No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Montecito Heights Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP

4585 N. Figueroa St., Los Angeles, CA 90065 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (323) 223-3441 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (323) 223-3441 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jun 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
5428 N Figueroa St · (323) 256-3884 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5634 N Figueroa St · (323) 254-2851 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
133 W Avenue 45 · (323) 223-3878 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4600 Marmion Way · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4565 N Figueroa St · (323) 223-0055

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.0%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.7%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.3%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.1%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.1%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.2%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.972.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.451.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
29.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.87U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.40hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.42hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 29.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.87 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.9%CMS range 44.9–74.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.3–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge29.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified2.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting60.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge85.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 5.2–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.671.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.35
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 74.3 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.452 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.55 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

22
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-25)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and distribution practices, by failing to:Ensure food in refrigerators and dry storage were labeled and dated.Ensure food beyond expiration dates was discarded.Ensure potentially hazardous foods were not stored above ready-to-eat foods.Ensure milk that was stored within the temperature danger zone (a range of temperatures, 41-135 degrees Fahrenheit [ F], where harmful bacteria can multiply rapidly) was not served to residents.Ensure unlabeled and expired food was not kept in the resident refrigerator. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacterial growth that could lead to foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming food or drinks that are contaminated by germs or toxins) in all residents who received food from the facility kitchen.Findings: 1. During an observation of the facility's kitchen on 6/22/26 at 7:58 AM in the reach-in refrigerator, an opened translucent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - a mandatory reporting system for healthcare facilities to submit direct care staffing information that is collected and can be audited) for the first quarter (every three months) from 10/1/2025 to 12/31/2025 to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS, the federal agency that provides health coverage).This failure compromised the accuracy of the facility's staffing levels and had the potential to affect the facility not to be adequately staffed and/or have the necessary staff to provide care to meet the needs of the residents (in general).Findings: During a review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report dated 6/16/2026, the PBJ report indicated the facility did not submit staffing data for quarter 1 from 10/1/2025 to 12/31/2025. During an interview on 6/24/2026 at 1:23 PM with the facility's Corporate Payroll Consultant (CPC), the CPC stated they (the facility's corporate payroll staff) did not discover until March 2026 that the PBJ for quarter the facility's corporate payroll staff)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices by failing to:1. Ensure nephrostomy tubing (a thin catheter that drains urine from the kidney into a bag) was found on the floor for one of one sampled resident (Resident 25).2. Implement an effective water management program to reduce the risk of Legionella (a [NAME] of bacteria naturally found in fresh water) and other waterborne pathogens by failing to maintain documentation of routine cold-water monitoring for the facility's water distribution system. This failure had the potential to contaminate and worsen Resident 25's existing Urinary Tract Infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) and the potential to result in inadequate monitoring of the facility's water system, increasing the risk for the growth and transmission of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens, placing residents, staff, and visitors at risk for healthcare-associated infections, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition when the reach-in refrigerator (an upright, standalone, commercial cooling unit designed to keep perishable ingredients cold) in the kitchen had an internal temperature within the temperature danger zone (a range of temperatures, 41-135 degrees Fahrenheit [ F], where harmful bacteria can multiply rapidly). This deficient practice had the potential to result in harmful bacterial growth that could lead to foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming food or drinks that are contaminated by germs or toxins) in 68 of 70 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings:During an observation of the facility's kitchen on 6/22/26 at 7:59 AM, the reach-in refrigerator had a digital display in the upper left corner of the unit which read 35 F. During continued observation, an analog (non-digital) thermometer placed inside the unit read 60 F. During a concurrent review of a document titled Refrigerator/Reach-in Temperature Log posted on the refrigerator door, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure informed consent (a form signed by resident after providers fully explain a proposed treatment, its risks, benefits, and alternatives) was signed before ordering psychotropic (also referred to as psychoactive drugs, a medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) and antidepressant drug (medication to treat depression [persistent sadness, low mood, loss of interest]) and there was a stop date on as needed medication for psychotropic drug administration for one of five sampled residents (Resident 87). This failure had potential for Resident 87 unable to know the side effects of psychotropic medication prior to administering medication.Findings:During a review of Resident 87's admission Record (Face Sheet), admission Record indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 87 on 1/22/2026, and then readmitted Resident 87 on 6/18/2026 with medical diagnoses that included fracture part of neck of left femur (broken bone of left hip), dementia with behavioral disturbances (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set {(MDS), a resident assessment tool}, was accurately completed as follows:The facility did not accurately assess anticoagulant use (medications that prevent or slow the blood's ability to clot) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 6).The facility failed to accurately assess and document the type and location of the dialysis access site (an invasive procedure in which blood is filtered through a machine to remove waste and excess fluid as a replacement for kidney function) for one of one sampled residents (Resident 7).This failure had the potential to lead to inaccurate care planning for the dialysis access site and to cause physical and psychosocial harm to Resident 7.This failure had the potential to result in the lack of an appropriate care plan for anticoagulant therapy for Resident 6. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and accurate medication management practices for two of four sampled residents (Resident 42 and Resident 71) by failing to:-Ensure accurate medication administration documentation of the lidocaine patch (topical analgesics that provide temporary, localized pain relief by numbing nerve signals in the treated area) for Resident 42.- Ensure narcotic accountability record (count sheet) matched the electronic medication administration record (eMAR), for Resident 71.These failures had the potential for medication error, misuse, and/or drug diversion (involving the transfer of a legally-prescribed controlled substance from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person).Findings:a. During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 42 on 4/10/2026 with diagnoses including, but not limited to: chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus 2 (a medical condition characterized by the body's inability to regulate blood sugar levels) with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 24 of 68 residents (unidentified) with a Carbohydrate-Controlled (CCHO) diet order (a therapeutic diet intended to limit or balance the amount of carbohydrates consumed) when kitchen staff (Cook 1) provided twice the amount of potatoes as indicated This failure had the potential to negatively affect 24 of 68 residents' (unidentified) nutritional status by altering the intended carbohydrate content of the meal, which may impact nutrient balance, blood sugar control, and overall therapeutic effectiveness.Findings:During an observation of lunch tray line service in the kitchen on 6/22/2026 at 12:30 PM, [NAME] 1 used a scoop utensil with a grey-colored handle to plate potatoes for a meal tray which indicated a CCHO diet order. During continued observation, [NAME] 1 proceeded to use the same utensil scoop for both CCHO diet orders Regular diet orders (diets with no therapeutic indication). During a concurrent interview with Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD stated that [NAME] 1 should be using a smaller…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu when kitchen staff used a cornstarch slurry (a mixture of cornstarch and a liquid used to thicken soups, gravies, and stir-fry sauces) instead of gravy as indicated in the recipe for 5 of 68 meal trays requiring gravy. This failure had the potential to alter nutrition and increase meal dissatisfaction for 5 of 68 residents.Findings:During an observation of lunch tray line service in the kitchen on 6/22/26 at 12:22 PM, [NAME] 1 used a scoop utensil to pour an opaque, white-colored liquid with gel-like consistency, on top of chopped Salisbury Steak. During a concurrent interview with [NAME] 1, [NAME] 1 confirmed that the cornstarch slurry was being used as a gravy for Minced-and-Moist, Level 5 (MM5) texture modified diets (a diet in accordance with the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative [IDDSI] standardized framework for residents with swallowing difficulties).During an interview with Regional Dietary Supervisor (DS2) in the kitchen on 6/23/26 at 10:15 AM, DS2 observed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI: standardized framework (0-7 levels) that uses consistent terminology, colors, and testing methods to define texture-modified foods and thickened liquids for people with swallowing difficulties [dysphagia]), Level Five minced and moist foods - (All foods prepared for this diet must be soft, moist with all excess fluid drained, and minced to size no larger than 4mm fits through the gaps of fork prongs) meal requiring level five minced and moist foods. This failure had the potential to result in decreased meal intake related to inconsistent and large sized food, meal dissatisfaction, and increased risk for choking and aspiration (inhalation of food or liquids into the lungs) for residents receiving food from the kitchen.Findings:During an observation of lunch tray line (assembly line style meal preparation) service in the kitchen on 6/22/26 at 12:20 PM, [NAME] 1 was observed using a scoop utensil designated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and maintain residents' quality of life by not conducting and documenting a change of condition (COC) assessment for two of two sampled residents (Residents 90 and 89) who were roommates and experiencing an interpersonal conflict.This deficient practice had the potential to cause emotional distress and affect the residents' self-esteem and cause a loss of dignity and decline in psychosocial wellbeing. During a review of Resident 90's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 90 on 6/18/2026, with a diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle is too weak or stiff to pump blood), anemia (body lacks enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to carry adequate oxygen to your tissues), and Diabetes Mellitus (DM-chronic condition where your body cannot properly process sugar from the food you eat). During a review of Resident 90's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/19/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 90 can understand and make own…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines who work together to assess, plan and coordinate care) meeting for Resident 25 about noncompliance with keeping her nephrostomy tube (a thin catheter that drains urine from the kidney into a bag) off the floor was conducted for one out of one sampled resident.This failure had the potential for Resident 25's Urinary Tract Infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) to worsen.Findings:During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that Resident 25 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of UTI, chronic kidney disease (damaged kidneys that prevents blood filtration), and malignant neoplasm of the cervix uteri (a type of cancer that causes healthy cells in the cervix to become abnormal).During a review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) care plan (a personalized document outlining a person's health conditions, care services, and treatment goals) within 48 hours of admission for one of the five sampled residents (Resident 87).This failure had potential to cause delay in care or nursing services for Resident 87. Findings:During a review of Resident 87's admission Record, dated 6/25/2026, the admission Record indicated, the facility initially admitted Resident 87 on 1/22/2026, and then readmitted Resident 87 on 6/18/2026 with medical diagnoses that included fracture part of neck of left femur (broken bone of left hip), dementia with behavioral disturbances (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities with aggression, agitation, wandering, and psychosis [behavior and thoughts are detached from reality]), depressive episodes (persistent low mood, loss of interest in activities, and deep feelings of hopelessness).During a review of Resident 87's History and Physical (H &…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate an anticoagulant (blood thinner- a medication or substance that prevents or slows down the clotting of blood) care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 82). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life, as well as the quality of care and services received. During a review of Resident 82's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/15/2026, with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of long term lung diseases that cause damaged airways and trapped air, making it difficult to breathe), pneumonia (an infection of the lungs that causes the tiny air sacs to become inflamed and fill with fluid), and sepsis (infection-fighting processes turn on the body, causing the organs to work poorly). During a review of Resident 82's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/16/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 82 has limited decision-making capacity. During a review of Resident 82's order, dated 6/15/2026, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update and revise the care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, current treatments, and specific care and services facility staff [in general] need to provide a resident to promote healing and prevent a worsening of a condition) for Trazadone (a type of medication used to treat depression, a serious mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness, emptiness, and a loss of interest in activities) for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 11).This failure had potential for Resident 11 to receive care that was not in alignment with the resident's physician orders and needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 4/12/2026 with diagnoses that included insomnia (trouble falling asleep or staying asleep), unspecified psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality), and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a disorder in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document a follow-up assessment after a change of condition (COC- a significant alteration in a resident's health status requiring physician notification) for one out of one sample resident (Resident 83).This failure had the potential for Resident 83 to continue experiencing nausea without appropriate monitoring and interventions.During a review of Resident 83's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that Resident 83 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs cannot supply enough oxygen to the bloodstream), pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), and immunodeficiency (when the immune system's ability to fight off infectious diseases is weakened).During a review of Resident 83's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 6/19/2026, the MDS indicated that Resident 83 is cognitively intact (ability to think coherently and make decisions independently)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monthly weights was being done and recorded to monitor and assess nutrition and hydration during continued poor meal intake (an ongoing, prolonged inability to consume enough food or beverages to meet the body's physiological energy and nutritional needs) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 17). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate nutritional intake, continued weight loss, dehydration, worsening malnutrition, and functional decline. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (Face Sheet), the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a chronic lung disease characterized by airflow limitation with worsening respiratory symptoms), iron deficiency anemia secondary to chronic blood loss (a condition in which the body has insufficient healthy red blood cells due to chronic blood loss), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for respiratory care, received the necessary respiratory care and services by failing to: -Ensure Resident 1's oxygen nasal cannula (a simple, lightweight plastic tube used to give a person extra oxygen) did not rest on the floor while Resident 1 used the oxygen nasal cannula on 6/22/2026 at 10:29 AM This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience an increased risk for respiratory infections (illnesses that affect the parts of your body involved in breathing). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 2/17/2026 and readmitted Resident 1 on 5/19/2026 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), other specified sepsis (a life threatening blood infection), muscle weakness, reduced mobility, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 33) reviewed for hemodialysis (HD, treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney[s] have failed) received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 1's weight was accurately assessed and documented after dialysis on 6/17/2026. 2. Ensure Resident 33's permcath dialysis catheter (a soft, flexible plastic tube inserted into a large vein, usually in the neck) was accurately assessed and documented on 6/17/2026, 6/22/2026, and 6/23/2026. These failures had the potential for inaccurate information to have been used to calculate Resident 33's dialysis, leading to improper dialysis care treatment orders, infection, serious injury and/or harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 33 on 4/22/2021 and readmitted Resident 33 on 6/3/2026 with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Valproic Acid (a medication that is used to stabilize mood) level as recommended by the facility's consultant pharmacist (a healthcare professional who provides specialized expertise to healthcare facilities, typically focusing on ensuring the safe and effective use of medications) during the Monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR, when a consultant pharmacist reviews and analyzes a resident's medication list, ensuring that the medications are appropriate, effective, and safe) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 61).This failure had the potential for Resident 61 to develop toxic levels (when an excessive amount of a medication accumulates in the bloodstream, leading to adverse, poisonous, or potentially life-threatening effects) of Valproic Acid and experience adverse effects (undesired and harmful effects that occur because of medication, treatment, or a procedure) from the medication.Findings:During a review of Resident 61's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for three of three sampled residents (Resident 50, Resident 86 and Resident 67) when: a. Resident 86's likes and dislikes was not reflected on the meal tray ticket. b. Resident 50's tray ticket was not updated reflecting food texture preferences and request for soups for three meals. c. Resident 67's did not provide food preference accommodation. These failures had potential to cause decreased food intake, weight loss, and decreased quality of life. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 86's Face Sheet (which includes a resident's identification, medical, and demographic information), dated 6/25/2026, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 86 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by chemical imbalances, systemic illnesses, or organ failure), immunodeficiency (a state of body where immune system that fights diseases or infections is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document infection prevent education to one out of one sampled resident (Resident 25) in a consistent and timely manner.This failure of incomplete and missing documentation had the potential for Resident 25 to not receive necessary care and treatment.Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that Resident 25 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of UTI, chronic kidney disease (damaged kidneys that prevents blood filtration), and malignant neoplasm of the cervix uteri (a type of cancer that causes healthy cells in the cervix to become abnormal).During a review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 4/30/2026, the MDS indicated that Resident 25 is cognitively intact (ability to think coherently and make decisions independently) and uses a walker to ambulate (walk). The MDS indicated that Resident 25 requires supervision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to assess two of two sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 63) for pain levels by failing to: 1.Ensure licensed nurses (in general) followed Resident 7's physician orders to assess/monitor Resident 7's pain levels and document prior to administering hydromorphone (a strong medication used for moderate to severe pain, especially when other pain relievers haven't worked). 2. Ensure to reevaluate the pain level for Resident 63 within an hour after the administration of a pain relief medication as indicated in the facility's Pain Management policy and procedure. These failures had the potential for Resident 7 and Resident 63's pain not to be treated effectively and had the potential for Resident 7 to receive too much pain relief medication. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 on 3/20/2025 with diagnoses including displaced fracture (the broken pieces of bone have moved out of their normal alignment [straight line], creating a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to follow safe and sanitary food storage and food preparation practices in the kitchen by failing to: 1.Ensure boxed food items were not stored directly on the floor. 2.Ensure the dispensing scoop was not stored inside the salt container These failures placed the residents of the facility at risk for foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During a concurrent interview and observation in the dry storage room on 5/23/2025 at 6:42 PM with [NAME] 1 (CK 1), a scoop was observed stored directly in a clear storage container of salt and the following food items were observed stacked directly on the floor: a. One clear storage container of rice. b. One box of non-dairy creamer packets. c. One clear storage container of parsley. d. One box of mayonnaise. e. One clear storage container of salt. During a concurrent interview and observation in the dry storage room on 5/23/2025 at 6:42 PM with CK1, CK1 stated the new dietary supervisor (DS 1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC, a notice that is provided to beneficiaries that indicates when their Medicare covered services are ending) to one of three sampled residents (Resident 129). This failure had the potential to result for Resident 129 not to be informed of her coverage end date and not being able to exercise her right to file an appeal of her discharge from the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 129's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/16/2024 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hypertension (high blood pressure), and anxiety disorder (a mental health condition with feeling of worry, anxiety, or fear interfering with one's daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) was accurately performed for two of six sampled residents (Resident 67 and Resident 48) by failing to: 1.Ensure the MDS assessment for restraints (any physical, chemical, or mechanical device or method used to limit a patient's movement or restrict their freedom of movement, typically to prevent harm to themselves or others) was accurately performed for Resident 67. 2.Ensure the MDS assessment for bowel and bladder was accurately documented for Resident 48. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate care for Resident 67 and Resident 48. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 67's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/13/2025 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 67's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a complete baseline care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 23) by failing to address Resident 23's dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney[s] have failed) access site. This failure had the potential for Resident 23 not to receive the appropriate care and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/17/2025, with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure), hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure), and acquired absence of left leg below knee and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 23`s History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/17/2025, the H&P indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 23's physician Order Summary Report dated 3/18/2025, the Order Summary Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care and services facility staff need to provide a resident to promote healing and prevent a worsening of a condition, and current treatments) to meet the resident's needs for two of six sampled residents (Resident 64 and Resident 38) by failing to: 1.Ensure to create an appropriate care plan for Resident 64's incontinence (the involuntary leakage of bodily fluids, specifically urine or stool). 2. Ensure to create a care plan to address Resident 38's oxygen use. This failures had the potential to result in Resident 64 and Resident 38 not to have their needs met. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 64's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/9/2024 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (mild or partial weakness or loss of strength on one side of the body),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for one of four sampled residents (Resident 36) who was at risk for developing pressure injuries/sores (PI, injuries to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) by failing to: 1. Ensure to provide Resident 36 with bilateral (both) heel protectors (a device used to prevent and treat heel pressure sores) while Resident 36 was in bed. This failure placed Resident 36 at risk for developing PIs. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 36 on 1/8/2025 and readmitted Resident 36 on 4/6/2025 with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity) and paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs). During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician orders for one of four sampled residents (Residents 36) by failing to provide Resident 36 with bilateral (both) padded siderails (are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) for safety. This failure had the potential to place Resident 36 at risk for injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 36 on 1/8/2025 and readmitted the resident on 4/6/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity) and paraplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs). During a review of Resident 36's seizure disorder (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain) care plan, initiated 1/8/2025, the care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 48 and Resident 278) received appropriate urinary and bowel care services by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 48 who was continent (able to verbalize/control bladder and bowel movements) on admission, received services and assistance to maintain continence. 2. Ensure Resident 278's urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) did not have a dependent loop (restricts urine flow from the bladder and can lead to improper bladder emptying), and urine did not backflow to the urine drainage port. These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident 48 and Resident 278 from receiving the proper care necessary to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in any part of the urinary system), and skin breakdown. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 48's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 48 on 3/28/2025 with diagnoses including resistance to multiple antimicrobial drugs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services for two of four sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 10) by failing to: 1.Ensure to label Resident 7's nasal cannula (flexible plastic tubing used to deliver oxygen through nostrils [nose] and the tubing is fitted over the patient's ears) as indicated in the facility's Oxygen Therapy policy and procedure. 2. Ensure to change Resident 10's humidifier bottle (a medical device used to humidify oxygen) when empty. These failures had the potential to place Resident 7 at risk for respiratory infections and for Resident 10 not to receive effective respiratory therapy care. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 on 3/20/2025 with diagnoses including displaced fracture (the broken pieces of bone have moved out of their normal alignment [straight line], creating a gap or misalignment between the fracture ends) of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 23) who was on dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney[s] have failed) received dialysis care and treatment by failing to: 1. Ensure to assess Resident 23's dialysis access sites (a way to reach the blood for dialysis). 2. Ensure to assess Resident 23 before and after (pre and post) dialysis treatment on 4/7/2025, 4/14/2025, 4/23/2025, and 4/30/2025. These failures had the potential to result in undetected complications of a dialysis access site and could lead to the delay of necessary care for Resident 23. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/17/2025, with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure), hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure), and acquired absence of left leg below knee and lack of coordination. During a review of Resident 23`s History and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assistive signaling devices used to prevent falls were monitored for placement and function for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to: 1.Monitor the placement and functioning of the bed alarm when initially applied on12/23/24. 2.Monitor the placement and functioning of the wheelchair alarm when initially applied on 1/3/25. Monitoring for the placement and function for the bed and wheelchair alarms started on 3/18/25. These deficient practices had the potential for the assistive devices to malfunction without the facility's knowledge and had the potential for Resident 1 to leave the bed and/or the wheelchair without the facility's knowledge and may lead to accident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 1/28/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer adequate supplemental oxygen in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1 who was found on 9/20/24 at 7:40 p.m. with altered level of consciousness (ALOC, state of reduced alertness or inability to arouse) and with oxygen saturation (O2 sat – measurement of how much oxygen the blood is carrying as a percentage) of 64% (normal range is between 95% to 100%), the facility failed to administer oxygen by non-rebreather mask (oxygen mask that delivers high concentration of oxygen) immediately while waiting for the arrival of the paramedics. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to continue to deteriorate and not receive enough oxygen to sustain life. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/29/24 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents and their family member/next of kin were given the opportunity to discuss and review the documents the residents signed for two of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). For Resident 1 and Resident 2, the facility failed to ensure the Assisted Living Waiver (ALW, program that provides specified benefits to eligible residents to remain in their community as an alternative to residing in a licensed health facility) forms and consents signed by Resident 1 and Resident 2 on 7/26/24 were in the language Resident 1 and Resident 2 could understand. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1, Resident 2 and their families not being aware of what forms and consents Resident 1 and Resident 2 signed. Findings: 1. During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 9/1/21 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson ' s Disease (brain condition that causes problems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a Notice of Proposed Transfer and Discharge to one of two sampled residents (Resident 2). For Resident 2, the facility failed to provide the Notice on 8/29/24 when Resident 2 had a planned discharged to a lower level of care on 9/4/24. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 not be given her right to know in writing the date and reasons for her discharge. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 2 on 1/31/2017 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes (group of disease that affect how the body uses blood sugar [glucose]), reduced mobility, and difficulty in walking. During a review of the Minimum Dat Set (MDS,standardized care and health screening tool) dated 6/24/24, indicated Resident 2 was cognitively intact. Resident 2 needed supervision (helper provides cues or cleans up) with oral hygiene and set up assistance (helper sets up, resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the federally required daily actual hours worked by the staff in an area accessible to the public for four of six days for the month of June 2024. As a result, the total number of staff and the actual hours worked was not readily accessible to residents, family, or visitors. Findings: During an observation in the facility lobby on 6/3/2024 at 8 AM, the Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD: Refers to the actual hours of work performed per patient day by a direct caregiver) did not reflect the actual hours worked of staff and reflected the projected working hours of staff for today (6/3/2024). During an observation in the facility lobby on 6/4/2024 at 9:10 AM, the DHPPD did not reflect the actual hours worked of staff and reflected the projected working hours of staff for today (6/4/2024). During an observation in the facility lobby on 6/5/2024 at 8:36 AM, the DHPPD did not reflect the actual hours worked of staff and reflected the projected working hours of staff for today…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call lights (an alerting device for nurses to assist a patient when in need) were within the residents' reach for two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 113). These deficient practices had the potential to result in a delay in care and services and Resident 10 and 113's inability to request assistance. Findings: a. A review of Resident 10's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/13/2017, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia (an inability to move one side of body) and hemiparesis (an inability to move the arm, leg and sometimes face on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (lack of blood flow resulting in severe damage to some of the brain tissue) affecting the right-dominant side. A review of Resident 10's care plan dated 8/7/2023, indicated Resident 10 was at risk for falls and the interventions indicated, Be sure the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 20 and Resident 47 ) investigated for care planning. The facility failed to revise Resident 20's care plan to reflect a discontinuation of antibiotic therapy (medications that are used to treat infection by stopping bacteria from reproducing or destroying them) and failed to revise Resident 47's care plan after discontinuing a urinary indwelling catheter (a tube inserted in the bladder to drain the urine). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for inconsistent implementation of care plans which may lead to a delay in or lack of delivery of care and services. Findings: a. A review of Resident 20's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/18/2023 and readmitted him on 10/1/2023, with diagnoses including encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction of brain), hydronephrosis (a condition that occurs when a kidney swells and urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 20), by not rotating the site for administration of a subcutaneous injection (an insertion of medication beneath the skin) of Basaglar (a long-acting insulin [hormone that lowers the level of sugar in the blood]). The deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident developing a lipodystrophy (a condition when fat either break down or builds up under the skin, causing interference with insulin abortion). Findings: A review of Resident 20's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/18/2023 and readmitted him on 10/1/2023 with diagnoses including encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction of brain), hydronephrosis (a condition that occurs when a kidney swells and urine cannot drain out from kidney), and Type 1 diabetes (a long-term medical condition in which the body does not use insulin [a hormone that lowers the level of sugar in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 21) was free of unnecessary medication by failing to follow the Physician's Order to discontinue Enoxaparin (a blood thinner given via injection) 40 milligrams (mg - unit of measurement) subcutaneously (SQ - injected under the skin) dated 5/30/2024. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 21 receiving Enoxaparin from 5/30/2024 to 6/5/2024 without a Physician's Order, which placed the resident at risk for internal bleeding, hemorrhage (loss of blood from damaged blood vessels), organ failure, and death. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted the resident on 1/23/2024 and re-admitted the resident on 3/13/2024 with diagnoses that included fracture of left femur (broken thigh bone), reduced mobility and abnormalities of gait (abnormal walking pattern). A review of Resident 21's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/29/2024, indicated the resident had capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of the Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet (specialized diet designed to address specific medical conditions and improve health outcomes) was served per Physician's Order for one of six sampled residents (Resident 114). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 114 at risk for choking and aspiration (inhaling small particles of food or drops of liquid into the lungs). Findings: A review of the admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted Resident 114 on 5/22/2024, with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. A review of the Physician's Order dated 5/23/2024, indicated Resident 114 was to receive a no added salt (NAS) diet, mechanical soft texture (foods that are soft and easy to chew) and nectar thick consistency liquid (slightly more body than thin liquids, but still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dycem (non-slip mat that anchors items to the trays or tables and prevents cups and plates from slipping off trays or tables) to the resident for one of three sampled residents (Resident 39). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident being unable to maintain or improve his ability to eat or drink independently. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 39 on 8/8/2023 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it had to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing), diabetes Type II (a long-term medical condition in which the body does not use insulin [a hormone that lowers the level of sugar in the blood] properly), and muscle weakness. A review of the History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/9/2023, indicated Resident 39 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 39's Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the indwelling catheter bag (a transparent bag where urine was collected and connected to a tubing that was inserted in the body through the bladder) was not touching the floor for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 29). This failure had the potential for Resident 29 to acquire a urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection caused by bacteria entering the urinary tract). Findings: A review of the admission records indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including UTI, Type II diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body has trouble using sugar for energy, leading to high blood sugar) and paralysis (a loss of muscle motor function) of right side of the body. The resident had more memory or thinking problems than other people their age and required assistance with daily activities such as personal hygiene, showering, toileting, dressing, eating, and transferring from bed to wheelchair. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-25 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of 35 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) did not accommodate more than four residents. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate usable living space for the residents and working space for the healthcare staff. Findings: During review of the facility's room waiver request letter dated 5/25/2025, the room waiver request letter indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] did not meet the four bed per room regulation. The letter indicated the rooms had adequate space for each resident. The letter indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] were in accordance with the special needs of the residents and would not have an adverse effect on the residents' health and safety. The letter indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]'s measurements were the following: Room number Room size Number of beds 3 609.17 square feet 7 4 422.11 square feet 5 During multiple room observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of 35 rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) did not accommodate more than four residents inside. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate usable living space for the residents and working space for the healthcare staff. Findings: A review of the room waiver request letter, dated 6/6/2024, indicated resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] did not meet the 4-bedroom regulation. The letter indicated the rooms were in accordance with the special needs of the residents and would not have an adverse effect on the residents' health and safety or impede the ability of any resident in the room to attain his/her highest practical well-being. The room waiver request and Client Accommodation analysis showed the following: Rooms: # Beds: Sq. ft. Sq. ft./bed: 3 7 648.9 92.7 4 5 422.1 84.42 During multiple room observations conducted in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], from 6/3 to 6/6/2024, between the hours of 7:30 AM - 4 PM, it was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Autumn Creek Post AcuteChico, CA 1 of 5Coral Cove Post AcuteLong Beach, CA 1 of 5East Terrace Rehabilitation & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Four Seasons Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPNorth Hollywood, CA 1 of 5Hawthorne Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPHawthorne, CA 1 of 5Los Feliz Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Mar Vista Country Villa Healthcare & WellnessLos Angeles, CA 1 of 5Oakwood Healthcare CenterChico, CA 1 of 5Pioneers Memorial Skilled Nursing CenterBrawley, CA 1 of 5Plaza Healthcare CenterSanta Ana, CA 2 of 5Anaheim PointAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Bay Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLong Beach, CA 2 of 5Chico Terrace Care CenterChico, CA 2 of 5Claremont Heights Post AcuteClaremont, CA 2 of 5Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Fortuna Rehabilitation And Wellness Center, LPFortuna, CA 2 of 5Granada Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 2 of 5Pasadena Park Healthcare And Wellness CenterPasadena, CA 2 of 5San Rafael Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPSan Rafael, CA 2 of 5Tulare Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPTulare, CA 2 of 5Westwood Post Acute CareLos Angeles, CA 2 of 5York Healthcare & Wellness CentreLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Alhambra Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPAlhambra, CA 3 of 5Bay Marina Post AcuteOakland, CA 3 of 5Monterey Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRosemead, CA 3 of 5Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPOntario, CA 3 of 5Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Pavilion On Pico Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 3 of 5Princeton Manor Healthcare Center, LLCOakland, CA 3 of 5Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, LPEureka, CA 4 of 5Ivy Creek Healthcare & Wellness CentreSan Gabriel, CA 4 of 5Kings Healthcare & Wellness Center LPHanford, CA 4 of 5Pine Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPSan Gabriel, CA 4 of 5River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPRedding, CA 4 of 5West Hollywood Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LPLos Angeles, CA 5 of 5Delta Healthcare & Wellness Center, LPVisalia, CA 5 of 5North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPFresno, CA 5 of 5Oxnard Manor Healthcare CenterOxnard, CA 5 of 5West Pico Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre LPLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2014
RONEN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
VACA, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2025
MONTECITO WELLNESS GP, LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2019
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2013
MONTECITO-LET LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$969K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 17%Other / private 23%

This home reported $969K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$434per resident / day
operating cost
$13,199per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$428per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055163. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next