Granada Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LP

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 174 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 81.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide services for one resident (Resident 1) when licensed nurses did not provide care for Resident 1's surgical drains (tubes placed in the body after surgery to remove excess blood, pus, or other fluids from a wound or cavity, preventing buildup that could slow healing or cause infections) upon admission to the facility.This failure resulted in Resident 1 having to be readmitted to the hospital for care of a preventable infection.Findings:A review of Resident 1's undated hospital referral form titled [NAME] [Artificial Intelligence Discharge Agent, a software platform used to streamline a patient 's discharge process to skilled nursing facilities] Facesheet indicated Resident 1 had a drain located on the right lateral flank (the side area of the body between the last rib and the hip bone) and another on the right medial upper quadrant (the central part of the upper abdomen) surgically placed on 10/5/25 after surgeons drained a liver abscess (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a fall risk care plan to meet the medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 experiencing injury and pain secondary to an unwitnessed fall on 4/26/25. Findings: A review of Resident 1's, admission Record, dated 5/7/25, showed Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (hemiplegia refers to complete paralysis, while hemiparesis refers to partial weakness) affecting the right side, morbid obesity (a complex chronic disease in which you have a body mass index [BMI] of 40 or higher, with normal range for adults considered to be between 18.5 and 24.9), muscle weakness, dementia (a general term for a group of symptoms that affect thinking, memory, and other cognitive [relating to, being, or involving conscious intellectual activity-such as thinking, reasoning, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing services met professional standards for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents (Resident 2) when complete neurological assessments (subjective and objective data collected through interview and detailed physical examination of the central nervous system [brain, spinal cord] and the peripheral nervous system [other body nerves] was not documented following a head injury.This failure had the potential to delay identification of neurological changes indicative of brain injury or other clinical decline. Cross reference F726).A review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (a facility demographic), dated 6/10/26, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (a decline in memory, reasoning, and cognitive skills severe enough to interfere with daily life), depression (a serious mood disorder characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, emptiness, and a loss of interest in activities), anxiety, and unsteadiness on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of six sampled residents (Resident 2) from abuse when Resident 2 was struck by Resident 3 during an physical altercation on 6/06/26.This failure resulted in Resident 2 being struck on the right temple and suffering a lingering headache.A review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (a facility demographic), dated 6/10/26, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (a decline in memory, reasoning, and cognitive skills severe enough to interfere with daily life), depression (a serious mood disorder characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, emptiness, and a loss of interest in activities), anxiety, and unsteadiness on feet.A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 3/16/26, indicated he had mild cognitive impairment (involves noticeable declines in memory, language, or thinking skills, but are not severe enough to disrupt daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority (Department of Health Care Services [California agency responsible for overseeing the state's required screenings to identify individuals with serious mental illness]) for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 5), who had significant changes in mental health status.This failure had the potential to result in residents not receiving appropriate mental health services based on their most current clinical needs1. A review of Resident 3's Face Sheet (facility demographic) indicated he was admitted to the facility 9/08/25 with diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF, occurs when the heart muscle becomes too stiff or weak to pump blood efficiently), malnutrition (when the body does not receive the proper balance of nutrients and calories required to maintain healthy tissues and organ function), and muscle weakness.A review of Resident 3's Notice of PASRR Level 1 (Preadmission Screening and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-24 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility failed to ensure a sufficient number of dietary staff were maintained to carry out required Food and Nutrition Services functions when dietary staff responsible for cleaning and sanitation were reassigned to cover vacant food preparation roles. This failure resulted in insufficient staffing to complete essential duties and placed a census of 78 residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for potential foodborne illnesses.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the kitchen on 4/21/26 at 8:09 a.m., the facility stove was noted to have large amounts of grease and food debris built up around and beneath all burners. The backsplash behind the grill of the stove was stained with grease. The CDM stated she was an interim traveler CDM until the current CDM In Training (CDMIT) was able to resume classes to become certified. The CDMIT was pulled to work as a cook until the position could be filled. The CDM stated the kitchen was short staffed and had been employed by the facility for three months. During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the kitchen and maintenance staff failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served safely in accordance with professional standards of food service when:Dietary staff did not apply hair restraints properly;Expired food and drink were found in the refrigerator;Moldy strawberries were found in the refrigerator and moldy onions found in a bin in the dry storage area;The stovetop was encrusted with hardened black residue, the backsplash was stained with grease, the side of the oven was encrusted with white and rust-colored residue and the toaster had accumulated amounts of dust in the upper vents above the serving tray. The space between the back of the stovetop, oven and wall had clumps of dust adhering to the wall, pipe and floor; and,Ice buildup was found on the inner gasket of the freezer door.These failures posed a risk for foodborne illness for a census of 78 residents.1. During an observation in the kitchen on 4/22/26 at 10:35 a.m., the [NAME] In Training (CIT) and [NAME] 2 wore hair restraints which did not fully cover the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the licensed nurse failed to ensure that resident information was protected during a medication pass when Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) did not lock the computer screen after preparing medication for three residents (Resident 1, Resident 11, and Resident 29) of 23 sampled residents.This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect residents' personal information from the public.Findings:During a medication pass observation with LN 3 on 4/22/26 at 11:52 a.m., 11:55 a.m., and 11:59 a.m. with, LN 3 closed the laptop lid halfway down and did not lock the screen after preparing medications. Visitors were observed walking past the laptop with the screen partially visible.During an interview with LN 3 on 4/22/26 at 12:10 p.m., LN 3 confirmed she did not lock the computer screen or log out of the resident chart. LN 3 further stated it was possible for someone to see the resident information if they lifted the laptop screen.During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 4/23/26 at 2:24 p.m., the ADON stated she expected LN 3 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensed nurses failed to remove the following from one of two medication carts:One unlabeled bottle of eye drops,Two inhalers without open dates, andThree loose pills.In addition, one expired insulin (medication used to treat diabetes) pen was found in one of two medication storage room fridges.These failures decreased the facility's potential to safely administer medications and prevent drug diversion (the illegal redirection of prescription or controlled medication from their intended medical use to unauthorized or illicit use).Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) on [DATE] at 11:23 a.m. during a medication cart inspection, LN 2 confirmed that:One bottle of [brand name] contact lens drops was found without a resident identifier,Two budesonide (medication to treat breathing problems) inhalers were found without open dates, andThree loose pills were found in Side Two Top medication cart.LN 2 stated medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the nursing, therapy, and maintenance staff failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented for a census of 78 residents when:Staff did not wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) for residents three residents (Resident 25, Resident 40, and Resident 96) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes. EBP involves gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities such as transferring and changing bed linen); and,12 rooms were observed without proper infection precaution signage or easily accessible PPE supply containers; and,Staff failed to maintain a clean oxygen concentrator for Resident 46.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent the spread an infection amongst residents and decreased the facility's potential to prevent bacteria and debris from directly entering Resident 46's lungs, placing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility's admissions or social service staff failed to ensure residents were asked about their Advanced Directives (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions), for one resident (Resident 20) of eight sampled residents when there was no documented evidence in Resident 20's medical record that a discussion was had about an Advanced Directive.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure Resident 20's wishes were carried out during an emergency.Findings:A review of Resident 20's admission record indicated the resident was admitted in February 2026 with a diagnosis of cellulitis (a common, potentially serious bacterial infection affecting the deep layers of skin and underlying tissue) of the buttocks. This document also indicated Resident 20 had a Public Guardian (a court-appointed official or agency that acts as the decision-maker for individuals unable to care for themselves) as their Responsible Party (RP, a person who is appointed as the decision-maker for a resident who is no longer able…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the licensed nurses and social service staff failed to provide written summaries of resident baseline care plans to communicate the initial goals of care for two residents (Resident 8 and Resident 14) of three sampled residents.This failure decreased the facility's potential to safeguard against adverse events right after admission to the facility by ensuring continuity of care and communication of residents' care needs.Findings:A review of Resident 8's Face Sheet, indicated admission to the facility in February 2026 with diagnoses of age-related osteoporosis (a chronic bone disease characterized by a weakened bone structure and high fracture risk), muscle weakness, a pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) of the right heel, and repeated falls. The face sheet also indicated Resident 8 was her own Responsible Party (a person designated as the decision-maker).A review of Resident 8's Baseline Care Plan, indicated Resident 8 was her own RP yet she did not sign the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$38,445 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $30,167 — penalty dated 2025-11-25
• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-05-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA