Oxnard Manor Healthcare Center
1400 West Gonzales Road, Oxnard, CA 93036 · For profit - Individual · 82 certified beds · (805) 983-0324 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.69 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.20 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 60.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 71% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.5%CMS range 40.2–57.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.5–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 60.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 78.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 11.2%CMS range 7.0–17.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.38 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 78.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.10 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy and procedure, the facility staff failed to obtain and clarify Oxygen administration orders from the physician for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) when supplemental oxygen was administered without a physician order.This failure creates a risk for the mismanagement of respiratory distress and potential oxygen toxicity (lung damage that happens from breathing in too much extra (supplemental) oxygen). During review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 10/15/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hepatic encephalopathy (a decline in brain function occurring when a damaged liver cannot properly filter toxins), alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites (an advanced stage of alcohol-related liver disease where healthy liver tissue is replaced by scar tissue; the liver still performs basic functions without causing abdominal fluid buildup…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility Policy and Procedure (P/P) the facility failed to accurately assess for a change in condition (CIC) for one of three sampled residents ( Resident 1) when a ssessment relevant to the change in condition to determine what nursing interventions are appropriate with the overall condition utilizing a physical assessment was done. This failure created a situation whereby the resident treatment and care were not recieved in accordance to medical needs. During review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 10/15/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hepatic encephalopathy (a decline in brain function occurring when a damaged liver cannot properly filter toxins), alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites (an advanced stage of alcohol-related liver disease where healthy liver tissue is replaced by scar tissue; the liver still performs basic functions without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and Policy and Procedure (P/P)facility failed to ensure a resident receiving Hemodialysis ( (HD-procedure done by a trained professional to remove waste and excess fluids from the body when the kidneys stop working properly) received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1)when:1. Pre and post dialysis evaluation was not completed2. A total inspection of an arteriovenous (AV) shunt (fistula, is a surgically created direct connection between an artery and a vein, typically in the arm, for long-term hemodialysis access) site area for color, warmth, redness, edema, and drainage was not done and documented. This failure resulted in Resident 1 developing a severe infection that required interventions. According to the American Nurses Association (ANA). (2021). Standards of practice. Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice (3rd ed.) (pp. 53 - 66). First principle of documentation: 1. Documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses (LNs) were competent in providing quality of care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a comprehensive assessment and individualized care plan was not completed related to Resident 1's change of condition (new onset of infection).This failure had resulted in Resident 1's signs and symptoms of infection not monitored by staff and had the potential to develop complications. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 1/29/26 the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - final stage of permanent kidney failure whereby requiring regular dialysis or a transplant for survival) and dependence on renal dialysis (procedure done by a trained professional to remove waste and excess fluids from the body when the kidneys stop working properly). During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary (OS) dated 2/12/25, the OS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility Policy and Procedures (P/P) the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received timely and appropriate medical care under the supervision of a licensed physician when laboratory results were communicated to the attending physician timely.This failure has the potential to delay/miss treatment and care for the residentDuring review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 10/15/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hepatic encephalopathy (a decline in brain function occurring when a damaged liver cannot properly filter toxins), alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites (an advanced stage of alcohol-related liver disease where healthy liver tissue is replaced by scar tissue; the liver still performs basic functions without causing abdominal fluid buildup (ascites) or major complications), fluid overload (excessive water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had an accurate medical record when a diagnosis of decompensated liver cirrhosis with ascites (an advanced stage of liver scarring where the liver can no longer function properly, leading to significant complications, most notably the accumulation of fluid in the abdomen [ascites] causing abdominal distension, discomfort, and potential breathing issues) was not listed as a diagnosis on the admission record. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive adequate care and have unmet medical needs.According to ANA's (American Nurses' Association) book titled, Principles for Nursing Documentation (Guidance for Registered Nurses), copyright 2010, the guidance indicated, in part, Clear, accurate, and accessible documentation is an essential element of safe, quality, evidence-based nursing practice .to support the ability of the health care team to ensure informed decisions and high-quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess one out of five sampled residents (Resident 6) skin integrity for pressure ulcers (PU - injury to skin and tissue resulting from prolonged pressure). This failure resulted in inaccurate assessment documentation and had the potential for Resident 6's identified care needs to go unmet.During review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Skin Integrity Management, dated 6/27/24, the P&P indicated in part, 1. Assessments a. A Licensed Nurse will complete a skin evaluation when there is a change in skin integrity. b. A Licensed Nurse will complete the skin evaluation weekly.2. Skin Integrity Treatments c. The physician and responsible party will be notified when there is a change in the condition of the pressure injury or skin integrity condition.3. Licensed Nurses will document the effectiveness of current treatment for skin integrity problems in the resident's medical record on a weekly basis . During review of Resident 6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of five sampled residents (Resident 52) when the oxygen order was not implemented as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to place Resident 52 at risk for difficulty breathing. Review of [NAME] and [NAME], Tenth Edition, Elsevier, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 609 in the section titled, Medication Administration, indicated, If there is any question about a medication order because it is incomplete, illegible, vague, or not understood, contact the health care provider before administering the medication. During review of Resident 52's admission Record (AR) dated 12/18/25, the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen) and hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide) (lungs can't oxygenate blood or remove carbon dioxide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of eleven sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 52) received the necessary treatment and monitoring for pressure ulcers (PU - damage to the area of the skin caused by pressure) when: 1. A PU was not measured or documented in Resident 10's medical record after the resident was re-admitted to the facility.2a. A wound consultation and physician treatment orders were not requested for the care of bilateral stage 2 PU's (shallow, open ulcers, with partial-thickness skin loss, and a red/pink base or intact/ruptured blisters) on the right and left buttocks of Resident 52.2b. The admission skin assessment, nursing long-term care evaluations (NLTCE - assessments to determine an individual's need for assistance with daily activities, assessing their physical, cognitive, and psychosocial health to plan care), and weekly skin assessments had inconsistent and discrepant documentation of Resident 52's PU's and/or skin integrity issues that ranged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 108), reviewed for arbitration (a contract in which two or more parties agree to resolve disputes through a private arbitration process instead of pursuing litigation in court) agreement, understood the documents signed during admission to the facility.This failure resulted in Resident 108 signing a facility agreement without a full understanding of resident rights and options.During a review of the facility's admission Record this indicated, Resident 108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included infection following a procedure. Another document titled Social Services Assessment dated 12/11/25 indicated Resident 108 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 which indicated Resident 108 had no cognitive (pertaining to memory, judgement and reasoning ability) deficits. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/18/25 at 11 a.m., with Resident 108,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the electrical outlet was in good repair and was safe for use in one of the resident's rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]), when the socket was left opened without a protective plate.This failure had the potential to affect resident safety and increase the risk of injury. During the observation on 7/8/25 inside room [ROOM NUMBER], the wall electrical outlet outside of the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have a cover plate exposing some electrical wiring inside the socket. The maintenance logbook did not have the requisition for the repair of the open electrical outlet. During the interview on 7/8/25 at 3:00 p.m. with the maintenance supervisor (MS), MS stated that the matter was not brought to his attention neither it was entered in the maintenance logbook by any staff, so no repair was done on the issue.During the review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled Maintenance Service, dated 1/1/2012, P&P indicated, The Maintenance Department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately documented why a medication dose was not given, or that the physician was notified of the missed dose for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) per their policy and procedure. This failure resulted in an incomplete medical record and had the potential for inaccurrate and delayed medical interventions for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of the admission Record for Resident 1, dated 2/4/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and had a diagnosis including but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic disease that causes high blood sugar levels when the body doesn't produce enough insulin, or when the body cannot use insulin properly). During a review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident 1, dated 1/1/25-1/31/25, the MAR indicated an order by the physician for Insulin Glargine Solution 100 UNIT/ML Inject subcutaneously two times a day for diabetes. The MAR further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders and adhere to its medication administration policy and procedures for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Staff did not seek physician clarification for a potential frequency change for a Lactulose (a medication which can be used to reduce the amount of ammonia in the blood of residents with liver disease) order when Resident 1 did not have four bowel movements in a day. 2. Staff did not notify Resident 1's physician of their continued inability to obtain an ordered medication of Rifaximin (An antibiotic that is used to treat and prevent complications in patients with cirrhosis). 3. Staff did not check Resident 1's blood pressure or heartrate prior to the administration of Propranolol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure). These failures had the potential to lead to negative outcomes for Resident 1. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record undated, indicated in part, Resident 1 had diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver (a chronic liver disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to capture/be aware of, a resident diagnosis of cataracts (a clouding of the lens of the eye) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience negative outcomes in care. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/23/25, at 11:28 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON 1), the DON 1 was asked if facility records indicated Resident 1 had a diagnosis of Cataracts. The DON 1 verbalized Resident 1 did not have a diagnosis of Cataracts after examining Resident 1's medical records including but not limited to, the current list of Resident 1's diagnoses, care plan and physician orders. During a review of Resident 1's Eye Health Consult form dated 2/5/24, indicated in part, Resident 1 had a diagnosis of cataracts to both eyes. During a review of Resident 1's Complete Exam/Visit-Office form, dated 7/3/24, from an offsite eye specialty clinic, indicated in part, Resident 1 had an ocular history of OU (oculus uterque [both eyes]) Cataract. The form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and discard perishable food items, from the resident refrigerator, per policy and procedure. This facility failure had the potential for residents to experience negative outcomes, including foodborne illness. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Food Brought in by Visitors dated 6/18, indicated in part When food is brought into a nursing home prepared by others, the nursing home is responsible for ensuring that the food container is clearly labeled with the resident's name and date received and stored in a refrigerator designated for this purpose. The policy further indicated Perishable food requiring refrigeration will be discarded after two hours at bedside, and if refrigerated it will then be labeled, dated, and discarded after 48 hours. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/21/25, starting at 1:44 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON 1) and Administrator (Admin 1), the resident refrigerator was inspected. Inside the resident refrigerator was one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement fall care planned interventions for one of two sampled Residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to lead to negative outcomes for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Change in Condition Evaluation form, dated 12/2/24, indicated in part on 12/2/24, Resident 1 sustained a fall. The form indicated in part Heard loud noise in [Resident 1's] room. And nurse went to check, [Resident 1] was found lying on the floor, head by the door of the bathroom. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan undated, indicated in part, Resident 1 was At risk for further falls due to decreased physical mobility, decreased endurance and weakness. Resident 1's Care Plan further indicated an intervention chosen for Q1H (Every one hour) rounding for anticipation of needs. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/16/25, at 3:51 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON 1) and the Administrator (Admin 1), both the DON 1 and the Admin 1 were asked if the facility could provide documentation indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Registered Dietitian (RD) failed to ensure her skill set related to nutrition assessments was current when standards of practice were not implemented as follows: 1. The RD utilized a method to assess the nutritional needs for elderly residents classified as obese that had the potential to promote weight loss, and was not in accordance with professional standards of practice, without obtaining and/or discussing Resident 53's and/or responsible party (RP) weight goal or preference and potential risks of weight loss for informed decision making for one of one sampled residents (Resident 53). 2. The RD was unaware an unstageable (a full-thickness skin and tissue loss where the extent of damage is not clear because the wound is covered by eschar [a hardened, dead tissue that forms a scab-like covering over wounds] or slough [yellow/white material in the wound bed] pressure injury (a localized area of skin and tissue damage caused by prolonged or severe pressure)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the planned menu for therapeutic diets (part of the treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to eliminate, decrease, or increase certain substances in the diet or to provide mechanically altered food) when: 1. Resident 9, Resident 40 and Resident 26 received salad when prescribed a mechanical soft diet (to make it easier to chew and swallow foods, reducing the risk of choking) that was not on the mechanical soft diet menu. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) 1 confirmed the error had the potential to affect the following resident's prescribed a mechanical soft diet: Resident's 378, 54, 233, 4, 67, 21, 53, 14, 52, 42, 70, 129, 41, 127, 60, 49, 24, 349, 10, 27, 28, 30). 2. Resident 59's meal tray card (MTC) (MTC provided resident specific menu directions to staff on what to serve for a meal) was not followed for a lunch meal related to Resident 59's therapeutic renal diet (for kidney disease). These facility failures had the potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in one resident room and two shower rooms. This failure had the potential to negatively impact residents. Findings: During an interview 10/30/24, at 10:40 a.m., with the maintenance assistant (MS 1), the MS 1 was asked if the facility was up to date with repairs. The MS 1 verbalzied yes. During an observation on 10/30/24, starting at 10:45 a.m., the facility was toured. During the tour one unoccupied room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) had wall damage with peeling paint and a damaged bathroom door frame. During an interview on 10/30/24, at 10:50 a.m., with MS 1, the MS 1 confirmed the wall damage and door frame damage in room [ROOM NUMBER]. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 10/30/24, starting at 4:09 p.m., with Environmental Services Director (ES 1), the facility's two shower rooms were toured. The east side shower room had a door frame in disrepair while the west side shower room had broken tiles…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person focused care plan for 2 of 5 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 65's preference for warm drinking water was not identified in the resident's careplan. This failure resulted in the resident storing warm water via water [NAME] at the bedside by self , with no facility assessment if ok with medications and other dietary intake /food/meal. 2. Resident 40's interdisciplinary team (IDT) nutrition care plan (detailed plans of care created by representatives from several medical disciplines or specialties) did not contain clear and resident specific measurable objectives with the input of the resident and/or responsible party (RP) on their goals and desired outcomes related to Resident 40's weight and 2b. Ensure risks of refusal of a renal diet (for kidney disease) were explained to the RP for informed decision making. This failure resulted in unclear, weight maintenance goal and could impede the IDT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident 's ( Resident 127) electronic medical record (eMAR - a digital version of a resident's medication administration) was accurately signed or accurate documentations were entered when a medication was administered or not administered as ordered by the physician . This failure has the potential for resident not to received the medications as ordered essential for quality of life and well being . Findings: According to Nursing Fundamentals by [NAME], [NAME] and [NAME], second edition, 2010 p. 322, Documentation is the professional responsibility of all health care practitioners. It provides written evidence of the practitioner's accountability to the client, the institution, the profession, and society. Review of [NAME] and [NAME], 6th Edition, Mosby's Fundamentals of Nursing, page 847 in the section titled, Medication Administration indicated, After administering a medication, the nurse records it immediately on the appropriate record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 65) who was hard of hearing, was assessed and assisted in obtaining a hearing device while admitted in the facility to facilitate adequate communication. This failure has the potential for the resident's needs to be not attended and understood by staff . Findings: During an observation and interview on 10/29/24, at 7:39 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER]-1, Resident 65 was observed seated in a wheelchair at the bedside. Resident 65 stated, You have to come nearer and speak louder, I can't hear very well, I left my hearting aids at home as , I don't want it to be lost. Review of the medical record for Resident 65 indicated the following : - facility care plan initiated 6/12/24 indicated At risk for miscommunication r/t: Impaired hearing. Interventions included Discuss with resident/family concerns of feelings regarding communication difficulty. Monitor/document for physical/nonverbal indicators of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure post dialysis assessment and ongoing communication between the facility was completed after 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 127), returned from dialysis and failing to communicate with the contracted dialysis company when Resident 127 was sent from the dialysis clinic to the hospital. This failure had the potential to result in undetected complication(s) of dialysis and compromise the safety and well being of the resident. Findings: During an observation on 10/28/24, at 11:25 a.m., inside room [ROOM NUMBER]-1, the dialysis binder book (binder book residents bring to and from dialysis containing forms and information from facility to dialysis clinic and vice versa) of Resident 127 was on the bedside table. Resident 127 indicated the binder book has been in the room since 10/26/24 (Saturday) when resident arrived back from dialysis. The dialysis form inside the binder dated 10/26/24 indicated, 11. Comments or special instructions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pureed recipe for spaghetti with meat sauce was followed when the consistency was not a smooth, pudding or soft mashed potato consistency as directed in the recipe. Dietary Supervisor (DS) 1 verified there were eight residents (Resident 31, 11, 8, 6, 62, 72, 56, 3) with a puree diet order that had the potential to receive an inappropriate texture. This failure had the potential to result in choking and aspiration (food or liquid is breathed into the lungs, instead of being swallowed) in residents who experience difficulty swallowing. There was a total of 75 residents receiving meals from the main kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/28/24, at 10:30 a.m., with the Head [NAME] (HC), HC was observed in the kitchen preparing pureed spaghetti with meat sauce for resident's lunch meal for those with a pureed diet order. HC placed the mixed spaghetti and meat into the food processor and added 1 cup of red sauce. After blending the food, HC transferred the processed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary practices when a dietary aide failed perform hand washing after touching dirty dishes and before handling clean dishes. This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination and foodborne illness to residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/28/2024 at 8:58 a.m., with Dietary Aide (DA), DA 1 was observed in the kitchen on the dirty side of dish machine wearing gloves while scraping dirty dishes, using a high- pressure water sprayer to spray food debris off from the plate. Without changing gloves or washing hands, DA 1 moved to the clean side of the dish machine and handled clean dishes. The Dietary Aide (DA) 2 then informed DA 1 in Spanish that she had been observed moving from dirty side to the clean side of the dish machine without performing hand washing. DA 1 acknowledged that she did not wash her hands. DA 1 was asked if she had been trained to wash her hands after handling dirty dishes prior to handling clean dishes, DA 1 responded, no. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medical record for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 12) was updated to reflect the changes in a Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST). This failure had the potential to result in a life saving measure or preference of the resident, to be not carried out as ordered by the physician. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 12's Electronic Health Record ( EHR) with the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDS 1) on 10/29/24 at 12:29 p.m., Resident 12's EHR indicated that the POLST dated 07/11/23, indicated Resident had a POLST for a Full Code (to receive all resuscitative treatment). Another physician order dated 09/19/23 stated Resident 12 is a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - no life sustaining resuscitation). MDS 1 indicated Resident 12's POLST should have been updated from 7/11/23 of Fullcode to 9/19/23 of DNR and entered into the resident's EHR. During a review of the facility Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Physicians Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Nursing Manual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an arbitration agreement (a legal contract that requires the parties in a dispute to resolve it through arbitration, rather than a lawsuit) to one resident (Resident 1), in a form and manner the resident or resident representative understood. This failure had the potential to violate Resident 1's rights. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a tool used to assess the health needs and functional capabilities of residents in nursing homes) indicated in part, Resident 1 preferred Spanish and needed/wanted an interpreter to communicate with health care staff. During a review of Resident 1's Arbitration Agreement dated 10/5/20, indicated in part, Resident 1's responsible party signed the arbitration agreement on 10/8/24. The agreement was entirely in English. During an interview on 10/29/24, at 12:16 p.m., with the Director of Admissions (DOA 1), the DOA 1 verbalized Resident 1's representative, who signed Resident 1's arbitration agreement, could not communicate in English. When asked if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted to Resident 1 leaving the facility without staff knowledge and had the potential for an accident while away and without supervision. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for after surgery care (removal of uterus [body part in human female's reproductive system]), with both parents listed as responsible parties. A review of History and Physical by the physician, dated 9/29/24, indicated Resident 1 can make needs known but can not make medical decisions due to developmental delay with BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool used by caregivers in long term care facilities to screen and identify cognitive condition of a resident upon admission) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. admission baseline care plan dated 9/29/24 indicated Resident 1 had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions and physician orders, for one of two sampled Residents (Resident 2). This facility failure had the potential to lead to negative outcomes for Resident 2. Findings: During a concurrent record review and interview, on 8/7/24, starting at 3:45 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON 1) and Director of Rehab (DOR 1), Resident 2's medical record was reviewed. Resident 2's Order Summary Report undated, indicated in part, Resident 2 had an Order for skilled OT (occupational therapy [a form of therapy for those recovering from physical or mental illness that encourages rehabilitation through the performance of activities required in daily life]) for 3x (times)/week for 4 weeks.Resident 2's Treatment Encounter Note(s) dated 5/16/24 through 5/22/24, indicated Resident 2 only received two of the ordered three treatments. The DOR 1 verbalized it was a missed visit. The DON 1 and the DOR 1 could not provide any documentation as to why Resident 2 did not receive the ordered three OT treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 1) was discharged to an appropriate level of care when the resident was discharged to an independent living facility (ILF-a place where residents need no assistance with activities of daily living such as mobility, dressing, eating, toileting, and medication management), instead of a board and care home (homes that provide room, board and 24-hour staffing assistance and care for the seniors with things like dressing, bathing and medication management) or an assisted living facility (ALF -a variety of facilities that provide both housing and personal care). In addition, the facility did not verify the receiving ILF was licensed and fully capable of providing care and supervision to Resident 1. This failure put Resident 1 at risk for harm and not having her basic needs met at the ILF. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Hospitalist History & Physical (HHP), dated 04/04/23, Resident 1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a discharge summary (a review of a residents stay) for one of 2 residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for the receiving facility to not have accurate medical information regarding Resident 1's status and her required needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's undated Discharge Evaluation Summary this indicated Resident 1 was discharged to an assisted living facility and to have home health nurse and therapy services. This document also indicated Resident 1 used a walker in the facility. There was no evidence of documentation of assessments including Resident 1's mobility status like walking, wheelchair use, transfers, bathing, dressing, using the restroom, preparing meals, eating, transportation, scheduling medical appointments, and taking medications. In addition, this document did not include an accurate and current description of Resident 1's learning needs, skin evaluation, and individualized care instructions. During an interview on 11/06/2023 at 3:48 p.m. with licensed nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for one of two sampled resident's (Resident 1) related to Resident 1's dietary restrictions due to dental needs. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience pain and choking with no assistance. Findings: During a review of the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's Care Plan initiated on 12/2/22, indicated in part .Resident 1 has oral and dental health problems likely cavity and broken natural teeth . During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan, revised 8/2/23, indicated in part . 8/2/23 S/P (status post) TEETH EXTRACTION (ORAL SURGERY) and, .Regular-small portion diet, Mechanical Soft Chopped texture, Regular/Thin consistency. TAKE COLD, SOFT DIET. AVOID HOT, SPICY FOODS. During a review of the Resident 1's Order Summary Report dated 10/5/23, indicated in part .Dietary-Diet, Regular-standard portion diet Regular texture . During a review of Resident 1's Dietary Menu Card,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep air vents clean in four of four sampled residents' rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 26, 27, and 28). This facility failure had the potential for airborne diseases to spread in the facility. Findings: During an observation on 7/11/23, at 10:40 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed. The air vent had brown particles covering the air vents grills. The DON acknowledged the dirty vent. During a concurrent interview and observation on 7/11/23, at 10:44 a.m., with the Maintenance Director (MD), resident rooms 25, 26, 27, and 28 were observed. All the rooms' vents had brown particles covering the air vent grills. The MD acknowledged the air vents are in need of cleaning. The MD indicated, housekeeping is the one in-charge of cleaning the vent grills. During a concurrent interview and observation on 7/11/23, at 11:22 am., with Housekeeping (HK), resident rooms 25, 26, 27, and 28 were observed. All the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for residents when: 1. [NAME] Patio exit door could not be shut, as posted, Keep closed at all times. 2. [NAME] medication storage room was dirty and in disrepair. 3. Three medication carts were visibly soiled. 4. Resident 4's wall was damaged with a large area of missing plaster, and Resident 4's bed frame was covered with a sticky substance. 5. Resident 63 and Resident 39's room had scratches, peeling paint, and holes in the walls. 6. Windows in the kitchen and dining room had no screens on the windows and a broken window was observed in the dining room. 7. Resident 8's wall was damaged. 8. Outside trash dumpster lid was not closed, and trash was scattered on the ground. 9. Resident 26's room had a large area of drywall scraped away with peeling paint. 10. Resident 60's bathroom had dried crusty brown stains around the toilet and sink. These failures resulted in an unsafe and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Three medications were contained in labeled bottles in two of two sampled medication carts (east nurses' station cart - C1 and west nurses' station cart- C2). 2. A medication was labeled for individual use in one of two sampled medication carts -C2. 3. A medication was labeled with an open date in one of two sampled medication carts - C1. This failure had the potential for residents to receive expired, ineffective, and contaminated medications. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled Consultant Pharmacist Services Provider Requirements, dated 8/10, the P&P indicated, .Checking the medication storage areas quarterly or upon request, and the medication carts quarterly or upon request, for proper storage and labeling of medications, cleanliness, and removal of expired medications. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled Storage of Medications, dated 8/10, the P&P indicated, Medications and Biologicals (drugs that are not made from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the cook followed the therapeutic puree diet menu as planned on 12/14/21 for residents on puree diet. These failure had the potential for resident's on puree food not to get the calculated nutirional amount their bodies need from each meal. Findings: The facility policy and procedure titled Therapeutic Diets dated revised 6/14 indicated in part, Each food item, served separately in the regular diet, is pureed and served separately for a pureed diet according to the menu spreadsheet and puree recipes. During a record review and interview with cook 1 (CK 1) on 12/14/21 at 10:52 a.m., the Good For Your Health Menus lunch menu for 12/14/21 indicated Mexicali [NAME] and Enchiladas to be served for lunch . CK 1 stated, We have seven patients on the Puree Diet. I will substitute ingredients in the regular diet recipes then puree it to make the puree diet meals. For the Mexicali Rice- one cup of Cream of [NAME] will be used instead of raw brown rice to make seven servings and will not include the 1/2 cup of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe food handling and storage when lids on containers of dry foods (flour, sugar, parboiled rice, and spices) were left open. This failure had the potential to decrease food quality, cause food contamination and foodborne illnesses due to unsafe food handling practices. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview with the dietary supervisor (DS) on 12/14/21 at 9:56 a.m., in the kitchen dry storage area, separate container lids of oatmeal, sugar, and parboiled rice used as ingredients for resident meals were not securely closed and open to air. Further observed the lids on containers of Thyme Leaves Spanish Ground, Ground Black Pepper, Ground Cinnamon, Oregano, and Paprika used in flavoring cooked meals for residents are not securely closed and are open to air. The DS observed the open container lids and stated There are three canister containers of oatmeal, sugar, and parboiled rice with the canister container lids open and not securely closed. The Thyme, Ground Black Pepper, Ground…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease, a severe respiratory illness caused by virus and spread from person to person) and other infectious diseases in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the facility's policies and procedures when: 1. Staff did not wear proper (PPE) personal protective equipment before entering a resident's room on transmission - based precautions. 2. Staff were cleaning PPE, a reusable gown with disinfectant wipes that did not contain bleach. These facility failures had the potential to spread COVID-19 and/or other infectious diseases to staff and residents. Findings: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Isolation - Initiating Transmission - Based Precautions, revised 4/22/2016, indicated in part . Transmission-based precautions are initiated when there is reason to believe that a resident has a communicable infectious disease . protective equipment (i.e., gloves, gowns, masks, etc.) is maintained near the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate, document, and update missing eyeglasses in a resident's medical record (MR) on timely manner for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 11). This failure resulted in the lack of follow -up by the facility's Social Services Director (SSD) in obtaining replacement eyeglasses for Resident 11 which can potentially affect the resident's overall visual fucntion. Findings: During an interview on 12/14/21, at 11:14 a.m., with Resident 11's family member (FM) the FM verbalized two pairs of Resident 11's eyeglasses were lost a month ago at the facility and the SSD was notified. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 12/16/21, at 8:24 a.m., with the SSD, Resident 11's MR /inventory log did not indicate missing eyeglasses or if the missing personal items were replaced. The SSD acknowledged Resident 11's FM reported the 2 missing eyeglasses but it was not documented in the resident's MR /inventory log. The SSD further acknowledged the inventory log should also have been updated when the resident's FM brought in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-Resident Assessment and Care Screening tool used to guide care) was accurate for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 59) when Resident 59's special treatments, procedures, and programs under section O, for dialysis, was left blank. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 59's identified care needs to go unmet and for the resident's medical record to be inaccurate. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/15/21, at 1:55 p.m., with the director of nursing (DON), Resident 59's admission Record, dated 7/26/21 was reviewed. The record indicated Resident 59 had end stage renal disease and was dependent on renal dialysis. During a review of Resident 59's MDS Assessments Section O dated 8/2/21 and 11/1/21, the box under dialysis was blank, indicating Resident 59 was not receiving dialysis. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/15/21, at 2:04 p.m., with the DON, Resident 59's MDS Assessments for Section O were reviewed. The DON acknowledged the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow and implement the comprehensive care plan for one of 24 sampled residents, (Resident 59), with weight loss when the facility failed to: 1. Weigh Resident 59 weekly. 2. Monitor Resident 59's meal intake daily. 3. Provide RNA (restorative nursing assistants provide range of motion exercises that are vital for health and well-being of residents) with dining every breakfast and lunch as care planned. These failures placed Resident 59 more at risk for continued weight loss. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 59's Care Plan for altered nutrition/hydration related to weight loss, the care plan interventions indicated to do weekly weights times four starting on 11/11/21. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 12/16/21, at 5:01 p.m., with the infection preventionist (IP) and the director of nursing (DON), Resident 59's Weight Summary was reviewed. Resident 59's weight on 11/3/21 was 129.8 pounds, on 11/23/21 was 126.06 pounds, on 11/30/21 was 120.4 pounds, and on 12/2/21 was 120.4 pounds. When asked about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin (a medication to lower blood sugar [BS] levels) as ordered by the physician for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 36). This failure had the potential for Resident 36 to develop unstable BS, which could have led to a high or low BS level affecting the resident's already compromised condition. Findings: According to Fundamental of Nursing, by [NAME] and [NAME], Eighth Edition, on page 336, under the section, Physicians' Orders indicated, Nurses follow physician orders unless they believe the orders are in error or harm patients. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication - Administration, revised 1/1/12, indicated in part . Medications and treatments will be administered as prescribed to ensure compliance with dose guidelines. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 12/14/21, at 4:20 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN 3), reviewed Resident 36's medication administration record (MAR), dated 10/21 and 11/21 indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents electrical care equipment was maintained in a safe operating condition for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 25) when the phone jack wires inside the resident's room was open and exposed . This failure had the potential to result in electrical injury to the resident. Findings: During an observation on 12/14/21, at 11:20 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 25 was lying in bed next to the wall where exposed wires were hanging out of a broken outlet. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/14/21, at 11:34 a.m., with the maintenance supervisor (MS), MS acknowledged the exposed wires and verbalized they were from the phone jack. MS further verbalized the wires should not be exposed like that and stated, I need to fix the phone jack. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Maintenance Service dated 1/12, indicated in part . The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 2.5 | +2.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2024 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2012 |
| ORR, JESSICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/17/2025 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/13/2017 |
| SHERMAN, ADAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2024 |
| OXNARD MANOR GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/04/2012 |
| OXNARD HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/04/2012 |
| ERETZ OXNARD LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $989K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056379. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.