River Valley Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP
2490 Court Street, Redding, CA 96001 · For profit - Partnership · 113 certified beds · (530) 246-0600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 32.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.15 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.57 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 222 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.4%CMS range 41.8–55.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 7.0–12.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 83.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.7–9.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.35 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 106.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.55 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2021-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to evaluate, assess, and provide wound care treatments to three of eight sampled resident's (Residents 37, 42, and 211). The facility also failed to use professionally recognized standards for documenting, and staging pressure injuries. These failed practices resulted in the developing of new, or worsening of existing pressure injuries (wounds caused by unrelieved pressure on the skin) for these residents, which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP an internationally used, and professionally recognized pressure injury resource), revised 2016, Staging pressure injuries are important to ensure appropriate treatment, and the understanding of anatomy is essential when evaluating the type of tissue present in a wound. A review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury and Skin Integrity Treatment, revised 8/12/16, was reviewed, and indicated the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2021-12-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of 22 sampled residents (Residents 37, and 47), whose weights were not within acceptable parameters of nutritional status, received adequate evaluations, interventions, and monitoring. These failures resulted in significant weight loss for these residents, and had the potential to lead to a decline in their overall health condition. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Evaluation of Weight and Nutritional Status, dated 1/19, was reviewed, and indicated that its purpose was to ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status through evaluation of their weight and diet. The facility will work to maintain an acceptable nutritional status for residents, and will do this by monitoring the following: A. The resident's nutritional status and the factors that put the resident at risk of not maintaining acceptable parameters of nutritional status. B. Analyzing the assessment information to identify the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-21 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit the required Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ), staffing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).This failure has the potential for nursing homes to have inadequate staffing to care for residents and can lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/18/26 at 9:30 am, with the Administrator (ADM), the PBJ reporting data was reviewed, the PBJ indicated the CASPER report 1705D fiscal year Quarter 1, 2026 (October 1 - December 31), was not submitted for that quarter. ADM confirmed the report was not submitted due to their corporation having computer issues and they could not submit the PBJ report on time. The facility was unable to provide evidence, by the conclusion of the survey on 5/21/26, demonstrating compliance with the regulatory requirement to submit Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data and reports to CMS.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility did not protect the rights of all residents of the facility to access and review the results of the most recent recertification survey (a recertification survey is an evaluation of the facility to ensure they are compliant with federal regulations, clinical quality, and operational standards so they can continue to receive Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement) of the facility.This failure resulted in residents of the facility not knowing where to find the results to review.Findings:Review of a facility policy titled, Resident [NAME] of Rights, dated 5/2011, indicated (g) Examination of survey results. A resident has the right to -- (1) Examine the results of the most recent survey and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. The facility must make the results available for examination in a place readily accessible to residents, and must post a notice of their availability.During a facility Resident Council meeting (an independent, organized group of residents in a nursing home, who regularly meet to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean homelike environment affecting two out of 21 resident bathrooms housing up to three residents in each room, when the shared bathroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was highly malodorous smelling of a high concentration of urine, with brown staining in the linoleum (vinyl flooring) and surrounding the front of the toilet, and what appeared to be fecal matter (poop) adhered to the toilet tank, seat, and rim of the toilet. The bathroom between rooms 19 ad 20 smelled of urine, had brown staining to the linoleum flooring in front of the toilet, and black staining spreading out behind the toilet within the linoleum.This failure had the potential to result in disease transmission, with increasing health complications and overall well-being issues to those residents utilizing the common space.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Housekeeping - Restrooms and Showers, dated January 1, 2012, indicated, the purpose was To…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents (Resident 33) was administered an inhaler (hand held device that delivers medication directly into the lungs), in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. This failure had the potential for the medication to be ineffective and have a negative impact on the resident's respiratory health. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Specific Medication Administration Procedures, dated 5/2022, the P&P indicated, Oral inhalation administration purpose is to allow for safe, accurate, and effective administration of medication using an oral inhaler with or without a spacer/chamber or nebulizer. Review the packet insert if unfamiliar with the inhalation device provided: Procedure: Ask resident to breathe out as deeply as possible (do not exhale into inhaler). Position inhaler for administration: If not using a spacer: Open mouth and position the inhaler one or two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to manage urinary retention (the inability to empty the bladder of urine) for one of four residents sampled (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not urinate for over 14 hours, which can be a life-threatening medical emergency.This failure resulted in delayed treatment of Resident 1's urinary retention.Findings:Review of, National Institute of Health (a nationally recognized professional resource) webpage titled, Definitions & Facts of Urinary Retention dated December 2019 indicated that acute (sudden) urinary retention (the inability to empty the bladder of urine) can be life-threatening.Review of, National Institute of Health (a nationally recognized professional resource) webpage titled, Treatment of Urinary Retention dated December 2019 indicated that the treatment for acute urinary retention is to drain the bladder using a urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine also known as a Foley…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an outbreak of gastroenteritis (symptoms could include vomiting and diarrhea, which could be caused by an infection) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, responsible to protect the health of the public) in a timely manner. This failure had the potential for infection to spread to all residents, facility staff, and the community. Findings: A review of the All Facilities Letter 23-08 (a letter from the Center for Health Care Quality, responsible for regulatory oversight, that contained reminders, recommendations, or information regarding changes in healthcare requirements), dated 1/18/23, indicated, an outbreak was defined as a disease or condition that affected more residents than expected, included gastroenteritis (an illness that caused vomiting, diarrhea, and stomach pain), and Outbreaks of any condition should generally be reported. A review of the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Unusual Occurrence Reporting, revised 5/30/24, indicated, unusual occurrences would be reported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor output of foley catheters (FC - a thin, flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder into a bag) per facility policy and physician orders for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3). This failure had the potential to endanger the residents and cause complications due to inaccuracies in fluid balance monitoring. Findings: A record review of facility policy Catheter – Care of dated 6/10/21 indicated Nursing staff will assess urinary drainage for signs and symptoms of infection, noting cloudiness, color, sediment, blood, odor, and amount of urine. A record review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy (here there's a blockage in the urinary tract, preventing the normal flow of urine), atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat where the upper chambers of the heart beat out of sync and very rapidly), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform one of three sampled resident's (Resident 1) representative (RP), of a change in Resident 1's condition which required the resident to have oxygen administered. This failure violated Resident 1 and her RP's right to be fully informed of a need to alter treatment before the treatment was initiated, and make choices that were consistent with Resident 1's wishes. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change of Condition Notification dated April 1, 2015, Change of Condition Notification indicated, The Licensed Nurse will notify the family/surrogate decision-makers of any changes in the resident's condition as soon as possible. A review of Resident 1's medical record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Metabolic Encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood due to illness or organs not working adequately), Urinary Tract Infection,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility administered oxygen (02) without a physician's order to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to lead to negative resident clinical outcomes when nurses choose to administer medications without an order to do so by a physician. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration, dated January 1, 2012, Medication Administration indicated, Medication will be administered directly by a licensed nurse and upon the order of a physician or licensed independent practitioner. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Metabolic Encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood due to illness or organs not working adequately), Urinary Tract Infection, and Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition (poor nutritional intake). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician when a medication was not available for administration for 1 (Resident #58) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Orders, dated 04/2008, specified, The prescriber is contacted for direction when the medication will not be available. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #58 on 08/17/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/27/2024, revealed Resident #58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #58's care plan included a focus area initiated 05/31/2023 that indicated the resident used psychotropic medications related to bipolar disorder. Interventions directed staff to administer psychotropic medications as ordered by the physician and monitor for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure staff accurately coded a Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 4 (Residents #8, #25, #44, and #52) of 22 sampled residents. Findings included: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual version 1.19.1 dated 10/2024 indicated, 1.3 Completion of the RAI included Over time, the various uses of the MDS have expanded. While its primary purpose as an assessment instrument is to identify resident care problems that are addressed in an individualized care plan, data collected from MDS assessments are also used for the Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System (SNF PPS) Medicare reimbursement system, many State Medicaid reimbursement systems, and monitoring the quality of care provided to nursing home residents. The manual indicated, The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements that require (1) the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #18) of 6 residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings included: A facility policy titled, P-NP04 admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR), revised on 04/24/2024, indicated, 5. The Facility MDS [Minimum Data Set] Coordinator will be responsible for accessing and ensure updates to the PASRR are completed per MDS guidelines. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 07/21/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of unspecified bipolar disorder (onset date 07/31/2023), mild recurrent major depressive disorder (onset date 07/31/2023), and generalized anxiety disorder (onset date 07/31/2023). An annual MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/07/2024, revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a person-centered comprehensive care plan for 2 (Resident #44 and Resident #52) of 22 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to include the use of a non-invasive mechanical ventilator for Resident #44 and Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) results for Resident #52 on the comprehensive care plan. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Planning, revised 03/01/2014, indicated, It is the policy of this Facility to provide person-centered, comprehensive and interdisciplinary care that reflects best practice standards for meeting health, safety, psychosocial, behavioral, and environmental needs of residents in order to obtain or maintain the highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #44 on 12/12/2019. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of obstructive sleep apnea and dependence on supplemental oxygen. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure non-invasive mechanical ventilation equipment was cleaned and stored properly for 1 (Resident #44) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, BiPAP [bilevel positive airway pressure] and CPAP [continuous positive airway pressure], dated 09/10/2020, specified, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is delivered in a single constant pressure during inhalation and exhalation. BiPAP is the Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure or Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NPPV) that delivers two pressures, lesser pressure delivered on exhalation and a second greater pressure on inhalation. The policy also indicated, VIII. Cleaning included A. Keep the outside of the machine free from dust and debris. Clean using a cloth and disinfectant weekly and as needed. B. Replace the hose weekly and as needed. C. Disassemble the CPAP/BiPAP mask by removing the head hear (straps) and cushion from face D. Replace head gear (straps) weekly or as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were received from the pharmacy in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #58) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Ordering and Receiving From Pharmacy, dated 02/2008, indicated, Medications and related products are received from the dispensing pharmacy on a timely basis. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #58 on 08/17/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/27/2024, revealed Resident #58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #58's care plan included a focus area initiated 05/31/2023 that indicated the resident used psychotropic medications related to bipolar disorder. Interventions directed staff to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of pharmacy consultant recommendations for 1 (Resident #56) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Consultant Pharmacist Reports IIIAI: Medication Regimen Review, revised 01/2018, indicated, All findings and recommendations are reported to the director of nursing and the attending physician the medical director and the administrator. The policy also indicated, G. Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #56 on 07/11/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/21/2024, revealed Resident #56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plans (a plan that outlined resident goals, care needed, and support the facility staff would provide) for two out of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 7) when Licensed Nurses (LN) did not update the care plan after Residents 2 and 7 had a fall. This had the potential for an increase in falls and injuries. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Fall Prevention and Management Program, revised, 8/1/14, indicated, after a resident fell, the care plan would be initiated or updated. A review of the facility ' s P&P titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, revised 11/1/18, indicated, Additional changes or updates to the resident ' s comprehensive care plan will be made based on the assessed needs of the resident. A review of the undated admission Record, indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dementia (memory loss), epilepsy (brain disorder that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were followed when two staff members were observed not wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE-equipment worn to create a barrier between infectious material and a person including, gloves, gown, N95 (specialized mask), and eye shields) in COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory disease caused by the coronavirus) positive resident rooms. This failure had the potential to spread infection among residents, visitors, and staff. Findings: During an observation in Station 1 ' s hallway on 9/23/24 at 9:10 AM, eight rooms (23, 24, 29, 31, 33, 34, 35, and 36) were observed having isolation signs outside their doors. The signs posted read Isolation room with instructions indicating that prior to entering the room, one must clean hands (hand hygiene), don (put on) gown, N95 (mask), eye protection (eye shield) and gloves. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/23/24 at 9:31 AM, Licensed Vocational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy and procedure (P&P) for an abuse allegation that involved two out of four sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when the facility did not provide the State Survey Agency (SA) with results of the facility ' s investigation of the alleged abuse within five (5) working days. The lack of facility oversight placed residents at risk for further potential abuse. Findings: A review of the facility ' s P&P titled, Reporting Abuse, revised 1/8/14, indicated, The Administrator, or his designee, shall provide the appropriate agencies or individuals with a written report of the findings of the investigation withing five (5) working days of the incident A review of Resident 1 ' s undated admission Record, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of high blood pressure and anxiety. Resident 1 was not her own responsible party (RP, person that made decisions). A review of Resident 2 ' s undated admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify specific risk factors (root cause, the reason why), reevaluate interventions (written instructions that described care provided), monitor interventions for effectiveness, and follow their policies and procedures (P&P) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) that were identified as an elopement (leave without supervision) risk. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s second elopement on 9/7/24 and placed Resident 1 at an increased risk for continued elopement and injury. Findings: A review of the facility ' s P&P titled, Wandering and Elopement, revised 7/1/17, indicated, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of medical professionals that discussed resident concerns and required care needs) would review, re-evaluate, and develop a care plan (a plan that included interventions and care the resident required) that included individual risk factors for residents that were identified as elopement risks. The P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to report the results of the facility investigation with corrective actions related to abuse, per state law and the facility policy, to the State Survey Agency within five (5) working days of the incident, when one of two sampled resident ' s abuse incidents (Resident 1 and 2) was not reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within 5 working days of the alleged abuse incidents occurring and presumptively being investigated with result determination and corrective action taken. This failure to report that an abuse incident was investigated resulting in a determination with corrective action taken by the facility had the potential to subject residents to continued abuse situations with no oversight. Findings: The facility reported to CDPH on 8/2/24 that Residents 1 and 2 were involved in an altercation where Resident 1 slapped Resident 2 on the arm on 8/1/24. During a review of the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Reporting Abuse, dated 1/18/14, indicated, The Administrator, or his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) mail was delivered unopened and within 24 hours, per facility policy. This failure resulted in violating Resident 1's right to forms of communication with privacy and the potential for mental anguish. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy titled, Resident Rights-Mail revised 1/1/12, the policy indicated, Mail is delivered to the resident unopened. Mail is delivered to the resident within twenty-four (24) hours of delivery to premises or to the Facility ' s post office box (including Saturday deliveries). A review of Resident 1's admission Record (undated), indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, bone infection of the left leg, anxiety, cancer, and homelessness. A review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status), dated 7/10/24, indicated Resident 1's Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively assess and obtain a wound care treatment order for a surgical wound for two weeks after admission, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was admitted with a surgical wound that Resident 1 refused to have assessed by staff, and the facility waited two weeks for the Orthopedic (Ortho, medical branch concerned with conditions involving the musculoskeletal system), follow-up appointment to obtain an order for Resident 1's wound care and treatment. This failure had the potential to result in increased health and healing deterioration including worsening of the wound, heightened infection issues, including sepsis, loss of limb, and death, and aggravated mental and psychosocial decline. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, admission and Orientation of Residents , dated October 2017, the admission and Orientation of Residents indicated, Upon admission, the resident's Attending Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) got an activities schedule and a newletter (a written document about facility news and upcoming activities), for the months of June and July 2024. These failures caused Resident 1 to not know when activities were scheduled, what activities were being offered, or what the current news of the facility was, which violated his right to be informed and make decisions regarding his activities. Findings: Review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a document in a patient's medical chart or electronic health record that summarizes important information about the patient), indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Epilepsy (seizure disorder which is caused by excessive and abnormal nerve cell activity in the brain), muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and depression. During an interview and observation on 7/2/24 at 2:30 PM, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 pointed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one or four sampled residents (Resident 2's) dignity was honored and that Resident 2 was respected when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) X did not stop when Resident 2 asked CNA X to stop trying to move her without the help of another person. This failure resulted in Resident 2 feeling afraid because the lack of respect shown by CNA X triggered Resident 2's Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - anxiety and flashbacks triggered by a traumatic event). Findings: Review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (a document in a patient's medical chart or electronic health record that summarizes important information about the patient), indicated that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, morbid obesity (body weight more than 80-100 pounds above their ideal body weight, Epilepsy (seizure disorder which is caused by excessive and abnormal nerve cell activity in the brain), PTSD, developmental delay (when a child…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) X had knowledge about how much assistance was needed for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2), when CNA X provided cleaning for incontinence (inability to control the flow of urine from the bladder or the escape of feces from the rectum), without the help of a second person to roll Resident 2 in bed. This failure resulted in Resident 2 experiencing unnecessary discomfort during incontinent care. Findings: Review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (a document in a patient's medical chart or electronic health record that summarizes important information about the patient), indicated that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, morbid obesity (body weight more than 80-100 pounds above their ideal body weight), Epilepsy (seizure disorder which is caused by excessive and abnormal nerve cell activity in the brain), Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - anxiety and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their dialysis policy and procedure (P&P) for four out of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 3, 4, and 5) when: 1. Resident 1 was not provided lunch before leaving the facility for a dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stopped working) appointment, was not provided a meal to take to dialysis, and was not provided a meal upon return to the facility after her dialysis appointment. 2. Pre (before), during, and post (after) dialysis assessments (the assessment included information regarding the residents before, during, and after dialysis, such as, vital signs, lung sounds, skin condition, dialysis access site, weight, and if a meal was sent) were not completed consistently for Residents 1, 3, 4, and 5). These failures had the potential for decline in health to go unnoticed and negatively impact resident health status. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's P&P titled, Dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident ' s rights of being treated in a dignified manner for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, rolled Resident 2 from side to side during changing her brief, and Resident 2 thought she smacked her on the hip which made her feel violated and indignant. This failure had the potential to cause harm both physically and emotionally leading to a decline in health status due to possible withdrawal and desolation from care providers and the care being provided. Findings: Resident 2's record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, a stroke, diabetes, and high blood pressure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, tool for resident assessment and care screening), dated 9/29/2023, indicated that Resident 2 ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs), revealed Resident 2 was assessed at 15/15, no cognitive deficits. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe infection control program when unlicensed staff performed COVID-19 (COVID, a respiratory illness that caused many elderly people to be hospitalized ) testing on residents of the facility and COVID testing in-service (education and training provided to staff) documentation was not available. This failure had the potential to result in harm to residents and for COVID specimen samples to be collected incorrectly which could cause a false negative or false positive test result. Findings: During a review of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), revised 6/28/23, (a document created by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Center for Health Care Quality) utilized by skilled nursing facilities, the FAQ clarified information and instructions that were discussed during Infection Prevention Calls regarding COVID. The FAQ indicated, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA, unlicensed assistive personnel) could observe someone who performed a self-swab COVID test and were not permitted to perform a COVID swab test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not have sufficient Certified Nursing Assistant staffing to provide timely care of residents, answering of call lights and prevention of incontinence. This failure has the potential to cause mental distress, anguish and adverse clinical outcomes. Findings: During private interviews on 12/07/21 at 10:01 am, three residents reported that they have to wait up to a half hour for CNA's to answer call lights. They reported that the slow responses have been more frequent lately and on the night shift. The residents have reported that they have had some accidents because of having to wait. All residents interviewed, were and oriented. During a concurrent record review, and interview, on 12/7/21 at 3:30 pm, with the Director of Nursing (DON). She reviewed staffing sheets for Station 2, dated 10/29/21, and 10/30/21. The DON stated, There are between 55-60 Residents on Station Two, and we should have one licensed nurse and three CNAs on the night shift. The night shift staffing sheets on 10/29/21, 10/30/21, and 12/04/21, had two or fewer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-09 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food safety and resident nutrition care processes were adequately in place when: 1. There was no facility Registered Dietitian (RD) from mid-September 2021 through 12/3/2021. 2. Regular monthly food safety and sanitation inspections were not consistently performed by the RD to monitor food safety, sanitation and resident nutrition care processes, and identified deficiencies in the Dietary Department, that would then be addressed or resolved timely. 3. There was not an effective or consistent system in place to ensure timely communication between nursing services, and dietary services related to resident nutrition care. These failures have the potential to result in foodborne illness, negatively impact resolution of resident food preference and quality concerns, decrease timely and effective nutrition care, and negatively impact the health of residents living in the facility. Findings: 1. The facility did not have a Registered Dietitian from mid-September 2021 to 12/3/2021. The facility's document titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was flavorful and prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value. This failure has the potential to negatively impact resident's nutrition intake, health, and quality of life. Findings: On 12/6/21 at 10:20 am, surveyors stated that during initial interviews, that multiple residents had complained about mushy vegetables, and one complained of no salt being available. During an interview, in the dining room with Resident 48 on 12/6/21 at 1:35 pm, he stated he is not a picky eater, but they don't put enough seasoning in the food. During a confidential interview, on 12/6/21 at 1:45 pm, a resident stated that the breakfast toast was stale. It's served without jelly, and seems a lot like it is not toasted. I am not getting any jam at all. During an interview, with Resident 47 on 12/7/21 at 9:40 am, she complained I don't like their food. It has no flavor. It's terrible. It has no flavor, no taste. The pasta has no salt. Salt and pepper packets are provided on meal trays, but the food is still…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to create and implement a menu system that met resident food preferences into the facility menu cycle. This failure has the potential to result in resident dissatisfaction with the meal service, decrease meal intakes, and increase the risk for weight loss, malnutrition, and overall health decline. Findings: During an interview, in the dining room with Resident 48 on 12/6/21 at 1:35 pm, he stated he is not a picky eater, but they don't put enough seasoning in the food. A review of Resident 48's meal tray ticket, printed 12/8/21, indicated that he was on a Fortified diet (provides extra calories) with regular consistency. Dislikes listed were rolls and bread. There were no Likes, listed. During a confidential interview, a resident stated if you wanted a food substitute you had to let the kitchen know two-hours in advance. Like fish and chips, I may not know (it's being served), and then it is too soon for getting the substitute. The posted menu is now what I get. My room is too far away for my (alternative) menu's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared and distributed in accordance with professional food safety standards when: 1. Staff failed to wash hands, change gloves between tasks, and use gloves as personal protective equipment, increasing the potential for cross contamination to occur. 2. Staff did not consistently wear aprons, potentially resulting in cross-contamination between staff clothing, food, and equipment during food preparation meal service, and dish washing processes. 3. The kitchen was not sanitary. 4. Fixed equipment (equipment that cannot be cleaned in the dish washer or in the three-compartment sink) was not washed and rinsed prior to sanitizing, and air dry. 5. Food was not stored, labeled, dated or discarded appropriately. 6. Produce was not washed according to professional standards of practice. These practices have the potential to result in foodborne illness for residents consuming food from the facility food services which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: 1. Staff failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify, develop, and implement a plan of action to correct deficiencies related to residents receiving adequate nutrition to prevent significant weight loss, and facility acquired pressure ulcers. As a result of this failure deficiencies were present regarding severe weight loss for two residents, and facility acquired pressure ulcers for two residents. (Refer to F 686 and 692) Findings: During an interview, on 12/09/21 at 2:57 pm, the Administrator (Admin) reported that he started in his current position around 45-days ago. The Admin reported that the Quality committee meets monthly now, but before he arrived, the committee had been meeting quarterly, which he did not think was sufficient. When he first started as Administrator, they had a QAPI meeting to help staff focus on issues. The issues identified included weight loss, pressure ulcers, falls, staffing, and gradual dose reductions for psychotropic medications (drugs used to control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its policies regarding pneumococcal immunizations (vaccines to prevent pneumonia) were followed when three of five randomly sampled residents (Residents 26, 28, and 49) had not received both pneumococcal immunizations. This failure had the potential to result in these residents, and other residents residing in the facility becoming ill with pneumonia. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Pneumococcal Disease Prevention, dated 2/18/21, was reviewed, and indicated that the facility will offer pneumococcal immunizations to each Resident, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations, unless it is medically contraindicated, or the Resident has already been immunized. Pneumococcal vaccination is recommended for the following residents: Adults 65-years old and older, residents of nursing homes or long term care facilities. The policy indicated that two pneumococcal vaccines are currently approved for adult use in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an initial baseline care plan within 48-hours of admission, for one of four newly admitted residents (Resident 112). Resident 112 was admitted with known skin issues, and the baseline care plan did not include this problem. This failure had the potential to result in the worsening of the skin problems, which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, dated 11/2018, was reviewed, and indicated that the baseline care plan must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission. It should address resident specific health and safety concerns to prevent decline or injury, and would identify needs for supervision, behavioral interventions, and assistance with activities of daily living, as necessary. Resident 112's medical record was reviewed. Resident 112 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. The facility's policy titled, Fall Management Program, revised 3/13/21, was reviewed, and indicated that following every resident fall, the licensed nurse will perform a post-fall evaluation and update, initiate or revise the resident's care plan as necessary. For an unwitnessed fall, or a witnessed fall with suspected or known head injury, the licensed nurse will complete neurological checks for 72-hours following the fall incident. Resident 63's medical record was reviewed. Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included; a pubic rami fracture (fracture of the ring of bones near the tailbone), a right femur (upper leg bone) fracture, diabetes (high blood sugar), dementia, anxiety, and high blood pressure. Resident 63's record indicated that on 9/17/21, Resident 63 had an unwitnessed fall. A fall care plan was not developed until 9/24/21, seven days after the fall. The care plan problem had not included the root cause of the fall therefore, no new interventions were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for two of 22 residents (Residents 36 and 42), the facility failed to provide activities as indicated in their comprehensive care plans. This failure had the potential to result in a decline in their mental and psychosocial well-being, which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Activities Program, dated 11/1/13, was reviewed and indicated that its purpose was, to encourage residents to participate in activities to make life more meaningful, to stimulate and support physical and mental capabilities to the fullest extent, and to enable the resident to maintain their highest attainable social, physical, and emotional functioning. The policy indicated that after completion of the initial Activity Assessment and the MDS, an individualized Care Plan will be developed and implemented for each resident. The resident's activity plan will be reviewed, and up-dated at least quarterly and with any change of condition. As needed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their fall management policy for one of five sampled residents (Resident 63) when they failed to initiate appropriate assessments and monitoring following multiple falls. This had the potential for post fall injuries and changes in condition to go unrecognized, and therefore untreated which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: The facility's policy titled, Fall Management Program, revised 3/13/21, was reviewed and indicated that following every resident fall, the licensed nurse will perform a post-fall evaluation and update, initiate or revise the resident's care plan as necessary. For an unwitnessed fall or a witnessed fall with suspected or known head injury, the licensed nurse will complete neurological checks (which includes monitoring for injuries associated with head trauma) for 72-hours following the fall incident. The neurological checks are ordered at the following frequency listed equaling a total of 72-hours. a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to make sure that there was a secure, and safe method for disposal of medications and narcotics (strong pain medications). This failure had the potential to lead to drug diversion (the illegal distribution, or abuse of prescription drugs, or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber) and possible exposure of the residents to potentially hazardous substances. Findings: The facility policy titled, Controlled Substance Disposal, revised 1/1/18, was reviewed, and indicated that medications included in the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) classification as controlled substances were subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations. The Director of Nursing (DON), in collaboration with the consultant pharmacist, are responsible for the facility's compliance with federal and state laws and regulations in the handling of controlled medications. When a dose of a controlled medication was removed from the container for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a safe, functional and sanitary environment when: 1. The floors, walls, ceiling, cabinets and shelving in the Food and Nutrition Services kitchen were not maintained clean and in good repair. 2. The walk-in refrigerator fans and light were not maintained sanitary and it good repair. These failures have the potential to negatively impact the food safety and sanitation of food service areas and can be a safety issue for staff. Findings: During an observation, and concurrent record review, and interview, with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) on 12/6/21 at 9:30 am, in the Ice Room, metal shelving storing dietary services supplies were rusty. The ceiling in the ice room had broken tiles, a water stain, and an opening larger than the two tubes running through the ceiling to the top of the ice machine. The ceiling vent was rusty, and built up with grime. Paint on the walls and door frame was chipped and uncleanable. The exterior of the ice machine was covered with a white substance resembling mineral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES — 40 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 39 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2024 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2014 |
| ACUNA, STEPHANIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| BAWA, AMIT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| RIVER VALLEY WELLNESS GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2014 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2014 |
| ERETZ RIVER VALLEY PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/13/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $927K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056258. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.