated and ensure and accurately labeled.4. Food items in the residents' refrigerator were dated, had resident identifiers, and a log of when the refrigerator was cleaned. 5. The kitchen staff performed proper hand hygiene in-between tasks. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:Ensure the padded bed side rails that were wrapped with porous foam were effectively disinfected for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 50).Complete the Infection Screening Evaluation form for one of five sampled residents (Resident 57), who was on the facility's Infection Prevention Surveillance Program for [DATE].These failures had the potential to increase the risk of cross-contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products) and spreading infection for Resident 1 and Resident 50, and negatively impact the treatment for Resident 57. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia a (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence that their ice machine was being serviced routinely to be maintained in a safe operating condition.This failure had the potential to result in a widespread foodborne illness with the residents.Findings:During an interview on 7/15/2026 at 2:34 p.m. with the Central Worker (CW), the CW stated there was no log documenting previous ice machine vendor service, however, a magnet attached to the ice machine displayed the most recent service date.During a concurrent observation and interview on review on 7/15/2026 at 2:40 p.m. with the CW in the staff breakroom, a magnet on the ice machine indicated that maintenance was required every three months and showed 5/27/2025 as the next scheduled service date. The CW stated the date on the magnet was incorrect.During an interview on 7/16/2026 at 8:57 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated the ice machine is serviced by an external vendor once a year.During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/16/2026 at 9:14 a.m. with the CW, Vendor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one sampled resident (Resident 5) was provided the opportunity to eat her meals at the same time as other residents during lunch at the dining room.This failure had the potential to diminish the resident's dignity, promote social isolation during mealtime, and result in an unsatisfactory dining experience. Findings: During a record review of Resident 5's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that impairs memory, thinking, and daily functioning), unspecified dementia (a decline in cognitive function affecting memory, reasoning, and the ability to perform activities of daily living), dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase (difficulty swallowing due to impaired movement of food from the mouth and throat to the esophagus), chronic kidney disease (progressive loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation,interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate skin care plan for Resident 16 with dermatitis (inflammation of the skin, commonly causing red, itchy, and swollen skin) to address the resident's skin care needs for one of 1 sampled resident (Resident 16).This failure had the potential to result in unidentified care and delayed medical intervention.Findings: During a record review of Resident 16's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dermatitis, unspecified (inflammation of the skin causing redness, itching, and irritation), other specified dermatitis (a specific type of skin inflammation not otherwise classified), impetigo, unspecified (a contagious bacterial skin infection characterized by sores and blisters), and non-bullous impetigo (the most common form of impetigo, causing crusted skin lesions without large fluid-filled blisters).During a record review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 4 received appropriate care when staff did not recognize and respond to:a) Resident 4's multiple episodes of loose stools while receiving Lactulose (a prescription laxative used to treat chronic constipation), and a physician's order to hold the medication for loose stools, for one of one sampled residents (Resident 4).b) Resident 3's change in condition following the initiation of anticoagulant therapy, without initiating a Change of Condition (COC), for one of one sampled residents (Resident 3).These failures have the potential to result in inconsistent care delivery, breakdowns in communication of resident specific interventions among interdisciplinary staff, unmet resident needs, and a decline in physical or psychosocial well being, ultimately reducing the quality of care.Findings: a.During a record review of Resident 4's admission record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents selected for unnecessary medications (Resident 3 and Resident 46) were free from the use of unnecessary medications by:Failing to monitor and document Resident 3 who was receiving anticoagulant therapy (blood thinners to prevent harmful blood clots from forming or getting larger).Failing to provide an actual indication for the continued use of Ativan (a psychotropic [chemical substance that alters brain function that affects mood and behavior] medication used to treat anxiety) for Resident 46.This deficient practice had the potential for licensed staff to miss signs of bleeding from anticoagulant therapy, increasing the risk for serious complications and delayed medical intervention for Resident 3 and for Resident 46 to experience a diminished quality of life due to adverse effects such as sedation, coma, and death for the continued use of Ativan when it was not indicated. Findings: 1.During a record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medical Director or designee attended the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAA committee, a group of people within an organization who are responsible for reviewing identifying and addressing quality issues) meeting held on 6/26/2026 as required QAA committee meetings.This failure had the potential to adversely affect the facility's quality assessment and performance improvement process by limiting clinical oversight and guidance.Findings:During a review of the facility's QAA Steering Committee attendance sign-in sheet, dated 6/26/2026, the attendance sheet indicated the Medical Director's did not attend the meeting.During an interview on 7/16/2026 at 3:50 p.m., with the Administrator (ADMIN). The ADMIN stated, the Medical Director or designee did not attend the QAA Committee meeting held on 6/26/2026 as required, and no additional documentation was available regarding the Medical Director's absence. The ADMIN stated the Medical Director's participation is essential to provide clinical oversight, educate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the influenza (a highly contagious viral infection that attacks the nose, throat, and lungs) and pneumococcal (an illness caused by the Streptococcus bacteria [a common bacteria on the nose and throat] immunizations (the process of making your body immune to a specific disease) at the time of admission, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 56).This failure had the potential to result in the resident contracting influenza or pneumococcal and developing a life-threatening infection.Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following but not limited to diagnoses of encephalopathy (damage or malfunction of the brain), epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes repeated, unprovoked seizures) and catatonic schizophrenia (a condition that effects one's movements and speech).During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) whose Responsible Party (RP) 1 verbalized a complaint to facility staff, was informed of and helped in completing a Grievance/Complaint Investigation Report. This failure resulted in Resident 1 and RP 1 not receiving timely or formal communication regarding the outcome or resolution of the complaint, which led to distrust toward the facility. This failure had the potential to delay necessary care and services to Resident 1 and could negatively impact Resident 1's mental health and emotional well being.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included hepatic encephalopathy (a decline in brain function which occurs when the liver cannot remove toxins from the blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had recommendations to have referrals and/or consultations with the cardiologist (medical doctor specializing in diseases of the heart) and neurologist (medical doctor specializing in diseases of the brain, spinal cord, nerves and muscles), were implemented. These failures resulted in Resident 1's referrals being delayed for more than nine months. These failures also had the potential to delay necessary specialty assessments, interrupted continuity of care, and increased the risk that changes in Resident 1's medical condition would go unrecognized which could affect Resident 1's health, safety, and overall, well being.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included hepatic encephalopathy (a decline in brain function which occurs when the liver cannot remove toxins…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA 1) accurately documented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), indicating Resident 1 received RNA services when there was no order and when those services were not provided. This deficient practice resulted in RNA 1 documenting Resident 1 was provided passive range of motion ([PROM] the movement of a joint when an outside force, such as a person or machine, moves the body part while the person is relaxed) exercises, to her bilateral lower ([BL] both legs) and bilateral upper extremities ([BLE] both upper arms), a splint (a rigid material or apparatus used to support in impaired joint) was applied to his right knee, and pressure relief ankle foot orthosis boot ([PRAFO] a specialized orthopedic boot designed to position the foot and ankle correctly, relieve pressure on the heel, and prevent complications such as pressure ulcers and contractures [permanent and painful tightening of the muscles that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Registered nurse (RN) worked eight consecutive hours a day seven days a week on 2/1/25, 2/2/25, 2/8/25, 2/9/25, 2/15/25, 2/23/25, 3/9/25 and 3/23/25. This failure had the potential to affect the residents' quality of care and not be able to provide advanced care activities such as resident assessments, developing and evaluating care plans, and consulting with physicians. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/25/25 at 4:08 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The facility's Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) dated 1/1/2025 through 6/24/25 were reviewed. The DHPPD indicated on 2/1/25, 2/2/25, 2/8/25, 2/9/25, 2/15/25, 2/23/25, 3/9/25 and 3/23/25 there was no RN coverage on those days. The DSD stated there needs to be an RN in case of an emergency because the RN has more knowledge in assessing the residents. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/25/25 at 4:08 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia( a pattern of behavior where a person feels distrustful and suspicious of other people and acts accordingly), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type(a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior) depression( a serious mental health condition characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities, impacting how a person feels, thinks and handles daily tasks), and anxiety disorder (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). During a review of Resident 38's History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/8/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 38 can make needs known but cannot make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident screening tool) dated 4/30/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 38 had severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices when the facility failed to: 1.Ensure an open bag of frozen salisbury steak was stored in a sealed plastic bag in the freezer. 2.Ensure an open box of hot rice cereal was dated, labeled and stored in a sealed bag or container. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to food borne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins ). Findings: During an initial kitchen observation and interview on 6/23/2025, at 8:11 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM),observed an open plastic bag of frozen salisbury steaks in an open carton box was stored in the freezer. Observed DM took another plastic bag , placed the frozen salisbury steak in the plastic bag and returned the frozen steaks in the freezer. Observed an open box of rice hot cereal sitting on the kitchen countertop without an open date label.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee ([QAA] develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies) and the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] a group who takes a systemic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents and families) failed to ensure effective oversight of the facility and implementation of the facility's plan of correction (POC) of the deficient practices identified during the previous recertification survey. This failure resulted in the facility having repeat deficiencies in the areas of activities of daily living care provided for dependent residents, formulating advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate), infection prevention, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, food storage, free of medication error rates of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate) were discussed and written information was provided to the residents and/or responsible parties for two of six sampled residents (Resident 2 and 16). These deficient practices violated the residents' and/or the representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate an advance directive and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality) and depression (a mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview , and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 21) was free of chemical restraints (use of medication to control a patient's behavior or restrict the patient's movement and not required to treat the medical symptom) by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 21 was provided non-pharmacological interventions (interventions that does not primarily use medicine ) before administering a as needed) (prn) psychotropic medication(any drugs that affects the brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). This failure put Resident 21 at risk for adverse reactions (unintended, harmful events attributed to the use of medication) due to unnecessary prolonged use of psychotropic medication. Findings: During a record review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 22 and Resident 11) had a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) assessment done when diagnosed with a mental illness prior to admission. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 22 and Resident 11 not receiving the necessary services and appropriate psychiatric( relating to mental illness or its treatment) level of treatment and evaluation in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) paranoid schizophrenia(a mental illness that is characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents' (Resident 2) was provided with personal hygiene care. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2's facial hair being too long to shave with a razor, requiring the use of an electrical razor and had the potential to affect Resident 2's dignity. Findings: During an observation on 6/23/2025 at 10:27 a.m., in the hallway outside of Resident 2's room, Resident 2 was observed with long unkempt facial hair. Resident 2 was observed asking the staff to shave him. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality) and depression (a mental health condition that causes persistent sadness and loss of interest in activities that were once enjoyable). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 60) were provided with a bowel and bladder retraining and/or toileting program (scheduled toileting, prompted voiding or bladder training [help to regain at least some control over patient's bladder]), to regain normal bowel and bladder function as much as possible and received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence. This failure had a potential risk for Resident 11 and Resident 60 to lose their ability to regain control of bowel and bladder function, which could result in loss of dignity. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) acute cystitis (a sudden inflammation of the urinary bladder caused by a bacterial infection),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 48) received respiratory care (specialized healthcare field that focuses on the treatment , management and prevention of respiratory disorders) consistent with professional standards of care by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 48 's nasal cannula (medical device used to deliver supplemental oxygen to a person's nose) was not left on the floor and oxygen concentrator ( medical device that provides a concentrated source of oxygen) were turned off when not in use. These failures had the potential to put Resident 48 for respiratory infection (an infection that affects respiratory tract which includes the nose, throat, and lungs caused by viruses or bacteria). Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 48 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dependence on supplemental oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview , and record review , the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral care and treatment on one of three sample residents ( Resident 167) by failing to: 1.Assess and monitor Resident 167's behavior after verbalization of wanting to die. 2.Follow up physician's notification about Resident's 167 suicidal ideation (thoughts of self-harm or ending one's life). 3.Provide psychiatric (study and treatment of mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders ) evaluation after Resident 167's verbalization of wanting to die. These failures had the potential to put Resident 167 at risk of committing suicide due to delays in care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident167's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia partial ( paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% (percent) during medication pass for one of the four sampled residents (Residents 46 ) The facility failed to: a. Administer Resident 46's Onglyza (medication for DM), Sitagliptin (medication for DM) and Risperdal (antipsychotic medication [used to treat schizophrenia and bi-polar]) within 60 minutes of its scheduled time as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration dated 1/1/2012. These deficient practices of medication administration error rate of 9.09% exceeded the five (5) percent threshold. Findings: During a review of Resident 46 admission Record, dated 6/25/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental illness that is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 46) was free from significant medication errors by failing to administer Onglyza for diabetes mellitus 2 (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), Sitagliptin for DM 2 and Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) used to treat schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) as prescribed by the physician. These failures had the potential to place Resident 46 at risk for hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and angry outbursts. Findings: During a review of Resident 46 admission Record, dated 6/25/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (set of infection control measures designed to prevent the spread of infectious diseases in healthcare settings) were implemented for one of one sampled resident (Resident 22) who had an order to rule out Clostridium difficile (C. diff- a highly contagious bacteria that causes severe diarrhea) due to frequent diarrhea. This failure had the potential to expose other residents, staff and visitors to the spread of infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) paranoid schizophrenia(a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), major depressive disorder(a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who had anxiety (an emotional state that involves feelings of fear, dread and uneasiness), and had Ativan (a medication used to treat anxiety) 1 milligram ([mg] a unit of measurement) to control their anxiety, was provided antianxiety medication, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure licensed nurses ordered a refill of Ativan 1 mg for Resident 1 ' s anxiety before the medication ' s quantity was depleted. 2. Ensure Resident 1 received Ativan for anxiety, as ordered by Resident 1 ' s physician. 3. Ensure licensed nurses contacted Resident 1 ' s MD 1 to obtain authorization to access the facility ' s emergency kit ([E-Kit] a kit which contains a small quantity of medications which can be dispensed when pharmacy services are not available) containing Ativan 1 mg to administer to Resident 1. 4. Ensure the licensed nurses followed the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who lacked the capacity to make decisions, was supervised, and monitored to prevent one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from eloping (leaving a secured institution without notice or permission) from the facility. Resident 1 was last seen in the facility on 12/12/2024 at approximately 10:30 p.m in his room. Resident 1 was noted missing on 12/12/2024 at approximately 11:30 p.m. As of 12/20/2024, Resident 1 has not been located. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 ' s eloping from the facility on 12/12/2024 and his whereabouts being unknown. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to be exposed to excessive drops in temperature, motor vehicle accidents, hunger, dehydration, and death. Findings During a review of Resident 1 ' s General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) records dated 8/19/2024, the GACH records indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the GACH on 8/9/2024 for aggressive behavior and was put on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident rights to be free from physical abuse for two of six sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) separated Resident 1 and Resident 2 immediately when the two residents were arguing over a wheelchair which resulted to Resident 1 throwing a coffee cup to Resident 2's right side of the head. Resident 1 had a recent history of resident-to-resident altercation last June 2024 and Resident 2 had a known aggressive behavior against staff and residents. 2. Protect and prevent Resident 3 from hitting Resident 4 on the face. These failures resulted in Resident 2 sustained a skin abrasion (superficial skin wound) on the right side of the head and Resident 4 getting hit on the face and fell on the floor. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 documented medication as administered in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) immediately after administering Resident 20's Insulin Lispro (a short acting medication used to treat elevated blood sugar level). 2. Ensure LVN 5 verified Resident 20's identity with the MAR prior to medication administration. These deficient practices increased the risk of medication error, including Resident 20 not receiving the correct medication as ordered. 3. Ensure LVN 5 and LVN 2 performed a change of shift inventory of controlled medication (a term used for medications with high level of abuse and dependence) and documented on the count on the facility's-controlled drug count record (a document indicating perpetual inventory and administration of controlled substances) at the beginning and end of each shift per the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Controlled Medication Storage. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1. Dusty fan was located near the dishwasher and a dusty radio was located near the kitchen prep table (workstation for food preparation). 2. Facility freezer and refrigerator were not in safe operating condition. 3. A green substance was observed on the spout of the ice dispenser These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (illnesses contracted from eating contaminated food or beverages) of residents who received food from the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/28/2024 at 3:12 p.m., of the facility's kitchen, a dietary staff was unloading the newly sanitized dishes from the dishwasher and a dusty fan was situated over the dishwasher equipment blowing air to the newly sanitized dishes. Observed a dusty radio was placed close to the kitchen prep table. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices was implemented. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure personal protective equipment (PPE- equipment used to prevent or minimize exposure to hazards) was easily accessible for direct patient care staff on residents with Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- use of a gown and gloves for residents with wounds, and indwelling devices). These deficient practices had the potential for the spread and transmission of multidrug resistant organism (MDROs- microorganisms, predominantly bacteria that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) in the facility. 2. Ensure the facility's Water Management Plan (plan that identifies hazardous conditions and steps to take to minimize the growth and spread of bacteria[germs]) indicated testing protocols (deliberate action to see if something works) for control measures (actions taken to reduce the potential of exposure to the hazard) and documented results of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three freezers and one refrigerator in the facility's kitchen and food pantry were maintain in safe operating condition. This failure had the resident food items stored in an unsafe condition that could potentially place the residents at risk for food-borne illnesses (illness cause by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: During an observation on 6/28/2024 at 3:24 p.m., at the facility's food pantry with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the following were observed: a. Freezer #1 that stored several bags of frozen tortilla have no thermometer to monitor the freezer's temperature. There was an opened bag of tortilla with no opened date tag and another tortilla bag unopened with ice crystals inside the bag. b. Freezer #2 that stored packed bags of vegetables had a temperature of 2 (two) degrees Fahrenheit (°F a temperature scale) and there was an ice build up observed on the upper portion of the freezer. c. Freezer #3 that stored sliced carrots and french fries had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving hemodialysis ([HD], a medical procedure to remove fluid and waste products from the body) provided necessary care and services for two of two sampled residents (Resident 47 and 26). The facility failed to: a. Ensure Resident 47's blood pressure check was not measured using the left arm with the arteriovenous shunt ([AV] a connection that was made between an artery and a vein for dialysis access). This deficient practice had the potential to interrupt the blood flow to the arm and may cause the AV shunt to stop working. b. Accurately measure Resident 47 and 26's intake and output when a full pitcher of water was left and within reach for Resident 47 and Resident 26. This deficient practice had the potential to cause fluid overload (too much water in the body) for Resident 47 and Resident 26. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 47's admission record, the admission Record indicated Resident 47 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent (process by which a healthcare provider educates a resident about the risks and benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention) prior to the administration of psychotropic drugs (medication that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior) for two of four sampled residents (Resident 64 and Resident 41). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 64 and 41 at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication including Lorazepam (brand name Ativan-medication used to treat anxiety [feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness], Olanzapine (antipsychotic medication that can treat several mental health conditions) and lithium carbonate (a medication used to treat manic episodes of bipolar disorder) and Resident 41 receiving olanzapine, and Ativan without clinical justification for use. Findings: a.During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Two medication errors out of 27 opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 7.14 % affecting one of four residents observed (Resident 33) during medication administration. The medication errors were as follows: 1. Calcitonin Salmon Nasal Solution (a medication used to treat osteoporosis [a disease which causes bones to weaken and break more easily]) 200 units ([U] the amount of a medication administered to a resident in a single dose) one spray was administered in Resident 33's right nostril (outer openings of the nose through which one breathes) instead of left nostrils as ordered by Resident 33 physician. 2. Omission of Calcitonin Salmon Nasal Solution 200 U one spray in Resident 33's left nostril. These deficient practices resulted in failing to administer Calcitonin Salmon Nasal Solution in accordance with the physician's orders and increased the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance committee ([QAA] a group of facility staff who identifies, evaluates, and implements measures to improve the quality of care and life for the residents in the facility) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] a group who takes a systemic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents and families, and all nursing home caregivers in practical and creative problem solving) committee failed to ensure continued oversight of the facility's plan of correction (POC) of the deficient practices identified during the previous recertification survey (7/19/2021). This deficient practice resulted in the facility having repeat deficiencies in quality of care, such as pharmaceutical services (procuring, dispensing, distributing, storing, and administering of medications), medication error rate of five percent or more, infection control, and physical environment. Findings: During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 38) who had a history of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental health condition that triggered by a terrifying event either experiencing it or witnessing it), and depression (a depressed mood or loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time) was provided individualized plan of care to address potential trauma triggers This deficient practice has the potential not to provide resident centered behavioral health care services needed for Resident 38. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs and lows), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 27), who was prescribed with antipsychotic drug (a type of medication prescribed to treat mental health problem) and an anxiolytic drug (anti-anxiety medications, that treat anxiety symptoms and disorders) were monitored for behaviors of bipolar (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings) and anxiety episodes every shift. This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 27's behavior of psychosis and anxiety to be unmonitored and has the potential for an inaccurate information necessary for gradual dose reduction ([GDR] tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued. and/ or readjustment) of Resident 27 psychotropic (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record, the admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-30 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 30) Responsible Party (RP) was notified when the dentist recommended the need for dentures (an artificial placement of one or more teeth). This deficient practice had the potential to cause a delay in dental treatment for Resident 30. Findings: During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (damage or disease which affects the brain), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease which destroys memory and other important mental functions), and unspecified dementia (loss of cognitive functioning [thinking, remembering, and reasoning]). During a review of Resident 30's History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/1/2024, indicated Resident 30 did not have the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 30's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 30 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the California Department of Health (CDPH) Licensing and Certification Program (L&C), State Long Term Care Ombudsman ([LTC] public advocate) and the local Police Department (PD) within the regulated time frame of two hours for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in a delay in the investigation of the sexual abuse allegation and had the potential for pertinent data to be lost and/or forgotten. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Parkinsonism (brain condition which causes slowed movements, rigidity [stiffness] and tremors), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions which interferes with doing everyday activities), schizophrenia (a mental health condition which causes hallucinations [when a person hears, sees, smells, tastes or feels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete one of one resident's (Resident 1) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASRR] a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care), when Resident 1 was newly diagnosed with Schizophrenia (mental disorder affecting thoughts and perceptions) and started on Risperdal (medication used to treat Schizophrenia). This deficient practice has the potential to result in a lack of specialized care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's the admission Record (face sheet-FS), the FS indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis (severe infection), pneumonia (infection that affects one or both lungs), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-group of diseases that cause breathing problems) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H/P), dated 2/27/2023, the H/P indicated Resident 1 has the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT) was involved in developing a discharge plan for one of three sample residents (Resident 1), that reflects Resident 1's discharge concerns, needs, goals and treatment preferences. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 feeling angry and distrustful of the staff and the failures had the potential to result in an ineffective discharge planning leading to lack of necessary care and services for Resident 1 after discharge. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's the admission Record (face sheet-FS), the FS indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis (severe infection), pneumonia (infection that affects one or both lungs), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-group of diseases that cause breathing problems) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care-screening tool, dated 9/4/2023, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$33,030 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-04-04
- $23,920 — penalty dated 2025-01-29
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-12 for 43 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2024 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2014 |
| LAZARO, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/09/2020 |
| POLE, SHIVANAND | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2020 |
| BAY VISTA WELLNESS GP, LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/01/2014 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/01/2014 |
| BAY VISTA-LET LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $600K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 056042. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.